End Times and Current Events

General Category => ISLAM: Religion of peace ? => Topic started by: Mark on November 05, 2010, 08:46:13 pm



Title: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 05, 2010, 08:46:13 pm
CAIR sues Oklahoma for banning Islamic law
Unindicted terrorist co-conspirator reacts after 70% of voters approve


The Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations announced today it will file a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a state ballot measure that bars judges from considering Islamic law in any ruling.

On Tuesday, with about a dozen other states watching, Oklahoma became the first state to put before voters the proposition that Islamic courts, Islamic law – known as Shariah – and Shariah-based court decisions should be banned.

State Question 755, a constitutional amendment, was approved by 70 percent of Oklahoma voters. But at a news conference today, CAIR-OK Executive Director Muneer Awad called the measure unnecessary and offensive.

"There's no threat," Awad said, according to The Oklahoman newspaper. "It's a legal impossibility."

Awad was joined at the news conference by Chuck Thornton, deputy director of ACLU-Oklahoma; Imad Enchassi, imam of the Islamic Society of Greater Oklahoma City; and Nathaniel Batchelder, director of the Central Oklahoma Human Rights Association.

rest:http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=224009


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Kilika on November 06, 2010, 05:09:24 am
And so the spread of Islam continues. And they're using the law against countries to do it, yet all the while they demand their law be recognized. Strange logic, but it's working. However what they haven't considered apparently, is that the US Constitution forbids what they demand, and it doesn't care what religion you are either.

In fact, US government has no legal right to promote any religion, period. It just "protects" the rights of legal citizens to have a religion if they want one, but government treats that religion as a business type, usually non-profit, but to government, it's still just another business operation that must abide by certain government rules. It doesn't care what the religion is, just that the business end is operating as the government demands. Islam doesn't get an exception, otherwise the Constitution is such that all religions would then have to have their own specific set of laws, not just Sharia, recognized by government. I don't see that happening.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 06, 2010, 05:30:12 am
Sharia law should be introduced into UK legal system, says leading barrister

A leading barrister has said that Sharia law should be incorporated into the English legal system, it has been reported.


Hockman said Sharia law could improve relations between faith groups Photo: EDDIE MULHOLLAND
(http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01121/stephen-hockman_1121085c.jpg)
Stephen Hockman QC, a former chairman of the Bar Council, reportedly suggested that a group of MPs and legal figures should be convened to plan how elements of the Muslim religious-legal code could be introduced.

After speaking at an event organised by the website Islam4UK at the National Liberal Club, Whitehall, Mr Hockman reportedly told The Daily Express: “Given our substantial Muslim population, it is vital that we look at ways to integrate Muslim culture into our traditions. Otherwise we will find that there is a significant section of our society which is increasingly alienated, with very dangerous results.

“There should perhaps be a standing committee comprising Parliamentarians, lawyers and religious leaders to consider how this could be achieved and what legal changes might be framed.”

Sharia law has been criticised for its prevention of some rights for women. Mr Hockman reportedly conceded: “The position of women is one area where the emphasis is, to the say the least, rather different.”

He reportedly added that the incorporation of Sharia could improve relations between faith groups and boost the country’s security.

He said: “I am also sometimes confronted by those who point out that there are elements within the Muslim community who pose a threat to our very security. My answer is not to dispute them but to suggest that it is for those of us forming part of the majority community to address such problems.”

http://www.blacklistednews.com/news-2412-0-13-13--.html


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 06, 2010, 05:33:10 am
New Jersey Judge Rules Islamic Sharia Law Trumps U.S. Law

Fortunately, the ruling was overturned, but it’s obvious sharia is creeping.

A New Jersey family court judge’s decision not to grant a restraining order to a woman who was sexually abused by her Moroccan husband and forced repeatedly to have sex with him is sounding the alarm for advocates of laws designed to ban Shariah in America.

Judge Joseph Charles, in denying the restraining order to the woman after her divorce, ruled that her ex-husband felt he had behaved according to his Muslim beliefs — and that he did not have “criminal desire to or intent to sexually assault” his wife.

According to the court record, the man’s wife — a Moroccan woman who had recently immigrated to the U.S. at the time of the attacks — alleged:

“Defendant forced plaintiff to have sex with him while she cried. Plaintiff testified that defendant always told her “this is according to our religion. You are my wife, I c[an] do anything to you. The woman, she should submit and do anything I ask her to do.”

In considering the woman’s plea for a restraining order after the couple divorced, Charles ruled in June 2009 that a preponderance of the evidence showed the defendant had harassed and assaulted her, but “The court believes that [defendant] was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was something that was consistent with his practices and it was something that was not prohibited.”

Charles’ ruling was overturned last month by New Jersey’s Appellate Court, which ruled that the husband’s religious beliefs were irrelevant and that the judge, in taking them into consideration, “was mistaken.”

The woman’s lawyer, Jennifer Donnelly of New Jersey Legal Services, told FoxNews.com that Charles’ ruling should add to the case for a proposed Oklahoma law, which will be on the ballot in November, which would ban judges from considering “international law or Shariah Law” in their rulings.

“Those who don’t want the bill to pass say, ‘there’s really no need for it because why would a judge walk down that road of religion?’” Donnelly said.

“Clearly here, this judge did walk down that road. He may not have said ‘Shariah law.’ But I think it’s indicative that, in trying to be respectful of religion, judges venture into a very slippery slope.”

Donnelly said she was surprised when Charles refused to issue a restraining order, adding that the only tipoffs that it might happen were questions he put to the husband’s imam when he testified in the case.

The Appeals Court ruling notes, “The imam testified regarding Islamic law as it relates to sexual behavior. The imam confirmed that a wife must comply with her husband’s sexual demands, because the husband is prohibited from obtaining sexual satisfaction elsewhere.

“However, a husband was forbidden to approach his wife ‘like any animal.’ … he acknowledged that New Jersey law considered coerced sex between married people to be ****.”

Charles, a former New Jersey state senator, declined to comment on his ruling. The husband, who represented himself in court, remains unnamed, as does his ex-wife.

While the judge in the case did not specifically mention Islamic or Shariah law, Robert Spencer, director of JihadWatch.com, said he might as well have.

“This is a ruling that is strictly in line with Islamic law, which does indeed declare that a wife may not refuse her husband sex under virtually any circumstances,” Spencer said. “The only legal framework that would not consider marital **** to be sexual assault is Shariah.”

The husband in the case has been indicted on criminal charges and is expected to face trial in the fall.

http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2010/08/07/new-jersey-judge-rules-islamic-sharia-law-trumps-u-s-law/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 06, 2010, 05:35:38 am
Hearing on Sharia law ban set for Monday
A hearing on the Sharia law ban is set for Monday in U.S. District Court.


U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange has scheduled a hearing for 10 a.m. Monday on a lawsuit about the state question banning the use of Sharia law in Oklahoma courts.

Muneer Awad, executive director of the Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), filed a lawsuit Thursday challenging the constitutionality of the voter-approved measure.

About 70 percent of voters approved State Question 755 on Tuesday. The measure prohibits Oklahoma courts from considering international law or Sharia law when making decisions.

Awad is asking the judge for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction barring the Oklahoma State Election Board from certifying the amendment. He said the measure is unconstitutional and "demonizes" Islam and Muslims.

The state question was authored by Rep. Rex Duncan, R-Sand Springs, and Sen. Anthony Sykes, R-Moore. Sykes said Thursday he was saddened that Awad filed a lawsuit intended to thwart the will of Oklahoma voters.


Read more: http://newsok.com/article/3511795#ixzz14UtePSHk


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 06, 2010, 05:37:47 am
Sharia Europe
Sharia law entered Europe after WWII when the weakened European nations retracted from their colonies, bringing to Europe their former colonial subjects as both refugees and cheap labor from such Muslim nations as Pakistan (UK), Turkey (Germany) and Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia (France).

Initially, Sharia law was applied discretely within the small Muslim communities of Europe. But after two generations of high birth rate and immigration, those communities have grown to where the Sharia law now challenges the Judeo-Christian foundations of their host European nations.

In Germany, for example, Muslim men have successfully used the Sharia law in court to defend their right to beat their wives and to practice polygamy.

In United Kingdom, where Islamic imams now outnumber Christian pastors and converting empty church buildings into mosques has become a cottage industry, the Archbishop of Canterbury - the leader of the Church of England - recently stated that adopting elements of the Sharia law into the English judicial system was “unavoidable”.

In France, home to an estimated 14 million Muslims, including 9 million illegal immigrants, the government no longer controls the banlieus, the densely-populated, predominantly Muslim ghettos that encircle most major French cities.

It is still legal in France to distribute Bibles and tracts but doing so in the banlieus, where the French police seldom enter, invites mob violence, and even the legality is expected to end by 2040 when France is projected to become a majority-Muslim nation (The Netherlands will become Western Europe's first majority-Muslim nation by 2015). Sharia is also gaining in North America.

http://www.billionbibles.org/sharia-europe.html


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 06, 2010, 05:39:31 am
Sharia Canada & America
Like some of its European counterparts, the government of Canada for years has been tacitly condoning the application of Sharia law among Canada's Muslim immigrants by sending multiple welfare checks to polygamous Muslim men who raise multiple families in Canada.

Recently, however, the Muslim community of Ontario, Canada's immigrant-rich province, sought to have the Sharia law officially and legally recognized by the government. After a fierce debate, the Premier of Ontario refused to recognize Sharia, at least for now.

But with Canada's Muslim population doubling in the last 10 years, the demographic trends favor a greater role for Sharia law in Canada, where giving out Bibles is still legal but quoting Bible verses that condemn sins (e.g., homosexuality) is already a punishable hate crime.

How about Sharia in America?

At 9 million, the Muslim population in the United States is still relatively small - about the size of the Hispanic population 25 years ago - but it is growing 6 times faster than the national rate.

And in areas with large Muslim communities, Sharia is already being felt. In Minnesota, for example, Sharia's prohibition against alcohol led the government agency managing the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport to propose different color top lights for taxis driven by Muslim drivers so that they can refuse passengers who land with (duty-free) alcohol.

In 2007, Koran for the first time was used to swear into office a new United States Congressman. Carefully positioned away from terrorism, Islam in America is portrayed as a religion of peace.

http://www.billionbibles.org/sharia-canada-america.html


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 06, 2010, 05:44:09 am
Sharia law takes over in Dearborn, MI as Christians lose their First Amendment rights

In a year when Oklahoma is considering a referendum against using Islamic law in their court system, the following video has even more relevance.  A few weeks ago, I wrote a post about the confrontation between David Horowitz and a Muslim student in California, where the Islamic student admitted her support for a second Holocaust.  In that post, I expressed my growing belief that Muslim influence is a growing threat to the United States, that it is not the “religion of peace” that so many people seem to believe it is.

If we needed yet another example that Muslims in America are manipulating the system to their own advantage, here’s Exhibit Q.  Apparently, though the Constitution protects our freedom of expression, that freedom doesn’t apply to standing outside a festival and handing out literature contrary to Islam.  Had this been a Christian rock concert, and CAIR representatives were handing out literature to those going in and coming out, I have my doubts that the police would have shown up in force to remove them from the premises.  Would that this sort of constitutional violation reach the Supreme Court before the Community Organizer stocks it with radicals!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Smw9QuH1xkA&feature=player_embedded

http://theconstitutionalalamo.com/2010/06/26/sharia-law-takes-over-in-dearborn-mi-as-christians-lose-their-first-amendment-rights/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 06, 2010, 05:51:53 am
And so the spread of Islam continues. And they're using the law against countries to do it, yet all the while they demand their law be recognized. Strange logic, but it's working. However what they haven't considered apparently, is that the US Constitution forbids what they demand, and it doesn't care what religion you are either.

In fact, US government has no legal right to promote any religion, period. It just "protects" the rights of legal citizens to have a religion if they want one, but government treats that religion as a business type, usually non-profit, but to government, it's still just another business operation that must abide by certain government rules. It doesn't care what the religion is, just that the business end is operating as the government demands. Islam doesn't get an exception, otherwise the Constitution is such that all religions would then have to have their own specific set of laws, not just Sharia, recognized by government. I don't see that happening.

It is working, especially on the local level. You mass move into an area, than vote in your people to office, than change the laws.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 08, 2010, 12:46:54 pm
CAIR's Shariah defender dodges questions on terror ties
Fights against voter will in Oklahoma, but silent on national agenda

The leader of Oklahoma's chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations got into a feisty exchange on air in which he defended the use of Islamic law in state courts while refusing to answer questions about his organization's national agenda.

CAIR-OK Executive Director Muneer Awad was interviewed today by WND senior reporter Aaron Klein on New York City's WABC 770 AM.

At one point, Awad grew so heated he accused Klein of lying and asked the blusterous question, "Do you condemn the KKK?"

The discussion began with questions about CAIR's legal challenge to a ballot initiative passed by Oklahoma voters that bans judges from using Islamic law – known as Shariah – in court decisions.

Awad argued that the voter-passed constitutional amendment is a violation of Muslims' First Amendment rights, and that "Shariah law has never been used in Oklahoma before this amendment came about."

Klein pointed out, however, that the amendment was intended to be preventative.

The United Kingdom, for example, now has 85 separate Shariah courts for Muslims that operate in parallel with the Crown courts of the nation, and one judge in New Jersey already has cited Shariah in a defense of a man accused of assaulting his wife, though the judge's decision was overturned in appeal.

"A religious law can never replace and conflict the law of our land," Awad countered. "Shariah law doesn't govern the case; Shairah law is something for the judge to consider in order to come to a ruling."

Awad insisted that Shariah is compliant with both American values and its Constitution, since the Islamic law is "dynamic" in that it changes based on circumstances, including governing law of land where implemented.

But when Klein then turned to national issues and the history of CAIR and its founders, Awad grew immediately defensive.

Citing FBI testimony and documents linking CAIR to the international terror-backing organizations Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood, Klein asked if Awad condemned the groups.

"I condemn any organization that is involved in any acts of terrorism," Awad responded.

Awad, however, blasted back that he was "offended" by the questions and challenged, "Do you condemn the KKK?"

"Of course I condemn the KKK, but I'm not part of an organization that was founded by the KKK," Klein said. "You, on the other hand, are part of CAIR, which, there was a new book put out, 'Muslim Mafia,' which brings documentation and that the FBI earlier even testified to this, that your organization, CAIR, was funded by Muslim Brotherhood offshoots, was listed by the Muslim Brotherhood in documents as a like-minded partner."

"That has no academic basis to it," Awad answered. "Absolutely not true."

REST+ AUDIO= http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=225289


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 09, 2010, 03:42:04 am
Judge blocks anti-Shariah amendment

A federal judge has placed a temporary restraining order on Oklahoma's newly approved constitutional amendment prohibiting state courts from considering international or Islamic law when deciding cases.

U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange ruled this morning that the amendment, which was approved by 70 percent of Oklahoma voters through a ballot initiative known as State Question 755, should be put on hold until a Nov. 22 hearing over a possible preliminary injunction.

As WND reported, the Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a state ballot measure, contending it violates the First Amendment's Establishment Clause protecting freedom of religion.

"Today's ruling is a reminder of the strength of our nation's legal system and the protections it grants to religious minorities," responded CAIR-OK Executive Director Muneer Awad. "We are humbled by this opportunity to show our fellow Oklahomans that Muslims are their neighbors and that we are committed to upholding the U.S. Constitution and promoting the benefits of a pluralistic society."

This past week, Oklahoma became the first state to put before voters the proposition that Islamic courts, Islamic law – known as Shariah – and Shariah-based court decisions should be banned.

Awad told The Oklahoman newspaper that "there's no threat" of Shariah law being enforced in the U.S., calling it "a legal impossibility."

One of the chief sponsors of the measure, state Rep. Rex Duncan, however, has argued that while the threat of Shariah in Oklahoma is not "imminent," there's "a storm on the horizon."

The United Kingdom, for example, now has 85 separate Shariah courts for Muslims that operate in parallel with the Crown courts of the nation, and one judge in New Jersey already has cited Shariah in a defense of a man accused of assaulting his wife, though the judge's decision was overturned in appeal.


rest: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=225809


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Kilika on November 09, 2010, 04:15:22 pm
And so the spread of Islam continues. And they're using the law against countries to do it, yet all the while they demand their law be recognized. Strange logic, but it's working. However what they haven't considered apparently, is that the US Constitution forbids what they demand, and it doesn't care what religion you are either.

In fact, US government has no legal right to promote any religion, period. It just "protects" the rights of legal citizens to have a religion if they want one, but government treats that religion as a business type, usually non-profit, but to government, it's still just another business operation that must abide by certain government rules. It doesn't care what the religion is, just that the business end is operating as the government demands. Islam doesn't get an exception, otherwise the Constitution is such that all religions would then have to have their own specific set of laws, not just Sharia, recognized by government. I don't see that happening.

It is working, especially on the local level. You mass move into an area, than vote in your people to office, than change the laws.

That's being done in the southwest where I'm at.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 27, 2010, 10:03:46 am
Sharia law dispute goes to court
Judge to consider arguments on injunction of ban in Okla.

A federal judge will hear arguments Monday on a preliminary injunction against one of the most contentious ballot measures in this month's elections -- an Oklahoma referendum that banned state courts from considering international or Islamic law when deciding cases.

U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange already had blocked certification of SQ755, which passed Nov. 2 with 70 percent of voters backing the measure. Monday's hearing in her Oklahoma City court will focus on a request for a restraining order that would block the law from taking effect until the lawsuit has been resolved.

The case was brought by Muneer Awad, executive director of the Oklahoma Council for American Islamic Relations, on the grounds that the amendment is religious discrimination and would invalidate his will, which is partially based on Islamic law, also known as Sharia law.

The measure has prompted confusion and heated debate over exactly what the measure would ban, with Muslims and other opponents calling the referendum a cheap bit of “Islamophobia” ginned up against a non-existent problem, while anti-jihad activists and the measure's proponents accuse Muslims of bad faith and blame the state for causing the confusion in the first place.

REST: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/nov/21/sharia-law-dispute-goes-to-court/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Mark on December 04, 2010, 05:55:12 am
Judge slams state's anti-Shariah amendment
Grants permanent injunction expecting courts to overturn voter will

Oklahoma's "Save Our State Amendment," which bans state courts from considering Islamic, or Shariah, law when deciding cases, hit a major roadblock today, when a federal judge granted a permanent injunction against the measure.

Chief Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma blocked the state from certifying the amendment – approved by 70 percent of Oklahoma voters through a ballot initiative known as State Question 755 – until an final determination is made on a lawsuit brought against it by the Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

Miles-LaGrange not only granted the injunction on grounds the lawsuit was likely to succeed, but also delivered harsh criticism of the amendment itself.

"Throughout the course of our country's history, the will of the 'majority' has on occasion conflicted with the constitutional rights of individuals," Miles-LaGrange writes in her decision. "Having carefully reviewed the briefs on this issue … the Court finds that [plaintiff Muneer Awad] has shown that he will suffer an injury in fact, specifically, an invasion of his First Amendment rights."

In her decision, the judge said CAIR demonstrated the Shariah ban could be viewed as an "official condemnation" of Islam, resulting in "a stigma" attached to Muslims within the political community. She also argued that since many Islamic last wills and testaments require consideration of Shariah law, under the approved amendment courts would not be able to probate Islamic wills.

Therefore, she ruled, CAIR "has made a strong showing of a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of his claim asserting a violation of the Free Exercise Clause."

CAIR celebrated the ruling as a victory:

"Today marks another day in American history in which our courts have defended the Constitution against those who would deny its protections to a minority community," said CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad. "We agree with Judge Miles-LaGrange and the U.S. Supreme Court that 'fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote.'"

rest: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=234361


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Kilika on December 04, 2010, 01:22:03 pm
Interesting that a US judge is considering the results of a civil suit to make a determination of law. How messed up is that? Far be it from me to think that suits are determined based on US law and case history. Up is down in the world no question. Unfortunetly, we can expect more of the same.

While I don't think Muslims should be denied their religious practices, they have no more right to contradict US law than any other religion. US law cannot be a respector of religion being secular, which would be religious discrimination and that would violate US law. The whole intent of the Constitution is to seperate itself from personal beliefs and religious preferences. That's why they keep taking down the 10 Commandments in government faciltites. If concessions are made for one religion, then the same must apply to all religions based on the logic of US law, including Christians that are moved to preach the gospel wheresoever the Spirit moves them. I cannot see though any part of the world tolerating free-range Christians considering who the world is run by. ;)

Knowing prophecy and the personality of the world, I'd say Islam will get it's recognition, as it has in other parts of the world. To what end I cannot tell, but knowing that Islam is not of Jesus, it ain't good, not for the US, or any other part of the world.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Mark on December 14, 2010, 10:07:04 am
More states enter debate on sharia law

At issue is an amendment to Oklahoma's constitution passed overwhelmingly on Election Day that bars judges from considering Islamic or international law in Oklahoma state courts. Awad sued, and last week a federal judge temporarily blocked the law from taking effect while she determines whether it violates the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits establishment of a state religion.

Although Oklahoma's law is the first to come under court scrutiny, legislators in at least seven states, including Arizona, Florida, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee and Utah, have proposed similar laws, the National Conference of State Legislatures says. Tennessee and Louisiana have enacted versions of the law banning use of foreign law under certain circumstances.

rest: http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2010-12-09-shariaban09_ST_N.htm


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Mark on January 13, 2011, 06:11:39 am
State Shariah ban moves up judicial ladder
Arguments pending before 10th Circuit on validity of voters' decision


A constitutional scholar who graduated cum laude from Harvard Law and later taught at the University of Oklahoma and Oral Roberts University says a federal judge got it backwards when she wrote an opinion that Oklahoma voters would not be allowed to ban the use of Shariah law in their courts.

That opinion came from Chief Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, who before Christmas blocked the state from certifying a constitutional amendment approved by 70 percent of Oklahoma voters through a ballot initiative known as State Question 755.

A Muslim activist had contended in court that he would be injured by having his religious law banned from use in the courts, and Miles-LaGrange agreed, writing that plaintiff Muneer Awad "has shown that he will suffer an injury in fact, specifically, an invasion of his First Amendment rights."

The judge's order prevented state officials from certifying the election results on that issue, and it now is being appealed to the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver, where a decision is not expected probably until mid-summer.



Read more: State Shariah ban moves up judicial ladder http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=250065#ixzz1AutTEMkx


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Mark on January 25, 2011, 05:54:08 am
Texas legislator moves to stop Shariah
Targets constitutional abuses from Islam, immigration, presidential impostors

A Texas legislator has proposed a state constitutional amendment that would effectively bar courts in the Lone Star State from considering Islamic, or Shariah, law in deciding cases.

Rep. Leo Berman, R-Tyler, earlier this month submitted House Joint Resolution No. 57, which would amend the Texas Constitution to read, "A court of this state shall uphold the laws of the Constitution of the United States, this Constitution, federal laws and laws of this state. A court of this state may not enforce, consider or apply any religious or cultural law."

Berman has been a controversial figure in Texas, repeatedly filing bills on today's hottest constitutional controversies:

    * For example, Berman filed a bill that would nullify the national health-care legislation commonly called Obamacare in Texas as an unconstitutional overreach of federal authority;

    * He filed a bill that would require candidates for president or vice president to show their birth certificates to the secretary of state before being allowed on the ballot;

    * And he filed a bill asking his state to reconsider the constitutionality of allowing illegal immigrants to pay reduced, in-state tuition at public colleges and universities.

Ibrahim Hooper of the Council on American-Islamic Relations condemned Berman's latest bill, as well as similar measures in other states that would ban Shariah law from American courts. Hooper claims the constitutional amendment is an attack on the religious freedom of Muslims.

"What we are seeing is those that are trying to enact laws targeting the American Muslim community's constitutional rights realize they are not going to pass legal muster," Hooper told The American Independent. "So they are finding backdoor, roundabout ways to accomplish the same thing."

Thomas Kidd, a senior fellow at the Institute for Studies of Religion at Baylor University in Waco, Texas, also criticized Berman's bill, calling its language an "ill-conceived" attempt to block Shariah in the U.S.

"In the end, this amendment implies that religion and culture cannot influence our law as Texans. The problem is that religion and culture inform all law," Kidd writes in a Houston Chronicle editorial. "Texans overwhelmingly approved a ban on same-sex marriage in 2005 – would anyone deny that much of the support for this amendment emerged from religious conviction? Let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater."

Berman, however, says American courts need to recognize they are bound by constitutional law alone, and not subject to the whims of men or multiculturalism.

"A lot of federal courts are referring to international courts and laws of other countries. We want to make sure our courts are not doing this, especially in regards to cultural laws," Berman told The American Independent. "If that includes Shariah law, then so be it."

(Column continues below)

Read more: Texas legislator moves to stop Shariah http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=255253#ixzz1C2zTqW8v


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Kilika on January 25, 2011, 12:57:34 pm
Notice what level of government is backing Sharia law? Locals don't want it, which is closest to the public's desire, yet we have the federal government opposing the state level authority through the actions of federal judges.

And if they haven't already, I suspect the UN will jump into the fight backing Islam, and put pressure on countries to accept it.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: Mark on February 03, 2011, 12:48:00 pm
Protecting Wyoming from sharia law

Wyoming may follow Oklahoma's lead and consider a ban on sharia law, as a legislator has proposed a bill that would amend the state's Constitution and bar judges from using Islamic and international law when ruling on cases before the court.

 
Republican State Representative Gerald Gay says he proposed the bill as a "pre-emptive strike" to protect his state from the growing influence of sharia law around the world. For several years, Gay worked as an engineer in Saudi Arabia's oil industry, so he experienced first-hand the rule of sharia law.

"I have quite a bit of extensive personal exposure to sharia, so it's not like I'm dealing with something that's unfamiliar or like somebody else came up with the idea and just came to me and asked for sponsorship," the Wyoming Republican explains. "I'm bringing my own basket of goods to the deal."


rest: http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=1287146


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one state at a time!
Post by: akfools on March 03, 2011, 02:25:24 am
Tenn. bill would make following Shariah a felony

Tennessee is considering making it a felony to follow some versions of the Islamic code known as Shariah, the most severe measure yet put forth by a national movement whose members believe extremist Muslims want Shariah to supersede the Constitution.

The bill — drawn up by conservatives with ties to opponents of a planned Islamic center two blocks from New York City's ground zero and efforts to expand a mosque 30 miles southeast of Nashville — would face steep constitutional hurdles if enacted.

Nevertheless, it represents the boldest legislative attempt yet to limit how Muslims worship.

Muslim groups fear the measure would outlaw central tenets of Islam, such as praying five times a day toward Mecca, abstaining from alcohol or fasting for Ramadan.

"This is an anti-Muslim bill that makes it illegal to be a Muslim in the state of Tennessee," said Remziya Suleyman, policy coordinator for the Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition, which was among several civil rights and interfaith groups that held a news conference Tuesday to oppose the proposal.

Nadeem Siddiqi, a 35-year-old American Muslim entrepreneur who drove about 160 miles from Knoxville to attend the event, said Shariah governs his life.

As written, he said the proposal is "overly broad" and "basically includes all Muslims and all their practices as being illegal."

"Shariah is how I know how to fast in the month of Ramadan; how I wash before my prayers," he said. "It also directs me in how much charity I need to give to the poor. It orders me to be honest and fair in my business dealings."

The bill's sponsor, Republican Sen. Bill Ketron of Murfreesboro, said the proposal exempts the peaceful practice of Islam but seeks to condemn those "who take Shariah law to the other extreme." He said it would give state and local law enforcement officials "a powerful counterterrorism tool."

Ketron, who has successfully pushed through bills tightening restrictions on illegal immigrants, said he expects the Shariah measure will become law. He said he doesn't have a problem with Muslims and is open to talking with them about their concerns.

"My daughter went to the prom with a Muslim," Ketron said. "I want to hear from them."

For now, supporters of the measure are working to bolster it against any constitutional challenges, which may be an impossible task, said First Amendment Center scholar Charles Haynes, who called it a "really distorted understanding of Shariah law."

"The legislation would clearly be unconstitutional," he said. "Trying to separate out different parts of Islamic law for condemnation is nonsensical. Shariah law, like all religious law, is interpreted in a great many different ways."

Shariah is a set of core principles that most Muslims recognize as well as a series of rulings from religious scholars. It covers many areas of life and different sects have different versions of the code they follow.

At least 13 states have bills pending that would bar judges from considering Shariah in legal decisions, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, but none of those proposals is as strict as what Tennessee is weighing.

If the law is passed in Tennessee, it could face a legal challenge. The law passed in November by Oklahoma voters banning the use of Shariah law in state courtrooms was blocked by a federal judge pending the resolution of a lawsuit calling it unconstitutional.

Ketron said he and House Speaker Pro Tempore Judd Matheny, R-Tullahoma, were given the bill by the Tennessee Eagle Forum.

Eagle Forum state President Bobbie Patray said it was drafted by David Yerushalmi, an Arizona-based attorney who runs the Society of Americans for National Existence, a nonprofit that claims following Shariah is treasonous.

Yerushalmi has written for years in conservative media about what he calls the danger of Shariah and its central role in Islam. He has represented Pamela Geller, who leads the group Stop Islamization of America and is one of the most vocal critics of a planned Islamic center two blocks from New York City's ground zero.

Yerushalmi also represented Stop The Madrassa, a group that opposed a public school in Brooklyn established to teach Arabic language, culture and history. He is one of the contributors to the report "Shariah: The Threat To America" by the Center for Security Policy, a think tank led by Frank Gaffney, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense in the Reagan administration.

Last year Gaffney testified at a court hearing on the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro. The hearing was intended only to determine if local officials violated the state's open meetings law in approving the site plan, but the mosque's foes used the opportunity to argue it was part of a plot to expand Shariah law in the U.S.

Yerushalmi said the legislation in Tennessee is clear about who's being targeted.

"The legislation simply states that Shariah that follows the law of jihad, which calls for the violent overthrow of the Tennessee and U.S. government, is the Shariah that is at issue," he said.

Sarah Thompson, a spokeswoman for the Islamic Society of North America, disagreed.

"The way that it's worded makes the assumption that any practice of Islam is a practice of terrorism," she said. "And that's a dangerous line to walk. It excludes the millions of Muslims that are practicing peaceably from the ability to do so."

Republican Gov. Bill Haslam said he plans to meet with the bill's sponsors to find out more about the proposal, but said he wants to ensure "that we're doing things that are welcoming people to Tennessee that are legally here."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110301/ap_on_re/us_rel_tennessee_shariah_law


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on March 03, 2011, 06:18:56 am
There is a lot more to this article, im just posting the relevant parts.

Muslims equate criticism with hate
Denounce plans to investigate domestic terrorism

Muslim groups today cried foul over what they have alleged is a growing "cottage industry of hate" in America.

The Arab American Institute and the Muslim Public Affairs Council held a joint forum in Washington and said the event is their answer to U.S. Rep. Peter King's domestic terror hearings set to begin next week.

In a prepared statement for the packed Rayburn House Building hearing room, Arab American Institute Executive Director Maya Berry said that "Islamophobia" is on the increase, lifting quotes from three members of the U. S. House.

"Islam, quote, is very vile, very vicious and we've allowed it to come into this country because we ride around with bumper stickers that say, 'Coexist,'" Berry quoted.

"'There are too many mosques in America,' 'I am running for the people of the 2nd North Carolina District who are good, hard-working Christian people,'" Berry also quoted.

"These were the comments of Congressman Allen West, Chairman Peter King and Congresswoman Renee Ellmers, respectively," Berry added.

Berry continued by saying that she believes dialogue is important.

"When different people with different views on issues, it's important that we are able to engage in a discourse and dialogue about them. When it's elected officials who are talking about the American Muslim community, often about the Arab-American community in a way like this, it's a slightly different kind of dynamic," Berry said.

"One of the key parts of this argument is the creeping Shariah argument, We've seen more people adopting this, the idea that Shariah law as they define it, quote, a military, religious doctrine of war as it was defined in a report from the Center for Security Policy is in and of itself a threat to the United States," Duss continued.

Duss added that anti-Muslim feeling in the United States has prompted over a dozen states to propose or pass anti-Shariah law provisions.

Oklahoma voters passed an anti-Shariah referendum but a federal judge ruled that some provisions were unconstitutional.

Other states that have passed or introduced anti-Shariah bills are Tennessee, Texas, Wyoming, South Carolina, Louisiana, South Dakota, and Georgia.

Institute for Global Engagement Senior Fellow Suhail Khan said a "cottage industry of hate" has appeared and called out specific anti-Muslim activists and accused them of a smear campaign.

"These people have grown in their ability to get their hateful message out there, their misinformation and their fear mongering, in intensity, in recent years that we've seen now, particularly on the net," Khan said.



Read more: Muslims equate criticism with hate http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=270121#ixzz1FXR5WABw


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on March 03, 2011, 02:17:24 pm
TN's anti-sharia debate heats up

A radical Islamic group is pressuring Tennessee lawmakers to drop legislation aimed at keeping sharia law out of The Volunteer State.

According to The Tennessean, the anti-sharia initiative has been introduced in the Senate by State Senator Bill Ketron, and in the Assembly by State Representative Judd Matheny. The twin bills are aimed at providing a powerful counter-terrorism tool to state and local law enforcement by allowing for civil and/or criminal penalties against anyone providing material support or resources to terrorist organizations.
 
But recently the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a front group for the terrorist organization Hamas, held a news conference attempting to use scare tactics to convince the legislators to drop the bill.

Guy Rodgers is executive director of Act! for America, which supports the legislation. CAIR, he says, has terrorist ties. "They are an organization that supports terrorist types of activities, such as through Hamas, and they're an organization that supports sharia," he says.
 
According to the Act! for America spokesman, CAIR's national communications director, Ibrahim Hooper, has made statements indicative of that stance.
 
"He wished that the government of America would be Islamic sometime in the future," says Rodgers. "So as we are taking on sharia law and its consequence, which is terrorism, not surprisingly these people are standing up -- they're screaming, they're yelling, they're saying it's a violation of freedom of religion. It's not."
 
Rodgers says his organization believes the Tennessee legislation has been written to withstand constitutional scrutiny.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=1304506


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on April 11, 2011, 05:16:18 am
Texas may ban courts from considering foreign laws

Texas lawmakers are considering whether to ban state courts from considering foreign religious or cultural laws, such as the Islamic law of Shariah.

The goal "is to require a Texas court to uphold and apply only the laws ordained by the constitutions of (Texas and the United States), prohibiting any other interpretation," said Rep. Leo Berman, R-Tyler, a former Arlington mayor pro tem. "This is now happening all over Europe ... and in Dearborn, Mich. ... and it could spread throughout the United States.

"We all know what Shariah law does to women - women must wear burqas, women are subject to humiliation and into controlled marriages under Shariah law," he said. "We want to prevent it from ever happening in Texas."

A bill by Berman to prevent foreign laws from being recognized in Texas courts, as well as a twin proposal by Rep. Randy Weber, R-Pearland, went before the House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence last week. Both bills were left pending.

Texas is among several states - including Alaska, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Tennessee - considering bans on the recognition of foreign laws, according to the Institute for U.S. Law.

Questioning necessity
The bill does not specifically name Shariah, but Berman and others have cited it as a concern. They note increasing instances of other states recognizing foreign laws to, for example, give a father custody of a child or deny a restraining order for a wife, saying a husband acted under Shariah.

Shariah is a set of core principles that most Muslims recognize, as well as a series of rulings from religious scholars. It covers many areas of life, and different sects follow different versions.

Several civil-rights and interfaith groups have blasted the legislative efforts in Texas and other states as unconstitutional and unfair to Muslims.

"It's not just happening in Dearborn," Pat Carlson, a Fort Worth woman and president of the conservative Texas Eagle Forum, told the committee. "This is something happening in other states."

When asked by a committee member whether she thinks Shariah is invading the country, Carlson said, "It has got tentacles in our country."

Officials with the American Civil Liberties Union and Texas Freedom Network were among those opposing the bill, although they didn't testify.

Some committee members questioned whether the bill is needed.

"Even if what you are saying is true, there are extremists on every end of the political spectrum," said Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-San Antonio, a committee member. "So what makes you think they're going to take over the country?"

Business concerns
Lee Parsley, president of the Austin-based Texas Civil Justice League, said a broad bill preventing foreign laws could affect companies doing business in Texas that might agree, for instance, to operate under Mexican law to curb liabilities.

"I have concerns for Texas businesses," said Parsley, of the lawsuit reform coalition group. "It creates uncertainty for contracts."

But Dorrie O'Brien, a Grand Prairie woman who worked to add a plank to the Republican Party of Texas' platform in 2010 asking state lawmakers not to let Shariah be recognized in Texas, said lawmakers need to take a stand.

"Shariah law is a complete way of life," she said. "We cannot have a substitute law ... running alongside our Constitution.

"There can only be one set of law recognized in the United States. Shariah law goes against everything that we believe in."

Weber said Shariah isn't the only foreign law that he and others are concerned about.

"We are concerned about any other foreign law," he said. "This is a unique opportunity ... to do something really historic.

"It doesn't mean that we are paranoid. It just means we protect our own."

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7514927.html


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on April 11, 2011, 06:13:53 am
How ironic that the United States is by far mostly "Christian", at least most claim to be Christain, yet the court system won't allow rulings based on Christian doctrine.

Consider that if a jury finds a person guilty in a court of law, that person will be punished, no matter how repentant the defendant is. The courts go by the law, eye for an eye, which is a direct violation of the grace of Jesus Christ.

If the US courts allow recognition of Sharia, they MUST allow recognition of the Christian "law of grace" and any other religion, otherwise there would be a constitutional violation of the 1st Amendment. The Constitution doesn't allow for the recognition of a given religion, period.

Quote
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on April 15, 2011, 08:38:59 am
The goal of terrorism? Sharia law

FOX News analyst Dick Morris believes many judges today want to "legitimize" sharia law and make it "an element of Western jurisprudence."

Morris told attendees of the Pacific Justice Institute's recent annual gala in Anaheim, California, that sharia law is a monumental threat to the United States government, noting that many judges in America are ruling in favor of it.
 
He argues that it is dangerous to include Islamic sharia law in Western jurisprudence. "It is not that the sharia law is a method of helping terrorism," he stated. "The goal of international terrorism is the imposition of sharia law."
 
The former White House advisor explains that most major financial institutions in the world -- such as AIG, Morgan Stanley, and Citibank -- have a sharia-compliance fund where individuals can have their investments go directly to sharia-vetted activities. Under a sharia-compliance fund, he explains, a Muslim must give 2.5 percent of their total net worth annually -- and the funds are directed by sharia-compliance boards that choose where the money goes.
 
"And those funds are run by sharia-compliance boards, which consist of the most horrible Islamic imam extremists you can imagine," he added. "Five or six of them have been bounced off the boards because they went on terror watch lists."
 
Morris suggests that the funds are a "huge financing arm of Hamas and Hezbollah and other terrorist groups."

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Security/Default.aspx?id=1330004


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on April 15, 2011, 08:40:04 am
Shutting down sharia in U.S.

A California-based constitutional attorney has joined a group in urging state legislatures across the U.S. to pass a law to prevent sharia law from transcending the nation's criminal law.

Karen Lugo, an attorney based in southern California, serves as The Federalist Society's expert on sharia law and was recently appointed to the California Advisory Committee's Commission on Civil Rights. She reports that 25 of the 50 U.S. states have taken it upon themselves to stand up for constitutional freedoms through legislation and court cases, as many state legislators are concerned about a recent ruling from a judge in New Jersey.

"A judge ruled that a former husband was not guilty of **** or violating his former wife's rights when he had harassed her through the period of a separation because the man acted according to what he perceived as his sharia right," Lugo explains.

Even though that judge's ruling was overturned on appeal, it instigated concerns throughout the country.

"Immediately you saw states and legislators become concerned about the fact that in America a judge had gone out of his way to consider a personal affiliation or loyalty to sharia as transcending our own criminal law," the sharia expert notes.


So Lugo has joined a task force in encouraging state lawmakers to approve "American Laws for American Courts," legislation that denies all international law from invading America's constitutional rights.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=1329952



Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on April 15, 2011, 01:36:38 pm
What judges should be saying from the bench is, "Well, you may be innocent in the eyes of your god, but according to Caesar, your guilty!" *slams gavel*.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on June 01, 2011, 06:48:46 am
The Sharia Threat to America

On this week's special edition of the Stakelbeck on Terror show, CBN News analyzes the growing push by radical Muslims to incorporate Islamic Sharia law in America.

National security experts Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy and retired Lt. Gen. William "Jerry" Boykin join the conversation. The pair contributed to the Team B II report, "Shariah: The Threat to America."

Watch as they explain how Sharia is making inroads in the U.S., who's behind the trend, and what can be done to stop it.

Click play to watch this week's edition of Stakelbeck on Terror.
http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2011/May/Stakelbeck-on-Terror-Sharias-Threat-to-America/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on August 19, 2011, 06:04:43 am
Muslims denounce bill to ban 'foreign laws'

Well of course they do. If they dont like the laws here, leave.

Opposition is mounting among Muslims against pending legislation that would ban Michigan courts from considering "foreign laws" — including Sharia, or Islamic law.

Muslim and community leaders gathered Tuesday in Midtown to denounce legislation from state Rep. Dave Agema, R-Grandville, as divisive, unnecessary and mean-spirited.

"This plan goes against our country's core values of accepting people from all races and walks of life," said state Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Detroit, who is Muslim. "We simply cannot move forward with this plan.

"It's racism at its core."

Similar measures are under consideration in 25 other state legislatures, and supporters say the protections are needed. The Michigan bill doesn't mention Sharia, but watchdog groups say they've identified 50 cases nationwide that could be influenced by the religious rules. Most involved divorce or child custody.

Another sponsor of the Michigan bill, Rep. Martin Knollenberg, R-Troy, said the legislation is necessary because "we shouldn't allow other laws to usurp the state constitution."

He scoffed at critics who called the bill racist: "Where does it say (in the bill) it's anti-Muslim?"

Agema last week called the accusations of bigotry "hogwash."

A House committee has yet to take up discussion of the bill. The Council of American-Islamic Relations' Michigan chapter announced Tuesday it would sue if it becomes law. Gov. Rick Snyder's office hasn't done an analysis of the measure, said his spokeswoman, Geralyn Lasher.

"We don't know if this is an issue taking place or whether there is a need" for a law, she said.

The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee also encouraged members Tuesday to contact their state representatives and urge them to oppose the bill.



From The Detroit News: http://detnews.com/article/20110817/POLITICS02/108170375/Muslims-denounce-bill-to-ban-‘foreign-laws’#ixzz1VTJJNQc9


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 19, 2011, 08:50:00 am
"This plan goes against our country's core values of accepting people from all races and walks of life," said state Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Detroit, who is Muslim. "We simply cannot move forward with this plan.

"It's racism at its core."

 ???

Islam is a RELIGION, NOT a *race*.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on August 19, 2011, 09:17:07 am
???

Islam is a RELIGION, NOT a *race*.

 :D i was wondering if any one else would pick up on that.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on August 29, 2011, 07:35:19 am
Sharia Law Topic of First Amendment Panel Discussions


The First Amendment Center moderated a panel discussion in Tennessee this week, addressing a growing legal concern in the United States: Sharia Law.

About 20 U.S. states have legislative measures filed barring judges from considering Sharia law in their decisions. Four states have passed legislation. An earlier restatement of a Tennessee law would effectively criminalize the practice of Islam, punishing those individuals with up to 15 years in prison.

Open Doors advocacy coordinator Lindsay Vessey explains, "Sharia law is basically Islamic law, and that deals with everything from legal issues to social issues and marital issues—it basically controls every aspect of one's life."

In recent years, a movement has been growing steadily as more Muslims come to the U.S. to live. Vessey says, "In Western countries, a lot of Muslims would like to bring Sharia law. Their argument is essentially that to be culturally sensitive to them, these countries should allow them to govern themselves by their own Sharia law, and that it doesn't really contradict or cause any problems with the existing legal structure."

Opponents of such laws say the proposals reflect an "Islamaphobia" aimed at restricting the presence and religious beliefs of Muslims. However, Vessey explains, "It actually takes away the rights of people who maybe don't want to be subjected to Sharia law, but because they were born into a Muslim family who ascribes to it, they're actually forced into it. That's a really dangerous situation, to have two parallel systems of law going on in a country."

In other countries experimenting with the concept, the Sharia law system has proven to be chaotic. "One of the best examples where we can see this is in England," Vessey says. "There are hundreds of Sharia courts there. Many of the Muslim immigrants use those courts as opposed to using the British legal system."

The issue is that "under Sharia law, something that's illegal is to convert away from Islam. That means that if you are a Muslim in England and you are being subjected to Sharia law, you can't convert to Christianity, or you can't even leave your faith and become an atheist," explains Vessey.

Under that scenario, there is no religious freedom. Vessey says the argument that Sharia does not conflict with an existing legal system also fails the Constitution test. "You can be punished under that law," Vessey says. "That's a court that would be in direct contradiction to our laws here in the United States—the freedom of religion/ freedom of expression is one of our dearest-held constitutional beliefs."

Similar to other bills in the U.S., the language does not mention "Sharia" specifically. For example, the Michigan bill, introduced by State Rep. Dave Agema, R-Grandville, says the ban would "limit the application and enforcement ... of foreign laws that would impair constitutional rights."

Vessey says although Muslim groups are threatening to challenge the constitutionality of the proposals, the legal argument will likely be what defenders are focused on: "Everything that goes at the heart of what Americans believe and what is enshrined in our Constitution is contradicted by Sharia law in terms of religious freedom. Something should be done to prevent having Sharia courts and Sharia law being used side-by-side in the United States like is already being done in England."

As the opponents and proponents of the bills continue to make their cases, Vessey says it's important not to forget the reason why believers are part of this discussion: "The one thing that we can do is to pray that their hearts and eyes are opened to the message of the Gospel. Pray for opportunities to share with Muslims in our communities."

http://www.charismanews.com/us/31861-sharia-law-topic-of-first-amendment-panel-discussions


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on September 07, 2011, 05:43:02 am
The Sharia Threat to America

On this week's special edition of the Stakelbeck on Terror show, CBN News analyzes the growing push by radical Muslims to incorporate Islamic Sharia law in America.

National security experts Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy and retired Lt. Gen. William "Jerry" Boykin join the conversation. The pair contributed to the Team B II report, "Shariah: The Threat to America."

Watch as they explain how Sharia is making inroads in the U.S., who's behind the trend, and what can be done to stop it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjg5R-fzL4o

full vid: http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2011/May/Stakelbeck-on-Terror-Sharias-Threat-to-America/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on September 13, 2011, 09:24:22 am
Appeals Court Hears Challenge to Oklahoma's Sharia Law Ban


Oklahoma Solicitor General Patrick Wyrick fielded pointed questions Monday from judges on the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals who asked why a state constitutional amendment banning Sharia law applies only to one religion.

“There’s no mention of any other specific law,” said Judge Scott Matheson, appointed last year to the Denver-based federal court by President Barack Obama. “We just have Sharia law singled out.”

Wyrick explained that the Oklahoma ballot measure that would ban Sharia law, SQ 775, the “Save our State” amendment, applies not just to Sharia – the body of law based on the Quran and the religion of Islam – but to all international laws.

Approved in November 2010 by 70 percent of voters in the Sooner State, the measure is aimed at so-called “cases of first impression,” legal matters for which there is no specific law or precedent on which to render a decision.

Often in such cases, judges look to laws or precedents outside their jurisdiction for some guidance as to how to rule. The Oklahoma amendment, concerning which the 10th Circuit heard opposing oral arguments Monday, declares that states may not consider anything other than U.S. laws.

Muneer Awad, executive director of the Oklahoma chapter of the Council of American-Islamic Relations, has mounted the court challenge to SQ 775 with the help of the ACLU and support of Muslim organizations around the country.

His challenge claims that Oklahoma’s proposed ban on Sharia law violates the First Amendment’s guarantee of free exercise of religion. He accuses the supporters of SQ 775, carried in the state legislature by the Republican Rep. Rex Duncan, of being “politically motivated.”

Duncan denies the accusation. He says he just doesn’t want Oklahoma judges deciding state cases on the basis of Sharia or other non-American laws. And while Awad and other Muslim leaders suggest that the prospect is remote of Sharia law being applied in Oklahoma or any other state, it has, in fact occurred.

Perhaps the most notorious case occurred in 2008 when a New Jersey woman sought a temporary restraining order against her estranged husband, whom she claimed had raped her.

A trial judge denied the restraining order, ruling that the husband had acted according to Sharia law, under which “his desire to have sex when and whether he wanted to” was not prohibited, no matter state or federal law.

http://www.christianpost.com/news/appeals-court-hears-challenge-to-oklahomas-sharia-law-ban-55501/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 23, 2011, 12:57:50 pm
Libya's transitional leader declares liberation

10/23/11

..BENGHAZI, Libya (AP) — Libya's transitional leader declared his country's liberation on Sunday, three days after the hated dictator Moammar Gadhafi was captured and killed.

He called on Libyans to show "patience, honesty and tolerance" and eschew hatred as they embark on rebuilding the country at the end of an 8-month civil war.

The transitional government leader Mustafa Abdul-Jalil set out a vision for the post-Gadhafi future with an Islamist tint, saying that Islamic Sharia law would be the "basic source" of legislation in the country and that existing laws that contradict the teachings of Islam would be nullified. In a gesture that showed his own piety, he urged Libyans not to express their joy by firing in the air, but rather to chant "Allahu Akbar," or God is Great. He then stepped aside and knelt to offer a brief prayer of thanks.

"This revolution was looked after by God to achieve victory," he told the crowd at the declaration ceremony in the eastern city of Benghazi, the birthplace of the uprising against Gadhafi began. He thanked those who fell in the fight against Gadhafi's forces. "This revolution began peacefully to demand the minimum of legitimate rights, but it was met by excessive violence."

Abdul-Jalil said new banks would be set up to follow the Islamic banking system, which bans charging interest. For the time being, he said interest would be canceled from any personal loans already taken out less than 10,000 Libyan dinars (about $7,500).

He also announced that all military personnel and civilians who have taken part in the fight against Gadhafi would be promoted to the rank above their existing one. He said a package of perks would later be announced for all fighters.

"Thank You, thank you to the fighters who achieved victory, both civilians and military," he said. He also paid tribute to the Gulf Cooperation Council, a six-nation alliance led by Saudi Arabia, The Arab League and the European Union. NATO, which aided the anti-Gadhafi fighters with airstrikes, performed its task with "efficiency and professionalism."

..


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: PeanutGallery on October 23, 2011, 05:14:31 pm
???

Islam is a RELIGION, NOT a *race*.
:D i was wondering if any one else would pick up on that.
It's religious and political.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on October 26, 2011, 05:51:00 am
Islam makes inroads through U.S. courts
Many cases being decided by edicts from Muhammad


Islamic law, or Shariah, already is being applied in the U.S. court system, according to an extensive new report.

A recent Center for Security Policy study called "Shariah Law and American State Courts: An Assessment of State Appellate Court Cases
http://shariahinamericancourts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Sharia_Law_And_American_State_Courts_1.4_06212011.pdf
 outlines dozens of cases in which the Islamic system of law has been applied.

Center spokesman David Reaboi said the Islamic strictures are being carried out mostly in cases in which foreigners are the principals.

"Shariah enters U.S. courts through the practice of comity to foreign law," Reaboi explained. "This happens, for example, when a judge decides to allow the use of say, Pakistani or Saudi family law (Shariah) in a dispute between Pakistanis or Saudis."

He said the study only scratches the surface of Shariah's presence in the nation.

"For every case in this sample drawn from published appellate legal cases, there are innumerable cases at the trial level that remain unnoticed except by the participants," the study said. "Thus, this report is a only a sample of possible cases – a 'tip of the iceberg' – of legal cases involving Shariah in local, state and federal courts."

Among the cases cited was one from New Jersey in which a wife sought a restraining order against her husband because of spousal abuse.

"S.D. (wife) and M.J.R. (husband) were both Muslims and citizens of Morocco and both resided in New Jersey. After only three months of marriage, husband began physically abusing wife. The physical abuse administered by husband injured wife's entire body including her breasts and pubic area," the report said. "Additionally, husband forced himself on wife and had non-consensual sex with her on multiple occasions. Husband stated to wife that Islam allowed him to have sex with her at any time he wished. Wife asked the trial court to grant a restraining order against husband shortly after he verbally divorced her in front of their imam," the report said.

"The trial court refused to issue a final restraining order against husband finding that, although husband had harassed and assaulted wife, husband believed it was his religious right to have non-consensual sex with his wife and that belief precluded any criminal intent on the part of husband," according to the report.

"The New Jersey appellate court reversed the trial court and ordered that the trial court enter a final restraining order against husband. The New Jersey appellate court stated that the trial court erroneously allowed the husband's religious beliefs to excuse him from New Jersey’s criminal code and that husband knowingly engaged in non-consensual sex with wife," the report said.

The report also presents details of 19 more "top cases" and a summary of 50 cases from 23 states that have used Shariah as the basis for court decisions.

American Center for Law and Justice Shariah expert Shaheryar Gill said in the prominent New Jersey case, "the judge actually looked at Shariah law to decide."

Gill says an ACLJ book, "Shariah Law: Radical Islam's Threat to the U.S. Constitution," discusses the problem.

"In the case of 'S.D. v. M.J.R,' the New Jersey appellate court rightly refused to accommodate the sincerely held religious beliefs of a Muslim man who physically, verbally, and sexually abused his wife in accordance with Shariah," the ACLJ book says.

The study emphasizes that family law is only part of the complete Shariah picture. It concludes that since Islamic religious law moves further than American constitutional law on a range of subjects, Shariah is incompatible with U.S. precedents.

"Institutionalized, authoritative Shariah is comprehensive and by definition without limit in its ambitions and scope, and it also includes legally mandated, recommended, permitted, discouraged and prohibited practices that are strongly biased and discriminatory against women, homosexuals and non-Muslims," the study said.

"Shariah law provides a legal framework for violence up to and including legalized murder against apostates (people who have left Islam), homosexuals, blasphemers and especially women accused of various crimes," the study said.

"Just this year in 2011, in Pakistan's Shariah legal system, both apostates and blasphemers have been imprisoned and faced execution. Shariah criminal punishments are extreme, including amputations and lashings for numerous crimes," the study reported.

WND reported in January about the high profile blasphemy case of Pakistani Christian woman Asia Bibi, who received the death penalty for blasphemy, simply for sharing the Gospel with her Muslim coworkers.

WND also reported in June that former terrorist Kamal Saleem agreed that one of the methods of carrying out jihad is through the courts.

"What they're trying to do is fake cases for Islam and these cases are done purposefully. We take an imam, there are two of them. They were fighting against each other and the fight was over a mosque," Saleem said. "That is so devious and it is part of the culture of Islamic invasion. These two imams are fighting over a mosque in Florida. Each imam says it belongs to me.

"One says I built it and I raised the funds. The other one says the Wahhabi government put me over here and they're the ones who sent the money. Both of them are right," Saleem continued.

"They went to the Supreme Court in Florida. What happened is that they said this was a Muslim matter and you need to judge us by Islamic Shariah law or you will not understand how these things work," he said.

Gill said there are other recent cases that demonstrate the level to which Shariah has infiltrated the court system.

"There are different types of cases in which you see that Shariah or Islamic law is applied or is required to be applied, or looked at," Gill said.

"For example, indirectly, there are cases in which foreign judgments are brought into the United States and enforced here," he said.

One such case according to the ACLJ's booklet is the case of 'Farah v. Farah,' heard in Virginia.

In that case, a Virginia trial judge recognized the validity of a Muslim marriage that was conducted through a proxy in England."

"The trial judge ruled that the marriage, which was solemnized in England (though no certificate of marriage was issued by any English authority) and its ceremony completed in Pakistan, must be honored in Virginia because 'the law of the state of Pakistan sanctions marriages performed under the personal law of the parties which in this case was Moslem law,'" the ACLJ book reported.

The book pointed out that the Virginia court, "correctly recognized, however, that Pakistan's recognition of Shariah 'does not control the issue of the validity of the marriage under Virginia law.' Instead, the court applied Virginia law, which only granted comity according to the principles of the location celebrating the marriage, which was England."

There is also the California case of "Malak v. Malak," which involved a Lebanese court decision.

"The court determined, however, that the Lebanese order was enforceable because even though the Lebanese court had not explicitly applied the 'best interests of the child' standard, its decision aligned with California's 'best interests of the child' standard," the ACLJ book said.

An Emory University Law School publication noted that the "Malak" case was cited as precedent in other Muslim child custody cases.

Atlas Shrugs publisher and Islam analyst Pamela Geller says that Islamic law cited as the basis for any American court decision shows that the American legal system is turning a dangerous corner.

"It is setting a very dangerous precedent. Shariah law and U.S. law conflict in numerous ways, including on issues of freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and equality of rights for women. Allowing Shariah to be a determining factor in U.S. courtrooms threatens those rights for all of us," Geller said.



Read more: Islam makes inroads through U.S. courts http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=360081#ixzz1bsrdMbCo



Title: Use of Islamic law has been accepted in a civil case, a judge has ruled
Post by: akfools on October 27, 2011, 11:45:17 pm
Use of Islamic law has been accepted in a civil case, a judge has ruled


A state appeals court has ruled that a Hillsborough County Circuit judge can consider Islamic law to decide a civil case between a mosque and its former trustees.

The decision by the 2nd District Court of Appeal in Lakeland to decline the appeal of the Islamic Education Center of Tampa sends the case back to Hillsborough County Circuit Judge Richard A. Nielsen. Nielsen's decision in March to allow the case to proceed under "ecclesiastical Islamic law" drew national attention when the ruling was criticized by conservative bloggers.

The case has its roots in 2002, when the mosque ousted four of its founding members; those founding members later sued the mosque. One of the main issues of dispute was who would be responsible for how to spend $2.5 million Florida's Turnpike Enterprise had paid the mosque for 3.4 acres needed to widen Veterans Expressway.

When he made his March ruling, Nielsen said courts have ruled "that ecclesiastical law controls certain relations between members of a religious organization, whether a church, synagogue, temple or mosque."

The uproar over the ruling went overboard, said Lee Segal, a Clearwater attorney representing the ousted trustees. He said the ruling follows established legal precedent and does not mean Nielsen is allowing Islamic law to trump U.S. law.

"When the parties agree (before the trial that) they are bound to Islamic law, they can be bound to Islamic law," Segal said. "As long as what you are agreeing to doesn't violate the constitution of the United States, you can apply any type of law."

Though the issue of Islamic law has garnered attention, the legal fight over the lawsuit is complicated, with much of it revolving around the arbitration process.

On Monday, Paul Thanasides, the attorney for the mosque, filed a new motion to dismiss the case because of lack of jurisdiction.

http://www2.tbo.com/news/breaking-news/2011/oct/25/menewso5-use-of-islamic-law-ok-in-civil-case-judge-ar-274429/


Title: Re: Use of Islamic law has been accepted in a civil case, a judge has ruled
Post by: akfools on October 28, 2011, 12:10:50 am
Judge Rules American Courts Can Use Sharia Law (Video)

http://video.foxnews.com/v/1242110053001/judge-rules-american-courts-can-use-sharia-law/?playlist_id=87485


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on October 28, 2011, 03:16:59 pm
I disagree with this in that US law is sufficient to handle a given case. If the parties involved are all arguing over some religious aspect, and are demanding relief of some kind, the courts reserve the right to dismiss the case and refuse to hear it.

The judge I suspect could also recommend arbitration, which is private and outside the courts. Done. So we need to pay attention to just what the courts are saying or ruling on. If the court agrees to hear a case, using Sharia, instead of US law to make a ruling, that's wrong. Parties who insist on Sharia, Judaism, Christianity, etc. should be encouraged to take their case outside the US court system, being a religious matter, and not a secular one.

If your seeking relief in the US court system, then all parties involved must agree to the rules of that system, and not decided to bring in your own set of laws. That just makes no sense. Regardless of religion, Caesar demands allegience above any religious beliefs, so it's strange that Sharia is being allowed in. Surely this won't go anywhere outside of very basic lower court cases, but even then, it shouldn't happen.

The US courts and America itself is secular, which is why we have freedom of religion, but the government itself is secular, and supposedly by law is not allowed to discriminate against religion, so by design it has traditionally not recognized religious defenses in courts, such as medical treatment cases of children. It's a double-standard to allow Sharia, and opens a huge legal can of worms, which in the end may be their goal.

In order for there to be no discrimination against any particular religion, including Sharia, then the courts must accept ALL religions. Let people think about the implications of that for awhile.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on December 15, 2011, 05:30:59 am
The Simpsons holiday episode mocks shariah law in the U.S.

did you really expect anything less?  ::)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=za9mmnx9lGY

Last night’s holiday episode of The Simpsons portrayed the family years into the future, when grown-up Lisa’s man Milhouse complains of Christmas allergies and heads to Michigan, which she says is “under shariah law.”

Milhouse is shown on the University of Michigan campus wearing a niqab, which shows only his eyes.

Dearborn, Michigan is the home of the largest Arab population outside of the Middle East and the location of the now-controversial Muslim reality show All-American Muslim.

It’s not under Islamic law now, and as long as the American legal system continues to operate under the Constitution, won’t be under Islamic law in decades to come.

Still, conservative politicians concerned about Islam in America bring up the threat of shariah, and anti-shariah laws have been proposed in at least seven states in the past year or so, including in Texas. Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich brought up shariah early in the campaign for president this spring, but candidates have since stayed away from the issue for the most part.

The Council on American Islamic Relations posted The Simpsons clip, saying the episode jokes such “anti-shariah hysteria”
http://blog.chron.com/believeitornot/2011/12/the-simpsons-holiday-episode-mocks-shariah-law-in-the-u-s/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on December 19, 2011, 06:47:02 am
Islamic world targets First Amendment
Muslim group tells Clinton: Defamation of Islam must be prevented ... in America


As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton welcomes Secretary General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu to Washington this week, it is critical that Americans pay attention to what these two leaders intend to do. From 12 to 14 December 2011, working teams from the Department of State (DoS) and the OIC are going to discuss implementation mechanisms that could impose limits on freedom of speech and expression.

The OIC's purpose, as stated explicitly in its April 2011 4th Annual Report on Islamophobia, is to criminalize "incitement to hatred and violence on religious grounds." Incitement is to be defined by applying the "test of consequences" to speech. Under this twisted perversion of falsely "yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater," it doesn’t matter what someone actually says — or even whether it is true or not; if someone else commits violence and says it's because of something that person said, the speaker will be held criminally liable.

Read the whole story at BigPeace
http://bigpeace.com/clopez/2011/12/17/islamic-world-tells-clinton-defamation-of-islam-must-be-prevented-in-america/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on December 19, 2011, 01:34:17 pm
Quote
The OIC's purpose, as stated explicitly in its April 2011 4th Annual Report on Islamophobia, is to criminalize "incitement to hatred and violence on religious grounds."

So how do they define "hatred" and "violence", and who is it that defines it? Typical. And people are all bothered by "bible thumpers"! They really need to understand the difference between how Christians deal with the "infidels", and how Islam deals with them. Christians avoid them, while Islam removes them whenever they find them. Islam lives by "an eye for an eye", and believe in dealing with some issues with the point of the sword.

Islam, and Judaism, hates their enemies, while Christians love their enemies.

Islam is currently "invading" the US from the inside, just like Latinos are in the southwest, by using American law against any who try to block them. The real question that must be asked though is who is funding and pushing these groups? It's not what the public is told. The whole point of all this is delusion, a lie, as to what is really going on in the world. Islam, The RCC, Mexican illegals, etc., it's none of that. That is just a distraction from the real spiritual war that is going on.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on December 20, 2011, 06:40:31 am
'Bashing' Islam to be crime in U.S.?

Bloggers and talkers beware: The Obama administration is working to make Islam "bashing" a crime.

Clare Lopez is a former CIA operations officer and strategic policy and intelligence expert with a focus on Middle East, homeland security, national defense and counterterrorism issues. In an article published at Big Peace last week, she warned Americans to pay close attention to what Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Secretary General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu did while in Washington last week.

According to blogger Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs, "The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is a religious and political organization. Close to the Muslim World League of the Muslim Brotherhood, it shares the Brotherhood's strategic and cultural vision: that of a universal religious community, the Ummah, based upon the Koran, the Sunna, and the canonical orthodoxy of Sharia. The OIC represents 56 countries and the Palestinian Authority (considered a state), the whole constituting the universal Ummah with a community of more than one billion three to six hundred million Muslims."

Back to Lopez: "From 12 to 14 December 2011, working teams from the Department of State and the OIC are going to discuss implementation mechanisms that could impose limits on freedom of speech and expression. The OIC's purpose, as stated explicitly in its April 2011 Annual Report on Islamophobia, is to criminalize 'incitement to hatred and violence on religious grounds.'"

In a follow-up, CNS News reported that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton last Wednesday "told the closing session of the meeting at the State Department that the adoption of [United Nations] Resolution 16/18 had 'ended 10 years of divisive debate where people were not listening to each other anymore.'"

"Critics have been doubtful about the OIC's sincerity, however," CNS News reports, "noting the top priority it has given to the drive to curb speech and actions [that] it views as insulting to Islam – ranging from the Mohammed cartoons and threats to burn the Qur'an to anti-shari'a campaigns and post-9/11 security profiling."

"U.N. Resolution 16/18, formally entitled 'Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons based on religion or belief,' is championed by the Obama administration," the report concludes.

