End Times and Current Events

General Category => Current Events => Topic started by: Psalm 51:17 on September 12, 2012, 10:40:31 am



Title: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 12, 2012, 10:40:31 am
http://news.yahoo.com/u-ambassador-libya-three-staff-killed-rocket-attack-091505030.html

9/12/12

.
U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi attack
By Hadeel Al Shalchi | Reuters – 1 hr 16 mins ago.

BENGHAZI, Libya (Reuters) - The U.S. ambassador to Libya and three embassy staff were killed as they rushed away from a consulate building in Benghazi, stormed by al Qaeda-linked gunmen blaming America for a film that they said insulted the Prophet Mohammad.
 
Gunmen had attacked and set fire to the U.S. consulate in the eastern city of Benghazi, the cradle of last year's uprising against Muammar Gaddafi's 42-year rule, late on Tuesday evening as another assault was mounted on the U.S. embassy in Cairo.
 
The California-born ambassador, Christopher Stevens, was trying to leave the consulate building for a safer location as part of an evacuation when gunmen launched an intense attack, apparently forcing security personnel to withdraw.
 
"The American ambassador and three staff members were killed when gunmen fired rockets in their direction," a Libyan official in Benghazi told Reuters. Airport sources said the bodies were due to be flown from Benghazi to Tripoli.

more


Title: Re: U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi attack
Post by: Boldhunter on September 12, 2012, 12:47:23 pm
Can you that have more historical facts shed some light on what it means that Venezuela denounced the human rights amendments made in May this year by OAS?

More info in this article :

 http://venezuelanalysis.com/news/7011


Title: Re: U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi attack
Post by: Kilika on September 12, 2012, 04:08:37 pm
Apparently they are sending in some Marines to Libya.

http://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2012/09/12/marines-headed-to-libya-to-reinforce-security (http://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2012/09/12/marines-headed-to-libya-to-reinforce-security)

Quote
Marines headed to Libya to reinforce security
September 12, 2012


By ROBERT BURNS, Associated Press
 
WASHINGTON — Some 50 U.S. Marines headed to Libya on Wednesday to reinforce security at U.S. diplomatic facilities in the aftermath of an attack in the eastern city of Benghazi that killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans, officials said.

The Marines are members of an elite group known as a Fleet Antiterrorism Security Team, or FAST, whose role is to respond on short notice to terrorism threats and to reinforce security at U.S. embassies. They operate worldwide. The contingent that was dispatched to Libya was based in Spain.
 
The officials who disclosed the plan to send the Marines spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. The Marines were headed initially to the U.S. embassy in Tripoli, not to Benghazi.
 
Several officials said the U.S. military was making no other moves to deploy troops, ships or aircraft in response to Tuesday’s attack. A second Marine FAST element was standing by in Spain but had no orders to move, officials said.
 
U.S. embassies, particularly in major countries and in unstable or less secure nations, usually have a resident contingent of Marine security guards. Early indications were that there were not at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. A consulate is a branch office in major cities outside the capital. These guards work under the supervision of the senior diplomatic officer at an embassy.
 
The main role of Marine security guards is to protect classified national security documents, according to the website of the Marine Corps Embassy Security Group, which administers the security guard mission from a Marine base in Virginia. Their secondary role is to protect U.S. citizens and U.S. government property in the event of an emergency...

(cont.)


Title: Re: U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi attack
Post by: Mark on September 12, 2012, 07:14:30 pm
yep religion of peace...


Title: US officials say 2 warships moving toward Libya
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 12, 2012, 11:17:43 pm
http://news.yahoo.com/us-officials-2-warships-moving-toward-libya-231547807.html

9/12/12

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon ordered two warships to the Libyan coast in the aftermath of the attack in Benghazi that killed the U.S. ambassador and three others, U.S. officials said Wednesday.
 
One destroyer, the USS Laboon, moved to a position off the coast Wednesday, and the USS McFaul is en route and should be stationed off the coast within days. The officials said the ships, which carry Tomahawk cruise missiles, do not have a specific mission. But they give commanders flexibility to respond to any mission ordered by the president.
 
Pentagon spokesman George Little said: "Without commenting on specific ship movements, the United States military regularly takes precautionary steps when potential contingencies might arise in a given situation. That's not only logical in certain circumstances, it's the prudent thing to do."
 
There have been four destroyers in the Mediterranean for some time. These moves will increase that to five.
 
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss troop movements.

more


Title: Re: U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi attack
Post by: Mark on September 13, 2012, 06:00:30 am
9/11: AMERICANS KILLED IN LIBYA...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2201780/Christopher-Stevens-death-US-ambassador-killed-attack-Libya.html

ATTACK 'COORDINATED'...
http://wtop.com/215/3033617/Officials-Embassy-attack-in-Libya-was-coordinated

CIA SAW NO THREATS...
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2012/09/197694.htm

FOR FIVE HOURS, NO ONE KNEW WHERE AMBASSADOR WAS...
http://abcnews.go.com/International/libya-consulate-hit-attacks-lasted-hours/story?id=17215154#.UFEXBaO6n9Y

BODY NOT RECOVERED FOR 12 HOURS...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/12/gunfire-then-missing-ambassador-officials-describe-chaotic-scene-at-benghazi/

OBAMA WENT TO SLEEP NOT KNOWING WHAT WAS HAPPENING THERE...
http://www.latimes.com/news/la-mobile-christopher-stevens-killed-m,0,2291982.story

**WARNING** **GRAPHIC PHOTO**...
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/american_ambassador_others_killed_uvtJF2mvUd6CzlMsrh169K

Romney campaign links attacks to failed Middle East policies...
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/09/12/romney_campaign_links_embassy_attacks_to_obama_s_failed_middle_east_policies

White House gave 'mixed signals'...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/decision2012/mitt-romneys-statement-on-the-libya-ambassador-attack/2012/09/12/3d314562-fceb-11e1-b153-218509a954e1_story.html

Marines Headed to Libya to Reinforce Security...
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444426404577647060576633348.html?mod=WSJ_Home_largeHeadline

NEW CLASHES OUTSIDE US EMBASSY IN CAIRO...
http://rt.com/news/cairo-clashes-us-embassy-013/

Al Qaeda Releases New Video of American Hostage...
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/al-qaeda-releases-video-american-hostage/story?id=17221075

CALLS TO STRIP FUNDING FROM EGYPT, LIBYA...
http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/middle-east-north-africa/249071-house-conservatives-consider-stripping-foreign-aid-to-libya-from-spending-bill

PAPER: How Media Turned Obama's Foreign Policy Bungle into a Romney Gaffe...
http://washingtonexaminer.com/how-the-media-turned-obamas-foreign-policy-bungle-into-a-romney-gaffe/article/2507779

Open mic catches reporters coordinating questions...
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/press-coordinates-question-ask-romney_652241.html

REPORT: Egypt orders legal action in US against Prophet film makers...
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4280756,00.html


Title: Re: U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi attack
Post by: Mark on September 13, 2012, 08:07:43 am
Thanx Obama, want to apologize some more for America against your oh so peaceful muslim friends?

State Dept alerts travelers...
http://travel.usatoday.com/destinations/dispatches/post/2012/09/us-state-dept-alerts-travelers-in-wake-of-embassy-protests/70000205/1

RAGE AGAINST AMERICA
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/13/us-protests-idUSBRE88C0J320120913


Protesters storm American embassy in Yemen...
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/14/world/middleeast/mideast-turmoil-spreads-to-us-embassy-in-yemen.html?_r=1

New Clashes in Cairo...
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/13/us-egypt-protest-idUSBRE88C0BP20120913

Warning spreads to 7 countries...
http://www.wtop.com//289/3033705/Embassies-in-7-countries-warn-of-possible-attacks

Consulate in Berlin evacuated...
http://www.wkrn.com/story/19532170/us-consulate-in-berlin-evacuated-as-precaution

Iraqi militia threatens U.S. interests...
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/13/us-iraq-usa-threat-idUSBRE88C0CK20120913

'The Most Serious Challenge to Obama'...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/libya-attack-represents-challenge-for-obama/2012/09/12/a946d0b6-fcfd-11e1-a31e-804fccb658f9_story.html

Al Qaeda leader urges support for ousting Syria's Assad...
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/13/us-alqaeda-zawahri-idUSBRE88C0KT20120913

Releases New Video of American Hostage...
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/al-qaeda-releases-video-american-hostage/story?id=17221075

Obama, Romney trade tough words over attacks...
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20120913/DA18QEEG1.html

PAPER: President echoes Carter with 'shoot first' criticism...
http://washingtonexaminer.com/obama-echoes-carter-with-shoot-first-criticism-of-romney/article/2507863#.UFHOyo1lQ19

FLASHBACK '08: Obama Politicized Death of 9 Troops To Ding Bush, McCain...
http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/barack-obama-used-troop-deaths-to-ding-bush-mccai


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on September 13, 2012, 08:28:20 am
Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are Now Attacking Our Embassies

Many of us tried to warn Barack Obama that using militants from al-Qaeda and other terrorist organizations to overthrow governments in the Middle East would not end well.  The Obama administration has been so determined to get rid of some of these dictators in the Middle East that they have not even really stopped to think about who would be replacing them.  Our leaders assured us that those opposed to Mubarak and Gaddafi were "freedom fighters" that just wanted "liberty" and "democracy" in those countries.  Well, of course it turns out that the folks that took control of both Egypt and Libya bear no resemblance to George Washington whatsoever.  They have simply replaced one form of tyranny with an even worse form of tyranny.  Sadly, the last couple of days have been a huge wake up call for all of us.  Radical Islamic militants stormed the U.S. embassy in Cairo, Egypt and replaced the American flag with the al-Qaeda flag.  In Benghazi, Libya the U.S. consulate was attacked by a crowd equipped with guns, homemade bombs and rocket-propelled grenades.  They torched the consulate, looted it, and killed the U.S. ambassador and three other U.S. officials.  Apparently they are not as grateful for our help in "liberating" their homelands as the Obama administration thought they would be.  Unfortunately, our politicians fundamentally misunderstand what is going on in the Middle East, and this is going to continue to lead to more policy errors.

For years, our politicians told us that "al-Qaeda" was the big enemy in the "War on Terror".

But then during the "Arab Spring" the U.S. government was openly working with "al-Qaeda" and a bunch of other similar organizations all over the Middle East to overthrow established governments.

To say that our approach to the Middle East has been "inconsistent" would be a massive understatement.

After the protesters stormed the U.S. embassy in Cairo, they made it very clear who they are aligned with.  They tore down the U.S. flag and desecrated it, and they put up a black Islamic flag in its place.

So what did the black flag have on it?  The following is how CNN described the flag....

    The black flag, which hangs atop a ladder inside the compound, is adorned with white characters that read, "There is no God but Allah and Mohammad is his messenger," an emblem often used in al Qaeda propaganda.

This is very reminiscent of what happened in Libya in the days after the toppling of Gaddafi.  At the time, the Daily Mail and other international media organizations posted pictures of the black al-Qaeda flag flying high and proud over the courthouse in Benghazi....

    The black flag of Al Qaeda was hoisted in Libya yesterday as Nato formally ended its military campaign.

    The standard fluttered from the roof of the courthouse in Benghazi, where the country’s new rulers have imposed sharia law since seizing power.

Today, the new government in Egypt is completely dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood.  They hold 47 percent of the seats in parliament and the new president of Egypt belongs to the organization.

So how are they responding to this incident?

Well, they have issued a half-hearted condemnation of the attacks in English, and they have also announced that new protests against the anti-Islam film that originally sparked the violence will be held in Tahrir Square on Friday.

I'm sure that a new round of mass protests will definitely calm everyone down.

Or not.

Hopefully the U.S. embassy in Egypt will have significantly strengthened security by Friday.

In Libya, the U.S. consulate has been essentially destroyed.

You can see pictures of what the U.S. consulate in Benghazi looks like after the attack right here.

Looters took off with whatever they were able to carry.  Reporters saw some people carrying desks, chairs and even washing machines away from the consulate.

The U.S. ambassador, Chris Stevens, was killed along with three other U.S. officials.

You can see a photo of an unconscious Stevens being carried through the streets after the attack right here.

So who was responsible for the attack?

Once again, it appears to have been Islamic radicals associated with al-Qaeda.  The following is from a Reuters article about this incident....

    The attack was believed to have been carried out by Ansar al-Sharia, an al Qaeda-style Sunni Islamist group that has been active in Benghazi, a Libyan security official said. Witnesses said the mob also included tribesmen, militia and other gunmen.

    Ansar al-Sharia cars arrived at the start of the protest but left once fighting started, Hamam said. "The protesters were running around the compound just looking for Americans, they just wanted to find an American so they could catch one."

Most Americans thought that it was a good idea for the Obama administration to back "the rebels" that were fighting to overthrow Gaddafi, but perhaps more people should have been asking what those "rebels" actually stand for.

The following is what former CIA officer Bruce Riedel once said about the composition of the fighters that were attempting to overthrow Gaddafi....

    "There is no question that al-Qaida’s Libyan franchise, Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, is a part of the opposition. It has always been Gadhafi’s biggest enemy and its stronghold is Benghazi. What is unclear is how much of the opposition is al-Qaida/Libyan Islamic Fighting Group – 2 percent or 80 percent."

The leader of the Libyan rebel forces even admitted that some of the very same militants that were shooting at U.S. troops in Iraq were among those that were seeking to "liberate" Libya.  The following is from a 2011 article in the Telegraph....

    Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the Libyan rebel leader, has said jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq are on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Gaddafi's regime.

You can find much more on the link between al-Qaeda and the rebel forces in Libya right here.

So we were shooting at them in Iraq but we supplied them with weapons and gave them air support in Libya?

What kind of nonsense is that?

The truth is that the U.S. government has absolutely no idea what it is doing in the Middle East.

And it looks like more trouble is ahead.

There were other anti-U.S. protests in Sudan, the Gaza Strip and Tunisia on Wednesday.

Sadly, even the top officials in our own government fail to grasp why these militants hate us.  In response to the torching of the consulate in Benghazi, Hillary Clinton asked the following question....

    "Today, many Americans are asking, indeed I ask myself ... How could this happen in a country we helped liberate in a city we helped save from destruction?"

And of course foreign policy has never been a point of emphasis for Barack Obama.

In fact, it has been reported that he skips more than half of his daily intelligence meetings.

So the blind are leading the blind and we continue to make mistake after mistake in the Middle East.

When will we ever learn?

http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/thanks-obama-the-terrorists-you-used-to-topple-regimes-in-egypt-and-libya-are-now-attacking-our-embassies


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on September 13, 2012, 08:37:03 am
UK: Murder of Ambassador to Libya Is a Wake-Up Call for Obama

The murder of the US ambassador and three consulate staff in the Libyan city of Benghazi should act as an urgent wake-up call to President Barack Obama to address America's security concerns properly, rather than trying to avoid them all the time. Ever since Mr Obama entered the White House he has tried to position himself as a politician who has no interest in getting involved in overseas conflicts. Having withdrawn American forces from Iraq and ordered the withdrawal of troops from Afghani- stan, he has tried to appease his...
MORE http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/concoughlin/100180611/murder-of-us-ambassador-is-a-wake-up-call-for-obama/

Commentary Mag:  Muslims Attack, Obama Apologizes

Is it possible to learn from history? Apparently not if you are an American president determined to win the love of the Islamic world. Over 33 years ago, Islamist rioters stormed an American embassy. U.S. sovereignty was violated and hostages were taken. The immediate response from America, though, was conciliatory–as if those who had insulted the United States could be convinced to think better of their target if those who had just been attacked made enough apologies. The result was the Iran hostage crisis that helped bring down the administration of Jimmy Carter. You might think Americans would have learned from Carter’s Iran debacle but...   MORE
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/09/11/sound-familiar-islamists-storm-u-s-embassy-and-america-apologizes-obama-carter/

Report Claims Libyan Security Led Mob To Ambassador

According to a CBS News report updated at 8:39 am Eastern time Wednesday, the Libyan security forces hired to protect the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya moved Ambassador Chris Stevens to a second building within the consulate, then told the militant crowds where he was...
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/12/CBS-Reports-Libyan-Security-Forces-Showed-Militants-Where-to-Attack-Our-Ambassador

Anti-Islam Filmmaker in Hiding After Riots

Speaking by phone from an undisclosed location, writer and director Sam Bacile remained defiant, saying Islam is a cancer and that the 56-year-old intended his film to be a provocative political statement condemning the religion.
http://www.newsday.com/entertainment/movies/anti-islam-filmmaker-in-hiding-after-protests-1.3994211

Anti-Islam Video Linked to Libya, Egypt Attacks to Further Marginalize Christians?

Human rights watchdog Open Doors USA has warned that the attacks that have taken place in the last 24-48 hours in Libya and Egypt as a result of an anti-Islamic film promoted by a Florida minister will lead to further marginalization of Christians in the Middle East and Northern Africa.
http://www.christianpost.com/news/anti-islam-video-linked-to-libya-and-egypt-attacks-to-further-marginalize-christians-81533/


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: tennis shoe on September 13, 2012, 10:53:10 am
Quote
Most Americans thought that it was a good idea for the Obama administration to back "the rebels" that were fighting to overthrow Gaddafi…

Most Americans have nothing to do with this.

Most Americans cannot locate Libya on a world map.

Most Americans still have no idea that the POTUS launched 20+ cruise missiles into that country unprovoked, and for no reason whatsoever a little over a year ago. Even congress didn’t know about it until after the fact.

At least twenty-nine million dollars to blow things up for no reason is no big deal. Forty-six million US citizens on food stamps is no big deal either.

Quote
The truth is that the U.S. government has absolutely no idea what it is doing in the Middle East.

Aah, the “incompetence” argument. The truth is that the U.S. government knows exactly what it is doing. This isn’t the first time that the U.S. government has toppled a stable regime to replace it with a radical one.

The truth is that the U.S. government has not been able to convict anyone of terrorism for the past 11 years. They wanted their own ambassador killed. They want more attacks to happen to justify their bloated, useless security complex.


Title: Sen. John McCain praises ambassador killed in Libya, refuses to criticize Obama
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 13, 2012, 11:57:30 am
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/power-players-abc-news/sen-john-mccain-praises-ambassador-killed-libya-refuses-111254340.html

As for the Obama administration's handling of the crisis, McCain was almost entirely positive. "I think it was fine. By the way, Secretary of State Hilary Clinton gave a marvelous statement today," said McCain. He did not offer such praise for the Romney campaign's statements on the events.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on September 13, 2012, 08:56:22 pm

Exclusive: America 'was warned of embassy attack but did nothing'...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/revealed-inside-story-of-us-envoys-assassination-8135797.html

State Dept 'had credible information 48 hours before'...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/revealed-inside-story-of-us-envoys-assassination-8135797.html

Revealed: Inside story of ambassador's assassination...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/revealed-inside-story-of-us-envoys-assassination-8135797.html

Sensitive documents go missing...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/revealed-inside-story-of-us-envoys-assassination-8135797.html

Exposed: Names of Libyans who are working with Americans...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/revealed-inside-story-of-us-envoys-assassination-8135797.html

Was 'revenge for drone strike'...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/revealed-inside-story-of-us-envoys-assassination-8135797.html

'There were 400 attackers'...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/13/libya-us-consulate-benghazi-damage

OBAMA ADMINSITRATION DENIES...
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/81198.html

PAPER: Egypt intelligence warned on Sept. 4 of possible attacks...
http://www.jpost.com/Headlines/Article.aspx?id=284684

PAPER: U.S. WARNED OF EMBASSY ATTACK BUT DID NOTHING
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/revealed-inside-story-of-us-envoys-assassination-8135797.html


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on September 13, 2012, 08:59:04 pm
CARTER CORRECTS OBAMA...
http://nation.foxnews.com/jimmy-carter/2012/09/13/jimmy-carter-corrects-obama

More protests break out in Muslim world...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/us-embassy-in-yemen-stormed-other-embassies-still-under-siege/2012/09/13/ad65ce7e-fd9b-11e1-a31e-804fccb658f9_story.html

FEDERAL AUTHORITIES OUT ANTI-MUSLIM FILMMAKER...
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/09/13/us-identifies-anti-muslim-filmmaker/

Anti-American protests spread to Iran...
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/world_now/2012/09/iranians-protest-muhammad-film.html

AP: 'Not immediately clear' if he's being investigated...
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/story/2012/09/13/us-identifies-anti-muslim-filmmaker/57777522/1

FBI Warns of Violence in America...
http://abcnews.go.com/International/fbi-warns-violence-america-anti-islamic-movie/story?id=17223571#.UFI6-KDsaso

REPORT: Marines not permitted live ammo at embassy in Egypt..
http://freebeacon.com/reports-marines-not-permitted-live-ammo/


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 13, 2012, 09:04:52 pm
Quote
Exclusive: America 'was warned of embassy attack but did nothing'...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/revealed-inside-story-of-us-envoys-assassination-8135797.html

State Dept 'had credible information 48 hours before'...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/revealed-inside-story-of-us-envoys-assassination-8135797.html

Now where have we heard "But we were warned ahead of time..." before?


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on September 13, 2012, 09:17:42 pm
Now where have we heard "But we were warned ahead of time..." before?

ya, im sure the media will help cover this up also.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 14, 2012, 11:27:01 am
http://news.yahoo.com/protests-against-film-spread-mideast-1-killed-135739393.html

9/14/12

Protests against film spread in Mideast; 1 killed

CAIRO (AP) — Angry demonstrations against an anti-Islam film spread to their widest extent yet around the Middle East and other Muslim countries Friday. Protesters smashed into the German Embassy in the Sudanese capital and set part of it on fire and climbed the walls of the U.S. Embassy in Tunis, waving an Islamist banner.

One protester was killed in the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli in clashes with security forces, after a crowd of protesters set fire to a KFC and an Arby's restaurant. Protesters hurled stones and glass at police in a furious melee that left 25 people wounded, 18 of them police.

Protests were held in cities from Tunisia to Pakistan after weekly Friday Muslim prayers, where many clerics in their mosque sermons called on congregations to defend their faith, denouncing obscure movie produced in the United States that denigrated the Prophet Muhammad.

The numbers were not huge — in most places, only a few hundred took to the streets, mostly ultraconservative Islamists — but the mood was often furious. The spread of protests comes after attacks earlier this week on the U.S. Embassies in Cairo and the Yemeni capital Sanaa and on a U.S. consulate in Libya, where the ambassador and three other Americans were killed.

more


Title: Mob Gathers Outside U.S. Embassy in London
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 14, 2012, 05:45:06 pm
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/mob-gathers-us-embassy-london_652335.html



Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 14, 2012, 05:52:36 pm
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-notifies-congress-troops-sent-libya-yemen-182602336--election.html

9/14/12

Obama notifies Congress of troops sent to Libya, Yemen


President Barack Obama formally informed Congress on Friday that he had sent Marine units to Libya and Yemen on an open-ended mission in the aftermath of attacks on American diplomatic missions there. He cited the bloody assault that claimed the lives of U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three aides at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi.
 
"Although these security forces are equipped for combat, these movements have been undertaken solely for the purpose of protecting American citizens and property," Obama said in a letter to Republican House Speaker John Boehner.
 
"These security forces will remain in Libya and in Yemen until the security situation becomes such that they are no longer needed," the president wrote.
 
"These actions have been directed consistent with my responsibility to protect U.S. citizens both at home and abroad, and in furtherance of U.S. national security and foreign policy interests, pursuant to my constitutional authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and as Commander in Chief and Chief Executive," he continued. "I appreciate the support of the Congress in these actions."Obama wrote the letter in compliance with the 1973 War Powers Act that sought to curtail a president's ability to make war overseas without congressional consent. But he earlier had ignored congressional calls to get formal congressional authorization under that law for U.S. military involvement in the NATO-led campaign to oust Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi, saying it was not required because Americans were not in danger, nor were they leading the mission.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 14, 2012, 10:53:10 pm
Apparently, the filmmaker behind this anti-Muslim film is not only a Coptic Christian, but an ex-felon from So. California.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/anti-muslim-filmmakers-identity-revealed/article4541471/

No, I am NOT defending Islam here. However, this is just me...it seems like this is yet another attempt by the NWO to play both sides of the Hegelian Dialectic in order to provoke an uprising, like we're seeing here.

This denomination doesn't seem to be hardly Christian. They claim the church was founded by Apostle Mark. REALLY?? Where is THIS in scripture?? ???

http://www.gotquestions.org/Coptic-Christianity.html

Quote
Today, there is a small population of Coptic Christians remaining in Alexandria, but most are located elsewhere. Estimates of the current population of the Coptic Church range from 10 million to 60 million members worldwide. Theologically, Coptic Christianity is very similar to Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy. They profess to be genuine followers of Jesus Christ and a part of His worldwide Church. But, as with Catholicism, they tend to emphasize meritorious works in salvation along with liturgical ritual rather than salvation through a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 14, 2012, 11:08:09 pm
http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/18840 (http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/18840)

(http://www.clevelandleader.com/files/islamflag.jpeg)

Black Flag of Islam Flies Over American Embassy in Tunisia as Attacks on America Continue Around the Globe
By Leader Staff. Published on 09/14/2012 - 12:38pm
A black Islamic flag is currently flying over the U.S. embassy in Tunisia after it had been stormed by an angry mob of protesters, who were upset over an anti-Islam film that was made by Americans.

This is just one of many incidents occurring around the world today, in which Americans are being targeted.

In Tunis, the mob overran the compound, scaling walls and setting fire to trees before tearing down the American flag and replacing it with a symbol of Islam. It is not thought that any U.S. staff were actually in the embassy in Tunis. An American school in Tunis was also set on fire. Police responded to the mobs by firing tear gas, and police gunfire could also be heard.

Several dozen protesters were also briefly able to enter the embassy compound and set fire to cars in the embassy parking lot. Police and special forces pushed them back outside.

In Lebanon today angry protesters ransacked a KFC and Hardee's restaurant, police were firing on protesters in Yemen, and there was also unrest in Iraq, Syria, Pakistan and Turkey. Additional unrest occurred in Sudan where an angry mob attacked British and German embassies. In Bangladesh tens of thousands took to the streets to protest, and in India there are widespread protests in Muslim Kashmir. In London, protesters burned an American flag outside of the U.S. embassy.


Title: Arrests made after police officers injured at anti-Islamic film protest in Sydne
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 15, 2012, 09:06:30 am
Arrests made after police officers injured at anti-Islamic film protest in Sydney CBD

9/15/12

http://www.news.com.au/national/police-use-pepper-spray-on-anti-islamic-film-protesters-in-sydney-at-the-us-consulate/story-fndo4bst-1226474744811

PRIME Minister Julia Gillard has condemned a violent demonstration over an anti-Islam film in Sydney's CBD.
Eight people were arrested at the demonstration, the latest in a spate of protests at US embassies and consulates in the Middle East, Africa, Britain and elsewhere over a film that ridicules Prophet Mohammed.

Ms Gillard said violent protest was unacceptable.