Read more: 'Bashing' Islam to be crime in U.S.? http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=379225#ixzz1h4u39xwZ


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on December 20, 2011, 08:15:54 am
U.N. Adopts ‘Religious Intolerance’ Resolution Championed by Obama Administration

The U.N. General Assembly on Monday adopted a resolution condemning the stereotyping, negative profiling and stigmatization of people based on their religion, and urging countries to take effective steps “to address and combat such incidents.”

No member state called for a recorded vote on the text, which was as a result adopted “by consensus.”

The resolution, an initiative of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), is based on one passed by the U.N.’s Human Rights Council in Geneva last spring. The State Department last week hosted a meeting to discuss ways of “implementing” it.

Every year since 1999 the OIC has steered through the U.N.’s human rights apparatus a resolution condemning the “defamation of religion,” which for the bloc of 56 Muslim states covered incidents ranging from satirizing Mohammed in a newspaper cartoon to criticism of shari’a and post-9/11 security check profiling.

Critics regard the measure as an attempt to outlaw valid and critical scrutiny of Islamic teachings, as some OIC states do through controversial blasphemy laws at home.

Strongly opposed by mostly Western democracies, the divisive “defamation” resolution received a dwindling number of votes each year, with the margin of success falling from 57 votes in 2007 to 19 in 2009 and just 12 last year.

This year’s text was a departure, in that it dropped the “defamation” language and included a paragraph that reaffirms “the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information can play in strengthening democracy and combating religious intolerance.”

The nod to freedom of expression won the resolution the support of the U.S. and other democracies, with the Obama administration and others hailing it as a breakthrough after years of acrimonious debate.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took the opportunity of the State Department-hosted talks with foreign governments, the OIC and other international bodies last week to stress the importance of freedom of speech in the U.S. She argued that “the best way to treat offensive speech is by people either ignoring it or combating it with good arguments and good speech that overwhelms it.”

Saudi initiative singled out for praise

Nonetheless, the resolution adopted in New York on Monday does contain elements that concern some free speech and religious freedom advocates.

It calls on states “to take effective measures to ensure that public functionaries in the conduct of their public duties do not discriminate against an individual on the basis of religion or belief.”

Governments also are expected to make “a strong effort to counter religious profiling, which is understood to be the invidious use of religion as a criterion in conducting questionings, searches and other law enforcement investigative procedures.”

“Effective measures” to counter cases of religious stereotyping and stigmatization include education, interfaith dialogue and “training of government officials.”

And in the worst cases, those of “incitement to imminent violence” based on religion, the resolution calls on countries to implement “measures to criminalize” such behavior.

Also of note is the fact that the resolution singles out for praise only one interfaith initiative – and that initiative was established by Saudi Arabia, a leading OIC member-state with a long history of enforcing blasphemy laws.

The resolution commends the establishment of the King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz International Centre for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue, “acknowledging the important role that the Centre is expected to play as a platform for the enhancement of interreligious and intercultural dialogue.”

(Another clause welcomes “all international, regional and national initiatives aimed at promoting interreligious, intercultural and interfaith harmony and combating discrimination against individuals on the basis of religion or belief,” but the Saudi one alone is recognized specifically.)

Monday’s adoption of the text took place without a debate. Earlier, when a General Assembly committee considered the draft resolution, a delegate of Poland – speaking on behalf of the European Union – raised concern about the fact it mentioned by name only one center for interreligious dialogue, even though there were numerous such facilities around the world.

The E.U. was also concerned that the resolution considered the world as “monolithic religious blocs,” while religious hatred was primarily a threat to individual freedoms, he said.

Despite those concerns, the E.U. was prepared to join consensus and support the resolution.

The U.S. representative, John Sammis, said the United States was pleased to join the consensus.

It had been unable to support previous resolutions of this type because they sought to restrict expression and were “counterproductive,” he said, but the new one upholds respect for universal human rights.

“The United States welcomes all international, national, and regional initiatives that respect universal human rights and that recommend these types of measures to promote interfaith harmony and combating discrimination against individuals on the basis of religion or belief,” Sammis said. “Such initiatives can promote respect for religious diversity in a manner that respects universal human rights.”

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/un-adopts-religious-intolerance-resolution-championed-obama-administration



Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on January 11, 2012, 08:04:02 am
Court: Oklahoma can't enforce Sharia law ban


READ THAT AGAIN!!!

Court: Oklahoma can't enforce Sharia law ban


- A federal appeals court upheld an injunction against a voter-approved ban on Islamic law in Oklahoma on Tuesday, saying it likely violated the U.S. Constitution by discriminating against religion.

A three-member panel of the Denver-based U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that the rights of plaintiff Muneer Awad, a Muslim man living in Oklahoma City, likely would be violated if the ban on Sharia law takes effect.

The decision upholds the ruling of a lower federal court.

"While the public has an interest in the will of the voters being carried out ... the public has a more profound and long-term interest in upholding an individual's constitutional rights," the appeals court said in a 37-page written decision.

The Washington, D.C.-based Council on American-Islamic Relations welcomed the ruling, calling it "a victory for the Constitution and for the right of all Americans to freely practice their faith."

Oklahoma's "Save Our State Amendment," which was approved by 70 percent of state voters in 2010, bars Oklahoma state courts from considering or using Sharia law.

The lawsuit challenging the measure was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of Awad, who is director of the Oklahoma chapter of CAIR.

A federal judge in Oklahoma City issued a court order in November 2010 barring the measure from taking effect while the case is under review, finding a substantial likelihood that Awad would prevail on the merits.

The Council said the Oklahoma amendment is among 20 similar proposed laws introduced in state legislatures nationwide.

Defenders of the amendment say they want to prevent foreign laws in general, and Islamic Sharia law in particular, from overriding state or U.S. laws.

But foes of the Oklahoma measure, also called State Question 755, have argued that it stigmatizes Islam and its adherents and violates the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment prohibition against the government favoring one religion over another.

State Senator Anthony Sykes, one of the measure's sponsors, called the decision an attempt "to silence the voice of 70 percent of Oklahoma voters. At some point we have to decide whether this is a country of, by and for the judges, or of, by and for the people."

Opponents also say it could nullify wills or legal contracts between Muslims because they incorporate by reference specific elements of Islamic prophetic traditions.

http://news.yahoo.com/court-oklahoma-cant-enforce-sharia-law-ban-011240179.html


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on January 11, 2012, 09:57:39 am
What??

How in the world is NOT enforcing Sharia Law being UNCONSTITIONAL?? Wouldn't it be UNCONSTITIONAL to DO just that, b/c it would be FAVORING the Islam religion over other religions ???


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on January 12, 2012, 02:08:14 am
Quote
But foes of the Oklahoma measure, also called State Question 755, have argued that it stigmatizes Islam and its adherents and violates the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment prohibition against the government favoring one religion over another.

I can't believe they even have the nerve to even suggest such drivel! Wow. This is insanity and a clear and open attempt to use the US law against itself, just as I have said they do.

THere is no way this is a 1st amendment issue. Not even close.

The citizens aren't saying they can't practice their religion, what they said was citizens won't allow a single relighion to be the law. No religion gets to have it's laws in place of civil law. Not even Christians get that. And the US is considered Christian!

They can use Sharia amongst themselves no problem in the Islamic communitites, but they cannot get the US courts to use Sharia in place of US law. No way.

Quote
Opponents also say it could nullify wills or legal contracts between Muslims because they incorporate by reference specific elements of Islamic prophetic traditions.

Then they need to change their paperwork! What kind of legal advice did they get designing a US legal document around laws the US doesn't even recognize?

That is an obvious attempt to make the US an Islamic state, just like they are doing around the world, and world better wake up, or the next thing they know, they'll be waking up to the call to prayer every 5am.

This is insanity!


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on January 20, 2012, 08:38:03 am
CAIR: Islamic Sharia Law is Similar to Catholic, Jewish Laws

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) says Islamic Sharia law is comparable to Catholic canon law and Jewish Halacha -- the Jewish law that governs everything from lighting candles to "kosher" dietary laws.

In a news release issued Tuesday, CAIR National Legislative Director Corey Saylor defended Sharia, saying it literally means “path,” and is “a set of interpretations that are dynamic and intended to accommodate the time, place and laws -- like the U.S. Constitution -- of a particular community.”

“Sharia is interpreted differently based on its surroundings. Sharia mandates Muslims to respect the law of the land in which they live. Many familiar with Islam note that Sharia is similar to Catholic Canon law and Jewish Halacha law,” the release said.

The American Muslim group issued the statement to criticize GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich, who was asked at an event in Columbia, S.C., whether he would ever support a Muslim candidate for president.

“It would depend entirely on whether they would commit in public to give up Sharia,” Gingrich said.

"If they are a modern person integrated in the modern world and they are prepared to recognize all religions, that’s one thing. On the other hand, if they’re Saudis, who demand that we respect them while they refuse to allow Christians to worship in Saudi Arabia, that's something different,” Gingrich added.

CAIR lashed out at Gingrich, saying his “outdated political ideas look backward to a time when Catholics and Jews were vilified and their faiths called a threat.”

Saylor said Sharia “teaches marital fidelity, generous charity and a thirst for knowledge” and includes guidelines for “praying, fasting, giving charity, helping the needy, feeding the hungry and caring for the environment.”

But human rights advocates say that under Islamic Sharia law, those who drink alcohol or **** can be whipped, thieves’ hands can be chopped off and husbands are allowed to beat their wives without punishment.

Worse, according to the U.S. State Department, in countries like Iran, whose constitution explicitly states all laws and regulations are to be based on Sharia law, and Saudi Arabia, where religious police enforce Sharia law, conversion from Islam to another religion is punishable by death.

In fact, in its 2011 country report on Pakistan, the State Department noted that a Sharia court in Pakistan had sentenced Asia Bibi, a Pakistani Christian woman, to death last year for blasphemy against Islam. She is currently in prison awaiting execution.

In its 2011 report on Saudi Arabia, the U.S. government said women in Saudi Arabia were routinely punished under Sharia law -- for being raped.

“**** is a punishable criminal offense under Sharia with a wide range of penalties from flogging to execution. Generally the government enforced the law based on its interpretation of Sharia, and courts punished both the victim and the perpetrator,” the  State Department said.

“The government views marital relations between spouses as contractual and did not recognize spousal ****. By law a female **** victim is at fault for illegal ‘mixing of genders’ and is punished along with the perpetrator.”

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/cair-islamic-sharia-law-similar-catholic-jewish-laws-1


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on January 20, 2012, 02:08:50 pm
There is a big difference between Islam, and Jews and Catholics. Only Islam wants the US courts to go by Sharia, whereas Jews and Catholics go by US law, and have to deal with their religious leaders later so to speak. Yes, Jews and Catholics are active politcally, but no more than any other group that lobbies Washington. They haven't asked the US to observe Judaism or Catholicism as a practice instead of US law. Some judges no doubt have ruled based on a religious basis, but only as US law allows them leeway from the bench.

Islam is wanting the US to look the other way because Muslims want to practice their religion irregardless of US law. Christians have wanted religious freedoms and autonomy since before the US was founded, but it hasn't happened yet, not in this world. What makes them think it's now okay for Islam? Their attitude goes against even the UN mandates on discrimination issues. It flys in the face of the NWO "let's all be one big family" mantra. I'm not sure what to make of it, because it clearly presents issues if they keep it up. Seems like a clash in the end between Islam and the NWO policy of nobody's religion is bigger than the NWO.


Title: Sharia Court in India Orders Expulsion of Christians from Kashmir
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 05, 2012, 11:18:29 pm
http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2012/02/05/sharia-court-in-india-orders-expulsion-of-christians-from-kashmir/

Posted on February 5, 2012 by creeping


via Sharia Court in India Orders Expulsion of Christians | NCRegister.com.
 
The sharia court in Muslim-majority Kashmir has no constitutional or legal authority. But its recent verdict ordering the expulsion of five Christians from the troubled Indian side of Kashmir has sent alarm bells ringing among Christians in India.
 
Apart from ordering the expulsion of the Christians, the court also directed the government of Jammu and Kashmir to take over the management of the Christian missionary schools besides monitoring their activities.
 
Those ordered to be expelled include Father Jim Borst of the Dutch Mill Hill Missionaries, who has been based in Kashmir since 1963.
 
“This is much more than conversion. It is humiliating and certainly threatening for us,” Bishop Peter Celestine Elampassery of Jammu-Srinagar told the Register Jan. 27, reacting to the verdict.
 
Srinagar is the capital of the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir, which is nestled in the Himalayas.
 
On Jan. 19, the court ordered the expulsion of Father Borst, along with two Protestant pastors and their wives, accusing them of “luring the (Kashmir) valley Muslims to Christianity.”
 
The verdict focused more on Pastor Chander Mani Khanna of the Protestant All Saints Church at Srinagar and pronounced him guilty of conversion. The pastor of the Church of North India had been arrested in November by state police on the dubious charge of “fomenting communal trouble” after Muslim groups pressed charges against him. Though the civil court released him on bail, the sharia court went ahead with its own trial.
 
“Khanna and his associates have been found guilty of spreading communal disaffection and were involved in immoral activities. They are ordered to be expelled from the state,” deputy grand mufti of Jammu and Kashmir, Nasir-ul-Islam, said Jan.19 while reading the verdict of the sharia court.
 
Father Borst, a well-known retreat preacher, runs the Good Shepherd School at Pulwama. The school had been partially burnt during widespread protests against the desecration of the Quran in the United States during the 9/11 anniversary in 2010.
 
Church leaders, Christians groups and Kashmiri Christians all have expressed alarm over the sharia court pronouncement and the subsequent Christian bashing in the local media, despite the Kashmir Valley having fewer than 400 Christians among 4 million Muslims.
 
“Kashmir Zealots Push Christians Into Valley of Fear” read the headline in The Times of India, the nation’s largest English daily, on Jan. 23.
 
The report said that even Juan Marcos Troia, an Argentinian football coach developing soccer in Kashmir and training local youth, is now facing the heat. State football association officials have questioned him about the funding for his clubs. While a whisper campaign is on against the “Christian” coach by Islamic fundamentalists, his house has already been vandalized.
 
“This is not a good development,” Bishop Elampassery said while on a visit to the Muslim heartland of Srinagar. “In the 1970s, they targeted Sikhs, and from 1980 they went after the Hindus. It looks like now they want to target us.”
 
In the entire Kashmir Valley, there are only about half a dozen churches, half a dozen Christian schools and a couple of Christian hospitals.
 
“What is going on there right now is the plan to scare away the remaining Christians from Kashmir. They want to make it an exclusive Muslim area,” asserted Predhuman Joseph Dhar, a Kashmiri Catholic from a Hindu background.
 
Dhar, a journalist, teacher and scholar who has translated the Bible into Kashmiri, recalled that he fled Kashmir with his family in January 1990 after mosques across the Kashmir Valley began using their loudspeakers to order Hindus to leave the Muslim-majority region.
 
Subsequently, more than 400,000 Hindus in Kashmir fled the region to the Hindu-majority Jammu and other parts of India. Though he has been a Catholic since 1984, when his entire family of six embraced the Christian faith, Dhar too fled Kashmir.
 
“Right now there are only less than 100 Christians of Kashmiri origin in the valley. Others are migrant Christians,” pointed out Dhar.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on February 08, 2012, 04:36:12 am
Billboard offers defense to Shariah threats
'They don't want Americans to know truth about gendercide, honor killings, stonings'


(http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/02/ShariahWarning32-340x100.jpg)

A patriotic organization is launching a billboard campaign intended to undermine the efforts to advertise and promote Shariah, the Islamic law that calls for beheadings, executions and amputations, across America.

The group, Stop Islamization of Nations, is buying ad space for a billboard calling on people to learn the dark side of Shariah law.

The effort’s leader, Pamela Geller, says her group, has one real purpose – to counter the impact of the pro-Shariah billboard campaign of the Islamic Circle or North America, an alleged Muslim Brotherhood front organization.

“ICNA is a Muslim Brotherhood group, according to a captured internal document of the Brotherhood. Muslim Brotherhood groups in America are trying to norm Shariah, mainstream Shariah,” Geller warned.

The billboard will lead people to the Refuge from Islam site.

rest: http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/billboard-offers-defense-to-shariah-threats/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on February 09, 2012, 06:25:19 am
Kansans called to stand against sharia

A Kansas-based pro-family organization is encouraging people of faith to support a legislative effort to keep sharia law out of The Sunflower State.

A radical Islamic organization known as the Islamic Circle of North America has lately been running paid radio commercials and billboards in Kansas City to promote its "National Sharia Campaign." It offers a hotline and a website for people who want to know more about sharia law and Islam as a whole.

But Donna Lippoldt of the Culture Shield Network (CSN) says the campaign is nothing more than Islamic propaganda aimed at whitewashing the negative aspects of Islam.

"Sharia law says that a man can just declare that he is divorced, and a woman has no recourse; a man can have multiple wives, and a woman just has to be silenced and abused," Lippoldt notes.

She suspects that the Islamists are trying to head off Senate Bill 2087, which would prohibit the use of any foreign law in Kansas. However, she believes the measure can withstand the legal challenge that befell similar legislation in Oklahoma last year, when the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the American Civil Liberties Union successfully blocked implementation of an anti-sharia law that 70 percent of voters approved.

"We believe that our Kansas Constitution will back us up," the CSN founder asserts. "We are aware of what happened in Oklahoma, but I will tell you that there have been people in our capital, in Topeka, from the Muslim faith trying to influence the legislators to be very sensitive and that they do want sharia law implemented in Kansas."

So Lippoldt is calling on people of faith to stand against sharia in the name of Jesus Christ.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=1532206


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on February 09, 2012, 12:17:10 pm
Quote
the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the American Civil Liberties Union successfully blocked implementation of an anti-sharia law that 70 percent of voters approved.

How is that even possible under the Constitution? Clearly America isn't being run as a constitutional republic any longer.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on February 09, 2012, 12:23:56 pm
How is that even possible under the Constitution? Clearly America isn't being run as a constitutional republic any longer.

we havent been a constitutional republic  in decages...  :'(


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on February 09, 2012, 12:31:21 pm
"decages"...I like that word!  ;)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on February 25, 2012, 06:10:54 pm
Penn Judge: Muslims Allowed to Attack People for Insulting Mohammad

COMMENTARY | Jonathon Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, reports on a disturbing case in which a state judge in Pennsylvania threw out an assault case involving a Muslim attacking an atheist for insulting the Prophet Muhammad.

Judge Mark Martin, an Iraq war veteran and a convert to Islam, threw the case out in what appears to be an invocation of Sharia law.

The incident occurred at the Mechanicsburg, Pa., Halloween parade where Ernie Perce, an atheist activist, marched as a zombie Muhammad. Talaag Elbayomy, a Muslim, attacked Perce, and he was arrested by police.

Judge Martin threw the case out on the grounds that Elbayomy was obligated to attack Perce because of his culture and religion. Judge Martin stated that the First Amendment of the Constitution does not permit people to provoke other people. He also called Perce, the plaintiff in the case, a "doofus." In effect, Perce was the perpetrator of the assault, in Judge Martin's view, and Elbayomy the innocent. The Sharia law that the Muslim attacker followed trumped the First Amendment.

Words almost fail.

The Washington Post recently reported on an appeals court decision to maintain an injunction to stop the implementation of an amendment to the Oklahoma state constitution that bans the use of Sharia law in state courts. The excuse the court gave was that there was no documented case of Sharia law being invoked in an American court. Judge Martin would seem to have provided that example, which should provide fodder for the argument as the case goes through the federal courts.

READ MORE:  http://news.yahoo.com/penn-judge-muslims-allowed-attack-people-insulting-mohammad-210000330.html


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on February 29, 2012, 08:37:52 pm
Number of American mosques rising despite protests aimed at Muslim houses of worship 
Researchers find 2,106 Islamic centers, compared to 1,209 in 2000


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/number-american-mosques-rising-protests-aimed-muslim-houses-worship-article-1.1030973#ixzz1npSAuK55


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 29, 2012, 09:19:30 pm
Number of American mosques rising despite protests aimed at Muslim houses of worship 
Researchers find 2,106 Islamic centers, compared to 1,209 in 2000


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/number-american-mosques-rising-protests-aimed-muslim-houses-worship-article-1.1030973#ixzz1npSAuK55


B/w 2000 and now is when the Emergent Church has gained prominence in the modern-day church - coincidence that it was during this time when EC leaders like Warren and Hybels have pushed Chrislam/ecumenism is also the same time period when mosques have nearly doubled in this country?


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on March 02, 2012, 08:42:39 am
Penn Judge: Muslims Allowed to Attack People for Insulting Mohammad

COMMENTARY | Jonathon Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, reports on a disturbing case in which a state judge in Pennsylvania threw out an assault case involving a Muslim attacking an atheist for insulting the Prophet Muhammad.

Judge Mark Martin, an Iraq war veteran and a convert to Islam, threw the case out in what appears to be an invocation of Sharia law.

The incident occurred at the Mechanicsburg, Pa., Halloween parade where Ernie Perce, an atheist activist, marched as a zombie Muhammad. Talaag Elbayomy, a Muslim, attacked Perce, and he was arrested by police.

Judge Martin threw the case out on the grounds that Elbayomy was obligated to attack Perce because of his culture and religion. Judge Martin stated that the First Amendment of the Constitution does not permit people to provoke other people. He also called Perce, the plaintiff in the case, a "doofus." In effect, Perce was the perpetrator of the assault, in Judge Martin's view, and Elbayomy the innocent. The Sharia law that the Muslim attacker followed trumped the First Amendment.

Words almost fail.

The Washington Post recently reported on an appeals court decision to maintain an injunction to stop the implementation of an amendment to the Oklahoma state constitution that bans the use of Sharia law in state courts. The excuse the court gave was that there was no documented case of Sharia law being invoked in an American court. Judge Martin would seem to have provided that example, which should provide fodder for the argument as the case goes through the federal courts.

READ MORE:  http://news.yahoo.com/penn-judge-muslims-allowed-attack-people-insulting-mohammad-210000330.html

Expose Shariah, get threatened ...
Zombie Muhammad attack victim documents 471 warnings


A Pennsylvania man who mocked Muhammad at a parade for atheists and was confronted physically by a Muslim who assumed it was illegal in America to insult Islam’s founder says he’s been threatened 471 times for making public the fact that a Muslim judge warned him his opinion was unprotected by the First Amendment.

The dispute stems from a filmed confrontation between American Atheists’ Pennsylvania State Director Ernest Perce V and Talaag Elbayomy, a Muslim. Elbayomy was accused of storming out of the crowd and assaulting Perce, grabbing a sign around his neck and pulling until the strings choked him.

Perce had attired himself as a “zombie Muhammad” for the event, which enraged Elbayomy.

But then a Muslim judge in Pennsylvania scolded Perce for offending Islam at the Oct. 11, 2011, parade in Mechanicsburg, Pa., called him a doofus and accused him of “using the First Amendment” to madden Muslims. The judge then dismissed charges filed by police against the Muslim defendant.

It was District Judge Mark Martin who brought a Quran to court and told the alleged victim, “I think you misinterpreted a couple of things. So before you start mocking somebody else’s religion, you might want to find out a little more about it. It kind of makes you look like a doofus.”

The judge added, “I think our forefathers intended to use the First Amendment so we can speak with our mind, not to p— off other people and cultures – which is what you did.”

Elbayomy – who said he believed it was illegal to mock Muhammad – was charged with harassment. He denied touching Perce at trial, but police officers said Elbayomy admitted grabbing Perce’s sign and beard the night of the incident.

The following is a dark and distorted video posted of the alleged attack:

rest + Vids: http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/expose-shariah-get-threatened/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on March 05, 2012, 11:17:38 am
States must choose -- sharia or Constitution?

A pro-national defense activist says the recent decision by Pennsylvania judge Mark Martin to throw out an assault charge against a Muslim man based on sharia law is the perfect illustration of why states must enact statutes banning foreign law from American jurisprudence.

Martin recently dismissed charges brought against an Islamic man who attacked an atheist who was marching in a Halloween parade dressed like Mohammed. Martin has been accused of basing his decision on Islamic sharia law rather than on the U.S. Constitution.

Brigitte Gabriel, founder and president of ACT for America and author of They Must Be Stopped: Why We Must Defeat Radical Islam and How We Can Do It, says the Pennsylvania case is hardly an isolated incident.

"Actually [there are] 51 cases in American court rooms where Islamic law was considered above the Constitution of the United States," Gabriel says, "especially in domestic law and in family law. And that's simply unacceptable."

Her organization is spearheading a petition urging states to pass legislation called "American Laws for American Courts" (ALAC).

"We do not single out sharia law," Gabriel says, "even though sharia law does come under the general law that we are introducing. And this is why, in the states where we passed it already -- Tennessee, Arizona and Louisiana -- those laws have not been challenged because the Islamic lobby knows that the law we are introducing is so bulletproof they cannot fight it."

Gabriel says 20 states are currently looking at ALAC, and she expects six states will pass it this year.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=1548492


Title: Islamist fighters call for Sharia law in Mali
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on March 14, 2012, 05:43:22 pm
http://news.yahoo.com/islamist-fighters-call-sharia-law-mali-144233731.html

3/13/12

An armed Islamist group led by an influential Tuareg rebel fighting for autonomy in northern Mali called for the national imposition of Sharia law in a video seen Tuesday by AFP.

"It is an obligation for us to fight for the application of Sharia (Islamic law) in Mali," said Cheikh Ag Aoussa, a spokesman of the movement Ancar Dine, which means 'Defenders of Islam' in Arabic.

Ag Aoussa is the right-hand man of its leader Iyad Ag Ghaly, who is shown in the 13-minute video inspecting fighters and leading them in prayer.

Ag Ghaly was one of the most prominent figures of a Tuareg rebellion in the 1990s and is thought to have links with a branch of Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) which is led by his cousin Hamada Ag Hama.

more


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on March 16, 2012, 07:38:24 am
I was listening to the Quinn and Rose show the other day, and they were talking about how some American Indian tribe can kill 2 bald eagles for religious purposes. And they made the comment that because of that being allowed, a special circumstance for a minority people, that it could be used for the basis of allowing SHARIA better access into the court system.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on March 16, 2012, 04:28:00 pm
That would be a pretty weak argument, in my opinion. It's one thing to issue a permit, versus ruling in a US courtroom based on a foreign law. This is no different than native Alaskans being allowed to hunt whale. The difference is that one is based on your biological heitage, and the other is based on personal beliefs. Completely different.

Only certain people can be a Native American, but anybody can observe Sharia law.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on April 05, 2012, 05:53:17 am
Islamization of America accelerates
Exclusive: Pamela Geller cites 3 recent examples of 'capitulation' to Shariah


This has been a week of attempted advances for the Islamization of America (and Britain as well). Those who think it isn’t happening should ponder the case of Wegmans, a supermarket in Rochester, N.Y. Wegmans has put up a sign asking customers buying pork or alcohol not to use a particular checkout line when a Muslim teenager is on duty as the cashier. Only after public pressure from readers of my site AtlasShrugs.com and Robert Spencer’s JihadWatch.org did the sign come down.

This was more Islamization of the marketplace. This is a pattern. If you don’t want to handle meat that’s not halal, work for a Muslim butcher. Don’t take a job at Wegmans, Wal-Mart or Target. But this Muslim cashier’s special line was not about that. It was about imposing Islam on non-Muslims. Muslims are seeking special accommodations for a “special class.” (Islamic law places Muslims in a special class, giving them rights that non-Muslims do not have.)

This was part of a systematic campaign to impose the Shariah on the secular marketplace. Muslim workers suing Disney over its 60-year-old dress code or Muslim cashiers strong-arming Wal-Mart and Target over their refusal to handle meat that is not halal is all part of a much larger supremacist effort. It has succeeded in Europe, which is all but doomed. They mean to replicate it here. This is well-documented in my book, “Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance.”

When I posted about Wegmans’ initial capitulation to Shariah at AtlasShrugs.com, I received an email from a man with a disability that requires him to use a service dog. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, a disabled person with a service dog must be allowed public accommodation and admittance. But when he entered a kabob restaurant in Virginia, the Muslim owner immediately confronted him, made a scene about his dog and demanded that he leave. (Muslims consider dogs unclean.) Only after the disabled man told him about the ADA and threatened to file a complaint did he reluctantly allow him to stay. He had to give in, but Muslim cab drivers in Europe have already refused blind passengers with seeing-eye dogs, and Islamic supremacist groups are certain to demand exemption from the ADA sooner or later.

Meanwhile, Robert Spencer has a groundbreaking book coming out later this month: “Did Muhammad Exist?” It is a bombshell. I have read it, and I can tell you that it shatters every conventional and accepted myth on the history of Muhammad and Islam. Is it any wonder Islamic supremacists want to squash it? Spencer was scheduled to speak at a lunch hosted by MEF at the offices of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel (Kramer Levin), a law firm in New York City. But the Hamas front known as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) heard about it and sicced their dogs on Kramer Levin, demanding the enforcement of the blasphemy laws under the Shariah (Islamic law considers any critical examination of Islam to be blasphemous and subject to the death penalty), and it worked. Kramer Levin canceled the Spencer event. Kramer Levin readily acquiesced to the prohibition of the truth by Islamic supremacists. Imagine this, an American law firm, no less.

Meanwhile, over in Britain, the BBC has refused to screen “Can We Talk About This?” a play about the Islamic threat to the freedom of speech. Mark Thompson, the BBC’s director-general, has admitted in the past that there is a “growing nervousness about discussion about Islam,” but his spokesman denied that this refusal had anything to do with the play’s “content or themes.”

Does he really expect anyone to believe that?

The dhimmi BBC should have its license revoked, pulled. They are undeserving. Certainly all U.K. taxpayer dollars should be withdrawn. The media are too important in the information battle space to be allowed to become a tool of Islamic supremacists. The media are our first line of defense in the war against free speech, and they capitulate without a whimper. This is self-enforcement of Shariah.

Islamic supremacists are more assertive in the United States and Europe than they ever have been before. They’re building large mega-mosques in communities where the local Muslims can neither fill nor afford them. They’re demanding – and receiving – special privileges for Muslims in workplaces and special installations for Islamic prayers in public universities, as well as in airports and other public facilities.

They’re bringing back prayer in public schools – but only for Muslims, while insisting that Christians, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists can assert no such constitutional privilege under our law: They are seeking special legal status for Islam. They’re shutting down the national debate we urgently need to have about Islam and Islamization, demonizing anyone who suggests any anti-terror measure or who asks the Muslim community in the U.S. to do something effective about the jihadists and Islamic supremacists in their midst, labeling them “bigots,” “racists” and “Islamophobes.” They’re persecuting anti-jihad activists in the courtroom and private citizens who dare to report suspicious behavior by Muslims.

And worst of all, ignorant non-Muslims like the people in charge at Wegmans, Kramer Levin and the BBC are helping them attain their goals. But the fact that Wegmans reversed itself after an outcry from freedom fighters shows that resistance can be effective.

This craven capitulation to subversive elements must end. And if we act, we can end it.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/islamization-of-america-accelerates/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on April 06, 2012, 06:52:39 pm
http://news.yahoo.com/egypt-brotherhood-candidate-says-sharia-main-goal-061230332.html

Egypt Brotherhood candidate says sharia is main goal
Reuters – Thu, Apr 5, 2012

CAIRO (Reuters) - The Muslim Brotherhood's candidate for the Egyptian presidency, Khairat al-Shater, declared that introducing sharia law would be his "first and final" objective if he wins elections in May and June.
 
Making his first reported statements since the Brotherhood's surprise decision to field him in the elections, Shater also promised to reform the Interior Ministry which long played a leading role in suppressing dissent.
 
However, he denied he had struck a deal with the military on his candidacy, announced last Saturday, even though it may help candidates close to the old order of ousted President Hosni Mubarak by splintering the Islamist vote.
 
"Sharia was and will always be my first and final project and objective," Shater was quoted on Wednesday as telling a meeting of the Religious Association for Rights and Reform - a group of which he is a member, along with figures who belong to the hard-line Salafi school of Islam.

more


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on April 07, 2012, 06:40:35 am
Sharia has always been the main goal. All these so called "secular" dictatorships that existed are going away and sharia will be put in place. Replacing Sharia for anything is not a revolution for freedom, its a death sentence.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on April 07, 2012, 05:56:37 pm
Yeah, the Muslim countries will I think eventually be run by Sharia law. But ultimately they too will have to bow to the antichrist, so it really doesn't matter what each country is based on, they in the end follow the beast.

Think of the various religions outside of Christianity. They all have one thing in common, including churchianity, which is what the world does in general, and that is they operate based on works and a law, and not faith. All other religions have a law that must be followed (works) if your to make it to their version of the afterlife.

The same with governments. It's by the law, and they will be forced under penalty of death to follow the laws of the NWO and the beast.

"The just shall live by faith"


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 12, 2012, 07:29:45 pm
http://news.yahoo.com/kansas-lawmakers-pass-effective-ban-islamic-law-221706327.html

Kansas lawmakers pass effective ban on Islamic law
5/12/12

KANSAS CITY, Kansas (Reuters) - Kansas lawmakers have passed legislation intended to prevent the state courts or agencies from using Islamic or other non-U.S. laws in making decisions, a measure critics have blasted as an embarrassment to the state.
 
The legislation, which passed 33-3 in the state Senate on Friday and 120-0 previously in the House, is widely known in Kansas as the "Sharia bill," because the perceived goal of supporters is to keep Islamic code from being recognized in Kansas.
 
The bill was sent to Republican Governor Sam Brownback, who has not indicated whether he will sign it.
 
In interviews on Saturday, a supporter of the bill said it reassured foreigners in Kansas that state laws and the U.S. Constitution will protect them. But an opponent said the bill's real purpose is to hold Islam out for ridicule.

more


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 26, 2012, 09:32:42 am
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/15000-muslims-to-assemble-in-ct-in-support-of-sharia-against-islamophobia-this-weekend/

15,000 Muslims to Assemble in CT in Support of Sharia & Against ‘Islamophobia’ This Weekend

American Muslims who are disheartened by increasingly fervent attacks on sharia law are planning to assemble en masse this weekend to protest against what they fear are attempts to discriminate against their way of life. This weekend, 15,000 believers are expected to descent upon Hartford, Connecticut, for the 37th annual Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) convention.
 
The Muslim American Society-sponsored conference, entitled, “Defending Religious Freedom: Understanding Shariah,” will take place from May 26-28. According to Religion News Service, the event is the second largest annual event for Muslims in the U.S., behind the Islamic Society of North America’s annual gathering (the latter event attracts 30,000+ people).

more


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 26, 2012, 09:41:51 am
http://news.yahoo.com/kansas-lawmakers-pass-effective-ban-islamic-law-221706327.html

Kansas lawmakers pass effective ban on Islamic law
5/12/12

Gov. Brownback just signed this bill into law(don't know why it took him this long).
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/25/sam-brownback-shariah-law-kansas_n_1547164.html?ref=mostpopular,islam


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on June 20, 2012, 10:45:23 am
Battle against taxpayer-funded Shariah escalates
Marine moves fight up to full 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals


A battle against federal taxpayer subsidies for Shariah programs is being escalated to the full 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals after a three-judge panel of the court decided that a U.S. Marine had no right to challenge the government’s financial support for Islamic law.

The case has been brought by taxpayer Kevin J. Murray over the federal government’s multi-billion dollar bailout of AIG. It’s being handled by Robert Muise and David Yerushalmi of the American Freedom Law Center.

“It is one thing that our government felt compelled to bail out AIG after its fortunes were destroyed due to the company’s own recklessness and bad acts. It is quite another thing to use U.S. taxpayer dollars to promote and support AIG’s Shariah businesses,” Yerushalmi said.

The 6th Circuit’s panel of judges Alan Norris, Eric Clay and Allen Griffin ruled Murray lacked “standing” to challenge the constitutionality of the federal government’s use of taxpayer funds to support Shariah, the Islamic code of law based on the Quran and the teachings of Muhammad.

The complaint charges AIG used some of the bailout money to support the company’s Shariah-compliant insurance division, which even hires Muslims to advise on proper procedures.

Murray, a taxpayer and former combat Marine who served in Iraq, contends the federal government is not allowed to do that.

Muise argued it’s “well established that a federal taxpayer has standing to challenge the constitutionality of the impermissible use of federal funds appropriated and expended pursuant to Congress’ taxing and spending power.”

“Here, Congress appropriated billions of taxpayer funds to support AIG, and these funds are being used to support AIG’s Shariah-based activities in direct violation of the Establishment Clause,” he said.

At the time of the bailout, Muise said, AIG “was the world leader in promoting Shariah-compliant insurance products” and still is today.

The court conceded AIG subsidiaries “ensure the Shariah-compliance of its SCF products by obtaining consultation from Shariah Supervisory Committees.”

“The members of these committees are authorities in Shariah law and oversee the implementation of SCF products by reviewing AIG’s operations, supervising the development of SCF products, and evaluating the compliance of these products with Shariah law,” the court said.

The case was filed against Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and others.

The judges admitted that funds directed toward those subsidiaries come from U.S. taxpayers.

“Neither party disputes that Treasury Department financing supported all of AIG’s businesses, including the subsidiaries that marketed SCF products.”

AFLC’s petition seeks a full panel of the 6th Circuit for a review of the case because the three-judge decision “directly conflicts with U.S. Supreme Court and 6th Circuit precedent, and it effectively immunizes congressional spending from an as-applied constitutional challenge under the Establishment Clause. Additionally, AFLC is requesting en banc review because this case has exceptional public importance.”

The three-judge opinion argued federal TARP funds given to AIG were exempt from such challenges because the authorizing legislation didn’t consider giving money to aid religious outreaches such as AIG’s Shariah programs and the money was directed there by “executive” decisions.

Thus, the taxpayer lacked “standing” even to complain about the issue.

The judges came to their conclusion even though the court opinion admitted that shortly after the Treasury Department acquired an interest in AIG, the “department sponsored a conference entitled ‘Islamic Finance 101.’”

“The stated purpose of the conference was to provide government policymakers information about Islamic finance,” the judges said. “The presentation materials from the conference discussed topics such as the source of Islamic finance, how Islamic finance works and the market factors that caused its growth.”

The plaintiffs argued that Congress could or should have known its bailout money to AIG would go to Shariah “since AIG was well known as the leader in [Shariah complaint finance].”

But the judges that didn’t matter, contending the argument”falls well short of supporting a reasonable inference of congressional intention that a portion of the [federal bailout money] might support [Shariah].”

The appeals judges affirmed an earlier decision from a trial court judge who concluded the $153 million of U.S. taxpayer money spent supporting Islamic Shariah really isn’t anything worth mentioning.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/battle-against-taxpayer-funded-shariah-escalates/?cat_orig=us


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on June 27, 2012, 11:19:16 am
Jewish group 'giving in to Islamic intimidation'
Geller: Organization 'is effectively enforcing the blasphemy laws'


One of the largest Jewish organizations in America “is effectively enforcing the blasphemy laws under the Shariah,” according to a prominent author, blogger and rights activist.

Pamela Geller, who writes at Atlas Shrugs and is the author of “Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance,” made the comments to WND after the Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles canceled a speech she had planned to give.

“By canceling my talk, the LA Jewish Federation, one of America’s largest Jewish organizations, is effectively enforcing the blasphemy laws under the Shariah,” she said.

“This defines the modern dhimmi Jew. A leading Jewish organization felt more comfortable silencing a fellow Jew who was addressing the greatest threat that Israel and the Jewish people are facing than standing up to pressure from Islamic supremacist hate groups that are either part of jihad organizations or actively support the destruction of the state of Israel,” she said.

She said it was key to the issue to note that the reason for her visit to Los Angeles in the first place was a human rights town hall.

That event, “Summer Night for Human Rights,” was held with a panel of 10 former Muslims, “who for the first time could tell their harrowing and heartbreaking tales of leaving Islam, and the ostracism and often life-threatening dangers they faced for doing so,” Geller told WND.

Officials with the center declined a request from the Times to comment. But there had been pressure from Muslim interests against Geller’s event.

Officials with a California branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations had issued a statement warning the Jewish center over its decision to “offer a platform to the leader of an anti-Muslim hate group.”

“We are extremely shocked and alarmed to see a mainstream Jewish organization associating itself with one of the nation’s leading Islamophobes who doesn’t hesitate to share the podium with European racists and whose admirers apparently include Norwegian mass killer Anders Breivik,” said the Muslim organization of the Jewish group’s plans.

“Religious leaders and institutions have an increased and urgent responsibility to promote tolerance and mutual understanding among all Americans, instead of giving aid and comfort to fear-mongers like Geller.”

CAIR-California said the statement was on behalf of CAIR, the Islamic Circle of North America-Southern California, Islamic Shura Council of Southern California and others.

At the Huffington Post, Linda Milazzo wrote that as a Jew she was one who opposed Geller’s speech.

She wrote that, “While there is a small, non-majority percent of American Jews who may agree with Geller on certain issues, her presentation is so hate-filled and vulgar, she diminishes her opportunity for coalition and allegiance.”

She also noted that as Geller’s organization “bought poster board and Sharpies to make signs” in protest of the speech censorship, she made a sign blasting Geller.

“The Geller folks were unhappy with my messages and confiscated my sign,” she continued.

Geller, however, wrote on her site, “I’m not anti-Muslim. I love Muslims. I help Muslims. Our ‘Summer Night for Human Rights’ event featured a panoply of Muslim speakers who have suffered and deserve better.”

Geller’s book warns how “politically correct public officials” and other leaders are only too happy to accommodate the demands of Islamic supremacists.

She explains how the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated the Department of Justice, and the travesty of one 9/11 memorial that appears to recognize the criminal hijackers. She also discusses tax money that goes to Islamic schools and links between the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division and the Islamic Society of North America, CAIR and the Muslim Students Association.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/author-jewish-group-giving-in-to-islamic-intimidation/?cat_orig=us


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on June 27, 2012, 12:52:31 pm
 ::)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on July 29, 2012, 08:12:38 am
Judge in zombie Muhammad case reprimanded
Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board confirms 'private rebuke'


A judge in Pennsylvania who dismissed charges against a fellow Muslim who was accused of attacking an atheist parading as a zombie Muhammad has been rebuked by state judicial officials.

The state Judicial Conduct Board action concerned Magisterial Judge Mark Martin, of Cumberland County, who was involved in the case that developed last winter when American Atheists’ Pennsylvania State Director Ernest Perce V was marching in a parade, and allegedly was attacked.

A Muslim man, Talaag Elbayomy, was accused of storming out of the crowd and assaulting Perce, grabbing a sign around his neck and pulling until the strings choked him.

Perce had attired himself as a “zombie Muhammad” for the event, which enraged Elbayomy.

But then Martin, a Muslim judge, scolded Perce for offending Islam at an Oct. 11, 2011, parade in Mechanicsburg, Pa., called him a “doofus” and accused him of “using the First Amendment” to enrage Muslims. The judge then dismissed charges filed by police against the Muslim defendant.

It was Martin who brought a Quran to court and told the alleged victim, “I think you misinterpreted a couple of things. So before you start mocking somebody else’s religion, you might want to find out a little more about it. It kind of makes you look like a doofus.”

The judge added, “I think our forefathers intended to use the First Amendment so we can speak with our mind, not to p— off other people and cultures – which is what you did.”

Elbayomy – who said he believed it was illegal to mock Muhammad – was charged with harassment. He denied touching Perce at trial, but police officers said Elbayomy admitted grabbing Perce’s sign and beard the night of the incident.

A complaint was filed with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s Judicial Conduct Board by John P. McTernan, a pro-life activist and founder of Defend and Proclaim the Faith Ministry.

He told WND he got a response from Joseph A. Massa Jr., the chief counsel for the state board.

The letter said, “The board recently concluded its investigation regarding the complaint you filed against Magisterial District Judge Mark Martin, Cumberland County. The board voted to issue a letter of caution to Judge Martin as a private rebuke of his behavior and, thereafter, to close the case.

“Judge Martin was mailed this letter, and the case is now closed,” the letter said.

There had been numerous calls for the judge’s removal when the situation developed.

rest: http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/judge-in-zombie-muhammad-case-reprimanded/?cat_orig=us


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on July 30, 2012, 06:35:08 am
The Great Muslim Cover-Up
Posted By Daniel Greenfield On July 26, 2012 @ 12:30 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage | 47 Comments

Over in Toronto, a Muslim cleric with the unwieldy name of Al-Hashim Kamena Atangana had a great idea. Al-Hashim’s idea was for Toronto to pass laws forcing women to wear burkas. “Cover up or get raped,” was the implied message. Toronto only has an estimated 5.5 percent Muslim population so the Toronto Taliban probably won’t be getting their way until they have higher double digit numbers, but they can wait.

Meanwhile in Egypt where the population is 90 percent Muslim and the other 10 percent are running for their lives, a new TV channel represents a brave new frontier in Islamic feminism. Maria TV features women giving lifestyle and makeup tips while wearing full niqab, which covers their faces and leaves only their eyes exposed. According to some Saudi clerics who think that women are only allowed to leave one eye exposed, this makes them either a bold feminist experiment or shameless strumpets.

In a country where Tahrir Square has become synonymous with sexual assault; the Al-Hashim paradigm is taking hold. There are photos of female students at Cairo University from the 60′s and 70′s that showed them dressing like women did in the 60′s and 70′s. But by the time Obama showed up to praise Cairo University as a great representative of Islamic civilization, the cover-up had begun. The question is where will the cover-up end and what will the Cairo University class of 2020 look like? They probably won’t have faces, but will they even have eyes?

You can attend a university with your head covered, even with your face covered, but it gets harder to attend class when your eyes are covered. If the trend means anything in a decade Muslim feminism will mean fighting for the right to keep one eye open in a creed that wants everyone to keep their eyes shut.

The West has reacted to the Islamic cover-up with its own cover-up. The Western liberal will run through the gamut of his own civilization’s sins before reluctantly admitting that some parts of the Muslim world may not be an ideal place to be a woman, but he immediately reaches for a rolled up copy of the New York Times and uses Tom Friedman’s latest report from an airport’s luxury lounge in Dubai or Kuala Lumpur as proof that the reforms are coming.

Indeed if you read anything from Tom Friedman, who is expert at writing books about how the world is becoming a global village because it’s so ridiculously easy for him to fly anywhere on his frequent flyer miles, that is all he can talk about. Saudi Arabia is constantly being reformed. Why in 1962 it abolished slavery and recently the Saudi king has agreed to let women vote in municipal elections in 2015. This is naturally a big deal in an absolute monarchy that has been ruled by the same family for longer than it had oil companies.

There is no question that King Abdullah is a great feminist. If you doubt that just ask any one of his 13 wives. It may be true that women in Saudi Arabia are not allowed to drive or leave the country without permission from their husband; but so long as Tom Friedman has a comfortable seat and an alcohol-free drink whenever he flies to Saudi Arabia, the reports of reforms will keep on coming about this cheerful outpost in our global village.

We all live in villages. Our village is a place where women are considered human beings, but in the village that is an ocean and a desert away, women are considered property. The problem is that lately our two villages have been overlapping thanks to the heap big magic of the airport. Americans travel to Saudi Arabia, where they are told to cover themselves up and respect the local customs, and Muslims travel to Canada where they tell the city of Toronto that it needs to cover up its women or they won’t be responsible for the consequences. Our village just can’t seem to win.

This is not the sort of stuff that you put in tourist brochures, this is the sort of stuff you cover up, and these days our nations exist as long tourist brochures covering up the problems and extolling the virtues of all these people who visit, move in, learn to fly planes and ram them into buildings.

Our tourist brochures say, “Diversity,” but diversity is another one of our village’s unique virtues. It’s not a virtue when you reach Saudi Arabia, and it’s not a virtue when Saudi Arabia reaches us. Our noble commitment to diversity leads us to diversify by investing in multiculturalism, but many of the men with thirteen wives and sharp knives in that other village are not interested in multiculturalism.

The Taliban showed us what they thought of multiculturalism when they blew up Buddhist statues and the Islamists in Mali are showing us what they think of multiculturalism with a rampage directed against Sufi shrines. The Muslim Waqf in Jerusalem is continuing its vandalism of the remains of the Second Temple. All of them are following in the footsteps of Saudi Arabia which has waged a campaign of destruction against the cultural artifacts of every other culture.

In India, Hindus had the temerity to sing in their own country during the month of Ramadan, which ended in violence as furious Muslims tried to explain their views on multiculturalism with big rocks. In that same spirit, Al-Hashim Kamena Atangana, like so many other Muslim clerics, is trying to explain to us that while in our village it may be the custom to treat women as human beings, in his village it is the custom to treat them as property.

The Al-Hashims bellow that Western women should act more Muslim and Western feminist groups encourage their members to try on hijabs as gestures of tolerance and servitude. That great Islamic feminist, King Abdullah and his thirteen wives, whose kingdom spends billions on such propaganda, no doubt approves, and wishes they would move on to not driving cars as another gesture of tolerance for our new wonderfully diverse village.

The hijab is the gateway to the burka and both are just forms of mobile purdah, the segregation that requires a woman to stay at home. And if she can’t stay in her tent, then she can only go out while wearing a big black tent that goes everywhere she goes.

Under the burka, the Muslim woman is still locked up in her room in her husband’s house even when she’s out and about in the marketplace. It is a liberal concession that allows her to occasionally leave the house while still being locked up in the house. And this brilliant bit of Islamic feminism, this reform which says that women can occasionally leave the house and shouldn’t be raped so long as they’re wearing a tent that makes it look like they’re still in purdah, is just one of the ways that Islam is enriching our multiculturalism with its monoculturalism.

Western liberals respond to the problem with the same methods as Middle-Eastern Islamists. Their solution to everything is the great cover-up. Muslims cover up women, Western liberals cover up the Muslim abuse of women. Muslims are afraid of dealing with the idea that women are more than mobile property and Western liberals are terrified of dealing with the idea that this is what Muslims actually believe about women.

Sunlight is the best disinfectant, whether it’s for the bacteria that thrive under full body robes or the kind that thrive in ideologies which try to control everyone. No matter how many cover-ups are made and how many cloaks, hijabs and burkas are thrown over the truth, sooner or later the cover-ups have to end and the truth has to shine forth.

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/daniel-greenfield/the-great-muslim-cover-up/print/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on August 10, 2012, 12:34:26 pm
Obama Administration Paves The Way For Sharia Law

The most terrifying danger Americans face from a second Barack Obama term isn’t the economy, which is scary enough. The most harrowing prospect is the Obama Administration’s passivity in the face of attempts to introduce aspects of sharia law into our legal system. Now there is strong and open evidence of the Obama administration collaborating with Islamist activists to ensure the path toward sharia law is accelerated. Just last week, Thomas Perez, Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division, was asked this question by Trent Franks (R-AZ), a member of the House Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on the Constitution: "Will you tell us here today that this Administration's Department of Justice will never entertain or advance a proposal that criminalizes speech against any religion?" Perez refused to answer. Four times. And why would Franks target Perez? Here’s why...

REST: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/03/Obama-administration-paves-the-way-for-sharia-law


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 10, 2012, 01:14:34 pm
^^

Even our "prominent" evangelicals are quietly promoting Sharia Law as well - no, not just Rick Warren, Bill Hybels, Brian McLaren, and the "religious left", but those on the right as well.

If you guys remember me posting about this last March, my church showed a DVD of Jim Denison, an evangelical in the DFW area(and "influential" across the country as well), exposing the dangers of Islam. It wasn't until the 2nd half of the presentation when he subtlely started promoting heresy. One of them being how when we witness to Muslims, we should use the name Isa(for Jesus), and two, when someone in the audience(in the DVD presentation, that is) asked about Sharia Law, he gave these "But it's not a big deal" response attitude toward it(and even ended up saying a couple of nice things about it). That itself raised a red flag right there that he's working with the NWO.
http://endtimesandcurrentevents.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,5702.0.html

As Christians, no, we shouldn't fear this(for the fear of man bringeth a snare) - however, in particular be careful over these "pastors" and "evangelicals" that are subtlely promoting this as well.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on September 30, 2012, 07:05:13 pm
Cops to answer in court for 'stoning' of Christians

Hundreds of angry Muslims threw chunks of concrete and eggs at a team of Christians, spraying them with urine and cursing at them – all while police stood by and then threatened the victims with “disorderly conduct.”

Egypt? Saudi Arabia? Somalia?

No. Dearborn, Mich.

So now a team of attorneys from the American Freedom Law Center is going to court on behalf of the victims of the violent Muslim mob at the Arab International Festival last June, an attack that was captured on video.

The federal civil rights complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan names as defendants officials from the Wayne County sheriff’s office who “sided with the Muslim mob intent on suppressing the Christians’ speech.”

The complaint explains authorities not only failed to protect the Christians, they ordered them to leave the Arab Festival under threat of arrest for “disorderly conduct.”

However, not one Muslim was arrested for the attack that left several members of the Christian group bloodied, the complaint states.

Among the defendants is Deputy Chief Mike Jaafar, a Muslim who was featured in the now-canceled show “All American Muslim,” which appeared on The Learning Channel.

As WND reported, the crowd can be heard chanting “Allahu Akbar!” – Arabic for “Allah is the greatest!”– on the video.

It shows the crowd – reminiscent of a rock-throwing “intifada” scene from the Middle East – hurling a dizzying barrage of objects at the Christians standing passively with their signs, causing some injuries.

WND later learned that the Christian crowd had been carrying a pole with a pig’s head attached to the top, further angering the Muslim crowd. At the beginning of the video, Christian street preachers shout, “God is good, and God is not Allah!”

First, police approached Ruben Israel of OfficialStreetPreachers.com, warning him: “The city of Dearborn has an ordinance, OK, that you guys can’t use the megaphone. So, if you guys continue to use that, you will get a citation.”

Israel noted that the group was allowed to use the megaphone in 2011. Then he asked the officer, “So, if we don’t use a megaphone, can we throw water bottles at the crowd?”

The officer shook his head.

“So what are you going to do if they throw water bottles at us?” Israel asked.

“If that happens, we will take care of that and address it,” the officer promised.

When Israel said he had captured the mob’s assault on the Christians on video, the officer suggested he “take it through the proper channels, and we’ll try to find them.”

However, at the 2:17 mark of the video, the mob can be heard screaming: “You want to jump ‘em? C’mon, let’s go!”

One boy yells, “Let’s beat the sh-t out of them!”

A girl shouts, “Go home! Do you understand English?!”

The Christians are no longer using megaphones, as the mob advances on them from all angles – hurling bottles, cans, eggs, chunks of concrete and even milk crates toward their heads.

Even young children shout obscenities such as, “F—k you, b-tch!”

Meanwhile, police are nowhere to be seen in the video.

One of the Christians asks another, “Is this worse than last year?”

He replies, “Oh my goodness, yeah!! This is insanity.”

An irate 18-year-old man from Iraq gets into the Christians’ faces, screaming: “If you don’t like Dearborn, then go the f—k back home! … I am an American citizen, and I have my rights. There’s freedom of religion, isn’t there?”

He screams, “So why do you guys pray like this on the bank? Oh Lord. Why don’t you get on the ground, like the prophets, huh? You’re Christian. That’s what it says in the Bible, you stupid sh-t!”

Many minutes into the video and after much of the shouting takes place, Dearborn mounted police ride through the crowd. The video states that no arrests were made.

According to the video, the mob began chucking more stones, bottles and debris as the Christians were injured and property damaged.

“Dearborn Police finally arrive after 30 mins of assault,” a caption states.

Despite the attacks the Christians had endured, a man identified in the video as Deputy Chief Dennis Richardson of the Wayne County Sheriff’s Office tells them, “You’re a danger to the safety right now.”

Officers claim they don’t have the manpower to protect the Christians at the festival.

“Your safety is in harm’s way. You need to protect everybody,” said Deputy Chief Mike Jaafar of the Wayne County Sheriff’s Office. “You do have the option to leave. I just want to make that clear.”

Israel replied, “You have the option to stand with us” as Jaafar walked away, leaving the Christians to the mob.

When police leave, the crowd continues harassing the Christians and screaming profanities.

Then police begin escorting the Christians away from the crowd.

Deputy Chief Richardson tells Israel: “We have the responsibility of policing the entire festival, and obviously your conduct is such that it’s causing a disturbance and is a direct threat to the safety of everyone here. Someone could get hurt. You already have blood on your face. One of the festival people, one of my officers, anybody can get hurt. Now we’re going to escort you out.”

Israel explains that the mob throws things and becomes more aggressive when police leave the scene.

“Part of the reason that they throw things on someone is because you tell them stuff that enrages them,” Richardson argues.

The AFLC said the Christians were wearing shirts with Scripture quotes and Christian messages.

“In our society, which is guided by Judeo-Christian principles, free speech and religious freedom are protected against censorship or punishment,” said Robert Muise, AFLC co-founder and senior counsel.

“Consequently, law enforcement officials have a constitutional duty not to effectuate a heckler’s veto, nor may they join a violent mob intent on suppressing speech. Instead, officials must take reasonable action to protect persons exercising their free speech rights. Here, we have an angry and violent mob of Muslims intent on suppressing free speech and law enforcement officials aiding and abetting the violence in violation of the Constitution.”

Daivd Yerushalmi, co-founder of the AFLC, said: “What is shocking is that this Shariah-mandated violence in response to speech contrary to Islam is not just occurring overseas in places like Egypt and Libya, it is happening right here in the United States. One thing is clear: no citizen should be stoned in a city street in America for exercising his constitutional rights. In the United States, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, not Shariah.”

AFLC attorneys already successfully have litigated several challenges on behalf of Christians whose rights were violated in Dearborn – which is described as “a city with one of the largest Muslim populations in the United States.”

The team said, for example, a Christian pastor was banned from handing out Christian literature in 2009, and the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided the pastor’s First Amendment rights were trampled.

Then the next year, four Christians were handcuffed and jailed by police for preaching during the Arab Festival. They were accused of “breach of the peace.”

A jury acquitted the four, and in a subsequent civil rights complaint, a federal judge rejected city demands to dismiss it.

The current case alleges Wayne County officials violated the Christians’ rights to freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion protected by the First Amendment, and that the officials deprived the Christians of the equal protection of the law guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendment.

(Editor’s note: The following 22-minute video contains profane statements shouted by an angry mob and may be offensive to viewers.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vnJBW49afzg

http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/cops-to-answer-in-court-for-stoning-of-christians/?utm_


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on October 01, 2012, 05:07:53 am
Such bs. Both sides are wrong, especially those fake Christians running around trying to protest evil. It makes no sense at all, nor is it doctrinal, for a person to protest like that against another group. The scriptures tell us that those people will act up, so what. Trying to go to a festival to somehow change unbeliever's evil ways is a waste of time, and actually has the opposite effect. It's like intruding into a meeting of satanists, and asking them to convert. It won't work. We must let the Spirit guide us, not our own vain attempts at making things right.

"The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit." John 3:8 (KJB)

"And now I say unto you, Refrain from these men, and let them alone: for if this counsel or this work be of men, it will come to nought:: Acts 5:38 (KJB)



Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on October 13, 2012, 11:00:09 am
CHALLENGING SHARIA LAW MEANS CHALLENGING ISLAM AS A RELIGION

By: Devvy
October 13, 2012
NewsWithViews.com

There are more efforts underway to stop Sharia Law from becoming in the this country. So far, efforts have failed:

Federal court blocks Oklahoma ban on Sharia - January 10, 2012

(CNN) -- "A federal appeals court has blocked an Oklahoma voter-approved measure barring state judges from considering Islamic and international law in their decisions. The three-judge panel at the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an earlier injunction preventing State Question 755 from being certified until the free speech questions are resolved. The decision Tuesday allows a lawsuit brought by Islamic-American groups to move ahead to a bench trial.

"The proposed amendment discriminates among religions," said the judges. "The Oklahoma amendment specifically names the target of its discrimination. The only religious law mentioned in the amendment is Sharia law...."In bringing suit, CAIR argued that the amendment violates the establishment and free-exercise clauses of the First Amendment's guarantee of religious freedom. The group's local leader, Muneer Awad, has said the amendment passed in November 2010 under a campaign of fear and misinformation about Islam."

Let's start with the definition of Sharia Law:

"Sharia is the moral code and religious law of Islam. Sharia deals with many topics addressed by secular law, including crime, politics, and economics, as well as personal matters such as sexual intercourse, hygiene, diet, prayer, and fasting. Though interpretations of sharia vary between cultures, in its strictest definition it is considered the infallible law of God—as opposed to the human interpretation of the laws (fiqh).

"There are two primary sources of sharia law: the precepts set forth in the Quran, and the example set by the Islamic prophet Muhammad in the Sunnah. Where it has official status, sharia is interpreted by Islamic judges (qadis) with varying responsibilities for the religious leaders (imams). For questions not directly addressed in the primary sources, the application of sharia is extended through consensus of the religious scholars (ulama) thought to embody the consensus of the Muslim Community (ijma). Islamic jurisprudence will also sometimes incorporate analogies from the Quran and Sunnah through qiyas, though Shia jurists prefer reasoning ('aql) to analogy."

In order for courts to declare Sharia Law is protected under the First Amendment, shouldn't there be a rational discussion as to whether or not Islam is even a bona fide religion? I say, yes. When I brought up this argument several years ago, I can't even begin to describe the vicious emails filled with very personal and in your face death threats. However, that has not deterred me because Islam is a national security threat, not a religion.

Just because Islam has been called a religion for a few thousand years, doesn't make it so. Discussing religion has caused stupid people who lose their tempter to have violent arguments. In the case of Islam, it means death and destruction (remember the riots in France and England over some stupid cartoon?) for anyone who criticizes their **** prophet Muhammad: "Pedophilia is permitted in the Qur'an, was practiced by Muhammad and his companions, and some Muslims today continue to commit the crime, following their prophet's example."

They're still pedophiles: The terrifying world of child brides: Devastating images show girls young enough to be in pre-school who are married off to older men. "At age 11, Ghulam was married off to 40-year-old Jaiz in a rural Afghan village, making her only one of more than 10 million young girls who are being forced to wed men old enough to be their fathers or grandfather every year." Yemen's majority population are Sunni Muslims and Afghanistan is dominated by Muslims of different sects.

In America, people are free to worship the religion of their choice whether I agree with them or not. That is why we call it freedom of religion. Islam, however, is a completely different belief system. Islam is all about killing, violence and has enslaved more than a billion human beings. If you do not believe some guy called Allah is the only God you must worship, you are an infidel punishable by death. What kind of religion is that? What kind of religion calls for decapitating someone who criticizes Islam? What kind of religion trains children to become soldiers?

Let me quote a few others who also don't believe Islam is a religion; I hope you take the time to read their columns:

Demoting Islam's Religion Status: "One thing is certain, Islam is not a religion by anything Americans believe one to be - not even close. In fact, Islam is the antithesis of what we deem to be religious. Above all, Islam is a totalitarian political machine of blood thirsty conquest which zealously advocates the downfall of the U.S. government."

An Impostor Religion

"To put it bluntly Islam’s religion status should be rescinded because it is a wolf in sheep's clothing, a Trojan horse, an impostor religion that has arrived on our shore with malicious intent, deathly determined to replace our constitution with the Koran, and turn America into an Islamic nation controlled by Sharia law. Robert Spencer in his excellent book, "Stealth Jihad” (How Radical Islam Is Subverting America Without Guns or Bombs), explains how so-called moderate Islam is having greater success at invading America than its counterpart militant Islam. Shockingly, one may rightly conclude that America is now being conquered without Islam even having to fire a shot. Have we really become that docile, self complacent and pathetic? The answer is Yes!

The Sham of Moderate Islam

"Does this mean that even so-called moderate Muslims are hostile to America? It certainly does. Moderate Muslims support the conquest of America with fervor equal to that of the militant Muslims. They cunningly play the role of the "good cop” in their good cop, bad cop charade deceiving we gullible Americans. In fact, the "two hands” of Islam aspire to choke the life out of America. One hand is called militant Muslims; the other hand is called moderate Muslims. These "two hands” work together, in their Koranically mandated asphyxiation pogrom, of strangling America into submission. This point cannot be overemphasized."

What Is Islam? "Islam is not a religion, but a harmful thorn; thus, we must make laws to fight this unwanted thorn growing like mushrooms in our backyards. If Islam is not controlled, these mushrooms soon will blossom and become mushroom-clouds."

Sharia law makes Islam much more than a religion. Its broad doctrine and application to non-Muslims make Islam a political entity, a government with goals of global dominion.

Islam and Shariah Banking. "Whoever says Islam is a religion is totally blind to the obvious or is a sympathizer. Islam is a complete authoritarian government-political-business-control enterprise whose only object is total subjugation of mankind and the destruction of western civilization. They invade the host country as a virus by exploiting the host's freedom of speech and religion with political correctness, and eventually demand Shariah law and Shariah banking. As we appease Muslims and accede to their demands we will see the decline of western civilization."

How foolish is it to invite the enemy into our country and then genuflect at their feet while they hide their real agenda behind our First Amendment?

Mosques and the Islamization of America. "Disguised as religion, Islam has penetrated democracies with the aim of replacing civility and liberty with the barbarism of 7th century Islamic theocracy and Sharia law. Islam's multi-pronged attack aims to destroy all that liberty offers."

And, speaking of mosques, this little booklet is in almost all mosques in the U.S.: Jihad in Islam. Do check page 5 of the 37 page booklet: "But the truth is that Islam is not the name of a ‘Religion’, nor is ‘Muslim’ the title of a ‘Nation’. In reality Islam is a revolutionary ideology and programme which seeks to alter the social order of the whole world and rebuild it in conformity with its own tenets and ideals. ‘Muslim’ is the title of that International Revolutionary Party organized by Islam to carry into effect its revolutionary programme. And ‘Jihad’ refers to that revolutionary struggle and utmost exertion which the Islamic Party brings into play to achieve this objective."

If you read the whole thing, you'll get a clear understanding of the goals of Islam. It is a party hell bent on forcing every human on this earth to "worship" their putrid ideology.

Is Islam a Religion or Military Ideology? "The question our political czars and Emir (Leader/Prince) Obama should ponder is this: If Islamic scholars state Islam is more of a political, economic, and military ideology above even religion, then should our government not agree and cancel all of their non profit tax status? Should we not remove the thousands of religious visa given to Muslim leaders? Should we not be taking the words Jihad and Islamic terrorism seriously?"

General: Muslim Brotherhood plots undoing of America - Boykin makes impassioned plea for expose` of stealth jihad
Muslim Brotherhood: "Yes, We Will Be Masters of the World"

Islam is a religion of peace is one of the greatest whoppers ever told.

UK Muslim Leader: Islam Not a Religion of Peace

"You can't say that Islam is a religion of peace," Choudary told CBN News. "Because Islam does not mean peace. Islam means submission. So the Muslim is one who submits. There is a place for violence in Islam. There is a place for jihad in Islam." Choudary is the leader of Islam4UK, a group recently banned in Britain under the country's counter-terrorism laws. He wants Islamic Sharia law to rule the United Kingdom and is working to make that dream a reality. While Islamic radicals in the United States usually prefer to speak in more moderate tones while in public, masking their true agenda, Choudary has no such inhibitions. He has praised the 9/11 hijackers and has called for the execution of Pope Benedict."

Muslim Children's Comic Book publishes detailed step-by-step instruction of how to make a Molotov cocktail
Outraged Muslim shoots 14-yr old girl in head for wanting an education
Islam's Burning Love. COX'S BAZAR, Bangladesh (Reuters)—"Hundreds of Muslims in Bangladesh burned at least four Buddhist temples and 15 homes of Buddhists on Sunday after complaining that a Buddhist man had insulted Islam, police and residents said."
Muslim Dad 'tied daughter to tree and hacked her to death with an axe because he was ashamed she worked in a beauty salon'
Enter the Gates of Hell. Warning: The photos are real, they are graphic and anyone who says Islam is a "religion of peace" is a damn fool.
Egyptian Cleric Abd Al-Rahman Mansour Gives Guidelines For Wife Beating In Islam - Last year, the thieves in Congress stole the fruits of your labor to give $1.5 BILLION BORROWED to Egypt in unconstitutional foreign aid. Actually, that is the average every year stolen from we the people.
Egyptian Father Kills Three Daughters with Snake for being girls (Yes, they are heathens)
Muslims (The Religion of Peace) Burn Fifty (50) Christians Alive

Muslim **** Gangs Have Been A Problem In Europe For Years
UK Muslim Gang **** 100 Teenage Girls

Now those savage animals have come to America:

Police: "One of The Most Horrific Sexual Assaults I Ever Saw" in Colorado Iraqi Gang **** Case

Allowing Muslims to serve in our military is beyond foolish. Mass murderer, Nidal Malik Hassan, still hasn't been tried and executed for slaughtering 13 Americans at Ft. Hood on Nov. 5, 2009. There is no doubt of his guilt. The trial continues to be delayed because Hassan is fighting shaving his beard for court based on religious grounds. Almost three years the families and survivors of that massacre have been waiting for justice. Muslims have become experts at gaming our judicial system.

Pentagon Indoctrinating U.S. Soldiers With Islamic Propaganda. "... the U.S. Army has published a special handbook for soldiers that appears to justify Islamic jihad by describing it as the “communal military defense of Islam and Muslims when they are threatened or under attack.”

How about Muslims continuing to kill our soldiers in the never ending unconstitutional invasions of countries in the Middle East?

Afghan soldier turns his gun on American troops, killing two in shooting
Worst Loss For Marine Squadron VMA-211 Since Wake Island

"The U.S. Marine Corps has suffered its worst air squadron catastrophe since Vietnam. The VMA-211 squadron has taken its worst hit since the defense of Wake Island in World War II. On Friday, September 14, at around 10:15 p.m. local time, a force of Taliban gunmen attacked Camp Bastion, in Helmand Province — the main strategic base in southwestern Afghanistan.

"Fewer than two dozen insurgents wearing U.S. Army uniforms, divided into three teams, breached the perimeter fence and assaulted the airfield. That includes the U.S. Camp Leatherneck and the U.K.’s Camp Bastion where Prince Harry, an AH-64 Apache pilot is stationed. The Taliban reportedly are anxious to get Prince Harry, who would prefer to be treated just like anyone else.

"The attack killed VMA-211 squadron commander Lt. Col. Christopher Raible and destroyed or permanently disabled eight of the ten top-of-the-line Harrier AV-8B attack aircraft in his squadron. The Harrier has been out of production for more than a decade, and the aircraft can never be replaced."

'I waited until they took off their body armor off... and then I shot them dead:' Chilling account of 'green on blue' attack by Afghan who killed two U.S. soldiers

3 US troops gunned down by Afghan soldier they were training

For what, I ask you?

For every one of the examples above, I can give you a thousand more. As I have so many times, I highly recommend you read a short book by Dr. Peter Hammond. I had the pleasure of having dinner with him and my dear friend, Brig. Gen. Ben Partin (Ret.) in Alexandria, VA., many years ago. Dr. Hammond is an expert on Islam. If you read Slavery, Terrorism & Islam you will see the history of Islam: Killing men, women and children to further their quest for world domination. Slavery of human beings didn't bother them a bit over the centuries.

That is the cancer unleashed upon America by allowing Muslims into this country. So, I ask you again: Is Islam a religion? How could anyone who hasn't had their brain polluted with political correctness believe Islam is a religion, never mind a "peaceful" one?

Stopping Sharia Law must be a priority in this country in our state legislatures:

Minnesota Under Attack From Sharia Law - Short video everyone should watch

American Muslims Stone Christians in Dearborn, MI - Video that will make you puke. Make sure your state rep and senator get that link. Tell him/her this will spread across this country if we don't stop it. When Muslims become enough in numbers, countries are ruined.

In the blink of an eye, this type of violence will come to your city or town and Muslims will claim protection of religion under the First Amendment. Mark my words: The Trojan Horse shoved down our throats is named violence and hatred. Violence is never the answer no matter how much you disagree with someone. For Muslims, it is a way of life.

Someone emailed suggesting all Muslims be deported. That is not only impossible, but not legally nor morally right. I don't know the exact number, but millions of Muslims born in this country to two parents who are U.S. citizens are Americans by birth. Immigrant Muslims who have become U.S. citizens must take the oath:

"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."

There are exceptions to some of the language like service in the Armed Forces and "8 C.F.R. 337.1 provides that the phrase "so help me God" is optional and that the words ‘on oath’ can be substituted with ‘and solemnly affirm’. Also, if the prospective citizen can prove such commitments are in violation with his or her religion." That's how Muslims think they can get away with demanding Sharia Law - they don't take the oath of citizenship to become an American. They take it to use the First Amendment as a shield to protect the ultimate goal of Islam. They cannot have taken the oath honestly to "support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America" since the goal is to establish Sharia Law over the U.S. Consitution and state constitutions.

I feel very sorry for men, women and children who have bought into the propaganda about Islam as a religion instead of understanding it is nothing more than a brutal totalitarian form of government denying them even the most basic of human rights. However, Muslims in this country should be made to understand in no uncertain terms that this is America. The supreme law of our land is the U.S. Constitution and it will never be Sharia Law. If you break our laws, you go to prison, not to some mosque where you can further plan the destruction of America.

Sharia in America

"Omar M. Ahmad founder of CAIR said: 'Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant' he said. 'The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America , and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth,' he said."

"Since slavery will be allowed government can open slave markets to sell it's 20% share of the captured women. Captured women/slave-girls can provide affordable domestic help for house wives and clean enjoyable sex for their husbands."

"Since men will be allowed four wives and unlimited number of slave girls, population boom will result in making the fastest growing religion grow even faster. All non muslims will live under dhimmi rules and pay heavy Jizya. Budget deficits will be a thing of the past.

"Stoning of adulterers, whipping of alcohol drinkers, cutting of hands and feet of thieves and beheadings of apostates can be carried out after Juma prayers on Fridays in the local stadium. Gate charge for this gory and exciting weekly spectacle can generate a lot of revenue".

"Marriage age for girls can be lowered to 6 years. That will reduce the burden of support of large poorer families and also promote a sunna, the tradition set by the holy prophet (peace be up on him)."

This eight minute video will be an eye opener and should be watched. People must understand what Sharia Law means; it's ugly:

Islam : Most important video I have ever seen on Islam.

Now, do you want Sharia Law allowed in this country and protected under the First Amendment? It is a toxic poison that must be stopped before we're all forced to drink it.

States can continue to pass legislation and get it signed into law, or like Oklahoma, put it to the voters. However, unless and until the real question of whether or not Islam is a religion is settled, the will of the people will continue to be overthrown by federal judges.

That very important question is the one state legislatures should be addressing. If you play by the enemie's rules, you'll lose every time. Muslims are hiding behind the First Amendment. I say we pull back the curtain and take away that protection because Islam is not a religion even under the most liberal definitions. Of course, it takes courage to take a stand and question the legitimacy of Islam as a religion. Only massive pressure from we the people will make it happen.

massive links in article: http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd555.htm


Title: Muslim Mafia In US Operates With Impunity
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 19, 2012, 03:44:58 pm
http://rense.com/general95/musmaf.html

Muslim Mafia In US Operates With Impunity

By Frosty Wooldridge
10-4-12
 
Part 13:  Slow, methodical, disciplined, meticulous injection of Islam into America

Journalist Ricardo Duchesne said, “The problem is Mass Immigration into European/Western lands. Islam is a political religion and, as such, it will never assimilate to a modern Western society.  So, Muslim immigration exacerbates this problem, but we should avoid framing this question as a confrontation between Western modernity and traditional Islam, Good vs. Evil. Muslims should decide for themselves how they would like to organize their own societies; we Westerners just don't need masses of them in our homelands. France and England are close to a point of no return with millions of Muslims now well entrenched there dictating political outcomes. Mass African/Asian immigration into European countries is also a problem. Europeans will eventually become a marginalized minority in their own homelands.  Europeans are a rapidly being reduced to a single digit minority in the world.”

Islam contributed not one iota to the U.S. Constitution.  In fact, if our founding fathers followed Islam, this nation would be ruled by theocratic Sharia Law. Women would enjoy less status than their husbands’ dogs. Everyone would be mandated to bow to Mecca five times a day.  Islam does not allow freedom of religion, freedom of thought or women’s rights.  It demands total submission to all within its power.  It rules by fear and violence.

Most Americans do not hold a clue as to Islam’s systematic incursion into the United States.  In 1990, a total of 100,000 Muslims made less than a ripple within America.   But, because of the late Senator Teddy Kennedy’s corruption of immigration and aided by our U.S. Congress, today, Muslims number from seven to eight million.

They enclave as they push regular Americans out of cities and towns across America.  Detroit, Michigan suffers 400,000 Middle Eastern immigrants.  Notice it also suffers 50 percent illiteracy and a 76 percent dropout rate from their high schools.   They find themselves better served by sticking together with their religion, language and customs.  They work against every aspect of  “assimilating” into America.

For simple examples of their “separating” themselves from host countries, you may look at France, United Kingdom, Holland, Belgium, Sweden, Austria, Germany, Norway and other countries overtaken by Muslims.  They literally create an antagonistic culture within the host country.

As of December, 2012, they boast of  2,050 mosques in America; most built with Saudi Arabia oil money.  As their custom dictates, women must remain in a lowered status and enter those mosques at back doors.

In an expose’ of Islam’s final intentions as to the United States, IPT News published the following account: “Radical Movement's Leader Forecasts
America's Demise” on December 4, 2009. You may access it at this website:

http://www.investigativeproject.org/1553/radical-movements-leader-forecasts-americas-demise

“As the spotlight moves away from the Fort Hood massacre, one of America's most openly radical Islamist organizations has taken to the murderer's defense,” IPT reported.  “As-Sabiqun, a Washington D.C.-based organization with branches in four other major American cities, released a flyer labeling shooter Nidal Malik Hasan as "victimized" and the "target of psychological warfare." The handout also defended convicted terrorists and suspects.

“As-Sabiqun has repeatedly predicted the demise of the United States and dreams of "the Islamic State of North America no later than 2050." It has openly declared support for terrorist organizations like Hamas and Hizbullah, and even claimed it funded anti-American militants. With concerns growing over radical Islamist propaganda in the United States, As-Sabiqun is one of the leading organizations building a bridge between international Islamism and its developing American counterpart.”

Steve S. responded to the report: “So what's new?  As-Sabiqun is perfectly within his legislated rights to call for the violent overthrow of our freedoms and values, and I expect anytime soon to be reminded by leftist inbreds that not all Muslims are terrorists and that Islam is a peaceful religion...oh, and that I must be a bigot for thinking otherwise.  Let's face it; there is little hope for the fat and complacent West as long as our gutless leaders yawn at the reality that the progress of Man is under siege by an insidious religious ideology that will stop at nothing short of unconditional domination.  Much of Scandinavia is already on the path to capitulation, while the rest of Europe continues to huddle around the consolation that it holds the moral high ground.”

A Muslim named “Musa” has traveled abroad to support Islamist movements worldwide. The As-Sabiqun website indicates that Musa traveled abroad several times to Iran. During a 1996 conference in South Africa, he stated:

"And this religion Islam will dominate all other religions whether the Americans, whether the British, whether the French, whether the Russians, whether the Japanese, whether all of them get together in one solid group to fight Islam. It don't make no difference. In the final analysis, Allah said that his religion—Islam—will rise to the forefront, will be elevated to the role of leadership in this world, whether they all like it or not."

“The extremism expressed by As-Sabiqun and Musa might easily be passed off as the bizarre ranting of a radical cleric and his hateful organization,” reported IPT News. “However, as the Fort Hood massacre, the FBI shooting of Luqman Abdullah in Detroit, Michigan, and other recent investigations show, fiery rhetoric can lead to violent plotting. The lesson of Fort Hood is not to ignore open self-radicalization, but to heed those who openly preach our destruction from within.”

If you think it’s easy to placate Islam, think again.  It uses “political correctness” like an art form.  The Council on American Islamic Relations uses it with incredible finesse.  However, the FBI and other federal organizations currently run investigations on C.A.I.R. for funneling money to terrorists.

Catching up to Islam, P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry wrote a blockbuster book, Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America.

Gaubatz and Sperry conducted a six-month penetration of the Council on American-Islamic Relations that resulted in the collection of thousands of pages of revealing documents as well as inside secrets.

“The book’s frightening allegations are well supported by more than twelve thousand pages of confidential, internal CAIR documents secretly extracted during an unprecedented undercover operation.  This trail of information reveals the insidious and well-funded efforts of the seditious Muslim Brotherhood under the nonprofit guise of CAIR to fully support the international jihad against the United States, with the goal of transforming American society from within. They hope to accomplish this through terrorist activities, fraud, and infiltration of our political and intelligence systems, which these documents clearly reveal.”

What you'll learn in this book:

Which politicians are given money by CAIR.

How Capitol Hill staffers are strategically placed by CAIR.

Why FBI bonuses are paid to agents who are nice to CAIR.

Why our government is afraid to reveal what they really know about CAIR.

Again, the United States remains the last “mark” for Islam.  It’s going to be very interesting to see how fast it converges onto America and how fast it uses the U.S. Constitution to institute Sharia Law within the United States, city by city, state by state and ultimately, all of America.

 


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 20, 2012, 04:05:50 pm
http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2012/10/16/obama-family-raising-money-for-sharia-in-kenya/

Obama family raising money for sharia in Kenya

10/16/12

This would make for some great presidential townhall debate questions, except the media is in full protection mode. via Obama family busted in Shariah scheme.
 
Since his inauguration, President Obama’s family in Kenya has been on a mission to use the Obama name to transform Kenya from the nation’s current Christian majority to an Islamic majority that will spread Islamic law, or Shariah, through the country.

Arab researchers Walid and Theodore Shoebat have documented the claims in a special report that translates an explosive television interview never before seen in the West.
 
In the interview, Musa Ismail Obama, President Obama’s first cousin in Kenya, told the Arabic-language satellite TV network Al-Jazeera that the Saudi Arabian royal family has developed a strong relationship with the Obama family in their home village of Kogelo in Alego, Siaya District, West Kenya.
 
Musa took pains to explain the need to proselytize Islam in Kenya, which is in line with the desire of wealthy Saudis to transform Kenya into a majority Muslim country.
 
Walid Shoebat pointed out that an article in the Arabic-language newspaper Al-Arab acknowledged the importance of the Obama name to the efforts of the Kenya family to expand the position of Islam in the country. Shoebat noted the article describes President Obama as a Muslim, referring to “President Obama’s Islamic faith.”
 
See the interview in three parts:
 
Part II here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiOFB5xtb-Q&feature=player_embedded#t=0s

The Obamas fundraising empire is so successful the excess students have had to be diverted from Saudi Arabia to nearby Doha in Qatar.
 
“When [the students] submit an application to Sarah Obama Benevolent Fund, they expect to get what they want, but we are flooded,” Musa explained in the Al Jazeera interview.
 
Learning of the flood of students sent to the Wahhabi universities in Saudi Arabia, the Al-Jazeera interviewer asked, “So you are opening an avenue in other universities?”
 
Musa said the excess students were sent to nearby Doha, after Musa visited and made the necessary arrangements.
 
Following up, the Al-Jazeera interviewer asked Musa, “Do all these scholarships involve studying Arabic and Shariah?”
 
Musa explained, “Some of those do not involve Shariah, like medicine or engineering.”
 
Al-Jazeera then asked what the majority of students were sent to Qatar to study.
 
“The majority of course is Shariah schools,” Musa explained, “because my connections in the institutions [in Qatar] is with Shariah schools”


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 24, 2012, 08:45:07 am
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-20050713?print=true

23 October 2012 Last updated at 14:14 ET
Mali crisis: 'Foreign fighters come to help Islamists'

Foreign fighters have arrived in a town in northern Mali, Gao's exiled mayor has told the BBC, confirming reports of an influx of jihadists to the north.

Sadou Diallo said between 60 and 100 Algerians and Sahrawis had come into the town about four or five days ago.

A resident in Timbuktu told the AFP news agency on Monday that Sudanese Islamists had arrived over the weekend.

Plans are under way for military intervention after Islamists took over northern Mali earlier this year.

Continue reading the main story “Start QuoteIf we don't act there is a very real threat of further attacks in Africa, and eventually Europe, the Middle East and beyond”
End Quote Stephen O'Brien UK envoy
Two weeks ago, the UN Security Council gave the regional bloc Ecowas 45 days to draw up a plan with the details of its offer to send 3,000 troops to the vast desert region.

The Islamist groups and Tuareg rebels took control of northern Mali following a coup in March.

The junta seized power, accusing the government of failing to deal effectively with a Tuareg rebellion that had started in January - but Islamist groups then took advantage of the chaos and seized all the region's major towns, including the historic city of Timbuktu.

The Islamists, who have since fallen out with their Tuareg allies, have imposed a harsh interpretation of Sharia in the areas they control - there are reports of people being stoned to death and having their limbs amputated.

'Koranic students recruited'
 
Mr Diallo told the BBC's Focus on Africa programme the foreign fighters were lightly armed and had arrived in Gao on 93 trucks.

"They were identified as coming mainly from Western Sahara and Algeria. They seem to be instructors. They bring small arms with them, not heavy weapons," he said, adding that one or two of the fighters were from Sudan.

 
"They don't live in the town, they come in during the day, they don't harm the population, they just go about their business and leave at night."

Mr Diallo, Gao's elected mayor who was speaking from the capital, Bamako, said that the Islamist group controlling the town - the Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (Mujao) - had also recruited 200 students from local Koranic schools.

"There is a radical Muslim sect in surrounding villages and all young people from the Koranic schools in the area have joined Mujao... not because they support the group, but because they've lost hope after seven months of suffering, they're unemployed; they can't resist," he added.

He said Mujao paid them between $300 (about £190) and $400 a month.

Earlier a security official told AFP news agency that hundreds of Sudanese and Sahrawi fighters had arrived in the region.

An resident in Timbuktu told the agency on Monday that "more than 150 Sudanese Islamists arrived in 48 hours".

"They are armed and explained that they had come to help their Muslim brothers against the infidels," the agency quoted him as saying.

Timbuktu is where centuries-old shrines to Islamic saints, revered by Sufi Muslims, have also been destroyed by the Islamists, who consider them idolatrous.

Meanwhile, the UK says it could help to provide training for the West African military intervention.

Stephen O'Brien, the UK special envoy to the region, said after his return from discussions in Mali with the government and its international partners that if the crisis in the north was left unresolved the region could provide a new base for terror networks.

"Al-Qaeda in the [Islamic] Maghreb, which has activities in the area, is growing in both capability and ambition, and if we don't act there is a very real threat of further attacks in Africa, and eventually Europe, the Middle East and beyond," AP news agency quotes him as saying.

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle has pledged similar support and voiced similar concerns.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on February 08, 2013, 04:17:58 am
America’s Future Belongs to Islam

Islam, according to newly released data from the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies, is now the fastest growing religion in America, verifying President Barack Obama's claim that the United States is "no longer a Judeo-Christian country."

How many Muslims now live within the country remains anyone's guess, since the U.S. Census Bureau neglects to collect data on religious identification. A 2008 study by Cornell University projected that the number of Muslims in America had climbed from 1.6 million in 1995 to 7 million.[i ] A U.S. News and World Report survey, which was conducted at the same time, placed the figure at 5 million,[ii] while the Pew Research Center set the number at 2.35 million.

But Pew researchers admit that their survey was not thorough since it neglected to take into account immigrant and poor black Muslims.[iii] What's more, these researchers only contacted Americans with telephone landlines and failed to take into account the fact that nearly 50% of U.S. residents and age 18-35 and the nearly 100% of the illegal immigrants who communicate exclusively by cell phones.[iv]

Muslim organizations, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), supported the Cornell University projection of 7 million - - based on mosque attendance.[v]

In any case, all demographers agree that throughout the coming decades, the faith of the Prophet Mohammed will continue to impact and transform all aspects of American life: social, political, and economic.  They further maintain that, save for a cataclysmic sea-change in population trends, Islam by 2050 will emerge as the nation's dominant religion.

Read more: Family Security Matters http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/americas-future-belongs-to-islam?f=must_reads#ixzz2KIkuyzsX




Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 08, 2013, 12:05:23 pm
America’s Future Belongs to Islam

Islam, according to newly released data from the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies, is now the fastest growing religion in America, verifying President Barack Obama's claim that the United States is "no longer a Judeo-Christian country."

How many Muslims now live within the country remains anyone's guess, since the U.S. Census Bureau neglects to collect data on religious identification. A 2008 study by Cornell University projected that the number of Muslims in America had climbed from 1.6 million in 1995 to 7 million.[i ] A U.S. News and World Report survey, which was conducted at the same time, placed the figure at 5 million,[ii] while the Pew Research Center set the number at 2.35 million.

But Pew researchers admit that their survey was not thorough since it neglected to take into account immigrant and poor black Muslims.[iii] What's more, these researchers only contacted Americans with telephone landlines and failed to take into account the fact that nearly 50% of U.S. residents and age 18-35 and the nearly 100% of the illegal immigrants who communicate exclusively by cell phones.[iv]

Muslim organizations, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), supported the Cornell University projection of 7 million - - based on mosque attendance.[v]

In any case, all demographers agree that throughout the coming decades, the faith of the Prophet Mohammed will continue to impact and transform all aspects of American life: social, political, and economic.  They further maintain that, save for a cataclysmic sea-change in population trends, Islam by 2050 will emerge as the nation's dominant religion.

Read more: Family Security Matters http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/americas-future-belongs-to-islam?f=must_reads#ixzz2KIkuyzsX




So it's all the "Zionists" fault, right? ::)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on February 08, 2013, 01:43:20 pm
Quote
the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)

That's definitely an organization that shouldn't be trusted. They are right up there with SPLC and the ADL. Pew either for that matter.

Quote
But Pew researchers admit that their survey was not thorough...

At least they admit their poll is skewed.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 18, 2013, 05:39:43 pm
http://donboys.cstnews.com/muslim-scholar-rapes-burns-crushes-and-kills-his-five-year-old-daughter-for-fear-she-lost-her-virginity
Muslim Scholar Rapes, Burns, Crushes and Kills His Five-Year-Old Daughter for Fear She Lost Her Virginity!

2/6/13

I’ve had it up to here. Enough is enough. It is time to recognize that traditional Islam is backward, bloody, brutal and beastlike. Moreover, I am weary of people who can’t get indignant over the “honor” killings, genital mutilation of little girls, and the creeping of sharia law in America. It is not wise to generalize, but generally speaking, Muslims who follow the Koran as a holy book are dangerous, deceived, and deadly people. And it’s time for our government to act.
 
U.S. Muslims are waiting until they have the influence to strike and they will strike. Only uneducated fools say otherwise. Islamic leaders have already demanded sharia law in the U.S., Canada, and Britain. Sharia is not only a judicial system; it is a barbaric way of life that every Muslim must follow. Muslim ferociousness has been common for more than 1400 years in other nations. A few years ago there were a few Muslim political leaders that were at least somewhat reasonable, but not today. Even Turkey is slipping swiftly into the radical Islamist orbit where Muslim fanatics rule. Must I remind my readers of the dominoes falling all over the Middle East as I write?
 
Do you remember the fall of the Shah of Iran? The Shah was hated by the leftists in America and Europe. Well, we got rid of our friend in 1979 and he was replaced by radicals who seized 52 Americans and terrorized them for 444 days until the day Ronald Reagan was inaugurated. You think maybe the weak-minded Muslim leaders connected the dots? Under weak, whining, and whimpering U.S. leaders, we have seen Bahrain, Algeria, Tunisia, Yemen, Libya, and Egypt fall into the abyss of Islamists and as I write, Syria is being bombed back to the Stone Age and will be ruled by fanatics. North Mali has fallen to Islamists and French troops are trying to keep them from taking control of the south. Within a year, Iraq and Afghanistan will each be an Islamist extremist paradise–again, although stained with American blood.
 
I will not take the space to prove the Koran clearly teaches hate against Christians and Jews and even commands killing of such people. Yes, I know that there are many Muslims who profess not to believe that, but then, they are not dedicated Muslims, or they are lying. Muslims are permitted to lie if it advances the cause of Islam.
 
This week a news report revealed that Fayhan al-Ghamdi, a famous Muslim cleric who often appears on Saudi Arabia television, has admitted to torturing, raping, and killing his five-year-old daughter because he was fearful she had lost her virginity! What a nation and what a religion! This is the nation that views women drivers as being “unchaste” while they promote, permit, and practice all kinds of wickedness under the color of a “peaceful religion.” Some fools have said that this has nothing to do with Islam when it has everything to do with Islam.
 
The child-rapist-killer cleric is a highly respected Islamic scholar but I think he is not a scholar but a scumbag. The barbarian not only raped his daughter but “raped [her] everywhere” according to a social worker at the hospital. The girl died from injuries relating to a crushed skull, broken ribs, a broken arm, a broken back and severe burns. In addition to being brutally beaten with a cane and cables, medical reports say that the child had also been raped repeatedly.
 
The killer was arrested (after all there are some limitations even for barbarians), tried and found guilty and served three months in prison and paid a $50,000 fine that was blood money for the mother’s family. Had the victim been a male, his fine would have been $100,000! Yes, it is Saudi’s business how they handle their sharia “justice” system run by imams, but it is a dirty business that no civilized nation should have anything to do with. In the “enlightened” kingdom of Saudi Arabia, a Muslim cannot be executed for murdering his wife or children! That nation is our friend! I’m not interested in having such friends. They will probably be the next “friend” of the U.S. to fall to the most extreme Muslims, but how could it be more extreme than this revolting crime?
 
Meanwhile, I can think and wish about having the opportunity and privilege of getting justice for the innocent girl. I would be honored to show her rapist-killer-father some biblical justice.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on February 20, 2013, 03:35:59 am
Muslim accused of beheading 2 Christians in U.S.
Torture, persecution of faithful no longer reserved for Islamic nations


VID: http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/muslim-accused-of-beheading-2-christians-in-u-s/

Authorities in New Jersey allege a Muslim man beheaded two Coptic Christians, burying their bodies and heads and hands in separate graves near Philadelphia, bringing the horror of the persecution of Christians in Islamic nations to the United States.

According to New York’s WABC-TV, the Muslim was identified as Yusuf Ibrahim, 28. He was taken into custody after the bodies were found.

The report said investigators alleged Ibrahim killed the victims then severed their heads and hands, and buried the remains in the back yard of a home in Buena Vista, N.J.

The report said the victims were from the Coptic Christian community in the area. One of the victims had come from Egypt not many years ago.

While the report said police did not indicate a motive, friends of the victims wondered if it was something to do with religion.

WABC reporter Jeff Pegues wrote: “To members of the close knit Coptic Orthodox church the pain is real.”

“It’s a shock, something like this doesn’t happen to people like that,” one resident told him.

The report said police described the suspect as “ruthless” and “calculating” and said he belongs behind bars.

Pamela Geller, who blogs about Islam at Atlas Shrugs, said it “appear have been a ritual killing, religious in nature.”

“The victims were Coptic Christians and the murderer was Muslim (and we are painfully aware of the status and treatment of Coptic Christians under Muslim rule in Egypt),” she wrote.

“The killing evokes this passage in the Quran: ‘When thy Lord was revealing to the angels, ‘I am with you; so confirm the believers. I shall cast into the unbelievers’ hearts terror; so smite above the necks, and smite every finger of them!” – Quran 8:12.”

Samy Hohareb, a friend of the victims, said, “I leave it for the police and the investigation.”

The New York Daily News reported Ibrahim was nabbed by detectives on Sunday after the bodies were found.

Authorities said the suspect was found driving a white Mercedes Benz that belonged to one of the victims.

Ibrahim was being held at the Atlantic County jail on charges of murder and desecration of human remains.

WND reported in September a jihadi writer who has praised the murderer of a Dutch filmmaker suggested beheading as a way of curbing criticism of Islam. The report came from the

Muhib Ru’yat al-Rahman, a senior writer of a leading jihadi forum called Shumoukh al-Islam, suggested that Muslims living in Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and the U.S. kill Westerners who criticize Islam and display their decapitated heads along roads, according to the Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor, a unit of the Middle East Media Research Center.

“While expressing respect for those calling to boycott European and American products over the release of the film ‘Innocence of Muslims,’ which negatively depicts Muhammad, Muhib insists that the best way to deter people from insulting Muhammad and his wives is to implement his proposal,” the  report said.

The writer praised Dutch-Moroccan Muslim Muhammad Bouyeri, who killed Dutch film-maker Theo Van Gogh in 2004 over the production of “Submission,” a film criticizing Islam’s treatment of women. Dozens of forum members praised the post, expressing their agreement with the writer’s suggestions, the report said.

Geller summarized the report: “More tolerance and respect from savages demanding tolerance, respect and submission.”

She has waged a battle in New York, Washington and other cities to post a pro-Israel ad after numerous pro-Palestinian ads already have appeared.

WND also previously confirmed a Sky News Arabia report of the crucifixion of dissidents in Egypt.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/muslim-accused-of-beheading-2-christians-in-u-s/#2sV0lIOf5Z7U2VQM.99


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 20, 2013, 09:45:47 am
Pro 1:11  If they say, Come with us, let us lay wait for blood, let us lurk privily for the innocent without cause:
Pro 1:12  Let us swallow them up alive as the grave; and whole, as those that go down into the pit:
Pro 1:13  We shall find all precious substance, we shall fill our houses with spoil:
Pro 1:14  Cast in thy lot among us; let us all have one purse:
Pro 1:15  My son, walk not thou in the way with them; refrain thy foot from their path:
Pro 1:16  For their feet run to evil, and make haste to shed blood.
Pro 1:17  Surely in vain the net is spread in the sight of any bird.
Pro 1:18  And they lay wait for their own blood; they lurk privily for their own lives.



Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on March 04, 2013, 03:24:34 am
'We are above the law of the land'
Muslim's stunning claim at Texas rally for Islam


A leader for the Texas branch of the Council on American Islamic Relations has told a crowd at a rally for Islam that members of the faith really shouldn’t be bound by American law.

“If we are practicing Muslims, we are above the law of the land,” said Mustafa Carroll, the executive director of the Dallas-Fort Worth CAIR branch, a keynote speaker as the recent rally.
Ads by Google

    Windows Vista DriversWindows Vista Driver Downloads. Microsoft Certified. (Recommended) Windows-Vista.DriverUpdate.net
    Escape from America6 Places to Protect and Grow Your Wealth as US Spirals Out of Control www.Sovereign-Investor.com

The event was a rally in Austin, a part of the nationwide effort to hold “Muslim Capitol Day” events.

CAIR itself has been under investigation for its documented ties to terrorist organizations in the past. Some details revealed by Daniel Pipes are that:

    CAIR funded the Holy Land Foundation, which was used to funnel money to Hamas. President Bush shut down Holy Land Foundation, which CAIR called “unjust” and “disturbing.”
    CAIR denied Osama Bin Laden was behind 9/11, even though Bin Laden said so on camera.
    CAIR demanded removal of a billboard in Los Angeles in 1998 that described Osama bin Laden as “the sworn enemy,” saying that this description was “offensive to Muslims.” [Osama had by this point released his Declaration of War on the United States.]
    CAIR called the conviction of the 1993 WTC bombers “a travesty of justice.”
    CAIR called the conviction of Omar Abdel Rahman, the blind sheikh who planned to blow up New York City landmarks, a “hate crime.”
    CAIR labeled the extradition order for suspected Hamas terrorist Mousa Abu Marook “anti-Islamic” and “anti-American.”

CAIR also had on its advisory board Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the attempted 1993 WTC bombings. It was the same Siraj Wahhaj who was asked to deliver the “Juma,” or invocation at the Democratic National Convention for President Obama. He also once remarked, “It is my duty and our duty as Muslims to replace the U.S. Constitution with the Quran.”

big article
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/we-are-above-the-law-of-the-land/#xJptBOpBkKLWwM4V.99


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on March 04, 2013, 03:52:06 am
CAIR is a bunch of racists like the ADL.

While I agree that a religion isn't bound by a state's laws, the big difference in Christians answering to a higher law and Islam is that Islam wants to institute their way of life for all mankind on earth in a earthly carnal kingdom, while Christians look to a new heaven and earth.


Title: FL Megachurch pastor partners with former CAIR chairman to oppose “anti-sharia”
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on April 03, 2013, 11:11:19 pm
Florida: Mega church pastor partners with former CAIR chairman to oppose “anti-sharia” bill
http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2013/03/30/florida-mega-church-pastor-partners-with-former-cair-chairman-to-oppose-anti-sharia-bill/
3/30/13
Dr. Joel C. Hunter, senior pastor of the Northland Church in Longwood, Florida, asked Atif Fareed, former Chairman of CAIR Florida, to read Hunter’s statement opposing SB 58 Application of Foreign Laws in Certain Cases to the Florida Senate Committee on Governmental Oversight and Accountability on March 21, 2013.

Mega church senior pastor of 15,000 evangelical Christians partners with Islamist to oppose anti-Sharia bill in Florida Legislature.Perhaps you can educate Dr. Hunter with facts regarding Islam, Jihad, Islamists, CAIR, Sharia and Taqiyya.

Dr. Joel C. Hunter, senior pastor of the Northland Church in Longwood, Florida, asked Atif Fareed, former Chairman of CAIR Florida, to read Hunter’s statement opposing SB 58 Application of Foreign Laws in Certain Cases to the Florida Senate Committee on Governmental Oversight and Accountability on March 21, 2013.

Atif Fareed told the committee:

But I want to read something very important to you today.  I am a Muslim, but a senior pastor of an evangelical church, the Northland Church, Dr. Joel C. Hunter, he sent me an email yesterday afternoon and he wanted me to read this to you.  And this is how his letter goes exactly word by word:

“To my state senators:  As a pastor of one of the largest churches in Florida I believe  Senate Bill 58 will do more harm than good if enacted.  Its effect will be to increase bias rather than protection.  It seems to me to be a cure without a disease.  Existing law and judicial precedent have proved sufficient to deal with any concerns addressed by this proposed law.   Having confidence in both our constitution and the character of our judicial process I agree with the America Bar Association, the Anti-Defamation League and the American Civil Liberties Union that this law and House Bill 351 will be detrimental rather than the good intended.  As a conservative evangelical Christian it is unusual for me to side with the ACLU but I think objecting to unnecessary law is a conservative principle as well as a libertarian one.  In deed not making laws unless they are absolutely necessary is at the core of our character as a country.  Thank you for considering my views.  Dr. Joel C. Hunter, Senior Pastor Northland Church distributed.

To see the video recording of Atif Fareed’s presentation to the Senate Committee click here and advance the video to the 68 minute mark.

“I could not wait until the committee meeting was over to inquire if Joel Hunter actually authorized or requested Atif Fareed to present this statement to Florida Senators.”  Notes David Caton, Florida Family Association President.  “I sent the below email to Joel Hunter to which he affirmed Yes in less than five minutes.  He must be really proud to align with the Council on American Islamic Relations.”

Quote
From: “david caton”
To:    “joel hunter” <joel.hunter@northlandchurch.net>
 Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 11:26:05 AM
 Subject: Statement presented to Florida Senate

A gentleman just presented a statement allegedly authored by Dr. Joel Hunter condemning SB 58 Application of Foreign Law in Certain Cases.  Did Dr. Joel Hunter write and authorize this statement?

Quote
From: “Joel Hunter” <joel.hunter@northlandchurch.net>
 To: “david caton”
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 11:30:10 AM
 Subject: Re: Statement presented to Florida Senate

Yes.

Sent from my iPhone

Hunter claims he is a “conservative evangelical Christian…” yet:

•The Northland Church web site gives this bio of Hunter:  “Dr. Hunter served in the inaugural year on the President’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, which advised President Barack Obama on substantive policy issues, …. He continues as a spiritual advisor to the President.”

•Dr. Joel Hunter prayed during the 2008 Democratic National Convention where Barack Hussein Obama was nominated to run for president.  Click here to see his prayer on Youtube.com


more


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on April 04, 2013, 05:34:07 am
AH! THAT'S the reason. He's an Obama minion. Go figure. Yet again, supporting Islam and Obama end up in the same conversation.

But talk about sellout. How can a claimed Christian support anything Muslim? But to throw support behind Islam and Sharia law? That is no Christian. That's a wolf in sheep's clothing, or a demon in a suit and tie. Disgusting.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on April 18, 2013, 04:09:31 am
Deal approved in Muslims' suit against McDonald's

A judge on Wednesday finalized a $700,000 settlement between McDonald's Corp. and members of Michigan's Muslim community over claims a suburban Detroit restaurant falsely advertised its food as prepared according to Islamic law.

Ahmed Ahmed, the Dearborn Heights man who represents plaintiffs in the class-action suit, claims he bought a chicken sandwich in September 2011 at the restaurant but found it wasn't halal. Islam forbids consumption of pork, and God's name must be invoked before an animal providing meat for consumption is slaughtered.

The McDonald's restaurant chain and one of its franchise owners agreed in January to the tentative settlement that would be shared by Ahmed, as well as a Muslim-run Detroit health clinic, the Arab American National Museum in Dearborn and lawyers.

The two sides met Wednesday for final approval before Wayne County Circuit Judge Kathleen Macdonald, who has overseen the case and refereed objections by outside groups since a preliminary deal was announced in January. The settlement was originally set to be finalized March 1, but Macdonald extended the public comment period after pressure from Dearborn lawyer Majed Moughni, who criticized the class-action settlement on Facebook and was temporarily barred from communicating publicly about the case.

Ahmed's portion of the settlement is considered an "incentive award" and represents his work on the case, his attorneys say.

"As a firm, we've borne the burden of litigating this case for over 19 months, and have paid a steep price in time and money to do so," Kassem Dakhlallah, an attorney whose firm represents Ahmed and the class, told The Associated Press in an email. "We are happy that we are able to finalize this case and get the settlement funds paid to the Huda Clinic to be used for medical care for the community, and to the Arab American National Museum to be used to allow our young ones to continue their educations after high school."

Macdonald said she was "proud to preside over" the long case and resolution reached by both sides.

The lawsuit technically covered anyone who bought the halal-advertised products between September 2005 and January from the restaurant and another McDonald's in the city with a different owner. The other location wasn't a defendant or a focus of the investigation.

Dakhlallah has said he was approached by Ahmed, and they conducted an investigation. A letter sent to McDonald's and the restaurant franchisee, Finley's Management, by Dakhlallah's firm said Ahmed had "confirmed from a source familiar with the inventory" that the restaurant had sold non-halal food "on many occasions."

In the settlement notice, Finley's Management said it "has a carefully designed system for preparing and serving halal such that halal chicken products are labeled, stored, refrigerated, and cooked in halal-only areas." The company added it trains its employees on preparing halal food and "requires strict adherence to the process."

McDonald's attorney Thomas McNeill said the investigations and negotiations proved that if a problem arose, "it was isolated and rare."

Dakhlallah said giving money to the charities is the best outcome, since most people wouldn't have kept their receipts, making "identifying class members who have valid claims nearly impossible."

Moughni argues that Dakhlallah and his colleagues could have made greater attempts to find those who were harmed and, failing that, identified more relevant organizations, such as Dearborn's public schools. He said the clinic is several miles away from the restaurant and the museum has nothing to do with halal food.

Macdonald disagreed, calling the charities "appropriate recipients," but Moughni said he's considering an appeal.

"We think it's wrong," he said. "It's unfair for the class members."

There are only two McDonald's in the United States that sell halal products and both are in Dearborn, which has one of the nation's largest Arab and Muslim communities. Overall, the Detroit area is home to about 150,000 Muslims of many ethnicities.

http://bostonherald.com/business/business_markets/2013/04/deal_approved_in_muslims_suit_against_mcdonalds


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on April 18, 2013, 05:09:44 am
Is there a McDonalds in the US that serves kosher food just for Jews? Nope...

http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/11/kosher-mcdonalds-outside-of-israel/ (http://www.jewlicious.com/2009/11/kosher-mcdonalds-outside-of-israel/)

According to a 2002 report, there is nearly 2 million Jews in New York, and not a single kosher menu in the whole US.

And they have two halal McDonald's? In such a small US city? Something doesn't add up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_population_by_urban_areas (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_population_by_urban_areas)

Dearborn Michigan has a population of less than 100,000 people TOTAL. Michigan itself has about 10 million residents.

So, why is McDonald's bowing to Islam at all in the US? Statistically speaking, they are pretty much a small, nearly non-existent group.



Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on April 18, 2013, 06:22:33 am
And then there is this kind of stuff...

The "Gang of Eight" want to spend 50 million on helping illegal immigrants file for the amnesty the bill is offering.

How are these politicians still in office?

http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-bill-spend-50-million-advise-illegals-055033744.html (http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-bill-spend-50-million-advise-illegals-055033744.html)

Quote
The Senate’s Gang of Eight immigration bill offers $50 million in taxpayer-funded assistance to help illegal immigrants file for the multi-stage amnesty offered by the controversial bill.

The proposed spending is intended to help illegals get “registered provisional immigration status,” which is the first stage of the legalization process.

The money can be given to activist groups to support immigrants who need help “completing applications and petitions, including providing assistance in obtaining the requisite documents and supporting evidence … applying for any waivers for which applicants and qualifying family members may be eligible,” according to Section 2106, beginning on page 131 of the complex 844-page bill.

The very long bill also includes language granting the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to spend the money on other priorities.

The money can be used for “providing any other assistance that the Secretary or grantees consider useful or necessary to apply for registered provisional immigrant status,” the bill says.

Also, in more good news for illegal immigrants, the $50 million may be just a down payment. Section 2106(d)2(A) of the law provides a five-year authorization to congressional appropriations committees to spend even more taxpayer funds to help activist groups guide illegal immigrants in their quests for green cards as well as access to taxpayer aid and welfare programs.

“In addition to the amounts made available under paragraph (1), there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2014 through 2018 to carry out this section.”

The money is to be distributed by the secretary first “to eligible public or private nonprofit organizations.”

THAT is stone cold socialism, and a theft of public funds in an attempt to manipulate the situation through doling out federal cash to select people, all in the effort to help foreigners who are here illegally.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on April 22, 2013, 09:11:44 am
'The Quran is our constitution'
 
Tracing roots of Islamism inside the U.S.


“God is our Goal. The Prophet is our leader. The Quran is our constitution. Jihad is our way. Death in the service of God is the loftiest of our wishes. God is great, God is great.”
 
This is the motto of the Muslim Brotherhood, which was founded in Egypt as a vehicle to establish a worldwide Islamic empire governed by Shariah law. In “The Grand Deception”, a 70-minute film by the Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT), Steve Emerson traces the roots of Islamism inside the United States. This film examines the extent of Islamist influence within the country and highlights the danger it for all Americans.

Emerson, who broke the story of the U.S. suddenly deporting the original “person of interest” in connection with the April 15 Boston Marathon bombing, illustrates how the Brotherhood has transformed Islam into a political agenda, and this mix of religion and politics has become known as Islamism. Since the Brotherhood’s founding in 1928, it has established a presence in more than 70 countries, and countless organizations worldwide have adopted its strategy and goals.
 
“The Grand Deception” uncovers that today; organizations created by or inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood enjoy considerable influence within the United States. The government, media, and law enforcement often turn to these organizations when they want the pulse of the American Muslim community. But critics – Muslim and non-Muslim alike – say that engaging these organizations poses a danger.
 

According to these critics, although members of these organizations might appear to be moderate, they support an interpretation of Islam that is at odds with democracy and human rights as they are commonly understood in the Western world. Engaging these organizations bestows an undeserved legitimacy upon them and makes it easier for them to advance their secretive agenda.
 
Based extensively on primary source materials, as well as expert first-hand accounts and authentic archival material, “The Grand Deception” provides access to factual content and differentiates that content from a range of subjective viewpoints. From there you as a viewer are free to come to your own conclusion about the Muslim Brotherhood’s and radical Islam’s presence and progress in the United States.
 
Additional related and highly recommended titles:
 
The undercover exposé “Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America,”which reveals the insidious and well-funded efforts of the Muslim Brotherhood under the nonprofit guise of CAIR to fully support the international jihad against the United States.
 
“STOP THE ISLAMIZATION OF AMERICA: A Practical Guide to the Resistance,” in which renowned activist Pamela Geller answers the question “How can we defend America against Islamic supremacist encroachment?” by offering proven, practical guidance on how freedom lovers can stop jihadist initiatives in local communities.
 
“THE EVERLASTING HATRED” THE ROOTS OF JIHAD,” – a clear and eye-opening book that lays bare the complex roots of Islamic fundamentalism and its purpose: to replace the Judeo-Christian world order with an Islamic world order.


Read more + vVID at http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/the-quran-is-our-constitution/#VlTMppffUV7PHYfR.99


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Christian40 on May 10, 2013, 05:33:14 am
http://youtu.be/hUU1D7HFw48


Title: Islam Projected To Be Dominant UK Religion In 10 Years
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 17, 2013, 11:48:10 pm
Islam Projected To Be Dominant UK Religion In 10 Years
5/17/13
http://www.albanytribune.com/17052013-islam-projected-to-be-dominant-uk-religion-in-10-years/

One in 10 people under 25 are Muslim, while Christianity is in decline, the 2011 UK census reveals. An explosion in the Muslim population and an aging Christian demographic could mean Islam will be the dominant religion in the UK in 10 years.

A new analysis of the 2011 census by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed that the number of Christians was falling 50 per cent faster than had previously been thought. Earlier analysis of the statistics showed only a 15 per cent decline, but the ONS found that this figure had been beefed up by 1.2 million foreign-born Christians.

Furthermore, the re-analysis showed that the majority of Christians were over the age of 60 and for the first time less than half of young people describe themselves as Christian. As a result the ONS has calculated that in a decade only a minority will classify themselves as Christians in England. Christianity is still the dominant religion in the UK with over 50 per cent of the population regarding themselves as believers.

However, this may be set to change as the British Muslim population has surged dramatically over the past 15 years, increasing by 75 per cent in England and Wales. The 2011 census puts the Muslim population of the UK at around 5 per cent, a total that has been boosted by around 600,000 Muslim immigrants who have arrived in the UK over the past decade.

Keith Porteous Wood, executive director of the National Secular Society, said to UK daily the Telegraph that the decline of Christianity is “inevitable.” “In another 20 years there are going to be more active Muslims than there are churchgoers,” he said.

Moreover the number of people identifying themselves as atheists has increased by 10 per cent, rising from 15 per cent to 25 per cent. The change has been dubbed as a “significant cultural shift” by the British Humanist Association, while the Church of England has shrugged off the statistics, maintaining they still retain a strong base of believers.

“While this is a challenge, the fact that six out of 10 people in England and Wales self-identify as Christians is not discouraging. Christianity is no longer a religion of culture but a religion of decision and commitment. People are making a positive choice in self-identifying as Christians,” said a spokesperson for the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales told press in December.

In addition the census registered an increase in followers of Hinduism, Sikhism, Buddhism and Judaism.

‘Sleepwalking into segregation’

The rising number of immigrants and different ethnicities in the UK has given rise to increasing levels of segregation. Think tank ‘Demos’ has labeled the phenomenon ‘white flight’, citing the falling number of ethnic whites in areas where they are minorities.

Demos’ investigation revealed that new ethnic minorities like Somalis where moving into areas where older most established ethnic populations like Afro-Caribbeans had previously been dominant.

The population of London is indicative of the change in the British demographic with 600,000 white Londoners moving out of the capital in the past decade. In spite of the fact that the British capital’s population has grown by more than a million, the number of white British residents has decreased from 4.3 million to 3.7 million.

“We do have an integration problem,” said Demos director David Goodhart to RT. The “changing ethnic composition” of the British capital is causing a large exodus of ethnic white out of the city, he added.

Goodhart went on to say that the problem of integration was not confined to Great Britain and is prevalent all around the EU despite attempts to eradicate segregation.

“Part of the point of the euro was to disperse German power and prevent the rise of nationalism in Europe, but it has done precisely the opposite on both fronts. We now have serious national resentments in countries like Greece,” he stressed.

Trevor Phillips, the former chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission warned that the statistics did not spell good news for integration in the UK.


Title: Muslim Brotherhood infiltrating US college campuses
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 18, 2013, 10:13:50 am
Muslim Brotherhood infiltrating US college campuses
5/17/13

CHARLOTTE, May 17, 2013 – The infiltration of Amerca by the Muslim Brotherhood goes to the very heart of what we are witnessing in the realm of global terrorism, even before 9/11/01.

It has only been a few weeks since the media frenzy over the concept of self-radicalization of the brothers Tsaranaev and the Boston Marathon bombings. Most reports from those attacks suggested that the process of self-radicalization, or even Islamic radicalization in general, is a relatively brief process.

Not so, and it should be a cause for concern for every American.

As far back as 1988, an FBI informant working inside the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States issued a warning about a front called the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT). According to the anonymous FBI source, the IIIT was then in the first of six phases to “institute  Islamic Revolution in the United States.” The objective was to peacefully infiltrate the United States government and American universities.

That report was issued a full seven years after the Institute was founded in 1981 by Dr. Jamal Bazinji, Dr. Hisham Yahya Altalib, Dr. ‘Abdul Hamid Ahmad Abu Sulayman among others with seed money from the Muslim Brotherhood. Today, the IIIT has branches and offices in at least 15 countries worldwide and no less than 15 major colleges and universities in the United States.

A quick read of the overview on the IIIT website sounds innocent enough with wording that readily appeals to an intellectual community. “The International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) is a private, non-profit, academic, cultural and educational institution, concerned with general issues of Islamic thought and education. The Institute was established in the United States of America in 1981 (1401 AH). It is independent of local politics, party orientations and ideological bias. The headquarters of the Institute are situated in Herndon, Virginia.”

Seeking evidence of contributing to terrorist organizations, the FBI raided the IIIT headquarters in Herndon in 2002. Several members were arrested and found to be active leaders of terrorist organizations.

The Muslim Brotherhood itself lists IIIT in its top 30 organizations that have the goal of “a grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within.”

The FBI source also warned the Muslim Brotherhood had unlimited funds for the IIIT and has “set up political action front groups with no traceable ties to the IIIT or its various Muslim groups.” What is most frightening about that information is that the FBI report was verified in 1991.

Is anybody listening?

The mission statement and objectives of the IIIT can be found on their website: http://www.iiit.org/AboutUs/AboutIIIT/tabid/66/Default.aspx

The carefully stated words themselves may sound innocent enough, but a close reading between the lines shows differently if you research Koranic theology and text.

“Mission — The International Institute of Islamic Thought is dedicated to the revival and reform of Islamic thought and its methodology in order to enable the Ummah (Muslim nation) to deal effectively with present challenges, and contribute to the progress of human civilization in ways that will give it a meaning and a direction derived from divine guidance. The realization of such a position will help the Ummah regain its intellectual and cultural identity and re-affirm its presence as a dynamic civilization.”

“Objectives — In its endeavor to teach and prepare teachers for the modern world and produce intellectuals who can relate their Islam to modern day challenges the Institute aims to:

Serve as a think tank in the field of Islamic education, culture and knowledge.

Formulate a comprehensive Islamic vision and methodology that will help Muslim scholars in their critical analysis of contemporary knowledge.

Develop an appropriate methodology for understanding the Qur’an and the Sunnah of the Prophet.

Develop an appropriate methodology for dealing with Islamic legacy and contemporary knowledge, in order to draw on the experiences of both past and present, to build a better future for the Ummah and humanity at large.

Develop an appropriate methodology for understanding and dealing with the present situation of both the Ummah and the world in general, and the field of education in particular, in view of contemporary challenges and opportunities.

The Institute seeks to achieve its objectives by:

Teaching, training of teachers, publication of text books.

Supporting researchers and scholars in universities and research centers, and publishing selected scholarly, cultural and intellectual works, in English, Arabic and several other languages.”

Among the major universities that have embraced IIIT on their campuses are the United States Naval Academy, University of Delaware, American University, University of Maryland, Georgetown University and the University of Virginia.

Is is coincidental that so many of these institutions of higher learning are based in or near Washington, D.C?

Conspiracy theory? Perhaps, but the point is that radical terrorism is alive and well within our country and around the world, and it is not the result of impressionable young people becoming self-radicalized overnight.

The IIIT has been active in the United States for more than thirty years, yet it exists largely under the radar.


Read more: http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/what-world/2013/may/17/muslim-brotherhood-infiltrating-major-college-camp/#ixzz2TenThHx6
Follow us: @wtcommunities on Twitter


Title: Turkey to Build $100 Million Mega-Mosque in Maryland; Connected to Islamic Extre
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 21, 2013, 01:54:59 pm
Turkey to Build $100 Million Mega-Mosque in Maryland; Connected to Islamic Extremists
5/21/13
http://www.punditpress.com/2013/05/turkey-to-build-100-million-mega-mosque.html

On May 15th, the Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan and two leaders linked to the Muslim Brotherhood visited Lanham, Maryland to celebrate the future opening of a $100,000,000 mega-mosque. The project is being funded by the Islamic government of Turkey.

Erdogan has seen his share of controversy. In February, he stated that Zionism is a "crime against humanity." In June 1997, he stated, "The Jews have begun to crush the Muslims of Palestine, in the name of Zionism. Today, the image of the Jews is no different from that of the Nazis."

The Muslim Brotherhood and their connection to antisemitism and hatred needs no introduction.

Yet cheering him on at the ceremony "was the Maryland Secretary of State... and likely Democratic presidential candidate in 2016, Martin O’Malley." He even made a speech promoting the "sister city relationship" that Maryland and Turkey has.

At the ceremony, the Prime Minister "placed a ceremonial stone on a 15-acre construction site." That 15-acre construction zone represents something greater. In fact, the mosque will become "the largest and most striking examples of Islamic architecture in the western hemisphere," according to Muslim Link Paper.

The Clarion Project details the two Muslim Brotherhood members who attended:

The first, Naeem Baig, is the president of the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA). A 1991 U.S. Muslim Brotherhood memo, which says its “work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within,” lists ICNA as one of “our organizations and the organizations of our friends.” It even refers to meetings with ICNA with talk about a merger.

ICNA is linked to the Pakistani Islamist group Jamaat-e-Islami and its conferences feature radical speakers. A former ICNA president was recently indicted for horrific war crimes committed during Bangladesh’s 1971 succession from Pakistan – the torture and murder or 18 political opponents.

The second official from a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity that attended the event was Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). ISNA and several of its components are listed as U.S. Muslim Brotherhood fronts in the same 1991 Brotherhood memo. ISNA was also an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation case, dubbed the largest Islamic terror-funding trial in the history of the U.S. Federal prosecutors in the case also listed ISNA as a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity.

Construction of the mosque is scheduled to be finished by 2014.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Christian40 on May 24, 2013, 05:03:17 am
(http://1-ps.googleusercontent.com/h/www.clarionproject.org/sites/default/files/xTurkishMosqueMarylandIP.png.pagespeed.ic.qSPrf8fSdI.jpg)

The Clarion Project recently reported on the growing ties between the Turkish government and Native American tribes. With Congress' help, thousands of Turkish contractors and their families may be flooding into America's heartland and settling in semi-autonomous zones of the Native Americans, well out of the reach of American authorities.

The Clarion Project also reported on the Turkish Fethullah Gulen school network in America, which is currently under FBI investigation. The network is the largest charter school network in America.  It is the same network that has been a critical component in Turkey’s on-going transformation from a secular democracy into an Islamic state.

Erdogan and his Islamist government calls Hamas a “resistance” group, despite the fact that Hamas specifically targets Israeli civilians with suicide bombings and rocket attacks. Not surprisingly, Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal is a big admirer of Erdogan.

Since taking office in 2003, Erdogan has been implementing his Islamist agenda, slowly but steadily changing Turkey from a secular democracy to an Islamist state: College admissions have been changed to favor religious students, the military has been gutted of its secular generals (with one in five generals currently in prison on dubious charges) and women have been routed out of top government jobs. Honor killings in Turkey increased 1,400 percent between 2002 and 2009. Persecution of artists and journalists has become commonplace as opponents are charged with "crimes" like “denigrating Islam” and “denigrading the state.”

According to the Muslim Link, the new center will have five buildings, including a mosque “constructed using sixteenth century Ottoman architecture that can hold 750 worshipers.”

The Turkish American Culture and Civilization Center will be the largest Islamic site in the Western Hemisphere. The fact that it is being built by the government of Turkey represents the next step in Erdogan's desire to increase the Islamist influence in America.   

http://www.clarionproject.org/analysis/turkey-stakes-claim-america-100-million-mega-mosque


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on May 31, 2013, 05:34:58 pm
Feds suggest anti-Muslim speech can be punished

A U.S. attorney in Tennessee is reportedly vowing to use federal civil rights statutes to clamp down on offensive and inflammatory speech about Islam.

Bill Killian, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee, was quoted by the Tullahoma News this week suggesting that some inflammatory material on Islam might run afoul of federal civil rights laws.

"We need to educate people about Muslims and their civil rights, and as long as we’re here, they’re going to be protected," Killian told the newspaper.

Killian, along with the FBI special agent that runs the Knoxville office, are set to speak next week to a special meeting with the local Muslim community, informing them about their rights under federal law.

"This is an educational effort with civil rights laws as they play into freedom of religion and exercising freedom of religion," Killian said about the meeting. "This is also to inform the public what federal laws are in effect and what the consequences are."

Killian pointed to a recent controversy where a local Tennessee politician posted a photo of a man aiming a shotgun at the camera with the caption "How to wink at a Muslim."

"If a Muslim had posted ‘How to Wink at a Christian,’ could you imagine what would have happened?" Killian asked, according to the newspaper.

The Department of Justice did not respond Friday to a question about what guidelines it draws concerning offensive speech and Islam, or whether the department believes that civil rights statutes could be used to stifle criticism of Islam.

While threats directed at individuals or small groups can lead to punishment, First Amendment experts expressed doubt that the government has any power to stop offensive material about Islam from circulating.

"He’s just wrong," said Floyd Abrams, one of the country's most respected First Amendment attorneys. "The government may, indeed, play a useful and entirely constitutional role in urging people not to engage in speech that amounts to religious discrimination. But it may not, under the First Amendment, prevent or punish speech even if it may be viewed as hostile to a religion."

"And what it most clearly may not do is to stifle political or social debate, however rambunctious or offensive some may think it is," Abrams said.

A conservative watchdog group, Judicial Watch, accused the Obama administration of using federal law to specifically protect Muslims from criticism.

"In its latest effort to protect followers of Islam in the U.S. the Obama Justice Department warns against using social media to spread information considered inflammatory against Muslims, threatening that it could constitute a violation of civil rights," the group wrote in a blog post.

In recent years, the federal government has faced difficult questions about how to respond to material posted about Islam and the Prophet Muhammed — especially when the content causes riots or attacks abroad.

In 2010, a Florida pastor made international news when he threatened to burn 200 copies of the Koran on the ninth anniversary of the September 11th attacks.

The federal government admitted it was powerless to stop Jones, though President Barack Obama condemned the idea. Jones backed off from his September attempt, but later burned a Koran in 2012.

A similar controversy erupt when a Coptic Christian man posted the trailer for an anti-Muhammed film online — causing rioting and an attack on the U.S. Embassy in Cairo.

The Obama administration condemned the attack, while blasting the filmmaker for religious intolerance.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2013/05/feds-suggest-antimuslim-speech-can-be-punished-165163.html


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on June 01, 2013, 03:33:00 am
Quote
"We need to educate people about Muslims and their civil rights, and as long as we’re here, they’re going to be protected," Killian told the newspaper.

How about educating people about the evils of having respect of persons. The government protects Islam, but Christianity gets blasted and nobody even cares. ::)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on June 01, 2013, 07:49:06 am
Group sets meeting to increase tolerance of Muslims, culture

A special meeting has been scheduled for the stated purpose of increasing awareness and understanding that American Muslims are not the terrorists some have made them out to be in social media and other circles.

“Public Disclosure in a Diverse Society” will be held from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 4, at the Manchester-Coffee County Conference Center, 147 Hospitality Blvd.

Special speakers for the event will be Bill Killian, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee, and Kenneth Moore, special agent in charge of the FBI’s Knoxville Division.

Sponsor of the event is the American Muslim Advisory Council of Tennessee — a 15-member board formed two years ago when the General Assembly was considering passing legislation that would restrict those who worship Sharia Law, which is followed by Muslims.

Killian and Moore will provide input on how civil rights can be violated by those who post inflammatory documents targeted at Muslims on social media.

“This is an educational effort with civil rights laws as they play into freedom of religion and exercising freedom of religion,” Killian told The News Monday. “This is also to inform the public what federal laws are in effect and what the consequences are.”

Killian said the presentation will also focus on Muslim culture and how, that although terrorist acts have been committed by some in the faith, they are no different from those in other religions.

He referred to the 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing in which Timothy McVeigh, an American terrorist, detonated a truck bomb in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building on April 19, 1995. Commonly referred to as the Oklahoma City Bombing, the attack killed 168 people and injured more than 800.

It was the deadliest act of terrorism within the United States prior to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and remains the deadliest act of domestic terrorism in U.S. history. Terry Nichols was also charged and incarcerated as a coconspirator.

Killian also referred to the Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting on Aug. 5, 2012, when Wade Michael Page, an American white supremacist, fatally shot six people and wounded four others in a mass shooting at a Sikh temple in Oak Creek, Wis. Page committed suicide by shooting himself in the head after he was shot in the stomach by a responding police officer.

“Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols were both Christians as was the guy who shot up the Sikh temple,”
 no they weren't McVeigh was Catholic if that, but he was no Christian. http://www.ethicsdaily.com/news.php?viewStory=15532

Terry Nichols was athiest before getting saved in prison, so he wasnt a Christian at the time. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,122527,00.html

Wade Michael Page was a racist N@zi, so he wasnt a Christian either, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/08/wade-michael-page-violent-far-right

So what we have here is that Bill Killian is a LIAR and not very good at looking up facts.   Killian said. “Sikhs are not Muslim, Many people think they are Muslim, but they split off with the Hindu religion.”

Killian referred to a Facebook posting made by Coffee County Commissioner Barry West that showed a picture of a man pointing a double-barreled shotgun at a camera lens with the caption saying, “How to Wink at a Muslim.”

Killian said he and Moore had discussed the issue.

“If a Muslim had posted ‘How to Wink at a Christian,’ could you imagine what would have happened?” he said. I know what would happen, nothing. As they dont just post threats but run over and decapitate soldiers just walking down a street, or brutally cut off peoples heads making youtube vids. “We need to educate people about Muslims and their civil rights, and as long as we’re here, they’re going to be protected.”

Killian said Internet postings that violate civil rights are subject to federal jurisdiction.  :D

“That’s what everybody needs to understand,” he said. Yes, shut up or we will KILL you.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gZ6-6RbSEg

Killian said slide show presentations will be made.

Zak Mohyuddin, a Muslim Advisory Council member, said a shortened version of a documentary called “Welcome to Shelbyville” will also be featured.

The documentary, produced by the Public Broadcasting Service, spotlights recent demographic changes in nearby Shelbyville, with a focus on the growing number of immigrants from Latin America and Somalia with many Somalis from the Bantu minority ethnic group which practices Islam.

Mohyuddin said Muslims across the nation consistently issue press releases condemning terrorist acts, but the media usually does not pick up the information. He added that the apparent silence leaves the impression that Muslims do not condemn such acts.

Like Killian, Mohyuddin said word needs to be spread so more people understand the Muslim culture.