"Violent protest is never acceptable - not today, not ever," she said in a statement on Saturday,
NSW Premier Barry O'Farrell condemned the violent protests and promised that those responsible would be punished.

"This is completely unacceptable behaviour," Mr O'Farrell told AAP.

"Those responsible should expect to face full legal consequences for their irresponsible and unwarranted actions."

more


Title: U.S. orders embassy staff to leave Tunis, Khartoum
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 15, 2012, 10:55:06 pm
http://news.yahoo.com/u-orders-family-non-essential-staff-leave-tunis-211016280.html

9/15/12

WASHINGTON/KHARTOUM (Reuters) - The United States ordered non-essential staff to leave its embassies in Tunisia and Sudan on Saturday after both diplomatic posts were attacked and Khartoum rejected a U.S. request to send a platoon of Marines to bolster security at its mission there.
 
"Given the security situation in Tunis and Khartoum, the U.S. State Department has ordered the departure of all family members and non-emergency personnel from both posts, and issued parallel travel warnings to American citizens," State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said in a statement.
 
The U.S. embassies in Tunis and Khartoum were attacked on Friday by protesters infuriated by a widely disseminated anti-Islamic film, made in the United States, that insults the Prophet Mohammad and has provoked a violent reaction across the Muslim world.
 
Four people were killed and 46 injured in the assault on the U.S. Embassy in Tunis, according to a hospital official in the city.
 
In Khartoum, around 5,000 people protesting against the film stormed the German embassy before breaking into the U.S. mission on Friday. They also attacked the British embassy and at least two people were killed in clashes with police, according to state media.
 
A U.S. official told Reuters on Friday that Washington would send Marines to Sudan to improve security at the embassy, which is located outside Khartoum for security reasons.
 
But Sudanese Foreign Minister Ali Ahmed Karti told the state news agency SUNA, "Sudan is able to protect the diplomatic missions in Khartoum and the state is committed to protecting its guests in the diplomatic corps."
 
The top security body in the Khartoum region said that "the surveillance and protection of embassy, mission and foreign residential buildings has been stepped up to prevent any dangers," said the state-linked Sudanese Media Center.
 
Sudanese and U.S. officials said on Saturday that the Marines had already set off for Khartoum but had been called back pending further discussions with Sudan.
 
The United States had "requested additional security precautions as a result of yesterday's damage to our embassy," said Nuland, the State Department spokeswoman. "We are continuing to monitor the situation closely to ensure we have what we need to protect our people and facility."
 
A riot police truck was parked in front of the deserted German embassy, which protesters had set on fire. But an Islamic flag raised by the crowd was still flying.
 
More than 20 police officers were sitting in front of the U.S. embassy.
 
Sudan has also criticized Germany for allowing a protest last month by right-wing activists carrying caricatures of Mohammad, and for Chancellor Angela Merkel's award in 2010 to a Danish cartoonist who had depicted the prophet, triggering unrest across the Islamic world.
 
President Omar Hassan al-Bashir has been under pressure from Islamists who feel the government has given up the religious values of his 1989 Islamist coup.
 
The Sudanese government had called for protests against the film, but peaceful ones. U.S. President Barack Obama's administration said it had nothing to do with the movie, which is little more than an amateurish video clip and appears to have been made in California.
 
(Reporting by Ulf Laessing and Arshad Mohammed; Editing by Christopher Wilson and Kevin Liffey)


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 15, 2012, 10:58:30 pm
US EMBASSY in PARIS
September 15, 2012  Saturday
  Police in Paris detained around 100 people Saturday for taking part in a riot near the U.S. embassy.
France has the largest Muslim community in Europe.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/09/violent-muslim-protests-at-us-embassy-in-paris-100-arrested.html


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on September 28, 2012, 07:24:11 am
US Officials Knew Libya Attack Was Terrorism Within 24 Hours

 Sources confirm to Fox News that the Obama administration knew from day one that the Sept. 11 attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans was an act of terror.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/27/lawmakers-uspicious-administration-trying-to-hide-libya-attack-details/

Panetta: Terrorists behind attack in Libya...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/panetta-says-undetermined-terrorist-group-carried-out-attack-on-us-consulate-in-libya/2012/09/27/8d5b500e-08e0-11e2-9eea-333857f6a7bd_print.html

Administration Officials Were Concerned About Blaming Video...
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/09/some-administration-officials-were-concerned-about-initial-white-house-push-blaming-benghazi-attack-on-mob-video/


REPORT: Anti-Muslim Filmmaker Arrested By Feds...
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/feds-arrest-nakoula-578341

 :o  :o  :o  :o Obama has had an American citizen arrested for FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!!!!

'**** CHRIST' RETURNS TO NEW YORK; NO RIOTS...

http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2012/09/27/****-christ-returns-to-new-york-along-with-****-moses/



Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 28, 2012, 07:44:13 am

'**** CHRIST' RETURNS TO NEW YORK; NO RIOTS...

http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2012/09/27/****-christ-returns-to-new-york-along-with-****-moses/



What is this particular story about? ???


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on September 28, 2012, 07:52:12 am
What is this particular story about? ???

I forgot to fix it, sorry about that

'p1ss CHRIST' RETURNS TO NEW YORK; NO RIOTS...
http://tinyurl.com/8szdvkf


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 28, 2012, 07:57:37 am
I forgot to fix it, sorry about that

'p1ss CHRIST' RETURNS TO NEW YORK; NO RIOTS...
http://tinyurl.com/8szdvkf


Thanks!


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on September 29, 2012, 08:12:10 am
U.S. intelligence now says attack 'deliberate and organized'...

The top U.S. intelligence authority issued an unusual public statement on Friday declaring it now believed the September 11 attack on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi, Libya, was a "deliberate and organized terrorist attack."

The statement by the office of Director of National Intelligence James Clapper acknowledged that it represented a change in the U.S. intelligence assessment of how and why the attack happened. During the attack on two U.S. government compounds in the eastern Libyan city, four U.S. personnel, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, were killed.

Shawn Turner, spokesman for Clapper's office, said that in the immediate aftermath of the attack, U.S. agencies came to the view that the Benghazi attack had begun spontaneously after protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo against a short film made in California lampooning the Prophet Mohammad.

Turner said that as U.S. intelligence subsequently learned more about the attack, "we revised our initial assessment to reflect new information indicating that it was a deliberate and organized terrorist attack carried out by extremists."

He said it remained "unclear" if any individual or specific group commanded the attack. U.S. agencies nonetheless believe that some of the militants involved in the attack were "linked to groups affiliated with, or sympathetic to al-Qaida."

In an apparent reference to a series of contradictory statements by some top Obama administration officials, Turner said intelligence agencies' "initial assessment" had been passed on "to Executive Branch officials and members of Congress, who used that information to discuss the attack publicly and provide updates as they became available."

One U.S. official familiar with the background to the shifting intelligence assessments said the process of figuring out from scraps of intelligence who perpetrated an event like the Benghazi attack was "imprecise" and "evolving."

Debate over whether militant groups planned the assault or whether the violence resulted from protests against the film insulting Islam has become U.S. election-year fodder. Republican lawmakers have demanded answers about the incident from the Obama administration.

Within hours of the attacks ending, some government sources in Washington were already acknowledging they might well have been planned and organized in advance, and that members of two militant factions, Ansar al Shariah and al Qaeda's North Africa-based affiliate, known as al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, may have been involved.

But top administration officials later made public statements that contradicted that assessment.

SHIFTING ASSESSMENTS

On September 14, three days after the attacks, President Barack Obama's press secretary, Jay Carney, said the United States had no evidence the Benghazi attack was planned.

Two days later, Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said preliminary information suggested the attacks were not premeditated and were protests against the anti-Muslim film that provoked demonstrations in Egypt.

On September 19, Carney echoed Rice, saying, "Our belief based on the information we had was that it was the video that caused the unrest in Cairo and the video that — and the unrest in Cairo that helped — that precipitated some of the unrest in Benghazi and elsewhere."

A day later, on September 19, Carney was still insisting, "Based on the information that we had at the time and have to this day, we do not have evidence that it was premeditated."

But that same day, one key administration official moved back toward the assessment that the Benghazi assaults had been organized and intentional.

At a congressional hearing, Matthew Olsen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, part of the National Intelligence Director's office, labeled the assaults a "terrorist attack on our embassy" and said the United States was examining information that people involved in the attack had connections to al Qaeda or its North African affiliate.

By the next day, Carney was asserting it was "self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack."

In his statement on Friday, Turner said that while U.S. intelligence agencies now believed the Benghazi attacks were well organized and deliberate, with some involvement of people connected to militant factions, it was not clear if "any group or person exercised overall command and control of the attack, and if extremist group leaders directed their members to participate."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/28/us-usa-libya-intelligence-idUSBRE88R1EG20120928


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on September 29, 2012, 08:14:15 am
Peter King calls for Susan Rice’s resignation

Rep. Peter King called for the resignation Friday of U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice for initially saying that the deadly Sept. 11 assault on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was spontaneous.

“I believe that this was such a failure of foreign policy messag[ing] and leadership, such a misstatement of facts as was known at the time … for her to go on all of those shows and in effect be our spokesman for the world and be misinforming the American people and our allies and countries around the world, to me, somebody has to pay the price for this,” the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee told CNN.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/81808.html#ixzz27re0Nnua


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on September 29, 2012, 08:16:00 am
It's about time for Obama to apologize to the Amerikan people and stop finding scape goats

Extremists from groups linked to al Qaida struck the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, in a “deliberate and organized terrorist attack,” the top U.S. intelligence agency said Friday, as it took responsibility for the Obama administration’s initial claims that the deadly assault grew from a spontaneous protest against an anti-Islam video.

The unusual statement from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence appeared to have two goals: updating the public on the latest findings of the investigation into the assault, and shielding the White House from a political backlash over its original accounts.

“In the immediate aftermath (of the assault), there was information that led us to assess that the attack began spontaneously following protests earlier that day at our embassy in Cairo,” spokesman Sean Turner said in the statement. “We provided that initial assessment to executive branch officials and members of Congress, who used that information to discuss the attack publicly.”

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/09/28/170078/intelligence-office-says-it-got.html#storylink=cpy


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on October 10, 2012, 07:17:06 am

Official account changes: No protest over anti-Islam video...
http://news.yahoo.com/state-dept-reveals-details-benghazi-attack-062900114.html

FLASHBACK: Amb. Rice: 'Hateful video on Internet sparked violence'...
http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/terrorism/261143-state-dept-officials-refute-administration-claims-on-libya-attack

FLASHBACK: Obama: 'A crude and disgusting video sparked outrage'...
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/us-president-speaks-un-about-youtube-video-posted-june

ROMNEY: Not video, 'despite administration's attempts to convince us'...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/before-attack-on-us-mission-in-libya-state-dept-concluded-risk-of-violence-was-high/2012/10/09/16270dce-123c-11e2-a16b-2c110031514a_story.html?hpid=z2

Top Official: 'Inappropriately low' security at post...
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/10/u-s-security-official-in-libya-tells-congressional-investigators-about-inappropriately-low-security-at-benghazi-post/

House oversight committee holds probe today...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/9/state-department-changes-account-benghazi-attack/?page=all#pagebreak

Rep. Issa 'closes in on Clinton'...

http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/terrorism/261137-rep-issa-closes-in-on-clinton

STATE DEPT SPINS NEW TALE ON BENGHAZI ATTACK
http://abcnews.go.com/International/attack-benghazi-consulate-unprecedented-state-department-official/story?id=17438780#.UHVXCRXA9TI


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Boldhunter on October 11, 2012, 11:43:51 pm
Deceitful: More OBAMA Muslim pics & proof

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-518585/Obama-turban-Barack-accuses-Hillary-smear-campaign-circulating-photos-dressed-Muslim.html

 http://www.barrysoetoro.net/

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ra8SJBEzhxc&sns=em


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on October 13, 2012, 06:38:12 am
Ryan Mauro: Obama's Extreme Negligence in Benghazi

The House of Representatives began its hearings on Wednesday regarding the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attack against the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, which killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. The picture painted by sworn testimonies is one of extreme negligence and incompetence on the part of the Obama administration in protecting our fellow citizens in the field. The Obama administration is also under fire for its embarrassing insistence that the tragedy wasn’t a pre-planned terrorist attack until a mound of evidence forced it to reverse course, long after the truth became obvious.     

MORE: http://frontpagemag.com/2012/ryan-mauro/exposed-extreme-negligence-in-benghazi/


Biden Contradicts State Department on Benghazi Security

Vice President Joe Biden claimed that the administration wasn't aware of requests for more security in Libya before the Sept. 11 attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi during Thursday night's debate, contradicting two State Department officials and the former head of diplomatic security in Libya.

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/10/11/biden_contradicts_state_department_on_benghazi_security


Benghazi attack caught on tape; drone also shot video...
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10/12/video-from-benghazi-consulate-shows-organized-attack.html

WHITE HOUSE UPDATE: Obama, Biden never made aware of request for more security...
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/10/12/white_house_obama_and_biden_were_never_aware_of_requests_for_more_benghazi_security

Obama cam blames Libya trouble on Romney-Ryan
http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-campaign-deputy-blames-libya-issue-on-romneyryan/?cat_orig=politics



Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 13, 2012, 11:04:27 am
Let the blame game begin...


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on October 16, 2012, 05:30:36 am
BUCK STOPS WITH ME: HILLARY TAKES BLAME FOR BENGHAZI...
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/15/us/clinton-benghazi/index.html

Hillary Clinton to Obama in 2008: 'The Buck Stops In The Oval Office'...
http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/hillary-clinton-to-obama-in-2008-the-buck-stops


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 16, 2012, 09:49:29 am
BUCK STOPS WITH ME: HILLARY TAKES BLAME FOR BENGHAZI...
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/15/us/clinton-benghazi/index.html

Hillary Clinton to Obama in 2008: 'The Buck Stops In The Oval Office'...
http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/hillary-clinton-to-obama-in-2008-the-buck-stops

 :-\

Did Hillary just give off some kind of subliminal message here? :-X


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on October 24, 2012, 07:08:44 am
White House told of militant claim two hours after Libya attack: emails

Officials at the White House and State Department were advised two hours after attackers assaulted the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11 that an Islamic militant group had claimed credit for the attack, official emails show.

The emails, obtained by Reuters from government sources not connected with U.S. spy agencies or the State Department and who requested anonymity, specifically mention that the Libyan group called Ansar al-Sharia had asserted responsibility for the attacks.

The brief emails also show how U.S. diplomats described the attack, even as it was still under way, to Washington.

U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the Benghazi assault, which President Barack Obama and other U.S. officials ultimately acknowledged was a "terrorist" attack carried out by militants with suspected links to al Qaeda affiliates or sympathizers.

Administration spokesmen, including White House spokesman Jay Carney, citing an unclassified assessment prepared by the CIA, maintained for days that the attacks likely were a spontaneous protest against an anti-Muslim film.

While officials did mention the possible involvement of "extremists," they did not lay blame on any specific militant groups or possible links to al Qaeda or its affiliates until intelligence officials publicly alleged that on September 28.

There were indications that extremists with possible al Qaeda connections were involved, but also evidence that the attacks could have erupted spontaneously, they said, adding that government experts wanted to be cautious about pointing fingers prematurely.

U.S. intelligence officials have emphasized since shortly after the attack that early intelligence reporting about the attack was mixed.

Spokesmen for the White House and State Department had no immediate response to requests for comments on the emails.

MISSIVES FROM LIBYA

The records obtained by Reuters consist of three emails dispatched by the State Department's Operations Center to multiple government offices, including addresses at the White House, Pentagon, intelligence community and FBI, on the afternoon of September 11.

The first email, timed at 4:05 p.m. Washington time - or 10:05 p.m. Benghazi time, 20-30 minutes after the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission allegedly began - carried the subject line "U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack" and the notation "SBU", meaning "Sensitive But Unclassified."

The text said the State Department's regional security office had reported that the diplomatic mission in Benghazi was "under attack. Embassy in Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well."

The message continued: "Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four ... personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia is providing security support."

A second email, headed "Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi" and timed 4:54 p.m. Washington time, said that the Embassy in Tripoli had reported that "the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi had stopped and the compound had been cleared." It said a "response team" was at the site attempting to locate missing personnel.

A third email, also marked SBU and sent at 6:07 p.m. Washington time, carried the subject line: "Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack."

The message reported: "Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli."

While some information identifying recipients of this message was redacted from copies of the messages obtained by Reuters, a government source said that one of the addresses to which the message was sent was the White House Situation Room, the president's secure command post.

Other addressees included intelligence and military units as well as one used by the FBI command center, the source said.

It was not known what other messages were received by agencies in Washington from Libya that day about who might have been behind the attacks.

Intelligence experts caution that initial reports from the scene of any attack or disaster are often inaccurate.

By the morning of September 12, the day after the Benghazi attack, Reuters reported that there were indications that members of both Ansar al-Sharia, a militia based in the Benghazi area, and al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the North African affiliate of al Qaeda's faltering central command, may have been involved in organizing the attacks.

One U.S. intelligence official said that during the first classified briefing about Benghazi given to members of Congress, officials "carefully laid out the full range of sparsely available information, relying on the best analysis available at the time."

The official added, however, that the initial analysis of the attack that was presented to legislators was mixed.

"Briefers said extremists were involved in attacks that appeared spontaneous, there may have been a variety of motivating factors, and possible links to groups such as (al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and Ansar al-Sharia) were being looked at closely," the official said.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-benghazi-emails-idUSBRE89N02C20121024


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Christian40 on October 25, 2012, 12:36:32 am
Obama caught arming Al-Qaeda

Excerpted from The Washington Times, piece by Frank Gaffney, Reagans’ assistant Secretary of State: President Obama’s once seemingly unstoppable march toward re-election hit what he might call “bumps in the road” in Benghazi, Libya, late on Sept. 11, 2012. It might be more accurate to describe the effect of the well-planned and -executed, military-style attack on a diplomatic facility there as the political equivalent of a devastating improvised explosive device on the myth of the unassailability of the Obama record as commander in chief.

Thanks to intrepid investigative reporting — notably by Bret Baier and Catherine Herridge at Fox News, Aaron Klein at WND.com and Clare Lopez at RadicalIslam.org — and information developed by congressional investigators, the mystery is beginning to unravel with regard to what happened that night and the reason for the subsequent, clumsy official cover-up now known as Benghazigate.

The evidence suggests that the Obama administration has not simply been engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East. Starting in March 2011, when American diplomat J. Christopher Stevens was designated the liaison to the “opposition” in Libya, the Obama administration has been arming them, including jihadists like Abdelhakim Belhadj, leader of the al Qaeda franchise known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.

Once Moammar Gadhafi was overthrown, Stevens was appointed ambassador to the new Libya run by Mr. Belhadj and his friends. Not surprisingly, one of the most important priorities for someone in that position would be to try to find and secure the immense amount of armaments that had been cached by the dictator around the country and systematically looted during and after the revolution.

One of the places in Libya most awash with such weapons in the most dangerous of hands is Benghazi. It now appears that Stevens was there — on a particularly risky day, with no security to speak of and despite now copiously documented concerns about his own safety and that of his subordinates — for another priority mission: sending arms recovered from the former regime’s stocks to the “opposition” in Syria. As in Libya, the insurgents are known to include al Qaeda and other Shariah-supremacist groups, including none other than Abdelhakim Belhadj.

Fox News has chronicled how the Al Entisar, a Libyan-flagged vessel carrying 400 tons of cargo, docked on Sept. 6 in the Turkish port of Iskenderun. It reportedly supplied both humanitarian assistance and arms — including deadly SA-7 man-portable surface-to-air missiles — apparently destined for Islamists, again including al Qaeda elements, in Syria.

What cries out for further investigation — and debate in the remaining days of this presidential election — is whether this shipment was part of a larger covert Obama effort to transfer weapons to our enemies that could make the Iran-Contra scandal, to say nothing of Operation Fast and Furious, pale by comparison.

Investigative journalist Aaron Klein has reported that the “consulate in Benghazi” actually was no such thing. He observes that although administration officials have done nothing to correct that oft-repeated characterization of the facility where the murderous attack on Stevens and his colleagues was launched, they call it a “mission.” What Mr. Klein describes as a “shabby, nondescript building” that lacked any “major public security presence” was, according to an unnamed Middle Eastern security official, “routinely used by Stevens and others to coordinate with the Turkish, Saudi and Qatari governments on supporting the insurgencies in the Middle East, most prominently the rebels opposing Assad’s regime in Syria.”

We know that Stevens‘ last official act was to hold such a meeting with an unidentified “Turkish diplomat.” Presumably, the conversation involved additional arms shipments to al Qaeda and its allies in Syria. It also may have involved getting more jihadi fighters there. After all, Mr. Klein reported last month that, according to sources in Egyptian security, our ambassador was playing a “central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria.”

It gets worse. Last week, Center for Security Policy senior fellow and former career CIA officer Clare Lopez observed that there were two large warehouse-type buildings associated with the so-called “consulate” whose purpose has yet to be disclosed. As their contents were raided in the course of the attack, we may never know for sure whether they housed — and were known by the local jihadis to house — arms, perhaps administered by the two former Navy SEALs killed along with Stevens.

What we do know is that the New York Times — one of the most slavishly pro-Obama publications in the country — reported in an Oct. 14 article, “Most of the arms shipped at the behest of Saudi Arabia and Qatar to supply Syrian rebel groups fighting the government of Bashar Assad are going to hard-line Islamic jihadists, and not the more secular opposition groups that the West wants to bolster.”

In short, it seems President Obama has been engaged in gun-walking on a massive scale. The effect has been to equip America’s enemies to wage jihad not only against regimes it once claimed were our friends, but inevitably against us and our allies as well. That would explain his administration’s desperate and now failing bid to mislead the voters through the serial deflections of Benghazigate.

http://patdollard.com/2012/10/breaking-obama-caught-arming-al-qaeda/


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on October 27, 2012, 03:53:39 am
Obama refuses to answer repeated questions on Benghazi
'Whether the president knew of the cries for help during the terrorist attack'


President Barack Obama reportedly refused to provide a direct answer to repeated questions on whether requests for help in Benghazi were denied as the attack was underway during an interview with 9News in Denver on Friday.

Kyle Clark, a reporter with 9News, asked the president about the requests for help and whether or not it was fair to make Americans wait for answers on Benghazi until after the election.

“The election has nothing to do with four brave Americans getting killed and us wanting to find out exactly what happened,” Obama said. “Nobody wants to find out more what happened than I do.”

The president went on to say he wants to “gather all the facts” and find out “exactly what happened” and bring justice to the terrorists who attacked the U.S. mission in Libya.

Read the full story ›
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/reporter-obama-would-not-answer-repeated-questions-on-whether-requests-for-help-in-benghazi-were-denied/


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on October 27, 2012, 03:55:08 am
Clinton asked for more security, Obama said no
'In real time, watching it happen, and they didn't do anything about it'


Last night, it was revealed that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had ordered more security at the U.S. mission in Benghazi before it was attacked where four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens were murdered by Al-Qaeda but President Obama denied the request.

The news broke on TheBlazeTV’s “Wilkow!” hosted by Andrew Wilkow, by best-selling author, Ed Klein who said the legal counsel to Clinton had informed him of this information.

Klein also said that those same sources said that former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife [Hillary] to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.

Read the full story ›
http://www.examiner.com/article/clinton-asked-for-more-security-benghazi-obama-said-no


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on October 27, 2012, 03:56:03 am
Petraeus won't let agency be Benghazi scapegoat
'No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims ... inaccurate'


(Weekly Standard) Breaking news on Benghazi: the CIA spokesman, presumably at the direction of CIA director David Petraeus, has put out this statement: “No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. ”

So who in the government did tell “anybody” not to help those in need? Someone decided not to send in military assets to help those Agency operators. Would the secretary of defense make such a decision on his own? No.

Read the full story ›
http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/petraeus-wont-let-agency-be-benghazi-scapegoat/?cat_orig=us


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on October 27, 2012, 03:57:34 am
Now Reuters contradicts itself on Benghazi attacks
News agency already in hot water for seemingly misleading report


Reuters has yet to explain a possibly false or misleading report quoting a purported protester by his first name who described a supposedly popular demonstration against an anti-Muhammad film outside the U.S. mission in Benghazi.

The widely circulated Reuters article is now apparently contradicted by the news agency’s own new reporting. Two days ago, Reuters broke the story that White House and State Department officials were immediately informed by email that an Islamic terrorist group had claimed credit for the Benghazi attack.

The original Reuters article claiming a popular protest against a Muhammad film is also contradicted by vivid accounts provided by the State Department and intelligence officials describing how no such popular demonstration took place. Instead, video footage from Benghazi reportedly shows an organized group of armed men attacking the compound, the officials said.

The new Reuters report quoting emails to the White House describing an Islamic terror attack also directly contradicts multiple statements by President Obama and White House officials who had claimed there was a civilian protest before the attacks and that the demonstration was an expression of anger over a YouTube video that mocked Muhammad.

The questions about the original Reuters reporting also come as CBS News was accused of holding back a video interview with Obama that indicates the president knew the assault on the U.S. mission in Benghazi was a premeditated terror attack and not motivated by a Muhammad film, as the White House originally claimed.

rest: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/now-reuters-contradicts-itself-on-benghazi-attacks/?cat_orig=us


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on October 27, 2012, 03:59:50 am
Senators demand White House declassify Libya video...
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_US_LIBYA_SURVEILLANCE_VIDEO?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-10-26-20-18-22

CIA OPS 'DENIED HELP' THREE TIMES DURING BENGHAZI...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/26/cia-operators-were-denied-request-for-help-during-benghazi-attack-sources-say/

Father of Slain SEAL: Who Made the Decision Not to Save My Son?
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/father-slain-seal-who-made-decision-not-save-my-son_657782.html

PENTAGON: Knew too little to deploy troops...
http://news.yahoo.com/us-knew-too-little-deploy-troops-benghazi-pentagon-060316307.html

Panetta: Critics 'Monday Morning Quarterbacking'...
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/10/26/panetta-critics-monday-morning-quarterbacking-white-house-handling-of-libya-attack

KRISTOL: Petraeus Throws President Under Bus...
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/petraeus-throws-obama-under-bus_657896.html

OBAMA DODGES DURING LOCAL TV INTERVIEW...
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/10/president-obama-begs-off-answering-whether-americans-in-benghazi-were-denied-requests-for-help/


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 27, 2012, 09:19:39 am
The whole thing was a false flag attack from the get-go - but typical of the NWO-runned media to play both sides of the aisle where both sides point fingers at one another, stirring more debate.

Also, the Romney team pointed out the flaws, coverups, etc ALMOST IMMEDIATELY after the attacks(we're talking like 1-2 hours after, NOT the next couple of days). Which also goes to prove this.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on November 04, 2012, 05:41:36 am
CIA Timeline Confirms: Wood and Doherty Killed in Benghazi 7Hrs After WH Told of Attack; Commercial Airliner Can Fly From London to Libya and Back in That Time

What David Ignatius of The Washington Post describes as a “detailed CIA timeline” of the events that unfolded in Libya on Sept. 11, 2012 (and in the early hours of Sept. 12), confirms that former Navy Seals Tyrone Wood and Brian Doherty were not killed until seven hours after the State Department informed the White House—in writing--that the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi was under attack and that U.S. Amb. Chris Stevens was in Benghazi where the attack was taking place.

The attack started at 3:40 p.m Washington, D.C. time. The State Department sent the White House an email at 4:05 pm with this subject line: “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack.” The email said Amb. Stevens was in Benghazi.

According to the CIA timeline provided to the Washington Post and other news organizations, Wood and Doherty were killed by mortar fire while on the roof of a CIA facility in Benghazi between 11:15 p.m. and 11:26 p.m. Washington time—or between 5:15 a.m. and 5:26 a.m. Sept. 12 Benghazi time.

Between 4:05 p.m. Washington time, when the State Department emailed the White House that the U.S diplomatic mission in Benghazi was under attack, and 11:15 p.m., when Wood and Doherty were killed, more than seven hours passed.

On Expedia.com, British Airways is currently advertizing a non-stop flight from London to Libya on Nov. 15--via an Airbus A320--that is expected to have a duration of 3 hours and 30 minutes. That means that in the seven hours that elapsed between when the State Department informed the White House that the U.S. mission in Benghazi was under and when Wood and Doherty were killed, a common commercial airliner—not a military jet--could have flow from England to Libya and back.

White House National Security Adviser Tom Donilon, according to reporting by CBS News, personally informed President Obama of the ongoing attack in Benghazi before Obama went into a pre-scheduled 5:00 p.m. meeting with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Vice President Joe Biden.

(On Tuesday, CNSNews.com asked the Defense Department whether this previously scheduled meeting between Obama and Panetta had in fact taken place, whether Panetta was aware at that time of the ongoing attack in Benghazi that the State Department had reported to both the Pentagon and the White House at 4:05 p.m., and whether the president had used that meeting to discuss with Panetta what should be done to defend the Americans in Benghazi. Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale, a department spokesman, told CNSNews.com at that time: “Panetta met with President Obama, as the White House-provided scheduled indicates. However, neither the content nor the subject of discussions between the President and his advisers are appropriate for disclosure.”)

CBS reported that after National Security Adviser Donilon initially notified Obama of the Benghazi attack just before the 5:00 p.m. meeting with Panetta the president was subsequently “updated several times throughout the evening.”

The CIA timeline was provided to some news organizations on Thursday to demonstrate that the administration was getting a bum rap from those who said it reacted too slowly to the 9/11/12 terrorist attack in Libya.

According to the timeline, as published by the Associated Press, a security team left the CIA annex in Benghazi to go to the aid of the nearby consulate less than 25 minutes after the attack started at 9:40 p.m Benghazi time (3:40 p.m. Washington time).

This team included former Navy Seal Tyrone Wood, Ignatius reported in the Washington Post. It rescued some people at the consulate, sending them back to the CIA annex.

By 11:30 p.m. this security team itself left the consulate to return--while being attacked--to the CIA annex. In the meantime, as the Los Angeles Times reported of the timeline, another security team came from Tripoli to Benghazi aboard a chartered airplane.

“[T]he CIA also sent a second six-member team from Tripoli on a chartered plane to help repel the attack," reported the Times. "This team included Glen Doherty, another former SEAL, who was later killed when attackers fired mortar rounds at the CIA Annex."

After making the short flight from Tripoli to Benghazi, however, the CIA security team had a very difficult time trying to get from the Benghazi airport to the CIA annex to which their colleagues had retreated when they left the consulate.

The AP story on the timeline says that the CIA security team from Tripoli arrived at the Benghazi airport at 1:00 a.m., but then could not “find a ride into town.

“Around 1 a.m., a team of additional security personnel from Tripoli lands at the Benghazi airport and attempts to find a ride into town. Upon learning that Stevens is missing and that the situation at the CIA annex has calmed, the team focuses on locating Stevens and obtaining information about the security situation at the hospital,” reported the AP.

“Before dawn, the team at the airport finally manages to secure transportation and armed escort,” said the AP.

At 1:00 a.m. Benghazi time, when the AP says these security reinforcements arrived at the Benghazi airport, it was 7:00 p.m. Washington, D.C. time—or about three hours after the White House had first learned of the attack

David Ignatius at the Washington Post reported that the security reinforcements from Tripoli arrived at the Benghazi airport at 1:15 a.m., but did not leave the airport until 4:30 a.m.

"1:15 a.m.: CIA reinforcements arrive on a 45-minute flight from Tripoli in a plane they’ve hastily chartered," Ignatius wrote. "The Tripoli team includes four GRS [Global Response Staff] security officers, a CIA case officer and two U.S. military personnel on loan to the agency. They don’t leave the Benghazi airport until 4:30 a.m. The delay is caused by negotiations with Libyan authorities over permission to leave the airport; obtaining vehicles; and the need to frame a clear mission plan. The first idea is to go to a Benghazi hospital to recover Stevens, who they rightly suspect is already dead. (Also killed was a State Department communication specialist.) But the hospital is surrounded by the al-Qaeda-linked Ansar al-Sharia militia that mounted the consulate attack."

Between when these CIA security reinforcements landed in Benghazi at about 1:00 a.m. or 1:15 a.m. and when they arrived at the CIA annex, about four hours elapsed, according to the reports. That alone is more than the three and a half hours it takes British Airways to fly an Airbus from London to Libya.

“5:15 a.m. The team arrives at the CIA annex, with Libyan support, just before mortar rounds begin to hit the facility,” says the AP report on the timeline. “Two CIA security officers Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty are killed when they take direct mortar fire while engaging the attackers. The attack lasts only 11 minutes before dissipating.” Doherty had come with the security team from Tripoli.

At 5:15 a.m. Benghazi time it was 11:15 p.m Washington time—seven hours and 10 minutes after the State Department sent its email notifying the White House that the U.S. mission in Benghazi was under attack.

In an interview with KUSA TV in Denver a week ago, President Obama said of the Benghazi attack: “[T]he minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to.”

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/cia-timeline-confirms-wood-and-doherty-killed-benghazi-7hrs-after-wh-told-attack


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on November 04, 2012, 05:45:33 am
Just unbelievable!!!  :o

State Dept. Congratulates Libya on Revolution to ‘Enjoy…Peace, Security, and Prosperity’

Following the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi that killed U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other Americans, the U.S. State Department said on Friday that Libya fought a revolution to enjoy a “democratic future with peace, security, and prosperity.”

“The Libyan people fought a difficult revolution in order to enjoy a democratic future with peace, security and prosperity,” read a State Department press release issued on Nov. 2.

 “The United States congratulates the Libyan people on the formation of a government. This is a critical milestone in their democratic transition. We encourage the country’s leaders to build democratic and security institutions and to promote economic development and the rule of law,” the statement continues.

The State Department also said that it looks forward to working “closely” with Libya and is “committed” to supporting the Libyan people during the transition to a new government.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/state-dept-congratulates-libya-revolution-enjoy-peace-security-and-prosperity


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on November 04, 2012, 06:25:50 am
(http://cnsnews.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/cartoon_550/images/Foden20121101-Untold%20Story_0.jpg)


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 13, 2012, 11:13:35 pm
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/11/13/paula-broadwell-driver-license-found-in-dc-park

Paula Broadwell's License Discovered in D.C. Park
Police notify FBI -- Broadwell's attorney mum on her whereabouts

The woman revealed to have been carrying on an affair with former CIA Director David Petraeus lost her driver's license in a Washington, D.C., park recently, sources tell U.S. News.

A Maryland National Capital Park Police spokesman confirmed that a jogger found a North Carolina license in Rock Creek Park belonging to Paula Broadwell. Park Police planned to hold it for 90 days, per policy, and then send it back to the North Carolina Department of Transportation.

The Park Police also alerted the FBI, says Bill Kellogg, a spokesman for the Park Police. The FBI did not initially return calls for comment on the report.

Broadwell's attorney, Robert F. Muse, confirmed that Broadwell, a North Carolina resident, lost her driver's license in the park.

The FBI searched Broadwell's Charlotte, N.C., home Monday for at least four hours. It is unclear if Broadwell was home at the time, though she is not mentioned in any subsequent reporting about the search.

Muse did not immediately return calls regarding Broadwell's current whereabouts.

Broadwell allegedly sent threatening E-mails to Jill Kelley, which sparked a subsequent FBI investigation, and eventually led to Petraeus' resignation from the CIA.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 13, 2012, 11:15:13 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandra_Levy

Chandra Ann Levy (April 14, 1977 – c. May 1, 2001) was an American intern at the Federal Bureau of Prisons in Washington, D.C., who disappeared in May 2001. She was presumed murdered after her skeletal remains were found in Rock Creek Park in May 2002.
The investigation led to media allegations of an affair with married, and then-U.S. Representative, Gary Condit, a five-term Democrat representing California's 18th congressional district and a senior member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.businessinsider.com/paula-broadwell-father-paul-krantz-2012-11

Paula Broadwell's Father: 'This Is About Something Else Entirely, And The Truth Will Come Out'

Paula Broadwell's father Paul Krantz gave the New York Daily News a strange, cryptic quote this afternoon outside his home in Bismarck, N.D.
“This is about something else entirely, and the truth will come out,” he told the Daily News.

There is a lot more that is going to come out ... You wait and see. There’s a lot more here than meets the eye.”

He said that his daughter, who's at the center of the controversy that prompted CIA director David Petraeus to resign from his post, is a victim of character assassination, and that there's something much bigger lurking behind the curtain.

Krantz also said that he supports his daughter "100 percent," and that he can't elaborate any further.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on December 19, 2012, 11:32:04 am
THE BUCK STOPS ... NOWHERE...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/dec/18/review-board-slams-state-benghazi-security-failure/

Benghazi review finds systemic State Dept failures...
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_US_LIBYA_ATTACKS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-12-18-21-20-30

No individual shirked duties, no disciplinary action....
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_US_LIBYA_ATTACKS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-12-18-21-20-30

Report blames Libyan guards hired to protect compound...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/benghazi-panel-presents-findings-to-lawmakers-makes-recommendations/2012/12/18/9ada6032-495c-11e2-b6f0-e851e741d196_story.html

Were on Strike in 'Protest Over Salary, Working Hours'...
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/libyan-militia-hired-protect-us-benghazi-mission-was-strike-sept-11-protest-over-salary

No mention of anti-Islam film on social media day of attack...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12/18/no-reference-to-anti-islam-film-on-social-media-in-libya-day-attack-analysis/

STATE DEPT SECURITY CHIEF RESIGNS...
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_US_LIBYA_ATTACKS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-12-19-12-01-41


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on December 20, 2012, 07:06:49 am
Report Confirms: ‘No Protest Prior’ to Benghazi Attack
December 20, 2012


The special Accountability Review Board set up by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to investigate the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, confirmed that there was nothing “unusual” taking place outside the mission in the hours before the attack, that there was no protest, and that the attack started suddenly when security cameras detected dozens of men, many of them armed, swarming through one of the gates of the compound.

The board’s report, released Tuesday, also says that the U.S. mission in Benghazi was in communication with Washington, D.C., as the attack was unfolding.

Despite the fact that the eyewitnesses interviewed by the Accountability Review Board said there was no protest, and the scene was caught by security cameras, and the mission was in communication with Washington almost instantly, U.S. government officials, including then-CIA Director David Petraeus and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice would state days later that there had been a protest.

The report does not explain how senior administration officials later decided there had been a protest when the eyewitness testimony and video surveillance did not say that.

Full article here
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/report-confirms-no-protest-prior-benghazi-attack-security-cameras-detected-many-armed


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on February 02, 2013, 05:57:48 am
(http://l3.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/gAPs6JdNRpIXEalt.pIWmA--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9aW5zZXQ7aD0zMDA7cT04NTt3PTQwMA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en-US/video/video.associatedpressfree.com/a6f03159011d2b96c6622dd421fe99d4)

SUICIDE BOMBING AT U.S. EMBASSY...
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_TURKEY_US_EXPLOSION?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-02-01-07-18-16

Eighth Embassy Attack During Clinton Reign...
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/02/us-embassy-bombing-in-turkey-was-eighth-embassy-attack-during-secretary-of-state-clintons-reign/

HILLARY: 'I've done what was possible to do'...
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CLINTON_SYRIA?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-01-31-18-35-42

'Some people refused to accept the facts'...
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20130201/DA45R6S01.html

Says Benghazi massacre, murdered ambassador won't affect run for presidency...
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/02/01/clinton-benghazi-wont-affect-whether-i-run-for-president/


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on February 02, 2013, 07:03:33 am
US embassy bomber spent five years in jail on terror charges
The Independent  - ‎31 minutes ago‎     
 
The man who blew himself up outside America's embassy in Ankara yesterday, killing himself and a Turkish security guard, spent five years in prison on terrorism charges, officials revealed today.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/us-embassy-bomber-spent-five-years-in-jail-on-terror-charges-8478184.html

US embassy bombing in Turkey called 'act of terror' by Obama administration
The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/01/us-embassy-turkey-terror-obama

Really? Sure we cant blame this on that nut in Florida? Terrorism is just so not an Obma answer

Highly Cited:Suicide bomber kills guard at US Embassy in TurkeyNTV
http://www.nebraska.tv/story/20931853/report-several-injured-in-blast-near-us-embassy

From Turkey:U.S. embassy flag at half mastHurriyet Daily News
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/us-embassy-flag-at-half-mast-.aspx?pageID=238&nID=40364&NewsCatID=341

In Depth:Suicide bomber attacks US Embassy in TurkeyLos Angeles Times
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-turkey-embassy-bombing-20130202,0,7266474.story


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on February 07, 2013, 12:58:01 pm
Panetta: Obama Absent Night of Benghazi...
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/panetta-obama-absent-night-benghazi_700405.html

Hillary AWOL...
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/no-word-hillary-during-benghazi-attack_700410.html

GENERAL: 'We Never Received a Request for Support'...
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/general-benghazi-we-never-received-request-support-state-department_700403.html


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 07, 2013, 02:58:34 pm
Guess noone will ever know the truth...but noone really knows the truth about 9/11, OKC, JFK assassination, etc, so I guess it comes as no surprise.

1John_5:19  And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on May 01, 2013, 01:55:36 pm
Carney: 'Benghazi Happened a Long Time Ago'

White House spokesman Jay Carney said in response to a question about the September 11, 2012 Benghazi terror attack that it "happened a long time ago."

"Let's be clear," said Carney. "Benghazi happened a long time ago. We are unaware of any agency blocking an employee who would like to appear before Congress to provide information related to Benghazi."

The question was about reports that Benghazi whistleblowers are being prevented from coming forward.

video: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/carney-benghazi-happened-long-time-ago_720428.html


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Kilika on May 01, 2013, 05:22:16 pm
Quote
"Let's be clear," said Carney. "Benghazi happened a long time ago. We are unaware of any agency blocking an employee who would like to appear before Congress to provide information related to Benghazi."

Allow me to offer a possible translation...

It's decided. The official party line is that this is a closed topic. We have moved on. Please refer to your script for the current topic. Any questions? Your more than welcome to stick your neck out.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on May 07, 2013, 06:15:40 am
Special ops halted from responding to Benghazi attacks, U.S. diplomat says


As the weakly protected U.S. diplomatic compound in eastern Libya came under attack the night of Sept. 11, 2012, the deputy head of the embassy in Tripoli 600 miles away sought in vain to get the Pentagon to scramble fighter jets over Benghazi in a show of force that he said might have averted a second attack on a nearby CIA complex.

Hours later, according to excerpts of the account by the U.S. diplomat, Gregory Hicks, American officials in the Libyan capital sought permission to deploy four U.S. Special Operations troops to Benghazi aboard a Libyan military aircraft early the next morning. The troops were told to stand down.

Defense Department officials have said they had no units that could have responded in time to counter the attack in Benghazi, but Republicans on Capitol Hill have questioned whether the Obama administration could have saved lives with a nimbler, more assertive response. They say that the reluctance to send the Special Operations troops may have, at the very least, deprived wounded Americans in Benghazi of first aid.

Congressional investigators released a partial transcript of Hicks’s testimony Monday ahead of a hearing Wednesday at which he is scheduled to appear. His remarks are the first public account from a U.S. official who was in Libya at the time of the attacks about the options that were weighed as militants mobbed the American diplomatic outpost and CIA station in Ben­ghazi, killing U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other government employees.

The new details are certain to reignite a debate over whether the Obama administration has been sufficiently forthcoming in its public accounting of the events and missteps that resulted in the first death of a U.S. ambassador in the line of duty in a generation. If Republicans in Congress succeed in portraying the administration’s response as feckless, the episode could dog any future political aspirations of Hillary Rodham Clinton, who was secretary of state when the attacks happened.

After the attacks ended without planes being scrambled or special forces dispatched, the lieutenant colonel in Tripoli who commanded the Special Operations team told Hicks he was sorry that his men had been held back.

“I’ve never been so embarrassed in my life that a State Department officer has bigger balls than someone in the military,” the officer told Hicks, according to the diplomat’s account. Hicks called that “a nice compliment.”

Hicks may have been the last American official to speak with Stevens. After an embassy security official ran into his residence to tell him about the initial attack, Hicks managed to get Stevens on the phone. “Greg, we’re under attack,” Stevens blurted out, according to Hicks. “My response is ‘Okay,’ and I’m about to say something else and the line clicks.”

The administration has said the independent review of the Benghazi assault was exhaustive, and State Department officials have vowed to implement reforms to make U.S. missions abroad safer. Republicans, however, say Hicks’s account suggests the administration has not been entirely truthful.

“The White House and the Pentagon have allowed us to believe that there were no military options on the table,” Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) said in a phone interview. “The model of the military is to leave no person behind, and it’s stunning and unacceptable to think we had military willing and ready to go and the Pentagon told them to stand down. That’s just not the American way.”

Chaffetz said the troops who were not allowed to travel to Benghazi would have arrived after the attack on the CIA base but may have provided first aid to wounded personnel. He noted that the order to keep them from traveling was given before the second attack.

A Pentagon spokesman said he would review the Hicks testimony. “We have repeatedly stated that while Department officials started taking action immediately after learning that an attack was underway at the American facility there, our forces were unable to reach it in time to intervene to stop the attacks,” Pentagon spokesman George Little said in an e-mail Monday night.

State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell told reporters that the Republican-led inquiry appears to be politicized, saying it was “not a collaborative process.”

He said, however, that the State Department is not seeking to suppress the accounts of whistleblowers. “We have always encouraged any State Department employee who wants to share their story and tell the truth,” he said.

Part of the Benghazi debate has focused on whether prompt action might have saved lives. In the initial attack, militants overran the compound where Stevens was staying and he and another State Department officer, Sean Smith, were killed. Others made their way to a nearby annex used by the CIA, where two Americans, former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, died in an attack several hours later.

Hicks, a veteran Foreign Service officer who is scheduled to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Wednesday, told congressional staffers that he and others in Libya thought that flying U.S. military jets over Benghazi during the early hours of the attack could have had a deterrent effect.

“If we had been able to scramble a fighter or aircraft or two over Benghazi as quickly as possible after the attack commenced, I believe there would not have been a mortar attack on the [CIA] annex in the morning, because I believe the Libyans would have split,” Hicks said. “They would have been scared to death that we would have gotten a laser on them and killed them.”

Hicks said that late on the night of Sept. 11 he called the embassy’s defense attache, Lt. Col. Keith Phillips, and asked about the viability of sending jets.

“Is there anything coming?” Hicks said he asked Phillips.

Phillips told Hicks that the nearest planes were at Aviano Air Base in Italy and that it would take two to three hours to get them off the ground, the diplomat told congressional staffers. There also were no aircraft nearby that could have refueled airborne planes.

“The answer was, it’s too far away, there are no tankers, there is nothing, there is nothing that could respond,” he said.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/special-ops-halted-from-responding-to-benghazi-attacks-us-diplomat-says/2013/05/06/c3f311d4-b677-11e2-aa9e-a02b765ff0ea_print.html


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on May 07, 2013, 06:16:48 am
White House tries to deflect criticism from Benghazi whistle-blowers

The White House on Monday attempted to deflect new criticism on the administration’s handling of the Benghazi attacks from a firsthand witness and an additional whistle-blower, arguing that an internal State Department review charged with investigating the September attacks was led by an “unimpeachable” team.
 
When confronted with reports of new complaints by whistle-blowers preparing to testify Wednesday before a House committee looking into the Benghazi attacks, Mr. Carney repeatedly touted the credentials of the two men charged with conducting the State Department's Accountability Review Board and called their investigation “unsparing” and “highly critical.”
 
Retired Ambassador Thomas Pickering and Adm. Michael Mullen, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, led the review, which faulted leadership and management deficiencies in two State Department offices in allowing the U.S. diplomatic post to become vulnerable to the attack that killed four Americans, including Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens.
 
“There was an accountability review board led by two men of unimpeachable expertise and credibility,” Mr. Carney said, “who oversaw a process that was rigorous and unsparing, that was highly critical in some areas and that produced a series of recommendations that have all been acted on by the State Department, as the president insisted be the case.”
 
Gregory Hicks, Mr. Stevens‘ deputy and one of the top American diplomats in Libya during the attack, has criticized that review, saying it let people “off the hook.” The State Department's Office of Inspector General now is investigating the findings of the review board, Fox News has reported.
 
Mr. Hicks also told congressional investigators last month that a special forces team in Tripoli, Libya, was told to stand down and not respond to the attack at a U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi despite its close proximity. In Mr. Hicks‘ estimation, a second wave of attacks on a nearby CIA annex in Benghazi could have been prevented if the U.S. military could have scrambled a flight when it first learned of the attacks, which would go on for seven hours.
 
Pentagon officials have said they didn’t have military assets in position to launch such an air assault, and Mr. Hicks has acknowledged concerns that refueling tankers were not close enough to the nearest fighter jets.
 
Mr. Carney said he “didn’t have access to” Mr. Hicks‘ interview and referred reporters to the Department of Defense and the Accountability Review Board.

He also repeated an assertion first made last week, arguing that the White House is “not aware of anyone being blocked from talking to Congress if they chose or wanted to speak to Congress.”
 
Mark. I. Thompson, a former Marine who now serves as the deputy coordinator for operations in the State Department’s Bureau of Counterterrorism, also has told congressional investigators that then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton effectively cut the bureau out of the decision-making loop that night. Mr. Thompson also is set to testify Wednesday.
 
State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki has called the allegation “100 percent false,” and Daniel Benjamin, who ran the department’s Counterterrorism Bureau at the time, also put out a statement Monday morning strongly denying the charges.
 
“I ran the bureau then, and I can say now with certainty, as the former coordinator for counterterorrism, that this charge is simply untrue,” he said. “Though I was out of the country on official travel at the time of the attack, I was in frequent contact with the department. At no time did I feel that the bureau was in any way being left out of deliberations that it should have been part of.”
 
Mr. Carney also directly denied Mr. Thompson’s claim Monday, citing Mr. Benjamin’s statement.


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/6/white-house-tries-deflect-criticism-benghazi-whist/#ixzz2SbXqISwJ


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Kilika on May 07, 2013, 12:16:38 pm
Quote
Hillary Rodham Clinton effectively cut the bureau out of the decision-making loop that night. Mr. Thompson also is set to testify Wednesday

Yet more bodies left in the wake of a Clinton.

Quote
At no time did I feel that the bureau was in any way being left out of deliberations that it should have been part of.”

That whole government "need to know" Mr. Benjamin?  ::)


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on May 08, 2013, 08:21:14 pm
'WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?'
http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/article/2013/may/07/context-hillary-clintons-what-difference-does-it-m/

White House struggles to respond to new Benghazi revelations...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/8/white-house-stands-its-benghazi-story-hearing-unfo/

Shock testimony from witnesses...
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57583388/benghazi-whistleblowers-head-to-house-committee/

Moment-by-moment account of attack...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/breaking-news/2013/may/8/benghazi-breaking-news-congress-set-probe-potentia/

Emotional recollection of murders...
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/benghazi-whistleblower-chokes_721903.html

CONGRESSMAN: 'Death is part of life'...
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/benghazi-whistleblower-chokes_721903.html

Fourth whistleblower blocked from testifying...
http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/08/fourth-benghazi-witness-gagged-by-red-tape/

Diplomat Says Questions Led to Demotion...
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/09/us/politics/official-offers-account-from-libya-of-benghazi-attack.html

Dick Morris: Beginning of end...
http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/dick-morris/298369-benghazi-beginning-of-end
dick morris hasnt been right in YEARS!!!

REPORT: CBSNEWS BOSSES IRKED BY CORRESPONDENT'S REPORTING; 'DANGEROUSLY CLOSE TO ADVOCACY'...
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2013/05/08/report-cbs-news-bosses-irked-by-correspondents-thorough-benghazi-reporting-n1591242

Hillary in spotlight...
http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/middle-east-north-africa/298395-new-evidence-in-benghazi-probe-puts-the-spotlight-back-on-clinton

MOTHER: 'I BLAME HER'...
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/05/07/mother_of_slain_benghazi_victim_rips_hillary_clinton_i_blame_her.html



Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on May 11, 2013, 07:28:13 am
Benghazi Talking Point Revised 12 Times

New details from the investigation of last year's Sept. 11 assault on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, reveal 12 revisions were made to the talking points about the attack.
     
Edits included the State Department referencing al Qaeda and prior CIA warnings.     
     
The versions obtained by ABC News show how the drafts evolved from the CIA's original version to the final draft distributed to Congress, which was used by U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice on five Sunday talk shows following the attack.
     
White House press secretary Jay Carney contends the edits were "stylistic and non-substantive."
 
"The CIA drafted these talking points and redrafted these talking points," Carney said. "The fact that there are inputs is always the case in a process like this, but the only edits made by anyone here at the White House were stylistic and nonsubstantive."
 
"This all has been discussed and reviewed and provided in enormous levels of detail by the administration to Congressional investigators, and the attempt to politicize the talking points, again, is part of an effort to, you know, chase after what isn't the substance here," he added.

http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2013/May/Benghazi-Talking-Point-Revised-12-Times/


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on May 11, 2013, 07:45:31 am
(http://cnsnews.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/cartoon_550/images/Foden20130510-WWBenghazi.jpg)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AR3XTOjZPfg



Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Kilika on May 12, 2013, 02:58:17 am
They are trying so hard to package her for 2016.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 12, 2013, 09:59:17 pm
They are trying so hard to package her for 2016.

If we make it to 2016(looking at the faster rate things are going on alone, doesn't look like it) - but only the Lord's will be done.

With that being said, yeah - wouldn't surprise me if the 2016 race is between Hillary and Jeb Bush. Either way, the winner will be given the prize of putting that last nail in the coffin.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 15, 2013, 10:32:24 am
Why is Boehner Resisting a Special Committee on Benghazi?
5/15/13
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/05/why_is_boehner_resisting_a_special_committee_on_benghazi.html

Some things don't stack up. On Monday, Politico headlined that Speaker John Boehner was fixated with the bubbling Benghazi scandal. In fact, Politico termed the speaker's fixation as "big."