“It is in the self-interest of Muslims in the United States to counter violent extremism, because we and our children do not want to be viewed with suspicion,” Mohyuddin said. “The Muslim community is a vital resource in the fight against terrorism.”

Killian said he has made other presentations in the state about Muslim culture and civil rights laws, and the Muslims he’s become acquainted with are outstanding citizens.

“Some of the finest people I’ve met are Muslims,” he said, adding later: “We want to inform everybody about what the law is, but more importantly, we want to provide what the law means to Muslims, Hindus and every other religion in the country.

“It’s why we came here in the first place. In England, they were using Christianity to further their power in government. That’s why the First Amendment is there.”

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits making any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted on Dec. 15, 1791, as one of the 10 amendments that comprise the Bill of Rights.

http://www.tullahomanews.com/?p=15360


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on June 01, 2013, 05:14:09 pm
I have to say, I'm not sure what to make of that character "Achmed" being tolerated as it's been. When I first saw it, I cringed, thinking here comes the Islamic extremists complaining, issuing fatwahs and such. But nothing. Not a peep. Hmm. They really push the edge of comedy to get away with all kinds of stuff I guess.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on June 02, 2013, 06:06:42 am
Muslims Begin Construction On $100 Million American Mosque

“The Muslim call to prayer is one of the prettiest sounds on earth” – Barack Hussein Obama

On Wednesday, May 15, 2013, Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan placed a ceremonial stone on a 15-acre construction site in Lanham, Maryland that will likely become the largest and most striking examples of Islamic architecture in the western hemisphere.

what?? Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan is the head of State of Turkey. What is he doing, doing this in America?

The TACC Center will consist of five main buildings: a masjid constructed using 16th century classical Ottoman architecture that can hold 760 worshipers; a two-story, 19,990 SF Cultural Center Building including a 220-seating performance hall; a 9,850 SF recreational building with a 180-seat restaurant and traditional coffee shop; a 43,450 SF traditional Turkish bath for up to 22 people at a time and indoor pool and sports center; and 18,500 SF of guest housing including 16 one-bedroom apartment units.

rest: http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=14075


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on June 03, 2013, 04:33:11 am
Quote
“The Muslim call to prayer is one of the prettiest sounds on earth” – Barack Hussein Obama

No doctrinally correct Christian would say that! Real believers know what that sound signifies, which is evil.

Hey Barack, your Islamic slip is showing!


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on June 06, 2013, 05:31:01 am
Missouri Governor Vetoes Bill Banning Sharia Law Over Fear of Endangering Foreign Adoptions

Missouri Governor Jay Nixon has vetoed a bill that would have prevented judges in the state from using Sharia Law in their judgments, citing fears of endangerment of foreign adoptions and other international concerns.

Nixon appeared at a a press conference on Monday at the office of Lutheran Family and Children’s Services, where he explained his position.

“There are certainly problems facing our state and nation, but this isn’t one of them,” he said. “The laws passed in Jefferson City have real consequences. This bill could jeopardize a family’s ability to adopt children from other countries.”

Pastor Alan Erdman, the president of the adoption agency, agreed.

“[This legislation] would spell disaster for children and families, in addition to increasing the costs and processes that govern these adoptions,” he said.

However, the bill’s sponsor, Republican Senator Brian Nieves, called the notion “absurd.”

“If he would have said the bill might cause an invasion of flying armadillos, that would have been just as valid,” he stated. “I think the governor owes it to the people of Missouri to come clean [on the reason for the veto].”

Connect with Christian News 
But Nixon also outlined in his written statement that the legislation is unnecessary and “could invite retaliatory action by a foreign country by denying all adoptions to Missourians.”

The bill, known as “The Civil Liberties Defense Act,” does not specifically mention Sharia law (Islamic law), but was written with the intent of preventing Islam or other foreign religions from overtaking or influencing state law. The bill passed in the Senate 24-9 and 109-41 in the House of Representatives.

“Missouri’s been pretty fortunate as far as this goes.” Nieves said. “[And we want to ensure that the state] keeps things the way they are.”

Six other states have passed similar legislation. Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, South Dakota, Tennessee and Oklahoma have all agreed to prohibit state government agencies from using Sharia and other foreign laws in their decision-making processes. As previously reported, legislators in Kansas overwhelmingly passed the bill last May, with a unanimous vote in the House and only three dissenters in the Senate.

However, last year, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals also declared a law in Oklahoma unconstitutional which stated that “courts shall not consider international law or Sharia Law.”

Nieves may pursue an override vote in the legislature. However, if so, Faizan Syed, executive director of the St. Louis chapter of the Council of American-Islamic Relations, said that he would seek to influence legislators to defeat the override.

“Now that people know the arguments against these laws and what kind of problems they can cause, we’re confident that we can encourage enough legislators to be against the override,” he said.

Legislators need a two-thirds majority vote to override Nixon’s veto.

http://christiannews.net/2013/06/05/missouri-governor-vetoes-anti-sharia-bill-over-fear-of-endangerment-of-foreign-adoptions/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on June 06, 2013, 01:51:44 pm
Quote
“[This legislation] would spell disaster for children and families, in addition to increasing the costs and processes that govern these adoptions,” he said.

However, the bill’s sponsor, Republican Senator Brian Nieves, called the notion “absurd.”

Absurd is an understatement! More like treasonous.

Quote
The bill passed in the Senate 24-9 and 109-41 in the House of Representatives.

There are 163 House members, and 34 Senate members. So they had 13 House members that didn't vote, and 1 Senate member that didn't vote.

Quote
Legislators need a two-thirds majority vote to override Nixon’s veto.

Now the question is, do those who don't vote still count towards a veto? They shouldn't, which means they got more than 2/3 majority on both votes with those who voted. Something isn't adding up. Even if those non-votes count, they still got 2/3 in the House and Senate.

Somebody needs to explain that! I don't get it.

Looks like the people really wanted it, but one person, the governor, overrides the wishes of the people,claiming he's afraid what foreigners might think! They already hate the US you clown!  ::)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on June 07, 2013, 09:36:01 am
The Not-So-Veiled Threat to Non-Muslims in Tennessee

The attempted snow job by the American Muslim Advisory Council (AMAC) of Tennessee which sponsored the joint Department of Justice/FBI event, "Public Disclosure in a Diverse Society," Tuesday night in Manchester, Tennessee, did not work with the 2,000 attendees. Claims that American Muslims are loyal citizens, partners in counterterrorism investigations, part of radicalization prevention efforts, and an integral part of American society for centuries fell flat, especially coming from the host organization that was formed only two years ago in response to anti-shariah legislation in the Volunteer State.

A well-informed crowd responded with calls of "taqiyyah" when members of AMAC, a group that bills itself as "a bridge between the Muslim community and law enforcement," touted Muslim contributions to U.S. society and their dedication to upholding American values. (Taqiyyah doctrine obligates Muslims to deceive infidels as part the required effort or jihad to institute Islamic doctrine or shariah). In actuality, Muslim organizations have specifically instructed Muslims not to cooperate with law enforcement and have demanded that all counterterrorism-training materials be expunged of critical references to Islam and Muslims, as well the training instructors fired or retrained who fail to follow along.
 
When it became clear at Tuesday's event that the promulgation of lies was falling on deaf ears, one AMAC speaker resorted to shaming the audience for their alleged rudeness and intolerance. In the crowd's defense, the passionate response was one of righteous anger against a doctrine that increasingly threatens Western civilization and values in the wake of the Boston bombings and the murder and beheading of British soldier Lee Rigby. That indignation was also a response to the hypocrisy of a program designed to falsely portray Muslims as victims of prejudice in dire need of special civil rights protection from hate crimes. No mention was made of jihadist acts, honor killings, demands for special accommodations, and the Muslim disinclination to assimilate to American cultural norms.
 
To further insult the crowd, the AMAC speaker showed a condensed version of the video "Welcome to Shelbyville" in which Tennesseans were portrayed as ignorant, bigoted rednecks. The rejection of the Muslim presence in Tennessee was explained away by previous resistance to integrating blacks and Hispanics. The situation was addressed as one of racism and fear of the unknown rather than a very real fear of what Islamic doctrine requires Muslims to do. This was an educated crowd well aware that Islamic doctrine clearly states that Muslims must not befriend non-Muslims and are required to wage jihad to establish a global Islamic government under shariah. Attendees appeared very familiar with the enemy threat doctrine, Muslim aspirations to replace the Constitution with shariah, and ubiquitous calls from Muslims for "death to America" and "death to Christians and Jews."
 
It is particularly telling that no other group in the United States has been the focus of such a degree of attention and outreach, although FBI religious hate crime statistics from 2009 indicate that Jews are more than eight times more likely to be victims of religious hate crimes than Muslims. Yet there is no special protection afforded to Jews, no events announcing the prosecution of individuals who post material offensive to Jews, nor outreach programs to the American Jewish community to better serve their interests. When it comes to Jews and Christians, offensive remarks and portrayals are permitted under the First Amendment.
 
It is truly remarkable that the mission of an entire government agency, NASA, was reconfigured from space exploration and aerospace technology to Muslim outreach by the Obama administration in 2009. At that time, Obama required NASA to reach out to Muslims and help them "feel good about their historic contributions to science, math, and engineering."
 
Recently, Obama announced that he was launching the Muslim Outreach Summit to elicit feedback from American Muslims on how the government can better serve them. It is unprecedented for any group in the U.S. to receive this level of special consideration.
 
Following the Benghazi attack, Obama went to the UN and announced, "The future does not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam" and that "Intolerance is a form of violence." He didn't reference the desecrations of images of Jesus Christ and churches or voice concern about Holocaust denial. He mentioned only the criticism of Islam as a cause for concern and a reason to curtail free speech rights. Let us not forget that in the "Audacity of Hope," Obama avowed, "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."
 
DOJ attorney Bill Killian addressed the crowd by reading statutes verbatim from PowerPoint slides that defined hate crimes, civil rights violations, and federally prescribed violations and penalties. Prior to the event, he had released this statement: "This is an educational effort with civil rights laws as they play into freedom of religion and exercising freedom of religion.... This is also to inform the public what federal laws are in effect and what the consequences are." However, the DOJ and FBI have not scheduled meetings addressing the concerns of any other group but Muslims. Twelve such outreach sessions are planned for Tennessee alone.
 
FBI Special Agent Kenneth Moore ridiculed the idea that the evening was intended to threaten citizens with the possibility of prosecution and imprisonment for offending Muslims. He pointed out that despite the raucous conduct exhibited during the event and the protests, no one would be arrested that evening as evidence of the government's commitment to the First Amendment. However, the crowd remained unconvinced that their free speech rights were not in jeopardy at some future point as part of the government's program to accommodate the demands of Muslim and Islamic doctrine.
 
The event presented messages on two levels. Overtly, Muslims attempted to airbrush their image in America as having nothing to do with supremacy, triumphalism, and terrorism. A few hijabed members of the AMAC even sported T-shirts with messages supporting the First Amendment to apocryphally showcase their dedication to American principles and laws.
 
As for government officials, they ostensibly conducted an informational session on legal statutes related to offensive statements and reassured the crowd that arrests would not take place. But the covert message was clear: This event was held to reinforce the supremacy of Muslims and their civil rights as no other group has been afforded this level of deference or accommodation. It was a veiled threat to non-Muslims that Muslims and Muslims alone will receive special protection by the government and hate crime prosecutions are on the table at some future point. Americans beware.
 
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/06/the_not-so-veiled_threat_to_non-muslims_in_tennessee.html#ixzz2VXcMhGBh


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on June 07, 2013, 10:34:21 am
CNN did a news profile on this small town in TN in their battles with sharia law infiltrating them - it was either last year or the year before. It started out as this town firmly against it, but by the news show's end(it was an hour long), not only did the city court/council(forgot which) start to favor sharia, but it looked like the community may have slowly started to side with it too.

Either you put your faith in Christ, or your faith in the world. There's no such thing as "good" and "evil" forces in the world. As history has shown, you side with the world, you will be playing by their rules, plain and simple.

Mat 7:24  Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:
Mat 7:25  And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock.
Mat 7:26  And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand:
Mat 7:27  And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.
Mat 7:28  And it came to pass, when Jesus had ended these sayings, the people were astonished at his doctrine:
Mat 7:29  For he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on June 07, 2013, 01:19:44 pm
Quote
"Public Disclosure in a Diverse Society," Tuesday night in Manchester, Tennessee, did not work with the 2,000 attendees.

Quote
Attendees appeared very familiar with the enemy threat doctrine, Muslim aspirations to replace the Constitution with shariah, and ubiquitous calls from Muslims for "death to America" and "death to Christians and Jews."

Rednecks don't forget. They still got a burr under their saddle from the Civil War, so naturally they are real suspicious of anybody wanting to move in to their neck of the woods.

I'm familiar with that town, Manchester, TN. My grandparents use to have a house there next to my grandfather's brother. It's also where I learn to drive a stick shift. Use to go rabbit hunting in that area, and still have relatives there.

All I can say is that Islam will have to force it's way on the people in that area. They still hate communists there, unlike the US government.

I can tell you those people there aren't stupid. They just want you to think that, as they just smile and wave, drinking their co-cola and peanuts with a Moon Pie. Southerners are slow to anger, but they don't forget. You get on the wrong side of them, you won't know it till suddenly one day you realize they won't have anything to do with you, and not a word is said. They just ignore you and go on about their business, and good luck doing business once they turn their back on you. Your better off just moving away, because that dog won't hunt.

Islam ain't seen nothin' like a southern redneck!

And I can assure you, they mean it when they yell "Get off my land!", which is usually followed by a shell being racked!


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on June 18, 2013, 07:46:07 am
School Recites Pledge in Arabic, One Nation Under Allah?

A Colorado high school principal is defending his decision to allow students from a cultural club to recite the Pledge of Allegiance in Arabic — and denied that it was attempt to push an Islamic agenda.
 
FOLLOW TODD ON FACEBOOK FOR CULTURE WAR NEWS. CLICK HERE TO JOIN!
 
 
 
Tom Lopez, the principal at Rocky Mountain High School in Fort Collins, told Fox News he has received a number of telephone calls and emails from outraged parents – but he stands by his decision.
 
“These students love this country,” he said. “They were not being un-American in trying to do this. They believed they were accentuating the meaning of the words as spoken regularly in English.”
 
The school recites the Pledge of Allegiance once a week and on Monday a member of the Cultural Arms Club led the student body in the Arabic version of the pledge.
 
The club seeks to “destroy the barriers, embrace the cultures” that exist within the high school.
 
Danielle Clark, communications director of the Poudre School District, said they understand why parents are upset.
 
“We understand not everybody would agree with the students’ choice,” she told Fox News. “We’ve heard there are some who are upset.”
 
On the other hand, she said she received one email from a person who “thought it was a great thing.”
 
Clark said the cultural club has a history of reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in a number of different languages.
 
“It’s not just Arabic,” she said.
 
Last year, the group found itself in a firestorm of controversy after reciting the pledge in Spanish.
 
“This is a student-initiated and student-led club,” Clark  said. “There is no school sponsor or advisor. It doesn’t come under the umbrella of the district.”
 
She said the students simply asked the principal permission as a courtesy.
 
“We deferred to the students because it’s their deal,” she said.
 
Club members said they don’t understand why there’s a controversy.
 
“No matter what language it’s said in, pledging your allegiance to the United States is the same in every language,” student Skyler Bowden told The Coloradoan.
 
But an Arabic translation of the Pledge of Allegiance would have replaced “one nation under God” with “one nation under Allah.”
 
“Obviously in Arabic, you would use the word Allah, but Christian Arabs would use the word Allah,” said Ibrahim Hooper, of the Council on American Islamic Relations. “It’s not necessarily specific to Islam and Muslims.”No they wouldnt, as Allah is the name of the pagan MOON god. So no Christian would ever invoke the name of Allah.
 
Clark said she did not hear the pledge and does not speak Arabic so she could not confirm exactly what words were used.
 
Some local residents said the pledge should be recited in English. Others wondered if there was another reason involved.
 
“This is no longer about language,” wrote one reader in a letter to the local newspaper. “This is about targeting a group you know will object, intentionally stirring them up under the guise of your opinions on multiculturalism and subjecting your school and community to a divisive issue for absolutely no gain.”
 
Lopez said he’s been getting bombarded by all sorts of accusations – one critic even labeled him a traitor.
 
“They claim they are outraged that this is blaspheming a real major tenet of our patriotism – which in their mind the Pledge of Allegiance is only in English,” he said.
 
He’s also been accused of “pushing a Muslim Brotherhood agenda – to push Islam into the school.” That’s a claim that Lopez denied.
 
Hooper told Fox News he was dumbfounded by complaints about the Arabic version of the pledge.
 
“How on earth is it un-American to recite the Pledge of Allegiance in another language,” Hooper asked. “It doesn’t make sense unless the people complaining are anti-Muslim or anti-middle eastern bigots.”
 
Principal Lopez said he was getting “worn down” by the complaints and the sense of “hate” among some of the critics.
 
“I’ve been shocked with prejudicial statements that have been made,” he said. ” I’ve been shocked with the lack of seeking understanding. There’s definitely suspicion and fear expressed in these people’s minds. There’s some hate.”
 
But some residents say they feel strongly that the Pledge should be recited in English.
 
“As a veteran and a friend of a man killed defending these children in their little games they like to play with our pledge, I’m offended,” wrote Chris Wells on the Daily Coloradoan. “There are things that we don’t mess with – among them are the pledge and our anthem.”
 
“If they wish to adapt the country as their own, then they need to learn the language and start speaking it as their first language,” wrote another reader.
 
Hooper suggested the students could use the incident as a learning “opportunity that there is real intolerance and bigotry out there.”

http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/school-recites-pledge-in-arabic-one-nation-under-allah.html


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on June 18, 2013, 12:01:37 pm
Quote
“Obviously in Arabic, you would use the word Allah, but Christian Arabs would use the word Allah,” said Ibrahim Hooper, of the Council on American Islamic Relations. “It’s not necessarily specific to Islam and Muslims.”No they wouldnt, as Allah is the name of the pagan MOON god. So no Christian would ever invoke the name of Allah.

So then, what do Arabic-speaking people say if they don't use the Arabic word "allah"?

We need to make sure the distinction is made between context and meaning of a word.

You would have two people speaking Arabic, no, three people.

One is secular, one is Muslim, and one is Christian. They all only speak Arabic.

I contend that they all would use the Arabic word for God. Now is there a different Arabic word to denote "a god" from "God of Abraham"? That I don't know. Seems like there would be. If not, it makes it easy. All of them would use the same word for a god.

Now Muslims may use that specific Arabic word because they believe it means their Islamic god. If that particular usage refers to the so-called "moon god", then it would stand to reason a Christian wouldn't want to use that word. SO, what Arabic word would a Christian use?


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on June 18, 2013, 12:45:00 pm
"fighting intolerance" seems to be the new norm in America - and no, it has nothing to do with Civil Rights. This time around, it has a lot to do with forcing people to accept and love evil.

1The 5:22  Abstain from all appearance of evil.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on June 18, 2013, 01:35:32 pm
So then, what do Arabic-speaking people say if they don't use the Arabic word "allah"?

We need to make sure the distinction is made between context and meaning of a word.

You would have two people speaking Arabic, no, three people.

One is secular, one is Muslim, and one is Christian. They all only speak Arabic.

I contend that they all would use the Arabic word for God. Now is there a different Arabic word to denote "a god" from "God of Abraham"? That I don't know. Seems like there would be. If not, it makes it easy. All of them would use the same word for a god.

Now Muslims may use that specific Arabic word because they believe it means their Islamic god. If that particular usage refers to the so-called "moon god", then it would stand to reason a Christian wouldn't want to use that word. SO, what Arabic word would a Christian use?

The arab word for god is " Ilah ", Muhammad used the moon gods name Allah.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on June 19, 2013, 03:04:19 am
Okay, so is that word "Ilah" capitalized to mean THE God of Heaven, or should it be lower case to mean "a god"?

From what your saying, the word "Allah" is a proper noun, a name, not a title or description, and "ilah" is the Arabic word to mean "god", and "Ilah" to mean God Almighty?

Personally, I haven't seen anybody describe the difference, and have never read or heard that word "Ilah" before.

http://www.islam101.com/tauheed/ilah.htm (http://www.islam101.com/tauheed/ilah.htm)

It seems from what I read at this site (honestly no clue if the author is correct or some Islamic heretic), but they seem to explain that the word "ilah" does mean "god" or "a god" in the general sense, more or less. Allah however is used as a proper name to mean their Islamic "God".

"Ilah" is not used it looks like as much as the lower case, because they describe the word to be used as saying something is considered their "ilah", and it could be a god, or even a man, or an object.

Quote
Invoke not; or pray to, any ilah along with Allah. There is no ilah but He.2

(28 : 88) Surat Al Kassas

See how they use the word? "ilah" is used to mean "a god", while "Allah" to them means "God".

The only other question is do Muslims believe when they use the word "Allah", do they think they are talking about the same god as the god of the Jews?

I realize in reality Muslims are worshiping a false god. I get that. But what I'm trying to clarify is how Muslims believe what the words mean to them, what they think they mean, versus what an Arabic speaker thinks the words mean.

Seems like an Arabic-speaking person that is not Muslim would not use "Allah" if they didn't believe in Islam, as it looks like in Islam, they call their god "Allah", while a non-Muslim would use "Ilah" for God, and "ilah" for "a god".

Not speaking the language makes it a bit tricky!  ::)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on June 19, 2013, 09:48:21 am
Very interesting...


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on June 26, 2013, 07:13:13 am
wow, they usualy send the Police when there is a Bible study in someones home. Especially in Arizona.

Illinois County Board to Consider Permitting Islamic Prayer Center Amid Federal Lawsuit

A county board in Illinois is considering granting a permit to a Muslim organization that seeks to turn a residential home into an Islamic prayer center.
 
The matter has been ongoing for the past three years, as in 2010, the Islamic Center of Western Suburbs submitted plans to the DuPage County Board, noting that the area in Western Chicago had no house of worship for Muslims. However, when neighbors began to express opposition, the group withdrew its request for a time.
 
“It’s not a freedom of religion issue. It’s a zoning issue,” resident Ron Cwik told the Chicago Tribune. “The question is, should a significant commercial enterprise redevelop the land and be allowed to build in my neighborhood. Currently, there is no commercial activity in our neighborhood, and I beg you not to let one be established here.”
 
Some neighbors stated that the project would increase traffic and lower property values, so zoning officials came up with stipulations involving the number of people that could occupy the facility at once.

rest: http://christiannews.net/2013/06/25/illinois-county-board-to-consider-permitting-islamic-prayer-center-amid-federal-lawsuit/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on June 26, 2013, 12:52:59 pm
Quote
wow, they usualy send the Police when there is a Bible study in someones home. Especially in Arizona.

In all fairness to us Arizonans, that's not true.

The truth is that there was I think two cases of bible studies that were stopped by authorities. One was in Gilbert, just a few miles away from me, which is the explanation all on it's own; Gilbert plays hardball.

In both cases, the people were in fact in violation and they knew it. They were just trying to skirt zoning laws by claiming a bible study of a few friends. The one place had gone so far as to build a big building on their property for their "studies". Bull, it was a church building and they knew it. Not to mention the traffic issues, in a residential neighborhood.

If you wade through the claims of being persecuted, one usually sees it's not what it appears.

Almost always, it's a group of church-goers that have decided to run their own church out of their house. THAT I don't agree with, especially since all that I've heard of were typical churchianity products, trying to pull a fast one.

I believe in gathering, yes, but not in the form those people are trying. They are doing it no different than the churches, just in a smaller location, and usually it means those people are no longer going to, and financially supporting, some church business. That will make some people in the church business rather upset. They want people in their buildings, not in private homes, because where the people are, is where the tithes are!

We know the world will whine about Christians. Count on it, and just learn to ignore it. God will answer their complaining soon enough.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on July 02, 2013, 02:51:05 pm
Governor Bill Haslams deliberate attempt to make Tennessee Sharia compliant- The Timeline

Governor Bill Haslams deliberate attempt to make Tennessee Sharia compliant- The Timeline
 
Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam has made it clear by his repeated actions that he will pursue a policy that promotes the interest of Islamist and their radical ideology as long as he is governor.
 
The attempted takeover of our great state by the left, the progressive or the communist was expected. What was not expected was the underhanded approach by Governor Bill Haslam to dismantle our sovereignty one step at a time, methodically, making our state Sharia compliant with his policies.
 
Republican In Name Only Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam has done all within his power to provide the venue for our demise.
 
Governor Bill Haslam is undeniably preparing our state to be Sharia compliant utilizing a very powerful political Islamic machine that is hell bent on overriding our Constitution for the demands of a few while injecting their own beliefs on the majority demanding that the Constitution be upheld!
 
Governor Haslams intent must be questioned. His seemingly purposeful  yielding to political Islam must be countered.
 
Governor Haslam, big Oil Billionaire,  big coal investor has positioned himself to be a middle eastern darling of CAIR, AMAC, ACO, Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood and by his actions is doing all within his power to promote a nutrient rich environment for Islam/Sharia to flourish. The naiveté and neckbreak speed he is moving forward is detestable.
 
The timeline below puts his efforts into a chronological order of which he can’t deny.
 
His meaningful steps to turn our state into a sharia compliant state while pacifying political Islam is obvious when you look at the steps that he and those around him have taken to get us there chronologically.
 
From his liberal “Mayors against Guns” days to the Muslim Diversity class given by Islamic extremists with a healthy assist from the DOJ, AMAC and the FBI is proof that this mans agenda does not include keeping our state sovereign and all our rights on equal footing.
 
He, whether he acknowledges it or not is paving the way, purposefully, and it should be stopped immediately. His actions are louder than his words.
 
The duality inside the political Islamic machine must be understood before our own Governor Bill Haslam sees his errant ways and to date he shows no signs of repentance.
 
Some Americans are expressing we honor their rights while expecting others to give up others inalienable God given rights does not seem like fair play prime for negotiation. 
 
Changing the laws to make others political wishes dominant is not a way to gain acceptance of your way of life or acceptance of your religious beliefs.
 
For Governor Bill Haslam to seemingly have the ability to make this happen with a wave of his wand sounds less than desirable inside a constitutional republic that is begging for sound leadership.
 
The visual timeline of the Haslam deception cannot be denied. The items were compiled and although not all inclusive sheds light on the methodical dismantling of our state by one man dead set on placating to political Islam while ignoring the rights and beliefs of the remaining 99 percent throughout the state.
 
Read and weep if you desire:
 
2009- Haslam was formerly a member of the Mayors Against Illegal Guns Coalition with Mayor Bloomberg (NY) but resigned early in 2009 and became a member of the National Rifle Association just in time to run for office of Governor.
 
March 2009- Thousands of Somali refugees from United Nations refugees arrive in Shelbyville. Quickly growing to 63,000 under Bill Haslams reign with nearly a billion dollar taxpayer tag.
 
November 2, 2010- Republican Bill Haslam has been elected Tennessee’s 49th governor, overcoming his rival’s claims that he was a “billionaire oil man” and has his own controversial statements on gun rights.
 
2011 Legislative session – anti-terrorism bill introduced based on the Carlos Bledsoe case (Memphis man who shot and killed Pvt. Andrew Long at the Little Rock Army recruiting center.)
 
May 2011- Tenn: DOJ submits teachers, principals, police to Muslim “sensitivity” training
 
June, 2011 – picture emerges confirming that the Muslim Rapid Response Team (which morphed into the TN American Muslim Advisory Council) had been working behind the scenes during the legislative session with TN DHS James Cotter.  This was the group that had formed to lobby against the anti-terrorism bill.
 
June 5, 2011- Tenn: Fed and state agencies refuse to identify Muslim group in taxpayer funded terrorism conference
 
August 2011- Al Qaeda’s Recruitment Cartoon & Knoxville News Sentinel’s Comics Target Children
 
October 2011- Hutton Hotel in Nashville submits to sharia, cancels speech on “preserving freedom”
 
November 7, 2011 – Commissioner Bill Gibbons (TN Department of Safety and Homeland Security), sends congratulatory letter to the AMAC members for organizing along with the Governor- approved partnership with TN DHS.
 
November 2011- Regarding comment that all Muslims should be purged from the US military. Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam (R) told The Nashville Scene, “I don’t think I would agree with Rick on that.” But when pressed to denounce Womick’s comments, as Muslim community groups have been urging, Haslam came up short, saying “I don’t know that’s my role. I would just say that on that issue I don’t agree with Rick.”
 
December 2011:  When asked whether Governor Haslam had appointed a Muslim advisory board, Tennessee GOP Chairman Chris DeVaney responded that he had ”checked into this and apparently there is no truth to it.  It must be some kind of rumor.“
 
December 2011 – AMAC partners with the TN DHS to do first law enforcement training.
 
December 2011- Sumner County School system-Tennessee mom finds Islam in kid’s textbook, Sharia compliance discussed.
 
2012 legislative session – Commissioner Gibbons, testifies in support of an administration bill permitting the TN DHS to enter into partnership agreements with private non-profit organizations like the AMAC.
 
February 2012 – AMAC partners again with TN DHS for law enforcement training; TN DHS refuses to disclose any information about the AMAC.
 
March 2012- Judge allows defendants in underage sex trafficking ring Muslim prayer breaks during trial. Muslim immigrants involved.
 
March 2012 – In reference to SB 2237/HB 2375 which would exclude Tennessee state government from partnering/entering into contracts with organizations like AMAC, Attorney General Cooper issues an opinion stating “…it is the opinion of this Office that the proposed amendment which would add an exclusion providing that no partnership or contractual agreement shall be entered into with any religious or political organizations, or any affiliate organizations, is constitutionally defensible.”
 
April 2012-Segregated swimming for Muslim “sisters” creeps into Nashville ( at the city’s taxpayer-funded South Knoxville Community Center.) & Virginia (Tysons Corner, Virginia)
 
April 2012-Judge in Tenn. mosque trial says expert witnesses on jihad cannot testify
 
April 2012- Bill Gibbons, Tennessee State Commissioner of the Department of Safety and Homeland Security (DSHS), establishing a partnership with a religious NGO, the American Muslim Advisory Council (AMAC) which has ties to local Muslim Brotherhood leaders via the American Center for Outreach (ACO). ACO is a Tennessee-based, non-partisan organisation that was established to inform, educate and empower Muslims to become engaged in society by providing the assistance and guidance the community needs.
 
May 2012- Governor vetoes bill that would have protected Christian student organizations at Vanderbilt and state universities.
 
May 2012- Nashville: 3 convicted, 6 acquitted in Somali sex trafficking case. Sex trafficking is quickly becoming a major problem in TN after Somali refugees transferred to Nashville, TN.
 
May 2012 – Governor approves appointment of Shariah Compliant Finance specialist Samar Ali as Economic and Community Development (ECD) International Director with known ties to Muslim Brotherhood and International Arab Bank.
 
May 2012 – AMAC trains TN Dept of Children’s Services.
 
May 2012- Refused to sign the Agenda 21 resolution passed by the state legislature (note that all Republicans voting in both the House and Senate voted yes).
 
July 20, 2012 – Full-page ad in The Tennessean of the Resolution opposing Governor Haslam’s administration partnership with the AMAC and the hiring of Shariah Compliant Finance Specialist, Samar Ali
 
July 2012- Williamson County Republican Party, the Stewart County Republican Party, the Carroll County Republican Party have submitted a resolution stating “The Governor of the Great State of Tennessee and his administration have demonstrated a consistent lack of conservative values. Mainly over his hiring of Sharia Compliance expert Samar Ali.
 
July 2012- GOP state Senate candidate Woody Degan of Shelby County charged the Haslam administration was “making our Economic Development Department Sharia compliant,” in part by hiring Ali as international director earlier this year.
 
July 2012- “Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam has elevated and/or afford [sic] preferential political status to Sharia adherents in Tennessee, thereby aiding and abetting the advancement of an ideology and doctrine which is wholly incompatible with the Constitution of the United States and the Tennessee Constitution,” the Williamson (County Republican Party)  resolution, dated 7/10/12
 
July 2012- Kevin Kookogey, chairman of the Williamson County Republicans: “To date, the Haslam Administration has displayed an unfortunate ignorance to the threat of Shariah,”  “They seem willing to accept the claims and defense of the Muslim Brotherhood at face value, refusing to even consider that, perhaps, those bent on destroying Western Civilization might just be infiltrating our institutions.
 
August 2012- Nihad Awad, Executive Director of CAIR travels to Murfreesboro to celebrate opening of mosque.
 
August 15, 2012 – Deputy Governor Claude Ramsey issues a letter defending Commissioner Gibbons’ partnership with the AMAC and the Haslam administration’s appointment of Shariah Compliant Finance specialist, Samar
 
August 24, 2012 – After listening to Islamic Networks Group (ING) founder speak on the subject of “Women and Shariah”, ACO intern Jihan Abdulla tells The Tennessean that as Muslim woman she feels like she has more rights than American women
 
August 2012 – Islamic Networks Group (ING) provides AMAC-sponsored training for their Islamic Speakers Bureau
 
September 2012 – James Cotter, the TNDHS Regional Advisor who met with the MRRT in June 2011 and who claims that approval for the AMAC went to the Governor, is promoted to the position of State Training Advisor
 
September 2012 – AMAC co-chairs Daoud Abudiab and Zulfat Suara join the Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition (TIRRC) Board of Directors
 
February 2013- Libraries all across the state of Tennessee recieve National Endowment for the Humanities grants, which is financing the “Muslim Journeys” books/videos series to be placed in Tn libraries. The books are “intended to address both the need and desire of the American public for trustworthy and accessible resources about Muslim beliefs and practices and the cultural heritage associated with Islamic civilizations”
 
May 2013- Al-Jazeera plans to open a news bureau in Nashville.The Tennessean reports the news organization that bought Al Gore’s Current TV for $500 million earlier this year has said it will begin broadcasting Al-Jazeera America sometime late this summer. Vanderbilt religious studies lecturer Abdulkadir Gure said Nashville probably was chosen because it is geographically, politically and demographically central.
 
June 2013- Sends DOJ and FBI to prepare Manchester residents for acceptance of Sharia into their communities and to warn of negative posts about Islam on social websites you may face fines and imprisonment. Haslams office denies any knowledge of diversity event in Manchester TN.
 
The journey you just took should be more than enough to convince you that Governor Haslam has someone in his pocket. The “bank” so to speak should be obvious and should be enough to make you ask him some questions. Let’s assume he is not listening. While his head is turned let’s elect someone that cares about Tennesseeans!
 
Remember this timeline on election day!

http://bradleycountynews.wordpress.com/2013/06/27/governor-bill-haslams-deliberate-attempt-to-make-tennessee-sharia-compliant-the-timeline/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on July 03, 2013, 03:38:59 am
Quote
June 2013- Sends DOJ and FBI to prepare Manchester residents for acceptance of Sharia into their communities and to warn of negative posts about Islam on social websites you may face fines and imprisonment.

I still have family that lives there. My grandparents use to have a house there too.

It's hard to imagine that people in of all places TN, would be so ignorant of what the state governor is up to. How can they not see what the federal government is doing?

Apparently, some in the South indeed have forgot, and now the federal government is at it again, but this time they have an inside person as governor.

I'm all but convinced, based on this kind of stuff going on, that there is a Muslim in the White House, and he's lying about it. And he and his cohorts are in the process of setting up the country for a take over.

I'm nearly speechless. If it weren't for prophecy, I'm not sure how I would take all this. I never imagined that southerners would be so easily duped by the federal government, considering history and all.

I had relatives fight for the South in that area south of Nashville once upon a time. That area is my family's area, and now it's like it's a foreign land.

Even though I know things will turn bad, and this world is temporal, but so far, it's all we know, and I still can't help but be sad to see this happening to what I once thought was a great country to live in.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 12, 2013, 03:12:21 am
Quote
Republican In Name Only Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam has done all within his power to provide the venue for our demise.
 
Governor Bill Haslam is undeniably preparing our state to be Sharia compliant utilizing a very powerful political Islamic machine that is hell bent on overriding our Constitution for the demands of a few while injecting their own beliefs on the majority demanding that the Constitution be upheld!


Hate to say it again, but Churchianity struck again - it seems like every time a "Republican" runs for office, they will just blindly follow that candidate even if it means taking a bullet for them. Yes, I know both political parties are merely 2 opposites sides of the same Hegelian Dialectic, but nonetheless Churchianity will be dead silent when a GOP person is in political power, which is why the Illuminati minions end up pushing their agendas easier(ie-Reagan and George W. had no problems pushing pro-abortion agendas, as well as illegal wars in the ME).

Now that Obama is in office, this same group of people are finally "waking up" somehow - but they've missed the train, sadly.

1Peter_4:17  For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?

Quote
I'm all but convinced, based on this kind of stuff going on, that there is a Muslim in the White House, and he's lying about it. And he and his cohorts are in the process of setting up the country for a take over.

George W. was the first President to celebrate Ramada(sp) at the White House, FWIW. With that being said, maybe there's truth to the rumors that Obama is a CIA creation.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on July 12, 2013, 04:52:56 am
Quote
maybe there's truth to the rumors that Obama is a CIA creation.

I don't believe they are rumors.

They may be tossing out comments that it's a rumor for misdirection, but in reality, all indications point to Obama being a CIA-created Muslim. Even both his parents were tied to the CIA. That is a fact.

Seriously, he's a product of Occidental College, a known CIA launch pad...

http://www.lewrockwell.com/2010/09/wayne-madsen/the-story-of-obama-allinthecompany/ (http://www.lewrockwell.com/2010/09/wayne-madsen/the-story-of-obama-allinthecompany/)

Quote
Investigative journalist Wayne Madsen has discovered CIA files that document the
agency's connections to institutions and individuals figuring prominently
in the lives of Barack Obama and his mother, father, grandmother,
and stepfather. The first part of his report highlights the connections
between Barack Obama, Sr. and the CIA-sponsored operations in Kenya
to counter rising Soviet and Chinese influence among student circles
and, beyond, to create conditions obstructing the emergence of independent
African leaders. (cont.)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on July 12, 2013, 06:20:21 am
I just put it together!  ::)

Bill Haslam, TN governor, and the owner of the Browns, Jimmy Haslam are brothers...

Quote
http://www.tn.gov/governor/about.shtml

Quote
After graduating with a degree in History, Bill and Crissy married and moved to Knoxville, where Bill had agreed, at his father's urging, to work "for a couple of years" managing his family's small chain of gas stations. In the early years, Bill spent long days driving all over the country identifying, negotiating and purchasing good locations for new truck-stops. While lots of politicians talk about creating jobs—Bill Haslam has actually done it. When he first went to work for the company, Pilot Corporation had 800 employees; and when he left had more than 14,000 employees in 39 states. Throughout his time at Pilot, Bill sustained the company's growth by allocating resources wisely, managing the business conservatively, working hard to increase sales and satisfy customers. It was here that Bill gained the essential hands-on knowledge that makes the chief executive officer of a complicated enterprise successful.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/07/11/latest-lawsuit-against-pilot-flying-j-contends-haslam-devised-customer-fraud-scheme/?ocid=Yahoo&partner=ya5nbcs (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/07/11/latest-lawsuit-against-pilot-flying-j-contends-haslam-devised-customer-fraud-scheme/?ocid=Yahoo&partner=ya5nbcs)

Quote
The lawsuits against Pilot Flying J keep piling up, all of them filed by customers who apparently aren’t reacting as intended to the company’s vow to make things right.

The latest suit claims that Browns owner Jimmy Haslam was the one who made things wrong.  According to the Tennessean, the suit filed Thursday by Wright Transportation of Mobile, Alabama contends Haslam devised the “nationwide scheme to defraud and cheat” customers.

The new lawsuit also contends that Haslam gave his “blessing” to the scam.

It’s unclear whether the plaintiff has evidence beyond information made public via the federal criminal investigation of the company.  The 120-page affidavit supporting the warrant that permitted the search of the company’s headquarters claims that one management-level employee told a confidential informant that Haslam was aware of the scam.  One of the five executives who have pleaded guilty to federal charges said in his plea deal that “senior management” knew about the fraudulent practices.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/9458428/jimmy-haslam-says-no-plans-sell-cleveland-browns (http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/9458428/jimmy-haslam-says-no-plans-sell-cleveland-browns)

Quote
Haslam and his brother, Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam, announced last week that they are selling their minor league baseball team, the Tennessee Smokies. Randy Boyd, the CEO of Knoxville-based Radio Systems Corporation and a top education adviser to Gov. Haslam, is buying the Chicago Cubs' Double-A Southern League affiliate.

Chicago, eh? Is that part of their "restitution" to the Chicago gang for getting caught scamming people?

The world of the rich and powerful is a really small community! Everywhere you turn, somebody is connected to somebody with connections.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 12, 2013, 06:53:40 am
^^ Good catches on this! Something like this would have never crossed my mind.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on July 13, 2013, 08:32:48 pm
wow, they usualy send the Police when there is a Bible study in someones home. Especially in Arizona.

In all fairness to us Arizonans, that's not true.

The truth is that there was I think two cases of bible studies that were stopped by authorities. One was in Gilbert, just a few miles away from me, which is the explanation all on it's own; Gilbert plays hardball.

In both cases, the people were in fact in violation and they knew it. They were just trying to skirt zoning laws by claiming a bible study of a few friends. The one place had gone so far as to build a big building on their property for their "studies". Bull, it was a church building and they knew it. Not to mention the traffic issues, in a residential neighborhood.

If you wade through the claims of being persecuted, one usually sees it's not what it appears.

Almost always, it's a group of church-goers that have decided to run their own church out of their house. THAT I don't agree with, especially since all that I've heard of were typical churchianity products, trying to pull a fast one.

I believe in gathering, yes, but not in the form those people are trying. They are doing it no different than the churches, just in a smaller location, and usually it means those people are no longer going to, and financially supporting, some church business. That will make some people in the church business rather upset. They want people in their buildings, not in private homes, because where the people are, is where the tithes are!

We know the world will whine about Christians. Count on it, and just learn to ignore it. God will answer their complaining soon enough.

Arizona Pastor Arrested, Jailed for Holding Bible Study in Home

Bible study leader Michael Salman is sitting in jail today after his home was raided earlier this week by more than a dozen Phoenix, Ariz. police officers and city officials. His offense? The city says people aren’t allowed to hold private Bible studies on their own property.

Salman was sentenced to 60 days in jail, three years probation and received a $12,180 fine for “the crime.”

His wife Suzanne spoke with Fox and Friends this morning to express her shock and disbelief at the entire situation. According to Suzanne, the city told her that her husband was essentially arrested because the Bible study was at a private house .. and that essentially, it’s a church. Since they weren’t zoned for church, they were told they were breaking the rules.

“It defies logic, honestly. I don’t understand … that something so small got so large like this,” Suzanne said. “People do it all over the United States all the time.”

John Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute believes the family is being discriminated against because of their faith. “The key is — the Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of religion … the right to assemble and talk to each other wherever you want to be – in public or in your home,” he said. “The thing that I think is so shocking is that you might expect this in Iran or [some place] around the world … but happening in the United States, this is so shocking it’s beyond belief.”

Phoenix City Prosecutor Vicki Hill said in a statement: “It came down to zoning and proper permitting. Anytime you are holding a gathering of people continuously as he does, we have concerns about people being able to exit the facility properly in case there is a fire, and that’s really all this comes down to.”

What do you make of this case? As Suzanne says in the below interview, is this different than a regularly meeting Tupperware group or the like? And if so, how and why?

video: http://info.themicroeffect.com/2013/06/27/arizona-pastor-arrested-jailed-for-holding-bible-study-in-home/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on July 14, 2013, 02:41:16 am
What did I say?

Quote
Almost always, it's a group of church-goers that have decided to run their own church out of their house. THAT I don't agree with...

Like the news video report says, the guy has a pulpit and chairs in a building behind his house. HELLO! he's running an illegal "church" according to Caesar, and I agree.

Another fake churchianity type trying to scam the system. This is so not news. ::)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on August 02, 2013, 05:49:13 am
School Defends Textbook Calling Muhammad “God’s Messenger”

School officials in Florida are defending a textbook that declares Muhammad as the “Messenger of God” after critics accused an Islamic education group of launching a stealth jihad in American public school classrooms.

The Prentice World History textbook being used in Brevard Public Schools includes a 36-page chapter on Islam but no chapters on Christianity or Judaism.
 
According to a copy obtained by Fox News, The ninth grade textbook declares that Muhammad is the “Messenger of God” and instructs students that jihad is a duty that Muslims must follow.
 
“Jihad may be interpreted as a holy war to defend Islam and the Muslim community, much like the Crusades to defend Christianity,” the book states.
 
The textbook published large passages from the Koran, but failed to include any Scripture from the Bible. And while the book  makes declarations about Muhammad being God’s messenger, it does not make declarations about Jesus being God’s son.
 
“Some believed he was the messiah,” the textbook noted in an entry about Jesus. The book noted that He was later executed, but failed to mention His resurrection.
 
Brevard Public Schools defended the textbook and said it provided a balanced view of world religions.
 
“An analysis of one textbook cannot provide a balanced understanding as to what the students in Brevard Public Schools are learning throughout their academic careers,” spokeswoman Michelle Irwin said in a statement.

She said the Prentice Hall World History textbook incorporated a review of the origin of Christianity and Judaism – subjects covered indepth in sixth grade classrooms.
 
She also pointed out the book was among those approved by the state of Florida and that parents as well as community members were given the opportunity to review the textbook before it was adopted.
 
The book has been used in the classroom for the past three years without any complaints – until now.
 
Susan Aspey, a spokeswoman for the book’s publisher, told Fox News the textbook is balanced.
 
“Pearson and its authors adhere to the highest editorial standards when creating course materials, which undergo a rigorous review process,” she said. “A review of the book shows there is balanced attention given to the beliefs of Islam, Judaism and Christianity.
 
William Saxton, the chairman of Citizens For National Security, testified before the Brevard, Fla. School Board, warning them that the book rewrites Islamic history and presents a biased and incorrect version of the Muslim faith.
 
“They promote Islam at the expense of Christianity and Judaism,” Saxton told Fox News. “It blew my mind to see the kind of propaganda, the pro-Islam information that’s in this book – at the expense of Christianity and Judaism.”
 
Saxton said he believes the inclusion is deliberate and he placed the blame an organization that was once called Council on Islamic Education. The group works with education officials and publishers to produce chapters on Islam for American textbooks.
 
But today, the Council on Islamic Education is known as the Institute on Religious and Civic Values. It’s founder, Shabbir Mansuri, is listed as an academic reviewer on the textbook used in Brevard County.
 
In 2001 the OC Weekly newspaper in California interviewed Mansuri about comments former Second Lady Lynne Cheney made lamenting the amount of time schools were spending teaching cultures that were not American. Mansuri took her comments as a personal attack.
 

“For the past 11 years, Mansuri has waged what he calls a ‘bloodless’ revolution: promoting an increased emphasis on world cultures and faiths – including Islam – inside American junior high and high school campuses,” the newspaper reported.
 
Saxton said he is highly suspicious of Mansuri’s organization and questioned why they changed their name.
 
“These people are dedicated to getting this language into the textbooks,” he said, noting their new name is “benign and does not sound “threatening or Islamic. “But the same people are running it.”
 
Saxton said they are hearing from concerned parents across the country – and the complaints have generally been the same: public school textbooks that favor Islam over other world religions.
 
“It’s a form of stealth jihad,” he said. “(Jihad) is not just blowing up buildings. It’s more subtle. I began to understand that one of the ways the bad guys are trying to threaten our way of life is through our children. The Islamists want to get to the hearts and minds of our kids.”
 
Saxton’s all-volunteer organization launched a nationwide study in 2009 to root out what they believed to be Islamic bias in American school textbooks. He said they found as many as 80 textbooks that overtly promoted Islam.
 
Last year, the Citizens For National Security was able to get a similar book removed from the classroom in Palm Beach County.
 
“In short, you are using an Islam-biased, flawed textbook that has neither partially nor fully been corrected,” he told Brevard County school leaders.
 
A spokesman for IRCV told Fox News they would agree to an interview but never returned repeated calls.
 
In 2009 Mansuri found himself facing similar accusations of promoting and glorifying Islam – accusations he strongly denied in an Orange County Register interview.
 
“IRCV is recognized within the education community for our expertise in teaching about world religions,” he told the newspaper. “This expertise stands from our long-standing interest in religious liberty, religious pluralism and the practice of faith within a civic social framework.”
 
He blamed the criticism on “children of 9-11,” who were miseducated, the newspaper reported.
 
Saxton said the Prentice Hall textbook is riddled with errors. He especially took issue with their definition of jihad. The book called it a personal duty for Muslims and a way to defend their faith.
 
“Violent Islamic groups have used jihad for centuries,” he said. “The 9-11 attacks were an example of jihad as terrorism, not self-defense. Declarations of jihad have been made for purposes of violence against Christians, Jews, Americans, British and fellow Muslims hundreds of times.”
 
The textbook also alleges that “Muslims consider Jews and Christians to be ‘People of the Book.’”
 
Saxton said in practice, Jews and Christians have been subjected historically to violence and murder by Muslims.
 
“Christians and Jews are permitted very few of the rights and freedoms that the Muslim majority is allowed,” he said.
 
The textbook said under Islamic law women are spiritually equal, although they may have different roles and rights.
 
“This content is confusing at best and intellectually dishonest at worst,” he said. In Egypt and other Arab countries, women may not be employed in the private sector because they belong in the home. Women are stoned to death under Sharia law in Iran for adultery.”
 
School Board member Amy Kneessy told Fox News she had a chance to read the textbook and she was especially troubled by the section about how Muslims treat women.
 
“I was really disheartened,” she said. “To see such a blatant misportrayal of how women are treated in Muslim countries, I found disconcerting.”
 
Kneessy said there seems to be a double-standard and found evidence of bias in a number of passages – especially when it came to religious wars.
 
“When wars were involving Jewish people or Christians, some very hard adjectives were used – like ‘massacre,’” she said. “Whereas when it was a Muslim group, it was ‘occupy’ or a very innocuous term.”
 
She said the school has an obligation to be fair and balanced when teaching history.
 
“War is never clean and tidy,” she said. “Wars are bloody. People die and bad things happen. The facts need to be reported fairly from all perspectives.”
 
Kneessy said she plans on asking the entire school board to reevaluate the textbook.
 
“I am concerned it is more ammunition that continues to water down what this country was founded on,” she said. “This country was founded with Christian values. God was very much a part of our government. When you take the religious context out of it, then you take away the very heart of what this country was founded on.”

http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/school-defends-textbook-calling-muhammad-gods-messenger.html


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 02, 2013, 08:05:02 am
School Defends Textbook Calling Muhammad “God’s Messenger”


Yet another way the Illuminati is indoctrinating the youth to accept violence as normal(other ways being violence in entertainment).


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on August 07, 2013, 01:39:28 pm
Obama’s Congress Opens With Muslim Imam’s Prayer To Allah


 One nation under Allah
 
On July 31, 2013, Imam Talib Shareef of Masjid Muhammad in Washington, D.C., opened a session of the United States Congress with a prayer on Capitol Hill. This is the America that Obama has been working so hard to create.

video: http://vimeo.com/71847226

http://lynleahz.com/2013/08/06/obamas-congress-opens-with-muslim-imams-prayer-to-allah/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 07, 2013, 03:11:18 pm
And House Speaker Boehner called him a "guest chaplin"? ::)

With that being said - hate to say it, but this Muslim cleric's prayer is pretty much the same model of prayer you hear in Churchianity circles. Seriously, I couldn't believe how I've heard this similar prayer many times in my neck of the woods.

Ecc 5:2  Be not rash with thy mouth, and let not thine heart be hasty to utter any thing before God: for God is in heaven, and thou upon earth: therefore let thy words be few.

Matthew 6:7  But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on August 07, 2013, 04:29:24 pm
"How sweet are thy words unto my taste! [yea, sweeter] than honey to my mouth!" Psalm 119:103 (KJB)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 11, 2013, 01:10:55 pm
http://news.yahoo.com/cair-tries-ban-professor-speech-islamic-threat-america-141605667.html
CAIR tries to ban professor’s speech on ‘The Islamic Threat to America’
8/11/13

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) continues its epic struggle to understand the First Amendment.

In the latest incident, the Muslim civil liberties group has asked government officials in Brevard County, Florida to deny the use of a county-owned meeting room to a group CAIR has tagged as “an anti-Muslim hate group,” reports the Orlando Sentinel.

The group CAIR opposes is the local chapter of ACT! for America, an organization that stands particularly athwart the threat posed by radical Islam.

ACT! for America wants to use a committee room in the tiny coastal town of Viera to host a speech by Jonathan Matusitz, a tenured communications professor at the University of Central Florida down the road in Orlando.

Matusitz is slated to speak on Tuesday at a session called “The Islamic Threat to America.”

CAIR thinks the government should prohibit the UCF professor’s speech.

“It creates the perception of endorsement and approval by the Brevard County government of this group’s hateful views,” Ibrahim Hooper, CAIR’s communications director, told the Sentinel.

Hassan Shibly, a lawyer and executive director of CAIR of Tampa, said he is normally in favor of free speech.

“But this individual makes statements to incite violence against the Muslim community, so I think that the line has been crossed,” Shibly said of the professor at a major American research university. “ACT! is an extremist group no different than the KKK. And if the KKK wanted to use that room, there would be a protest.”

Brevard commission Chairman Andy Anderson pointed out that the county-owned meeting room is located in a public building which is taxpayer-funded and open to any group.

“It would be like a group renting out a room at the library to hold a meeting,” Anderson told the Sentinel. “The room is owned by the people and is open to anyone who wants to use it. Unless there was a reason for us to stop a group from using it because of some kind of issue that would be outside the protection of the First Amendment.

CAIR has targeted Matusitz before. In June, the group criticized him for teaching what it called anti-Muslim bigotry. CAIR officials charged that Matusitz propounded “Islamaphobic” views in front of students in a YouTube video.

A YouTube search using the term “Jonathan Matusitz” turns up a slew of videos. It seems reasonably safe to say CAIR could talking about the one uploaded about a month ago by CAIRtv — called “University of Central Florida Professor Spews Anti-Islam Hate.”

Officials at UCF indicated that the public school would not punish the tenured professor or review his activities.

“Dr. Matusitz is expressing his opinion, which is his right,” UCF spokesman Grant Heston told the Sentinel. “He is not speaking on behalf of the university, and we do not endorse his views.”

UCF also notes that the video in question was not taped during a UCF class.

In the video, the Sentinel says, Matusitz analyzes the link between Islamic culture and terrorism.

“Why do so many Muslims, relative to other religions, want to kill us?” he reportedly asks. “The answer is easy, very easy. It is seven letters: culture.”

According to his faculty webpage, Matusitz has a doctorate from the University of Oklahoma. He claims 95 academic publications and more than 100 conference presentations. Also, in 2010, he taught at a NATO-affiliated military base in Belgium.

He lists “globalization of terrorism” and “globalization of cyberterrorism” among his research interests.

At the website Rate My Professors, Matusitz gets generally stellar ratings from students (a 3.7 overall out a possible 4.0).

“This man is extremely informed and cuts straight to the heart of many problems,” praised one student.”One of those few people, who if you bring an effort with you, you will gain so much. He should be advising the President.”

“He’s always available by email and never forgets a name or face,” observes another student. “Seriously, it’s crazy.”

The main complaints against Matusitz are that he can be arrogant, that “his accent is difficult to understand at times,” and that his courses are “hard, hard, hard.”



Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on August 12, 2013, 03:46:28 am
Quote
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) continues its epic struggle to understand the First Amendment.

No, that racist organization continues to ignore the Constitution, and instead promote terrorist causes, as well as try to ban or blackball any opposition to Islam.

Hypocrites. They keep saying things like this, trying to pull some bogus alliance with a government, when Islam has zero loyalty to any government that is not Islamic. THAT is a fact.

CAIR are the ones that are being racist.


Title: Million Muslim March On DC Set For 9/11/2013
Post by: Christian40 on August 13, 2013, 03:53:07 am
"First, let me start by saying that I am not trying to scare anyone and that I’m not asking anyone to think like me. But I am asking people to think. I have many friends in the military who are keeping me up to date on the UN forces that are amassing here in OUR Republic.

The “Million Muslim March” on DC, set for 9/11/2013, is when I expect “things to get out of control.” And this POTUS may try to take advantage of the situation (and by “executive order” begin Martial Law.)With the MASSIVE buildup of UN Forces added to the Islamic Jihad Terrorists already positioned in this country, I believe something may happen; and we better be prepared.

Obama knows we’re all on to him, and he’s being backed into a corner with all of these scandals surrounding him. So what better way to stir up trouble than to have his Muslim brothers amass in DC.? No doubt they’ll have some instigators stir something up. Karl Marx said that “The masses are too stupid and ignorant to understand how good communism will be for them, so they need to be forced down that path, by any and all means possible. Lie, deceive, create class and race warfare issues, and use catastrophes (and if there are none, make some up; the ends justify the means)” Lets face it: Obama wants to be king, and what better way to begin Martial Law than to have his Terrorist Brothers cause problems?

Islamic jihad terrorists are well positioned here and have been for quite a while. Of the world’s 1.9 billion claimed by Islamic leaders, there are an estimated 7-10 million Muslims in the U.S. That is up from 5 million estimated 10 years ago. I believe the 7-10 million is a low-ball figure. No one knows for sure because our Census laws do not allow us to ask about religious affiliation.

All Muslims say the same shahada – confession of faith – There is no God but Allah. Muhammad is Allah’s prophet. That sets the stage for taking over the world for Allah, the establishment of a worldwide caliphate with Shar’ia Law, forced conversion of all infidels – unbelievers in Islam, subjugation in dhimmi of those who will not convert, or elimination of those who have converted or not at the whim of some Islamist leader (starting with any who have left Islam, then in order moving on to Jews, Christians, and others.)

Obama has said there are 2000 mosques, Islamic societies, and such in the U.S. now, up from 1200 10 years ago. Obama should know due to the strong influences on him by Islamists and Marxists; his installing Islamist and Marxist operatives in his tyrannical, despotic, evil regime; and hosting hundreds of Islamist visitors at the White House for consultations with him. The Islamists include Valerie Jarrett – Obama’s closest advisor, born in Iran – and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s adviser Huma Abedin – who has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

You can search online and get maps of the locations of: 1) the mosques, etc., 2) Islamic jihad terrorist fundraising sites, and 3) Islamic jihad terrorist training sites in the U.S. The mosques, etc. and fundraising sites maps are near mirror images. The training sites are under Jamaat al-Fuqra.

A specific purpose of Jamaat al-Fuqra is to recruit and train domestic terrorists in the US. The two Pakistani brothers arrested in Ft. Lauderdale last year may well have been trained by Jamaat al-Fuqra. Naturalized US citizens, they were planning terrorist attacks in the US with WMDs, according to the FBI.

If people are even semi-conscious (and not deaf, blind, and dumb), they should remember the Ft. Hood Massacre, when US Army psychiatrist Major Nidal Hasan ran around screaming “Alahu akubar” and gunning down US soldiers, their family members, and other citizens. There were also two young, unarmed US Army recruits shot down in front of a Little Rock, Arkansas recruiting station in that time frame. Various other plots have been thwarted. One was for an attack with bombs and real assault rifles, machine guns, etc. on Ft. Dix, NJ. An alert citizen got law enforcement onto that plot. He was and still is a camera and photoshop owner who saw pictures the plotters brought in for processing at his business.

According to a recent report, Obama has requested that at least 15,000 Russian troops trained in disaster relief and “crowd functions” [i.e. riot control] be pre-positioned to respond to FEMA Region III during an unspecified “upcoming” disaster.

Also in the report, DHS head Janet Napolitano said these Russian troops would work “directly and jointly” with FEMA, whose mission in part is to secure the continuity of the US government in the event of natural disasters or war.

Important to note, this report says, is that FEMA Region III (the area Russian troops were requested for) includes Washington D.C. and the surrounding States of Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia."

http://www.westernjournalism.com/million-muslim-march-on-dc-set-for-9112013/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on August 13, 2013, 05:15:42 am
interesting, i didn not know of the planned rally. Kind of puts all those attack the white house movies in a little more perspective now doesnt it.

see http://endtimesandcurrentevents.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,8647.0.html





Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on August 13, 2013, 07:13:43 am
Jihadist Leader To U.S.: 'Islam Is Coming'

During a radio interview Sunday, a representative of al-Qaida in the Gaza Strip sent a message to the United States: “Islam is coming and there is no other choice.” That sentiment was expressed by Abu Saqer, leader of Jihadiya Salafiya in the Gaza Strip, speaking on “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” on New York’s WABC Radio. Jihadiya Salafiya represents al-Qaida in the Gaza Strip. Saqer further stated that after battling Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, the thousands of foreign  jihadists currently in Syria could turn their ire on what he called the many other “enemies of Islam,” including Israel and the United States. “Islam is coming and there is no other choice,” he told Klein about America and Europe. “Because we think Islam will come and this is something that no one can prevent,” he stated.   

http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/jihadist-leader-to-u-s-islam-is-coming/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 13, 2013, 11:11:47 am
Jihadist Leader To U.S.: 'Islam Is Coming'

During a radio interview Sunday, a representative of al-Qaida in the Gaza Strip sent a message to the United States: “Islam is coming and there is no other choice.” That sentiment was expressed by Abu Saqer, leader of Jihadiya Salafiya in the Gaza Strip, speaking on “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” on New York’s WABC Radio. Jihadiya Salafiya represents al-Qaida in the Gaza Strip. Saqer further stated that after battling Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, the thousands of foreign  jihadists currently in Syria could turn their ire on what he called the many other “enemies of Islam,” including Israel and the United States. “Islam is coming and there is no other choice,” he told Klein about America and Europe. “Because we think Islam will come and this is something that no one can prevent,” he stated.   

http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/jihadist-leader-to-u-s-islam-is-coming/

Islam is a big thread, I agree, but at the same time they seem to come off no different as the pro-gay lobby bullying crowd.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on August 13, 2013, 04:55:28 pm
Quote
“Because we think Islam will come and this is something that no one can prevent,” he stated.

You can think it all you want, but that won't make it happen, as I know for a fact Islam WILL get it's backside handed to them over a roasting fire!

"...every knee shall bow..."


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on August 15, 2013, 01:32:23 pm
Million Muslim March Planned in DC on Anniversary of 9-11

A group called The American Muslim Political Action Committee (AMPAC) is planning a one million Muslims march to Washington D.C. on September 11th. The timing of the group's march is seen by many as tasteless (to say the least) considering it is scheduled for the anniversary of the worst domestic massacre in American history perpetrated in the name of Islam. AMPAC ups the tasteless quotient by issuing "demands" for the American government:
 
We at AMPAC (American Political Action Committee) are planning an historic event for 9.11.13 where one million Muslims will march to Washington D.C. and demand that our civil rights be protected by our government.
 
We are demanding that laws be enacted protecting our 1st amendment . We are asking President Obama to fulfill his promise from his first campaign for Presidency of a transparent government. Lastly we are asking for the release of the 9/11 commission report to the American people.
 
The group seems to rationalize the date chosen for their march by claiming that the media has been lying to the American people with regard to the role Islam played in the 9/11 attacks:
 
On 9.11.01 our country was forever changed by the horrific events in New York. The entire country was victimized by the acts done on that day. Muslim and Non Muslim alike were traumatized but we as Muslims continue 12 years later to be victimized by being made the villains. To this day every media outlet and anti Islamic organization has committed slanderous and libel statements against us as Muslims and our religion of Islam.
 
Yet our Government either sits idly by and does nothing to protect our freedoms or it exacerbates the problem with its constant war on terrorism in Islamic countries, congressional hearings on Islam in America, and its changes to the NDAA law.
 
These lies told to the American population has made it impossible for us to do true Dawa. Why do we have to defend our religion while doing Dawa? Why can’t we just share the perfection of the Quran and the beauty of our beloved Prophet Muhammad (SWS)?

http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013/08/15/Million-Muslim-March-Planned-in-DC-on-Anniversary-of-9-11


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Christian40 on August 16, 2013, 03:03:51 am
This picture is not in Islamabad. This picture was taken in England, probably somewhat similar to what is in the US soon.

(http://s7.postimg.org/5x0y4b4ln/561322_698132320204299_336619048_n.jpg)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on August 16, 2013, 03:43:03 am
Uh, not even close! Maybe Sydney, but not the US. You obviously don't know Americans.

I have my strong suspicions that there is no way people in the US would tolerate that. Some rednecks here wouldn't tolerate it. And those soccer moms would never allow the streets to be blocked and prevent them from going to the mall.

Those heathen of Islam try that in the US, and you watch what happens!

Yeah, let them try that in South Central L.A., or down in "Little Havana", the Cuban district of Miami. And there is some people down in the bayous and deep south that I know wouldn't tolerate it.

The Islamic call to prayer would be fightin' words!


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on August 16, 2013, 06:47:31 am
‘Million Muslim March’ to Be Held on 9/11 Anniversary – and the Group Behind It Is Just as Radical as You’d Expect

A radical Muslim political advocacy group has sparked controversy with its plans to hold a “Million Muslim March” on Washington, D.C., on the 12th anniversary of the 9/11. The gathering is intended to condemn the discrimination of Muslims following 9/11 and urge the U.S. government to reveal the “truth” about the attack.
 
The move has been blasted as “tasteless” given the significance of the date commemorating the worst domestic terror attack in American history.
 
The group behind the event, the American Muslim Political Action Committee (AMPAC), is led by M.D. Rabbi Alam, a self-proclaimed 9/11 truther who believes that Jews are somehow behind the plot. AMPAC is radical enough that the Huffington Post even labeled it a “fringe group.”
 