So why is Boehner dragging his feet on empanelling a special (or select) committee to tackle the Benghazi disaster? Why is the speaker standing pat on last week's statement that House standing committees are getting the investigative job done?

Most everyone has Boehner's snapshot: cautious by nature, a Washingtonized pol who'd rather play than fight. But, as Politico contends, the speaker is invested in the growing Benghazi controversy. Politico outlined the speaker's behind-the-scenes involvement:

With Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) as the public face and the speaker's office as the muscle, House Republicans are turning turn [sic] the story of the Sept. 11, 2012, attack in Libya that left four Americans dead from a mesh of confusing details into a defining political fight with President Barack Obama.

And more from Politico:

Starting last fall, Boehner has run a Capitol-wide campaign to keep turf-conscious committee chairs informed, at the same time using his sway to press the Obama administration to comply with congressional investigators trying to untangle what happened.

The speaker has privately strategized with high-profile GOP senators like John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and held briefings for top committee figures like House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.).

Boehner has told leadership colleagues when they're focusing on the terrorist attack, they're fighting on their political ground.

"This is all Boehner," said one senior Republican aide of the focus on Benghazi. "He's obsessed with it. He brings it up all the time." The sentiment was echoed with conversations throughout leadership, and the dynamic is acknowledged by his own aides.

As The Hill reported last week, why would Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA), who's pushing hard for a special committee, intimate that the speaker would be "complicit" in a White House cover-up if he failed to get a select committee up and running?

Wolf has rounded up a large majority of his House Republican colleagues to support his push. Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, notably, have made public and direct calls to Boehner urging the committee.

We could take at face value Boehner's insistence that the House's standing committees are doing their jobs in outing the scandal's facts and will eventually hold to account those culpable for the disaster and cover-up.

Perhaps Boehner -- ever cautious -- wants more time to see how the State Department's internal review of the disaster plays out before triggering a select committee. But as White House Dossier reports:

There is no mention in the report of the what Clinton or Obama did related to Benghazi. In fact, Obama isn't mentioned at all in the document, and Clinton only once -- in the context of her appointing the Review Board. There is no suggestion that Clinton or Obama were interviewed or even examined by the investigation.

Strategically, Boehner may think that a multiplicity of committees investigating Benghazi protracts the controversy, which redounds to the GOP's advantage as the nation approaches the 2014 midterm elections.

Or perhaps Boehner sees a special committee as taking away his captaincy of the issue, given his current strong behind-the-scenes role.

Or maybe some combination of all of the above with other considerations thrown in for good measure.

At the American Spectator yesterday, Jed Babbin asks:

Will Boehner have the guts to pass Wolf's bill? He should, for a host of reasons both substantive and political. In a Friday editorial the Wall Street Journal wrote, "Across this country's history, the murder of an American ambassador, the nation's representative, has been taken as not merely a tragedy but an attack on U.S. interests that demands an official accounting to the American people." With the Journal providing cover for him, Boehner has no excuse to not pass it.

As Babbin explains, a select committee becomes the focal point of the investigation, a powerful consolidated entity that will create a unified narrative and command media attention.

Writes Babbin:

The select committee would, under Wolf's bill, have the power to subpoena witnesses and documents. So who's getting subpoenaed this week? Is Obama resisting the document subpoenas? Has he claimed executive privilege yet? What did Hillary's spokeswoman, Victoria Nuland, say in her deposition? It's easy to see that creating a select committee could have one overriding effect: the White House should be as tied up with it as Congress was with Obamacare. Our politicians spent about eighteen months on that without a break.

Give Boehner credit: he's been engaged on Benghazi, pushing the issue ahead. But, clearly, a select committee is in order. Practically, the speaker risks more if he defies his conference by continuing to stall on making a special committee a reality.

Boehner understands that there's much a stake over Benghazi -- for the nation, for justice, for his party, and his speakership. The speaker needs to yield, and soon.


Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/05/why_is_boehner_resisting_a_special_committee_on_benghazi.html#ixzz2TNLIDdpU
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on May 16, 2013, 10:33:06 am
Benghazi Emails Directly Contradict White House Claims

The White House on Wednesday released 94 pages of emails between top administration and intelligence officials who helped shape the talking points about the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that the CIA would provide to policymakers in both the legislative and executive branches.

The documents, first reported by THE WEEKLY STANDARD in articles here and here, directly contradict claims by White House press secretary Jay Carney and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the revisions of those talking points were driven by the intelligence community and show heavy input from top Obama administration officials, particularly those at the State Department.
 
The emails provide further detail about the rewriting of the talking points during a 24-hour period from midday September 14 to midday September 15. As THE WEEKLY STANDARD previously reported, a briefing from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence shows that the big changes came in three waves – internally at the CIA, after email feedback from top administration officials, and during or after a meeting of high-ranking intelligence and national security officials the following morning.

The initial CIA changes softened some of the language about the participants in the Benghazi assault – from “Islamic extremists with ties to al Qaeda” to “Islamic extremists.” But CIA officials also added bullet points about the possible participation of Ansar al Sharia, an al Qaeda-linked jihadist group, and previous warnings about the deteriorating security situation in Benghazi. Those additions came out after the talking points were sent to “the interagency,” where the CIA’s final draft was further stripped down to little more than boilerplate. The half dozen references to terrorists – both in Benghazi and more generally – all but disappeared. Gone were references to al Qaeda, Ansar al Sharia, jihadists, Islamic extremists, etc. The only remaining mention was a note that “extremists” had participated in the attack.
 
As striking as what appears in the email traffic is what does not. There is no mention of the YouTube video that would become a central part of the administration’s explanation of the attacks to the American people until a brief mention in the subject line of emails coming out of an important meeting where further revisions were made.
 
Carney, in particular, is likely to face tough questioning about the contents of the emails because he made claims to reporters that were untrue. “The White House and the State Department have made clear that the single adjustment that was made to those talking points by either of those two – of these two institutions were changing the word ‘consulate’ to ‘diplomatic facility,’ because the word ‘consulate’ was inaccurate,” he told reporters on November 28, 2012.
 
That’s not true. An email sent at 9:15 PM on September 14, from an official in the CIA’s Office of Public Affairs to others at the agency, described the process this way. “The State Department had major reservations with much or most of the document. We revised the document with their concerns in mind.”
 
That directly contradicts what Carney said. It’s also difficult to reconcile with claims made by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during testimony she gave January 23 on Capitol Hill.
 
“It was an intelligence product,” she said, adding later that the “intelligence community was the principal decider about what went into talking points.” (See here for the original version of the talking points and the final one.)
 
Carney and other top Obama administration officials have long maintained that CIA officials revised the talking points with minimal input from Obama administration officials. The claim made little sense when they made it – why would CIA officials revise on their own a set of talking points they’d already finalized? The emails demonstrate clearly that it isn’t true.
 
Another CIA email, this one a draft of a message for CIA director David Petraeus, noted that the talking points process had “run into major problems,” in part because of the “major concerns” raised by the State Department. That same email reported that the issues would be revisited at the Deputies Committee meeting on Saturday morning.

Elsewhere, CIA officials seemed to understand that the document had been stripped of most of its content. An email from an official with the CIA’s Office of Terrorism Analysis, the office that drafted the original version of the talking points, signed off on the final version but seemed to understand that the new version wouldn’t please those who had requested it. “They are fine with me,” this CIA official wrote. “But, pretty sure HPSCI [the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence] won’t like them. :-)”
 
When Petraeus received the rewritten talking points, he objected. “Frankly, I’d just as soon not use this,” he wrote to a legislative affairs staffer. But he declined to put up a fight. 
 
The documents answer some questions and raise many others. Did Hillary Clinton have any role in the efforts of State Department staffers to push for the many substantive revisions to the talking points? Clinton, who testified that she was a hands-on part of the State Department’s response to the attacks, has claimed she had nothing to do with the talking points.
 
And what about the administration’s claims that State and White House officials weren’t involved with substantive edits? In one email, Jake Sullivan, deputy chief of staff to Hillary Clinton, reports to State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland that he’s spoken with Obama’s top spokesman at the National Security Council, Tommy Vietor. “I spoke with Tommy. We’ll work through this in the morning and get comments back.”
 
In a separate email, he writes: “Talked to Tommy. We can make edits.”

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/newly-released-benghazi-emails-directly-contradict-white-house-claims_724603.html


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 16, 2013, 12:21:33 pm
Unless the Illuminati really want Obama out, this "scandal" will eventually die out. Otherwise, it will be nothing more than "puppet show" entertainment while other draconian legislation(ie-immigration reform and possibly gun control) gets pushed through quietly. Same happened with the whole Joe Wilson/Scooter Libby fiasco 6 years ago.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 17, 2013, 04:50:55 pm
Ron Paul Agrees With Obama: The Debate Over Benghazi Is A ‘Sideshow’
5/17/13
http://www.mediaite.com/online/ron-paul-agrees-with-obama-the-debate-over-benghazi-is-a-sideshow/

Could President Obama have read this op-ed by Ron Paul before his joint press conference with British Prime Minister David Cameron this morning? The president’s assessment of the Benghazi scandal was remarkably similar to that of the former congressman. Both men called the controversy a “sideshow.”

While Obama primarily went after Republicans for trying to politicize his administration’s response to the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya last September, Paul chose a more equal opportunity approach in his article, published this morning on the website of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.

Quote
“Congressional hearings, White House damage control, endless op-eds, accusations, and defensive denials. Controversy over the events in Benghazi last September took center stage in Washington and elsewhere last week. However, the whole discussion is again more of a sideshow. Each side seeks to score political points instead of asking the real questions about the attack on the US facility, which resulted in the death of US Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.”

Paul accused Republicans of smelling “political opportunity over evidence that the Administration heavily edited initial intelligence community talking points about the attack to remove or soften anything that might reflect badly on the president or the State Department.” But he also went after Democrats for offering “the even less convincing explanation for Benghazi, that somehow the attack occurred due to Republican sponsored cuts in the security budget at facilities overseas. With a one trillion dollar military budget, it is hard to take this seriously.”

“Neither side wants to talk about the real lesson of Benghazi,” Paul wrote. “Interventionism always carries with it unintended consequences.” He repeated his disdain with both sides of the argument in his conclusion:

Quote
“The real lesson of Benghazi will not be learned because neither Republicans nor Democrats want to hear it. But it is our interventionist foreign policy and its unintended consequences that have created these problems, including the attack and murder of Ambassador Stevens. The disputed talking points and White House whitewashing are just a sideshow.”

Paul’s son, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), has been far less even-handed in his public remarks on the Benghazi controversy, recently saying the events should “preclude” Hillary Clinton from holding political office.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on August 14, 2013, 05:42:52 am
Filmmaker Blamed for Benghazi Attacks Speaks in First TV Interview

In his first television interview since being released, the filmmaker who produced the YouTube video blamed for inciting the 9/11 attacks in Benghazi urged the Obama administration to be more careful in its assessments in the future. He was released from a Texas jail last week after serving an eleven-month sentence and is currently living in a halfway house, where he said the government is currently “hiding” him.

“Before you do anything, please give yourself time to think about it,” Nakoula Basseley Nakoula advised the administration on Tuesday in an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper.

Nakoula said he was “shocked” when he first heard reports that his film had triggered riots, but added that he does not blame the president for alleging that his film incited protests outside of the American diplomatic facility in Benghazi that preceded the attack on the building and the murders of four Americans. “We need to make [a separation] between the president and the administration,” he said. When asked if held a grudge against former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, however, or whether the administration’s claims, now widely debunked, put his life in danger, Nakoula declined to comment.

Just days after last year’s September 11 attacks in Benghazi, Libya, Nakoula was arrested and charged with a parole violation for a bank-fraud conviction. President Obama, Clinton, and then–U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice blamed Nakoula’s film for the attack.

video: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/355704/filmmaker-blamed-benghazi-attacks-speaks-first-tv-interview-andrew-johnson


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Boldhunter on August 30, 2013, 10:10:16 am
Hmmmm - Scapegoat? Puppet? Or does he even exist?


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 30, 2013, 10:47:55 am
Hmmmm - Scapegoat? Puppet? Or does he even exist?

Who? Obama or that youtube filmmaker?

Personally, it just seems like this whole (ungodly)world(ie-everything you see on tv) is nothing more than a puppet show to deceive the masses. Not that I endorse Bill Cooper, but pretty much in his research, he pretty much came to this conclusion over how the Illuminati operates through their occult practices.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on September 03, 2013, 09:21:30 am
Book: Clinton's State told Benghazi was a 'terrorist attack' minutes after it began

Just minutes after 35 jihadists crashed through the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, nearly one year ago, the facility got word to the State Department, FBI and Pentagon that terrorists were attacking, according to a forthcoming book that provides the fullest review of the assault to date.
 
In “Under Fire, the Untold Story of the Attack in Benghazi,” it is revealed that an unidentified security official in the Benghazi compound protecting Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens messaged the U.S. embassy in Tripoli: “Benghazi under fire, terrorist attack.” Stevens and three others died that night.
 
Twenty-five minutes after it began, the operation center at State received an electronic cable announcing the attack, according to authors Fred Burton, a former State Diplomatic Security agent and Samuel Katz, an author and expert on international special operations and counterterrorism.

rest: http://washingtonexaminer.com/clintons-state-told-benghazi-was-a-terrorist-attack-minutes-after-it-began/article/2535081


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 03, 2013, 11:15:36 am
Book: Clinton's State told Benghazi was a 'terrorist attack' minutes after it began

Just minutes after 35 jihadists crashed through the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, nearly one year ago, the facility got word to the State Department, FBI and Pentagon that terrorists were attacking, according to a forthcoming book that provides the fullest review of the assault to date.
 
In “Under Fire, the Untold Story of the Attack in Benghazi,” it is revealed that an unidentified security official in the Benghazi compound protecting Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens messaged the U.S. embassy in Tripoli: “Benghazi under fire, terrorist attack.” Stevens and three others died that night.
 
Twenty-five minutes after it began, the operation center at State received an electronic cable announcing the attack, according to authors Fred Burton, a former State Diplomatic Security agent and Samuel Katz, an author and expert on international special operations and counterterrorism.

rest: http://washingtonexaminer.com/clintons-state-told-benghazi-was-a-terrorist-attack-minutes-after-it-began/article/2535081

It's as if they're telegraphing their punches WIDE OPEN like this(in a NON-fictional book), but en yet not many will listen, nor care.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on September 21, 2013, 10:38:12 am
BENGHAZI 'INNOCENCE OF MUSLIMS' FILMMAKER TO BE RELEASED MONDAY

Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the filmmaker falsely blamed by for 2012's terrorist attack in Benghazi, tells Breitbart News he will be released from prison Monday and will finish his sentence at a half-way house facility.

Nakoula is not going back to his original home, as he has privacy and safety concerns.

“I’m still okay. I’m better, but I’m worried, because I’m afraid," says Nakoula, an Egyptian-born Coptic Christian from Southern California. "Anything can happen—not from Muslim people. I’m not afraid of them, but from something else. I just don’t want to go back to jail again.”

Nakoula, who will immediately begin his probation, says he looks forward to seeing his children again and has aspirations to visit Washington, D.C. In the meantime, he plans to look for a job and apparently find stability in his life.

While serving his sentence, he wrote a book titled Innocence; it is currently available on Amazon.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/09/20/Benghazi-Filmmaker-To-Be-Released-Monday


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on September 23, 2013, 09:35:36 am

Egypt bans Muslim Brotherhood group

CAIRO (AP) — An Egyptian court on Monday ordered the Muslim Brotherhood to be banned and its assets confiscated in a dramatic escalation of a crackdown by the military-backed government against supporters of the ousted Islamist president Mohammed Morsi.

Associated Press
http://news.yahoo.com/egypt-bans-muslim-brotherhood-group-120620175.html


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on October 28, 2013, 07:33:44 am
First Western eyewitness in Benghazi to go public gives account of attack, warning signs

The witness -- a former British soldier who for decades helped protect U.S. diplomats and military leaders -- told CBS’ “60 Minutes” that Al Qaeda forces first attacked the U.S. Special Mission Compound in which Ambassador Christopher Stevens was killed. Then they launched a second attack on a secret CIA annex about a mile across the city. “They knew what they were doing,” the security guard told CBS. “That was a well-executed attack.” 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/10/28/report-first-western-eyewitness-in-benghazi-to-go-public-gives-account-attack/?intcmp=latestnews


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on November 11, 2013, 05:35:22 am
'60 MINUTES' Airs Apology on Benghazi...
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/11/business/media/60-minutes-airs-apology-on-benghazi.html

Simple web search would have saved humiliation...
http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/60-minutes-bungles-benghazi-even-worse/

I feel that his whole CBS bungled story is meant to have been a failure in reporting. I’m thinking this is to get the story out of the headlines permanently, and to "justify" why the MSM is going after their messiah like they should be on this.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Christian40 on November 14, 2013, 03:46:11 am
Pentagon Report: Obama Regime Paid More than $150 Million to Fund Terrorist Attacks Against Americans

"As Americans struggle to make ends meet, as the current economic climate is anything but healthy, the Obama Regime is pumping millions of dollars into foreign companies that finance attacks on Americans.

Surely, there is a better use for our money than financing terrorism against our own people.

The national debt is just over $17.1 trillion dollars. Specifically, it is $17,162,395,935,482.18- or, at least it was when this article was written. In the time it took to type the numbers, the U.S. borrowed another $195,976. By this time tomorrow, the national debt will have increased by roughly $2,690,000,000.

We our hemorrhaging money at an astonishing rate and saddling Americans with unconscionable debt. A million here, a million there-money we don’t have is tossed around and thrown away like dropped pennies in a parking lot while our “leaders” not only refuse to make any meaningful changes to our unsustainable economic model, but make future plans for how to enlarge government and spend even more money.

And while that may seem like a betrayal of Americans, it cannot compare to the fact that America has given $150 million to groups that fund terrorists actions against Americans.

In our nation’s Quixotic quest to make the world love us, the U.S. has been funding terrorism against Americans. In a report by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, the Pentagon has admitted that we are subsidizing at least 43 companies that are linked to Taliban leaders who have targeted and arranged attacks on Americans.

    “It’s like the United States government subsidizing the Taliban, al Qaeda, the Haqqani network, those groups that are trying to shoot and kill our soldiers,” New Hampshire Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen stated.

The Haqqani network is responsible for the 2011 attack on the American embassy in Kabul that left 16 dead. The Haqqani Network, rather than receiving money directly from the U.S., receives its money from a road construction company owned by the Haqqani Network that received a government contract from the U.S.

However, this is merely one such example of the U.S. funding terrorism; in all, the Pentagon report lists 43 private companies that receive government money and fund terrorism.

    “The reason they’ve given us is that it’s not fair to these contractors that the evidence that we’ve presented, and this is evidence collected by the United States government, is classified,” said Special Inspector General John Sopko.

    “That’s the absurdity of it. We can probably attack them via drone on Monday and we’ll issue them a contract on Tuesday,” Sopko continued.

Though the report’s revelations are startling, the Pentagon has been unwilling to immediately pull the contracts due to bureaucratic red tape. The Army has, however, released a statement saying that they will not be issuing new contracts to the companies. The statement also stopped short of indicating that they will be taking any steps to remove the contracts.

“The army takes seriously any allegations of improper contractor activities and has vigorous processes to ensure that those with whom we do business are not supporting the insurgency or otherwise opposing U.S. and collation forces in Afghanistan,” the statement said.

It seems the take-away message for terrorist groups is: If your attacks on Americans are being subsidized by America, we will take a good, long look at whether or not we will continue to fund your attacks. We mean it.

The Obama Administration has made many claims about Republicans being terrorists, bullies and other various slanderous accusations. If the Obama Administration is even remotely interested in stopping real terrorism, the first step should be to, as obvious as it may seem, stop funding companies that are fronts for terrorist organizations."

http://teapartyheadlines.streamshare.com/posts/8403#/8403


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 14, 2013, 10:56:00 am
Wow - they are really spending these millions like they're board game play money.


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on December 29, 2013, 05:24:20 am
NY Times makes up story to help Hillary Clinton in 2016 run for president...

Top 3 Shocking Claims in NY Times Benghazi Report

A voluminous investigative piece published Saturday by The New York Times offers a number of startling revelations on the September 2012 Benghazi attacks, but the big three would appear to be as follows:
 
1. There’s “no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault,” the Times reported.
 
2. “The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi.”

But what may be the most surprising alleged unearthing, given the “yes it was responsible-no it wasn’t responsible” outcries surrounding it…
 
3. The Times reported that the attack was indeed “fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam.”
 
The Times noted the uprising’s “two contradictory story lines”:
 

One has it that the video, which was posted on YouTube, inspired spontaneous street protests that got out of hand. This version, based on early intelligence reports, was initially offered publicly by Susan E. Rice, who is now Mr. Obama’s national security adviser.
 
The other, favored by Republicans, holds that Mr. (Christopher) Stevens died in a carefully planned assault by Al Qaeda to mark the anniversary of its strike on the United States 11 years before. Republicans have accused the Obama administration of covering up evidence of Al Qaeda’s role to avoid undermining the president’s claim that the group has been decimated, in part because of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.

The Times report noted that the “reality in Benghazi was different, and murkier, than either of those story lines suggests.”
 
Benghazi “was not infiltrated by Al Qaeda, but nonetheless contained grave local threats to American interests. The attack does not appear to have been meticulously planned, but neither was it spontaneous or without warning signs,” the Times reported.
 
Then this:
 

The violence, though, also had spontaneous elements. Anger at the video motivated the initial attack. Dozens of people joined in, some of them provoked by the video and others responding to fast-spreading false rumors that guards inside the American compound had shot Libyan protesters. Looters and arsonists, without any sign of a plan, were the ones who ravaged the compound after the initial attack, according to more than a dozen Libyan witnesses as well as many American officials who have viewed the footage from security cameras.
 
The issue of the anti-Islam video fueling anger that led to the attacks was an initial claim, which was soon overshadowed by a determination that Benghazi was a terrorist attack, an issue that seemed to raise the ire of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
 
Check out the entire New York Times article here: http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2013/benghazi/?/?chapt=0#/?chapt=0

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/12/28/top-3-shocking-claims-in-ny-times-benghazi-report/


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on December 08, 2015, 07:34:22 pm
Judicial Watch Releases ‘Compelling Benghazi Email’ It Says ‘Worsens the Scandal of Benghazi’

A conservative government watchdog group released a new Benghazi email Tuesday that then-Department of Defense Chief of Staff Jeremy Bash sent to the State Department offering military forces that could have moved into the area.

Bash sent his email — obtained by Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit — to three senior State Department officials just hours after the deadly 2012 attacks initially unfolded.

[W]e have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi,” he wrote. “They are spinning up as we speak.”

The email was sent to Jacob Sullivan, who served as deputy chief of staff to Hillary Clinton. Wendy Sherman and Thomas Nides were both senior State Department officials.

Much of the email was redacted, but it seemingly contradicted testimony from the Obama administration that an immediate response was not feasible. Then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta testified in 2013 that “time, distance, the lack of an adequate warning, events that moved very quickly on the ground prevented a more immediate response.”

Gregory Hicks, Deputy Chief of Mission to the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, had previously testified that even a single fighter jet scrambled after the attack “would have been scared to death” the enemy “that we would have gotten a laser on them and killed them.”

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton released a statement Tuesday after the publication of the email.

“The Obama administration and Clinton officials hid this compelling Benghazi email for years,” Fitton said. “The email makes readily apparent that the military was prepared to launch immediate assistance that could have made a difference, at least at the CIA Annex. The fact that the Obama Administration withheld this email for so long only worsens the scandal of Benghazi.”

Conservative political super PAC American Crossroads also released a statement, going particularly after Clinton.

“After years of spin, deception, and distraction from President Obama and Hillary Clinton, this email makes it clear that the Obama Administration and then-Secretary Clinton had a chance to save the four Americans killed in Benghazi – and shamefully did nothing,” said the organization’s director, Ian Prior.

The Clinton campaign did not respond to a request for comment from TheBlaze Tuesday evening.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/12/08/judicial-watch-releases-compelling-benghazi-email-it-says-worsens-the-scandal-of-benghazi/


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on December 09, 2015, 06:43:35 pm
Hillary now denies blaming video to Benghazi victims' families

The media obsessed with Donald Trump’s memory of “thousands” of Muslims celebrating 9/11 are giving a total pass to Hillary Clinton over her shameless lie Sunday.  Appearing on This Week with George Stephanopoulos, she averred to her husband’s former aide that she never told family members that she blamed an anti-Islam video for the deaths of four Americans in the Benghazi attack, and that the video maker would pay.  This contradicts the accounts of four separate survivors.

Guy Benson of Hot Air has the story:

… by the time the murdered Americans’ flag-draped coffins arrived home several days later, the Obama administration was in full-blown election season spin mode, which entailed muddying the waters on whether the deadly raid was, in fact, a premeditated terrorist attack.  At the now-infamous Andrews Air Force base ceremony on September 14, 2012, Hillary Clinton told grieving family members that their loved ones had been murdered by a bloodthirsty mob incited by an online anti-Islam video.  Four different relatives of three separate victims have publicly shared that recollection, including one who jotted down notes shortly after the meeting:

https://youtu.be/jkpZzlZBI3M

“I gave Hillary a hug and shook her hand. And she said ‘we are going to have the film maker arrested who was responsible for the death of your son,'” recalls Tyrone Woods’ father, reading directly from his written record from that day. Sean Smith’s mother and uncle remember the same thing, as does Glen Doherty’s sister.  Now watch Hillary’s performance from this past Sunday.  Note how anchor George Stephanopoulos, to his credit, asks a very specific question, preceded by clips of statements from several of the aforementioned family members:

https://youtu.be/jAUDS-aLGjI

STEPHANOPOULOS: Did you tell them it was about the film? And what’s your response?

CLINTON: No. You know, look I understand the continuing grief at the loss that parents experienced with the loss of these four brave Americans. And I did testify, as you know, for 11 hours. And I answered all of these questions. Now, I can’t — I can’t help it the people think there has to be something else there. I said very clearly there had been a terrorist group, uh, that had taken responsibility on Facebook, um, between the time that, uh, I – you know, when I talked to my daughter, that was the latest information; we were, uh, giving it credibility. And then we learned the next day it wasn’t true. In fact, they retracted it. This was a fast-moving series of events in the fog of war and I think most Americans understand that.

It is now Wednesday, and outside the conservative blogosphere, nobody in the media is interested in Hillary’s blatant lie.  And her implication that grieving family members lied.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/12/hillary_now_denies_blaming_video_to_benghazi_victims_families.html#ixzz3tsGKel2o


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on March 09, 2016, 11:08:56 pm
Clinton Says Benghazi Victim’s Mother Is ‘Absolutely Wrong’ [VIDEO]

Hillary Clinton said during Wednesday’s debate that the mother of one of the four Americans killed in the Benghazi attacks is “absolutely wrong” when she says that Clinton and other Obama administration officials personally told her that a Youtube video was the catalyst for the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attacks.

“She’s wrong. She’s absolutely wrong,” Clinton told debate moderator Jorge Ramos when asked about comments made last year by Patricia Smith, the mother of State Department information officer Sean Smith.

During an interview with CNN in October, Smith said that during a memorial service for her son and the other Benghazi victims held on Sept. 14, 2012, Clinton said that the short Youtube movie “Innocence of Muslims” was the catalyst for the attack.

“She’s lying! She’s absolutely lying! She told me something entirely different at the casket ceremony. She said it was because of the video and that she would get back to me and tell me what happened with my son,” Smith told CNN last year.

Clinton offered her sympathies for Patricia Smith and the other victims’ families. But she did not directly address what she did or did not say to them during the memorial service.

“This was fog of war. This was complicated,” Clinton said Wednesday. She also maintained that she does believe that the terrorists who carried out the attack were partially motivated by the video.

WATCH: https://youtu.be/1NXAwDNK2cE

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/09/clinton-says-benghazi-victims-mother-is-absolutely-wrong-video/#ixzz42TPZ86Zh


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3tUR2RnWI4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_no1HPQmkJ0

Fact Check: Hillary came up with Benghazi video explanation
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/11/fact-check-what-hillary-left-out-benghazi-chapter.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ny3bOmey-BE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbJEISrXLRQ

LIAR!!!!


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on March 10, 2016, 06:50:16 pm
Infuriated Benghazi Mom Responds to Clinton: ‘There’s a Special Place in Hell for People Like Her’

The mother of a Benghazi victim lashed out at Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton Thursday, saying Thursday on the Fox Business Network that “there’s a special place in hell” for her.

The blistering comments came one day after Clinton said at a Democratic debate that Patricia Smith was “absolutely wrong” about the accusation she lied to her face.

“We were nose-to-nose at the coffin ceremony. She lied to me,” Smith said, doubling down on her claim. “She told me it was the fault of the video. I said ‘are you sure?’ She says ‘yes, that’s what it was… it was the video.’ And she knew full well it wasn’t at that time. And then she says she was going to check and if it’s any different she would call me back, she would let me know.”

Smith said she had not had any contact with Clinton since.

“She has never once spoken to me or [has] her office,” Smith told Fox Business. “The only thing I ever got out of them is that I am not a member of the immediate family and I don’t need to know… I know what she said. I don’t lie. She’s a proven liar and I call her out for that. I know what I heard.”

The grieving mother said that she would like to talk with Clinton personally.

“I want to speak to her personally and I want to be able to ask her what happened. I want her to be able to tell me what happened. I don’t believe she has the guts to do that,” she said.

Smith concluded her interview drawing on words from Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.

“There’s a special place in Hell for people like her [Clinton] and I hope she enjoys it there!”

video: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/03/10/infuriated-benghazi-mom-responds-to-clinton-theres-a-special-place-in-hell-for-people-like-her/


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on April 15, 2016, 11:41:50 pm
BREAKING: State Dept. Releases Phone Transcript of Hillary Admitting She Knew Benghazi Was Planned Attack

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton blamed an “awful” internet video for the deaths of four Americans in the terror attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi.

Hillary made the comments just three days after the assault on the compound that killed Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

https://youtu.be/r-BWzaYp3qc

Hillary lied—
The State Department released a phone transcipt this week that proves Hillary Clinton knew the Benghazi massacre was a planned attack and not a protest.

Judicial Watch obtained the documents this week.
BizPac Review reported:

The conservative political watchdog group Judicial Watch obtained a transcript of telephone call between the then-secretary of state and then-Egyptian Prime Minister Hisham Kandil.

“We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film,” Clinton told Kandil. “It was a planned attack – not a protest.”

Kandil agreed.

“You’re not kidding. Based on the information we saw today we believe that group that claimed responsibility for this is affiliated with al-Qaida.”

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/04/breaking-state-dept-releases-phone-transcript-hillary-admitting-knew-benghazi-attack-planned-weeks/


Title: Re: Thanks Obama - The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes In Egypt And Libya Are
Post by: Mark on May 04, 2016, 06:18:22 pm
Romanian hacker Guccifer: I breached Clinton server, 'it was easy'

The infamous Romanian hacker known as “Guccifer,” speaking exclusively with Fox News, claimed he easily – and repeatedly – breached former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s personal email server in early 2013.   

"For me, it was easy ... easy for me, for everybody," Marcel Lehel Lazar, who goes by the moniker "Guccifer," told Fox News from a Virginia jail where he is being held.

Guccifer’s potential role in the Clinton email investigation was first reported by Fox News last month. The hacker subsequently claimed he was able to access the server – and provided extensive details about how he did it and what he found – over the course of a half-hour jailhouse interview and a series of recorded phone calls with Fox News. Fox News could not independently confirm Lazar’s claims.

The former secretary of state’s server held nearly 2,200 emails containing information now deemed classified, and another 22 at the “Top Secret” level.

The 44-year-old Lazar said he first compromised Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal's AOL account, in March 2013, and used that as a stepping stone to the Clinton server. He said he accessed Clinton’s server “like twice,” though he described the contents as “not interest[ing]” to him at the time.

“I was not paying attention. For me, it was not like the Hillary Clinton server, it was like an email server she and others were using with political voting stuff," Guccifer said.

The hacker spoke freely with Fox News from the detention center in Alexandria, Va., where he’s been held since his extradition to the U.S. on federal charges relating to other alleged cyber-crimes. Wearing a green jumpsuit, Lazar was relaxed and polite in the monitored secure visitor center, separated by thick security glass.

In describing the process, Lazar said he did extensive research on the web and then guessed Blumenthal’s security question. Once inside Blumenthal's account, Lazar said he saw dozens of messages from the Clinton email address.

Asked if he was curious about the address, Lazar merely smiled. Asked if he used the same security question approach to access the Clinton emails, he said no – then described how he allegedly got inside.

“For example, when Sidney Blumenthal got an email, I checked the email pattern from Hillary Clinton, from Colin Powell from anyone else to find out the originating IP. … When they send a letter, the email header is the originating IP usually,” Lazar explained.

He said, “then I scanned with an IP scanner."

Lazar  emphasized that he used readily available web programs to see if the server was “alive” and which ports were open. Lazar identified programs like netscan, Netmap, Wireshark and Angry IP, though it was not possible to confirm independently which, if any, he used.

In the process of mining data from the Blumenthal account, Lazar said he came across evidence that others were on the Clinton server.

"As far as I remember, yes, there were … up to 10, like, IPs from other parts of the world,” he said.

With no formal computer training, he did most of his hacking from a small Romanian village.

Lazar said he chose to use "proxy servers in Russia," describing them as the best, providing anonymity.

Cyber experts who spoke with Fox News said the process Lazar described is plausible. The federal indictment Lazar faces in the U.S. for cyber-crimes specifically alleges he used "a proxy server located in Russia" for the Blumenthal compromise.

Each Internet Protocol (IP) address has a unique numeric code, like a phone number or home address.  The Democratic presidential front-runner’s home-brew private server was reportedly installed in her home in Chappaqua, N.Y., and used for all U.S. government business during her term as secretary of state. 

Former State Department IT staffer Bryan Pagliano, who installed and maintained the server, has been granted immunity by the Department of Justice and is cooperating with the FBI in its ongoing criminal investigation into Clinton’s use of the private server. An intelligence source told Fox News last month that Lazar also could help the FBI make the case that Clinton’s email server may have been compromised by a third party.

Asked what he would say to those skeptical of his claims, Lazar cited “the evidence you can find in the Guccifer archives as far as I can remember."

Writing under his alias Guccifer, Lazar released to media outlets in March 2013 multiple exchanges between Blumenthal and Clinton. They were first reported by the Smoking Gun.

It was through the Blumenthal compromise that the Clintonemail.com accounts were first publicly revealed.

As recently as this week, Clinton said neither she nor her aides had been contacted by the FBI about the criminal investigation. Asked whether the server had been compromised by foreign hackers, she told MSNBC on Tuesday, “No, not at all.”

Recently extradited, Lazar faces trial Sept. 12 in the Eastern District of Virginia. He has pleaded not guilty to a nine-count federal indictment for his alleged hacking crimes in the U.S. Victims are not named in the indictment but reportedly include Colin Powell, a member of the Bush family and others including Blumenthal.

Lazar spoke extensively about Blumenthal’s account, noting his emails were “interesting” and had information about “the Middle East and what they were doing there.”

After first writing to the accused hacker on April 19, Fox News accepted two collect calls from him, over a seven-day period, before meeting with him in person at the jail. During these early phone calls, Lazar was more guarded.

After the detention center meeting, Fox News conducted additional interviews by phone and, with Lazar's permission, recorded them for broadcast. 

While Lazar's claims cannot be independently verified, three computer security specialists, including two former senior intelligence officials, said the process described is plausible and the Clinton server, now in FBI custody, may have an electronic record that would confirm or disprove Guccifer’s claims.

"This sounds like the classic attack of the late 1990s. A smart individual who knows the tools and the technology and is looking for glaring weaknesses in Internet-connected devices," Bob Gourley, a former chief technology officer (CTO) for the Defense Intelligence Agency, said.   

Gourley, who has worked in cybersecurity for more than two decades, said the programs cited to access the server can be dual purpose. "These programs are used by security professionals to make sure systems are configured appropriately. Hackers will look and see what the gaps are, and focus their energies on penetrating a system," he said.

Cybersecurity expert Morgan Wright observed, "The Blumenthal account gave [Lazar] a road map to get to the Clinton server. ... You get a foothold in one system. You get intelligence from that system, and then you start to move."

In March, the New York Times reported the Clinton server security logs showed no evidence of a breach.  On whether the Clinton security logs would show a compromise, Wright made the comparison to a bank heist: "Let’s say only one camera was on in the bank. If you don‘t have them all on, or the right one in the right locations, you won’t see what you are looking for.”

Gourley said the logs may not tell the whole story and the hard drives, three years after the fact, may not have a lot of related data left. He also warned: "Unfortunately, in this community, a lot people make up stories and it's hard to tell what's really true until you get into the forensics information and get hard facts.”

For Lazar, a plea agreement where he cooperates in exchange for a reduced sentence would be advantageous. He told Fox News he has nothing to hide and wants to cooperate with the U.S. government, adding that he has hidden two gigabytes of data that is “too hot” and “it is a matter of national security.” 

In early April, at the time of Lazar’s extradition from a Romanian prison where he already was serving a seven-year sentence for cyber-crimes, a former senior FBI official said the timing was striking.

“Because of the proximity to Sidney Blumenthal and the activity involving Hillary’s emails, [the timing] seems to be something beyond curious,” said Ron Hosko, former assistant director of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division from 2012-2014.

The FBI offered no statement to Fox News.

There was no immediate response from the Clinton campaign.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/04/romanian-hacker-guccifer-breached-clinton-server-it-was-easy.html


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on May 05, 2016, 01:01:45 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOTrvB4qi-0


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on May 10, 2016, 07:20:22 pm
REPORT: Hillary’s Emails Hacked by Russia – Kremlin Deciding Whether to Release 20,000 Stolen Emails (VIDEO)

The Kremlin is debating whether to release the 20,000 emails they have hacked off of Hillary Clinton’s server.

According to a report from four days ago, beginning in 2011, the Russians began monitoring Romanian computer hacker Marcel Lazăr Lehel (aka Guccifer) after he attempted, unsuccessfully, to break into the computer system of the Russian funded RT television network.

After monitoring Guccifer, the Russians were reportedly able to record (both physically and electronically) his actions which allowed the Russian intelligence analysts, in 2013, to not only detect his breaking into the private computer of Secretary Clinton, but also break in and copy all of its contents as well.

The report notes that shortly after Russia obtained Clinton’s emails, they released a limited amount to RT TV which were published in an article in March 2013, titled Hillary Clinton’s ‘hacked’ Benghazi emails: FULL RELEASE.

(http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/hillary-hacked-emails--575x442.jpg)

Apparently no Western journalists promoted this story in 2013.

A couple of years later, in 2016, the US then brought in Guccifer for questioning related to this incident.  According to the report, NBC news knew why Guccifer was being questioned but withheld this information from the American public.

The Associated Press reported in October 2015 that “Hillary Clinton’s private email server maintained in her home while serving as secretary of State was possibly hacked by Russia-tied authorities, and others, on five separate occasions.”

The AP report noted that investigators discovered among Clinton’s cache of released emails malicious software aimed at transmitting data to three overseas computers, including at least one in Russia. This malicious software was reportedly activated by clicking on it; but in October it was not clear if Clinton actually opened these messages or not, per the AP.

Recently separate reports have come out noting that Guccifer had indeed hacked Clinton’s emails.  Now according to this latest report, Clinton’s server was not only compromised by Guccifer but also by Russia. Guccifer told FOX News last week that he hacked Hillary’s homebrew server and so did at least 10 others.

UPDATE: Judge Andrew Napolitano told Megyn Kelly on Monday,

    “There’s a debate going on in the Kremlin between the Foreign Ministry and the Intelligence Services about whether they should release the 20,000 of Mrs. Clinton’s emails that they have hacked into.”

https://youtu.be/oounggTI-jk

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/05/hillarys-emails-hacked-russia-kremlin-deciding-whether-release-20000-emails-hacked/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on May 10, 2016, 07:31:01 pm
https://www.facebook.com/10157029148580725/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on June 02, 2016, 03:00:23 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUTEIgkOEuQ


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on June 08, 2016, 06:39:33 pm
AP: Hillary Clinton Emails ‘Could Have Compromised CIA Names’

The names of CIA personnel could have been compromised not only by hackers who may have penetrated Hillary Clinton’s private computer server or the State Department system, but also by the release itself of tens of thousands of her emails, security experts say.
Clinton, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, turned over to the State Department 55,000 emails from her private server that were sent or received when she was secretary of state. Some contained information that has since been deemed classified, and those were redacted for public release with notations for the reason of the censorship.

At least 47 of the emails contain the notation “B3 CIA PERS/ORG,” which indicates the material referred to CIA personnel or matters related to the agency. And because both Clinton’s server and the State Department systems were vulnerable to hacking, the perpetrators could have those original emails, and now the publicly released, redacted versions showing exactly which sections refer to CIA personnel.

“Start with the entirely plausible view that foreign intelligence services discovered and rifled Hillary Clinton’s server,” said Stewart Baker, a Washington lawyer who spent more than three years as an assistant secretary of the Homeland Security Department and is former legal counsel for the National Security Agency.

If so, those infiltrators would have copies of all her emails with the names not flagged as being linked to the agency.

In the process of publicly releasing the emails, however, classification experts seem to have inadvertently provided a key to anyone who has the originals. By redacting names associated with the CIA and using the “B3 CIA PERS/ORG” exemption as the reason, “Presto — the CIA names just fall off the page,” Baker said.

The CIA declined to comment.

A U.S. official said the risk of the names of CIA personnel being revealed in this way is “theoretical and probably remains so at this time.” The official, who did not have the authority to publicly address the matter, spoke on condition of anonymity and would not elaborate.

Steven Aftergood, who directs the Federation of American Scientists’ Project on Government Secrecy, said even if any identities were revealed, they might be the names of analysts or midlevel administrators, not undercover operatives.

“I don’t think there’s any particular vulnerability here,” Aftergood said.

Clinton has acknowledged that the email server, set up in the basement of her New York home, was a mistake. But she says she never sent or received anything that was marked classified at the time of transmission. Clinton, who was secretary of state from 2009 to 2013, insists the personal server she used was never actually breached.

The AP discovered last year that Clinton’s private server was directly connected to the internet in ways that made it more vulnerable to hackers. A recent State Department inspector general’s report indicated the server was temporarily unplugged by a Clinton aide at one point during attacks by hackers, but her campaign has said there’s no evidence the server was hacked.

In each year from 2011 to 2014, the State Department’s poor cybersecurity was identified by its inspector general as a “significant deficiency” that put the department’s information at risk. Another State Department inspector general report revealed that hacking attempts forced Clinton off her private email at one point in 2011.

Then in 2014, the State Department’s unclassified email system was breached by hackers with links to Russia. They stole an unspecified number of emails. The hack was so deep that State’s email system had to be cut off from the internet while experts worked to eliminate the infestation.

Baker points out another instance where Clinton’s server might have been hacked.

A March 2, 2009, email warned against State Department officials using Blackberries. Eric Boswell, assistant secretary of state, says the “vulnerabilities and risks associated with the use of Blackberries … considerably outweigh their convenience.”

Nine days later, another email states that Clinton approached Boswell and says she “gets” the risk. The email also said: “Her attention was drawn to the sentence that indicates we (the diplomatic security office officials) have intelligence concerning this vulnerability during her recent trip to Asia.”

Clinton traveled to China, Indonesia, Japan and South Korea in February 2009.

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/06/08/ap-hillary-clinton-emails-could-have-compromised-cia-names/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on June 09, 2016, 08:05:15 pm
Donald Trump Tweets At Hillary Clinton: ‘Where are Your 33,000 Emails that You Deleted’

Presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump is firing back, after presumptive Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton’s tweet telling him to delete his account after he criticized President Obama’s endorsement of Clinton on Thursday.

see tweets : http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/09/donald-trump-tweets-hillary-clinton-33000-emails-deleted/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on June 11, 2016, 05:27:42 pm
Short-Term Memory: Hillary Forgets Four Americans Died in Benghazi

https://youtu.be/5l9-wxnCnu4

Hillary Clinton appeared on PBS News Hour on Wednesday and completely forgot about Ambassador Chris Stevens, Glen Doherty, Sean Smith and Tyrone Woods -- the four Americans who lost their lives during the attack on the Benghazi consulate.

The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee discussed the Obama administration's decisions in Libya with Judy Woodruff, assuring "their efforts… did not cost a single American life:"

"Well, first of all, it's important to remember where we were and why the president made the decision he did, because this was a presidential decision.

"I've advised the president. Sometimes, he follows my advice. Sometimes, he doesn't. Sometimes, he uses a combination of what he hears from his advisers.

"We were looking at a potential disaster, as Qaddafi threatened to massacre large numbers of his population. The Europeans, our Arab allies were urging us to help them to try to prevent that.

"After due diligence, we came up with a way of supporting their efforts that did not cost a single American life. And we saved a lot of Libyan lives."

President Obama told Fox News's Chris Wallace in April that failing to plan for the aftermath of the United State's intervention in Libya was his worst mistake in office. It appears as though Clinton has zero regrets over what's-their-names.

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/short-term-memory-hillary-forgets-four-americans-died-benghazi


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on June 14, 2016, 11:53:48 pm
FBI’s Probe Of Clinton Email Server Is A ‘Criminal Investigation,’ Judge Says Via @dailycaller

The FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server is “criminal” in nature, U.S. District Court judge Emmet Sullivan said in a court filing on Tuesday.

Sullivan was responding to a plea from attorneys for former State Department information technology specialist Bryan Pagliano who asked that details of an immunity deal he made with the FBI to discuss Clinton’s server be kept secret.

“The privacy interests at stake are high because the government’s criminal investigation through which Mr. Pagliano received limited immunity is ongoing and confidential,” Sullivan wrote in the new order.

“In the Court’s opinion, the need for public access to Mr. Pagliano’s agreement with the government is minimal. Mr. Pagliano’s immunity agreement has not previously been disclosed. Mr. Pagliano and the government object to disclosure of the immunity agreement,” the judge added.

Sullivan ordered Pagliano, who was interviewed by the FBI in December, to provide details of the immunity deal earlier this month after his attorneys said that the former Clinton aide would invoke his Fifth Amendment rights in a scheduled deposition with the watchdog group Judicial Watch.

That deposition, which is one of eight that the conservative watchdog is conducting for its lawsuit, was postponed indefinitely.

Pagliano’s lawyers filed the immunity agreement under seal, but they did provide new details about the arrangement with the FBI, which is looking into whether classified information was mishandled on Clinton’s server.

The IT worker was granted a “limited” or “use” immunity as opposed to “blanket” immunity. That means that his statements cannot be used against him in any criminal proceeding. Any information obtained by other means could be used in any prosecutorial maneuver.

Sullivan’s statement that the FBI’s investigation is criminal undermines Clinton’s insistence that the probe is a mere “security review.”

Pagliano’s deposition, whenever it is finally held, will be videotaped, Sullivan ordered. Pagliano’s lawyers had asked the judge to prohibit Judicial Watch from recording the deposition. They said that since Pagliano will be pleading the Fifth, there is no reason to record the session. They also expressed concern that Judicial Watch would use the footage to make Pagliano look bad. But Sullivan said that the recording cannot be released publicly.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/14/fbis-probe-of-clinton-email-server-is-a-criminal-investigation-judge-says/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on June 15, 2016, 06:49:52 pm
RUSSIA PREPARING RELEASE OF INTERCEPTED EMAILS FROM HILLARY’S HACKED ILLEGAL SERVER

(http://www.freesmfhosting.com/gallery/endtimesandcurrentevents/1_20_08_12_7_47_52.gif)

Reliable intelligence sources in the West have indicated that warnings had been received that the Russian Government could in the near future release the text of email messages intercepted from U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail server from the time she was U.S. Secretary of State. The release would, the messaging indicated, prove that Secretary Clinton had, in fact, laid open U.S. secrets to foreign interception by putting highly-classified Government reports onto a private server in violation of U.S. law, and that, as suspected, the server had been targeted and hacked by foreign intelligence services.

WASHINGTON DC – SOURCES ARE REPORTING THAT THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT IS PREPARED TO RELEASE PRIVATE EMAILS THAT IT OBTAINED FROM HILLARY CLINTON’S EMAIL SERVER, PROVING CLINTON ALLOWED CLASSIFIED INFORMATION TO END UP IN THE HANDS OF FOREIGN ADVERSARIES.

Intelligence sources are bracing for the Russian release of Clinton’s intercepted emails, according to a report in the trade publication Oilprice.com:

RELIABLE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES IN THE WEST HAVE INDICATED THAT WARNINGS HAD BEEN RECEIVED THAT THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT COULD IN THE NEAR FUTURE RELEASE THE TEXT OF EMAIL MESSAGES INTERCEPTED FROM U.S. PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HILLARY CLINTON’S PRIVATE E-MAIL SERVER FROM THE TIME SHE WAS U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE. THE RELEASE WOULD, THE MESSAGING INDICATED, PROVE THAT SECRETARY CLINTON HAD, IN FACT, LAID OPEN U.S. SECRETS TO FOREIGN INTERCEPTION BY PUTTING HIGHLY-CLASSIFIED GOVERNMENT REPORTS ONTO A PRIVATE SERVER IN VIOLATION OF U.S. LAW, AND THAT, AS SUSPECTED, THE SERVER HAD BEEN TARGETED AND HACKED BY FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SERVICES.

These sources echo similar reports that Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service has numerous Clinton emails, which it obtained by monitoring the hacker Guccifer, who broke into Clinton adviser Sidney Blumenthal’s email account.

NEWS ALERT: THE RUSSIANS SAY THEY HAVE 20,000 OF HILLARY CLINTON’S HACKED EMAILS

https://youtu.be/1ZQMjs_WMfo

Clinton exchanged highly classified national defense information on her private server and kept her own State Department IT desk in the dark about her use of private email. Clintoncould be found guilty of violating the Espionage Act if she is found to have allowed that information to be “lost, stolen, or abstracted” through “gross negligence.”

Breitbart News has led the media in reporting on the espionage investigation into Clinton’s email use. Breitbart News first reported, based on high-level government sources, that “Top Secret” classified emails existed on Clinton’s non-secure private server and that multiple Clinton emails were classified when they were sent. Clinton’s email system was targeted on at least five occasions by Russian-linked hack attempts.

Additionally, Clinton’s non-secure personal Blackberry suffered a security “vulnerability” on her official overseas trip as Secretary of State to China and other East Asian countries. The State Department warned Clinton about the problem and told her not to use her Blackberry anymore for email, but Clinton ignored that warning.

The Clinton campaign is currently reeling from an exclusive Breitbart News reportshowing that she posted and shared the names of CIA-protected covert intelligence sources on her non-secure server. The scandal, which has been picked up by the Associated Press and others, recalls the Bush administration’s Valerie Plame scandal.

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has also claimed that his organization is in possession of damaging Clinton emails.

“We have upcoming leaks in relation to Hillary Clinton, which is great, WikiLeaks has a very big year ahead. We have emails related to Hillary Clinton which are pending publication, that is correct,” Assange said in an interview.

Wikileaks has so far released approximately 32,000 private Clinton emails. source

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/russia-preparing-release-of-hillary-clinton-hacked-emails/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on June 17, 2016, 09:20:10 am
https://www.yahoo.com/news/hillary-clinton-invokes-unlikely-allies-000000292.html
6/17/16
Hillary Clinton invokes unlikely allies on the stump — the Bushes

Hillary Clinton praised a former president to a crowd of cheering liberal supporters earlier this month as “absolutely committed” and unwavering in his support of one of her causes.

The man she spoke of was not her husband, Bill Clinton, or Barack Obama, whom she hopes to succeed. It was George W. Bush — long one of the left’s most potent villains.

In an unusual election year, when a quarter of Republicans say they do not have a favorable opinion of their presumptive nominee, Clinton is making striking overtures to conservatives even as she works to shore up support on the left flank of her party by winning over Sen. Bernie Sanders’ liberal backers.

That’s included surprisingly warm talk about both former Presidents Bush, as well as GOP icon Ronald Reagan. At a campaign stop in Westminster, Calif., earlier this month, Clinton said she was fortunate enough to have known “a lot of presidents.”

“I knew President George H.W. Bush, and he was always willing to talk about issues and ask what was on your mind,” she said. Of his son, she offered more specific praise, saying he was “absolutely committed” after 9/11 to his promise to get New York City the billions of dollars it needed to rebuild. “He never wavered and I’ll never forget that,” she said of Bush, as a few supporters clapped tepidly. (At Nancy Reagan’s funeral in March, a CNN journalist posted a photo of the two hugging.)

Earlier this week, Clinton cited Bush again in her first remarks addressing the terrorist attack in Orlando, praising him for speaking at a Muslim community center just six days after the 9/11 attacks to send a message that the American Muslim community should not be blamed for them.

The next day, in another campaign speech, Clinton mentioned the letter Bush Sr. left for her husband after Bill Clinton defeated him in the bruising 1992 election. Bush wrote that he was “rooting” for Clinton to succeed, since his success was now the country’s success. “It moved me to tears, just like it did all those years ago,” she said. “That’s the America we love. That is what we cherish and expect.”