Alam, who has reportedly associated with a radical Islamic cleric, is also a Missouri-based Democratic activist who chairs the National Democratic Party Asian American Caucus, the Washington Free Beacon reports. He ran — unsuccessfully — for Missouri’s secretary of state in 2012.

Protesters in Washington will reportedly denounce “illegal tapping and surveilling of Muslim Americans,” FBI “traps” and “media propaganda making the word terrorist synonymous with Muslim,” event organizer Isa Hodge told US News & World Report last month.
 
In a press release Hodge also alleged that the U.S. government “either sits idly by and does nothing to protect our freedoms or it exacerbates the problem with its constant war on terrorism in Islamic countries, congressional hearings on Islam in America, and its changes to the [National Defense Authorization Act].”
 
Further, demonstrators will apparently demand the “truth” about 9/11. Hodge argues that the full record of the 9/11 Commission Report has never been released.

Not even the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history, is willing to attend the event due to AMPAC’s radical beliefs about 9/11.
 
Despite promising to “bring USA together,” the event, unsurprisingly, has had a hard time gaining support. Other than a few truther groups and one Pennsylvania Tea Party organization, the march has been widely rejected, according to HuffPost.
 
A Facebook page for the so-called “Million Muslim March” showed less than 10 people attending before it was taken down.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/15/million-muslim-march-will-still-be-held-on-911-anniversary-and-the-group-behind-it-is-just-as-radical-as-youd-expect/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on August 16, 2013, 12:17:01 pm
Quote
The group behind the event, the American Muslim Political Action Committee (AMPAC), is led by M.D. Rabbi Alam, a self-proclaimed 9/11 truther who believes that Jews are somehow behind the plot. AMPAC is radical enough that the Huffington Post even labeled it a “fringe group.”

Well, there you go. It's rather obvious what this all about.

And I find it rather ironic the Huffington Post would call somebody "fringe"! ::)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 16, 2013, 12:28:07 pm
Well, there you go. It's rather obvious what this all about.

And I find it rather ironic the Huffington Post would call somebody "fringe"! ::)

Even the "truth" movement firmly believes the Jews were behind 9/11 - you see where all of this ties in? It's MANY groups who are developing this illogical line of thinking, pretty much the entire heathen world now.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on August 16, 2013, 01:35:06 pm
I call it "The Shotgun Method".

The idea is that you blast your propaganda everywhere, with the thinking that something is bound to stick, then they go back and focus on the spots that stuck and just grind on it with blasting the ideology in ads, planted discussions, tv, movies, anywhere a person's eye might look or ears hear.

Just like the tv news media does. They manage how society perceives things by intentionally presenting a certain mentality through their reporting on select stories.

A news channel can make a situation look like a massive disaster, only to have a people walk by in the background of a reporter in a John boat, in ankle deep water!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=8slEPV9LyS0


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Christian40 on August 17, 2013, 02:25:31 am
(http://bigredbigapple.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/mosque.jpg)

Remember this?

September 2010:

"This is an accurate picture of every Friday afternoon in several locations throughout NYC where there are mosques with a large number of Muslims that cannot fit into the mosque - They fill the surrounding streets, facing east for a couple of hours between about 2 & 4 p.m. – Besides this one at 42nd St & Madison Ave, there is another, even larger group, at 94th St & 3rd Ave, etc.,etc. – Also, I presume, you are aware of the dispute over building another “high rise” Mosque a few blocks from “ground zero” – With regard to that one, the “Imam” refuses to disclose where the $110 million dollars to build it is coming from and there is a lawsuit filed to force disclosure of that information – Just some facts FYI – But then, you have your own troubles with the “immigration” problem and the new AZ law – November can’t come soon enough 

This is in New York City on Madison  Avenue, not in France or the Middle East or Yemen.

Is there a message here?  Yes, there is, and they are claiming America for allah.  if we don’t wake up soon, we are going to “politically correct”ourselves right out of our own country!

Just think what would happen if Christians or Jews wanted to stop traffic in the street and pray."

http://bigredbigapple.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/mosque.jpg


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on August 17, 2013, 04:59:55 am
That's in New York!  ::)

That place isn't America. It's a melting pot of all kinds of nationalities that the people there have a completely different attitude. It's a globalist/international kind of mentality.

Go back and look again at what I actually said.

Nothing personal, but like I said, you don't know America.

Believe it or not, doesn't matter, there are still places here in the US that I wouldn't recommend foreigners go. Heck, I wouldn't recommend some Americans go there either.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 17, 2013, 12:44:43 pm
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-15/oklahoma-ban-on-applying-islamic-law-halted-by-u-s-court.html?cmpid=yhoo
8/15/13
Oklahoma Ban on Applying Islamic Law Halted by U.S. Court

Oklahoma’s voter-approved amendment to the state’s constitution to prevent its courts from considering international law or Islam’s Shariah law was permanently blocked by a U.S. judge.

The measure, which the judge said was approved by 70 percent of the state’s voters in November 2010, was found to violate the guarantee of religious freedom contained in the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.

“While the public has an interest in the will of the voters being carried out, the court finds that the public has a more profound and long-term interest in upholding an individual’s constitutional rights,” U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange in Oklahoma City said in her ruling yesterday.

The state failed to prove a compelling interest for the law, Miles-LaGrange said. She also rejected Oklahoma’s request to sever the offending portions of the amendment, concluding that without the Shariah provision, the measure might not have passed.

“The public debate, public discussions, articles, radio ads and robocalls” regarding the amendment “all primarily and overwhelmingly focused on the Shariah law provisions,” Miles-LaGrange said.

Two Days

The case was filed two days after the 2010 election by an Ann Arbor, Michigan-born Muslim, Muneer Awad, who served as executive director of the Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

A November 2010 court order preliminarily blocking certification of the election results was upheld last year by a Denver-based U.S. appeals court.

“This law unfairly singled out one faith and one faith only,” Ryan Kiesel, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma, said in a statement. “This amendment was nothing more than a solution in search of a problem.”

“We have received the order and, as always, we are in the process of carefully reviewing the judge’s decision,” state Attorney General E. Scott Pruitt said today in an e-mailed statement.

The case is Awad v. Ziriax, U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma (Oklahoma City).


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on August 19, 2013, 07:04:35 am
Muslim group under attack for planning 'Million Muslim March' set for Sept. 11 in Washington D.C.

Critics say a Muslim group picked the wrong day — Sept. 11 — to march on Washington to complain about religious profiling and President Obama’s handling of an investigation into the terror attacks that rocked America 12 years ago.

The mass demonstration, called the "Million Muslim March," was changed to a more mainstream-sounding event, "Million American March Against Fear," but the name did not seem to gain much traction and has apparently reverted back to its original title.

American Muslim Political Action Committee (AMPAC), which is organizing the march, claims Muslims nationwide have been the victims of anti-Islamic bigotry in the years following the Sept. 11, 2001, Al Qaeda terrorist attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people on American soil.

"On 9.11.01 our country was forever changed by the horrific events in New York. The entire country was victimized by the acts done on that day," the group said in a statement. "Muslim and Non Muslim alike were traumatized but we as Muslims continue 12 years later to be victimized by being made the villains. To this day every media outlet and anti Islamic organization has committed slanderous and libel statements against us as Muslims and our religion of Islam."

"Yet our Government either sits idly by and does nothing to protect our freedoms or it exacerbates the problem with its constant war on terrorism in Islamic countries, congressional hearings on Islam in America, and its changes to the NDAA law," the statement says.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/muslim_group_under_attack_sept_planning_dHGqCy9Ux69bSwItuFCgIK


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 23, 2013, 11:12:34 am
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/171200#.UheFk2wo5jo
Al Jazeera Faces Challenges Coming to America

The network which launched on Tuesday to 40 million U.S. homes, looks to climb the broadcasting ladder, promising un-biased news coverage.

8/23/13

The Qatar owned network, Al Jazeera, launched its first U.S. television news service this week, playing 14 hours a day of live news and servicing 40 million American households.

Al Jazeera America came to fruition after acquiring the network previously known as Current TV, from former U.S. Vice President Al Gore back in January 2013.

The news channel originally catered to the English speaking population online through Al Jazeera English, which started in November 1996. The channel previously struggled to attract U.S. audiences, due its association as anti-American, according to BBC news. 

CNN News also claims the network has “long tried to break into the U.S. market but had little luck getting American broadcasters to carry its channels.”

In 2010, the Al Jazeera English drew criticism for broadcasting Osama bin Laden videos in hostility towards the Bush administration.

Amidst the earlier controversy, Al Jazeera has not yet signed agreements with major television operators, such as Time Warner Cable, who dropped the channel as soon as it bought out Current TV.

Earlier this year, "The Daily Show" host, Jon Stewart, also knocked the arrangement, describing it as an "odd move" and grilled Al Gore on his decision to sell the network to a "fossil-fuel-based buyer."

Many media outlets have questioned the networks ability to draw an American audience, such as British news outlet, The Independent, who ran the headline, “Al Jazeera launches channel in US, but will anyone watch?”

Even though Al Jazeera faces challenges with viewers who associate it with anti-Americanism, the network promises to provide unbiased international new coverage and to focus on important stories to its American viewers.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on August 23, 2013, 04:03:06 pm
I won't be watching! I have ZERO interest in what a terrorist pr "news" service has to say.

Any American involved with that bunch needs to reconsider their place of residence! I hear the Qatari desert is nice this time of year! Maybe Al Gore can take his blood money on a vacation there, a LONG vacation, maybe even apply for citizenship. They seem to like sellouts, liars, and thieves in the Middle East.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on September 03, 2013, 05:21:05 am
Stoning is good for your soul, says Canadian cleric

Death to sinners. That is the religious message brought to you by YouTube. Homosexuals and adulterers, you’d better start running because it’s directed at you.

Don’t believe me? Well, plenty of people watched Wednesday as Sheikh Faisal Hamid Abdur-Razak put his death by stoning show on the digital high road courtesy of the Internet.

A YouTube video featuring an insightful look at the ideas of the Brampton, Ont., preacher who stated that “sinners,” as defined by his own interpretation of Islamic law, can benefit from a jolly good stoning was running all day until it was belatedly taken down.

The sheikh explained that a Muslim who is sentenced to death by stoning under Sharia law actually benefits from this gruesome punishment as her soul is being purified even as the stones rain down on her sinful head.

It would possibly be funny if it were in a Monty Python movie. Almost, but not quite. There is no joke to be had in a medieval form of punishment like stoning. Nor should it be condoned.

Alas, it might be more widely spread than most Canadians would believe.

In 2010 the Pew Research Centre in Washington published the results of an extensive poll of Middle East countries and tapped into their views of modern life.

According to the results, at least three-quarters of Muslims in Egypt and Pakistan say they would favour making each of the following the law in their countries: stoning people who commit adultery, whippings and cutting off of hands for crimes like theft and robbery and the death penalty for those who leave the Muslim religion.

Majorities of Muslims in Jordan and Nigeria also favor these harsh punishments. Thankfully none will be proscribed in Canada because we are a free, open and tolerant society that will never become a theocracy where common law is subjugated to religious dogma.

Being free, open and tolerant also means that people such as Sheikh Faisal Hamid Abdur-Razak can take advantage of free speech to spread their own version of moral purification.

This from a man who serves as both president of the Islamic Forum of Canada and vice-president of the Islamic Council of Imams of Canada. Attempts were made to contact the sheikh for comment for this article but they were unsuccessful.

Still, that doesn’t mean we have to withhold our own opinion.

We can surely ask just why a clearly inflammatory piece of speech like that delivered by the sheikh is hosted on the popular video-sharing site. It’s got company, too.

It doesn’t take long to find plenty of disgusting material on YouTube that makes it less of a social site than a sewer of hate and bloody gore, most of it carried out in the sacred name of religion.

There are endless images of gruesome hangings, stonings, executions, assaults, assassinations, shootings and so-called honour killings.

It says a lot about the warped values of YouTube that it will vigorously protect the copyright of Saturday Night Live when an illegal video of a skit from the show is posted but let vivid examples of man’s inhumanity to man be run in all its glory.

A quick YouTube search reveals an alarming number of terrorist training videos from al-Qaida side by side with executions by Al-Shabaab and hate-filled sermons from across the globe.

This is despite YouTube’s insufferably smug claims that it has “community guidelines” that prohibit “dangerous or illegal activities such as bomb-making, hate speech and incitement to commit violent acts” and only accepts “religious” films.

If you believe that, then you’ll also believe that a video snuff movie features people sneezing.

http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/canada/archives/2013/08/20130828-084745.html


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Christian40 on September 09, 2013, 05:15:05 am
(http://s11.postimg.org/b6swoqcub/1017009_212665385564592_1505629138_n.jpg)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on September 09, 2013, 06:11:47 am
(http://s11.postimg.org/b6swoqcub/1017009_212665385564592_1505629138_n.jpg)

ive read they were denied a permit.  ??? but allow the Muslims to march and praise Obama



Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on September 09, 2013, 06:50:05 am


Permit Denied to 2 Million Bikers to DC on 9.11.13
Posted by Eilana Caswell - Nat. Secretary on September 6, 2013 at 5:22pm in Sample Title
View Discussions
 .




from their facebook page:
 

FINAL DETAILS FROM THE NATIONAL "2 MILLION BIKERS TO DC" TEAM:

Washington DC has DENIED our permit for a no-stop ride through Washington DC. We find this regretful for the residents and businesses of that great city, and humbly offer our apologies. What could have been a one or two hour ride through will now likely be an all day event. We will be obeying all laws. We will be stopping at all stoplights, stop signs, and yielding to all pedestrians.

RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES OF WASHINGTON DC: On behalf of the National "2 Million Bikers to DC" Team, please accept our sincere apologies. We did the right thing and went through the proper channels to secure a no-stop permit to ride through your great city. We wanted to ride an established route, which would have taken us past the Viet Nam Memorial to the Lincoln Memorial, across the bridge into Virginia, and that's it! We would have been completely out of Washington DC, and your city would have been back to normal.

The National Team fully expected our permit to be rejected, and have already drafted a Plan-B. That Plan-B will be posted a little later today once the final details have been bolted down.

We know that California and Texas riders had kicks stands up yesterday. Many other western states have kickstand up today and throughout the weekend.

RIDERS: You are true, blue Patriots and we salute you for your participation in this event! Many of you have taken time off of work to be here. You have freely given of your time, your funds, and your bikes to ride shoulder to shoulder in this event. You have have left your families and your jobs to be here. Those of us who ride come from different clubs, chapters, and organizations. Some of us ride with family and friends and some ride alone. But on September 11th, we ride as one!! We ride to pay tribute and offer respect to those that lost their lives on that day 12 years ago, and to salute our troops engaged in the War on Terror. Riders!...we are the best of the best in America!! Our love for these people and this country is staggering, and we will make a display of Patriotism and solidarity America won't soon forget!!

Riders!...we lift you up to the Lord and pray that His hand and divine protection will ride with you all.

Rubber side down, brothers! See you Wednesday morning!!

http://americanlibertyriders.ning.com/forum/topics/permit-denied-to-2-million-bikers-to-dc-on-9-11-13
 :D


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on September 09, 2013, 03:44:11 pm
Who says they needed a permit in the first place? They don't need no stinkin' permit! They can freely ride where ever they choose. It's their country!

I hope 4 million bikers show up, park on the White House lawn and demand answers.

I thank God I'm born-again and know the truth of what's really going on in this wicked corrupt world, because if I didn't, I'd be loosing my mind about now.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Christian40 on September 10, 2013, 04:53:22 am
Who says they needed a permit in the first place? They don't need no stinkin' permit! They can freely ride where ever they choose. It's their country!

I hope 4 million bikers show up, park on the White House lawn and demand answers.

I thank God I'm born-again and know the truth of what's really going on in this wicked corrupt world, because if I didn't, I'd be loosing my mind about now.

i know how you feel brother!

Patriots versus Shariah Muslims in Washington DC!! Patriots will win!


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on September 12, 2013, 04:03:49 am
Well, there you go! A "few dozen" Muslims showed up!  ::)

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/bikers-ride-through-d-c--to-honor-9-11-victims-160359060.html (http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/bikers-ride-through-d-c--to-honor-9-11-victims-160359060.html)

Quote
Bikers ride through D.C. to honor 9/11 victims

Mike Krumboltz, Yahoo! News 16 hours ago The Sideshow

Look out, D.C. Your streets are going to be crowded on Wednesday.

To honor the 12th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, thousands of motorcyclists are riding through the streets of the nation's capital.

The group, which calls itself the "2 Million Bikers to D.C.," had applied for a permit but was denied by the National Park Service and the Metro Police, according to WTOP.com.

The bikers decided to come to D.C. anyway, which is perfectly legal. Ted Gest, spokesperson for the D.C. attorney general's office, told U.S. News, "It's not a crime to parade" through the district without a permit.

Already, pictures are showing up on Twitter and Facebook.

There is some speculation about the rally's motives. According to the Washington Times, the rally was originally intended as a response to the American Muslim Political Action Committee's Million Muslim March, also planned for Wednesday.

However, the 2 Million Bikers to D.C.'s Facebook page paints a different picture. There, the group insists the event is peaceful and is intended to respect for victims of 9/11 as well as those in the armed forces.

The bikers' Facebook page also writes this:

    WE STAND AGAINST ANY "FUNDAMENTAL TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICA" BY THIS ADMINISTRATION OR ANY PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION!

The Million Muslim March's official site explains that its gathering is a march "against fear."

Via its official site:

    We ask all individuals and organizations working for peace to attend this collective action to tell our Government leaders we want transparency and policies of peace.

According to the Washington Times, the few dozen participants in the Million Muslim March were outnumbered by a Christian group protesting the rally.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on September 22, 2013, 02:43:41 pm
Muslims: We want schools closed on our holidays
Asking for equal time with Christian, Jewish students


Muslims in Montgomery County, Md., are petitioning local school officials to add two Islamic holidays that vary from year to year to the school calendar, and if needed, to shorten the “winter break” to make up for the days off.

“There is no need for any MCPS students to miss classroom instruction time if schools were to close for Eid holidays,” their petition argues. “There is a state law that mandates at least 180 classroom instruction days per year. That won’t change. If schools were to close on Eid holidays the missed days could easily be made up by slightly shortening the lengthy winter or summer breaks.

“Alternatively any of the many pre-existing school closings could be moved to coincide with Eid holidays,” the petition argues.

The Muslims want schools to close on Islamic holidays because they observe the Christian holidays of Easter and Christmas, and the Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashanah. The dates of Muslim holidays vary because they are based on the Islamic calendar.

The Muslims argue that the county schools already close on “Christmas, Good Friday, Easter Monday, Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur and Passover.”

The school calendar, however, notes that Yom Kippur is on a Saturday, and Passover is not mentioned.

Nevertheless, they want recognition of Eid al-Fitr, to mark the end of Ramadan, and Eid al-Adha, marking a pilgrimage to Mecca.

“Currently the thousands of Muslim MCPS staff and students have to choose between their education and observing their religious practices,” the coalition argues. “This is not a choice that our Christian and Jewish neighbors face on their holidays.”

According to a report in the local Gazette, the sponsor of the move is the Maryland chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR.

The Muslim coalition said other school districts that acknowledge their holidays include Burlington, Vt.; Cambridge, Mass.; Dearborn, Mich.; Skokie, Ill.; and Paterson and Trenton, N.J.

The chief operating officer of the district, Larry Bowers, however, points out that state law now allows districts to close only for secular purposes, reports Pamela Geller in her Atlas Shrugs blog.

The report noted the system already recognizes both Muslim holidays by declaring them non-testing days and giving Muslim students excused absences.

“Hamas-CAIR,” Geller commented, “is on the Islamic supremacist march in Maryland.”

“Latest front is the Montgomery County public schools,” she wrote. “They want them closed on Muslim holidays (does that include 9/11)? Of course, they frame this as a civil rights issue. 9/11 is a civil rights issue. I expect Zawahiri to frame Islam’s war on the West as a civil rights issue as well. There is nothing civil about the exploitation of the civil rights issue.

“I couldn’t help but chuckle at the name of the group, ‘Equality for Eid Coalition.’ Considering that there is no equality under the Shariah, it is particularly contemptible. Under the Shariah, non-Muslims are denied basic human rights and forced to live as sub-humans or dhimmis,” she said.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/muslims-we-want-schools-closed-on-our-holidays/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Christian40 on September 26, 2013, 09:22:15 pm
MOSCOW -- Russia's top Islamic cleric has protested a provincial court order to declare a translation of the Quran as extremist and to destroy it.

"Ravil Gainutdin, the head of the Council of Muftis of Russia, said in an open letter to President Vladimir Putin released Monday that the ruling was "illiterate" and "provocative."

The Quran is available in Russian translation, but the court last week ruled that the translation by Elmir Kuliyev published in Saudi Arabia in 2002 violated federal law banning extremist materials.

Gainutdin said that the "Russian Muslims were appalled by the neglect of law shown by the court" in the Black Sea port of Novorossiisk and demanded that the verdict be revoked. He said the court's order to destroy the Muslim holy book was particularly outrageous."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/23/quran-banned-russia_n_3976856.html?utm_hp_ref=religion


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Christian40 on September 29, 2013, 05:33:16 am
Ohio Mom Gets Islamic Proselytizing Video Removed from 7th Grade History Class

"The Olmsted Falls City School District, located in Olmsted Falls, Ohio has agreed to remove the video “30 Days: Muslim and America” from the 7th grade World History Curriculum. The action was taken to avoid a constitutional challenge by the Thomas More Law Center TMLC, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, which filed a series of requests for public records concerning the video on behalf of Jenny McKeigue, a mother of three children who attend schools within the district.

McKeigue first became concerned about the history curriculum in 2011 when her son, then in 7th grade, was required to memorize the 5 Pillars of Islam (the requirement was later discontinued).   After a deeper look into the 7th grade history curriculum, McKeigue became concerned about the content of the “Muslims and America” video to which the school had exposed her son.   She asked the School District to remove the video from the curriculum and replace it with an objective video relevant to the history of Islam, not one that taught children how to become a Muslim. Her request was denied.  Subsequently, Mrs. McKeigue began the escalation process to the Superintendent and the School Board

After over a year and a half of denied requests for information, including requests for the class syllabus, from the School District, McKeigue reached out to the Thomas More Law Center for assistance. TMLC agreed to help.  Ohio attorney Michael S. Goldstein acted as an affiliated local counsel.

The questionable video features a Christian (Dave) agreeing to embrace the religion of Islam and the Muslim culture by living with a Muslim family for 30 days in Dearborn, Michigan.  Dave was required to live, dress and eat as a Muslim, study the Koran daily and participate in Muslim prayer. The video features several instances of Muslim prayer and even a look at a “how to pray in Islam” sheet complete with Dave practicing how to pray and reciting lines such as “I testify that there is no God other than the Almighty” and “I testify that Mohammad is the messenger of God.”

The video is also set up in a manner that portrays non-Muslims as uneducated bigots and Muslims as persecuted victims. At one point in the video, 7th grade students are told that if they hear someone say something wrong about Islam, it is their responsibility to fix it.

The video was being used as a part of the Ohio 7th Grade Social Studies Standards Expectations for Learning which requires students to “describe achievements by the Islamic civilization and how these achievements were introduced into Western Europe in the time period between 750 BC – 1600AD.” As such, “Muslims and America” is clearly irrelevant to Ohio Social Studies Standards.

Mrs. McKeigue felt the video, in addition to being irrelevant, also violated several Board Policies with regard to the promotion of religion in the classroom and the fair representation of all ethnic and religious groups. Additionally, she questioned the accuracy of the video as well as the applied double standard as no other video was shown nor instruction given demonstrating how to perform the religious exercises of other religions.

In response to McKeigue’s criticism, the school district invited Olmsted Falls pastors to review the video.  To the school district’s chagrin, several pastors agreed with McKeigue and also questioned the accuracy of the video.  Dr. Todd Hoadley, school superintendent at the time, disregarded their concerns.  At a March 2013 Board meeting, and in private conversations, he defended the video with the astonishing argument that the inaccuracies of the video proved its value.

Richard Thompson. President and Chief Counsel of the TMLC commented: “Teachers may not constitutionally show video tapes that violate the neutrality they must maintain toward religion or that engages in religious instruction. Showing “Muslims and America” violated those principles and the Establishment Clause of our Constitution.  Under the guise of teaching the history of Islam to seventh graders, history teachers were proselytizing students to the Islamic faith.  Although I applaud the school district for resolving this issue without litigation, I was disappointed to discover internal communications from one history teacher ridiculing and disparaging Mrs. McKeigue, and even suggesting she should be fired from her part time job as alumni director for the school because of her criticism of the video.”

Thompson continued, “Teachers may provide instruction about a particular religion, but they are not constitutionally permitted to provide religious instruction. The education of our children is too important to be left to teachers and school administrators alone.   Parents have a duty to be personally involved as well.  Mrs. McKeigue was exercising her constitutional right to free speech in fulfilling her crucial duty and responsibility as a parent.”

How did this dawah get into the classroom to begin with?"

http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2013/09/27/ohio-mom-gets-islamic-proselytizing-video-removed-from-7th-grade-history-class/




Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on September 29, 2013, 05:57:12 am
Quote
The video was being used as a part of the Ohio 7th Grade Social Studies Standards Expectations for Learning which requires students to “describe achievements by the Islamic civilization and how these achievements were introduced into Western Europe in the time period between 750 BC – 1600AD.”

Okay class, what intentional historical misrepresentation has been made in the above statement?  ::)

Islam did not exist until the early 600's AD!


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on September 29, 2013, 06:50:20 am
Okay class, what intentional historical misrepresentation has been made in the above statement?  ::)

Islam did not exist until the early 600's AD!

quite correct, but the thing about Islam is, they never tell the truth and constantly retcon history


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Christian40 on October 18, 2013, 05:02:26 am
(http://s22.postimg.org/9r6xjprgx/1384331_10200751227045768_409680315_n.jpg)

"The new world-wide Plant-a-Pig movement : In Seville Spain, local people found a way to stop the construction of another mosque in their town. They buried a pig on the site, and made sure this would be known to the local press. Islamic rules forbid the erecting of a Mosque on "pig soiled ground. The Muslims had to cancel the project. No protests were needed by the local people, and... it worked! Plant a pig In Texas they have an overabundance of feral pigs. They could ship them all over the country, and plant them everywhere they're needed! Americans, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work solving the problem of this spreading menace to our American way of life. If pigs are the answer, let’s do it! Besides, it would be a "stimulus package" for the Texas economy. Let’s keep this going! Send it on! Maybe we could get someone to even plant a pig at the White House Just thinking."


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on October 18, 2013, 06:33:35 am
(http://s22.postimg.org/9r6xjprgx/1384331_10200751227045768_409680315_n.jpg)

"The new world-wide Plant-a-Pig movement : In Seville Spain, local people found a way to stop the construction of another mosque in their town. They buried a pig on the site, and made sure this would be known to the local press. Islamic rules forbid the erecting of a Mosque on "pig soiled ground. The Muslims had to cancel the project. No protests were needed by the local people, and... it worked! Plant a pig In Texas they have an overabundance of feral pigs. They could ship them all over the country, and plant them everywhere they're needed! Americans, let's roll up our sleeves and get to work solving the problem of this spreading menace to our American way of life. If pigs are the answer, let’s do it! Besides, it would be a "stimulus package" for the Texas economy. Let’s keep this going! Send it on! Maybe we could get someone to even plant a pig at the White House Just thinking."

 :D that is so funny and reminds me of another piggy story. Where the IAF dropped pig bodies onto a Saudi Airfield. Also i believe Russia was burying dead muslim terrorists with the bodies of dead pigs.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on October 18, 2013, 12:46:11 pm
Not sure about funny, but definitely creative!

And we got plenty of wild pigs to use.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Christian40 on October 26, 2013, 04:54:58 am
(http://s15.postimg.org/jh1o7yj1n/524429_10151958939335049_351111976_n.jpg)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on October 27, 2013, 03:36:54 am
That's a rather inflammatory, prejudice image.

Who says "Muslims are SUBSIDIZED and they are also exempted from mandated insurance"?


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on October 27, 2013, 05:21:43 am
That's a rather inflammatory, prejudice image.

Who says "Muslims are SUBSIDIZED and they are also exempted from mandated insurance"?

Quote
Muslims don't have to participate in Obamacare due to "religious exemptions" not extended to Christians!  Need evidence?  Here you go:
 

EXEMPTIONS FROM INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.
 
—In the case of an individual who is seeking an exemption certificate under section 1311(d)(4)(H) from any requirement or penalty imposed by section 5000A, the following information:
 
In the case of an individual seeking exemption based on the individual’s status as a
member of an exempt religious sect or division, as a member of a health care sharing ministry, as an Indian,
or as an individual eligible for a hardship exemption, such information as the Secretary shall prescribe.”
 
Senate Bill, H.R. 3590, pages 273-274
 
Now what's curious about this tidy little insertion is that it's primarily designed for religious groups such as the Amish.  But add a wrinkle here -- for Muslims, modern health care systems are a bit more akin to "gambling" -- which is haram or forbidden in Islam.  Liberty and Pride explains:
 

There are several reasons why an individual could claim exemption, being a member of a religion that does not believe in insurance is one of them. Islam is one of those religions. Muslims believe that health insurance is “haraam”, or forbidden; because they liken the ambiguity and probability of insurance to gambling.  This belief excludes them from any of the requirements, mandates, or penalties set forth in the bill.  Other excluded groups include Amish, American Indians, and Christian Scientists.
 
What's fascinating about this is while Christian business owners and organizations -- most notably the Catholic Church, Domino's Pizza, and Hobby Lobby -- are fighting for their very lives resisting the violations of religious conscience in Obamacare, apparently Islam got a free pass.
 
Why?
Obama is a MUSLIM
http://traditionalvalues.org/content/home/36482/are_muslims_exempt_from_obamacare


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on October 28, 2013, 03:33:37 am
For starters, that doesn't explain what is meant by subsidized.

Also, what you quoted is being rather disingenuous. They are trying to make it sound like there is some big conspiracy that allows Muslims to be exempt.

It's not worded that way.

Quote
member of an exempt religious sect or division

Nowhere does that say "Muslim". People who are Muslim may be exempt, but so what? Americans have had ample opportunity to get their politicians in line but they haven't done it, so they are getting the results of apathy.

This whole "Obama is a Muslim" thing is getting old actually. Regardless of his religious beliefs, he's a thug, likely a foreigner, that should be tossed from office.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 28, 2013, 12:44:24 pm
This whole "Obama is a Muslim" thing is getting old actually. Regardless of his religious beliefs, he's a thug, likely a foreigner, that should be tossed from office.

He's also a CIA mind-controlled puppet, who was groomed for this position in the 1980's when he was at Harvard(by non-Muslims at that).

As for him supporting Islam - pretty much so did the Younger Bush, Elder Bush, and Ronald Reagan - the Younger Bush established a broader Palestinean State, the Elder Bush loosened immigration on Muslims, and Reagan supported Islamic terrorists in the ME.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on October 28, 2013, 01:02:26 pm
Yep, the Bush ties to the Saudi royal family is well known, and Obama, well, I think he was specifically groomed by the CIA, at least in part, from the time he entered college, at least. There's not much doubt his parents had their own CIA connections. It seems that his CIA direction came from the known training ground Occidental College. Harvard was to establish a pedigree for the establishment's sake I think. It was to pad his resume', as evidenced by the claim he was the law journal editor, yet no examples of any legal papers he's allegedly written have surfaced. And his focus was constitutional law? If he learned anything, then he knows full well he's in violation of the Constitution.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 11, 2013, 08:03:21 am
Michigan: CAIR discusses setting up sharia divorce courts for Muslim women

Posted on November 2, 2013 by creeping
Remember this post? Muslim women living under sharia law in America have trouble getting divorced

Well, apparently some imams in Detroit ain’t to happy about Muslim women exposing Islam’s war on women in Michigan and are now, led by Hamas-linked CAIR, planning on setting up sharia divorce courts.

via The Arab American News


DETROIT — A New America Media Women Immigrants Fellowship story on the difficulties of getting an Islamic divorce has sparked dialogue among local Muslim religious leaders on how to make divorce easier for women.

The article, by Natasha Dado of The Arab American News, describes the difficulties that Muslim women experience when their husbands refuse to grant them a religious divorce. Many are forced to go “imam shopping” and travel across the country to find an imam willing to grant them an Islamic divorce.

On Sept. 25, about 15 imams met in metro Detroit to discuss the article, which was published Sept. 19.

Hyperlinks added below.

Dawud Walid, executive director of the Council on American Islamic Relations, said many imams at the meeting agreed that injustice existed, surrounding the issue and discussed establishing an arbitration system that would help prevent women from having to go “imam shopping.” Walid said the subject was bought up as a result of the article.

The new system would consist of an arbitrational body that handles divorce disputes to prevent women from having to turn to multiple religious leaders when seeking a divorce. One issue with establishing such a system is that only approximately 20 imams attend the monthly meeting, and it would be necessary for all Muslim religious leaders in metro Detroit to agree on it.

The meetings between imams are held every month throughout the year to discuss important issues in the community. No follow-up meeting was held in October, because it is the time that Muslims around the world make the Hajj, the annual pilgrimage to Mecca.

A lot of Muslim women are denied a divorce, even when their husbands are very physically abusive towards them. Many women believe their rights are being violated and it is unjust imprisonment when they are not granted a divorce.

Islam is unjust imprisonment – that punishes those who leave with death.

http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2013/11/02/michigan-cair-discusses-setting-up-sharia-divorce-courts-for-muslim-women/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 11, 2013, 08:04:03 am
Michigan Muslims plot Islamic-law court
CAIR discussing establishment of Shariah divorce system


A leader in a front group for the movement that aims to turn the U.S. into an Islamic state is among the Muslims in the Detroit area talking about establishing religious courts that would grant women a divorce under Islamic law, or Shariah.

About 15 Muslim leaders – including Dawud Walid, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ Michigan chapter – discussed the issue at a monthly gathering Sept. 25.

The discussion was prompted by a story in the Arab American News that described the difficulties that Muslim women experience when their husbands refuse to grant them a religious divorce, noted the blog Creeping Sharia.

Don’t let the facts about Islam in America be covered up by slick CAIR lawyers! Join the fight to protect those who would expose the truth!

The Arab American News article said many are forced to go “imam shopping” and travel across the U.S. to find an imam willing to grant them an Islamic divorce.

The publication commented that many Muslim women are denied a divorce, even when their husbands are physically abusive.

In August, North Carolina became the seventh state to pass a bill prohibiting judges from considering foreign laws, including Islamic Shariah. Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Tennessee have similar laws.

Earlier this year, as WND reported, Germany banned three Muslim groups seeking to impose Shariah in the country. The move came after death threats against politicians and calls for a violent overthrow of the government.

In October, BBC News reported, an Indian woman who wrote a bestselling memoir about the brutality of Islamic law was killed by Taliban militants in Afghanistan.

CAIR, meanwhile, was named in 2007 by the U.S. Justice Department as an unindicted co-conspirator in a plot to fund the Palestinian terrorist organization Hamas.

According to FBI wiretap evidence from a 1993 meeting of Muslim Brotherhood leaders and activists in Philadelphia, CAIR was formed to burnish the image of Muslims in the U.S. in support of the Brotherhood’s stated aim of “destroying Western civilization from within” and replacing it with Islamic rule.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/michigan-muslims-plot-islamic-law-court/#KDfH6kcgA2u4m4am.99


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on February 05, 2014, 08:38:52 am
Muslims: We want schools closed on our holidays
Asking for equal time with Christian, Jewish students


Muslims in Montgomery County, Md., are petitioning local school officials to add two Islamic holidays that vary from year to year to the school calendar, and if needed, to shorten the “winter break” to make up for the days off.

“There is no need for any MCPS students to miss classroom instruction time if schools were to close for Eid holidays,” their petition argues. “There is a state law that mandates at least 180 classroom instruction days per year. That won’t change. If schools were to close on Eid holidays the missed days could easily be made up by slightly shortening the lengthy winter or summer breaks.

“Alternatively any of the many pre-existing school closings could be moved to coincide with Eid holidays,” the petition argues.

The Muslims want schools to close on Islamic holidays because they observe the Christian holidays of Easter and Christmas, and the Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashanah. The dates of Muslim holidays vary because they are based on the Islamic calendar.

The Muslims argue that the county schools already close on “Christmas, Good Friday, Easter Monday, Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur and Passover.”

The school calendar, however, notes that Yom Kippur is on a Saturday, and Passover is not mentioned.

Nevertheless, they want recognition of Eid al-Fitr, to mark the end of Ramadan, and Eid al-Adha, marking a pilgrimage to Mecca.

“Currently the thousands of Muslim MCPS staff and students have to choose between their education and observing their religious practices,” the coalition argues. “This is not a choice that our Christian and Jewish neighbors face on their holidays.”

According to a report in the local Gazette, the sponsor of the move is the Maryland chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR.

The Muslim coalition said other school districts that acknowledge their holidays include Burlington, Vt.; Cambridge, Mass.; Dearborn, Mich.; Skokie, Ill.; and Paterson and Trenton, N.J.

The chief operating officer of the district, Larry Bowers, however, points out that state law now allows districts to close only for secular purposes, reports Pamela Geller in her Atlas Shrugs blog.

The report noted the system already recognizes both Muslim holidays by declaring them non-testing days and giving Muslim students excused absences.

“Hamas-CAIR,” Geller commented, “is on the Islamic supremacist march in Maryland.”

“Latest front is the Montgomery County public schools,” she wrote. “They want them closed on Muslim holidays (does that include 9/11)? Of course, they frame this as a civil rights issue. 9/11 is a civil rights issue. I expect Zawahiri to frame Islam’s war on the West as a civil rights issue as well. There is nothing civil about the exploitation of the civil rights issue.

“I couldn’t help but chuckle at the name of the group, ‘Equality for Eid Coalition.’ Considering that there is no equality under the Shariah, it is particularly contemptible. Under the Shariah, non-Muslims are denied basic human rights and forced to live as sub-humans or dhimmis,” she said.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/muslims-we-want-schools-closed-on-our-holidays/

New York City public school kids getting new Muslim, Lunar New Year holidays

New York City is moving to close school for two Muslim holidays and the Lunar New Year — but Mayor de Blasio isn’t so sure about the Hindu festival Diwali. Appearing on WNYC’s “Brian Lehrer Show” on Monday, the mayor said he hadn’t taken a position on whether Diwali, the festival of lights celebrated in India and other South Asian countries, should be a day off from school. 

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/education/nyc-public-school-kids-new-holidays-article-1.1601237


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on February 05, 2014, 10:25:34 am
Quote
are petitioning local school officials to add two Islamic holidays

I'm surprised they took this long to insist on equal holidays. Which this whole thing of religion in public secular schools just cannot work, because you cannot make concessions for one or two groups and refuse others. That is discrimination in the most basic sense. All must be either included or excluded.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 05, 2014, 10:29:59 am
I'm surprised they took this long to insist on equal holidays. Which this whole thing of religion in public secular schools just cannot work, because you cannot make concessions for one or two groups and refuse others. That is discrimination in the most basic sense. All must be either included or excluded.

Yeah, if anything Churchianity has largely been responsible b/c they've always been demanding their rights in secular places of society.

US Constitution says freedom of religion is NOT favoring one religion over another(it's NOT this "separation of church and state" like a lot of these Churchianity pastors try to make you to believe).


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 18, 2014, 10:30:22 pm
http://www.clarionproject.org/analysis/islamists-mobilize-non-muslims-against-anti-foreign-law-ban
Islamists Mobilize Non-Muslims to Undermine Constitution
 
The 'American Law for American Courts' initiative has been falsely portrayed by Islamists as anti-Islam and racist.


By Ryan Mauro

Wed, February 12, 2014

Shoulder-to-Shoulder, an interfaith coalition allied with the Islamic Society of North America, is mobilizing its supporters against state legislation that stops foreign law from superseding the Constitution. The Islamists’ non-Muslim allies are helping frame it as an unnecessary, bigoted initiative that threatens all people of faith.

The coalition is holding a webinar on February 27. The announcement correctly notes that current legislation does not mention Shariah, though it is covered under the terminology of “foreign law.” Seven states have passed such bills since 2010.

Shoulder-to-Shoulder’s description makes it sound like the legislation is a ban on foreign law influencing judges’ decision altogether. It states:

“Most religious laws that influence these contracts (like Jewish Halakha, Catholic Canon law, or Islamic Shariah law) were not developed within the United States and would be considered foreign law under such legislation. While anti-Muslim sentiment is still the motivating factor behind these laws, Americans of every faith should be concerned about their impact on religious freedom.”

This is an easily refutable misrepresentation of the bills, based on the American Laws for American Courts draft legislation. It does not ban religious contracts like those mentioned by Shoulder-to-Shoulder, nor is it a blanket ban on foreign law. It only applies when there is a conflict between the U.S. Constitution and foreign law in court and it victimizes no one, especially not Muslims because Muslim-Americans are benefactors of it.

A 2011 study found 50 cases where Shariah or foreign law based on Shariah influenced the court case. The American Public Policy Alliance has a list of 10 cases where a Muslim-American party objected to the role of Shariah. The summary is as follows:

“In cases 1-3, the Appellate Courts upheld Shariah law; in cases 4-7, the Trial Courts upheld Shariah, but the Appellate Courts reversed (protecting the litigant’s constitutional rights); in cases 8-10, both Trial and Appellate Courts rejected the attempts to enforce Shariah law
.”

ALAC is sometimes criticized as unnecessary and driven by unsubstantiated paranoia. It is hard to imagine that an American judge would ever rule give foreign law precedence over American law. The American Public Policy Allianceexplains that the bill fixes a troublesome loophole:

Most states merely state that foreign laws and judgments that violate the state’s “public policy” shall not be recognized. But the courts consistently rule that the state legislature has the responsibility to articulate clearly what the state’s public policy actually is.

The ALAC website points out the hypocrisy of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. In response to business dress codes enforced on Muslim-American women in France, CAIR communications director Ibrahim Hooper unwittingly supported the rationale behind ALAC.

“A discriminatory dress code implemented in France does not supersede American laws protecting the religious rights of American citizens,” he said. He said CAIR is “defending American law from foreign intrusion.”

The American-Islamic Forum for Democracy supports ALAC-type bills because it has seen how Shariah has affected Muslims in Europe. The bills’ purpose is not to pre-empt a hypothetical situation. It’s a reaction to what is actually happening right now.

A 2010 study found that Shariah courts in the United Kingdom lack accountability, to say the least. There are not clear standards for appointing judges and monitoring proceedings and rulings often conflict with British law. For example, British courts’ first priority is the interest of the child. Shariah courts rule that children automatically go into the custody of the father after a certain age.

The British Justice Ministry investigated Shariah courts and had to end give up because of a lack of cooperation from the court staffs.

The misrepresentations by Shoulder-to-Shoulder stem from its relationship with the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity and unindicted co-conspirator in the trial of the Holy Land Foundation. The Foundation was another Brotherhood entity that was shut down for financing Hamas. This isn’t six degrees of separation: The Holy Land Foundation operated within ISNA, according to a 2009 ruling by a federal judge.

ISNA said on its website last month that it “founded” Shoulder-to-Shoulder to counter increasing bigotry against Muslims. Elsewhere on its website, ISNA saysit “helped convene” the coalition of 28 religious organizations. Whichever way it is worded, the point is that Shoulder-to-Shoulder is largely a product of ISNA.

And who is the ISNA official leading its interfaith campaign and, therefore, its work with Shoulder-to-Shoulder? Former Secretary-General Sayyid Syeed, who is seen in The Grand Deception documentary saying in 2006, “Our job is to change the constitution of America.” His current job title at ISNA is National Director of ISNA’s Office of Interfaith and Community Alliances.

That is the organization and individual that Shoulder-to-Shoulder works with. And Shoulder-to-Shoulder is just one example of how non-Muslims are being rallied to the cause.

The ALAC-inspired bills will not roll back religious freedom. Non-Muslims should read about the bill from the original source before following the lead of ISNA and its interfaith coalition.




 
 



Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on February 19, 2014, 05:19:05 am
This whole Islamic invasion thing is so ironic; a religious group arguing constitutional rights for rights they don't have under the US Constitution. They already have a right to not be discriminated against in their religious observances. What they are lobbying for is a right of priority or importance over all others, which the Constitution is completely opposed to and was drafted for to prevent groups from trying to pull this stunt on the public. It's classic thug, strong-arm tactics of bullies, and eventually, they get real mad and get violent if they don't get their way, like a spoiled brat. That kind of mentality isn't godly, it's wicked.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on February 24, 2014, 03:21:02 pm
Texas Police Double as Islamic Terrorist Militia

The jihad terror-trainings compounds in the U.S., a news story I first broke back in 2007, are growing. And now I have obtained exclusive information showing that one of them has placed members on local police forces, ensuring that nothing is done to stop or even monitor their activities.

PJ Media reported, "Federal Bureau of Investigations documents detailing a 22-site network of terrorist training villages sprawled across the United States. According to the documents, the FBI has been concerned about these facilities for about 12 years, but cannot act against them because the U.S. State Department has not yet declared that their umbrella group, MOA [Muslims of the Americas]/Jamaat ul-Fuqra, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization."

The Texas compound is called "Mahmoudberg," located in south Texas' Brazoria County on County Road 3 near the town of Sweeny, which has a population of about 4,000. Jamaat ul-Fuqra was the jihad terrorist organization that murdered journalist Daniel Pearl – he had gone to try to interview its leader. According to an informed source, one of Pearl's murderers now lives at Mahmoudberg.

I have also discovered that another member of the MOA compound in Sweeny is a police officer for the nearby city of Freeport; his name is Hussein Jones. Informed and well-placed sources have informed me that a few years ago, there was a shooting on the compound. County officers were called, as well as EMS. However, when they arrived, they faced hostile members of the compound who would not allow them inside.

A police officer who was at the scene said that as this confrontation was going on, a constable of the neighboring Fort Bend County came speeding up in his car and began angrily rebuking the police officers who were there. He also tried to prevent the officers and EMS technicians and paramedics from gaining access to the compound. This constable also turned out to be a member of the MOA compound. However, as a result of his behavior during this incident, he was fired from his position as constable, and county officials were ultimately able to get inside the compound, although Brazoria County police are still not allowed in.

My sources tell me also that the compound is made up of mobile buildings that the group regularly rearranges, always positioning them in a way so that if law enforcement had to storm the compound, they would be sitting ducks with a sure tactical disadvantage.

Police officials say there are no laws to stop this group from what they are doing, and they cannot do anything until they break some kind of law.

It is astonishing to me that these jihadists can so easily place themselves in positions of power right under our noses. How could law enforcement agencies in two different Texas counties have hired these two members of the MOA, even after vetting them – or did they vet them? Were they afraid of charges of "Islamophobia"? How can Hussein Jones still be employed by the Freeport Police Department?

After all, it isn't news that these compounds exist. I ran a piece by Paul Williams at my website Atlas Shrugs on Aug. 6, 2007, reporting that "Jamaat ul-Fuqra, a terrorist organization with headquarters in Pakistan, has established over 45 compounds in rural areas throughout America. The compounds are providing paramilitary training to new recruits for the great jihad against the USA under the not-so-watchful eye of federal law enforcement officials. Most of the recruits are African-Americans who converted to Islam while doing hard time in federal prison."

These are essentially America's no-go Shariah zones, where even police maintain a hands-off policy. Mahmoudberg's sister terror compound in New York, Islamberg, contains a campus of "The International Quranic Open University," at which students get training from manuals written by Jamaat ul-Fuqra leader Mubarak al-Gilani, who teaches them that the Muslim's "foremost duty" is to "wage jihad" against the "enemies" of Islam. Williams reported that "the students are also treated to Gilani's poetic tirades against Western civilization and his jihad jingles, such as this marching song:

"Come join my troops and army,"
Says our Sheikh Gilani.
"Prepare to sacrifice your head.
"A true believer is never dead.
"Say 'Victory is in the air,'
"The kafir's blood will not be spared."

Gilani boosts: "We give [students] specialized training in guerilla warfare. We are at present establishing training camps. You can easily reach us at Open Quranic offices in upstate New York or in Canada or in South Carolina or in Pakistan."

And Sweeny, Texas. Where are the law enforcement officials who aren't members of this compound? Too busy hunting for "right-wing extremists"?

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/02/texas-police-double-islamic-terrorist-militia/#xltj7PHiF00uTEZh.99


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on February 26, 2014, 02:41:40 pm
Federal Court Orders YouTube to Remove Anti-Muslim Film

A federal appeals court ordered YouTube on Wednesday to take down an anti-Muslim film that sparked violence in many parts of the Middle East.

The decision by a divided three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco reinstated a lawsuit filed against YouTube by an actress who appeared in the video. The 9th Circuit said the YouTube posting infringed actress Cindy Lee Garcia’s copyright to her role, and she, not just the filmmaker, could demand its removal.

The court’s ruling addressed control of the clip, not its contents, which YouTube determined didn’t violate its standards.

“Garcia’s performance was used in a way that she found abhorrent and her appearance in the film subjected her to threats of physical harm and even death,” Chief Judge Alex Kozinski wrote for the majority court. “Despite these harms, and despite Garcia’s viable copyright claim, Google refused to remove the film from YouTube.”

Garcia said she was duped into appearing in the film by the man behind it, Mark Basseley Youssef. She said the script she saw referenced neither Muslims nor Mohammad, and her voice was dubbed over after filming.

The 14-minute film, “Innocence of Muslims,” depicts Mohammad as a religious fraud, **** and womanizer.

It sparked violence in late 2012, but YouTube rebuffed requests from President Barack Obama to take it down, arguing that only the filmmaker and not the actress owned the copyright.

The court said the actress owned the copyright to her performance because she thought it was for another film unrelated to what ultimately aired.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/26/federal-court-orders-youtube-to-remove-anti-muslim-film/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on March 22, 2014, 08:50:53 pm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/10716844/Islamic-law-is-adopted-by-British-legal-chiefs.html
Islamic law is adopted by British legal chiefs

Solicitors told how to draw up Sharia-style wills penalising widows and non-believers

3/22/14

Islamic law is to be effectively enshrined in the British legal system for the first time under guidelines for solicitors on drawing up “Sharia compliant” wills.

Under ground-breaking guidance, produced by The Law Society, High Street solicitors will be able to write Islamic wills that deny women an equal share of inheritances and exclude unbelievers altogether.

The documents, which would be recognised by Britain’s courts, will also prevent children born out of wedlock – and even those who have been adopted – from being counted as legitimate heirs.

Anyone married in a church, or in a civil ceremony, could be excluded from succession under Sharia principles, which recognise only Muslim weddings for inheritance purposes.

Nicholas Fluck, president of The Law Society, said the guidance would promote “good practice” in applying Islamic principles in the British legal system.

Some lawyers, however, described the guidance as “astonishing”, while campaigners warned it represented a major step on the road to a “parallel legal system” for Britain’s Muslim communities.

Baroness Cox, a cross-bench peer leading a Parliamentary campaign to protect women from religiously sanctioned discrimination, including from unofficial Sharia courts in Britain, said it was a “deeply disturbing” development and pledged to raise it with ministers.

“This violates everything that we stand for,” she said. “It would make the Suffragettes turn in their graves.”

The guidance, quietly published this month and distributed to solicitors in England and Wales, details how wills should be drafted to fit Islamic traditions while being valid under British law.

It suggests deleting or amending standard legal terms and even words such as “children” to ensure that those deemed “illegitimate” are denied any claim over the inheritance.

It recommends that some wills include a declaration of faith in Allah which would be drafted at a local mosque, and hands responsibility for drawing up some papers to Sharia courts.

The guidance goes on to suggest that Sharia principles could potentially overrule British practices in some disputes, giving examples of areas that would need to be tested in English courts.

Currently, Sharia principles are not formally addressed by or included in Britain’s laws.

However, a network of Sharia courts has grown up in Islamic communities to deal with disputes between Muslim families.

A few are officially recognised tribunals, operating under the Arbitration Act.

They have powers to set contracts between parties, mainly in commercial disputes, but also to deal with issues such as domestic violence, family disputes and inheritance battles.

But many more unofficial Sharia courts are also in operation.

Parliament has been told of a significant network of more informal Sharia tribunals and “councils”, often based in mosques, dealing with religious divorces and even child custody matters in line with religious teaching
.

They offer “mediation” rather than adjudication, although some hearings are laid out like courts with religious scholars or legal experts sitting in a manner more akin to judges than counsellors.

One study estimated that there were now around 85 Sharia bodies operating in Britain. But the new Law Society guidance represents the first time that an official legal body has recognised the legitimacy of some Sharia principles.

It opens the way for non-Muslim lawyers in High Street firms to offer Sharia will drafting services. The document sets out crucial differences between Sharia inheritance laws and Western traditions.

It explains how, in Islamic custom, inheritances are divided among a set list of heirs determined by ties of kinship rather than named individuals. It acknowledges the possibility of people having multiple marriages.

“The male heirs in most cases receive double the amount inherited by a female heir of the same class,” the guidance says. “Non-Muslims may not inherit at all, and only Muslim marriages are recognised.

Similarly, a divorced spouse is no longer a Sharia heir, as the entitlement depends on a valid Muslim marriage existing at the date of death. This means you should amend or delete some standard will clauses.”

It advises lawyers to draft special exclusions from the Wills Act 1837, which allows gifts to pass to the children of an heir who has died, because this is not recognised in Islamic law.

Keith Porteous Wood, executive director of the National Secular Society, said: “This guidance marks a further stage in the British legal establishment’s undermining of democratically determined human rights-compliant law in favour of religious law from another era and another culture. British equality law is more comprehensive in scope and remedies than any elsewhere in the world. Instead of protecting it, The Law Society seems determined to sacrifice the progress made in the last 500 years.”

Lady Cox said: “Everyone has freedom to make their own will and everyone has freedom to let those wills reflect their religious beliefs. But to have an organisation such as The Law Society seeming to promote or encourage a policy which is inherently gender discriminatory in a way which will have very serious implications for women and possibly for children is a matter of deep concern.”


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on April 08, 2014, 04:38:32 pm
Muslim Brotherhood Launches Own U.S. Political Party

    (Investor's Business Daily)—With an eye toward the 2016 election, the radical Muslim Brotherhood has built the framework for a political party in America that seeks to turn Muslims into an Islamist voting bloc.

    "Muslim voters have the potential to be swing voters in 2016," said Nihad Awad in launching the benign-sounding U.S. Council of Muslim Organizations, whose membership reads like a Who's Who of Brotherhood front groups.

    "We are aiming to bring more participation from the Muslim community."

    USCMO also aims to elect Islamists in Washington, with the ultimate objective of "institutionalizing policies" favorable to Islamists—that is, Shariah law.

    This development bears careful monitoring in light of the U.S. Brotherhood's recently exposed goal to wage a "civilization jihad" against America that explicitly calls for infiltrating the U.S. political system and "destroying (it) from within."

    The subversive plan was spelled out in hundreds of pages of founding archives that the FBI confiscated from a Brotherhood leader's home in the Washington suburbs after 9/11.

    Translated from Arabic, the secret documents listed a number of Brotherhood front organizations—some of which just happen to make up the newly formed USCMO.

    Front and center is the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations, the catalyst behind this Trojan horse jihadist political party.

    CAIR is linked in federal criminal court documents to the terrorist group Hamas, the Brotherhood's Palestinian branch. CAIR's chief Awad, who announced the USCMO at the National Press Club, is so radioactive, the FBI refuses to do outreach with him and his so-called Muslim-rights group until it can "resolve whether there continues to be a connection between its executives and Hamas."

    Equally troubling is the Muslim American Society, another founding member of the USCMO. MAS was formed as "the overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States," a 2007 Justice Department court filing states. A 2011 MAS press release praised Osama bin Laden as "a visionary who believed in an Islamic state in Afghanistan."

    The list of bad actors doesn't end there. The chairman of America's new Islamist party is none other than Oussama Jammal, who once headed the notorious Bridgeview Mosque in Chicago.

    One of that mosque's leaders was arrested and jailed for funneling millions to Hamas. And one of its most honored guests was bin Laden's spiritual mentor, the late Palestinian cleric Abdullah Azzam. Some of Azzam's relatives are Bridgeview members.

    "The walls were covered with Hamas posters and recruiting literature showing masked gunmen brandishing automatic weapons.... You could see daggers plunged into Jewish hearts wrapped up in American flags," said Steve Emerson, describing the mosque in his book "American Jihad." "They even had a library filled with terrorist videos."

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/040114-695470-muslim-brotherhood-launches-own-american-political-party.htm?p=full


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on April 09, 2014, 03:39:42 pm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2597896/David-Camerons-religious-adviser-descended-founders-terrorist-Muslim-Brotherhood.html
David Cameron's religious adviser is descended from founders of the 'terrorist' Muslim Brotherhood

PM facing embarrassment over links between adviser and Islamist group
Adviser Tariq Ramadan is grandson of Muslim Brotherhood's founder


4/5/14



Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on April 10, 2014, 01:36:46 am
Quote
Tariq Ramadan is grandson of Muslim Brotherhood's founder

There is NO way they didn't know that!


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on April 21, 2014, 03:03:39 pm
Sharia in America: Democrats and Muslim Legislators seek to criminalize free speech


There is very dangerous legislation making its way through both the House of Representatives and Senate that will finish the United States. The sharia bill calls for Islamic blasphemy laws — the criminalization of speech that offends or insults — who, exactly? Well, that is up to the enforcer, is it not?

On Wednesday, Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced “The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014″ (S.2219), which seeks “to examine the prevalence of hate crime and hate speech on the Internet, television, and radio to better address such crimes.” Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) introduced a companion bill in the House – H.R. 3878.

Yes, we see, Hakeem. The first amendment protects all speech, not just speech that we like. Or else who would decide what’s good and what’s forbidden? Hakeem? When I was a young girl, the Nazis were given permission to march in a predominately Jewish neighborhood. In those days, Nazi mean something. Morality was still very much in the American DNA. Good and evil was understood — unlike today, where the left has banished such terms. Despite the horror of a Nazi march, they were given permission, and those of us who were repelled by such a monstrous action understood why permission was granted  because of the underlying premise — free speech. I didn’t worry that their Nazi ideas would take hold, as long as I could speak and others could speak in the free exchange of ideas. I knew I would win because my ideas were better. Individual rights was the greatest achievement of the enlightened.

Now we are here. Our free speech is threatened by islamic supremacists and their Democrat lapdogs under the guise of “hate speech.” The old “hate speech” canard. They will package this revolution against freedom in a pretty package — and will use the Max Blumenthal-inspired racist murderer,  Glenn Miller. But do not be fooled.

It’s bad enough they have all but blacklisted the voices of freedom from media, political and national discourse. Shouting into the wilderness is not freedom of speech.

What next? Burning books? Perhaps just as long as it’s not the quran. And yet there is more hate speech in the quran than in Mein Kampf.

The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014 (S.2219) is sharia. Start calling your congressmen (click here). Now. Put down everything. Do this. This is the line in the sand. If we lose this, it’s over.

    Sen. Ed Markey and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries Introduce Legislation To Examine and Prevent the Promotion of Hate Crimes and Hate Speech in Media, April 16, 2014

    Sen. Markey is author of original provision calling for examination of telecommunications influence on hate crimes

    Boston (April 16, 2014) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), a member of the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, introduced legislation to examine the prevalence of hate crime and hate speech on the Internet, television, and radio to better address such crimes. The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014 (S.2219) would create an updated comprehensive report examining the role of the Internet and other telecommunications in encouraging hate crimes based on gender, race, religion, ethnicity, or sexual orientation and create recommendations to address such crimes.

    In 1992, then-Rep. Markey, through the Telecommunications Authorization Act, directed the National Telecommunications and Information Administration to examine the role of telecommunications in encouraging hate crimes. Senator Markey’s legislation will provide a comprehensive updated report on the current prevalence of hate crimes and hate speech in telecommunications, as the last report was conducted and submitted to Congress over two decades ago, in December 1993. Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) introduced a companion bill in the House of Representatives, H.R. 3878.

    “We have recently seen in Kansas the deadly destruction and loss of life that hate speech can fuel in the United States, which is why it is critical to ensure the Internet, television and radio are not encouraging hate crimes or hate speech that is not outside the protection of the First Amendment,” said Senator Markey. “Over 20 years have passed since I first directed the NTIA to review the role that telecommunications play in encouraging hate crimes. My legislation would require the agency to update this critical report for the 21st century.”

    A copy of the legislation can be found HERE.

    “The Internet has proven to be a tremendous platform for innovation, creativity and entrepreneurship. However, at times it has also been used as a place where vulnerable persons or groups can be targeted,” said Rep. Jeffries. “I commend Senator Markey for his longstanding leadership with respect to combating Hate Crimes in America. He understands that in the digital era it is important to comprehensively evaluate the scope of criminal and hateful activity on the Internet that occurs outside of the zone of First Amendment protection. With the introduction of Senator Markey’s bill, we have taken a substantial step toward addressing this issue.”

    “I thank Senator Markey for his career-long commitment to ensuring that we have the data necessary to confront and combat hate speech in the media that targets our most vulnerable communities,” said President & CEO of the National Hispanic Media Coalition Alex Nogales. “NHMC has long-recognized that an update to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration’s 1993 report, ‘The Role of Telecommunications in Hate Crimes’, is long overdue and desperately needed given the incredible evolution of our communications systems over the past 21 years as well as the ever-increasing numbers of hate crimes targeting Latinos and others. As the author of the original piece of legislation directing the 1993 report, there is nobody better than Senator Markey to join Congressman Hakeem Jeffries and others in calling on the NTIA to study this pressing issue once again.”

- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/04/sharia-america-democrats-muslim-legislators-seek-criminalize-free-speech.html/#sthash.KbwvVuJM.dpuf


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on May 06, 2014, 06:59:00 am
School District Officials Reportedly Threatened Over Holocaust Assignment

School district officials in Rialto have received death threats in connection to a class assignment instructing students to debate the veracity of the Holocaust, according to reports Monday.

Rialto Unified School District officials first responded last week to reports of the assignment, which asked students to compose a written debate over whether the Holocaust was “merely a political scheme created to influence public emotion and gain.”

The controversial question in the assignment read: “…write an argumentative essay, based upon cited textual evidence, in which you explain whether or not you believe this was an actual event in history or merely a political scheme created to influence public emotion and gain wealth…”

The district initially defended the eighth-grade assignment – which was one part of an 18-piece essay – as an exercise to help students “evaluate the quality of evidence made by advocates or opponents of an issue.”

Rialto Police Captain Randy De Anda told KCAL 9′s Tom Wait the school district’s interim superintendent, Mohammed Z. Islam, received death threats in connection with the assignment. A district spokesperson was also threatened, De Anda said.

Officers were seen Monday standing guard outside district headquarters in response to the reported threats.

“We do not know who the suspect is at this time,” De Anda said. “However we do have some leads to follow up on.”

District officials – who say they have not received any complaints from parents about the project – are now revising the assignment, admitting it was a mistake, Wait reported.

“We are striking the sentence that claims, ‘Did the Holocaust occur?’ Absolutely the Holocaust occurred,” Rialto District spokesperson Syeda Jafri. “It was an error and we have to correct it,” Jafri added.

Jafri also said that the Education Services department was behind the assignment, and will be required to undergo sensitivity training.

The United Nations passed a 2007 resolution that condemns any denial of the Holocaust – which killed roughly 6 million Jews during World War II – and urges all member nations to “unreservedly” reject any denial of the Holocaust.

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2014/05/05/school-district-officials-reportedly-threatened-over-holocaust-debate-assignment/

You have muslims running the school district and wonder how this crept in...


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Kilika on May 08, 2014, 01:35:48 pm
Quote
You have muslims running the school district and wonder how this crept in...

Exactly. I think it's all part of the whole overall "Common Core" type movement in public schools, which is a poorly veiled effort by Islam to take over the US through education and the media, using our own Constitution as leverage, and institute Sharia Law. Then the goal moves on to the next phase, which would be, "Covert to Islam or die".

All those groups know the best way to institute their policies is by having their people in positions of control and decision-making for the public, in politics and in the courts. Once that happens, then there is no one to complain when they force Islam at the point of a sword.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 07, 2014, 07:48:55 am
http://news.yahoo.com/indias-supreme-court-sets-rules-sharia-courts-074003579.html
India's Supreme Court sets rules for Sharia courts
7/7/14

India's Supreme Court Monday rejected a petition seeking to ban Sharia courts, but stressed that they had no legal powers over Muslims and their decisions could not be enforced.

India's 150 million Muslims follow their own laws governing family life and other personal issues such as marriage and divorce, with Sharia courts used to rule on such matters and mediate in disagreements.

The top court said that Islamic judges, who interpret religious law, could only rule when individuals submitted voluntarily to them and their decisions, or fatwas, were not legally binding.

"Sharia courts are not sanctioned by law and there is no legality of fatwas in this country," C.K. Prasad said Monday as he read out the judgement from a two-judge bench.

The different personal laws followed by India's religious minorities are a sensitive political issue. The new Hindu nationalist government is committed to bringing in a common legal code for all.

Vishwa Lochan Madan, who petitioned the Supreme Court to disband Sharia courts, told AFP on Monday that his demand had been rejected.

"The Supreme Court observed that Sharia courts have no legal sanctity. But if people still want to approach these courts, it's their will," he said.

He filed his petition in 2005 and cited a case in which a woman was told to leave her husband and children and live with her father-in-law who had raped her.

"No religion is allowed to curb anyone's fundamental rights," the court added in its judgement while taking note of the case.