Clinton uses the Bushes to draw a contrast with Trump, who she argues does not have the “temperament” to put country first as previous presidents, conservative and liberal, have. (In April, her campaign made this point via Snapchat, using the “face swap” feature to mash Trump’s face with those of Reagan, the Bushes and Abraham Lincoln while playing Trump’s comments about abortion, Mexican immigrants and the Ku Klux Klan.) She also frequently criticizes Bush on the stump, saying he left an economic “mess” for Obama to clean up with his policies. But the praise is still striking, especially given that it started while Clinton was battling a primary opponent who ran to her left. She runs the risk of alienating Sanders supporters, who are already suspicious of Clinton as insufficiently progressive.

Waxing nostalgic about past Republican presidents is not usually a great Democratic primary strategy. In 2008, when Clinton was fighting Obama for the nomination, she criticized him during a debate for previously calling Reagan a “transformational president.” “You talked about admiring Ronald Reagan … and you talked about the ideas of the Republicans. … I didn’t talk about Ronald Reagan,” Clinton said. Obama shot back by digging up and citing Clinton’s paean to Reagan in a then-newly published book by Tom Brokaw.

But it seems like in this election, for Clinton at least, praising past Republican leaders is no longer taboo.  That’s due in part to the opportunity the Clinton campaign sees in wooing disenchanted conservative and independent voters.

Last week, in a speech announcing her historic status as the first woman to lead a major party in the U.S., Clinton explicitly called upon Republicans to vote for her. “This election is not, however, about the same old fights between Democrats and Republicans,” she said. “This election is different. It really is about who we are as a nation.” She added: “And if you agree — whether you’re a Democrat, Republican or independent — I hope you’ll join us.”

Some already have. Former Minnesota Gov. Arne Carlson announced his support in an op-ed this week, as have GOP donor Meg Whitman and political operatives who worked for Sen. John McCain and Gov. Mitt Romney.

Republican consultant Liz Mair, who runs an anti-Trump super-PAC, said she believes Clinton’s strategy of praising the Bushes could help her “lock down” conservative national security hawks who have concerns about Trump as commander in chief and are leaning toward Clinton.

But will it alienate liberals, especially those who wanted the political “revolution” Sanders promised? “There are certainly liberals who won’t like this, but they’re the same people who don’t like Hillary Clinton’s votes on the Iraq War, or surveillance policy or her general hawkishness anyway — and those people have already shown, by and large, that they’ll fall in line and back her,” Mair said.

Clinton is also buoyed by the fact that liberals strongly dislike Trump and are motivated to vote against him and thus, for her. The Clinton campaign points to poll numbers that show 20 percent of Sanders voters say they would choose Trump over Clinton, lower than the 26 percent of Clinton voters who said they would support McCain over Obama at the same time in 2008.

Clinton’s remarks on the Bushes are also not just political strategy — they reflect a genuine mutual regard between her family and the Bushes, politics aside. George W. Bush wrote in his memoir, “Decision Points,” that his father and Bill Clinton enjoyed one of the “more unlikely friendships in American political history.” They worked together on relief efforts after the 2004 tsunami and in fundraising for Hurricane Katrina, and Clinton and both Bushes flew together to attend Pope John Paul II’s funeral. He wrote in his memoir that his mother jokingly referred to Clinton as his stepbrother, given the father-son-like relationship Clinton had developed with Bush Sr. Bush has called Clinton his “brother from another mother,” and he joked in an interview with CNN that Hillary Clinton is like his sister-in-law.

The friendship between these two American dynasties does not erase their political differences, however, and neither of the Presidents Bush seem likely to join the conservatives who have backed Clinton. But they also won’t back Trump, who has arguably criticized George W. Bush more harshly than Clinton has this election. (Trump said Bush didn’t keep the country “safe” and lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but has since backed off those critiques.) After former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush lost his primary bid, both Bushes said they would sit out this election entirely.



Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on June 21, 2016, 06:32:47 pm
Clinton IT Aide Scheduled for Deposition in Records Lawsuit Wednesday

Hillary Clinton’s personal IT aide will face questions about his involvement in setting up her private email server in a court deposition on Wednesday.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/clinton-aide-scheduled-deposition-records-lawsuit-wednesday/

(http://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-why-do-i-have-to-keep-proving-to-people-that-i-am-not-a-liar-hillary-clinton-65-48-22.jpg)


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on June 24, 2016, 06:35:48 pm
Hillary Clinton Failed to Hand Over Key Email to State Department

Former Secretary Hillary Clinton failed to turn over a copy of a key message involving problems caused by her use of a private homebrew email server, the State Department confirmed Thursday. The disclosure makes it unclear what other work-related emails may have been deleted by the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee. 

The email was included within messages exchanged Nov. 13, 2010, between Clinton and one of her closest aides, Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin. At the time, emails sent from Clinton’s BlackBerry device and routed through her private clintonemail.com server in the basement of her New York home were being blocked by the State Department’s spam filter. A suggested remedy was for Clinton to obtain a state.gov email account.

“Let’s get separate address or device but I don’t want any risk of the personal being accessible,” Clinton responded to Abedin.

Clinton never used a government account that was set up for her, instead continuing to rely on her private server until leaving office.

The email was not among the tens of thousands of emails Clinton turned over to the agency in response to public records lawsuits seeking copies of her official correspondence. Abedin, who also used a private account on Clinton’s server, provided a copy from her own inbox after the State Department asked her to return any work-related emails. That copy of the email was publicly cited last month in a blistering audit by the State Department’s inspector general that concluded Clinton and her team ignored clear internal guidance that her email setup violated federal standards and could have left sensitive material vulnerable to hackers.

“While this exchange was not part of the approximately 55,000 pages provided to the State Department by former Secretary Clinton, the exchange was included within the set of documents Ms. Abedin provided the department in response to our March 2015 request,” State Department spokesman John Kirby told The Associated Press on Thursday.

Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said she provided “all potentially work-related emails” that were still in her possession when she received the 2014 request from the State Department.

“Secretary Clinton had some emails with Huma that Huma did not have, and Huma had some emails with Secretary Clinton that Secretary Clinton did not have,” Fallon said.

Fallon declined to say whether Clinton deleted any work-related emails before they were reviewed by her legal team. Clinton’s lead lawyer, David Kendall, did not respond to a request for comment Thursday.

The November 2010 email was among documents released under court order Wednesday to the conservative legal advocacy group Judicial Watch, which has sued the State Department over access to public records related to the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee’s service as the nation’s top diplomat between 2009 and 2013. The case is one of about three dozen lawsuits over access to records related to Clinton, including one filed by the AP.

Before turning over her emails to the department for review and potential public release, Clinton and her lawyers withheld thousands of additional emails she said were clearly personal, such as those involving what she described as “planning Chelsea’s wedding or my mother’s funeral arrangements, condolence notes to friends as well as yoga routines, family vacations.”

Clinton has never outlined in detail what criteria she and her lawyers used to determine which emails to release and which to delete, but her 2010 email with Abedin appears clearly work-related under the State Department’s own criteria for agency records under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act.

Dozens of the emails sent or received by Clinton through her private server were later determined to contain classified material. The FBI has been investigating for months whether Clinton’s use of the private email server imperiled government secrets. Agents recently interviewed several of Clinton’s top aides, including Abedin.

As part of the probe, Clinton turned over the hard drive from her email server to the FBI. It had been wiped clean, and Clinton has said she did not keep copies of the emails she choose to withhold.

On Wednesday, lawyers from Judicial Watch, a conservative legal organization, questioned under oath Bryan Pagliano, the computer technician who set up Clinton’s private server. A transcript released Thursday shows Pagliano repeatedly responded to detailed questions by invoking his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, as he did last year before a congressional committee.

Dozens of questions Pagiliano declined to answer included who paid for the system, whether there was technical help to support its users and who else at the State Department used email accounts on it. Pagliano also would not answer whether he discussed setting up a home server with Clinton prior to her tenure as secretary of state, according to the transcript.

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said the November 2010 email cited in the inspector general audit was one of several work-related emails that his group identified that Clinton sent or received but later failed to turn over the State Department.

“Contrary to her statement under oath suggesting otherwise, Mrs. Clinton did not return all her government emails to the State Department,” Fitton said. “Our goal is to find out what other emails Mrs. Clinton and the State Department are hiding.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/hillary-clinton-failed-hand-over-223533331.html?nhp=1


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on June 24, 2016, 06:51:43 pm
AP: Hillary Clinton Destroyed Gov’t Email, Wiped Names From Her Calendar

The week ends with a double whammy for Hillary Clinton, courtesy of the Associated Press, which discovered that dozens of names and events have been scrubbed from her official Secretary of State calendar, and also confirmed that Clinton destroyed at least one work-related email stored on her illicit email server.
The latter revelation has a distinct whiff of “smoking gun” about it. The deleted email was between Clinton and her aide Huma Abedin. When Abedin suggested that Clinton should start using the state.gov email account that Clinton was supposed to be using, the Secretary of State replied, “Let’s get separate address or device, but I don’t want any risk of the personal [email] being accessible.”

This frank email was not among the records Clinton reluctantly handed over to the State Department, long after she departed from office. We only know about it because Abedin included a copy among her work-related emails.

“That copy of the email was publicly cited last month in a blistering audit by the State Department’s inspector general that concluded Clinton and her team ignored clear internal guidance that her email setup violated federal standards and could have left sensitive material vulnerable to hackers,” the Associated Press recalls.

Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon attempted to dismiss the importance of this discovery by saying, “Secretary Clinton had some emails with Huma that Huma did not have, and Huma had some emails with Secretary Clinton that Secretary Clinton did not have.”

The Clinton campaign apparently assumes no one understands how email works, and that no one will care that Clinton signed documents, under oath, certifying that she had returned all work-related correspondence to the State Department.

Most of all, they’re gambling that everyone will forget Clinton is under scrutiny for deleting some 30,000 emails on her own judgment that they were personal messages, unrelated to her work as Secretary of State.

We now have confirmation she destroyed at least one official email – the Associated Press notes that her exchange with Abedin “appears clearly work-related under the State Department’s own criteria for agency records under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act.” How many others will we learn about?

(Hint: watchdog group Judicial Watch says it has identified at least a dozen more work-related emails that were not in Clinton’s production to the State Department.)

As for Clinton’s scrubbed Secretary of State calendar, the AP says “no known federal laws were violated and some omissions could be blamed on Clinton’s highly fluid schedule, which sometimes forced late cancellations.”

It certainly does look suspicious, though, and it fits no one’s definition of transparent government:

The AP review of Clinton’s calendar — her after-the-fact, official chronology of the events of her four-year term — identified at least 75 meetings with longtime political donors and loyalists, Clinton Foundation contributors and corporate and other outside interests that were either not recorded or listed with identifying details scrubbed. The AP found the omissions by comparing the 1,500-page document with separate planning schedules supplied to Clinton by aides in advance of each day’s events. The names of at least 114 outsiders who met with Clinton were missing from her calendar, the records show.

The missing entries raise new questions about how Clinton and her inner circle handled government records documenting her State Department tenure — in this case, why the official chronology of her four-year term does not closely mirror other more detailed records of her daily meetings.

At a time when Clinton’s private email system is under scrutiny by an FBI criminal investigation, the calendar omissions reinforce concerns that she sought to eliminate the “risk of the personal being accessible” — as she wrote in an email exchange that she failed to turn over to the government but was subsequently uncovered elsewhere.

The Clinton campaign made its usual ritual declaration of commitment to “transparency,” and said the calendar omissions “simply reflect a more detailed version in one version as compared to another, all maintained by her staff,” but the AP seems more than a little skeptical of that breezy dismissal – probably because it took them two years just to make the State Department admit Clinton’s calendar existed, followed by a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. To date, only a third of Clinton’s planners have been released.

“The missing or heavily edited entries in her calendar included private dinners with political donors, policy sessions with groups of corporate leaders and ‘drop-bys’ with old Clinton campaign hands. Among those whose names were omitted from her calendar were longtime adviser Sidney Blumenthal, consultant and former Clinton White House chief of staff Thomas ‘Mack’ McLarty, former energy lobbyist Joseph Wilson and entertainment magnate and Clinton campaign bundler Haim Saban,” notes the Associated Press.

There was also quite a bit of money changing hands after a particularly One Percenter breakfast Clinton held with Wall Street leaders in 2009, whose guests included CEOs whose companies later “donated to Clinton’s pet diplomatic project of that period, the U.S. pavilion at the 2010 Shangai Expo.” The guests lobbied the State Department while Clinton was in charge, and made donations to the Clinton Foundation. Their names were all scrubbed from the official Secretary of State calendar, but are now exposed because of the Associated Press.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/24/clinton-destroyed-official-emails-scrubbed-state-dept-calendar-names-events/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on June 29, 2016, 06:06:22 pm
REPORT FINDS HILLARY IN 'DERELICTION OF DUTY'
Former top military, intel brass counter House Benghazi report


Hillary Clinton is guilty of “dereliction of duty” for her actions before, during and after the terrorist attack that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012, according to a report released Wednesday by a citizens group that features many former military and intelligence officials.



The Citizens’ Committee on Benghazi, CCB, released its final report on Wednesday at the National Press Club in Washington.

Leadoff speaker Clare Lopez, vice president for research and analysis at the Center for Security Policy, criticized U.S. Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, for not holding Clinton and the State Department under her direction responsible for the Benghazi attack.

Lopez said Clinton “wielded cross-border authority as the terrorist attack in Benghazi unfolded.”

“Why didn’t she request the deployment of U.S. military resources that stood ready to launch a rescue mission the CCB concluded we now know could have reached Benghazi in time to thwart the attack and save American lives?”

The truth is even worse than what you thought. “Hillary: The Other Woman,” the explosive new book exposing the horrible history of Bill and Hillary Clinton. Available now at the WND Superstore.

Lopez charged Clinton’s role in the Benghazi debacle was “pivotal.”

She said that under Clinton’s leadership, State Department “changed sides” in the war on terrorism in Libya.

“Secretary Clinton knowing undertook a foreign policy to abet and assist the Muslim Brotherhood, a direct enemy of the United States in the Middle East, to come to power across Northern Africa and in particular in Libya,” Lopez said.

Clinton instructed the State Department “to abandon Moammar Gadhafi, an ally of the United States who had given up his terrorist ambitions, deciding to change sides, implementing a policy to facilitate the deliver of weapons to the al-Qaida-dominated rebel militia seeking to oust Gadhafi from power.”

“That was the origin of the terrorist attack in Benghazi.”

‘My son would still be alive’

Charles Woods, the father of Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods, who died in the final hours of the attack, also spoke.

“My son and the rest would still be alive if there were any attempt made at a rescue,” Woods insisted. “Ty, as a Navy SEAL, had been in many difficult situations, and it was in his DNA to expect a rescue mission in Benghazi.

“I want to know who was responsible for my son’s death,” he demanded.

Woods said the problem is that President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta have changed their stories multiple times.

“The Obama administration has either withheld key documents or destroyed them,” he said.

‘Cover-up bigger than Watergate’

Retired Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney, a CCB member, addressed from a military perspective why the Obama administration failed to launch a military rescue mission during the Benghazi attack.

“The military resources available in Italy should have been on alert on Sept. 11, 2012, just knowing the significance of 9/11 to radical Islamic terrorists,” McInerney insisted.

“So we had no pre-planning of the possibility of a terrorist attack in the region on that day and while the attack was underway no U.S. military assets were moved into action. At least a fly-by over Benghazi could have been arranged, with F-16s using full after-burners that could have dispersed the terrorists and ended the attack.”

McInerney demanded to know where President Obama was during the Benghazi attack.

“The Obama administration is terrified yet today that the truth about what happened at Benghazi will come out,” he insisted.

“The truth is Benghazi involved a dereliction of duty by both Secretary Clinton and President Obama. Then, Clinton and Obama engaged in a cover-up, aided by the mainstream media, bigger than Watergate.”

Gowdy ‘copped out’

Retired Adm. James “Ace” Lyons joined in the attack on the House Select Committee on Benghazi, contending that Gowdy “copped out.”

“Gowdy was there as chairman of the select committee with the charge to find out who was responsible, and he failed to do so,” Lyons said.

Lyons agreed with McInerney that it was the responsibility of the U.S. military to have been prepared for a terrorist attack in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012.

“My gut tells me the U.S. commanders in the region were professional, and I’m confident they would have done their duty to be prepared for a terrorist attack in Benghazi, given the intelligence that was available before the attack,” he explained.

“What happened the night of the attack?” he asked. “I am confidant someone told the U.S. military not to deploy to Benghazi as the attack unfolded. This is more than incompetence or a dereliction of duty. The terrorist attack at Benghazi was un-Americans. We just don’t refuse to come to the assistance of American military under attack.”

Lyons insisted that as head of the State Department, Clinton was “running the show” in Benghazi.

“The State Department had a clear choice in Benghazi,” he insisted. “Hillary Clinton had a choice – either beef up security at the Benghazi compound or close it down.

“Hillary Clinton did neither.”


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/report-finds-hillary-in-dereliction-of-duty/#helEi1seV5BiBrGL.99


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on June 29, 2016, 06:20:45 pm
Clinton Says It’s ‘Time to Move On’ From Benghazi — But Victim’s Mother Still Wants Answers

Hillary Clinton believes it’s time to put Benghazi in the past, now that the Republicans have released their report, but one victim’s mother doesn’t feel like she’s received any answers from the former secretary of state.

“I’ll leave it to others to characterize this report, but I think it’s pretty clear it’s time to move on,” the presumptive Democratic nominee said Tuesday with a smirk.

But, for Patricia Smith, mother of slain U.S. information management officer Sean Smith, “It is definitely not time to move on” because “it has not been dealt with.”

Asked if there’s anything that could provide her closure to the deadly Benghazi attack, Smith said to “see Hillary in stripes” is the only thing that would vindicate her son’s untimely passing.

“I think she ought to be made to acknowledge what she did, and she has not,” Smith told Fox Business host Deidre Bolton Tuesday. “So far, all she has done is lied and people are believing her.”

Smith recounted her conversation with Clinton and State Department officials, who she claims told her she could not receive information regarding her son because she was “not part of the immediate family.” The mother said she has still not heard anything more from the government.

“People of America, this is still what your country does to you,” she said. “[Clinton] still has not spoken to me, or anybody in her group, telling me what happened.”

Toward the end of her conversation with the Fox anchor, Smith pleaded for the media to “do something” and have Clinton “say something” that could provide her with answers about the Benghazi attack in September 2012 — even if that means a direct call from the politician.

“Have her call me!” Smith said emphatically. “I’m still waiting. Hillary, I’m waiting for what you promised me. All I heard was you getting on TV calling me a liar. That’s not true, Hillary. I am not the liar. You are the liar.”

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/06/29/clinton-says-its-time-to-move-on-from-benghazi-but-victims-mother-still-wants-answers/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on June 30, 2016, 05:48:15 pm
State Department Won’t Release Clinton Foundation Emails for 27 Months

Department of Justice officials filed a motion in federal court late Wednesday seeking a 27-month delay in producing correspondence between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s four top aides and officials with the Clinton Foundation and Teneo Holdings, a closely allied public relations firm that Bill Clinton helped launch.

If the court permits the delay, the public won’t be able to read the communications until October 2018, about 22 months into her prospective first term as President. The four senior Clinton aides involved were Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Michael Fuchs, Ambassador-At-Large Melanne Verveer, Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, and Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/30/exclusive-state-department-wont-release-clinton-foundation-emails-for-27-months/#ixzz4D6cQx5QW


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on July 05, 2016, 01:21:30 pm
FBI Director James Comey: We Will Not Indict Hillary Clinton Even Though There is 'Evidence' of Violations -

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) director James Comey said Tuesday at a press conference that he will not recommend an indictment against Hillary Clinton, though he found “evidence” that she might have violated laws pertaining to the handling of classified information.

Comey announced a number of conclusions that support the findings of Breitbart News’ coverage of the Clinton private email scandal, including that she sent and received information on her private server that was classified. Comey said that 110 of Clinton’s emails were classified at the time they were sent.

Comey said that “although there is evidence of potential violations,” no reasonable prosecutor would take on the case.

Comey at least shared details about that damning evidence.

He also said that seven of Clinton’s email chains contained “Top Secret” information.

“That is excluding any later up-classified emails… None of these emails should have been on any unclassified system, but the presence of these emails is especially concerning,” Comey said.

“There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position… should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that information,” Comey continued.

“There is evidence that they were extremely careless,” he said, referring to Clinton and her aides.

Comey also noted that individuals in a similar situation would not necessarily be let off the hook with no charges, but would probably face penalties. “But that’s not what we’re deciding now,” Comey said. “We are expressing to Justice our view that no charges be made in this case.”

Comey said that “no outside influence of any kind was brought to bear” on the investigation, even though Attorney General Loretta Lynch recently held a secret meeting with President Bill Clinton.

Comey said the investigation was conducted in an “apolitical and professional way… I couldn’t be prouder to be part of this organization.”

Then he walked off.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/07/05/fbi-director-james-comey-we-will-not-indict-hillary-clinton-even-though-there-is-evidence-of-violations/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on July 08, 2016, 06:57:32 pm
Marine Officer Under Fire Wants Same Treatment as Hillary Clinton

A U.S. Marine officer facing involuntary discharge for improperly handling classified information is hoping to receive the same lenient treatment the FBI recommended for former secretary of state Hillary Clinton.

Maj. Jason Brezler has been embroiled in a legal battle since December 2014. Brezler is facing an involuntary discharge from the service after he admitted sending classified information to an unclassified email address in 2012. He was trying to warn fellow Marines about a corrupt police chief in Afghanistan. Several weeks later, a deputy of that police chief killed three Marines in a rifle attack.

An internal review in 2013 recommended that Brezler be removed from the service for possessing classified material, a decision that remains under appeal. However, both the Marine Corps and the Navy Department have already upheld the initial recommendation.

Brezler’s attorney, Michael J. Bowe, has said he plans to cite the FBI’s treatment of Clinton “as one of the many, and most egregious examples” of how Brezler’s punishment was unduly harsh, especially given that Brezler’s situation involved “infinitely less sensitive and limited information.”

FBI director James Comey declined to recommend charges against Hillary Clinton, despite his determination that her handling of classified information over an unauthorized private email server was “extremely careless.”

A federal judge is expected to rule on Brezler’s case in October.

Attorney’s for other individuals charges with mishandling classified information are also seizing on Clinton’s case in an effort to win more favorable treatment for their clients.

“By Comey’s wording [about Clinton], now we have a floor as to what constitutes intent that deserves prosecution,” Mark Zaid, a defense attorney for national security whistleblowers, told U.S. News & World Report

http://heatst.com/politics/marine-hillary-clinton/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on July 10, 2016, 08:58:01 pm
Comey Insists Clinton Email Probe Not Swayed by Politics

(http://www.freesmfhosting.com/gallery/endtimesandcurrentevents/1_20_08_12_7_47_52.gif)


For more than four and a half hours July 7, lawmakers pressed FBI Director James Comey on his perplexing recommendation not to prosecute Hillary Clinton despite her mishandling of classified information as secretary of state. Unwavering in his judgment, Comey called Clinton’s actions careless and sloppy but short of criminal and claimed the FBI could not prove bad intent.
 
“There are two things that matter in a criminal investigation of the subject: What did the person do? And when they did that thing, what were they thinking?” Comey told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. “When I look at the facts here, I see evidence of great carelessness, but I do not see evidence that is sufficient to establish Secretary Clinton or those with whom she was corresponding, both talked about classified information on email and knew when they did it they were doing something that was against the law.”
 
Comey tried to explain what he meant by saying no reasonable prosecutor would take a case against Clinton. He vowed it has nothing to do with the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee’s fame or political connections. Comey said Clinton’s actions were undeniably wrong, and probably should have consequences but insisted a criminal charge against her was not appropriate.
 
Tempers flared as Republicans tried to get the FBI director to say Clinton broke the law.
 
“What does it take for someone to misuse classified information and get in trouble for it?” Rep. Will Hurd, R-Texas, asked.
 
“It takes mishandling it and criminal intent,” Comey said.
 
“And so an unauthorized server in the basement is not mishandling?” Hurd retorted.
 
Hurd, along with his Republican colleagues, raised concerns that Comey set a dangerous precedent for top officials to be careless with sensitive information and face no consequences.
 
Through its investigation, the FBI verified Clinton used a private email server stored in the basement of her home in New York. Hundreds of emails sent and received on that server contained classified material and at least eight email chains contained top-secret information.
The server did not have round-the-clock security, and Comey said Clinton’s private system was less secure than a free Gmail account.
 
Comey said the FBI could find no evidence anyone hacked into her emails but admitted no one can prove it never happened.
 
Democrats lauded Comey for his integrity during the investigation and thanked him for not swaying to partisan interests.
 
“I firmly believe your decision was not based on convenience but on conviction,” Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., told Comey.
 
Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., noted no one on the committee can be objective in this case: “I can’t be objective, I have endorsed Hillary Clinton for president.”
 
Republicans also face objectivity challenges since they oppose Clinton’s candidacy, Lieu said, concluding they should accept Comey’s decision as an impartial investigator.
 
The FBI director agreed and told the committee his agency “does not give a hoot” about Republicans or Democrats. Agents conducted the Clinton investigation without political motivation, he said.
 
Comey remained resolute during the long hours of questioning—even refraining from using the restroom. But questions of the timing of his press conference on July 5 and possible collusion with Clinton supporters touched a nerve: “Look me in the eye and listen to what I’m about to say, I did not coordinate with anyone. The White House, the Department of Justice, nobody outside of the FBI had any idea what I was about to say. I say that under oath and I stand by that.”
 
Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah., told reporters after the hearing he’s equally unnerved: “I still can’t believe there are no consequences for what she did.”
 
Chaffetz pressed Comey about who had access to Clinton’s private server, drawing from Comey’s earlier statement that Clinton’s lawyers reviewed her emails. Chaffetz said it’s one thing to store a private server with classified information, but it’s another to allow people without security clearance to browse through it.
 
“Did Hillary Clinton give non-cleared people access to classified information?” he asked.
“Yes,” Comey responded.
 
Chaffetz vowed a follow-up to the investigation, even though the Department of Justice officially closed the case Tuesday evening.
 
In the flurry of bringing Comey in to testify, less than 48 hours after his press conference, Chaffetz has not talked to House Speaker Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., about the next steps to explore possible consequences for Clinton.
 
But early this morning, Ryan took action on his own. He wrote a letter to Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, requesting he revoke Clinton’s security clearance.
 
“As a former vice presidential nominee, I am keenly aware that Secretary Clinton is set to begin receiving classified intelligence briefings after the Democratic National Convention,” Ryan wrote. “Given the FBI’s findings, denying Secretary Clinton access to classified information certainly constitutes appropriate sanctions.”

http://www.christianheadlines.com/blog/comey-insists-clinton-email-probe-not-swayed-by-politics.html


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on July 13, 2016, 07:48:41 pm
FBI agents signed NDA for matters involving Hillary’s emails.

In an unusual move, FBI agents working the Hillary Clinton email case had to sign a special form reminding them not to blab about the probe to anyone unless called to testify.

Sources said they had never heard of the “Case Briefing Acknowledgment” form being used before, although all agents must initially sign nondisclosure agreements to obtain security clearance.