Qasim Rasool Niyazi, from the Muslim Personal Law Board, said the Supreme Court ruling vindicated his group's contention that Sharia courts were not a parallel judiciary.

They issue notices which are not legally binding, he explained. "It is just like an arbitration," he told the NDTV channel, adding that qadis (Islamic judges) were required to follow the law of the land.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on September 15, 2014, 06:21:45 am
‘Free’ Speech at Yale
A letter to the Muslim students protesting Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s lecture.


To the Yale Muslim Students Association and its many sister organizations that have co-signed a letter protesting Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s lecture on Monday:

I love your new free-speech concept! Obviously this woman should have been banned from campus and had her face stomped in; why couldn’t they have just quietly murdered her in Holland along with her fellow discomfort-creators? These people are worse than tweed underwear! They practically live to make undergraduates uncomfortable. But let’s deal with the harsh realities. Your inspired suggestion, having Official Correctors speak right after Ali to remind students of the authorized view of Muslim society, is the most exciting new development in Free Speech since the Inquisition — everyone will be talking about it! You have written, with great restraint, about “how uncomfortable it will be” for your friends if this woman is allowed to speak. Uncomfortable nothing. The genital mutilation of young girls is downright revolting! Who ever authorized this topic in a speech to innocent Yale undergraduates? Next thing you know, people will be saying that some orthodox Muslim societies are the most cruel and benighted on earth and that Western societies are better than they are (better!) merely because they don’t sexually mutilate young girls! Or force them into polygamous marriages, countenance honor killings, treat women as the property of their male relations, and all that. Can’t they give it a rest? You’d think someone was genitally mutilating them.

We all know that Free Speech doesn’t mean that just anyone can stand up and start spouting. Would you let your dog talk for an hour to a Yale student audience? What’s next, inviting Dick Cheney? Careful study of contemporary documents makes it perfectly clear that when the Bill of Rights mentions Free Speech, it is alluding to Freedom of Speech for the Muslim Students Association at Yale. We all know that true free speech means freedom to shut up, especially if you disagree with your betters. And true free thought means freedom to stop thinking as soon as the official truth is announced by the proper Authorities — and freedom to wait patiently until then.

Now take this Ayaan Hirsi Ali. First of all, she’s a black woman, and they’re not quite ready for prime time, know what I mean? And she’s against the systematic abuse of women in Muslim societies. What about people who are for the systematic abuse of women in Muslim societies? Furthermore, she lacks “representative scholarly qualifications.” Want the whole campus flooded with quacks expressing their so-called opinions based on “experience” and “knowledge” instead of academic authority? And she’s Dutch. More or less. Enough said.

Thank you for protecting us from having to listen to uncensored ideas and make up our own minds, Yale Muslim Students Association. Or at least trying. We will treasure your letter and keep it under our pillows forever.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/387933/free-speech-yale-david-gelernter


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 17, 2014, 11:59:48 pm
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/09/muslim-un-high-level-expert-says-muslims-in-west-become-terrorists-because-of-islamophobes-and-counter-terror-legislation
9/15/14
Muslim UN “high-level expert” says Muslims in West become terrorists because of “Islamophobes” and counter-terror legislation

Aftab Malik spent a month in Lakemba, “Australia’s unofficial Muslim capital.” He came away warning that the atmosphere in Lakemba “reminded him of London prior to the 7/7 terror bombings of 2005.” He says that the tensions have been “fuelled by the photos and videos of thousands of gruesome deaths in the West Bank, Gaza, Syria and Iraq viewed daily, unedited, on smartphones” — in other words, the budding jihadis are being “radicalized” by jihad grievance propaganda and resistance to jihad aggression and terror. They are apparently further “radicalized” by “the Islamophobes and their vitriolic diatribes against Islam and Muslims,” as well as by “legislation that, at worst, singles them out as potential terrorists, or moulds them as a suspect community at best.” In other words, they’re also being “radicalized” by writers who note how Islamic jihadis use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and supremacism, and by efforts to stop jihad terror plotting in Muslim communities.

So according to UN high-level expert Aftab Malik, in order to prevent young Muslims from the West from joining the Islamic State, Western non-Muslims must not talk about the jihad threat and its sources in Islamic texts and teachings; Western governments must cease counter-terror efforts at home; and all resistance to the “Palestinian” jihad and the Islamic State must cease. Then all will be quiet — and Aftab Malik is absolutely right, it will, because the free world will have surrendered and jihadis will have a free hand.

“Young misfits fall prey to pull of jihad,” by Trent Dalton and Greg Bearup, The Australian, September 13, 2014:

    …Last year, The Weekend Australian sat down with British Muslim Aftab Malik, a visiting member of the UN Alliance of Civilisations, a group of “high-level experts” formed by former UN secretary-general Kofi Annan in 2005 to “counter the forces that fuel polarisation and extremism”.

    Malik had spent a month embedded in Lakemba — Australia’s unofficial Muslim capital — studying young Muslim Australians. He warned of a “sense of uneasiness” in Australia that reminded him of London prior to the 7/7 terror bombings of 2005.

    Those simmering tensions he felt in Lakemba a year ago are now at boiling point — fuelled by the photos and videos of thousands of gruesome deaths in the West Bank, Gaza, Syria and Iraq viewed daily, unedited, on smartphones.

    Australia, Malik said, needed serious discussions on Muslim issues that reached beyond Halal meat and hijabs. “Unfortunately, for British Muslims it took the 7/7 terror attacks for us to have that discussion,” he said. “You need to pre-empt this. Don’t wait till something tragic happens.”

    “Something like what?” we asked.

    “Something tectonic,” he said.

    Yesterday, Malik said Muslims in the West were “stuck between a rock and a hard place”. “We have to address the Islamophobes and their vitriolic diatribes against Islam and Muslims,” he says.

    “In Sydney, we face a young community struggling between legislation that, at worst, singles them out as potential terrorists, or moulds them as a suspect community at best.

    “Rather than enfranchising the very community that would be the most potent weapon against a common enemy, the government appears to be alienating them.”

    Zakaryah Raad is one Australian-born Muslim from Sydney’s southwest who latched on to a hardline, literal interpretation of the Koran. He had no time to grow into a moderate view of Islam.

How much time does it take, and why? If the peacefulness of Islam is so obvious to non-Muslims like Barack Obama, David Cameron, and John Kerry, why isn’t it obvious to a Muslim like Zakaryah Raad?


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on October 04, 2014, 06:22:36 am
OIC Secretary General Warns Chicago Audience Not to Criticize Islam

...As Madani warned his Chicago audience about speaking against Islam, he was only reminding them of the OIC’s 10 year strategic plan, established in 2005 in part to advocate for an anti-blasphemy law regarding Islam. About freedom of expression, Madani made clear that, for Muslims, Islam is off-limits, saying that it “should not reach religious tales…we think freedom of expression ends there.” Attempting to draw an analogy about the discussion of sensitive subjects in American society and “insulting” or “contextualizing” a religious faith such as Islam, Madani continued “You have to give the same privilege and rights to others. There are certain limits to which the freedom of speech can reach where social values of one society should be considered as human values” and that insisting on free speech about such things is a “breach of human rights.” Although left unspoken by Madani, his reference to “human rights” clearly was meant to evoke for his Muslim audience specifically and only those rights permitted under shariah (Islamic Law).

Of course, the OIC authored the 1990 Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam, which states, “All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari’ah,” and “The Islamic Shari’ah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration.”...

full article:  http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2014/09/25/oic-secretary-general-warns-chicago-audience-not-to-criticize-islam/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 07, 2014, 07:24:16 am
‘There Is No God But Allah': Father Pulls Son From School Over Pro-Islam Textbook

A father in Massachusetts has pulled his son from school over outrage that students were being taught about Islam in a positive light, including a section that includes the sentence, “I bear witness that there is no God but Allah.”

“Muhammad never expected to change the world,” the textbook reads. “He was kind, and his nickname was ‘the truthful one.'”

“Muhammad tended sheep on the dry hills like many young Arabians. Later he became a successful merchant and married a wealthy widow. However, he felt as though something was missing in his life, so he went on a retreat,” it continues. “Muhammad went up to Mount Hira to pray in a small cave. He had studied both Judaism and Christianity, and he wanted to find a deeper meaning for his life.”

The reading assignment goes on to explain that the founder of Islam was “upset about the cruelty of his people” because they “killed baby girls” and “treated their slaves unkindly.”

“Muhammad had a strong sense of right and wrong,” it reads.

The textbook also included the Muslim Call to Faith, which states, “Allah is the greatest. I bear witness that there is no God but Allah. I bear witness that Muhammad is his prophet.”

Some parents of children who attend the Revere-area elementary school took no issue with the text as they believed that it was just a part of learning about the world around them.

“When you’re talking about a specific region in the world, there’s going to be traditions and there’s gonna be religions that children should learn about,” Ovidio Raffa told local television station WHDH.

But parent Anthony Giannino pulled his son from school after learning that his child was being taught about Islam in class.

“It says Allah is their only God. That’s insulting to me as a Christian who believes in just Jesus only,” he told the outlet. “We don’t believe in Allah. I don’t believe in my son learning about this here.”

Giannino said that advance notice should have been sent to parents to advise that their children were going to be studying the Islamic religion. He has now begun a petition about the matter.

The district has written a letter in response to the outrage, stating that the lesson was simply a part of the history curriculum.

“The current confusion stems from some members of the community thinking that we were teaching religion in relation to what students should believe,” Superintendent Paul Dakin wrote. “This is not the case at all. Islam, like all of the other major world religions, is studied in relation to the specific culture, time period or historical events are focusing on in a social studies or history class.”

“I want to be very clear that no religion is taught with the purpose of converting students religion, insulting their own religious beliefs, or promoting the beliefs of one religion as being superior to the other,” he continued. “t is impossible to study history without studying religion. For instance, it would be impossible to study the Puritans without understanding the religious freedoms they were seeking in the new world.”

As previously reported, in 1647, the Massachusetts Bay Colony passed “The Old Deluder Satan Act,” which required that children be taught to read so they could learn to read the Bible.

“In being one chief project of that old deluder, Satan, to keep men from the knowledge of the Scriptures, … and that learning may not be buried in the graves of our forefathers in Church and Commonwealth, the Lord assisting our endeavors, it is therefore ordered by this court and the authority thereof, that every township in this jurisdiction, after the Lord hath increased them to the number of fifty householders, shall then forthwith appoint one within their town to teach all such children as shall resort to him to write and read,” it read in part.

http://christiannews.net/2014/10/27/there-is-no-god-but-allah-father-pulls-son-from-school-over-pro-islam-textbook/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 15, 2014, 06:45:48 am
Allah Praised on House Floor

The house of representatives allowed an IMAM to praise Allah on the Floor of the house and give the opening prayer today, November 13th, 2014

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9Ydr7i1ZK2s

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/67576


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 15, 2014, 10:22:28 am
This was very recently??

Saw it the other day, and thought it was fro '06 or '07(when a Congressional member openly expressed discontent, and rightfully so).

Looks like this went right under the radar - so much over the GOP "landslide victory" 'changing' this country. ::)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 18, 2014, 05:50:57 am
Parents Pull Son from Class After Learning Middle School Teaching ‘Five Pillars of Islam’

 The parents of a middle school student in California are expressing concern after learning that their son was sent home with homework that required the student to outline key teachings of the Islamic religion.

The parents, who maintained their anonymity in a recent local television broadcast, showed reporters a copy of the papers their son had to complete for his homework assignment from Manhattan Beach Middle School. “What are the teachings of the Koran?” “What is the sunna?” and “What are the five pillars?”

“What I saw written in these bubbles was, ‘The one true god, Allah,'” the father explained, noting what his son had written in the section asking about the teachings of the Koran. “In one of the other bubbles was ‘All people must submit to Allah’ …  Then, I turned the page over and I see the five pillars of Islam.”

The parents state that while they don’t mind students being taught the history behind world religions, they believe it goes to far to ask to students to study the faiths in detail.

“Can you imagine the outcry all over this country if children were bringing home paperwork that asked them to write down John 3:16, or asked them to write down the 10 Commandments?” the father asked.

“And if it ended with the Declaration of the Faith, Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior,” the mother stated, pointing out that students were asked to write down the Muslim Declaration of the Faith. “That’s what, the equivalent [of what they're doing].”

The parents told local television station KTLA that they met with the principal about the matter, but because no changes were made in the curriculum, they will be pulling their son out of class.

“The audacity of this school to think that they can set these children down and teach them whatever religion they please,” the father said. “You can’t teach religion in schools anymore, but apparently in this particular school at least, it’s not the case.”

The story comes just days after a father in Massachusetts likewise pulled his son from elementary school after he learned that students were being taught about Islam in a positive light.

“Muhammad never expected to change the world,” the textbook lesson read. “He was kind, and his nickname was ‘the truthful one.’”

“It says Allah is their only God. That’s insulting to me as a Christian who believes in just Jesus only,” parent Anthony Giannino told local television station WHDH. “We don’t believe in Allah. I don’t believe in my son learning about this here.”

The district has written a letter in response to the outrage, stating that the lesson was simply a part of the history curriculum.

“The current confusion stems from some members of the community thinking that we were teaching religion in relation to what students should believe,” Superintendent Paul Dakin wrote. “This is not the case at all. Islam, like all of the other major world religions, is studied in relation to the specific culture, time period or historical events are focusing on in a social studies or history class.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=is52dUnrqtA

http://christiannews.net/2014/11/17/parents-pull-son-from-class-after-learning-middle-school-teaching-five-pillars-of-islam/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 23, 2014, 03:46:45 pm
One Colorado School Bans Christian Discussion,
Another Pledges “In Allah We Trust”


In Fort Collins, Colorado, Rocky Mountain High School Principle Tom Lopez has the students reciting “In Allah we Trust” in the name of diversity. Just a hundred miles south in the suburbs of Colorado Springs, the Principal of Pine Creek High School has banned groups discussing Christianity during free time to protect “the separation of church and state.” Confused yet?

For three years now Chase Windebank, a Pine Creek High School senior, has led a Christian based discussion group during free time when students are free to “do as they please.” In what Windebank claims is a direct violation of his first amendment right, he has now been told the group could no longer discuss God during free time because they are violating the “separation of church and state.”

Now Windebank, with the help of the Alliance for Defending Freedom law firm, is fighting back with a lawsuit to reclaim his First Amendment right to continue his religious discussion group. He now has the support of some powerful allies like Fox News columnist Todd Starnes and conservative columnist and entrepreneur Michelle Malkin.

On the other hand, Fort Colorado Principal Tom Lopez insists that reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in Arabic, as well as other languages, is a totally appropriate student-based decision coming from their “Culture Club” which “doesn’t fall under the umbrella of the district.”

However, many residents disagree. Some say they feel strongly that the Pledge of Allegiance is sacred, powerful, important, and should be recited in English.

“As a veteran and friend of a man killed defending these children in their little games
they like to play with our pledge, I’m offended. There are things that we don’t mess with
– among them are the pledge and our anthem,”

wrote Chris Wells in the Daily Coloradoan.

“If they wish to adopt the country as their own,
then they need to learn the language and start speaking it,”

wrote another reader.

The majority of Muslims are not radical fundamentalists, yet the hostility might have something to do with the atrocities carry out by the radical Muslims against the American people in the name of their god Allah. Allah doesn’t sit well with many who have lived through 9/11 or watched the recent be-headings around the world. Ibrahim Hooper, of the Council on American Islamic Relations asks:

“How on earth is it un-American to recite the Pledge of Allegiance in another language?”

A valid question, diversity is important, tolerance is imperative, but my question would be:

If Chase Windebank had a Muslim based discussion group during free time,
would Tom Lopez dare to shut him down?

I doubt it.

 

Watch the latest video
http://viral.buzz/one-colorado-school-bans-christian-support-and-another-pledges-in-allah-we-trust/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on December 20, 2014, 08:36:52 am
Mom Says She Uncovered ‘Very Shocking’ Content When She Decided to Look Over Her Child’s Vocabulary Lesson

The parents of a high school student in Farmville, North Carolina, are seeking answers regarding a Common Core-aligned vocabulary assignment given to their child that they claim is essentially Islamic propaganda.

The assignment was reportedly given to seniors at Farmville Central High School and included several pro-Islamic messages.

The worksheet reportedly read: “In the following exercises, you will have the opportunity to expand your vocabulary by reading about Muhammad and the Islamic word.”

The assignment used the words astute, conducive, erratic, mosque, pastoral, and zenith in sentences about Islam.

“The responses to Muhammad’s teachings were at first erratic. Some people responded favorably, while other resisted his claim that ‘there is no God but Allah and Muhammad his Prophet,” one sentence read.

Read some of the other sentences via FoxNews.com below:

(http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/muslimworksheet-620x348.jpg)

A parent, who asked to remain anonymous, told the news outlet that it was “very shocking” to read the religious material.

“I just told my daughter to read it as if it’s fiction. It’s no different than another of fictional book you’ve read,” she said.

One of the students who was reportedly in the class in which the assignment was given told FoxNews.com that she was “caught off guard” by the content.

“I just looked at it and knew something was not right – so I emailed the pages to my mom,” the student added.

A Pitt County Schools spokesperson reportedly confirmed the assignment is from a state-adopted workbook that meets “Common Core standards for English Language Arts.”

“Our school system understands all concerns related to proselytizing, and there is no place for it in our instruction/ However, this particular lesson was one of many the students in this class have had and will have that expose them to the various religions and how they shape cultures throughout the world,” the district said in a statement.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/12/19/mom-says-she-uncovered-very-shocking-content-when-she-decided-to-look-over-her-childs-vocabulary-lesson/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on January 15, 2015, 05:46:16 am
Muslim Call To Prayer Beginning At Duke University


Starting this Friday, students at Duke University will be hearing a 1 p.m. Muslim call to prayer.

According to WRAL, “members of the Duke Muslim Students Association will chant the call, known as adhan or azan, from the Duke Chapel bell tower.”

Officials from Duke said in a statement that the prayer will last three minutes and be moderately amplified.

“The adhan is the call to prayer that brings Muslims back to their purpose in life, which is to worship God, and serves as a reminder to serve our brothers and sisters in humanity,” said Imam Adeel Zeb, Muslim chaplain at Duke. “The collective Muslim community is truly grateful and excited about Duke’s intentionality toward religious and cultural diversity.”

“This opportunity represents a larger commitment to religious pluralism that is at the heart of Duke’s mission,” said Christy Lohr Sapp, the chapel’s associate dean for religious life. “It connects the university to national trends in religious accommodation.”

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/muslim-call-prayer-beginning-duke-university


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on January 15, 2015, 05:47:42 am
Oxford University Press Bans Pigs From Children’s Books As Not To Insult Muslims Or Jews
But they didn't ask the Muslims or the Jews


This little piggy went to market, this little piggy stayed home, and this little piggy was banned by Oxford University Press (OUP) because they didn't want to insult Muslims or Jews. Instructions by the educational publisher "prohibits authors from including anything that could be perceived as pork-related in their books."

The Daily Mail reports that the latest of example of political correctness gone berserk was revealed on Tuesday "during a discussion about free speech on Radio 4’s Today programme."

The published made the decision "to avoid offense among Jews and Muslims," but without consulting with Jews and Muslims.

For example, while Jewish law forbids eating pork, reading about pigs or pork is allowable. In fact, so is playing with an American football if it is made from pigskin.

The spokesman for Great Britain's Jewish Leadership Council agreed, "Jewish law prohibits eating pork, not the mention of the word, or the animal from which it derives.

    Muslim Labour MP Khalid Mahmood said: ‘I absolutely agree. That’s absolute utter nonsense. And when people go too far, that brings the whole discussion into disrepute.’

    Tory MP Philip Davies said: ‘How on earth can anyone find the word “pig” or “pork” offensive?

    'No word is offensive. It is the context in which it is used that is offensive.’

    He added: ‘On the one hand you have politicians and the great and the good falling over each other to say how much they believe in freedom of speech and on the other hand they are presiding over people being unable to use and write words that are completely inoffensive.

    'We have got to get a grip on this nonsensical political correctness.

    ‘The political correctness brigade appear to have taken control of our schools.

No word on whether this or any of the other little piggies were eligible for unemployment.

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/oxford-university-press-bans-pigs-childrens-books-not-insult-muslims-or-jews


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on January 15, 2015, 05:59:28 pm
http://news.yahoo.com/duke-cancels-plan-muslim-call-prayer-tower-205717099.html
Duke cancels plan for Muslim call to prayer from tower
1/15/15

DURHAM, N.C. (AP) — Duke University canceled its plan to use a chapel tower for a weekly call to prayer for Muslims after getting bombarded with calls and emails from alumni and others, officials said Thursday.

Instead, Muslims will gather for their call to prayer in a grassy area in front of the chapel before heading into a room in the chapel for their weekly prayer service. The university had initially said a moderately amplified call to prayer would be read by members of the Muslim Students Association from the tower for about three minutes each Friday.

Schoenfeld said it would up to the students if they want to use some sort of speaker or megaphone.

"There was considerable traffic and conversation and even a little bit of confusion, both within the campus and certainly outside, about what Duke was doing," said Michael Schoenfeld, vice president for public affairs and government relations. "The purposes and goals and even the facts had been so mischaracterized as to turn it into a divisive situation, not a unifying situation."

The plan drew the ire of evangelist Franklin Graham, the son of the Rev. Billy Graham, who urged Duke alumni to withhold support because of violence against Christians that he attributed to Muslims. He wrote on Facebook that the decision is playing out as "Christianity is being excluded from the public square."

He wrote later in the day that the university made the right decision to cancel. However, Schoenfeld said the reversal was not based solely on Graham's opposition.

Shalini Subbarao, 19, a sophomore from St. Louis, said as she walked in front of the chapel that she was disappointed with the school's reversal.

"I thought it was really progressive. It showed out openness to other religions," she said of the original plan.

The campus was mostly business as usual on Thursday afternoon, with students starting to head from class. Several said they were not familiar with the issue, while others' reactions were mixed.

The chapel is identified by the school as a Christian church but also hosts Hindu services and has been used for Buddhist meditations.

The chapel's associate dean for religious life, Christy Lohr Sapp, said before the plans were canceled that the move showed the school's commitment to religious pluralism. In a column written for the News and Observer in Raleigh, Lohr Sapp acknowledged the headlines generated by violence by extremists in ISIS, Boko Haram and al-Qaida, contrasting it to what's happening on campus.

"Yet, at Duke University, the Muslim community represents a strikingly different face of Islam than is seen on the nightly news: one that is peaceful and prayerful," she wrote.

The private university in Durham, northwest of Raleigh, was founded by Methodists and Quakers, and its divinity school has historically been connected to the United Methodist Church. It has nearly 15,000 students, including about 6,500 undergraduates. The school's insignia features the Christian cross and a Latin motto translated as "learning and faith."

The university says it has more than 700 students who identify themselves as Muslim. Schoenfeld said Duke was one of the first universities in the country to have a full-time Muslim imam when the first was named in 2008. Muslim students have been holding prayer services in the basement of the chapel for the past two years.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on January 15, 2015, 10:23:52 pm
Quote
The chapel is identified by the school as a Christian church

(http://www.clubbaseball.org/div2/GetImage.aspx?fileId=1005)

A DEVIL as the mascot... nuff said.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on January 19, 2015, 08:06:49 am
UCLA Broadcasting Muslim Call to Prayer Declaring ‘Allah is Great’ on Campus

Less than a week after controversy erupted over an announcement that a Muslim call to prayer would be broadcast at North Carolina’s Duke University, it has come to light that students at UCLA in California have been doing so for some time.

On Friday, a video was published on YouTube of students broadcasting the call to prayer on the north side of the UCLA campus near the athletic field off Sunset Boulevard. While the audio is faint, Arabic-style chanting can be heard in the footage as students gathered on the lawn.

The university does have an Islamic Student Association on Campus, which meets for jummah prayers in the Pyramid Room on the second floor of the John Wooden Center. It also publishes a Muslim news publication known as Al-Talib.

“I bear witness that there is none worthy of being worshiped except Allah,” the common Muslim chant, known as the adhan, declares. “I bear witness that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. … Allah is most great.”

Reports state that the adhan has been broadcast at UCLA for some time—to the consternation of some who were already perplexed by the Duke matter.

“The call to prayer is something that is blasted over loudspeakers in Muslim majority countries and Muslim enclaves around Detroit,” wrote Carol Brown of American Thinker. “We’ve already heard enough ‘Allahu Akbar’ for a lifetime.”

As previously reported, Duke University had outlined in its student paper earlier on Tuesday that the “moderately amplified” chant would take place beginning Friday from the chapel bell tower.

“Members of the Duke Muslim Students Association will chant a weekly call-to-prayer from the Duke Chapel bell tower beginning Friday, Jan. 16,” Duke Today reported. “The chant, called the ‘adhan,’ announces the start of the group’s jummah prayer service, which takes place in the chapel basement each Friday at 1 p.m.”

But as the call to prayer made headlines nationwide, some expressed concern over the accommodation in light of the violence that thousands of Muslims are committing worldwide in the name of Allah. Duke University was flooded with calls and emails from those nationwide that opposed the accommodation. On Thursday, the university announced that it had changed its plans.

Instead of having the Muslim call to prayer broadcast from the chapel bell tower, Duke University said that Islamic students would instead gather outside of the chapel to chant their call to prayer before moving inside to continue their meeting. On Friday, approximately 100 Muslim students attended the call to prayer, which was broadcast from the chapel steps via a small speaker.

According to reports, another 300 students gathered in support of the Islamic call to prayer, including students who professed to be Christians.

Duke University, which was founded by Methodists and Quakers in the 1800’s and carries the motto “Knowledge and Faith,” notes that it hired its first full-time Muslim chaplain in 2009 and also launched its Center for Muslim Life that same year. It says that there are more than 700 students at the Bible Belt university that identify as Muslim.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=atYwe6513oc

http://christiannews.net/2015/01/18/ucla-broadcasting-muslim-call-to-prayer-declaring-allah-is-great-on-campus/


Just imagine if they were to broadcast a prayer in Jesus name across the campus also?


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 09, 2015, 08:16:59 pm
America’s First Islamic Tribunal Based on Sharia Law Being Operated in North Texas
http://christiannews.net/2015/02/08/americas-first-islamic-tribunal-based-on-sharia-law-being-operated-in-north-texas/#sthash.GFBsQmk6.dpuf
2/8/15

IRVING, Texas – America’s first Islamic tribunal based on Sharia law is being operated in North Texas, according to reports.

The court, located in Irving, has availed itself to the community to arbitrate disputes between Muslims, such as divorce proceedings, business conflicts and other civil matters.

“All our decisions point back to the Koran and Sunna … and what the prophet Mohammed left to us,” Dr. Taher el-Badawi, Islamic Tribunal judge, told KEYE TV.

But the three men who operate the court state that they do not seek to override the existing courts or the U.S. Constitution.

“We are not here to invade the White House or invade Austin,” Imam Moujahed Bakhach told reporters. “We are humble and want to settle a problem between Muslims.”

The Islamic judges state that their rulings are non-binding, and that they simply “give [people] the Islamic point of view—that’s about it—and it’s up to them to follow or not to follow.” Criminal cases are not among the issues handled.

Bakhach stated that he believes there are misunderstandings about Sharia law.

“Maybe in their mind, the misconception about what they see through the media is that Sharia means cut the head, chop the heads, cut the hands, and we are not in that,” he told CBS Dallas/Fort Worth.

But some state that Sharia law does indeed require stoning and maiming persons under criminal law—it’s just that the Irving location is not taking cases of that nature.

“There is no school of Islamic jurisprudence among either Sunnis or Shiites that does not mandate stoning for adultery, amputation of the hand for theft and the subjugation of women,” wrote Robert Spence of Jihad Watch in a 2012 blog post.

“Stoning adulterers is in accord with the words and example of Muhammad, whom the Quran holds up as the supreme example of conduct for believers (33:21); amputation of the hand for theft is mandated in the Quran itself (5:38); and the oppression of women in numerous ways is amply attested by the words of both the Quran and the prophet of Islam,” he continued.

Some are also questioning where the existence of Islamic tribunals on U.S. soil might lead.

“[W]hat happens when U.S. law conflicts with their religious beliefs? Is allowing Islamic tribunals to operate in this country essentially opening the door for Islamic law to undermine or even replace U.S. law?” asked Monica Sanchez of MRCTV.

“I think what we will see is a coercion of Muslims to participate in this program,” opined Dr. Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy.


Several states have introduced legislation that prohibits foreign law from being used in the courts.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 16, 2015, 05:23:45 pm
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Islamic-court-sharia-law-poll-Texas/2015/02/12/id/624516/
Poll: Establishment of Islamic Court in Texas Raises Fears
2/12/15

Well over a third of Americans fear that the establishment of an Islamic court in Texas means that harsh sharia law soon could spread throughout the United States.

A poll by LifeWay Research discovered that 37 percent of Americans fear Islamic courts soon will be handing down rulings across the country.

Ed Stetzer, executive director of LifeWay Research, said, "In a nation that has long espoused religious freedom, Americans are thinking long and hard about the kind of society Islam fosters, especially the more radical groups that say they are Islamic, and whether Sharia law would ever be adopted here."

The Islamic Center of Learning in Irving, Texas, recently announced the formation of the first sharia court in the U.S.

Irving Mayor Beth Van Duyne stated, "Recently, there have been rumors suggesting that the city of Irving has somehow condoned, approved, or enacted the implementation of a sharia law court in our city," the Christian Post reported.

"Let me be clear, neither the city of Irving, our elected officials or city staff have anything to do with the decision of the mosque that has been identified as starting a sharia court."

However, the LifeWay poll suggests that Americans are very concerned.

Older Americans are more concerned, with nearly half of those over age 45 surveyed, or 47 percent, expressing worries, while just 27 percent of Americans between 18 and 44 years old worry about it, the study found.

Women, at 42 percent, were more concerned than men, at 33 percent. Slightly more than half, or 51 percent, of evangelicals voiced concerns, while only 34 percent of Catholics and 21 percent of those with no religious preference shared their concern.

Imam Moujahed Bakhach of the mosque in Irving told Christian News Network, "We are not here to invade the White House or invade Austin. We are humble and want to settle a problem between Muslims. Maybe in [America's] mind, the misconception about what they see through the media is that Sharia means cut the head, chop the heads, cut the hands, and we are not in that."

In the LifeWay poll, nearly half of Americans, or 48 percent, disagreed with President Barack Obama's Sept. 10, 2014, statement: "[ISIS] is not Islamic." Only one in four, or 22 percent, agreed with him.

However, 43 percent of those polled agreed that Islam "can create a peaceful society," LifeWay states. Only 27 percent believe that ISIS shows what life looks like when Islam controls a society, while 47 percent believe it does not. :o

Van Duyne, the mayor of Irving, said, "Texas Supreme Court precedent does not allow the application of foreign law that violates public policy, statutory, or federal laws. I am working with our state representatives on legislation to clarify and strengthen existing prohibitions on the application of foreign law in violation of constitutional or statutory rights," Christian News reported.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/Islamic-court-sharia-law-poll-Texas/2015/02/12/id/624516/#ixzz3RxdumGSd
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 27, 2015, 11:08:51 am
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/metro/20150223-islamic-tribunal-in-dallas-draws-criticism-and-clients.ece
Islamic tribunal in Dallas draws criticism and clients
2/23/15

An Islamic tribunal, launched in Dallas last year to settle civil disputes among the growing Muslim population, is drawing quarrels over its use of Shariah law.

Opponents fear it would open the door to extreme practices and corporal punishment linked to Shariah law in certain Muslim-majority countries. Still others argue it would replace the U.S. Constitution.

But organizers say the panel of arbitrators issues nonbinding decisions on matters such as business disputes and religious divorces. They note its parallels with Jewish rabbinical courts and Catholic tribunals.

The very word “Shariah” invokes backlash from those who don’t understand it and use it as a “catch phrase for fear-mongering against Islam and Muslims,” said Hadi Jawad, a Dallas businessman and a Muslim.

Tribunals are used in his native Pakistan. “The court system was so clogged and inefficient, it was a handy means to settle conflicts,” Jawad said. “There was usually a handful of judges experienced in Islamic law who could readily handle conflicts.”

Tea party activist Jerry Roehrig wants the North Texas tribunal disbanded.

“I am concerned about corporal punishment and how Shariah law handles women and non-Muslims,” he said. Shariah law “puts itself above our constitution. We can’t have that or we lose the country.”

Criticism also comes amid backlash blaming all Muslims for violence of the Islamic State, known as ISIS. Many U.S. Muslim groups say ISIS is “un-Islamic” and not a state.

In Irving, Mayor Beth Van Duyne jumped into the controversy after reports that the court was on the grounds of a large mosque there. In a Facebook post, she said the city had nothing to do with the tribunal and that she was trying to understand how it worked. She said if basic rights are being violated, “I will not stand idle, and will fight with every fiber of my being against this action.”

The court uses a conference room in a northeast Dallas law office, where one of the judges works. During a visit there, that judge, Taher el-Badawi, said the tribunal has settled about two dozen cases, mostly of divorcing couples.

“Our community really needs an Islamic tribunal to solve problems,” he said. “And we save money and save time for all the community.”

Managing the cultural diversity within the U.S. Muslim community can be challenging, the organizers said.

About 2 out of 3 U.S. Muslims is foreign-born, according a Pew Research Center study from 2011. No single racial or ethnic identity applies to more than 30 percent of the Muslim-American population, Pew said.


That’s reflected in the tribunal. El-Badawi has a law degree from his native Egypt and a master’s in international law from Southern Methodist University. The two other judges are Lebanon-born Imam Moujahed Bakhach of the Islamic Association of Tarrant County, and Pakistan-born, British-raised Imam Zia ul-Haque Sheikh of the Islamic Center of Irving.

Their website — Islamictribunal.org — says: “Experienced judges ready to fight for you,” and “Great advisors solve problems.”

Consultations are free, but a full panel ruling costs $600, el-Badawi said. Hearings take place at the Dallas offices or in conference rooms at some of the nearly 60 mosques in North Texas.

As the controversy has brewed, Imam Zia clarified in a written statement: “These religious tribunals ... do not attempt to impose any belief system upon any individual and work in compliance with State of Texas and U.S. law under the United States Constitution.”

In Arabic, Shariah means “path to water.” It is a personal moral code and religious law, scholars say. It covers issues ranging from dietary restrictions to divorces to punishment for stealing and killing.

Some associate Shariah law with corporal punishment, such as hand amputation for theft, which is a rare practice in other countries, said Alia Salem, executive director of the DFW chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations..

Most scholars, especially in the West, believe such mutilation isn’t “dispensing the laws properly,” Salem said. “There is huge controversy in the Muslim world with regard to that type of punishment.”

Robert A. Hunt, director of global theological education at SMU’s Perkins School of Theology, lived in Muslim-dominated Malaysia for seven years and is an Islam specialist.

Religious court rulings must be consistent with U.S. law, Hunt said. “I’ve researched this carefully, and I know of no case where the judge has ruled on Shariah, as opposed to American law,” he said.

A 2013 report from the Pew center supports that statement. “Disputes over the laws of various religious traditions have occasionally made their way into U.S. civil courts,” it says, “but the Supreme Court consistently has ruled that judges and other government officials may not interpret religious doctrine or rule on theological matters.”

In the U.S. Catholic church, there are nearly 200 diocesan tribunals that handle 15,000 to 20,000 marriage annulments yearly, Pew said. Many Orthodox Jews use rabbinical courts for religious divorces or to resolve business conflicts under Jewish law, known as halakhah, Pew noted.

The 2013 Pew study found no Shariah courts in the U.S. at that time. But imams have long served as voluntary mediators at U.S. mosques.

All the same, a bill proposed in the Texas legislature by Rep. Jeff Leach, R-Plano, would prohibit family court rulings based on foreign legal codes. The bill doesn’t target any one religion, an office staff member said. The National Conference of State Legislatures said there are now seven similar laws in other states.

In North Texas, most tribunal decisions have been done for Muslim immigrants.

El-Badawi said in one case a Christian woman considering divorce from her Muslim husband sought assistance. “They didn’t take our decision, but at least they felt secure in coming to us,” he said.

Women who are reluctant to go to a tribunal of men can meet first with a female counselor. El-Badawi said he would welcome a woman as a tribunal member if she is trained in Islamic law.

Salem said she went to Imam Moujahed, a certified mediator, a few years ago for a religious divorce. She then went to a civil court for the legal divorce under U.S. law.

Moujahed, who is one of the tribunal judges, said he counsels men to view women as equals. “In some cultures, the man is like a God and the wife has to be submissive. This is not Islamic. The wife is a partner.”

Moujahed also tells fellow Muslims: “Get out of your cocoon. Meet your neighbor.”

His own message to those of other faiths: “Please, just be fair-minded and ask if you don’t understand. We need better understanding of those of different faiths.”


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on March 09, 2015, 07:40:39 am
Michigan City Unanimously Passes Muslim-Based Resolution Against ‘Hatred’

 A city council in Michigan has unanimously voted to pass a Muslim-based resolution against religious discrimination and hatred.

While the resolution does not specifically mention Islam, Councilman Alex Garza told the News Herald that he introduced the measure to stand in solidarity with the National Network of Arab American Communities’ “Campaign to Take on Hate.” The campaign had been launched recently following the death of three Muslim students in North Carolina who had been shot by an atheist neighbor last month. A motive behind the incident is still being investigated.

“[Taylor] agrees to protect all its citizens and families no matter their religion or ethnicity,” the resolution reads. “As public servants we have an even greater responsibility to speak out against discrimination and hatred because when the unacceptable becomes the norm in our society, human rights for all are threatened.”

“[We will] stand against those who preach hate and incite violence,” it declares.

“I think we should all remind ourselves that this country was not built on us hating each other,” Garza said. “ I think we have to make sure that we continue to remind each other that we support each other and make sure we point out hate when it occurs.”

“This resolution does not commit the city to anything,” he added. “We’re committing to continuing to take on hate in this country.”

Former State Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Muslim, attended the meeting, and told city council that she had been observing “alarming increases in hateful statements” against those of the Islamic religion.

    Connect with Christian News

“Engaging our neighbors and colleagues and public servants like yourselves who are not of Arab descent or of Muslim faith is critical in combating increasingly negative images that are leading to criminal acts of violence against places of worship, schools and now even our homes,” she said, asserting that Muslims are now under attack  and in danger.

But two area residents who were present spoke against the resolution. One of those was Fred Lyons, who told city council that the measure was unnecessary as no one believes that it is rightful to hate another person.

“I don’t see why we need a resolution to say we’re against hate. We are,” Lyons said. “Anyone who would say you are supporting hate would be asinine.”

Others outside of the city are also expressing concern over the resolution.

“Jihadists are conducting a genocide against Christians across the world and US politicians are passing resolutions prohibiting criticism of genocide, gender apartheid, creed apartheid, misogyny and Islamic Jew-hatred,” wrote Pamela Geller of the Freedom Defense Initiative and Altas Shrugs. “Islamic supremacists are embedding themselves in school boards, town councils, etc., to impose Islam on secular American society. Embedded Muslims … are passing resolutions to impose the sharia — to prohibit criticism of Islam and jihad.”

The Detroit City Council likewise recently passed a resolution in support of the National Network of Arab American Communities campaign, and other cities nationwide, such as Chicago and Los Angeles are expected to consider the measure. It is believed that the effort is based in Dearborn, which has one of the largest Muslim populations in the United States.

http://christiannews.net/2015/03/08/michigan-city-unanimously-passes-muslim-based-resolution-against-hatred/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on March 22, 2015, 06:39:34 am
'One Nation Under Allah' - School Pledge Of Allegiance In Arabic Leaves Out God And Infuriates US Veterans, Students And Parents As School Issues Apology

A school in New York has been forced to apologize after having students recite the pledge of allegiance in Arabic while leaving out 'God'. Angering countless US Veterans who fought for and won the right for Americans to have the freedom to say the 'Pledge of Allegiance' in English, Pine Brook High School in New York high school succeeded in enraging its' students, parents, US Veterans and now much of the nation for a recent recitement of the 'Pledge' that was done in the Arabic language and substituted 'One Nation Under Allah' for God, prompting a viral outpouring of anger, as shared in the newly released videos below.

The reading of the 'pledge' this week has divided the school and infuriated some parents who took great offense to the events as the school took calls from angry parents who had lost family members overseas as well as Jewish parents, still upset over chronic, anti-semitic behavior at the school back in 2013 that forced them to file a lawsuit in federal court against the school district.

Is it just a coincidence that a school system which failed to stop blatant hatred towards Jews is now pushing the 'Pledge of Allegiance' in Arabic, without God, or is this another sign of the way that this 'new America' is headed?

This is not the 1st time that a school in America has required its' students to recite the pledge in Arabic and replaced 'God' with 'Allah' as shared in the story excerpted below from Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs.

“Thanks to the illegal invasion and the concept of ‘celebrate diversity,’ English is becoming a foreign language in America,” one critic wrote on the local newspaper’s website.

A writer who claimed to be an American of Arab Christian ancestry said he, too, was offended by what happened. “The Pledge of Allegiance isn’t a ‘salute’ to America,” he wrote. “It’s a promise to be loyal to it. Part of that loyalty should be to learn English and integrating into our culture.”

Based on the comments made by the student body president, it appears the Arabic recitation was less about celebrating a foreign language and more about stirring up trouble.

In my most recent book, “God Less America,” I illustrate how the nation’s public schools have been turned into indoctrination centers. Teachers are preaching a liberal ideology. Our schoolhouses have become places where Christianity is marginalized and Islam is given accommodation.

“Thanks to the illegal invasion and the concept of ‘celebrate diversity,’ English is becoming a foreign language in America,” one critic wrote on the local newspaper’s website.

A writer who claimed to be an American of Arab Christian ancestry said he, too, was offended by what happened.

“The Pledge of Allegiance isn’t a ‘salute’ to America,” he wrote. “It’s a promise to be loyal to it. Part of that loyalty should be to learn English and integrating into our culture.”

Based on the comments made by the student body president, it appears the Arabic recitation was less about celebrating a foreign language and more about stirring up trouble.

In my most recent book, “God Less America,” I illustrate how the nation’s public schools have been turned into indoctrination centers. Teachers are preaching a liberal ideology. Our schoolhouses have become places where Christianity is marginalized and Islam is given accommodation.
- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/03/another-public-school-reciting-the-pledge-of-allegiance-in-arabic-one-nation-under-allah.html/#sthash.8bzFVfpg.dpuf

Below from Right Wing News.:

Shockingly–or maybe not so, considering how left-wing our education establishment is–the school’s president of the student assembly and senior class president, Andrew Zink, insisted that saying the pledge in Arabic is “the right thing to do.”

This is what our kids are being taught, folks.

Unsurprisingly, this same school was already mired in a scandal when it allowed rampant anti-Semitism to go about unchecked. The school was even sued for its failure to stop the blatant hate against Jews. And now it is forcing kids to say the Pledge in Arabic? Yeah. Not surprising at all.

THIS is your government schools, folks.

The school in New York isn’t the only one that has forced kids to recite the Pledge in Arabic. Back in 2013 a Fort Collins, Colorado school also became mired in the Pledge in Arabic.

http://www.allnewspipeline.com/School_Pledge_In_Arabic_Substitutes_Allah_For_God.php


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on April 05, 2015, 06:36:18 am
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/metro/20150223-islamic-tribunal-in-dallas-draws-criticism-and-clients.ece
Islamic tribunal in Dallas draws criticism and clients
2/23/15

An Islamic tribunal, launched in Dallas last year to settle civil disputes among the growing Muslim population, is drawing quarrels over its use of Shariah law.

Opponents fear it would open the door to extreme practices and corporal punishment linked to Shariah law in certain Muslim-majority countries. Still others argue it would replace the U.S. Constitution.

But organizers say the panel of arbitrators issues nonbinding decisions on matters such as business disputes and religious divorces. They note its parallels with Jewish rabbinical courts and Catholic tribunals.

The very word “Shariah” invokes backlash from those who don’t understand it and use it as a “catch phrase for fear-mongering against Islam and Muslims,” said Hadi Jawad, a Dallas businessman and a Muslim.

Tribunals are used in his native Pakistan. “The court system was so clogged and inefficient, it was a handy means to settle conflicts,” Jawad said. “There was usually a handful of judges experienced in Islamic law who could readily handle conflicts.”

Tea party activist Jerry Roehrig wants the North Texas tribunal disbanded.

“I am concerned about corporal punishment and how Shariah law handles women and non-Muslims,” he said. Shariah law “puts itself above our constitution. We can’t have that or we lose the country.”

Criticism also comes amid backlash blaming all Muslims for violence of the Islamic State, known as ISIS. Many U.S. Muslim groups say ISIS is “un-Islamic” and not a state.

In Irving, Mayor Beth Van Duyne jumped into the controversy after reports that the court was on the grounds of a large mosque there. In a Facebook post, she said the city had nothing to do with the tribunal and that she was trying to understand how it worked. She said if basic rights are being violated, “I will not stand idle, and will fight with every fiber of my being against this action.”

The court uses a conference room in a northeast Dallas law office, where one of the judges works. During a visit there, that judge, Taher el-Badawi, said the tribunal has settled about two dozen cases, mostly of divorcing couples.

“Our community really needs an Islamic tribunal to solve problems,” he said. “And we save money and save time for all the community.”

Managing the cultural diversity within the U.S. Muslim community can be challenging, the organizers said.

About 2 out of 3 U.S. Muslims is foreign-born, according a Pew Research Center study from 2011. No single racial or ethnic identity applies to more than 30 percent of the Muslim-American population, Pew said.


That’s reflected in the tribunal. El-Badawi has a law degree from his native Egypt and a master’s in international law from Southern Methodist University. The two other judges are Lebanon-born Imam Moujahed Bakhach of the Islamic Association of Tarrant County, and Pakistan-born, British-raised Imam Zia ul-Haque Sheikh of the Islamic Center of Irving.

Their website — Islamictribunal.org — says: “Experienced judges ready to fight for you,” and “Great advisors solve problems.”

Consultations are free, but a full panel ruling costs $600, el-Badawi said. Hearings take place at the Dallas offices or in conference rooms at some of the nearly 60 mosques in North Texas.

As the controversy has brewed, Imam Zia clarified in a written statement: “These religious tribunals ... do not attempt to impose any belief system upon any individual and work in compliance with State of Texas and U.S. law under the United States Constitution.”

In Arabic, Shariah means “path to water.” It is a personal moral code and religious law, scholars say. It covers issues ranging from dietary restrictions to divorces to punishment for stealing and killing.

Some associate Shariah law with corporal punishment, such as hand amputation for theft, which is a rare practice in other countries, said Alia Salem, executive director of the DFW chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations..

Most scholars, especially in the West, believe such mutilation isn’t “dispensing the laws properly,” Salem said. “There is huge controversy in the Muslim world with regard to that type of punishment.”

Robert A. Hunt, director of global theological education at SMU’s Perkins School of Theology, lived in Muslim-dominated Malaysia for seven years and is an Islam specialist.

Religious court rulings must be consistent with U.S. law, Hunt said. “I’ve researched this carefully, and I know of no case where the judge has ruled on Shariah, as opposed to American law,” he said.

A 2013 report from the Pew center supports that statement. “Disputes over the laws of various religious traditions have occasionally made their way into U.S. civil courts,” it says, “but the Supreme Court consistently has ruled that judges and other government officials may not interpret religious doctrine or rule on theological matters.”

In the U.S. Catholic church, there are nearly 200 diocesan tribunals that handle 15,000 to 20,000 marriage annulments yearly, Pew said. Many Orthodox Jews use rabbinical courts for religious divorces or to resolve business conflicts under Jewish law, known as halakhah, Pew noted.

The 2013 Pew study found no Shariah courts in the U.S. at that time. But imams have long served as voluntary mediators at U.S. mosques.

All the same, a bill proposed in the Texas legislature by Rep. Jeff Leach, R-Plano, would prohibit family court rulings based on foreign legal codes. The bill doesn’t target any one religion, an office staff member said. The National Conference of State Legislatures said there are now seven similar laws in other states.

In North Texas, most tribunal decisions have been done for Muslim immigrants.

El-Badawi said in one case a Christian woman considering divorce from her Muslim husband sought assistance. “They didn’t take our decision, but at least they felt secure in coming to us,” he said.

Women who are reluctant to go to a tribunal of men can meet first with a female counselor. El-Badawi said he would welcome a woman as a tribunal member if she is trained in Islamic law.

Salem said she went to Imam Moujahed, a certified mediator, a few years ago for a religious divorce. She then went to a civil court for the legal divorce under U.S. law.

Moujahed, who is one of the tribunal judges, said he counsels men to view women as equals. “In some cultures, the man is like a God and the wife has to be submissive. This is not Islamic. The wife is a partner.”

Moujahed also tells fellow Muslims: “Get out of your cocoon. Meet your neighbor.”

His own message to those of other faiths: “Please, just be fair-minded and ask if you don’t understand. We need better understanding of those of different faiths.”

DEVELOPING: There’s a Cowboys vs. Muslims Showdown Brewing in Texas [DETAILS]

A growing number of Texans are organizing a civil revolt against the rise and over-reaching influence of Shariah law in their state.

Ever since it was announced that a Muslim Tribunal court was forming in Irving, Texas, tension has been mounting between the local Muslim community and city government officials who recently approved a bill that addressed the influence of the Islamic mediation panel.

That tension is finally coming to a head as large groups from both sides gathered at the last meeting to voice either their support or displeasure over the bill.

While Muslims and leftists in the community promised a heavy turnout at the council meeting on the night of Thursday, April 2, a “patriot group” coordinated through Facebook to ensure an equally heavy turnout of community members in support of the bill.

The mayor of Irving, Beth Van Duyne, has been at the forefront of the legal battle thus far, leading the way in passing the bill and since taking the heat for it.

“Recent events have put me under attack and I need your help now! Stand with me to help me fight for conservative values and the Constitution,” Van Duyne said in a statement on her Facebook page.

While the mayor said most of the attacks have been coming from the liberal media, the Islamic Center in Irving is reported to be drawing its own ire in the form of threatening letters, emails and phone calls.

But local law enforcement looked into these threats and described them more as “rude” than threatening (H/T Bare Naked Islam).

And while Texas State Rep. Jeff Leach said that the new bill will help address the “problem” of the Muslim Tribunal, the bill itself does not reference Islam, Shariah or any religion, according to Mayor Van Duyne.

Liberals and the media are trying to strip religious freedoms from Christians in Indiana, they are seemingly willing to fight just as hard to not only preserve but also expand the rights of Muslims elsewhere.

Share this post on Facebook if you stand with Texas and think there’s no place for Shariah law in America.

http://conservativetribune.com/cowboys-vs-muslims-showdown/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on June 26, 2015, 06:36:45 am
Shock Poll: 51% of U.S. Muslims Want Sharia; 25% Okay with Violence Against Americans

The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that should give all Americans pause. The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam. A full majority of 51% “agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.” A full 25% of those polled agreed that “violence against Americans here in the United States can be justified as part of the global jihad.” For those who don’t know, Sharia Law is nothing less than the Nazi-ification of a religion. Sharia authorizes murder against non-believers who won’t convert, horrific oppression of women, the execution of gays, the extermination of Jews, and the beheading of anyone who draws Muhammad. Currently anywhere from 3 million to 7 million Muslims live in America.   

MORE: http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/06/24/shock-poll-51-of-american-muslims-want-sharia-25-okay-with-violence-against-americans/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on July 10, 2015, 09:06:50 am
Saudi Prince Pledges $32 Billion On The Islamization Of America

Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, a senior member of the Saudi monarchy, says he’ll pledge his $32 billion to advance the islamization of America.

The Saudis have spent billions already. 80% of the mosques  built in America are Saudi funded. Islamic groups working to impose the sharia are largely funded by the Saudis. We can look forward to 32 billion more of the “kingdom’s brand of Islam, while censoring criticism of Islam.”

And it’s not just the media that is on the receiving end of this blood money, but also Muslim Brotherhood fronts like CAIR, which spend millions whining about how lucrative the “islamophobia” business is. As if …the Saudis have been wildly successful so far.

Wikileaks has begun releasing a trove of documents — half a million cables and other documents from the Saudi Foreign Ministry. Wikileaks declares, “Media is not ‘controlled by Jews’ but by Saudi Arabia: media loyalties purchased around the world.” Notice how this wikileaks release has garnered little press.

Alwaleed says he will model his endowment on the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, only with a twist: Much of his philanthropic work will help “foster cultural understanding” of Islam in America and the West.

That means promoting the kingdom’s brand of Islam, while censoring criticism of Islam.

Published reports and books reveal Alwaleed already has pledged millions to radical Muslim Brotherhood front groups that have a secret plan to Islamize America and spread Shariah law throughout the West. These pro-jihad groups can now count on a massive and virtually endless infusion of cash to their war chests. source

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=34021


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on July 20, 2015, 07:41:16 pm
Seattle Mayor Proposes Offering Sharia Law-Compliant Home Loans for Muslims

The mayor of Seattle and his housing committee have unveiled a plan to increase housing in the city, with a portion of the plan proposing the offering of Sharia law-compliant loans for Muslim residents.

Among the number of ideas offered to make housing more affordable for Seattle residents is a segment that addresses Muslim beliefs, as Sharia law forbids usury for its adherents.

“For our low—and moderate—income Muslim neighbors who follow Sharia law—which prohibits the payment of interest or fees for loans of money—there are limited options for financing a home,” the proposed plan reads. “Some Muslims are unable to use conventional mortgage products due to religious convictions.”

“The City will convene lenders, housing nonprofits and community leaders to explore the best options for increasing access to Sharia-compliant loan products to help these residents become homeowners in Seattle,” it says.

Arsalan Bukhari, chapter executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, told the Puget Sound Business Journal that he believes that there are approximately two hundred Seattle residents who identify as Muslim that avoid taking out home loans because of their religion.

“[T]hey don’t want to pay interest,” he said.

Mayor Ed Murray mentioned the proposal at a recent press conference, which will go to city counsel for consideration.

“We will work to develop new tools for Muslims who are prevented from using conventional mortgage products due to their religious beliefs,” he said.

http://christiannews.net/2015/07/20/seattle-mayor-proposes-offering-sharia-law-compliant-home-loans-for-muslims/

Seattle will burn one day soon...

(http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/c1172/figures/tacoma.gif)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on August 06, 2015, 05:59:45 pm
Obama Alters U.S. Oath Of Allegiance In Compliance With Islamic Law

The Obama administration recently made changes to the Oath of Allegiance to the United States in a manner very conducive to Sharia, or Islamic law.

On July 21, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced some “modifications” to the Oath of Allegiance which immigrants must take before becoming naturalized.

The original oath required incoming citizens to declare that they will “bear arms on behalf of the United States” and “perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States” when required by the law.

Now the USCIS says that “A candidate [to U.S. citizenship] may be eligible to exclude these two clauses based on religious training and belief or a conscientious objection.”

The new changes further add that new candidates “May be eligible for [additional?] modifications based on religious training and belief, or conscientious objection arising from a deeply held moral or ethical code.”

These changes serve incoming Islamic supremacists especially well.  For, while Islamic law allows Muslims to feign loyalty to non-Muslim “infidel” authorities, it bans Muslims from living up to the pretense by actually fighting or killing fellow Muslims on behalf of a non-Muslim entity, such as the United States.

The perfectly fitting story of Nidal Hassan—the U.S. army major and “observant Muslim who prayed daily” but then turned murderer—comes to mind and is illustrative.

A pious Muslim, Hasan seemed a “regular American,” even if he was leading a double life—American Army major and psychiatrist by day, financial supporter of jihadi groups and associate of terrorists by night.  However, when time came for this American soldier to “bear arms on behalf of the United States”—to quote the original Oath of Allegiance—against fellow Muslims, things got ugly: he went on a shooting spree in Fort Hood, killing thirteen Americans, including one pregnant woman in 2009.

Much of Hasan’s behavior is grounded in the Islamic doctrine of Loyalty and Enmity.  According to this essential teaching, Muslims must always be loyal to Islam and fellow Muslims while having enmity for all non-Islamic things and persons.

However, whenever Muslims find themselves under the authority of non-Islamic institutions and persons, they are permitted to feign loyalty—even to the point of cursing Islam and pretending to have abandoned it—with one caveat: Muslims must never take up arms on behalf of “infidels” against fellow Muslims.  In other words, their loyalty to non-Muslims must be skin deep.

Many are the verses in the Koran that support this divisive doctrine (3:28, 4:89, 4:144, 9:23, and 58:22; the latter simply states that true Muslims do not befriend non-Muslims—“even if they be their fathers, sons, brothers, or kin”).

Most germane is Koran 3:28: “Let believers not take for friends and allies infidels rather than believers: and whoever does this shall have no relationship left with Allah—unless you but guard yourselves against them, taking precautions.”

The words translated here as “guard” and “precaution” are derived from the Arabic word taqu, from the trilateral root w-q-y—the same root that gives us the word taqiyya, the Islamic doctrine that permits Muslims to deceive non-Muslims whenever under their authority.

Ibn Kathir (d. 1373), author of one of the most authoritative commentaries on the Koran, explains taqiyya in the context of verse 3:28 as follows: “Whoever at any time or place fears … evil [from non-Muslims] may protect himself through outward show.”  As proof of this, he quotes Muhammad’s close companion Abu Darda, who said, “Let us grin in the face of some people while our hearts curse them.”[1]

Muhammad ibn Jarir at-Tabari (d. 923), author of another standard commentary on the Koran, interprets verse 3:28 as follows:

If you [Muslims] are under their [non-Muslims’] authority, fearing for yourselves, behave loyally to them with your tongue while harboring inner animosity for them … [know that] God has forbidden believers from being friendly or on intimate terms with the infidels rather than other believers—except when infidels are above them [in authority]. Should that be the case, let them act friendly towards them while preserving their religion.[2]

And therein lies the limit of taqiyya: when the deceit, the charade begins to endanger the lives of fellow Muslims—whom, as we have seen, deserve first loyalty—it is forbidden. As al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri puts it in his treatise on Loyalty and Enmity, Muslims may pretend to be friendly and loyal to non-Muslims, so long as they do “not undertake any initiative to support them [non-Muslims], commit sin, or enable [them] through any deed or killing or fighting against Muslims” (The Al Qaeda Reader, p. 75).

Thus the idea that Nidal Hasan might be deployed to a Muslim country (Iraq or Afghanistan) was his “worst nightmare.”   When he realized that he was about to be deployed, he became “very upset and angry.”  The thought that he might injure or kill Muslims “weighed heavily on him.” He also counseled a fellow Muslim not to join the U.S. Army, since “Muslims shouldn’t kill Muslims.”

Hassan is not the only Muslim to expose his disloyalty when pushed into fighting fellow Muslims on behalf of the United States.

In 2010, Naser Abdo, another Muslim soldier who joined the U.S. Army, demanded to be discharged on the claim that he was a “conscientious objector whose devotion to Islam has suffered since he took an oath to defend the United States against all enemies.”  The army agreed, but while processing him, officials found child pornography on his government-issued computer and recommended that he be court-martialed.  Abdo went AWOL and later tried to carry out a terrorist attack on a restaurant with the use of weapons of mass destruction.

And in April 2005, another Muslim serving in the U.S. Army, Hasan Akbar, was convicted of murder for killing two American soldiers and wounding fourteen in a grenade attack in Kuwait: “He launched the attack because he was concerned U.S. troops would kill fellow Muslims in Iraq.”

In short, the first loyalty of any “American Muslim” who follows the Koran is to fellow Muslims, regardless of their nationality—and not to American “infidels,” even if they be their longtime neighbors whom they daily smiled to (see here for examples).  Hence why American Muslim Tarik Shah, who was arrested for terrorist-related charges, once boasted: “I could be joking and smiling [with non-Muslims] and then cutting their throats in the next second”—reminiscent of the aforementioned quote by Muhammad’s companion.

Now, in direct compliance with Islamic law, the Obama administration has made it so that no Muslim living in America need ever worry about having to defend her—including against fellow Muslims or jihadis.

Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, a Judith Friedman Rosen Writing Fellow at the Middle East Forum and a CBN News contributor. He is the author of Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians (2013) and The Al Qaeda Reader (2007).

Notes:

http://www.rightsidenews.com/us/islam-in-america/obama-alters-u-s-oath-of-allegiance-in-compliance-with-islamic-law/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on September 05, 2015, 05:44:54 am
Parents Upset that Middle Schoolers Assigned to Write 'Allah is the Only God'
"A Christian child should not be made to write that."


 Parents at a middle school in Spring Hill, Tennessee, just outside of Nashville, are upset that their children have spent three weeks studying Islam and were assigned to write the Shahada profession of the Islamic faith: "Allah is the only god." Making the situation worse, parents said the teacher skipped over the section on Christianity.

Though the parents understand that a thorough study of history will undoubtedly cover religions from all over the world, they don't understand why so much time is being spent on this one. Plus, the class is delving into learning the specifics of the Five Pillars of Islam and thus causing parents to wonder if that constitutes teaching religion in schools.

“From a religion point of view, if the schools are going to be teaching religion in history, they need to teach them all equally," parent Brandee Porterfield told The Columbia Daily Herald. "For them to spend three weeks on Islam after having skipped Christianity, it seems to be that they are making a choice about which religion to discuss.”

Another parent, Joy Ellis, said she was aware her child was studying Islam but as far as having to write the Shahada, she said, "To me, a Christian child should not be made to write that."

“I honestly don’t want my child learning about Islam at all, but if they’ve got to learn about it, I would like for them to learn about the historical aspects of it and definitely nothing about the religion. I don’t want her writing ‘Allah is the only god,’” Ellis added.

But according to school officials, the class is just following Tennessee state standards adopted by Gov. Bill Haslem. Though he signed a bill against Common Core in May, the new TN Core standards are said to be very similar to the controversial curriculum.

The middle school supervisor for Maury County Public Schools Dr. Jan Hanvey stated that these topics have been covered in the area schools for 31 years and said that the three weeks of study doesn't only focus on the religion but the culture, economics, geography and government around the religion. She assures that only one day is spent talking about Islam and students will also get to Buddhism and Hinduism later on.

Hanvey also stated that the chapter on Christianity wasn't skipped intentionally, but put off for another time, when the history class will study America and the Age of Exploration.

Hanvey blames recent events for causing the public to "fear" Islam, much like the way, she said, people feared the Japanese during World War II. “It’s hard to separate religion from history,” Hanvey said. “It’s teaching about religion. We are not trying to convert.”

In a statement, Spring Hill Middle School Principal Shanda Sparrow acknowledged that perhaps the school did "not do the best job" in warning parents of sensitive subjects that their children were scheduled to learn. To promote an "open dialogue," a parent-teacher meeting is set up for later in September to address the concern.

Maury County Schools Director Chris Marczak wrote a defense on Facebook saying the assignment was to teach the religion to students, not convert them, nor "to endorse one religion over another or indoctrinate." He added:

    I encourage all Maury County parents to be their child’s first and main teacher. It is our job as parents of our own children to instill in them the beliefs of our individual households. It’s important that we establish a good working relationship with our children’s teachers and schools so that when there are questions or concerns, teachers and principals are the first line of asking. If we are truly going to Grow Maury County together, then we need to openly talk and discuss about what we want to emphasize in our county. I encourage you to talk with your children, talk with your teachers, and talk with your principals. We are here to help your children be prepared for Life.

A photograph of one of the assignments shows one child's disapproval:

The same issue was raised earlier this year in Florida when high school students were assigned to recite the Five Pillars of Islam and make their own prayer rug. This story also included missing sections of Christianity from the textbook.

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/parents-upset-middle-schoolers-assigned-write-allah-only-god


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on September 16, 2015, 08:56:28 am
Outrage As US Public School Students Forced To Recite ‘Allah Is The Only God’

Public School students forced to recite ‘Allah is the only god’

“But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.” 1 Corinthians 8:6 (KJV)

Amid a new report of Islamic indoctrination in public schools, the American Center for Law and Justice is fighting back with a petition drive that already has garnered 120,000 signatures. Earlier this year, public-school students in Madison, Wisconsin, were given an assignment to “pretend you are Muslim,” while students in Florida were instructed to “recite the Five Pillars of Islam as a prayer, make Islamic prayer rugs and perform other Muslim rituals,” ACLJ said Monday.

Nearly 120,000 people have signed ACLJ’s petition demanding a halt to such teaching. “What if your child or grandchild’s public school forced them to write out the Shahada – the Islamic conversion creed – while having skipped Christianity?” the organization asked.

“What if your child’s study guide had a section called ‘Origins of Islam’ that included statements such as, ‘Around the age of 40, the angel Gabriel told Muhammad that he was to be a prophet of Allah.’ “Stated as fact, not belief,” the ACLJ said.

The Columbia Daily Herald in Middle Tennessee reported details of the allegations. In the Maury County school district, the paper reported parent Brandee Porterfield said her daughter “brought home school materials containing the Five Pillars of Islam.”
But the school skipped the textbook’s section on Christianity.

School officials explained, she told the Herald, that Christianity was not part of the state’s standards, so it wasn’t covered.

“I have a big problem with that. From a historical point of view, that’s a lot of history these kids are missing,” Porterfield told the newspaper. “Also, for them to spend three weeks on Islam after having skipped Christianity, it seems to be that they are making a choice about which religion to discuss.”

She said her concerns were about her seventh-grade daughter being taught the “Shahada,” the profession of Islamic faith.

“From a religion point of view, if the schools are going to be teaching religion in history, they need to teach them all equally,” she said. The ACLJ reported called it “Islamic indoctrination right here in our schools.”

The organization said Maury County school officials admitted they were addressing “some sensitive topics” in class and there appeared to be some “confusion.”

“That’s outrageous,” ACLJ said. “The indoctrination of students with the precepts of converting to Islam and forcing them to recite ‘Allah is the only god’ aren’t ‘sensitive topics’; it’s unconstitutional.

“Imagine the outcry from the ACLU, Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), and other leftist and angry atheist organizations if a study guide states, ‘Jesus is the Son of God,’ and forced children to recite the Lord’s Prayer.”
Now, Sekulow’s organization said it is taking action.

“We’re in direct contact with a number of parents and concerned citizens, we’re taking on new clients, and preparing critical demand letters and open records requests to these schools and school districts,” the group said.

“It is a clear constitutional principle that public education may not indoctrinate young minds into a religion. Teachers and schools may teach what different faith traditions believe and how that has affected world history and geography. But a school cannot censor Christianity and promote Islam.”

The Daily Herald reported Jan Hanvey, a middle school supervisor for Maury County Public Schools, said the curriculum has covered the subject for decades, and Buddhism and Hinuism also are covered.
She told the newspaper the chapter on Christianity was not skipped but was being delayed.

The newspaper cited state advisories that called for seventh-grade social studies to begin with the Islamic world and then move to Africa. The “Age of Exploration” follows, which continues into eighth grade.

Hanvey told the newspaper Christianity is discussed in the “Age of Exploration,” partly because religious persecution is one of the reasons for a search for a new world.

Fox News reported Maury County Director of Schools Chris Marczak said his teachers “work together to make sure that our students are learning what is expected through the Tennessee academic standards.”

“For this last section on the Islamic World this past week, our educators had students complete an assignment that had an emphasis on Islamic faith,” he said. “The assignment covered some sensitive topics that are of importance to Islamic religion and caused some confusion around whether we are asking students to believe in or simply understand the religion.”

WND reported earlier this year teachers and administrators at a Pennsylvania school district attended a training session on Islam and Arabic culture at taxpayer expense.

The workshop in the town of Lebanon was led by a former district Arabic translator, Mohamed Omar, who took time off from his Department of Human Services job in Philadelphia “to share his knowledge of Islam with the staff,” the Lebanon Daily News reported.

“I think this is the first time ever in the United States that a school district goes to a mosque,” mosque founder Hamid Housni told the Daily News. “Usually a representative of a mosque goes somewhere. We don’t have words to explain to you how we appreciate that. This is very, very special.”

In 2006, WND reported students in Nyssa, Oregon, were learning Muslim prayers and dressing as Muslims.

Another assignment was to learn the Five Pillars of Islam, study the Muslim holiday of Ramadan and listen to guest speakers, including an American Muslim who came dressed in her religious costume to talk about her Quran.

A resulting lawsuit regarding the curriculum was similar to a previous case in which the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals eventually ruled such indoctrination was permissible as “cultural education.” source

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=35544


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on September 28, 2015, 06:22:58 am
Most U.S. Muslims would trade Constitution for Shariah

...According to a local newspaper report, Omar Ahmad, a founder of CAIR, told a conference hall packed with California Muslims in July 1998 that Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. ...A poll...in May 2015 by the Center for Security Policy showed that 51 percent of American Muslims preferred that they should have their own Shariah courts outside of the legal system ruled by the U.S. Constitution.   

http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/poll-most-u-s-muslims-would-trade-constitution-for-shariah/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on October 03, 2015, 07:14:34 am
Imam of Oregon's Biggest Mosque Told Muslims to Kill Americans

 A few years ago the Oregonian's Helen Jung was whining about how the FBI was being mean to the nice Imam and his mosque.

    The unexplained actions are aggravating the FBI's already poor relationship with the mosque and fueling fear and frustration among Muslims that their house of worship appears to be once again in the government's cross hairs...

    In Oregon, Masjed As-Saber stands out for its traditional focus and charismatic imam, who urges worshippers to stay true to the vast library of strict Islamic teachings, down to the conviction that men and women shouldn't trim their eyebrows.

Why that poor man. The FBI is persecuting him just because he opposes eyebrow trimming.



    Kariye briefly mentioned in one sermon his concerns that nonorganic food is threatening people's health.

Organic food... and murdering Americans. Why this Imam is so progressive.

    The imam of Portland's biggest mosque collected money from worshippers after 9/11, sending the Portland Seven to Afghanistan to fight against coalition forces, the U.S. Department of Justice alleges in its fight to deport the imam.

    As religious leader of Masjed As-Saber, Kariye told several members of the plot that "Muslims should fight with fellow Muslim brothers of Afghanistan against Americans" and that this combat was a "righteous fight ... legitimate jihad," Justice Department lawyers wrote in an exhibit filed earlier this month in the immigration case.

Oregon clearly needs more Somalis and their Muslim scholars. Because of the eyebrow trimming and the terrorism.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/260322/imam-oregons-biggest-mosque-told-muslims-kill-daniel-greenfield


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on October 22, 2015, 06:27:02 pm
VIDEO: Muslim Prayers Take Over Streets of Downtown Los Angeles

http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/10/video-muslim-prayers-take-over-streets-of-downtown-los-angeles/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 05, 2015, 03:47:50 pm
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/it-begins-hamtramck-first-american-city-to-elect-a-muslim-majority-council/
IT BEGINS: HAMTRAMCK FIRST AMERICAN CITY TO ELECT A MUSLIM-MAJORITY COUNCIL
Hamtramck City Council in Michigan has done something never before achieved in the 239 years of the American nation. They have elected a Muslim-majority City Council.

11/5/15

MULTICULTURALISM IS THE DEATH OF ANY NATION’S IDENTITY AND SOVEREIGNTY

Hamtramck City Council in Michigan has done something never before achieved in the 239 years of the American nation. They have elected a Muslim-majority City Council. Voters gave Abu Musa and Anam Miah another term in office. Saad Almasmari was elected for the first time. Now four of the six City Council members will be of Muslim faith.

“We are very proud and we are very happy for that achievement, what we have done in this city, for our city,” said Jamal Alturki, a voter.

“I think that sends a message not only to Hamtramck but throughout the region that people want their representation in offices,” Miah said.

Years from now, after America has fallen and is shackled to the demonic Sharia Law, when historians looks back to see where it all begin, Hamtramck will be the “ground zero” that they will point to. One of the things that makes America so great – the ability for the people to elect the government of their choosing – is, ironically, also her greatest weakness. When the Irish and Germans came here in the early 1900’s, they provided the labor backbone to build our infrastructure and also became our cities firefighters and policemen. When the Jews came here, America became the financial and movie capital of the world. Every ethnic people group that arrived here legally has assimilated themselves into the American culture and made us a better, stronger and more prosperous nation. Not so with the Muslims.

MUSLIMS DO NOT ASSIMILATE INTO THEIR HOST NATIONS, THEY INFILTRATE UNTIL THEIR NUMBERS REACH A TIPPING POINT

The laughable assertions of Kenyan-born Barack Hussein Obama aside, Muslims as an ethnic group have never made a contribution to American society that was purely for the benefit of the American people. Why? Because there is not a Muslim on the face of the Earth, if they are a good Muslim, that has any desire at all to fit in and assimilate into the culture of their host nation. Their Qu’Ran tells them to seize and claim all foreign land for Allah.

UK ISLAMIST LEADER: ISLAM WILL DOMINATE AMERICA:

They’ve been called “megaphone jihadists,” radical Muslims who take to the streets of Western cities demanding Islamic sharia law.

What you just watched in this video is not “radical” Islam, it is just Islam. The goal of Islam, all Islam, is world domination and conquest so they can implement the Sharia. Today, it’s a Muslim-majority City Council, and the liberal nuts clap and cheer our misguided and misplaced “diversity”. But tomorrow, it is a Muslim-majority Congress and Senate with the US Constitution thrown in the trash and the Qu’ran and Sharia Law in it’s place. To get it, all they have to do is continue to breed in large numbers, and they are, then vote themselves into office, which they are now doing.

Ronald Reagan tried to warn us to remain vigilant all those years ago, but somehow, even in the aftermath of 9/11, we have failed to heed his warning:

“I DON’T THINK YOU CAN OVERSTATE THE IMPORTANCE THAT THE RISE OF ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISM WILL HAVE TO THE REST OF THE WORLD IN THE CENTURY AHEAD-ESPECIALLY IF, AS SEEMS POSSIBLE, ITS MOST FANATICAL ELEMENTS GET THEIR HANDS ON NUCLEAR AND CHEMICAL WEAPONS AND THE MEANS TO DELIVER THEM AGAINST THEIR ENEMIES.”  – RONALD REAGAN

In 2015, the greatest threat to world peace comes from Islamic terrorism. At this very moment, England, Germany, France and the Netherlands are under attack from biological jihad. But their main goal, the “big prize”, is the conquest and submission of America to the Sharia.

History will record that the Muslim-majority Hamtramck City Council is that first, successful step.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 17, 2015, 02:13:17 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUoaUgYpok0


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 20, 2015, 01:48:24 am
PARENTS IRATE AFTER STUDENTS TOLD TO SING MUSLIM TUNE
'This is their fight song. Spread Islam now song. Prove that they're right song'


Parents at a California middle school are demanding to know why a teacher had students sing an Islamic “fight song.”

A seventh-grade teacher at Spring View Middle School in Huntington Beach, California, deviated from the district’s official curriculum and had students sing “This Is My Fight Song.” Parent and grandparent Nichole Negron and Susan Negron told KCAL 9 Los Angeles their seventh grader was told to participate in the activity.

“I believe that by singing the song, the children feel comfortable that maybe Allahu is the only god and maybe that they should start following him,” Susan Negron told the network Tuesday. “I’m not OK with that.”

The women only found out about the activity by accident when Negron’s son brought a pamphlet with lyrics home.

“How can we as parents combat against what we don’t know is going on?” the mother asked.

The two women went to the Ocean View school board on Tuesday night looking for answers. The teacher allegedly wanted students to learn about Islam through a “catchy” tune.

The lyrics to “This Is My Fight Song” go as follows:

Like a sandstorm in the desert, sending camels into motion.
Like how a single faith can make a heart open, they might only have one god,
But they can make an explosion.

All those things they have to say, Islam … Allahu’s on the way.
They will preach them loud tonight. Can you hear the voice this time?
This is their fight song. Spread Islam now song. Prove that they’re right song.

Ojaala Ahmed of the Council for American Islamic Relations in Anaheim told the CBS affiliate she wanted to know why the teacher shared the song, given that Islamic radical terror attacks in Paris, France, last Friday killed 129 and injured over 350.

“Especially with the recent attacks ISIS has been doing, knowing that this potentially Islamaphobic backlash might come about, what was the teacher’s intention?” Ahmed asked.

The school district sent an apology to parents and said it would continue looking into the incident, the network reported.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/parents-irate-after-students-told-to-sing-muslim-tune/#8qqSv2fOlophPyPw.99


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 20, 2015, 03:57:56 pm
http://nypost.com/2015/11/19/syrian-community-leader-isis-is-already-in-new-york-city/
11/19/15
Syrian community leader: ISIS is already in America

A leader of New York City’s Syrian community told The Post on Wednesday that ISIS terrorists have “absolutely” sneaked into America by posing as civil-war refugees — and joined sleeper cells just waiting to be activated.

“I believe the terrorists from Syria have been coming into the United States, not only in the past few years, but way before that,” said Aarafat “Ralph” Succar of Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, home of the city’s largest enclave of Syrian immigrants. “I think they’re already at work.”

Succar, a member of the Bay Ridge Community Council, said corruption in his homeland is so rampant that anyone could easily pay bribes and obtain official identification papers bearing a fake name to disguise their real identity.

“You can go to the Syrian government today and say to them, ‘I need a piece of paper that says I’m Tony Caterpillar.’ And they give it to you,” he said.

“These are not forged documents. These are written out by a government employee who needs money, whose family has no food.”

Succar, 57, who immigrated to the United States when he was 10, also noted that “Third World countries, particularly places like Syria, do not have the network of information the United States has.”

“In Syria, there’s no such thing. So when they tell you that [the refugees] are vetted, are you out of your mind?” he said.

Meanwhile, officials in Honduras said Wednesday that five Syrian nationals headed for the United States had been caught with fraudulent ID papers in the capital city of Tegucigalpa, Reuters reported.

The men were detained late Tuesday after arriving from Costa Rica when authorities discovered their Greek passports had been stolen and doctored to replace the photos with pictures of the Syrians.

Mayor Bill de Blasio said Wednesday that “a grand total of eight” Syrian refugees had settled in the city as part of an official State Department program, and City Hall later lowered that number to four, blaming the information mixup on the feds.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 20, 2015, 04:48:22 pm
https://gma.yahoo.com/utah-school-under-fire-asking-students-write-isis-210954316--abc-news-topstories.html
Utah School Under Fire for Asking Students to Write ISIS Propaganda Poster
11/20/15

A Utah school is apologizing after a ninth grade teacher assigned students to draw a propaganda poster for ISIS.

The teacher, who's been on the job for just a few months, gave the in-class assignment to students in her two World Civics classes at Salem Junior High School in Salem, Utah, on Wednesday. About 60 students received the assignment, which required them to create a "neat, colored, professional" poster for the terrorist group, to "help students better understand the goals of terrorist groups and the methods they use to gain support," the assignment read.

The teacher included a note asking students to come forward if they felt uncomfortable with the assignment. None did, Lana Hiskey, a spokeswoman for the Nebo School District where the school is located, told ABC News.

ISIS Threatens to Attack Washington in New Video

'Negative Meaning' Forces School to Rename ISIS Registration

American-Muslim Leaders Say ISIS 'Has Declared War on All of Us'

But some parents did not think the assignment was appropriate, especially after six coordinated terrorist attacks last week in Paris have left 130 dead.

"We shouldn't be talking about how ISIS recruits, we should be discussing the events of what they have caused to figure a way of how to deter that and how to help better the world," Annie Langston, whose daughter received the assignment, told ABC News. "I thought this isn't right, not right now."

The possibility of having to search for ISIS recruiting material on the web at a time when officials are looking to detect potential threats was alarming, Langston said.

The assignment had not been approved by school administrators, Hiskey said, adding that teachers at the school meet each week to discuss best practices.

"That never happened with this one," said Hiskey.

Four parents contacted the school on Thursday to express their concern.

"As soon as the administration heard of this and reviewed the material, they immediately removed the assignment," Hiskey said.

The school contacted the parents of all students in both classes and notified the students that they were not required to complete the assignment, Hiskey said. The teacher said she is sorry about the assignment, according to Hiskey. She is still teaching at the high school.

"She did this innocently, she's a naive young teacher," Hiskey said. "She wants to do the right thing."


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on December 08, 2015, 11:18:06 pm
Massive Worldwide Support for Sharia Law Among Global Muslim Community

In the aftermath of the uproar caused by Donald Trump’s press release “calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on,” the Pew Research Center released some truly astonishing polling data on the support among Muslims worldwide for Sharia law.

Everywhere we look around the globe, there are substantial—and generally dominant—percentages of Muslims who favor making Sharia the official law in their country.

Have a look at these numbers:

(http://canadafreepress.com/images/uploads/rayne120815-1.jpg)

rest: http://canadafreepress.com/article/77349


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on December 11, 2015, 03:38:17 pm
http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/First-planeload-of-163-Syrian-refugees-arrives-in-Canada-437032
Canada welcomes first planeload of Syrian refugees

Aircraft carrying 163 Syrian refugees touches down in Toronto just before midnight on Thursday and will be followed by a second military airlift to Montreal on Saturday.

After months of promises and weeks of preparation, the first Canadian government planeload of Syrian refugees landed in Toronto on Thursday, aboard a military aircraft met by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Trudeau was elected to a surprise majority in October promising to accept more refugees more quickly than the previous Conservative government.

"This is a wonderful night, where we get to show not just a planeload of new Canadians what Canada is all about, we get to show the world how to open our hearts and welcome in people who are fleeing extraordinarily difficult situations," Trudeau told airport workers and volunteers standing by to meet the refugees.

Trudeau's Liberal government scaled back the number of Syrian migrants it will accept by year end after the attacks in Paris sparked concern that the election promise to bring in 25,000 by December 31 would not allow enough time for security checks.

The plane carrying 163 Syrian refugees touched down in Toronto just before midnight on Thursday and will be followed by a second military airlift to Montreal on Saturday. Trudeau has said 10,000 will be resettled by the end of the year and a further 15,000 by the end of February.

As Trudeau met the military aircraft amid tight security at a special terminal, privately sponsored Syrian refugees were arriving on commercial flights at Toronto's main terminal, greeted by sponsors and ordinary Canadians who had come to the airport to welcome the much-anticipated newcomers.

"They are very tired, but they are happy and hopeful," said Soriya Dasir, a worker with Abraham Festival, a group that sponsored a single mother and three children who had been living in a camp in Jordan for two years, as she escorted them past waiting media.

Toronto's airport authority urged Canadians not to come to the airport to greet the refugees or drop off donations, saying: "We're so proud that our community wants to help, but such a response would be very overwhelming for those arriving."

The request did not deter Shai Reef, 20, who held up a sign that read: "Welcome to Canada" in Arabic.

"I'm here to show my solidarity for and support of the Syrian people going through genocide in Syria," Reef said. "As Jews, we were also locked out, I know what it feels like."

Toronto's mayor tweeted a welcome, while the Toronto Star, the country's largest newspaper, covered its front page with a "Welcome to Canada" banner headline in English and Arabic, along with an article explaining Canadian weather, ice hockey and slang.

The reception in Canada contrasted sharply with that of the neighboring United States, where fear of Syrian refugees following the deadly November 13 Paris attacks spurred opposition to allowing them entry. Some US governors said their states would not accept Syrian refugees.

With security concerns, immigration paperwork and the flight's late-night arrival, refugees on the military aircraft were to be put up at a nearby hotel for the night before meeting their sponsors and resettlement agencies on Friday.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on December 12, 2015, 02:22:20 pm
(http://i674.photobucket.com/albums/vv110/zcry/gov/sharia_zpskrxlfyaz.jpg)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on December 16, 2015, 06:22:39 pm
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/understanding-the-muslims-plan-for-world-dominance-through-sharia-law/
12/15/15
WORLD DOMINANCE THROUGH ISLAM AND SHARIA LAW
"I don't think you can overstate the importance that the rise of Islamic fundamentalism will have to the rest of the world in the century ahead-especially if, as seems possible, its most fanatical elements get their hands on nuclear and chemical weapons and the means to deliver them against their enemies." --Ronald Reagan


BY THOSE THAT PRACTICE IT, IT IS CALLED A “RELIGION OF PEACE”. THERE ARE THOSE, HOWEVER, WHO WOULD DISAGREE WITH THAT STATEMENT

“And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.” Genesis 16:12 (KJV)

Some people see the Muslims as an angry, violent people who use the two-fold method of Jihad and Fatah to further their geopolitical plans, and sadly, the vast majority of people both here in America and abroad, remain blissfully ignorant of the ever-swelling tide of Muslim cultural expansion. In this article, we will show you, mostly in their own words and pictures, just exactly what the goal of Islam really is. We will not defame, demean or otherwise say anything that is not true about the position they hold. We will show you their words, photos of them in “action”, and let you make up your mind about what Islam is really all about.

A quick Google images search of the words Islam will dominate gives you quite the eyeful. It shows very quickly photos from around the world of Muslims carrying signs and banners that proclaim things like “freedom can go to hell”, “Islam will dominate the world”, and “Shariah law – the true solution”, as well as many other cute little tag lines. My first take on that is that it doesn’t seem overly friendly.

JIHAD IN AMERICA – THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD DECEPTION

Is this the work of scattered “radical fringe groups”, or is it the views of the majority of Muslims around the world? Well, look at it like this: someone has said that only 1% of Muslims worldwide are Jihadists. Ok, that’s fine, 1% is a small number…until…you realize that at last count there was 1,300,000,000 Muslims worldwide. For those of you who are math challenged that’s about 1.3 billion Muslims. What is 1% of 1.3 billion? It is 10.3 million Muslims that engage in passive or active Jihad.

Since 9/11 there have been an estimated 27,736 deadly terror attacks carried out worldwide, and all by Muslim terrorists. In November of 2015 alone, there was 169 jihad attacks in 30 countries which resulted in 1,455 dead people with 1,706 critically injured. You really need to think about what stats like that mean.

TRAINING LITTLE CHILDREN TO BE JIHADI TERRORISTS FOR ALLAH

Watch this video about a Palestinian kid’s show called “The Children’s Club”. This show is the equivalent for them, of Sesame Street here in the USA…with one big exception. I won’t spoil it for you, but guarantee that it will be quite the eye-opener for you. Remember, this is a national program that is funded by not only their government but partially from our government as well. Watch and learn what is in the “hearts and minds” of Muslims.

THE KORAN VS. THE REST OF THE WORLD

The Muslim “holy” book, the Koran, is filled with words of wisdom on how Muslims should live their lives, and how they should interact with those around them. The following is just a few quotes taken directly from the Koran. Just let the reassuring, calming words of the Prophet Muhammad and his “religion of peace” wash over you like gentle rain from above.

On Interacting with Jews and Christians:
“O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.” Sura 5, verse 51

“And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah DESTROY them; how they are turned away!” Sura 9, verse 30

“And the Jews will not be pleased with you, nor the Christians until you follow their religion. Say: Surely Allah’s guidance, that is the (true) guidance. And if you follow their desires after the knowledge that has come to you, you shall have no guardian from Allah, nor any helper.” Sura 2, verse 120
On Living In Peace With Non-Muslims:

“And KILL them (the unbelievers) wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers.” Sura 2, verse 191

“Let not the believers take the unbelievers for friends rather than believers; and whoever does this, he shall have nothing of (the guardianship of) Allah, but you should guard yourselves against them, guarding carefully; and Allah makes you cautious of (retribution from) Himself; and to Allah is the eventual coming.” Sura 3, verse 28

“And whoever does not believe in Allah and His Apostle, then surely We have prepared burning fire for the unbelievers.” Sura 48, verse 13
The Koran vs. the Holy Bible:

Ok, so the “holy” book that ALL Muslims read everyday, the Koran, commands them, it’s not a just a suggestion, but they are commanded to “kill the unbelievers where they find them”. This is in very sharp contrast to the bible where Jesus says this about unbelievers –

“But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;” Matthew 5:44 (KJV)

So let me ask you this – if you had to have a neighbor whose religion was not your own, would you rather have a Muslim who is commanded to kill YOU, the “unbeliever”, or would you rather have a follower of the Holy Bible who is commanded to love you, pray for you and do good for you even if you are his spiritual opposite?

WAGING WAR VIA BIOLOGICAL JIHAD

We all know the explosive violence of Islamic Jihad, and have seen countless images on the news for the past 3 decades now. But violent Jihad is not the only weapon the Muslims have in their quest to “take over the world”, they also have “biological” Jihad.

THE CHANGING MUSLIM DEMOGRAPHICS AROUND THE WORLD:

Biological Jihad is the Muslim practice of emigrating to every major country around the world, and having as many children as possible. The average number of people in a European Muslim family is 8, with many families having as many as 10 to 14. By increasing the number of Muslim living in any one particular country, they eventually will become the dominant force in that country as their people go in to public life, are elected to prominent positions, and then change the laws of that country to suit the Muslim ideology. Libyan Leader Mu’ammar Al-Qaddafi said it like this:

“WE HAVE 50 MILLION MUSLIMS IN EUROPE. THERE ARE SIGNS THAT ALLAH WILL GRANT ISLAM VICTORY IN EUROPE – WITHOUT SWORDS, WITHOUT GUNS, WITHOUT CONQUESTS. THE FIFTY MILLION MUSLIMS OF EUROPE WILL TURN IT INTO A MUSLIM CONTINENT WITHIN A FEW DECADES.” FROM THE MIDDLE EAST MEDIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE.

So when you see all these stories in 2015 about how hard Obama is pushing Muslim immigration in the United States, you can clearly see how that advances and benefits the Muslim doctrine of Biological Jihad.

“A New York hotel is staking its claim to have invented a new hospitality niche — birth tourism. The Marmara Manhattan offers “an exclusive package for new mothers that wish to give birth in the USA”, with the additional bonus of the newborn child gaining US citizenship. The hotel, which is part of the Turkish hospitality chain, exploits the 14th amendment to the US constitution, which states that all children born on American soil “are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”

In England this started over 20 years ago, now the country is crawling with a Muslim population that is threatening to – LEGALLY – take over because there are almost more Muslims than there are non-Muslims. And when that happens, they simply vote themselves into office, and from there it’s a pretty simple process to – LEGALLY – institute Sharia law.

Just how badly do Muslims wish to takeover this country? It is the fondest desire of their heart to one day see the Muslim flag flying over the White House. Don’t think it could happen? Just look around you – it is already happening.

When the Muslims declared nearly 30 years ago that “we will claim England for Islam”, people laughed, just like people laughed at Hitler in 1932. They said he looked like Charlie Chaplin, and made fun of his freaky little mustache. But no one is laughing now.

Now that you have seen and heard what the Muslim plan for world domination is, I would like to ask you a question. Do you take comfort in the fact that it’s only the “radical” element who thinks this way, and not all Muslims? After all, it’s only a mere 10,300,000 Muslims on the radical fringe, nothing to be alarmed about, right?

Think about that the next time you pass another Muslim school that has just opened in your town, or as you drive past yet another mosque in the downtown area in which you live. And just keeping on saying to yourself, “it’s only the radicals who think like this…it’s only the radicals that think like this”

All 10,600,000 of them.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on December 18, 2015, 09:17:43 am
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/paul-ryan-barack-obama-betray-america-spending-bill/
PAUL RYAN PARTNERS WITH BARACK OBAMA TO BETRAY AMERICA WITH ‘FUNDAMENTAL TRANSFORMATION’ SPENDING BILL
A vote could occur as early as Thursday after midnight, giving lawmakers and the public only one full business day to review the 2,242 page package. The Ryan-Pelosi package represents nothing short of a complete and total betrayal of the American people.

12/17/15

REP. PAUL RYAN’S FIRST MAJOR LEGISLATIVE ACHIEVEMENT IS A TOTAL AND COMPLETE SELL-OUT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MASQUERADING AS AN APPROPRIATIONS BILL.

Too harsh, you say? Let the programs, the spending, and the implications speak for themselves.

EDITOR’S NOTE: NOW YOU KNOW WHY, IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS, WHY MOST OF THE GOP HATES DONALD TRUMP, BECAUSE HE IS GOING TO STOP THE VAST MAJORITY OF THIS NONSENSE. TRUMP HAS NO LOYALTY TO ANY PARTY, HE IS GOING TO DO WHAT MAKES THE BEST BUSINESS SENSE FOR AMERICA. THIS IS WHY TRUMP “MUST BE STOPPED”, HE WILL END THE FREE RIDE.

(1) Ryan’s Omnibus Fully Funds DACA

Though much of the public attention has surrounded the President’s 2014 executive amnesty, the President’s 2012 amnesty quietly continues to churn out work permits and federal benefits for hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. Paul Ryan’s bill funds entirely this 2012 executive amnesty for “DREAMers”—or illegal immigrants who came to the country as minors.

Specifically, Division F of Ryan’s omnibus bill contains no language that would prohibit the use of funds to continue the President’s unconstitutional program. Obama’s executive action, known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), has granted around 700,000 illegal aliens with work permits, as well as the ability to receive tax credits and federal entitlement programs. A recent GAO report documented how this illegal amnesty program for alien youth is, in large part, responsible for the illegal alien minor surge on our southern border.

In 2013, Paul Ryan said that it is his job as a U.S. lawmaker to put himself in the shoes of “the DREAMer who is waiting” and work to find legislative solutions to his or her problems.

(2) Ryan’s Omnibus Funds Sanctuary Cities

Five months ago, 32-year-old Kate Steinle was bleeding to death in her father’s arms. She was gunned down in broad daylight by a five-time deported criminal alien whose presence in the country was the direct result of San Francisco’s refusal to comply with U.S. immigration law—yet Paul Ryan’s omnibus rewards these lawless Sanctuary Cities with federal grants. Division B Title II of Ryan’s omnibus funds various grant programs for the Department of Justice (pages 167, 168, and 169) and contains no language that would restrict the provision of such grants to sanctuary jurisdictions.

In a Congressional hearing, Steinle’s father demanded Congressional action and recalled his daughter’s dying words: “Help me, Dad.”

(3) Ryan’s Omnibus Funds All Refugee Programs

Despite broad support amongst Republican lawmakers for a proposal introduced by

Rep. Brian Babin (R-TX) to halt all refugee resettlement, Ryan’s appropriations bill will fund President Obama’s refugee resettlement operation and will allow for the admission of tens of thousands of refugees with access to federal benefits. Division H Title II of Ryan’s bill contains appropriations of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and contains no language that would restrict the program. Nor are there any restrictions for the program in Division K of Ryan’s bill, which provides funding for the Department of State, which oversees refugee admissions.
Ryan is not one of the 84 cosponsors of Babin’s bill to halt the refugee operation, and he recently told Sean Hannity that he does not support halting resettlement because, “We’re a compassionate country. The refugees laws are important laws.” Similarly, this outcome represents a legislative win for

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), who told Sean Hannity he’d “hate to use” Congress’s power of the purse to deny funding for Obama’s resettlement operation.
(4) Ryan’s Omnibus Funds All of the Mideast Immigration Programs That Have Been Exploited by Terrorists in Recent Years

Although multiple immigrant and visa programs in recent years have been exploited by terrorists (such as the F-1 “student” visa, the K-1 “fiancée” visa, and our green card and refugee programs), Ryan’s proposal does nothing to limit admissions from jihadist-prone regions. As Senators Shelby and Sessions of Alabama noted in a joint statement: “The omnibus would put the U.S. on a path to approve admission for hundreds of thousands of migrants from a broad range of countries with jihadists movements over the next 12 months, on top of all the other autopilot annual immigration.”

(5) Ryan’s Omnibus Funds Illegal Alien Resettlement

On page 917 of Ryan’s omnibus a section titled “Refugee and Entrant Assistance” funds the President’s resettlement of illegal immigrant border crossers.

(6) Ryan’s Omnibus Funds the Release of Criminal Aliens

Senior legislative aides tell Breitbart News that Ryan’s bill does not do anything to change the enforcement priorities that Jeh Johnson established a little over a year ago that would shield entire categories of criminal aliens from immigration law, nor does it include language recommended by Sessions and Shelby to “deny the expenditure of funds to issue visas to countries that refuse to repatriate criminal aliens.”

(7) Ryan’s Omnibus Quadruples H-2B Foreign Worker Visas

Despite Ryan’s pledge not to move an immigration compromise with President Obama, tucked 700 pages into Ryan’s spending bill is language that would resuscitate and expand a controversial provision of the Schumer-Rubio Gang of Eight plan to increase the H-2B visa program.

The provision “would quadruple the number of H-2B visas for unskilled guest workers, for a total of more than 250,000,” writes immigration attorney Ian Smith. The Americans who fill these jobs are typically “society’s most vulnerable — including single women, the disabled, the elderly, minorities, teenagers, students, and first-generation immigrants,”  Smith explains.

A recent BuzzFeed exposé revealed how this program allows businesses to discriminate against American workers and “deliberately den[y] jobs to American workers so they can hire foreign workers on H-2 visas instead.” As one GOP aide told Breitbart News, “This provision is a knife in the heart of the working class, and African Americans.”

(8) Ryan’s Omnibus Funds Tax Credits for Illegal Aliens

Ryan’s bill preserves the expansion of the President’s expiring child tax credits without any accompanying language to prevent illegal aliens from receiving those tax credits. While Sen. Sessions attempted to include language in the bill that would prevent illegal immigrants from receiving tax credits, his recommendation was rejected.

(9) Ryan’s Omnibus Locks-In Huge Spending Increases

The bill funds the Obama-Boehner budget deal, which eliminated spending caps, and will increase both defense and non-defense spending next year by $25 billion more each.

(10) Ryan’s Omnibus Fails to Allocate Funds to Complete the 700-Mile Double-Layer Border Fence That Congress Promised the American People

Nearly a decade ago with the passage of the 2006 Secure Fence Act, the American people were promised a 700-mile double-layer border fence. However, funding for the fence was later gutted and, as a result, its construction was never completed. Despite heightened media focus over the past six months about Americans’ desire for this barrier to illegal entry, Ryan’s bill does not require that funds be allocated to finish the construction of the 700-mile double-layer fence.

A VOTE COULD OCCUR AS EARLY AS THURSDAY AFTER MIDNIGHT, GIVING LAWMAKERS AND THE PUBLIC ONLY ONE FULL BUSINESS DAY TO REVIEW THE 2,242 PAGE PACKAGE. THE RYAN-PELOSI PACKAGE REPRESENTS NOTHING SHORT OF A COMPLETE AND TOTAL BETRAYAL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Yet Ryan’s omnibus serves a second and equally chilling purpose. By locking in the President’s refugee, immigration, and spending priorities, Ryan’s bill is designed to keep these fights out of Congress by getting them off the table for good. Delivering Obama these wins–and pushing these issues beyond the purview of Congress–will suppress public attention to the issues and, in so doing, will boost the candidacy of the Republican establishment’s preferred presidential contenders, who favor President Obama’s immigration agenda.

What may prove most discouraging of all to Americans is that recent reports reveal that conservatives in the so-called House Freedom Caucus are praising Ryan even as he permanently locks in these irreversible and anti-American immigration policies.According to Politico, the House Freedom Caucus will “give Ryan a pass” even as he funds disastrous policies that prioritize the interests of foreign nationals and global corporatists above the needs of the American people whom lawmakers are supposed to represent. source


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on December 29, 2015, 03:40:46 pm
House Democrats Move to Criminalize Criticism of Islam

Lumping together violence with “hateful rhetoric” is a call to destroy the freedom of speech.



December 17, 2015 ought henceforth to be a date which will live in infamy, as that was the day that some of the leading Democrats in the House of Representatives came out in favor of the destruction of the First Amendment. Sponsored by among others, Muslim Congressmen Keith Ellison and Andre Carson, as well as Eleanor Holmes Norton, Loretta Sanchez, Charles Rangel, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Joe Kennedy, Al Green, Judy Chu, Debbie Dingell, Niki Tsongas, John Conyers, José Serrano, Hank Johnson, and many others, House Resolution 569 condemns “violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States.” The Resolution has been referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

That’s right: “violence, bigotry and hateful rhetoric.” The implications of those five words will fly by most people who read them, and the mainstream media, of course, will do nothing to elucidate them. But what H. Res. 569 does is conflate violence -- attacks on innocent civilians, which have no justification under any circumstances – with “bigotry” and “hateful rhetoric,” which are identified on the basis of subjective judgments. The inclusion of condemnations of “bigotry” and “hateful rhetoric” in this Resolution, while appearing to be high-minded, take on an ominous character when one recalls the fact that for years, Ellison, Carson, and his allies (including groups such as the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR) have been smearing any and all honest examination of how Islamic jihadists use the texts and teachings of Islam to incite hatred and violence as “bigotry” and “hateful rhetoric.” This Resolution is using the specter of violence against Muslims to try to quash legitimate research into the motives and goals of those who have vowed to destroy us, which will have the effect of allowing the jihad to advance unimpeded and unopposed.

That’s not what this H. Res. 569 would do, you say? It’s just about condemning “hate speech,” not free speech? That kind of sloppy reasoning may pass for thought on most campuses today, but there is really no excuse for it. Take, for example, the wife of Paris jihad murderer Samy Amimour – please. It was recently revealed that she happily boasted about his role in the murder of 130 Paris infidels: “I encouraged my husband to leave in order to terrorize the people of France who have so much blood on their hands […] I’m so proud of my husband and to boast about his virtue, ah la la, I am so happy.” Proud wifey added: “As long as you continue to offend Islam and Muslims, you will be potential targets, and not just cops and Jews but everyone.”

Now Samy Amimour’s wife sounds as if she would be very happy with H. Res. 569, and its sponsors would no doubt gladly avow that we should stop offending Islam and Muslims – that is, cut out the “bigotry” and “hateful rhetoric.” If we are going to be “potential targets” even if we’re not “cops” or “Jews,” as long as we “continue to offend Islam and Muslims,” then the obvious solution, according to the Western intelligentsia, is to stop doing anything that might offend Islam and Muslims – oh, and stop being cops and Jews. Barack “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam” says it. Hillary “We’re going to have that filmmaker arrested” Clinton says it. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, certain that anyone who speaks honestly about Islam and jihad is a continuing danger to the Church, says it.

And it should be easy. What offends Islam and Muslims? It ought to be a simple matter to cross those things off our list, right? Making a few sacrifices for the sake of our future of glorious diversity should be a no-brainer for every millennial, and everyone of every age who is concerned about “hate,” right? So let’s see. Drawing Muhammad – that’s right out. And of course, Christmas celebrations, officially banned this year in three Muslim countries and frowned upon (at best) in many others, will have to go as well. Alcohol and pork? Not in public, at least. Conversion from Islam to Christianity? No more of that. Building churches? Come on, you’ve got to be more multicultural!

Everyone agrees. The leaders of free societies are eagerly lining up to relinquish those freedoms. The glorious diversity of our multicultural future demands it. And that future will be grand indeed, a gorgeous mosaic, as everyone assures us, once those horrible “Islamophobes” are forcibly silenced. Everyone will applaud that. Most won’t even remember, once the jihad agenda becomes clear and undeniable to everyone in the U.S. on a daily basis and no one is able to say a single thing about it, that there used to be some people around who tried to warn them.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/261268/house-democrats-move-criminalize-criticism-islam-robert-spencer


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on January 18, 2016, 10:56:57 pm
Wisconsin Muslims Quit Manufacturing Job After Company Changes Prayer Policy

Dozens of Muslims in Wisconsin are reportedly now out of a job after officials at a lawn mower and snow blower manufacturing company changed its prayer policy to disallow prayer breaks other than at meals.

Ariens had previously allowed workers to walk away from the production line twice during a shift to offer up two of the five prayers that they are required to pray each day at specific times according to the Islamic religion. A co-worker could fill in for them during the five minutes that they were gone.

However, Ariens recently changed its policy to require employees to stay on the production line at all times, except for during their lunch break.

“We are asking employees to pray during scheduled breaks in our designated prayer rooms,” it said in a memo. “Our manufacturing environment does not allow for unscheduled breaks in production.”

Muslims state that the new policy violates their faith because now they will not be able to pray at the specific times required in Islam.

“If someone tells you, ‘You pray on your break,’ and the break time is not the prayer time, it will be impossible to pray,” Green Bay Masjid Imam Hasan Abdi explained to local television station WNCN.

“So they say, ‘If you don’t pray at the break time,’ they give us this [unemployment] paper to just leave,” former employee Ibrahim Mehemmed also told the outlet.

    Connect with Christian News

Over 50 Ariens employees were affected by the decision, and according to reports, 10 so far have opted to stay and comply with the new rules.

“We are open to any of the employees returning to work under the new policy or will look for openings in shifts that do not coincide with prayer time,” President Dan Ariens said in a statement. “We respect their faith, and we respect their decision regardless of their choice to return to work or not.”

He said that the company has sought to understand Muslim practices and has not fired anyone over issue.

“Our staff is committed to providing a great place to work for all employees and have met with members of our Somalian employee group to better understand their needs. We consulted with local representatives who are of Muslim faith to help provide sustainable solutions,” Ariens said. “We want to be clear that no one was terminated here.”

The federal Equal Opportunity Commission outlines that “an employer does not have to accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs or practices if doing so would cause undue hardship to the employer,” resulting in “decreased efficiency” on the job.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is asking Ariens to allow employees to continue to leave the production line during the prayer times while a solution is reached.

“These types of accommodation disputes can be resolved in a spirit of respect for constitutionally-protected religious rights and for the legitimate needs of both employees and employers,” spokesman Ibrahim Hooper said in a press release.

Last month, 150 Muslims were fired from the Cargill meat plan in Colorado after they protested officials who made a similar decision to ban employees from leaving the production line. After not showing up for work for three days straight, they were terminated.

http://christiannews.net/2016/01/18/wisconsin-muslims-quit-manufacturing-job-after-company-changes-prayer-policy/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on February 15, 2016, 06:30:19 pm
New York school holds World Hijab Day

Parents were not informed in advance, and many were angry. Experts say that the hijab is actually not an Islamic requirement

Officials at the World [High] School of Inquiry in Rochester, New York, spent a week this month fielding dozens of calls from parents angry about a “World Hijab Day” event that encouraged girls to wear the Muslim religious head covering.

So reports EAGnews.org, the flagship website of Education Action Group Foundation, Inc.

The "Hijab Day" was held in the school on the first Friday of this month, at the request of a sophomore who wears a hijab every day. The principal approved the idea, and teachers brought in 150 scarves for female students to try on and wear for the day. Boys were given carnations to wear in solidarity.

Little did the principal realize, for some reason, the backlash the idea would cause.

“As a high school teacher for over 30 years, let me say that this is wrong on so many levels,” Jim Farnholz wrote on his Facebook page. He elaborated: "All religions are taught in our global studies classes. That being said, that is where understanding, tolerance and the good and bad of religion and history are taught. This, however, is a clear violation of separation of church and state.”

The student who initiated the project – originally from Yemen – said, “We wanted [the students] to experience it and feel how we feel… I just feel proud that I’m sharing my culture.”

Fear of legal repercussions, of course, had the final say. A school district spokesman said that when officials consulted with an attorney about the World Hijab Day event, they were advised that there would be legal issues if the school said no to the event.

The principal, Sheela Webster, was one of those who donned a hijab for the day. She insisted that the event was not religious, but rather cultural and experiential: "We are an experiential school; we engage kids in all kinds of activities and projects all of the time, so the perspective of being able to learn what a hijab is, why some women choose to wear it and why some women don’t choose to wear it…"

A Clarion Project report commented on this point: "Unfortunately, learning about 'why some women don’t choose to wear it' – or more pointedly, what happens to women in certain Muslim countries and societies who have no choice whether or not to wear it - was not part of the program."

Some Muslims have noted that there is a well-financed conservative effort within modern Islam to promulgate the idea that the hijab is a requirement of Islam – even though as recently as two or three decades ago, in many Islamic societies it was not. It is no longer uncommon to hear of "honor killings," both in the West and in Muslim countries, of Muslim women who did not don a hijab.

One offended Rochester school parent commented online on the hijab project, writing, “What lesson will they wear a Yarmulke in? Or the Christian cross? Or the Hindu turban?... Funny how it always seems to be the Muslims they learn about…"

Another commenter was more forthright: “How disgusting and irresponsible for any educator to encourage a child to wear a symbol of oppression, whether it be religious or cultural,” Rebecca Sluman wrote. And Rick Bentley added, "Don’t you kids dare wear a shirt with the American flag on it, someone WILL be offended."

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/208034#.VsJssPk4G72


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on March 29, 2016, 08:02:12 pm
UPDATE! Do These Maps Show The Coming 'End Of America'? Reports Of Danger At 'Wide Open Border' As Men Shout 'Allahu Akbar' And Some Religions Become 'Above The Law Of The Land' In America

(http://allnewspipeline.com/images/2015_immigration_map_percentage_by_state.jpg)

UPDATE: CBS News LA confirms 17 men of Middle Eastern descent were arrested for firing off shots in the desert and chanting as shared in the 1st video below. They have since been released.

According to a story from Supreme Patriot who used a PBS story as their source, the Saint Cloud school district in the state of Minnesota has returned prayer to public schools. While many might think that this news is a great thing, we're also told the kicker: Prayer is returned to school for Muslims only. While some might think that is unfair, it's actually not according to the Houston branch Director of CAIR Mustafa Carrol who simply stated: "If we are practicing Muslims, we are above the law of the land."

As the map at the top of this story shows us, large parts of America now have a large percentage of immigrants living within their states. Is all of this MORE proof we are now beginning to witness the 'end of America' as we know it and the beginning of an America where certain groups hold rights not held by everyone else? Wouldn't that be strongly against the US Constitution? If we were parents living in St. Cloud, Minnesota, we'd be filing lawsuits right now against the school district if they're allowing Muslims to pray in school and Christians not to.

Buried deep in a PBS article about how the St. Cloud, Minn., school district is accommodating a large Somali population was a telling example of religious bias. While public schools have appropriately been barred from leading students in corporate Christian prayer, this district is going out of its way to satisfy the desires of the Muslim community.

“In the district’s middle and high schools,” the report stated, “Muslim students have access to private rooms with prayer rugs for the five daily prayers.”

(http://allnewspipeline.com/images/10421128_714420345283218_8752082630512969602_n.jpg)

The map seen at the top of this story shows the percentage share of the state population of immigrants to each US state and when compared with map below showing the same percentages for each state from the year 1970, we see why many Americans are deeply concerned as many states are now made up of between 20% and 40% immigrant with 1/3 of US states at a level of over 15%.

While we've always believed that LEGAL immigration is a great thing, and has helped to make America what we are today, we've long considered ILLEGAL immigration to be a huge crime itself upon our population and as we see in the 3rd video below, there is much evidence that we are now watching 'white genocide' unfolding.

(http://allnewspipeline.com/images/1970_immigration_map.jpg)

We also take a look below at an alarming report out of the California dessert where what has been called a huge group of Middle Eastern men were recently arrested after firing guns into the air and allegedly calling out 'Allahu Akhbar' as also heard more in the 1st video below. In the 2nd video below, we learn about a 10-mile span along the US Mexico border that is remaining wide open, allowing anyone who wants to come in to come in.

According to the Washington Times story,

One third of the nation's 50 states now have immigrant populations over 15 percent, with six over 25 percent, raising new questions about the country's ability to absorb the immigrant flood in schools and the job market, a new report on government immigration data said.
The new Center for Immigration Studies analysis of the 61 million immigrants and their children now in America revealed the speed at how the nation's population has changed since 1970.

According to interactive maps unveiled Monday by CIS, there were no states in 1970 that recorded immigrant populations over 15 percent. Today one third of the nation's states register over 15 percent immigrant: California, Nevada, Texas, Florida, New York, New Jersey, Washington, Arizona, Illinois, Maryland, Georgia, Virginia, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Delaware, and Oregon.

https://youtu.be/4wFId-4udN4

https://youtu.be/Kn4Bint7CV8

https://youtu.be/02FE0j0RSCQ

http://allnewspipeline.com/State_Maps_Show_Coming_End_Of_America.php


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on May 09, 2016, 06:55:27 pm
Paul Ryan Says U.S. Must Admit Muslim Migrants, Sends Kids to Private School that Screens Them Out

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/05/09/paul-ryan-says-u-s-must-admit-muslim-migrants-sends-kids-to-private-school-that-screens-them-out/

Hopefully they will vote this Liberal out of office.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on June 07, 2016, 06:26:17 pm
CAIR’s instructions to Muslims: Defy Customs Agents

The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has called on Muslims to openly defy U.S. Customs Agents when questioned on travel from Islamic controlled countries by saying, “None of your Damn Business.”

Hassan Shibly (Executive Director CAIR, Florida) also encourages Muslims to agitate Customs Agents by saying Islamic prayers “very loudly” when questioned. Shibly also stated that he was, “Asked to do this by our friends from within the government.” Hassan Shibly was awarded by Nihad Awad (CAIR co-founder and National Executive Director) as “CAIR Chapter of the Year” in 2013.

CAIR’s open defiance of law enforcement has been well documented. In 2011 CAIR, California posted flyers on their website featuring a sinister looking FBI agent with the headlines, “Build a Wall of Resistance,” and “Don’t Talk to the FBI.”


In November 2014 the United Arab Emirates specifically listed CAIR as a “terrorist organization,” saying the group is linked to the Muslim Brotherhood, promotes extremism and incites and finances terrorism, adding that it wears “a cloak of democracy and liberalism.”

In July 2014, Breitbart released a story showing video of Shibly’s CAIR, FL group sponsoring an pro HAMAS rally in Miami where members were chanting, “We are HAMAS. We are Jihad.”

https://youtu.be/ZaZq8Xi2Vr4

https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2016/06/04/cairs-instructions-to-muslims-defy-customs-agents/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on June 10, 2016, 06:38:23 pm
Muslims Demand Texas Mayor Surrender After She Attacked Shariah Court… Here’s Her Response

The group of Muslims who attempted to establish the first Islamic Sharia court inside the United States in the town of Irving, Texas just received a devastating blow thanks to the town’s mayor standing strong and not backing down.

Mayor Beth Van Duyne made a public Facebook post stating that she backs the new Texas law which prohibits any kind of foreign law from being practiced in the state of Texas.

After calls, threats and toddler-like demands to apologize from the Muslims who attempted to form the Sharia tribunal along with representatives from the Council on Islamic-American Relations, a known front for the Muslim Brotherhood, the mayor never once backed down.

There were a multitude of illegal activities taking place behind the attempted formation of the Sharia court, including the fact that all four of the “voluntary” Sharia lawyers were not licensed to practice law in Texas — that’s a third degree felony.

The rules of the Sharia court had different guidelines for women and men, with typical Islamic humiliation tactics to be used against women, which is constitutionally illegal.

The Sharia court “lawyers” also conveniently failed to inform the city of Irving that they were operating a court inside of the town — again, illegal.

The mayor’s office responded to Zia Sheikh’s public hissy fit with a call for them to follow the Consitution and the American Laws for American Courts bill, which prohibits foreign law from being practiced in the state of Texas.

Their response was in typical radical Islamic fashion. “We don’t care about the bill. It’s not going to affect us in any way, shape or form. The bottom line is the foundation of this bill is anti-Islamic,” Sheikh said.

During the city vote to support the Texas bill, which passed by a 5-4 vote, members from CAIR were present, attempting to intimidate the crowd by alleging that the bill was “anti-Islamic” and used words like “bigotry” and “Islamophobia.” (H/T MadWorldNews)

The bill makes no specific reference to Islam or Sharia — it merely states that no foreign law is to be practiced in the state.

It should also be noted that one of the votes that opposed the bill was from a Muslim council member, who addressed his fellow Muslims in the room before casting his “no” vote in dramatic fashion.

We salute Mayor Van Duyne for staying strong in the face of threats and intimidation from the radical Islamic members of the Sharia court. Her efforts to stop this abomination will echo throughout the country, setting precedent for other cities and towns where Muslims attempt to establish footholds.

Share this on Facebook and Twitter if you support the mayor’s efforts to put a screeching halt to the formation of illegal Sharia courts in her Texas town.

http://conservativetribune.com/muslims-attack-texas-mayor/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on June 17, 2016, 02:49:54 pm
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/51-united-states-muslims-demand-sharia-say-islam-superior-american-democracy/
6/17/16

51% OF UNITED STATES MUSLIMS DEMAND SHARIA, SAY ISLAM IS SUPERIOR TO AMERICAN DEMOCRACY


Omar Ahmad, co-founder of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the top Muslim lobby group in Washington: “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Quran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.”
51% of U.S. Muslims want Sharia; 60% of young Muslims more loyal to Islam than to U.S.

EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was originally published in October of 2015, and in that time the situation has worsened dramatically. While some Muslims have seemed to assimilate into American culture, the vast majority have not. They are patiently biding their time, waiting until their numbers increase to the point where they can force change through either terrorism or the ballot box. But either way, they are planning the fall of America.

Really, what did you expect? A considerable portion of U.S. domestic and foreign policy is based on the assumption that Islam in the U.S. will be different: that Muslims here believe differently from those elsewhere, and do not accept the doctrines of violence against and subjugation of unbelievers that have characterized Islam throughout its history. But on what is that assumption based? Nothing but wishful thinking. And future generations of non-Muslims will pay the price.

“Meanwhile, An Islamic Fifth Column Builds Inside America,” by Paul Sperry, IBD, October 1, 2015
In berating GOP presidential hopeful Ben Carson for suggesting a loyalty test for Muslims seeking high office, CNN host Jake Tapper maintained that he doesn’t know a single observant Muslim-American who wants to Islamize America.

“I just don’t know any Muslim-Americans — and I know plenty — who feel that way, even if they are observant Muslims,” he scowled.

Tapper doesn’t get out much. If he did, chances are he’d run into some of the 51% of Muslims living in the U.S. who just this June told Polling Co. they preferred having “the choice of being governed according to Shariah,” or Islamic law. Or the 60% of Muslim-Americans under 30 who told Pew Research they’re more loyal to Islam than America.

Maybe they’re all heretics, so let’s see what the enlightened Muslims think.
If Tapper did a little independent research he’d quickly find that America’s most respected Islamic leaders and scholars also want theocracy, not democracy, and even advocate trading the Constitution for the Quran.
These aren’t fringe players. These are the top officials representing the Muslim establishment in America today.

Hopefully none of them ever runs for president, because here’s what he’d have to say about the U.S. system of government:

•   Muzammil Siddiqi, chairman of both the Fiqh Council of North America, which dispenses Islamic rulings, and the North American Islamic Trust, which owns most of the mosques in the U.S.: “As Muslims, we should participate in the system to safeguard our interests and try to bring gradual change, but we must not forget that Allah’s rules have to be established in all lands, and all our efforts should lead to that direction.”

•   Omar Ahmad, co-founder of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the top Muslim lobby group in Washington: “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Quran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.”

•   CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper: “I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future.”

•   Imam Siraj Wahhaj, director of the Muslim Alliance in North America: “In time, this so-called democracy will crumble, and there will be nothing. And the only thing that will remain will be Islam.”

•   Imam Zaid Shakir, co-founder of Zaytuna College in Berkeley, Calif.: “If we put a nationwide infrastructure in place and marshaled our resources, we’d take over this country in a very short time. . . . What a great victory it will be for Islam to have this country in the fold and ranks of the Muslims.”…source


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 02, 2016, 09:54:40 pm
https://pjmedia.com/blog/shocking-polls-show-what-u-s-muslims-think-of-u-s-laws/
7/1/16
Shocking Polls Show What U.S. Muslims Think of U.S. Laws

As July 4 approaches, new polling data reveal non-Muslim Americans are increasingly cognizant of the threat Sharia -- Islam’s totalitarian religio-political “law” -- poses to their basic liberties. Overwhelmingly, they reject its encroachment in the United States.

But polling data also reveal that an ominous, growing proportion of American Muslims wish to impose Sharia on America.

Opinion Savvy polled a random sample of 803 registered voters -- 98.2% non-Muslim, and 1.8% Muslim (with age, race, gender, political affiliation, and region propensity score-weighted to reduce biases) -- from June 19 to June 20, 2016. They asked:

Do you believe that the United States government should screen, or actively identify individuals entering the United States who support Sharia law?

Seventy-one percent affirmed:

Yes, supporters of Sharia should be identified before they are admitted into the US.

The group answering “yes” was then asked:

Once identified, do you believe that individuals who support the practice of Sharia law should be admitted into the United States?

Eighty percent responded:

No, supporters of Sharia should not be admitted into the US.

The next query, which addressed only foreign visitors, elicited an even more emphatic demand for fidelity to bedrock First Amendment principles. It asked:

Do you believe that the United States government should require all foreign individuals entering the United States to affirm that they will uphold the principles of the constitution, such as freedom of religion and speech, above all personal ideologies for the duration of their stay in the country?

Seventy-eight percent insisted:

Yes, visitors to the US should be required to agree to uphold the constitution, regardless of their personal ideology, as a condition of their visit.

The unblinkered assessment of Sharia validates its broadly shared rejection by non-Muslim Americans, but also illustrates how increased U.S. Muslim Sharia support represents a dangerous trend.

Time Is Running Out for American Muslims

The Sharia, Islam’s canon law, is traceable to Koranic verses and edicts (45:18, 42:13, 42:21, 5:48; 4:34, 5:33-34, 5:38, 8:12-14; 9:5, 9:29, 24:2-4), as further elaborated in the “hadith” -- the traditions of Islam’s prophet Muhammad and the earliest Muslim community -- and codified into formal “legal” rulings by Islam’s greatest classical legists. Sharia is a retrogressive development compared with the evolution of clear distinctions between “ritual, the law, moral doctrine, good customs in society, etc.,” within Western European Christendom.

Sharia is utterly incompatible with the conceptions of human rights enshrined in the U.S. Bill of Rights.



Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on July 13, 2016, 08:22:21 pm
Terror-Tied Muslims Co-opting Black Lives Matter: 'You Are the New Black People of America'

"We are the community that staged a revolution across the world… Why can't we have that revolution in America?"

https://youtu.be/g1pVwR-zYKU

Muslim-American activists and organizations are actively co-opting the Black Lives Matter movement and making it a movement of their own.

The call was sent out in December of last year at the 14th Annual MAS-ICNA convention in Chicago by the founder and executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, Nihad Awad. He told the thousands in attendance:

    "Black Lives Matter is our matter. Black Lives Matter is our campaign."

Awad also said that every mosque in the United States needs to be turned into voter registration centers:

    "You are powerful. You can make whole difference in 2016. You can change the reality of our time. This is the time for us American-Muslims to be in the front, not to retreat. Because all of you are leaders. Your votes are your negotiating power in the year 2016. Turn your centers -- Islamic centers, mosques -- into registration centers for voters."

David Horowitz's Discover the Networks tells you everything you need to know about terror-tied CAIR's leader, Nihad Awad: a supporter of Hamas who rejects Israel's right to exist, blames U.S. presidents for being "servants to Israel, and partially blames America for the 9/11 attacks.

Also speaking at the Muslim American Society (MAS) convention was its executive director and project developer Khalilah Sabra, a prominent Islamic activist. Here's what she had to tell the Muslims in the crowd:

    "You are the new black people of America. You are the people being imprisoned. You are the people being denied rights. You are people being denied the dream… And just as these black brothers and sisters have been murdered in the streets, if we don't stand, you will see Muslims murdered in the streets."

Then she made this stunning statement:

    "We are the community that staged a revolution across the world. If we could do that, why can't we have that revolution in America. You are the children of the greatest man in history: Muhammad… You don't need another message, you don't need another blueprint about what you should do. You know what you should do. And if we do it, Allah has promised us the same victories that he granted to those who came before us. And today must be that start. I don't want any of you leaving here without dedicating yourself to a cause for civil rights."

Once again turning to Discover the Networks, MAS was founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization Sabra was recruited into in the late 1980s. MAS advocates for sharia law in America. Both MAS and CAIR have been designated terrorist organizations by the government of the United Arab Emirates.

Pamela Gellar also noted the co-opting of BLM by Muslims, showing how ISIS is also on board with Black Lives Matter and is celebrating the deaths of American police officers online, writing:

    "The attack may not be by Mujahideen. However most probably it is 'black vs white' racial conflict showing the amount of racism still existing in so called "modern/developed" countries… If the disbelievers can attack the American govt for their defence or honour with Snipers, We should be the first ones to do it and incite others when we are ordered by our religion to defend ourselves and our religion."

More of the CAIR and MAS leaders' speeches below, starting at the :58 second mark:

https://youtu.be/66_9IAZP6Ls

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/terror-tied-muslims-co-opting-black-lives-matter-you-are-new-black-people-america


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on July 14, 2016, 10:09:51 pm
.@newtgingrich: "We should...test every person here who is of a Muslim background, & if they believe in shariah they should be deported."

https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/753777038935207937

Jihad and World Conquest
“Muhammad’s practice and constant encouragement
of bloodshed are unique in the history of religions.
Murder, pillage, ****, and more murder in the Quran
and in the Traditions ‘seem to have impressed his
followers with a profound belief in the value of
bloodshed as opening the gates of Paradise’ and
prompted countless Muslim governors, caliphs, and
viziers to refer to Muhammad’s example to justify
their mass killings, looting, and destruction. ‘Kill, kill
the unbelievers wherever you find them’ is an
injunction both unambiguous and powerful” (Serge
Trifkovic, The Sword of the Prophet, p. 51).
“Do not think that the jihad is over. Soon Islam will
bring terror to the Kafirs. After death, they will burn
in Hell. The evil that will bring about their destruction
is that they do not practice the religion of
Islam” (Muhammad, cited by Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul
Allah, 599).
The objective of Islam is to conquer the world for Allah.
Spreading religion by the sword has been an integral part of
the Islamic religion from its inception.
There are more than 100 verses in the Quran that
command Muslims to spread Islam with the sword.
“When the sacred months are passed, kill the
unbelievers wherever you find them. Take them as
captives, besiege them, and lie in wait for them with
every kind of ambush. If they submit to Islam, observe
prayer, and pay the poor tax, then let them go their
way (Surah 9:5).
“Make war on those who have received the Scriptures
but do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day” (Surah
9:29).
43
“Believers, fight the Kafirs who are near you, and let
them find you to be tough and hard. Know that Allah
is with those who guard against evil” (Surah 9:123).
“Kill them wherever you find them, and drive them
out of whatever place from which they have driven
you out for persecution. ... Fight them until you are no
longer persecuted and the religion of Allah reigns
absolute, but if they give up, then only fight the evildoers”
(Surah 2:191, 193).
“When you encounter the Kafirs on the battlefield, cut
off their heads until you have thoroughly defeated
them and then take the prisoners and tie them up
firmly...” (Surah 47:4).
Allah has a special love for Muslims who fight and has
little patience with those who do not:
“Oh, believers, what possessed you that when it was
said, ‘March forth in Allah’s cause,’ you clung heavily
to the earth? ... Unless you march forth, He will
punish you with a grievous penalty, and He will put
another in your place” (Surah 9:38).
“Truly Allah loves those who fight for His cause and
stand together in battle array like a solid wall” (Surah
61:4).
“Allah has promised good things to all, but those who
fight for Him will receive a far greater reward than
those who have not...” (Surah 4:95).
Today’s Islamic fundamentalists who are waging violent
jihad (holy war) are not “extremists.” They are the true
Muslims who are taking their religion seriously. They are
walking faithfully in the footsteps of Islam’s founding father.
“Islamic scholars contend it goes against Islamic law to
retreat from jihad and adopt peace unless the Islamic force
is weak and the opponent is strong. After renewed
preparation to wage jihad, the Muslims can reconvene the
hostilities. According to Islamic law, jihad will never cease--
44
it will last to the Day of Judgment” (Michael Evans, Beyond
Iraq, p. 48).
The Islamic definition of peace is Islamic control over the
world.
According to Islam, the world is divided into Dar al-Harb
(the world of war or the non-Islamic people) and Dar al-
Islam (the world of peace or the Muslim world).
“The presumption is that the duty of jihad will
continue, interrupted only by truces, until all the
world either adopts the Muslim faith or subjects to the
Muslim rule” (Gene Gerganus, Peril of Islam: Telling
the Truth, Taylors, SC: Truth Publishers, 2004, pp. 59,
60).
Within 200 years after Muhammad, Muslim armies
conquered many kingdoms and created an Islamic caliphate
that covered more than five million square miles.
They conquered the Sassanid Empire (Persia,
Mesopotamia, Assyria).
They conquered much of the Byzantine Empire.
They conquered the kingdoms of north Africa.
They conquered Spain and Portugal.
This was done by the edge of the sword and was often
accompanied by unspeakable cruelty.
We document the brutality of the Islamic crusades in the
chapter on the history of Islam.
Every Unbeliever a Kafir
According to Islam, humanity is divided into those who
accept Muhammad as the prophet of Allah and those who
do not. Those who do not are the Kafirs.
Kafir is the word that is used in the Quran, and it is a
strong word. It is the word for Allah’s enemies. It is the word
for those who resist the truth. Kafirs are unclean, evil,
cursed, ignorant liars, and partners of Satan. “It is usually
45
translated as unbeliever, but that translation is wrong. The
word unbeliever is neutral. But the attitude of the Quran
towards unbelievers is very negative. ... Kafir shows the
common political treatment of the Christian, Jew, Hindu,
Buddhist, animist, atheist and humanist. What is done to a
pagan can be done to a Jew or any other Kafir” (A Simple
Koran).
A Kafir is hated.
“They who dispute the signs of Allah without authority
having reached them are greatly hated by Allah and the
believers. So Allah seals up every arrogant, disdainful
heart” (Surah 40:35).
A Kafir can be enslaved.
“Muhammad then said, ‘Saed, give these people [the Jews
of Medina] your verdict.’ Saed replied, ‘Their soldiers should
be beheaded and their women and children should become
slaves.’ Muhammad, pleased with the verdict, said, ‘You
have made a ruling that Allah or a king would approve
of’” (Sahih Al-Bukhari hadith 5,58,148).
A Kafir can be mocked.
“On that day the faithful will mock the Kafirs, while they
sit on bridal couches and watch them. Should not the Kafirs
be paid back for what they did?” (Surah 83:34).
A Kafir can be schemed against.
“They plot and scheme against you [Muhammad], and I
[Allah] plot and scheme against them. Therefore, deal calmly
with the Kafirs and leave them alone for awhile” (Surah
86:15).
A Kafir can be deceived.
“Muhammad asked, ‘Who will kill Ka’b, the enemy of
Allah and Muhammad? Bin Maslama rose and responded,
‘O Muhammad! Would it please you if I killed him?’
Muhammad answered, ‘Yes.’ Bin Maslama then said, ‘Give
46
me permission to deceive him with lies so that my plan will
succeed.’ Muhammad replied, ‘You may speak falsely to
him’” (Sahih Al-Bukhari hadith 5,59,369).
A Kafir can be terrorized.
“Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, ‘I will be
with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror
into the Kafirs’ hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of
their fingers” (Surah 8:12).
A Kafir can be beheaded.
“When you encounter the Kafirs on the battlefield, cut off
their heads until you have thoroughly defeated them and
then take the prisoners and tie them up firmly” (Surah 47:4).
A Kafir can be annihilated.
“So the Kafirs were annihilated. All praise be to Allah, the
Lord of the worlds!” (Surah 6:45).
A Kafir can be killed.
“If they do not keep away from you or offer you peace or
withdraw their hostilities, then seize them and kill them
wherever they are. We give you complete authority over
them” (Surah 4:91).
A Kafir can be crucified and his hands and feet hacked off.
“The only reward for those who war against Allah and His
messengers and strive to commit mischief on the earth is
that they will be slain or crucified, have their alternate hands
and feet cut off, or be banished from the land. This will be
their disgrace in this world, and a great torment shall be
theirs in the next except those who repent before you
overpower them. Know that Allah is forgiving and
merciful” (Surah 5:33).
A Kafir can be made war on and humiliated.
“Make war on those who have received the Scriptures but
do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day. They do not
forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden. The
47
Christians and Jews do not follow the religion of truth until
they submit and pay the poll tax [jizya], and they are
humiliated” (Surah 9:29).
A Kafir cannot be befriended.
“Believers should not take Kafirs as friends in preference
to other believers. Those who do this will have none of
Allah’s protection and will only have themselves as guards.
Allah warns you to fear Him for all will return to
Him” (Surah 3:28).
A Kafir is not to be treated with kindness.
“Oh, you who believe, do not take My enemy and yours
for friends by showing them kindness” (Surah 60:1).
Three Stages of Jihad
Gene Gurganus explains that there are three stages of
jihad (Peril of Islam, pp. 114-115).
First there is the weakened stage, which applies to
Muslims living as a minority in a non-Muslim country. “At
this stage, Muslims follow the word given to Muhammad in
Mecca: ‘There is no compulsion in religion’ (Surah 2:256).”
Second, there is the preparation stage, which is reached
when Muslims are a reasonably influential minority. At this
stage they make preparations in every possible area--
financial, physical, military, mental and any other. Surah
8:59-60 says, “Against them [unbelievers] make ready your
strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of
war, to strike terror into (the hearts) of the enemies of Allah
and your enemies, and others besides whom you may not
know, but whom Allah knows.”
The third stage is the jihad stage, which commences
“when Muslims are a minority with strength, influence and
power.” At this stage “every Muslim’s duty is to actively fight
the enemy, overturning the system of the non-Muslim
48
country and establishing Islamic authority.” This stage is
based on the final revelation Muhammad received
concerning jihad, which is Surah 9:5 -- “kill the Kafirs
wherever you find them. Take them as captives, besiege
them, and lie in wait for them with every kind of ambush.”
Thus “Muslims are commanded to kill everyone who
chooses not to convert to Islam. The verse says wherever you
find them. There are no geographical limits” (Peril of Islam,
p. 114).
The Doctrine of Abrogation
Gene Gurganus also explains the “doctrine of abrogation”
in the Islamic religion. According to this doctrine, Allah
causes some parts of the Quran to be abrogated or abolished
by later commandments. This is taught in the Quran as
follows:
“Whatever a Verse (revelation) do We abrogate or
cause to be forgotten, We bring a better one or similar
to it. Know you not that Allah is able to do all
things?” (Surah 2:106).
Muhammad’s life and ministry was divided into two parts:
the tolerant years in Mecca and the aggressive years in
Medina, and earlier commandments are superseded by later
ones. In Mecca, Muhammad used teaching in an attempt to
convert the people. During that period, he wrote prophecies
along the lines of being at peace with non-Muslims and not
forcing your religion upon others.
For example, consider the following messages that were
given in Mecca and soon after his arrival in Medina, when
he was still vulnerable:
“We know of best what they say; and you (O
Muhammad) ARE NOT A TYRANT OVER THEM.
But warn by the Qur’an, him who fears My
Threat” (Surah 50:45).
49


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 16, 2016, 09:39:24 pm
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/erdogan-stage-phony-coup-turkey-create-islamic-state/
7/16/16

Did Erdogan Stage A Phony Coup So He Could Create An Islamic State In Turkey?