“This is very, very unusual. I’ve never signed one, never circulated one to others,” said one retired FBI chief.

An FBI agent currently on the job admitted, “I have never heard of such a form. Sounds strange.”

Meanwhile, FBI agents expressed their “disappointment” over FBI Director James Comey’s decision not to recommend charges against Clinton, sources close to the matter told The Post.

“FBI agents believe there was an inside deal put in place after the Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton tarmac meeting,” said one source.

Another source from the Justice Department was “furious” with Comey, saying he’s “managed to **** off right and left.”

http://nypost.com/2016/07/12/fbi-agents-signed-nda-for-matters-involving-hillarys-emails/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 02, 2016, 09:53:50 pm
Father of Benghazi Victim: Either Hillary Is a Liar or Has a Bad Memory From Head Injury

Charles Woods, the father of Tyrone Woods, one of the Benghazi soldiers who was killed defending his fellow Americans on the night of September 11, 2012, had something to say to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton on Tuesday regarding her interview on Fox News Sunday. During her conversation with Chris Wallace, Clinton suggested she had not lied to the Benghazi victims’ families and told them the terror attack was actually the spontaneous reaction to an offensive internet video. She held no “ill feeling” toward the family members because their memories must just be fuzzy, she insisted.

When Fox News anchor Bill Hemmer played the relevant exchange for Woods, who was hearing the audio for the first time, he responded indignantly.

“There are two options,” Mr. Woods said. “One, either she is lying, or she has a bad memory because of her age or head injury she’s suffered.”

Woods continued to explain that according to his recollection Clinton told him his son’s death was the result of a YouTube video. It’s the same thing she told the other family members, he added.

It wasn’t just in private – she then repeated the same lie to the American public at Joint Base Andrews in front of our fallen Americans.

“She stood in front of my son’s casket and blamed the rage directed at U.S. embassies” on a video, Woods said.

The media has been skewered this week for offering an outsized amount of coverage to the feud between Donald Trump and the Khan family, while offering little coverage of Hillary Clinton's behavior toward the Benghazi family members.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2016/08/02/father-of-benghazi-victim-either-hillary-is-a-liar-or-has-a-bad-memory-from-head-injury-n2201035


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 05, 2016, 06:40:38 pm
ANOTHER MYSTERIOUS DEATH=> Activist and Sanders Supporter Who Served Papers to DNC on Fraud Case Found Dead

On July 3, 2016, Shawn Lucas and filmmaker Ricardo Villaba served the DNC Services Corp. and Chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz at DNC’s headquarters in Washington, D.C., in the fraud class action suit against the Democrat Party on behalf of Bernie Sanders supporters.

Shawn Lucas was thrilled about serving the papers to the DNC before Independence Day.

https://youtu.be/D3FMgZruOXE

According to Snopes Lucas was found dead on his bathroom floor.

We contacted Lucas’ employer on 4 August 2016 to ask whether there was any truth to the rumor. According to an individual with whom we spoke at that company, Shawn Lucas died on 2 August 2016. The audibly and understandably shaken employee stated that interest in the circumstances of Lucas’ death had prompted a number of phone calls and other queries, but the company had not yet ascertained any details about Lucas’ cause of death and were unable to confirm anything more than the fact he had passed away.

An unconfirmed report holds that Lucas was found lying on the bathroom floor by his girlfriend when she returned home on the evening of 2 August 2016. Paramedics responding to her 911 call found no signs of life.

This follows the death of 27 year-old Democratic staffer Seth Conrad Rich who was murdered in Washington DC on July 8. The killer or killers appear to have taken nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone.

Shortly after the killing, Redditors and social media users were pursuing a “lead” saying that Rich was en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to special agents about an “ongoing court case” possibly involving the Clinton family.

And on June 22, 2016, former UN official John Ashe “accidentally” crushed his own throat and died a week before he was scheduled to testify against the Clintons and Democrat Party.

John Ashes died before his court appearance.
He crushed his throat… while exercising.

It’s all probably just a strange coincidence, right?

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/breaking-lead-attorney-dnc-fraud-case-found-dead-1-week-serving-dnc-papers/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 05, 2016, 06:42:58 pm
THE CLINTON BODY-COUNT

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.php


90 SUSPICIOUS DEATHS OF INDIVIDUALS CLOSE TO BILL CLINTON, 81 WHILE PRESIDENT.

http://www.freewebs.com/jeffhead/liberty/liberty/bdycount.txt




Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 07, 2016, 05:28:09 pm
Did Clinton emails doom Iranian nuke scientist to death?

One of the non-classified Hillary Clinton emails released by the State Department last year may have convinced the Iranian government that a nuclear scientist who claimed he was kidnapped by the CIA was actually a defector and spy for the US.

At the time that the email was released, the press picked up on the bizarre story.

CNN:

New Hillary Clinton emails released by the State Department appear to lift the curtain on the bizarre circumstances surrounding Shahram Amiri, an Iranian nuclear scientist who claims to have been abducted by the CIA.

The just-released emails, which were sent to Clinton back in 2010, seem to support what State Department sources have long maintained: that Amiri was not abducted, but a defector and paid informant who changed his mind about helping the U.S.

The emails also appear to offer insight into the department's plans to get Amiri back to Iran safely.

Amiri's complicated story began in 2009, when he mysteriously disappeared while on a religious pilgrimage in Saudi Arabia. Almost immediately, Tehran accused the U.S. of abducting him. The U.S. denied the accusation, saying it had no knowledge of Amiri's whereabouts.

Fast forward to nearly a year later, when a series of videos surfaced online of a man claiming to be Amiri.

In them, he denied being a defector and claimed to have been hiding out from CIA operatives in Virginia. In a subsequent video, however, he said he was living freely in Arizona.

Two weeks later, on July 14, 2010, CNN reported that Amiri had returned to Tehran after going to Iran's interest section at the embassy of Pakistan in Washington. CNN's report appears to directly correspond with an email Clinton's top foreign policy adviser Jake Sullivan sent her, now being released by the State Department.

In the email -- written two days before the CNN report -- Sullivan expressed fear of the media catching wind of the story, writing: "The gentleman you have talked to Bill Burns about has apparently gone to his country's interests [sic] section because he is unhappy with how much time it has taken to facilitate his departure. This could lead to problematic news stories in the next 24 hours. Will keep you posted."

An earlier email seemingly shows how the State Department worked to carefully craft Amiri's return to Iran.

Amiri was arrested upon his return and tried for treason. He was initially given a long prison sentence. But something changed recently that prodded the Iranian government to call for his execution.

While US State Department officials apparently burned Amiri by leaking his status as a defector/spy, Clinton's emails made it clear he was returning to Iran to spy for the US. Did that fact seal Amiri's fate?

That the poorly disguised identity of Amiri appeared in a supposedly unclassified email is a major breach of security - especially since the US was arranging his return to Tehran.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/08/did_clinton_emails_doom_iranian_nuke_scientist_to_death.html#ixzz4GgjMVE4s


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 09, 2016, 11:39:31 am
Clinton Body Count or Left-Wing Conspiracy? Three With Ties to DNC Mysteriously Die

Since the Democratic National Committee emails were leaked a few weeks ago, three people associated with the DNC have all been found dead under what could be questionable circumstances. Some — including Bernie Sanders supporters  — suspect the Clintons were behind the deaths, just more episodes in the alleged “Clinton body count” dating back to the 1990s. Others dismiss the speculation as left-wing conspiracy nuts. But until the police have completed their investigations and the medical examiners have released autopsy reports, it is premature to make any determinations.

Seth Rich

DNC staffer Seth Rich was mysteriously murdered in the streets of Washington, D.C., on July 10. Although it is being investigated as a robbery, his wallet, credit cards and watch were not taken. The 27-year old was shot in the back on July 10 at 4:15 a.m. near his affluent neighborhood, while he was reportedly walking home from his girlfriend’s apartment. Police still have no suspects, witnesses or motive. His mother told the local NBC station that there were bruises on his face, knees and hands, apparently from trying to fend off his attackers.

Some are speculating that Hillary Clinton is behind the murder, because Rich could have been the DNC staffer responsible for leaking the 20,000 damaging DNC emails to Wikileaks. The allegation is that powerful Sanders allies convinced Rich to leak the data. He had previously worked on the U.S. Senate campaign for Nebraska businessman Scott Kleeb, who lost his election. The Clinton Global Initiative provided funds for a clean energy business started by Kleeb, which had come under investigation after losing $300,000 in 2010 and another $300,000 in 2011 despite the subsidies. Rich was also previously employed at a data firm that had worked with the Clintons. After news of possible corruption emerged between the Clinton Global Initiative and Kleeb, supposedly that led to Sanders’ cronies pressuring Rich to leak what was going on.

Rich was a data analyst, so it is very possible he could have had access to the DNC’s emails. Julian Assange of Wikileaks said recently on TV that it wasn’t Russian hackers who intercepted the emails, as the Hillary Clinton campaign has alleged; instead, any one of a number of staffers within the DNC could have leaked them.

Emily Zanotti of HeatStreet, who is no leftist, has written a skeptical article about the conspiracy theories surrounding his death, analyzing Reddit threads. Reddit has contributors covering the circumstances of his death extensively, but they aren’t professional journalists, are mostly anonymous and can get things wrong, which hurts the credibility of the speculation.

The myth-debunking site Snopes labeled the suspicion over Rich’s death as false. This is strange, since how does Snopes know that it is false? The police haven’t even completed their investigation yet, which Snopes admits. Many murders go unsolved, including several of the strange deaths of people associated with the Clintons. A $25,000 reward is being offered for information about who killed Rich.

There should be no rush to judgment either way. Two people were robbed at gunpoint within the hour before Rich was murdered, a little over a mile away. If Rich was really the victim of a robbery, why didn’t the robbers take his valuables? It is possible that Rich refused to turn his valuables over, so the robbers shot him, and then fled without the valuables due to the noise from the gunshot. Police investigators will likely speak with the victims of the earlier two robberies and ask if they can recall what the gun looked like to see if the ballistics match the two rounds that killed Rich.

Shawn Lucas

Shawn Lucas, along with filmmaker Ricardo Villaba, served the DNC on July 3 with a complaint and summons in a fraud action on behalf of Sanders supporters. In the video, he can be seen grinning, happy to do it.

On August 2, he was found lying on the bathroom floor dead by his girlfriend when she came home that evening. His girlfriend said he was in good health.

John Ashe

The former President of the United Nations General Assembly, John Ashe, mysteriously passed away on June 22, a few days before he was scheduled to begin pretrial meetings involving shady financial dealings regarding a former Clinton crony. Local police officers said he died from dropping a barbell on his throat while working out, but the UN oddly first claimed he died of a heart attack. The 61-year-old was supposed to testify against Chinese real estate developer Ng Lap Seng, who was implicated in the “Chinagate” scandal for funneling money to the DNC for Bill Clinton through Arkansas restaurant owner Charlie Trie. Ashe was arrested last year for allegedly taking over $3 million in bribes from Chinese businessmen, including over half a million from Ng Lap Se, in exchange for building a United Nations conference center in Macau.

Dominican attorney Henry Shillingford questioned his death, “It is strange for Antigua’s most senior diplomat to be implicated and die under such troubling circumstances.” The New York Post’s Page Six ran a skeptical article questioning the circumstances. A source told the paper, “During the trial, the prosecutors would have linked Ashe to the Clinton bagman Ng. It would have been very embarrassing. His death was conveniently timed.”

However, his widow, Dr Anilla Cherian, said it was the third time that her husband had been found collapsed at their home.

More suspicious deaths recently of people with ties to the Clintons

Victor Thorn, who wrote four books exposing the Clintons, reportedly killed himself with a gun on his 54th birthday, August 1, while on top of a mountain near his Pennsylvania home. The books he wrote were Hillary (And Bill): The Sex Volume, Hillary (And Bill): The Drugs Volume, and Hillary (And Bill): The Murder Volume, and his latest which was published in February, Crowning Clinton: Why Hillary Shouldn't Be in the White House.

According to the Inqisitr, Thorn had appeared multiple times on The Russell Scott Show and told the host, “Russell, if I’m ever found dead, it was murder. I would never kill myself.”

Joe Montano, an aide to Hillary’s running mate Tim Kaine, died of a heart attack on July 25. He had worked for the DNC and was only 47.

A man named Larry Nichols claimed on the Pete Santilli Show that he was hired as a hitman for the Clintons, and killed several people years ago.

What is comes down to is this: how many other politicians have you heard of who have had so many mysterious deaths associated with them? You don’t hear of a Bush body count — not even an Obama body count. Snopes, the left-leaning internet myth debunker, labels the Clinton body count as false. However, the main site that hosts a list of the Clinton body count reports that is constantly under attack by hackers of Hillary’s.

Regardless of whether there is any truth to the Clintons being behind these deaths, at a very minimum, the gun laws in DC need to be changed to allow people to protect themselves. After being robbed while housesitting for a friend, former Washington Post columnist Emily Miller wrote a book about how difficult it was to obtain a gun for self-protection in DC,Emily Gets Her Gun. Fortunately, there is now ongoing litigation challenging these draconian laws. Whether Rich was killed by robbers or someone else, a gun likely would have saved his life.

http://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2016/08/09/clinton-body-count-or-leftwing-conspiracy-three-with-ties-to-dnc-mysteriously-die-n2203000


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 09, 2016, 12:36:01 pm
Psalm 101:4  A froward heart shall depart from me: I will not know a wicked person.


Title: WikiLeaks CONFIRMS Hillary Sold Weapons to ISIS... Then Drops Another BOMBSHELL!
Post by: Mark on August 09, 2016, 07:27:09 pm
WikiLeaks CONFIRMS Hillary Sold Weapons to ISIS... Then Drops Another BOMBSHELL! Breaking News

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is a controversial character. But there’s no denying the emails he has picked up from inside the Democrat Party are real, and he’s willing to expose Hillary Clinton.

Now, he’s announcing that Hillary Clinton and her State Department was actively arming Islamic jihadists, which includes the Islamic State (ISIS) in Syria.

Clinton as repeatedly denied these claims, including during multiple statements while under oath in front of the United States Senate.

WikiLeaks is about to prove Hillary Clinton deserves to be arrested:

    The Reagan administration officials hoped to secure the release of several U.S. hostages, and then take proceeds from the arms sales to Iran, to fund the Contras in Nicaragua.

    Sounds familiar?

    In Obama’s second term, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton authorized the shipment of American-made arms to Qatar, a country beholden to the Muslim Brotherhood, and friendly to the Libyan rebels, in an effort to topple the Libyan/Gaddafi government, and then ship those arms to Syria in order to fund Al Qaeda, and topple Assad in Syria.

    Clinton took the lead role in organizing the so-called “Friends of Syria” (aka Al Qaeda/ISIS) to back the CIA-led insurgency for regime change in Syria.

    Under oath Hillary Clinton denied she knew about the weapons shipments during public testimony in early 2013 after the Benghazi terrorist attack.

    In an interview with Democracy Now, Wikileaks’ Julian Assange is now stating that 1,700 emails contained in the Clinton cache directly connect Hillary to Libya to Syria, and directly to Al Qaeda and ISIS.

via The Duran

Here is the incredible transcript:

    JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Julian, I want to mention something else. In March, you launched a searchable archive for over 30,000 emails and email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton’s private email server while she was secretary of state. The 50,547 pages of documents span the time from June 2010 to August 2014; 7,500 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton herself. The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the U.S. State Department as the result of a Freedom of Information Act request. Why did you do this, and what’s the importance, from your perspective, of being able to create a searchable base?

    JULIAN ASSANGE: Well, WikiLeaks has become the rebel library of Alexandria. It is the single most significant collection of information that doesn’t exist elsewhere, in a searchable, accessible, citable form, about how modern institutions actually behave. And it’s gone on to set people free from prison, where documents have been used in their court cases; hold the CIA accountable for renditions programs; feed into election cycles, which have resulted in the termination of, in some case—or contributed to the termination of governments, in some cases, taken the heads of intelligence agencies, ministers of defense and so on. So, you know, our civilizations can only be as good as our knowledge of what our civilisation is. We can’t possibly hope to reform that which we do not understand.

    So, those Hillary Clinton emails, they connect together with the cables that we have published of Hillary Clinton, creating a rich picture of how Hillary Clinton performs in office, but, more broadly, how the U.S. Department of State operates. So, for example, the disastrous, absolutely disastrous intervention in Libya, the destruction of the Gaddafi government, which led to the occupation of ISIS of large segments of that country, weapons flows going over to Syria, being pushed by Hillary Clinton, into jihadists within Syria, including ISIS, that’s there in those emails. There’s more than 1,700 emails in Hillary Clinton’s collection, that we have released, just about Libya alone.

It appears that Hillary Clinton committed perjury, just like her husband was caught doing as President.

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/wikileaks-confirms-hillary-sold-weapons-isis-drops-another-bombshell-breaking-news/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 09, 2016, 10:16:55 pm
Julian Assange Suggests Seth Rich - Who Was MURDERED in DC - Was Wikileaks DNC Source!
Jim Hoft

Aug 9th, 2016 8:15 pm 892 Comments

On July 8, 2016, 27 year-old Democratic staffer Seth Conrad Rich was murdered in Washington DC. The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone.

Shortly after the killing, Redditors and social media users were pursuing a “lead” saying that Rich was en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to special agents about an “ongoing court case” possibly involving the Clinton family.

Seth Rich’s father Joel told reporters, “If it was a robbery — it failed because he still has his watch, he still has his money — he still has his credit cards, still had his phone so it was a wasted effort except we lost a life.”

The Metropolitan police posted a reward for information on Rich’s murder.

(http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/seth-rich-bloomingdale_02.jpg)

On Tuesday Wikileaks offered a $20,000 reward for information on the murder of DNC staffer Seth rich.

Now this…
Julian Assange suggested on Tuesday that Seth Rich was a Wikileaks informant.
Via Mike Cernovich:

Julian Assange seems to suggests on Dutch television program Nieuwsuur that Seth Rich was the source for the Wikileaks-exposed DNC emails and was murdered.

From the video:

    Julian Assange: Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks. As a 27 year-old, works for the DNC, was shot in the back, murdered just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington.

    Reporter: That was just a robbery, I believe. Wasn’t it?

    Julian Assange: No. There’s no finding. So… I’m suggesting that our sources take risks.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/wow-breaking-video-julian-assange-suggests-seth-rich-wikileaks-dnc-source-shot-dead-dc/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 10, 2016, 07:20:47 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Lbu1VXZIsI


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 15, 2016, 06:11:57 pm
GOP Lawmakers Lay Out Perjury Case Against Clinton

The Republican chairmen of the House Oversight and House Judiciary Committees laid out the case for perjury charges against Hillary Clinton in a letter sent to the U.S. Attorney in Washington, D.C. on Monday.

Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz and Virginia Rep. Bob Goodlatte, the chairs of Oversight and Judiciary, respectively, say that Clinton may have violated 18 U.S.C. § 1621 and § 1001, federal laws which govern perjury and false statements, respectively, during her Oct. 22, 2015 testimony in front of the House Select Committee on Benghazi.

In a letter to U.S. Attorney Channing Phillips, the lawmakers point to four inconsistent statements Clinton made regarding her private email system during that hearing.

Clinton gave false testimony when she said she did not send or receive emails that were marked classified at the time they were originated, when she claimed that her attorneys reviewed all of the emails on her personal email system, when she said that she only operated one server, and when she claimed that she provided all of her work-related emails to the State Department, Chaffetz and Goodlatte argue.

FBI director James Comey undermined those Clinton claims, and others, during two public appearances early last month. While Comey announced on July 5 that the FBI would not seek charges against Clinton for mishandling classified information, he called her use of a private email server “extremely careless.”

[dcquiz] In a hearing in front of Chaffetz’s Oversight Committee two days later, Comey said that Clinton did not lie during her July 2 interrogation with FBI and Justice Department investigators.

But he said he was unable to ascertain whether Clinton perjured herself during the Benghazi hearing. He said that Clinton’s testimony then was not central to their investigation but that he would welcome a referral from Congress to look into the matter further.

“Although there may be other aspects of Secretary Clinton’s sworn testimony that are at odds with the FBI’s findings, her testimony in those four areas bears specific scrutiny in light of the facts and evidence FBI Director James Comey described in his public statement on July 5, 2016 and in testimony before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on July 7, 2016,” reads the Chaffetz/Goodlatte letter.

 The letter comes two weeks after Justice Department attorney Peter Kadzik wrote to Chaffetz and Goodlatte that the agency would look into Clinton’s inconsistent statements to Congress and “take appropriate action as necessary.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/15/gop-lawmakers-lay-out-perjury-case-against-clinton/#ixzz4HRfjVmoG


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 15, 2016, 06:43:32 pm
BOMBSHELL: WIKILEAKS RELEASES NEW EMAILS SHOWING HILLARY TAKING ORDERS FROM GEORGE SOROS

Soros urges the then-Secretary of State to get the international community involved and pressure the Prime Minister to “forestall further demonstrations” and “tone down public pronouncements” as well appointing a senior European official to act as the mediator. The left wing billionaire also gave Clinton a list of potential nominees to appoint as mediator: Carl Bildt, Martti Ahtisaari and Miroslav Lajcak.

MORE LEAKED E-MAILS FROM HILLARY CLINTON’S TIME AS SECRETARY OF STATE PROVE THAT SHE WAS TAKING FOREIGN POLICY ADVICE FROM LEFT-WING BILLIONAIRE ACTIVIST GEORGE SOROS.

EDITOR’S NOTE: George Soros is the puppet master of the New World Order, and he is using his vast wealth to spur Muslim migration in Europe, race wars in America as well as rigging digital voting booths. Now WikiLeaks reveals that he has had Crooked Hillary in his back pocket for quite sometime. To date, she has accepted $25 million in donations from the Soros machine.

An e-mail provided by WikiLeaks showed Soros reaching out to Secretary Clinton over a foreign policy dispute in Albania.

“DEAR HILLARY,

“A SERIOUS SITUATION HAS ARISEN IN ALBANIA WHICH NEEDS URGENT ATTENTION AT SENIOR LEVELS OF THE US GOVERNMENT. YOU MAY KNOW THAT AN OPPOSITION DEMONSTRATION IN TIRANA ON FRIDAY RESULTED IN THE DEATHS OF THREE PEOPLE AND THE DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY.

“THERE ARE SERIOUS CONCERNS ABOUT FURTHER UNREST CONNECTED TO A COUNTER-DEMONSTRATION TO BE ORGANIZED BY THE GOVERNING PARTY ON WEDNESDAY AND A FOLLOW-UP EVENT BY THE OPPOSITION TWO DAYS LATER TO MEMORIALIZE THE VICTIMS.

“THE PROSPECT OF TENS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE ENTERING THE STREETS IN AN ALREADY INFLAMED POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT BODES ILL FOR THE RETURN OF PUBLIC ORDER AND THE COUNTRY’S FRAGILE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS.”

Soros urges the then-Secretary of State to get the international community involved and pressure the Prime Minister to “forestall further demonstrations” and “tone down public pronouncements” as well appointing a senior European official to act as the mediator.

WIKILEAKS PROVIDES THE SMOKING GUN CONNECTION GEORGE SOROS AND CROOKED HILLARY:

(https://nteb-mudflowermedia.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/wikileaks-emails-shows-hillary-clinton-taking-orders-from-george-soros-election-2016-donald-trump.jpg)

The left wing billionaire also gave Clinton a list of potential nominees to appoint as mediator: Carl Bildt, Martti Ahtisaari and Miroslav Lajcak.

CROOKED HILLARY SAYS SHE IS NOT “IN ANYONE’S POCKET’ AFTER TAKING MILLIONS FROM GEORGE SOROS:

Listen as Crooked Hillary’s liberal interviewers actually laugh out loud as she tries to assert that she is “not in anyone’s pocket”.

https://vimeo.com/176473141

The e-mail was sent from Soros’ aide to Richard Verma, then the Assistant Secretary of State for Legislative Affairs who forwarded it to several of Clinton’s top aides including Huma Abedin, Jacob Sullivan, and Philip Gordon. Sullivan forwarded it to Clinton.

Just three days after Clinton received the e-mail from Soros the EU ended up sending Soros’ suggested nominee Lajcak to mediate the civil unrest, the BBC reported. source

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/bombshell-wikileaks-releases-new-email-showing-hillary-clinton-taking-orders-from-george-soros/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 16, 2016, 04:32:04 am
BREAKING=> ANOTHER Mysterious Death: Anti-Clinton Author Found Dead at 54

Jim Hoft Aug 15th, 2016 6:53 pm

Anti Clinton author Scott Robert Makufka, better known as his penname Victor Thorn, was found dead this past week.

Thorn was the author of several anti-Clinton books over the years.

Victor Thorn spoke with Texe Marrs about ‘The Clinton Body-Count’ a few months before being found dead on his birthday, 1st August, apparently from a self inflicted gunshot wound.

The Political Insider reported:

American Free Press contributor Victor Thorn, 54, a long-time researcher and critic of Hillary and Bill Clinton, has been found dead. Police reports indicate he died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

The author of more than 20 books, he was best known for the Clinton trilogy, “three definitive works that delved into the history of the power couple including their sordid scandals, Bill Clinton’s sexual assaults of multiple women, and the drug running out of Mena, Arkansas while Clinton was governor of the state.”

AMERICAN FREE PRESS contacted the State College [Pa.] Police Department this morning for any news on the suicide of Victor Thorn, whose birth name was Scott Robert Makufka.
AFP asked the policeman who answered the phone if the department could provide any updates.

“There was something that occurred on Monday morning, but I don’t know if we’ve released any identities or any details about it at this time.”

AFP asked if he knew when the release might happen.

“I don’t. I don’t know what the status of the investigation is. I have not seen the detective that’s in charge of that today yet. They’ll release it as soon as they can. I don’t know what the holdup is or the details are at this point.”

Thorn’s most recent book is “CROWNING CLINTON: Why Hillary Shouldn’t Be in the White House” and is described as a serious prosecution of Hillary Clinton’s criminal activity.

This comes after the mysterious deaths of several liberal operatives in the past few months.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/breaking-another-mysterious-death-anti-clinton-author-found-dead-54-reported-suicide/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 16, 2016, 09:13:53 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifIAlft47bM


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 19, 2016, 06:56:19 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18LUQTOerWY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZLnQjMsyvc


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 19, 2016, 06:56:53 pm
Just the FBI's Notes on Hillary Clinton's Investigation Require Top Security

FBI documents about the agency's investigation into Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server while secretary of state were being reviewed on Wednesday in secure rooms of the U.S. Capitol.

Lawmakers and select staff from some congressional committees could page through the material, parts of which are redacted, in large binders labeled "secret" that the Federal Bureau of Investigation turned over to Congress on Tuesday.

Republican lawmakers requested the information last month after the FBI recommended no criminal charges against Clinton.

"Last I heard, my colleagues had their turn with the documents at 1:30 p.m.," said a Senate Judiciary committee aide. "There's only one set of documents for all the interested Senate committees, as I understand it."