Erdogan likely has the support of this ****, Islamist minority of 12%, who probably do expect him to create their utopia. At the same time, he also has the support of a much larger block of “conservative” voters who are religious and like reference to religion, but who still prefer to live under secular law. This is why Erdogan would want to retain secularism in the Turkish constitution, albeit while not shying from venerating religion in the public square or perhaps even in the constitution.


A US-based Turkish cleric accused of plotting a coup to overthrow the Ankara government has claimed President Recep Erdogan staged the rebellion himself to justify a major clampdown on opposition forces.

Fethullah Gulen, who was a former key ally of Erdogan has been blamed by the politician of using his contacts to develop a ‘parallel structure’ to overthrow the state. Erdogan has called on US President Barack Obama to extradite Gulen, who is based in Pennsylvania.

In response to the attempted rebellion, Turkish authorities have detained 2,745 judges and prosecutors whose loyalty to the regime has been questioned. Also, some 2,839 soldiers – including the head of the Third Army Corps in Istanbul, General Erdal Ozturk – have been arrested.

PM Binali Yildrim described the plot, which claimed the lives of 161 civilians with 1,440 wounded, as a ‘black stain on Turkish democracy’.

Parliament Speaker Ismail Kahraman unexpectedly sparked controversy in Turkey when on April 25 he declared that Turkey’s new constitution should forgo mention of “secularism” and instead be a “religious constitution” referencing God. His words reignited Turkey’s always tense “secularism debate,” which has been amplified since 2002 when the Justice and Development Party (AKP) came to power. Kahraman’s remarks led to protests in a number of cities, a call by the main opposition leader for him to resign and allegations by secular pundits that the Speaker had shown the AKP’s “true face,” its “real intentions.” Because Kahraman is a known confidant of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, many also suspected that his statement was part of a scheme being orchestrated by Turkey’s leader.

more


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 21, 2016, 09:21:13 pm
https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-leading-muslim-supporter-000000039.html
7/21/16
Donald Trump’s leading Muslim supporter may be an army of one

By the time Sajid Tarar took the stage to deliver the closing benediction at the Republican National Convention Tuesday night, many delegates and members of the press had already begun filing out of Cleveland’s Quicken Loans arena. 

Day two of the RNC had been an eventful one, with Donald Trump’s official nomination for the White House followed by speeches from his children and past political rivals like Ben Carson and Chris Christie.

But the arrival of perhaps the most unlikely speaker on the RNC dais, a 56-year-old Pakistani immigrant and Muslim Trump supporter, did not go unnoticed. According to reporters inside the venue, a single delegate was heard shouting “no Islam” as Tarar, clad in a silvery bow tie, addressed the crowd.

“Let’s pray,” Tarar said when he reached the podium. “Pray for a strong America, for a safe America. And let’s ask God to make us strong to fight terrorism all over the world.”

Muslim for Trump delivers closing night prayer at RNC

At the close of the second night of the Republican National Convention, Sajid Tarar of American Muslims for Trump delivered the closing prayer.

Other than maybe Mexicans, no group has been subjected to more attacks by the Trump campaign than Muslims. The Republican presidential nominee has accused Muslim-Americans of celebrating 9/11, claimed that “Islam hates America” and proposed a ban on Muslim travel to the U.S. — ramping up the rhetoric after each of the recent domestic and international terror attacks.

With each step closer to the White House, he’s picked up support for his controversial proposals. A recent example: After the terror attack in Nice, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (in a move seen as a last-ditch attempt to be chosen as running mate) proposed that all Americans “of a Muslim background” be required to undergo some sort of religious test, “and if they believe in Sharia, they should be deported.”

Gingrich didn’t get the gig. But days before members of Republican National Committee would officially nominate Trump for the presidency, they approved a new provision to the party platform calling for “special scrutiny” of all non-U.S. citizens seeking to enter the country from “regions associated with Islamic terrorism.”

In response to a request for more information on how Tarar was chosen for the benediction, a spokesperson for the convention’s planning committee referred Yahoo News to Trump’s press secretary, who could not be reached for comment.

It’s not hard to imagine why Tarar — a vocal supporter Trump’s more controversial proposals, including the Muslim travel ban — would be invited.

As Tarar himself explained in an interview with CNN Tuesday night, he had come to the RNC to show the rest of America that all Muslims “are not bad people.”

“We are living here, we are part of American fabric,” he said. “And we will stand behind America. The safety of America is our No. 1 priority as well.”

But a spokesperson for the Council on American Islamic Relations, or CAIR, a prominent Muslim advocacy organization that has consistently denounced Trump’s anti-Muslim rhetoric, said Tarar does not speak for the majority of the community.

“The majority of American Muslims reject [trump’s] hostile attitudes toward the Muslim community and his proposals,” said Robert McCaw, CAIR’s government affairs director.

McCaw expressed mixed feelings over Tarar’s appearance at the RNC.

On the one hand, “We’re happy to see the Republican National Convention include a Muslim speaker.”

At the same time, McCaw told Yahoo News he wished they’d picked someone else.

“It could be said the Trump campaign engaged in tokenism,” McCaw added, arguing that Tarar “has no actual position within the Muslim community that gives him leverage, therefore he doesn’t actually represent the views or interests of the Muslim community.”

McCaw described American Muslims for Trump as a “one-off organization that’s engaged in ‘astroturf’ politics.”

“They have no ground presence, no grassroots engagement,” he said, suggesting the group simply exists to give “Trump the coverage he needs to continue making bigoted remarks about the Muslim community.”

It’s unclear how big Tarar’s organization actually is — or whether it’s even much of an organization at all.

Most of the news coverage surrounding his RNC appearance refers to Tarar as the “founder of American Muslims for Trump,” yet a Google search yields little evidence that such a group exists, at least online.

A closed Facebook group called “American Muslims for Trump” boasts two members, neither of which are Tarar.  There is also a separate Facebook community page titled “Muslims for Trump,” which has been “liked” by 581 people but names no specific creator.

more


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on August 01, 2016, 06:51:11 pm
FACEBOOK BLOCKS MICHAEL SAVAGE FOR POSTING NEWS ON ISLAMIC CRIME
Says Mark Zuckerberg 'stabs America in the back'

Facebook has temporarily blocked talk-radio host Michael Savage from posting stories to his page after he put up a link to a story about a Muslim migrant killing a pregnant woman in Germany.

The message said, regarding the posting feature, “This Feature is Temporarily Blocked.”

“You recently posted something that violates Facebook policies, so you’re temporarily blocked from using this feature.”

The message then refers the user to Facebook’s “Community Standards” and states the block will be active for 21 hours.

Facebook’s “Community Standards” page lists “hate speech” as one of its prohibitions, along with “violence and graphic content,” and nudity.

The article linked by Savage was about a pregnant woman in Reutlingen, Germany, who was hacked to death with a meat cleaver by a 21-year-old Syrian refugee.

Michael Savage’s “Government Zero: No Borders, No Language, No Culture” is available at the WND Superstore

On his show Monday, Savage chastised Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, saying he “doesn’t care about my audience.”

“He doesn’t care about the audience of conservatives. He’d rather you all drop dead and go home,” Savage said.

Savage described Zuckerberg as a “classless citizen who enjoys all the benefits of America, enjoys all of the wealth that America has given him, and he stabs America in the back by siding with the Islamic terrorist nations of Iran and Saudi Arabia.”

“That’s why he would ban me from posting an article, which I didn’t write, incidentally.” Savage said. “It was a link an article about a Muslim in Germany, about a week ago, who cut a nine-month pregnant woman to death in the street.

“Zuckerberg found that offensive and anti-Islamic”

In December, as WND reported, Facebook removed a post on Savage’s site of photographs of a 2006 protest outside the Embassy of Denmark in London that featured signs warning of beheading and death for “those who insult Islam.” At that time, Facebook also “determined that it violated Facebook community standards.”

In the 2006 photos, messages in placards held up by the London demonstrators included “Behead those who insult Islam,” “Freedom go to hell,” “Europe. Take some lessons from 9/11” and “Be prepared for the real Holocaust.”

In December, Savage noted that President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey had recently praised Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg for Zuckerberg’s Facebook post in support of Muslims who fear “they will be persecuted for the actions of others.”

“What more needs to be said? Erdogan is a dictator who censors all critics, banishes opposition politicians and arrests journalists,” Savage told WND.

“It would be like Hitler congratulating an American media mogul for saying, ‘Not all Germans are Nazis, and Hitler is misunderstood,'” he said.

“How can another Jewish liberal billionaire be committing cultural suicide? Why are liberal Jews so blind to their own survival? Why do they always side with their enemies?”

Savage said in December it’s only a matter of time before “any and all criticisms of Islam will be considered hate speech by Zuckerberg and the Obama goons.”

“I am banned in Britain and soon banned from Facebook?”

In 2009, Savage was banned from entering the U.K. by Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s government, which lumped him together with Muslim jihadists and leaders of racist groups for “seeking to provoke others to serious criminal acts and fostering hatred,” as WND reported.

In December, Attorney General Loretta Lynch told a Muslim activist group that she would prosecute anti-Muslim rhetoric that “edges toward violence,” sparking widespread criticism that prompted her to walk back the remarks.

Also in December, the British government posted online a citizens’ petition calling to ban Donald Trump from entering the United Kingdom.

In May 2009, then-British Home Secretary Jacqui Smith announced that Savage was on a list of 16 people banned from entry because the government believed their views might provoke violence. Smith said it was “important that people understand the sorts of values and sorts of standards that we have here, the fact that it’s a privilege to come and the sort of things that mean you won’t be welcome in this country.”

A year later, Prime Minister David Cameron’s new government informed Savage it would continue the ban unless he repudiated statements made on his broadcasts that were deemed a threat to public security.

Again, the government didn’t cite any statements.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/facebook-blocks-michael-savage-for-migrant-murder-story/#xwCqdieJ2J31x4Fo.99


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 03, 2016, 04:35:57 pm
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/nwo-globalist-george-w-bush-sent-defend-islam-attack-donald-trump/

NWO Globalist George W. Bush Sent Out To Defend Islam And Attack Donald Trump

Without naming Trump, George W. Bush warned against "isolationism, nativism and protectionism" and blasted Trump for his attacks on Muslims, sources told the Wall Street Journal. The strong rebuke from the Republican Party's last President, who has refused to endorse the nominee, came at a Cincinnati fundraiser for Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), a former Bush administration official.

8/3/16

Former President and NWO globalist George W. Bush laid into Donald Trump’s worldview Tuesday night.

Isn’t it funny, ironically not humorously, that at no point over the past 7 and a half years of having a Socialist-Marxist-Islamic-LGBT president reducing America to an ash heap, that former president George W. Bush had nothing to say about it? Not one word, not ever. That’s because the NWO globalist Bush was showing the NWO globalist Obama some professional courtesy in allowing him time and space to carry out his treasonous agenda. But the “America First” candidate Donald Trump, who is running on a platform of restoring America’s greatness, brings the retired Bush out of retirement and swinging for the fences.

The Republican Party has been freed of twenty years of shackles put on it by the Bush family regime, and Donald Trump was the one who did it. This is why you see the #NeverTrump RINO traitors attack him so strong. This is why you seen them all pledging to vote for Crooked Hillary. They are fooling no one.

The New World Order is an an absolute panic to stop Trump, he better stay away from any and all ‘grassy knolls’ between now and November

Without naming Trump, Bush warned against “isolationism, nativism and protectionism” and blasted Trump for his attacks on Muslims, sources told the Wall Street Journal. The strong rebuke from the Republican Party’s last President, who has refused to endorse the nominee, came at a Cincinnati fundraiser for Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), a former Bush administration official.

Bush has no problem attacking Trump, yet stayed completely silent on the last 8 years of Obama:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjBbRmxx4mA

Bush’s pushback comes as Trump continues to insist he did nothing wrong after attacking the parents of Capt. Humayun Khan, a Muslim-American soldier who died in Iraq, with insinuations about their religion. Bush was a strong defender of Muslim Americans as well as a proponent of immigration reform, a stance at odds with many in his party then and now.

DONALD TRUMP HAS SINGLE-HANDEDLY BROKEN THE BUSH FAMILY STRANGLEHOLD ON THE REPUBLICAN PARTY

“It was an interesting exercise of statecraft,” former Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell told the Journal. “No one could say he directly spoke in attack mode against Donald Trump. Neither could anybody miss the fact that he thought there were some cutting-edge issues that Trump is advancing that need to be scrutinized and debated.” source


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 08, 2016, 07:18:41 pm
America’s Churches Now Installing Armed Guards To Protect Against Islamic Terror Attacks

"Many churches are now hiring self-defense instructors for classes or security guards that include off-duty police," said Ryan Mauro, a professor of Homeland Security at Liberty University and national security analyst for the Clarion Project. "If you are an Islamist terrorist seeking self-glory, executing a priest will bring you more attention than executing an average civilian."

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/americas-churches-now-armed-guards-protect-islamic-terror-attacks/
8/8/16

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/americas-churches-now-armed-guards-protect-islamic-terror-attacks/

American churches take new security measures in face of terror threats

“I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.” Revelation 3:15,16 (KJV)

As Father Josiah Trenham prepared to read the Gospel, several parishioners discreetly scooped up their babies, retreated up the aisles of St. Andrew Orthodox Church and out into the spring air, so as not to allow the crying of little ones to disturb the divine liturgy.

The time-honored tradition was shattered when a car passed by the Riverside, Calif., church, slowing down as the front passenger leaned out of his window and bellowed menacingly through a bullhorn, according to witnesses.

“Allahu Akbar!” the unidentified man repeated several times as the unnerved parents drew their infants close and exchanged worried glances.

Witnesses were able to give Riverside police a description of the green Honda Civic, but not of the three occupants. Some told police they believed one or more of the men may have been taking photographs, according to Officer Ryan Railsback. Although Trenham insisted multiple congregants heard the Arabic phrase, Railsback noted no mention of it was in the police report. Whatever the case, no law was broken – even if an unmistakable message was sent and received.

“Be calm and to keep a special vigilance over the property and our children while we are at church,” Trenham wrote in an email to parishioners in which he recounted the disturbing event. “Pray that these provocative young men might repent of their intimidation and be saved.”

Trenham told FoxNews.com last week the situation remains “tense and tenuous,” and said the church now has security officers on hand for all regular services. “It is a deep sorrow to live this way in the ‘new America,’” he said.

The incident took place on April 12, some four months after a terror attack left 14 dead in nearby San Bernardino, and just over three months before a French priest was killed by ISIS-linked jihadists in his church. The events, whether far or near, underscore a grim new reality for pastors such as Trenham: Instead of offering sanctuary from evil, churches could in fact be attractive targets for terror.

“Many churches are now hiring self-defense instructors for classes or security guards that include off-duty police,” said Ryan Mauro, a professor of Homeland Security at Liberty University and national security analyst for the Clarion Project. “If you are an Islamist terrorist seeking self-glory, executing a priest will bring you more attention than executing an average civilian.”

While no lethal Islamic terror attacks have occurred inside a U.S. church to date, experts like Jeff King, president of International Christian Concern, notes the threat tally is growing.

“I’m pretty sure there will be attacks in the future,” King said. “Until radical Islam is defeated, we can expect Christians, including in the West, to rationally tighten security measures and try to protect themselves from attack.”

In February, Khial Abu-Rayyan, 21, of Dearborn Heights, Mich., was arrested after he told an undercover FBI agent he was preparing to “shoot up” a major church near his home on behalf of ISIS. A month earlier, the Rev. Roger Spradlin of Valley Baptist Church – one of the biggest congregations in Bakersfield, Calif. – told attendees that they had received a threat written in Arabic.

“Undercover officers were then placed during worship services,” Valley Baptist spokesman Dave Kalahar said. “The FBI continues to investigate along with the local task force.”

Last September, an Islamic man clad in combat gear was charged with making a terrorist threat after entering Corinth Missionary Baptist Church, in Bullard, Tex., and claiming that God had instructed him to kill Christians and “other infidels.” A year earlier, police were called to Saint Bartholomew’s Catholic Church in Columbus, Ind., after the house of worship was vandalized with the word “Infidels!” along with a Koranic verse sanctioning death for nonbelievers. Similar graffiti was found that same night at nearby Lakeview Church of Christ and East Columbus Christian Church.

St. Bartholomew Pastor Clem Davis said he doesn’t know if the threat was legitimate, but said little can be done to harden a target whose mission is to welcome all.

“I don’t know that there is any real protection against the ‘lone wolf’ mentality, not without infringing on everybody’s freedoms,” Davis said. “We don’t have metal detectors, people go in and out. Churches are family-orientated, public, tax-supported spaces; so they may appeal to some as a target.”

Synagogues have faced increasing threats in recent years, too. Earlier this year, the FBI disrupted a plot by a Muslim convert to blow up the Aventura Turnberry Jewish Center, in Aventura, Fla. A 2014 audit by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) found that anti-Semitic incidents rose 21 percent across the country that year.

Eastern Orthodox Christians, who in many cases suffered persecution at the hands of radical Muslims in their Middle Eastern homelands, believe they may be singled out because of their heritage. Mass at St. Andrew typically attracts up to 400 worshippers with roots in Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Russia and Greece.

“We have guards now; we never used to have guards,” said St. Andrew attendee Solomon Saddi, a Syrian-American Christian. “They keep an eye on everyone and talk to the faces that aren’t familiar,” he continued, referring to the aftermath of the April incident. “It is a very dangerous time for us even in America.”

In San Diego’s Iraqi-Christian community, known as Chaldeans, many local churches have had to dip into their collection baskets to hire security.

“There is a concern over attacks,” said a parishioner at St. Peter Chaldean Catholic Church. “Everyone knows that a church, especially like St. Peter, is a risk. But everyone tries not to let their fear get in the way of their faith.”

The July 26 murder of the Rev. Jacques Hamel, in the Normandy town of St.-Étienne-du-Rouvray sent shock waves around the world, and signaled to U.S. law enforcement that it could happen here, said Horace Frank, assistant commanding officer of the Counter-Terrorism and Special Operations Bureau of the Los Angeles Police Department.

“We see things happen in other countries and worry about them happening here,” Frank said. “You always have to be worried about copycats. That’s why we focus on prevention, trying to look ahead.”

Frank’s division works with Christian, Jewish, Muslim and Sikh groups to discuss such topics as terrorist reporting, suspicious activity and active shooter training. “We reach out to churches and they reach out to us. You have to be aware, you have to be vigilant,” Frank said. “It’s a concern not just in Christian communities, but all faith communities.” source


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 22, 2016, 08:46:50 pm
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/sunni-muslim-terrorists-coming-across-southern-united-states-border-with-ease-illegal-immigrants/

WHERE’S THAT WALL? Sunni Muslim Terrorists Coming Across Southern U.S. Border With Ease

“In 2015, we saw a total of 331,000 migrants enter the southwestern border between the U.S. and Mexico, of that we estimate more than 30,000 of those were from countries of terrorist concern,” she said.

8/22/16

Sunni Muslim extremists are infiltrating the United States with the help of alien smugglers in South America and are crossing U.S. borders with ease, according to a U.S. South Command intelligence report.

The Command’s J-2 intelligence directorate reported recently in internal channels that “special interest aliens” are working with a known alien smuggling network in Latin America to reach the United States. The smuggling network was not identified.

Army Col. Lisa A. Garcia, a Southcom spokeswoman, did not address the intelligence report directly but said Sunni terrorist infiltration is a security concern.

more


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on August 29, 2016, 09:44:51 pm
What a bunch of lies!

Canadian teachers instructed on how to combat 'Islamophobia'

A new teacher’s guide produced by the Canadian Human Rights Commission was launched last week in Canada, instructing Canadian teachers to actively combat views and comments it views as “Islamophobic.”

The new guide, entitled “Helping Students Deal With Trauma Related to Geopolitical Violence & Islamophobia,” was produced by the CHRC in conjunction with the National Council of Canadian Muslims and the Islamic Social Services Association.

The purpose of the new guide, say its producers, is to “help Canadian teachers better understand and provide support to students living with the effects of geopolitical violence and Islamophobia” and to “create safer and more inclusive spaces for Canadian Muslim students.”

The guide describes Muslims as the principle victim of terrorism world-wide, and condemns news media for portraying Muslims in a negative light, calling Islamophobia, “a form of self- imposed censorship on freedom of expression concerning geopolitical issues.”

Practically speaking, the new guide instructs teachers to “provide space for Muslim students to speak to their peers about their faith and about their feelings on world events that impact them,” as well as take classes on field trips to “various places of worship” to “help dispel stereotypes and misinformation about Islam,” among other suggested ways to “combat Islamophobia.”

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/217064


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 07, 2016, 11:49:27 am
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/obama-nominates-possible-first-muslim-american-judge-to-federal-court/ar-AAiB3Qq?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
Obama Nominates Possible First Muslim-American Judge to Federal Court
9/7/16

Muslim-American groups are applauding President Barack Obama's nomination of a Washington lawyer to serve in U.S. District Court — a move that could make him the first ever Muslim-American federal judge, according to advocates.

If confirmed, Abid Riaz Qureshi would sit on the District of Columbia's federal bench, the White House announced Tuesday. Qureshi, who graduated Harvard Law School in 1997, is a partner in the D.C. office of Latham & Watkins LLP, specializing in healthcare fraud, securities violations, and cases involving the False Claims Act, according to a White House statement.

"I am confident he will serve the American people with integrity and a steadfast commitment to justice," Obama said.

Muslim-American organizations hailed the historic announcement.

"The nomination of Abid Qureshi to fill a seat on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia sends a message of inclusion that is welcomed by the American Muslim community and by all Americans who value diversity and mutual respect at a time when some seek division and discord," Nihad Awad, national executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a civil rights group, said in a statement.

While Muslim Americans have filled roles as state judges, none have served at the federal trial or appellate levels, according to Muslim Advocates, a national legal advocacy organization.

"A judiciary that reflects the rich diversity of our nation helps ensure the fair and just administration of the law, and it is vital for American Muslims to be included," Farhana Khera, former counsel to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee and executive director of Muslim Advocates, said in a statement. "Mr. Qureshi's profound commitment to the rule of law and justice for people of all backgrounds makes him an exceptional nominee."

News of Qureshi's nomination comes amid a heated presidential race in which Muslims have found themselves the subject of much debate, including GOP nominee Donald Trump's proposal of a temporary ban on Muslims entering the country.


With a few months left before Obama's term ends, it remains unclear whether Quershi's nomination will make it out of Congress. Quershi did not immediately respond to a request for comment from NBC News Wednesday morning.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on November 19, 2016, 03:01:35 pm
Muslim Leader in US: “Islam is not here to Integrate. Islam is here to Dominate”

At least there is one Muslim in America who is open and honest about what Islam is and what it is here for. No taqiyya, no mincing of words. Islam is here to dominate.

Haitham Ibn Thbait, of the American chapter of Hizb Ut-Tahrir, told American Muslims earlier this year that Islam was not here to integrate, but rather to dominate.

“The Prophet said: ‘There is no god but Allah,’ said Thbait. “Instead the [elites of Mecca]rejected. They offered the Prophet wealth, status, and political representation – a seat on the executive branch within Mecca’s secular order – all to avoid this statement and its implications. Yet he rejected their offers and continued his journey towards radical change, providing us with step-by-step instructions on how to make this religion supreme.”

“The elites of Mecca would use every possible measure to coerce or contain Muhammad‘s call for change within specific parameters,” he added. “Those parameters would permit the changing of anything that did not threaten their system and infringe on their power. But this message is not here to integrate. It is here to dominate. Islam is here to dominate! This was an ideological struggle, the sole purpose of which was to organize Man’s affairs in accordance with a system revealed by Allah.”

“There was no room for compromise,” Thbait continued. “Instead Allah revealed to the Prophet, saying: ‘Proclaim openly, as commanded, and turn away from those who associate others with Allah.’ ‘Proclaim openly, as commanded by Allah’ – this is our activism. It is free of polytheism, the polytheism of a secular system. Activism within a flawed infidel system is forbidden.”

There is definitely a problem with polytheism in our land, but Islam will not help that since it is a flawed ideology that thrives on death, not life, and because it is an anti-christ religion at its heart.

He then said:

You cannot raise your hands to Allah, while extending your hands to men for legislation. Every four years, you do just that. Muslims are pressured to get out there and vote, believing somehow that their insignificant numbers have an impact. The effort to get Muslims out there to vote has never been about their significance. It is part of an effort to assimilate Muslims.

They have tricked Muslims into voting for Clinton, who went on to starve half a million children in Iraq to death. They tricked Muslims into voting for Bush, who went on to bomb two Muslim countries and kill millions. And they went on to trick Muslims to vote for Obama, who bombed seven Muslim countries and killed millions.

The argument used was always the “lesser of evils.” So now, killing millions of Muslims is a “lesser evil.” “What is the matter with you? How do you judge?” [Quran 68:36] The ballots have brought you nothing but disgrace, and have soaked you with the blood of your Muslim brothers and sisters. The problem with their system is not the scores of dead. It is deeper than that. It is their secular faith. It is in direct opposition with our creed, when Allah says: “Legislation belongs to none other than Allah.”

Muhammad and his companions established for us a political system where sovereignty belongs to Allah and not to the elites, where politics meant caring for the affairs of Mankind, not only the elites, where da’wa was conveyed to the whole of society, not only to the oppressed and excluding the elites. This system was not for the 99% or the 1%. This system was for the 100%. For those of us in the West, Allah granted us the opportunity to be amidst a people so misinformed that the truth we offer will resonate. Our voice is our greatest weapon, and our silence is our worst enemy.



They want to entice you and intimidate you into embracing their way of life. They want to change our Islam We are not their puppets. We are a cure and a mercy. We carry a comprehensive system of solutions for Mankind, and we should act accordingly. Muslims in the West are a part of this struggle. We should not underestimate our impact in this global effort. We need to be honest about who we are, what our global program is, and advocate for the system of Islam, wherever we may be, and explain it to Muslims and non-Muslims alike. Don’t fall into the electoral trap.

Some of what he says is true. This idea of being used is very true, not only of Muslims, but of many in our society. However, Islam does not offer truth. It offers lies. As for killing Muslims, perhaps one should follow the blood trail left by Islam, not just in this century, but in the previous nine!

While I do admire his conviction, it’s placed in the wrong thing. I wish more Christians understood their divine mandate and obeyed it (Matthew 28:19-20). I wish they understood that Christians are ambassadors for King Jesus and that He is dominating the world through the message we are to be teaching others (1 Corinthians 15).

Sadly, American Christians many times can’t even get the basics of the Gospel right. It is because we have lost our saltiness that we are being trampled underfoot in America (Matthew 5:13). May God renew us, even as He did Samson (Judges 16:28), and either cause our enemies to bow to Him or destroy them before us.

rest + VIDEO: http://thewashingtonstandard.com/muslim-leader-us-islam-not-integrate-islam-dominate/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on January 24, 2017, 08:00:36 pm
Trump To Sign Executive Order Restricting Immigration From Seven Countries


Having taken on the Keystone pipeline and America's struggling manufacturing sector in a flurry of executive actions on Tuesday, moments ago Reuters reported, citing several congressional aides and immigration experts briefed on the matter, that on Wednesday Donald Trump will sign several executive orders restricting immigration. The president is expected to sign the orders at the Washington headquarters of the Department of Homeland Security, whose responsibilities include immigration and border security.

Trump's orders are said to involve restricting access to the United States for refugees and some visa holders from seven mostly Muslim nations including Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

Additionally, Trump's restrictions on refugees are likely to include a multi-month ban on admissions from all countries until the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security can increase the intensity of the vetting process. According to AP, citing two admin officials, among the executive orders will be plans for building a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border and other enforcement measures.

During his presidential campaign, Trump initially proposed a temporary ban on Muslims entering the United States to protect Americans from jihadist attacks. Many Trump supporters decried Democratic President Barack Obama's decision to increase the number of Syrian refugees admitted to the United States over fears that those fleeing the country's civil war would carry out attacks. However, since then both Trump and his nominee for attorney general, Jeff Sessions, have said they would focus the restrictions on countries whose emigres could pose a threat rather than placing a ban on people who follow a specific religion.

As Reuters adds, to block entry from the designated countries, Trump is likely to instruct the U.S. State Department to stop issuing visas to people from those nations, according to sources familiar with the visa process. He could also instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to stop any current visa holders from those countries from entering the United States. White House spokesman Sean Spicer said on Tuesday that the State and Homeland Security departments would work on the vetting process once Trump's nominee to head the State Department, Rex Tillerson, is installed.

Other measures may include directing all agencies to finish work on a biometric identification system for non-citizens entering and exiting the United States and a crackdown on immigrants fraudulently receiving government benefits, according to the congressional aides and immigration experts.

While Trump has also promised to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border to restrict illegal immigration, and to deport illegal migrants living inside the United States, none of the orders to be signed Wednesday are expected to focus on those issues.

Trump is also expected to swear in his new secretary of homeland security, retired Marine General John Kelly, on Wednesday.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-24/trump-sign-executive-order-restricting-immigration-seven-nations


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on March 04, 2017, 03:06:16 am
San Francisco withdraws from FBI anti-terrorism network to appease Muslim objections

Law enforcement officials say that the city of San Francisco is weakening counter-terrorism efforts by withdrawing from the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force.

“After 9/11, Congress required U.S. law enforcement to increase the flow of intel between federal agencies and local police,” reported Shannon Bream of Fox News. “But in the wake of President Trump’s election, the San Francisco police department says it’s pulling out of the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force, and it’s cutting ties.”

“San Francisco says it doesn’t want it’s police gathering intelligence or surveilling Muslims or anyone else involved with political protests,” reported Will La Jeunesse, “or to keep records, and they fear that will happen illegally under President Trump. The critics say pulling out of the JTTF is short-sighted, and dangerous.”

“We’re prepared for a lot of different kinds of scenarios, but I just think that the one thing that we didn’t prepare for is, y’know, the Trump administration.” says San Francisco Board of Supervisors President London Breed, a Democrat.

“We are waiting and seeing every single say what the next move is coming out of our federal government,” said Mark Farrell, city supervisor, “and we need to do everything we can to stand up for our residents.”

Fox News reported that the change was made because of local activist groups that wanted to protect Muslims and Arabs from targeting by the Trump administration.

“In my opinion, the decision by the mayor and the police chief to withdraw the San Francisco Police Department from the JTTF is really narrow-minded,” said Mark Rossini, a retired FBI special agent, and founding executive of the National Counterterrorism Center, who served as a representative to the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center. “Politics aside, and the mayor and leaders of San Francisco have their right to their opinion, political opinion and beliefs. But when you’re working in law enforcement, law enforcement should know no politics.”
“What you lose when you take away the local police department is you lose that on-the-ground knowledge,” Mark told Fox News. “Information must flow both ways on these cases. That is vital. And that should transcend any political beliefs held by the mayor and or the administration of San Francisco.”

CAIR, the Muslim advocacy group, applauded the decision by San Francisco officials.

“After seven years of advocacy we welcome the suspension of SFPD participation in the JTTF,” said Brittney Rezaei, CAIR-SFBA Civil Rights Attorney. “As our concerns with the conduct of the federal government increase, we are happy to see our police department take this important step to ensure its commitment to protecting our community.”

“Joint Terrorism Task Forces have had a chilling effect on the First Amendment rights of Arab and Muslim communities throughout the country,” according to Nina Farnia, President of the San Francisco chapter of the National Lawyers Guild. “The Task Forces have led raids of activists’ homes and offices for merely engaging in the right to dissent. In the face of ever-increasing repression by the federal government, we applaud local agencies’ decision to suspend participation in the JTTF.”
San Francisco is the only city to have pulled out of the JTTF so far, according to Fox News. The city is also fighting the Trump administration over their “sanctuary city” policies that protect illegal aliens from deportation.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/03/03/san-francisco-withdraws-from-fbi-anti-terrorism-network-to-appease-muslim-objections/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on March 28, 2017, 11:29:34 pm
Muslim Professor Insists Jesus Wasn't Crucified, Christian Student Suspended After Disagreeing

A Christian college student has been suspended after allegedly challenging his Muslim professor’s claims that Jesus wasn’t crucified and that his disciples did not think he was God. Marshall Polston, a sophomore at Rollins College in Florida, was suspended after disagreeing with these assertions made by his professor, Areej Zufari, in his Middle Eastern humanities class, as reported by The College Fix.....

http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/27/muslim-prof-insists-jesus-wasnt-crucified-christian-student-suspended-after-disagreeing/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on March 31, 2017, 04:44:02 pm
NJ Middle School Mothers Hire Law Firm To Stop School From Islamic Curriculum Indoctrination
3/31/17
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/middle-school-mothers-hire-law-firm-stop-school-islamic-indoctrination-curriculum/

Two mothers of seventh graders who attend Chatham Middle School in New Jersey have hired the Thomas More Law Center, a public interest law firm, after their legitimate objections to pro-Islamic curriculum in their children’s classes have resulted in personal and social media attacks upon them within their community.

“For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;” 1 Timothy 2:5 (KJV)

EDITOR’S NOTE: Allah is not the “arabic word for God”, it is a generic term meaning “the god” who has no name. Not only that, Allah was only one of 360 gods in ancient Persian culture, and he was known as the “moon god”. Allah is not the God of the Bible, and as such is not the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob worshipped by both Jews and Christians. So to teach a curriculum in a public school that “Allah is the only god” is not only indoctrination, it is also a direct attack on the Bible from cover to cover, and against Christianity in particular.

“Their crime: appearing on Fox TV’s Tucker Carlson Show to voice concerns about Islamic indoctrination of Chatham Middle School seventh graders,” the Thomas More Law Center said in a press release on Thursday.
Concerned Mothers Voice Concerns Over Islam Being Taught in Schools on Tucker Carlson:

“Libby Hilsenrath and Nancy Gayer were subjected to personal attacks throughout their campaign to stop Islamic indoctrination at the Chatham Middle School. They were defamed as “bigots” and “Islamophobes”, “hateful”, “ignorant”, “xenophobes”, “intolerant”, “racist”, “closed minded”, “sad and ignorant” in social media, and the list goes on. The attacks significantly intensified after their appearance on the Tucker Carlson Show,” the statement continued:

    Libby Hilsenrath and Nancy Gayer, with sons in different classes in the seventh grade, [first] detailed their concerns in person to the Chatham Board of Education at their February 6, 2017 public meeting.

    Superintendent Michael LaSusa indicated that any change to the curriculum was unlikely, and the next day also refused their request to meet privately with him to discuss their concerns.

“The promotion of Islam is worse than what the mothers presented to Tucker Carlson,” Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center said.

“After viewing one of the videos which the seventh graders were directed to watch, I can’t imagine any objective person saying this is not Islamic indoctrination. Clueless school administrators across our nation are allowing this type of indoctrination to take place and it’s up to vigilant parents to stop it. Libby and Nancy should have been praised, not pilloried,” Thompson added.

more


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on April 14, 2017, 05:22:47 pm
'SHARIAH COP' CRACKS DOWN ON MINNESOTA MUSLIMS
Police 'monitor' Abdullah Rashid but don't arrest him

A 22-year-old Muslim convert has been denounced for trying to enforce Shariah law on Somali refugees living in Minneapolis, but he says he’s just trying to be a good Muslim and please Allah.

Abdullah Rashid married a Somali woman and moved from his hometown in Walton County, Georgia, to Wyoming and then on to Minnesota last year. Formerly Devon James Miller, Rashid now dresses in traditional Islamic headdress. But when he isn’t in a turban, he wears a green uniform with a patch marking him as the “religious police.”

That’s causing quite a stir, even in the Muslim enclave of Minneapolis’s Cedar Riverside community.

In a recent interview with the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Rashid said he aims to turn the city’s Cedar-Riverside area into a “sharia-controlled zone” where Muslims are learning about the proper practices of Islam and that “non-Muslims are asked to respect” it, the paper reported.

He pays regular visits to Somali households and makes sure the women are dressed in compliance with Islamic law, that no alcohol is being consumed and that nobody is interacting with the opposite sex. He is performing, in his mind, a service similar to that of the morality police who enforce Shariah in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Somalia or the Islamic State.

He claims to have 10 other men working under him to patrol the Cedar Riverside community.

There’s one problem: While Rashid says he is just trying to be a good Muslim and do right by Allah, this isn’t Saudi Arabia, or Somalia.

“People who don’t know me would say I’m a terrorist,” he told the local newspaper. “I’m someone who’s dedicated to Islam and trying to help the community all ways I can.”

Local Muslim leaders told the Star-Tribune they are working to stop Rashid’s group, the General Presidency of the Religious Affairs and Welfare of the Ummah, while providing no evidence that they are serious about stopping him.

Minneapolis is home to the nation’s largest community of Somali refugees, which have been arriving weekly in the U.S. since the early 1990s, most coming through United Nations refugee camps.

Just last week, WND reported the Somalis have taken over politics in the sixth ward in Minneapolis, providing a video that showed their caucus event turning into bloody chaos.

Rashid has encountered some backlash, even from other Muslims who may not yet be ready for full compliance with various aspects of Shariah law, or who know it would do long-term damage to Islam’s reputation in America if Muslims try to implement Shariah too early.

Rashid has been questioned by Minneapolis police who say they are “monitoring” his actions.

He has been condemned as out of line by local Muslim leaders, according to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, which turned to the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, for the authoritative word on Shariah.

“What he’s doing is wrong and doesn’t reflect the community at all,” Jaylani Hussein, executive director of CAIR Minnesota, told the Star-Tribune. CAIR, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, is an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror-financing trial held in 2007-08 in Dallas and which has seen several of its leaders convicted of terrorism-related crimes.

Minneapolis police started receiving reports in February of Rashid making unannounced visits to Somali homes. So far, they have not found reason to arrest him.

“We’ve had conversations with community members that live over there,” Officer Corey Schmidt, a police spokesman, told the Star-Tribune. “Sometimes it takes a little bit of time to deal with it, but it’s something we’ve been monitoring.”

There are other troubling aspects to Rashid’s mission, such as his display of the al-Qaida flag and his adoration of Anwar al-Awlaki, the American-born imam of Yemeni descent who was a spiritual leader of al-Qaida before he was killed in Yemen by a drone strike ordered by President Obama.

His Somali wife, Kadro Abdullahi, said Rashid is not mentally ill and that she supports his work.

“He’s a man with a good personality and he loves Islam,” Abdullahi told the Star-Tribune.

On his website, Rashid posted a video by Anwar al-Awlaki titled “Never Trust Non-Muslims.”

On the same day the Star-Tribune reported a Shariah enforcer is making house visits in Minneapolis, the Detroit News reported a female Muslim doctor in Detroit was arrested on federal charges that she was performing female genital mutilations on girls as young as 7.

rest: http://www.wnd.com/2017/04/shariah-cop-cracks-down-on-minnesota-muslims/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Mark on May 14, 2017, 06:02:09 pm
Rebellion grows against Muslim indoctrination in schools

From coast to coast, parents are rebelling against what they describe as Islamic indoctrination of their children in public schools.

In Florida, for example, parents are protesting a newly approved textbook they say whitewashes Islam’s violent history of conquest and subjugation, while in San Diego, an angry father confronted the city’s school board about its partnership with the controversial Council on American-Islamic Relations in an “anti-bullying” program.

The Brevard County School Board in Florida has revised a history textbook that had been condemned by some parents for its selective treatment of Islam, but the new edition still has its critics, reported WKMG-TV in Orlando. The board decided Tuesday night by a 5-0 voted to adopt the ninth-grade 2018 World History book published by Pearson Prentice Hall.

The local chapter of the activist group ACT for America pressed for the revision in an effort “to protect against indoctrination,” arguing the section about Islam ignored the religion’s “true history” and painted Muhammad and the treatment of women favorably.

ACT for America’s local leader, Roger Gangitano, told WKMG the new edition is an improvement, but the “problem remains that Islam is being portrayed in a far more favorable light than what would be 100 percent accurate,” with parents calling it partially “incorrect,” “incomplete” and “slanted.”

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, is also engaged in the Florida dispute. But the FBI cut off relations with the group after it was designated by the Justice Department as an unindicted co-conspirator in a terror-funding plot. Later, an Arab Gulf state designated CAIR as a terrorist organization.

Nevertheless, Rasha Mubarak, Orlando Regional Coordinator of the Florida chapter of CAIR, entered the fray, asserting ACT is “using our students for their one intention and that is to push their anti-Islamic agenda.”

Meanwhile, in an initiative to “combat Islamophobia and the bullying of Muslims students,” the San Diego Unified School District, as WND reported, has formed a partnership with CAIR.

In a late April school board meeting, the Blaze reported, parent Christopher Wyrick confronted the San Diego school board about the Islamic instruction attached to the program and its relationship with the Islamic group.

CAIR has sued the authors of a WND Books exposé, “Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America,” which documented the group’s radical ties. A trial in the case is expected to commence this fall.

Wyrick told the board he’s held “many titles” over the years, but “one of them I will not accept is ‘infidel.'”

“There has been an argument over the years to keep religious beliefs out of school, especially any that happen to be associated with Judaism or Christianity,” he said. “So at what point did you decide that it was OK to teach my children about Islam?”

He asked how the board could “justify spending our tax dollars on a program that’s meant to educate our kids on the Muslim religion specifically, yet only accounts for a very, very small portion of the harassment reported?”

He asked how CAIR, which has “ties to terrorists like Hamas,” could have an “ear on this board” and “implement its propaganda and hate speech into our schools in an effort to brainwash the minds of the young.”

Earlier in the meeting, Board Trustee Kevin Beiser said the Islam policy is a step toward protecting all children from bullying, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported.

“We will not allow Muslim students in San Diego schools to be spit on,” Beiser said.

The San Diego paper said he was shouted down by those in attendance.

“All students should be safe,” one person said, the Union-Tribune reported, and another added: “What about the Jews?”

‘The true faith, Islam’

Last week, a Groesbeck, Texas, couple moved their sixth-grade daughter to a new school after they discovered her history homework assignment on Islam.

In one assignment, students were asked to list the five tenets of Islam required for salvation, reported KWTX-TV in Waco, Texas.

“It’s just they’ve taken God and other things out of the schools but yet they’re going to push this in there secretly to me and I don’t think it’s right,” the mother said.

In late March, as WND reported, a middle school in Chatham, New Jersey, was using a cartoon video to teach the Five Pillars of Islam to seventh-grade students, prompting two parents to obtain legal services to fight the school district, which has ignored their concerns.

Seventh graders in this school are taught: “May God help us all find the true faith, Islam.”

Also taught in the video is the Shahada, which is the Muslim prayer of conversion “There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger.”
The parents say no other religion is taught nearly to this level of detail in the “world cultures and geography” class.

Teaching the five pillars of Islam also created an uproar in Summerville, South Carolina, and in Loganville, Georgia, last year.

WND also reported in March a high school in Frisco, Texas, has set up an Islamic prayer room specifically for Muslim students to pray on campus during school hours. The same type of prayer rooms have been set up in high schools in St. Cloud, Minnesota, and other school districts.

In 2015, parents in Tennessee asked the governor, legislature and state education department to investigate pro-Islam bias in textbooks and other materials.

A complaint by the group Proclaiming Justice to The Nations said a presentation on Islam included “multiple misleading statements including the glorification of jihad against infidels as a reason why many easily convert to Islam.”

It also featured the Shahada, the Muslim prayer of faith, and “mentions nothing about the historically negative aspects and actions of the religion, including the 9/11 attacks.”

‘Historical revisionism’

WND reported in 2012 ACT for America conducted an analysis of 38 textbooks used in the sixth through 12th grades in public schools and found that since the 1990s, discussions of Islam are taking up more and more pages, while the space devoted to Judaism and Christianity has simultaneously decreased.

The late conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly wrote in 2012 of a double standard in public school teaching.

“Drop Christianity down the memory hole but give extensive and mostly favorable coverage to Islam,” she wrote. “Even the mainstream media have provided extensive coverage of the steady stream of court cases and threatening letters from the American Civil Liberties Union aimed at removing all signs of Judeo-Christianity from public schools.”

Textbooks, she said, “generally give a false description of women’s rights under Islam.”

“The books don’t reveal that women are subject to polygamy, a husband’s legal right to beat her, genital mutilation and the scandalous practice misnamed ‘honor killings,’ which allows a man to murder a daughter who dares to date a Christian,” she said.

“Slavery is usually a favorite topic for the liberals, but historical revisionism is particularly evident in the failure to mention the Islamic slave trade. It began nearly eight centuries before the European-operated Atlantic slave trade and continues in some Muslim areas even today.”

In 2009, Gilbert T. Sewall, director of the American Textbook Council, a group that reviews history books, told Fox News the texts were sugarcoating Islamic extremism.

“Key subjects like jihad, Islamic law, the status of women are whitewashed,” Sewall said.

Sewall said publishers have downplayed Islamic connections with terrorism.

“The picture is incomplete … and the reason for this is that publishers are afraid of the Islamist activists. They don’t want trouble,” he said.

Sewall noted the text “World History: The Modern World,” published by Pearson Prentice Hall, doesn’t mention the religion of the 9/11 hijackers, simply calling them a “teams of terrorists.”

Jihad about ‘funding medical research’?

Also in 2009, WND reported the middle school textbook “History Alive! The Medieval World and Beyond,” published by Teachers’ Curriculum Institute, said an Islamic “jihad” is an effort by Muslims to convince “others to take up worthy causes, such as funding medical research.”

And even at its most violent, “jihad” simply is Muslims fighting “to protect themselves from those who would do them harm,” says the book.

A parent whose child has been handed the text in a Sacramento-area district said at the time in a letter to WND noted that seven of the book’s chapters deal with Islam or Muslim subjects.

In 2006, WND reported a school in Oregon taught Islam by having students study and learn Muslim prayers and dress as Muslims. A parent told WND her 13-year-old son was being “indoctrinated that Islam is a religion of peace, and being dressed up as a Muslim, being taught prayers, and scriptures out of the Quran.”

“I just don’t understand the ban on Christianity but Islam has free rein,” she said.

WND reported in 2003 a prominent Muslim leader who eventually was convicted on terror-related charges helped write the “Religious Expression in Public Schools” guidelines issued by President Clinton during his tenure in office.

Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was president of the American Muslim Council and a supporter of Hamas and Hezbollah, worked with President Clinton and the American Civil Liberties Union when the guidelines that later were used by a federal judge to conclude such teaching was legal were compiled.

Observing Ramadan

In 2001, shortly after the 9/11 attacks, seventh graders in Byron, California, were taught a three-week course on Islam that required them to learn 25 Islamic terms, 20 proverbs, Islam’s Five Pillars of Faith, 10 key Islamic prophets and disciples, recite from the Quran, wear a robe during class, adopt a Muslim name and stage their own “holy war” in a dice game.

The school, Excelsior, used a textbook that omitted information about Islam conquest and cruelties against Christians and Jews. Christianity was mentioned only briefly and negatively, linked to the Inquisition and to Salem witch hunts.

The students were given Muslim names and told to recite Muslim prayers in class. They were required to recognize the Islamic practice of Ramadan by giving up something for a day, and the teacher gave extra credit for fasting at lunch.

For the final exam, the students had to write an essay about Islamic culture. The essay assignment warned students: “Be careful here; if you do not have something positive to say, don’t say anything!!!”

Parents went to court to uphold their right to reject the class for their children, but a federal just ruled against them, and in 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to consider their appeal.

http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/rebellion-grows-against-muslim-indoctrination-in-schools/


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on June 10, 2017, 05:22:43 pm
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/muslim-plan-make-america-sharia-nation-americans-forced-convert-islam/
The Muslim Plan To Make America A Sharia Nation With All Americans Forced To Convert To Islam
The Islamic plan to turn Americans into Muslims and install Sharia Law in the United States did not begin with Barack Obama, even though it felt like it at the time. In reality, as you can see in this C-SPAN video from 1989, the plan has been in the works for quite a while.

6/10/17

Hamtramck, Michigan is officially the only city in America where Muslims form a majority after immigration from Bangladesh, Yemen and Bosnia. It is now welcoming Syrian refugees despite the Michigan governor wanting none in his state.

In all of human history, there have only ever been two religious political systems that have ever forcibly converted people at the edge of the sword. The Roman Catholic Church and Islam. When these groups are in the minority they are quiet and peaceable, when they are in the majority they are brutal dictators. To see how the Vatican did it, read a few pages of Foxe’s Book Of Martyrs, and to see how Islam is doing it right now, continue reading this article.
The plan to make Americans Muslim and install Sharia Law:

The Islamic plan to turn Americans into Muslims and install Sharia Law in the United States did not begin with Barack Obama, even though it felt like it at the time. In reality, as you can see in this C-SPAN video from 1989, the plan has been in the works for quite a while. This Muslim woman is speaking very honestly and openly, you should listen to her and believe what she’s telling you.

Goal radical Muslims have 4 America!Their plan is not 2 assimilate into American way, but to transform USA 🇺🇸 Muslim ! @seanhannity pic.twitter.com/WF7n48YSPO

— Dr.Estella Sneider (@DrEstella) June 10, 2017

Barack Obama’s speech to the Muslim world in Cairo:

Pres. Obama delivered a speech on U.S.-Muslim relations from Cairo University. The President called for renewed Middle East peace talks as well as an agenda for economic and social development in the region. At least that’s what the official press blurb said. In reality, it was a one-hour bow to the Muslim world.

Make no mistake about it, when Muslims are small in number they are usually peaceful and quiet. But when their numbers in their host nations rise, they get very aggressive. As the Muslim population of Detroit has swelled, no-go zones in our own country have been created, and even the police are afraid to go in there.
Inside Hamtramck, America’s only Muslim-majority city:

Hamtramck, Michigan is officially the only city in America where Muslims form a majority after immigration from Bangladesh, Yemen and Bosnia. It is now welcoming Syrian refugees despite the Michigan governor wanting none in his state.

Muslim Majority – Hamtramck Has First Of Its Kind City Council:

Sharia Law in Dearborn Michigan:

Even with taking the terrorism aspect out of it, when Muslims exist in large numbers in America they take over whole city blocks for “daily prayer”, and they blast their Call To Prayer from loudspeakers 5 times per day. Why? Because the world Islam means “submission”, it does not mean “peace”.
Ten Obvious Reasons Why Islam is Not a Religion of Peace

#1: 18,000 deadly terror attacks committed explicitly in the name of Islam in just the last ten years. (Other religions combined for perhaps a dozen or so).
#2: Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, had people killed for insulting him or for criticizing his religion. This included women. Muslims are told to emulate the example of Muhammad.
#3: Muhammad said in many places that he has been “ordered by Allah to fight men until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is his messenger.” In the last nine years of his life, he ordered no less than 65 military campaigns to do exactly that. Muhammad inspired his men to war with the basest of motives, using captured loot, sex and a gluttonous paradise as incentives. He beheaded captives,enslaved children and raped women captured in battle. Again, Muslims are told to emulate the example of Muhammad.
#4: After Muhammad died, the people who lived with him and knew his religion best immediately fell into war with each other. Fatima, Muhammad’s favorite daughter, survived the early years among the unbelievers at Mecca safe and sound, yet died of stress from the persecution of fellow Muslims only six months after her father died. She even miscarried Muhammad’s grandchild after having her ribs broken by the man who became the second caliph.It was the same caliph, Umar, who ordered the death of the first convert to Islam at Medina, an elderly leader who became a close companion to Muhammad and proved his worth in battle. Sa’d ibn Ubadah was killed after a failed bid to be caliph. Fatima’s husband Ali, who was the second convert to Islam and was raised like a son to Muhammad, fought a civil war against an army raised by Aisha, Muhammad’s favorite wife – and one whom he had said was a “perfect woman.” 10,000 Muslims were killed in a single battle waged less than 25 years after Muhammad’s death.

Three of the first four Muslim rulers (caliphs) were murdered. All of them were among Muhammad’s closest companions. The third caliph was killed by allies of the son of the first (who was murdered by the fifth caliph a few years later, then wrapped in the skin of a dead donkey and burned). The fourth caliph (Ali) was stabbed to death after a bitter dispute with the fifth. The fifth caliph went on to poison one of Muhammad’s two favorite grandsons. The other grandson was later beheaded by the sixth caliph.

The infighting and power struggles between Muhammad’s family members, closest companions and their children only intensified with time. Within 50 short years of Muhammad’s death, even the Kaaba, which had stood for centuries under pagan religion, lay in ruins from internal Muslim war…And that’s just the fate of those within the house of Islam!
#5: Muhammad directed Muslims to wage war on other religions and bring them under submission to Islam. Within the first few decades following his death, his Arabian companions invaded and conquered Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist and Zoroastrian lands. A mere 25 years after Muhammad’s death, Muslim armies had captured land and people within the borders of over 28 modern countries outside of Saudi Arabia.
#6: Muslims continued their Jihad against other religions for 1400 years, checked only by the ability of non-Muslims to defend themselves. To this day, not a week goes by that Islamic fundamentalists do not attempt to kill Christians, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists explicitly in the name of Allah. None of these other religions are at war with each other.
#7: Islam is the only religion that has to retain its membership by formally threatening to kill anyone who leaves. This is according to the example set by Muhammad.
#8: Islam teaches that non-Muslims are less than fully human. Muhammad said that Muslims can be put to death for murder, but that a Muslim could never be put to death for killing a non-Muslim.
#9: The Quran never once speaks of Allah’s love for non-Muslims, but it speaks of Allah’s cruelty toward and hatred of non-Muslims more than 500 times.
#10: “Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar!” (The last words from the cockpit of Flight 93)


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on June 30, 2017, 08:36:42 am
http://truthfeed.com/first-muslim-governor-in-2018-may-be-imminent-look-what-state-hes-running-in/86600/

First Muslim Governor In 2018 May Be Imminent – Look What State He’s Running In
Politics By TruthFeedNews June 30, 2017

An Egyptian-American doctor who is Anti-Trump is set to run for Governor of Michigan in 2018.

If successful, he will become the first Muslim Governor the United States has ever seen.

From DML

Abdul El-Sayed, 32, a Rhodes scholar, was appointed as executive director of the Detroit Department of Health & Wellness Promotion in 2015. El-Sayed recently resigned from his post to run his gubernatorial campaign in Michigan.

If elected, he would face the major water and economic crises in Detroit and Flint, the two poorest cities in the country.

El-Sayed has officially announced his campaign, claiming that the time to act is now and that Michigan’s shared future is what unites its people.

The would-be governor said his focus “is, has always been, and always will be people, their opportunities, their passions, their perspectives. The things that we can do for them, together”

“My work has always been about building and leading the kinds of institutions that create opportunity for real people by breaking down barriers they face,” he said. “That work has never been more important than it is today. The politics of fear and hatred threaten to divide us.”

During a speech to a crowd at Detroit’s Eastern Market, El-Sayed said that some people believe they can make the country great again by claiming that people who “look like me” do not belong here and that they should not get involved.

“We are not sitting on the sidelines,” he said. “We must act. We cannot wait until our children are poisoned or their schools are shut down.”

El-Sayed, who holds a doctorate in public health, is known in Detroit as a strong leader in the fight for environmental justice. He has noted that his platform will reflect his values of equity and inclusion.

According to El-Sayed, his decision to run was influenced by concerns over state leadership following the lead-tainted water crisis in Flint, as well as policies being implemented in Washington, D.C., under President Trump.

El-Sayed is not a fan of Trump, and claims citizens of his state are having “buyer’s remorse.” In a separate interview, he claimed that Trump’s decisions “are at odds with deeply held American values, and distractions from real issues.”


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 10, 2017, 03:57:15 pm
http://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/Linda-Sarsour-calls-for-jihad-against-American-government-499039
Linda Sarsour calls for 'jihad' against American government
ByAriane Mandell
July 7, 2017 04:37
"Do not criticize me when I say that we as a Muslim community in these United States of America have to be perpetually outraged."

In a largely self-congratulatory speech to the Annual Islamic Society of North American (ISNA) this past weekend, Palestinian-American activist Linda Sarsour called for the "best form" of jihad against the current American administration.

"A word of truth in front of a tyrant ruler or leader, that is the best form of jihad," Sarsour declared. "And I hope that we, when we stand up to those who oppress our communities, that Allah accepts from us that as a form of jihad. That we are struggling against tyrants and rulers, not only abroad in the Middle East or on the other side of the world, but here, in these United States of America, where you have fascists, and white supremacists, and Islamophobes reigning in the White House."

Sarsour has been a prominent face among left-wing activists, in particular since the election of US President Donald Trump. She was one of the organizers of the January “Women’s March on Washington” held the day after Trump’s inauguration.

But she has come under fire for many of her stances and comments, including her support of the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel. She has said “Nothing is creepier than Zionism,” that Zionism and feminism are incompatible, and has warmly embraced Rasmea Odeh, a convicted terrorist involved in a 1969 bombing that killed two students.

In her speech to ISNA, Sarsour said that since Islamophobes do not stop to ask Muslims in the street about their political or religious persuasions before attacking, since Islamophobes do not distinguish between different types of Muslims, so the American Muslim community must band together united. She also said that since the Muslim community is heavily outnumbered in the US, they must ally themselves with other minorities if they hope to have any agency on a national scale.

"Why are we so afraid of this administration and the potential chaos that they will ensue upon our community?" she asked. "And we already saw their potential when they come out every few weeks - Muslim ban 1, Muslim ban 2, Muslim ban 3... they are relentless, they are persistent, and consistent, and want to see how much we as a community can endure, and want to see who our friends are, and how hard we're going to fight back against this administration."

She called on the Muslim community to organize around building itself up from every angle, but scolded them against wandering outside of their comfort zones. "We gotta stay in our lanes. If you are not a communications specialist, then you are not to be advising our community on how to communicate with the rest of the public."

"We have to stay outraged," she insisted to applause. "Do not criticize me when I say that we as a Muslim community in these United States of America have to be perpetually outraged every single... when I wake up in the morning, and I remember who's sitting in the White House, I am outraged. This is not normal, Sisters and Brothers. Those people sitting in the most powerful seats in this country is not normal. So, do not ever be those citizens that normalize this administration, because when they day comes that something horrific happens to us or to another community, you will be responsible for normalizing this administration."


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 12, 2017, 01:30:03 pm
http://truthfeed.com/chicago-muslim-woman-who-murdered-her-baby-escapes-jail-time/90526/

Chicago Muslim Woman Who MURDERED HER BABY Escapes Jail Time
Breaking News By TruthFeedNews July 12, 2017

How on EARTH could this woman MURDER HER BABY in cold blood and NOT get a single day of jail time?

We suspect the liberal judge was being “politically correct” and extra lenient because she is a muslim.

She should NOT be back allowed into society where she could choose to KILL AGAIN.

From DailyMail

A woman who dropped her newborn from a window in her high-rise apartment to hide her pregnancy from her parents has been sentenced to probation.

Mubashra Uddin, 20, was sentenced to four years’ probation after pleading guilty to involuntary manslaughter of a family member in Cook County Court in Chicago, Illinois, on Thursday.

She was originally charged with first-degree murder in the 2015 death of her infant, named in official documents a Baby Jane Uddin.

Uddin dropped Baby Jane from a window in her eighth floor Chicago apartment after she had given birth on November 11, 2015, so that her parents would not find out about her pregnancy. The baby died about an hour later.

Though she was initially jailed without bond, Cook County Judge Carol Howard reduced Uddin’s bail last year to $275,000, according to the Chicago Tribune.

Uddin eventually posted bond and was released. She lived with her parents and was on electronic monitoring.

She was given credit for serving 603 days in jail and was sentenced to at least 48 months’ probation at her sentencing Thursday.

She did not tell her parents, who are Pakistani Muslim, that she became pregnant by her boyfriend because she knew they would not approve, assistant state attorney Patrick Turnock said at the time.

Uddin gave birth around 11.20pm to a full-term seven pound 11 ounce girl in a bedroom she shared with her younger sister.

When she heard her mother approach the room, Uddin dropped the girl out of the bedroom window.

The DeVry University student had only told her boyfriend and another friend that she was pregnant.

She hid the pregnancy from her family by wearing clothing that concealed the bump, according to Turnrock.

Baby Jane was still alive when she was found by a man in the grass outside the high-rise in the Uptown neighborhood just before midnight.

The man who found the newborn baby girl asked security at the building to call an ambulance and wrapped the bloody and naked child in shirts and two baby blankets he retrieved from his home nearby.

The baby girl suffered extensive injuries, including fractures to her skull, spine and ribs, a broken shoulder, and a lacerated liver and bowel.

She was taken to Weiss Memorial Hospital, just a block from the apartment building.

Baby Jane was pronounced dead at 12.25am Thursday.

Her death was ruled a homicide by blunt-force trauma, according to the Cook County medical examiner’s office.

When police went to Uddin’s apartment, officers found blood in the bedroom and bathroom as well as on sheets and a pair of scissors.

Investigators said Uddin made ‘multiple admissions’ on video.

Judge Peggy Chiampas said the teenager’s family circumstances will be considered during the case.

Uddin was arrested a day after her baby died.


Title: Re: Sharia taking over one State at a time!
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 14, 2017, 01:54:44 pm
https://conservativedailypost.com/sharia-patrol-grows-to-triple-digits-as-police-fail-to-contain-migrant-crisis/

Sharia Patrol Grows To Triple Digits As Police Fail To Contain Migrant Crisis

Posted by Luis Orozco | Jul 10, 2017 | National Security

While there are world leaders who seem to ignore the threats of Europe’s migrant crisis, there are others like Angela Merkel who simply doesn’t care about getting her country harmed by the consequences of this issue in the name of multiculturalism.

Under her watch, millions of Muslim migrants have flooded Germany over the last few years. Amid a spike in rapes and many other crimes, there’s another frightening trend that is emerging within Europe’s largest economy thanks to its open borders policy and its unwillingness to acknowledge the threats of Islam: Sharia Police.

According to local police who are investigating a recent string of violence assaults in Berlin, a hundred Islamists are now openly enforcing Sharia law on the streets of the German capital. The self-appointed morality police involve Salafists from Chechnya, which is a Sunni Muslim region in Russia.

more