She said those viewing the material were allowed to take notes. But if notes were taken on the classified parts, those notes had to be left in the secure area with the documents.

Clinton has been dogged for more than a year by questions about her use of a private email account while she was the nation's top diplomat from 2009 to 2013.

Republicans have repeatedly hammered Clinton over the issue, helping to drive opinion poll results showing that many U.S. voters doubt her trustworthiness. She faces Republican nominee Donald Trump in the Nov. 8 election.

The FBI said on Tuesday it had provided "relevant materials" to congressional committees looking into the matter.

"The material contains classified and other sensitive information and is being provided with the expectation it will not be disseminated or disclosed without FBI concurrence," the agency said in a statement.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, a Republican, said in a statement on Tuesday an initial review of the material showed most of it was marked unclassified.

Grassley, who has called for unclassified parts of the documents to be made public, wrote on Wednesday to the Senate Security Office, which has custody of the documents, asking them to provide his committee with an unclassified version.

Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon in a statement also called for the public release of the documents, "rather than allow Republicans to mischaracterize them through selective, partisan leaks."

The documents on the Senate side of the Capitol are under the control of the Office of Senate Security, Senate aides said. In the House of Representatives, another set was being viewed in a "Secure Compartmented Information Facility," an aide with the House Oversight and Government Reform committee said.

"Our investigators with (security) clearances have gone down there and looked at the documents," the Oversight committee aide said.

It was unclear how many lawmakers had actually seen the material so far. Most members of Congress were not in town because of a congressional recess.

The documents were made available to the Judiciary, Homeland Security, and Appropriations committees in the Senate, and the Oversight, Judiciary and Appropriations committees in the House, aides said.

The Intelligence committees on both sides of the Capitol also have copies, so they do not have to join the line with the others.

http://www.charismanews.com/politics/elections/59373-just-the-fbi-s-notes-on-hillary-clinton-s-investigation-require-top-security


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 24, 2016, 07:04:51 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjUVPwE2ENo


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 24, 2016, 09:06:45 pm
This really happened, and people believe it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ArMldSapbM


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 25, 2016, 05:36:22 pm
Clinton Foundation scandal 'bigger than Watergate

Giuliani: 'Nixon did a lot of bad things, but it wasn't raking in millions and millions of dollars through phony charity' New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani is forecasting it will end up being one of the biggest political scandals in America. the Clintons have been getting and turning the State Department into a pay-for-play operation.” 

http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/clinton-foundation-scandal-bigger-than-watergate/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 25, 2016, 06:42:55 pm
GONE! FBI FILES CONNECTING HILLARY CLINTON TO ‘SUICIDE’ DEATH OF VINCE FOSTER SUDDENLY DISAPPEAR
'He examined all eight boxes but found no interviews by any investigator that detail either a meeting between Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster or the effects of a meeting between Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster on Vince Foster's state of mind,' Murphy reported in an email.


DOCUMENTS DESCRIBING HILLARY CLINTON’S ROLE IN THE DEATH OF WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL VINCE FOSTER HAVE VANISHED

EDITOR’S NOTE: Vince Foster was killed back in 1993, and all signs point to Bill and Hillary Clinton as the cause of his death. In 2016, as Hillary has become the Democrat nominee for president, all FBI records related to the investigation of Foster’s death have officially “disappeared”. Now who do you suppose would have done that? Hmm. The Clinton Body Count rolls on.

FBI agents’ reports of interviews documenting that Hillary Clinton’s stinging humiliation of her friend and mentor Vince Foster in front of White House aides triggered his suicide a week later are missing from the National Archives, Daily Mail Online has learned exclusively.

On two separate occasions, this author visited the National Archives and Records Service in College Park, Md., to review the reports generated by FBI agents assigned to investigate the 1993 death of Bill Clinton’s deputy White House counsel.

On the first visit, archivist David Paynter provided the box of records that he said contained the FBI reports of interviews conducted by FBI agents on Foster’s death.  On a second visit, archivist James Mathis provided what he said were those same documents.

THE STRANGE DEATH OF VINCE FOSTER EXPLAINED:

https://youtu.be/4QdrG4qb3sk

While the box contained dozens of FBI reports concerning Foster’s death – including interviews with the medical examiner, U.S. Park Police officers, and White House aides about the contents of Foster’s office –  the reports on Hillary Clinton’s role in his death were absent.

After filing a Freedom of Information request with the National Archives, Martha Murphy, the archives’ public liaison, reported that she directed a senior archivist to conduct a more thorough review of the relevant FBI files, including those that had not been previously made public in response to FOIA requests.

‘He examined all eight boxes but found no interviews by any investigator that detail either a meeting between Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster or the effects of a meeting between Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster on Vince Foster’s state of mind,’ Murphy reported in an email.

‘We did not limit ourselves to interviews by the two individuals [FBI agents] you mention.’

THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE CLINTONS HAVE VANISHED FROM THE NATIONAL ARCHIVE.

In March 2009, the archives found that an external hard drive from the Bill Clinton White House containing confidential documents was missing. When it could not be located, the inspector general’s office announced that it had opened a criminal investigation.

Offering a reward of up to $50,000 for information leading to recovery of the hard drive, the archives asked that tips be reported to the Secret Service. At the time, the archives said it had a backup drive.

But in the case of the FBI’s interviews about Vince Foster suicide, there appear to be no backups. The archives had no immediate comment on the missing Vince Foster files. The FBI investigation into Foster’s death was conducted for independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr’s probe of the Clintons’ investments in the Whitewater real estate development.

For unknown reasons, Starr elected to conceal the FBI’s findings in his final report.

But in interviews for my book The First Family Detail: Secret Service Agents Reveal the Hidden Lives of the Presidents, the FBI agents revealed the truth about Foster’s death on July 20, 1993 when he shot himself at Fort Marcy Park along the Potomac River.

https://youtu.be/CSU31K6kD14

In interviewing Clinton White House aides and Foster’s friends and family, the FBI found that a week before Foster’s death, Hillary held a meeting at the White House with Foster and other top aides to discuss her proposed health care legislation.

Hillary angrily disagreed with a legal objection Foster raised at the meeting and ridiculed him in front of his peers, former FBI agent Coy Copeland and former FBI supervisory agent Jim Clemente told me. Copeland was Starr’s senior investigator and read the reports of other agents working for Starr.

DURING THE WHITE HOUSE MEETING, HILLARY CONTINUED TO HUMILIATE FOSTER MERCILESSLY, ACCORDING TO BOTH FORMER FBI AGENTS

‘Hillary put him down really, really bad in a pretty good-size meeting,’ Copeland says. ‘She told him he didn’t get the picture, and he would always be a little hick town lawyer who was obviously not ready for the big time.’

Indeed, Hillary went so far as to blame Foster for all the Clintons’ problems and to accuse him of failing them, according to Clemente, who was also assigned by the FBI to the Starr investigation and who probed the circumstances surrounding Foster’s suicide.

That weekend, Foster and his wife drove to the Eastern Shore of Maryland, where they saw their friends, Michael Cardoza and Webster Hubbell, and their wives.

‘They played tennis, they swam, and they said he sat in a lawn chair, just kind of sat there in the lawn chair,’ Copeland says. ‘They said that just was not Vince. He loved to play tennis, and he was always sociable, but he just sat over in the corner by himself and stared off into space, reading a book.’

Two days later, Foster left the White House parking lot at 1:10 p.m. The precise time when he shot himself could not be pinpointed. After Park Police found his body, they notified the U.S. Secret Service at 8:30 p.m.

THE CLINTON BODY COUNT CONSPIRACY:

https://youtu.be/OgZI49J_tF0

Based on what ‘dozens’ of others who had contact with Foster after that meeting told the agents, while Foster was already depressed, ‘The put-down that she gave him in that big meeting just pushed him over the edge,’ Copeland says. ‘It was the final straw that broke the camel’s back.’

‘Foster was profoundly depressed, but Hillary lambasting him was the final straw because she publicly embarrassed him in front of others,’ says Clemente.

‘Hillary blamed him for failed nominations, claimed he had not vetted them properly, and said in front of his White House colleagues, ‘You’re not protecting us’ and ‘You have failed us,’ Clemente says. ‘That was the final blow.’

After the White House meeting, Foster’s behavior changed dramatically, the FBI agents found. Those who knew him said his voice sounded strained, he became withdrawn and preoccupied, and his sense of humor vanished. At times, Foster teared up. He talked of feeling trapped.

On Tuesday, July 13, 1993, while having dinner with his wife Lisa, Foster broke down and began to cry. He said he was considering resigning.

No one can explain a suicide in rational terms. But the FBI investigation concluded that it was Hillary’s vilification of Foster in front of other White House aides, coming on top of his depression, that triggered his suicide about a week later, Copeland and Clemente both say.

Starr issued a 38,000-word report, along with a separate psychologist’s report on the factors that contributed to Foster’s suicide. Yet Starr never mentioned the meeting with Hillary, leaving out the fact that his own investigation had found that Hillary’s rage had led to her friend’s suicide.

Why Starr chose not to reveal the critical meeting and his own investigators’ findings remains a mystery. Asked why he excluded what led to Foster’s suicide from his report, Starr did not respond. A spokesman for Hillary Clinton had no comment.

Starr’s report recounted how the FBI ran down even the most bizarre theories about Foster’s death and conducted extensive ballistics tests that refuted assertions that Foster had not committed suicide. source

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/gone-fbi-files-connecting-hillary-clinton-suicide-death-vince-foster-suddenly-disappear/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 25, 2016, 06:44:34 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVqXLX1fFvQ

 :o


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 25, 2016, 07:29:16 pm
This is just my perception - but from recent sermons I've been listening to (from good preachers, that is), I believe this country will finally be given over to Jezebel. It's as if we're starting to see prophesy come to come. And we read the account of it during Elijah's time.

The spirit of Jezebel is the worst not in the lost world, or even in these lukewarm, liberal "Protestant" churches - but deep in these (supposedly) IFB, KJB-only churches - where families will show an outward appearance of having godliness and holiness on Sundays, but after that, it's all back to the "normal world" for them the rest of the 6 days a week. Ultimately, their children have grown up witnessing all of this hypocrisy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FU4jn3x1Fgw


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 25, 2016, 11:07:43 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufkHt8dgG8I


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 26, 2016, 04:52:56 am
HILLARY SLAMS ‘KKK’ TRUMP BUT HER “FRIEND AND MENTOR” WAS KKK LEADER ROBERT BYRD
Clinton praised man who once called black people "mongrels"


Hillary Clinton’s new campaign strategy is to claim that Donald Trump is the candidate of the KKK, conveniently leaving out the fact that Hillary herself described Robert Byrd – a KKK leader who once called black people “mongrels,” as her “friend and mentor”.

Earlier today, the Clinton campaign released a video which “makes the case that Donald Trump is the candidate of racists, white supremacists and neo-Nazis.”

“The reason a lot of Klan members like Donald Trump is because a lot of what he believes, we believe in,” says a robed KKK Imperial Wizard in the clip.

Hillary is also set to give a speech today in which she will attack the Trump-supporting “Alt-Right” by demonizing it as racist and misogynistic.

However, Hillary’s attempt to denounce Trump by linking him with the KKK is laced with hypocrisy because Hillary herself called once praised ex-KKK kingpin Robert Byrd as her “friend and mentor”.

Byrd became the leader of a KKK chapter when he was 24-years-old because he didn’t want to fight alongside “race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds,” during World War II.

“I shall never fight in the armed forces with a negro by my side,” vowed Byrd in a 1944 letter to Sen. Theodore Bilbo (D-MS).

Byrd subsequently wrote another letter in 1946 in which he asserted that, “The Klan is needed today as never before, and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia and in every state in the nation.”

https://youtu.be/ryweuBVJMEA

Bill Clinton later justified Byrd’s KKK history by saying he was just “trying to get elected”.

After his death in 2010, Clinton gave a glowing eulogy to Byrd in a video that was uploaded to the State Department’s official YouTube page.

“Today our country has lost a true American original, my friend and mentor Robert C. Byrd,” said Clinton, praising the Senator as “a man of surpassing eloquence and nobility.”

“From my first day in the Senate, I sought out his guidance, and he was always generous with his time and his wisdom. I admired his tireless advocacy for his West Virginia constituents, his fierce defense of the Constitution and the traditions of the Senate, and his passion for a government that improves the lives of the people it serves,” added Clinton.

She said that she would “continue to rely on (Byrd’s) advice and counsel” even after his death.

While the pro-Clinton media will hound Trump over him being endorsed by the likes of David Duke and KKK members, when Hillary was endorsed by the pro-Taliban father of Pulse nightclub terrorist Omar Mateen, she was given a free pass.

Hillary’s KKK demonization of Trump today will also be slavishly parroted by the press with no mention whatsoever of Clinton’s deep personal ties to Robert Byrd – a once vehemently racist KKK leader.

http://www.infowars.com/hillary-slams-kkk-trump-but-her-friend-and-mentor-was-kkk-member-robert-byrd/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 28, 2016, 07:53:23 am
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/us-clinton-calendars-wont-be-released-until-after-election/ar-BBw6veN?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
US: Clinton calendars won't be released until after election
 

8/27/16

WASHINGTON — Seven months after a federal judge ordered the State Department to begin releasing monthly batches of the detailed daily schedules showing meetings by Hillary Clinton during her time as secretary of state, the government told The Associated Press it won't finish the job before Election Day.

The department has so far released about half of the schedules. Its lawyers said in a phone conference with the AP's lawyers that the department now expects to release the last of the detailed schedules around Dec. 30, weeks before the next president is inaugurated.

The AP's lawyers late Friday formally asked the State Department to hasten that effort so that the department could provide all Clinton's minute-by-minute schedules by Oct. 15. The agency did not immediately respond.

The schedules drew new attention this week after the AP analyzed the ones released so far. The news agency found that more than half the people outside the government who met or spoke by telephone with Clinton while she was secretary of state had given money — either personally or through companies or groups — to the Clinton Foundation. The AP's analysis focused on people with private interests and excluded her meetings or calls with U.S. federal employees or foreign government representatives.

The AP's reporting was based on official calendars covering Clinton's entire term plus the more-detailed daily schedules covering roughly half her time as secretary of state. The AP first asked for Clinton's calendars in 2010 and again in 2013. It then sued the State Department in federal court to obtain the detailed schedules, and the department so far has provided about half of them under court order.

Clinton has said the AP's analysis was flawed because it did not account fully for all meetings and phone calls during her entire term as secretary. She also said the analysis should have included meetings with federal employees and foreign diplomats. The AP said it focused on her meetings with outsiders because those were more discretionary, as Clinton would normally meet with federal officials and foreign officials as part of her job.

Clinton said she met with people outside government regardless of whether they gave money or charitable commitments to her family's charity.

more


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 29, 2016, 08:34:18 pm
FBI Admits Clinton Used Software Designed To 'Prevent Recovery' And 'Hide Traces Of' Deleted Emails

South Carolina Representative Trey Gowdy appeared on Fox News today and disclosed new details about the Clinton email scandal that seem to indicate intent to destroy evidence. Per the clip below, Gowdy reveals that Clinton used "BleachBit" to erase the "personal" emails from her private server.  For those not familiar with the software, BleachBit is intended to help users delete files in a way to "prevent recovery" and "hide traces of files deleted."...

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-25/fbi-admits-clinton-used-software-designed-prevent-recovery-and-hide-traces-deleted-e


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 30, 2016, 05:28:17 pm
Surprise: FBI Recovers Another 30 Benghazi Emails Hillary Clinton Deleted

The FBI has recovered additional emails former Secretary of State and Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton deleted and by default, refused to turn over to the State Department. From AP:

The State Department says about 30 emails involving the 2012 attack on U.S. compounds in Benghazi, Libya, are among the thousands of Hillary Clinton emails recovered during the FBI’s recently closed investigation into her use of a private server.

Government lawyers told U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta Tuesday that an undetermined number of the emails among the 30 were not included in the 55,000 pages previously provided by Clinton to the State Department. The agency said it would need until the end of September to review the emails and redact potentially classified information before they are released.

The hearing was held in one of several lawsuits filed by the conservative legal group Judicial Watch, which has sued over access to government records involving the Democratic presidential nominee.

Last week we learned the FBI discovered 15,000 more emails Clinton did not turn over during the course of the Bureau's criminal investigation of her private server. Clinton has claimed multiple times she turned over all "work related" emails to the State Department. She had not. Clinton also deleted 30,000 emails she deemed "personal."

"I provided all of my emails that could possibly be work related," Clinton said on March 10, 2015.

Meanwhile, Judicial Watch has officially submitted court mandated questions to Clinton about her private email server, which she must answer under oath, in written form. The answers are due on September 29.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/08/30/fbi-recovers-another-30-benghazi-emails-clinton-didnt-turn-over-n2211978?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad=


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 01, 2016, 01:07:12 pm
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/rigged-clinton-foundation-member-matt-lauer-moderate-first-trump-clinton-debate/

IT’S RIGGED: Clinton Foundation Past Member Matt Lauer To Moderate First Trump-Clinton Forum

It will be one-hour forum where Clinton and Trump will answer questions about national security, military affairs and veterans issues in front of an audience mainly made up of members of the military. It’s worth noting that Matt Lauer is listed as a “notable past member” on the Clinton Global Initiative’s website — along with Anderson Cooper and Katie Couric.

9/1/16

Matt Lauer will moderate the first forum between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Donald Trump is not only going to have to do battle with Hillary Clinton during the upcoming forum, he is also going to have to battle with every, single outlet of the liberal main stream media. He will also have to fight turncoat RINO’S as well. They will come at him as a united, unrelenting force fighting for a Hillary win-at-any-cost campaign. A Trump victory against those odds will be proof of God’s hand in deciding the outcome.

“Daniel answered and said, Blessed be the name of God for ever and ever: for wisdom and might are his: And he changeth the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings: he giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding:” Daniel 2:20,12 (KJV)

On Wednesday, Sept. 7, NBC News and MSNBC — along with the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America — will host the “The Commander-in-Chief Forum” in New York City.

It will be one-hour forum where Clinton and Trump will answer questions about national security, military affairs and veterans issues in front of an audience mainly made up of members of the military. The two candidates will not be on the stage at the same time, but will instead go back to back.

It’s worth noting that Lauer is listed as a “notable past member” on the Clinton Global Initiative’s website — along with Anderson Cooper and Katie Couric.

In the past, a Clinton Foundation official has said that the journalists who are part of the foundation were never asked to pay the $20,000 member fee.

“In fact, in 2012, we reclassified members of the media who participate as ‘guests’ rather than ‘members’ to acknowledge this distinction,” the official has said. source


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on September 03, 2016, 04:25:46 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96PePGyWA-4


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on September 04, 2016, 12:30:43 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SZqiXDfHnI


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on September 06, 2016, 05:24:29 pm
MSNBC Cuts Live Coverage As Hillary Has "One Of The Worst Coughing Fits Ever" - Blames 'Seasonal Allergies'

Unfortunately for Hillary, her earlier coughing fit was not a lone wolf attack. Right in the middle of her "Russia-Trump Conspiracy" lecture to reporters aboard her plan, she was forced to cut short her story by another "seasonal allergy" attack (odd aboard was is likely a heavily filtered air cabin), retreating to the safety of the front seats withe the reappearance of her African American 'handler' once again. Upon her return she explained that "we went back and checked and this happens to me every Labor day." Which seems odd... one assumes that any ill-timed meeting of world-leaders will have to take place in a hermetically-sealed room from now on... 

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-05/hillary-just-had-one-worst-coughing-fits-ever-msnbc-cuts-away


Clinton Turned Away High-Level Chinese Defector to Assist Beijing Leaders

Hillary Clinton turned away a high-ranking Chinese defector who sought political asylum after the communist police chief sought refuge in a U.S. consulate in southwestern China four years ago. Critics say Clinton’s handling of the defection of Wang Lijun, a close aide to a regional Communist Party leader, was a blunder and lost opportunity for U.S. intelligence to gain secrets about the leaders of America’s emerging Asian adversary. 

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/clinton-turned-away-high-level-chinese-defector-assist-beijing-leaders/


Hillary Has Second Coughing Spell of Day During In-Flight Presser Read more: Hillary Has Second Coughing Spell of Day During In-Flight Presser


It was the second time Monday that Clinton had a coughing spell, having coughed her way through two minutes of a campaign speech in Cleveland earlier. But the cough has been a point of speculation among some of Clinton's critics who say it points to evidence she is in poor health. 

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/clinton-health-campaign-election/2016/09/05/id/746757/?ns_mail_uid=612513&ns_mail_job=1685307_09062016&s=al&dkt_nbr=7efnfjpa


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on September 06, 2016, 08:40:44 pm
Wow! Hillary’s Mysterious Handler Pops Up on Plane During Coughing Fit

Hillary Clinton’s mysterious handler disappeared in mid-August.

In recent bizarre events on the campaign trail a strange man was noticed at Hillary Clinton’s side.
Via Mike Cernovich:

** Danger and Play has much more.

The man is dressed like a secret service agent but his actions prove otherwise.
In a recent campaign stop in a Union Hall in front of a sparse crowd, at about the time when some liberal protesters began to protest, Hillary Clinton suddenly froze. She looked dazed and lost.  Seeing this, a group of men rushed to assist the candidate on the stage.  One man however gently pats the candidate’s back and then says, “Keep Talking.”

An expert on Secret Service tactics told TGP Secret Service agents would not touch a candidate in the manner that this individual did and especially Hillary Clinton.  It has been widely reported on Hillary’s disdain for the agents who work to protect her. The man who touches Hillary may be a member of Hillary’s close staff – but he is NOT a Secret Service agent.

Mike Cernovich pointed out earlier that Hillary’s handler carries what looks like a Diazepam pen.

Hillary’s mysterious handler disappeared from the campaign trail in mid-August after several reports were written about his strange appearances on the campaign trail.

Hillary also cut down on her appearances at the same time.

On Monday Hillary Clinton suffered another severe coughing spat on her plane and later during a speech in Cleveland.

Guess who popped up on the plane?

(http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/doctor-hillary-handler-575x346.jpg)

Do you think the media will ever ask the campaign about this guy?

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/09/wow-hillarys-mysterious-handler-pops-plane-coughing-fit/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 07, 2016, 07:42:28 am
FYI, Dallas Morning News endorsed Hillary today - this is pretty significant, b/c the newspapers in DFW hasn't endorsed a Democrat in 75 years.

I know both political "parties" are controlled opposition, but nonetheless everything is just BACK-WARDS nowdays - what's up, is down, what's west, is east, what's never been in the bible, is all of a sudden in the bible...I could go on and on. I'm telling you, it's just CRAZY now!


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 07, 2016, 11:41:22 am
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/dallas-morning-news-endorses-dem-candidate-for-first-time-since-wwii/ar-AAiBgza?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
Dallas Morning News Endorses Dem Candidate For First Time Since WWII
9/7/16

Just one day after issuing a blistering editorial against Donald Trump, the Dallas Morning News came out with an endorsement of Hillary Clinton, calling her the “one serious candidate on the presidential ballot.”

The endorsement marks the first time since World War II that the conservative-leaning newspaper has backed a Democratic candidate for commander in chief.

“Unlike Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton has experience in actual governance, a record of service and a willingness to delve into real policy,” the editorial board wrote.

“Resume vs. resume, judgment vs. judgment, this election is no contest,” they concluded.

The Morning News applauded Clinton’s record of bipartisan cooperation as a senator from New York and the foreign policy experience she gleaned as secretary of state. Legitimate questions about her use of a personal email server at the State Department and reluctance to host press conferences have been transformed into a web of "conspiracies and cover-ups" by her detractors, the newspaper said.

"We reject the politics of personal destruction," they wrote. "Clinton has made mistakes and displayed bad judgment, but her errors are plainly in a different universe than her opponent's."

Trump, the editorial board claimed, has played to voters’ xenophobia and racism, shifted on critical issues, and displayed “a dangerous lack of judgment and impulse control” with his “improvisational insults and midnight tweets.”

“Hillary Clinton has spent years in the trenches doing the hard work needed to prepare herself to lead our nation,” the board wrote. “In this race, at this time, she deserves your vote.”


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on September 07, 2016, 08:46:57 pm
'I never trusted a polygraph again': Hillary Clinton LAUGHS in 30-year-old interview as she recalls how she helped a suspected child rapist walk free after the prosecution lost crucial evidence

    Hillary Clinton defended Thomas Alfred Taylor, 41, in 1975 in Fayettville, Arkansas
    Then aged 27, Clinton found a loophole in the prosecution case and Taylor walked free
    Newly unearthed audio interview from the early 1980s has Clinton discussing the case with Arkansas journalist
    Recordings throw into question Clinton's claim to be a champion of women and children's causes
    Taylor died in 1992 and his alleged victim is now a drug addict still in Fayettville, Arkansas

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2f13f2awK4

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2658801/I-never-trusted-polygraph-Hillary-Clinton-LAUGHS-recalls-helped-suspected-child-rapist-walk-free-prosecution-lost-crucial-evidence.html#ixzz4JcndNN4y



Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on September 12, 2016, 03:37:40 am
CLINTON 'FAINTS' AS SHE IS RUSHED OUT OF 9/11 MEMORIAL...
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/12/us/politics/hillary-clinton-campaign.html


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11-EAzsGxgQ

STRUGGLES TO WALK...
Knees buckle, loses shoe...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/11/hillary-clinton-has-medical-episode-at-911-ceremony-source-says.html

WASH POST: HEALTH NOW AN ISSUE...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/11/hillary-clintons-health-just-became-a-real-issue-in-the-presidential-campaign/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on September 12, 2016, 03:42:00 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uq7yHddozqg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHrXPihlzeE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VnNzZQG2Tc


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 12, 2016, 11:24:44 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGAj2wadGow


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 12, 2016, 03:42:36 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvrnU1yjr-M


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 12, 2016, 03:49:46 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8ewvSFsb3E


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 12, 2016, 04:38:43 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLQ3Fl0cnuo


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on September 12, 2016, 06:55:29 pm
SICK HILLARY COVERUP IS IMPLODING Dr. Ted Noel examines the facts of Hillary’s critical and debilitating medical crisis
http://www.infowars.com/hillary-clinton-has-parkinsons-disease-doctor-says/


When Hillary collapsed this weekend so did her credibility. Her inability to just be straight with America is what's truly Deplorable
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3785474/PIERS-MORGAN-Hillary-collapsed-weekend-did-credibility-inability-just-straight-America-s-truly-Deplorable.html


Is Hillary Preparing To Drop Out Of The Race? 'Chaos Could Ensue If Vacancy Emerges Near Election Day'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3785474/PIERS-MORGAN-Hillary-collapsed-weekend-did-credibility-inability-just-straight-America-s-truly-Deplorable.html


BREAKING: Democrats Close to Replacing Hillary Clinton-Emergency Meeting to be Held-Who Will Be Their Choice?
http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/09/11/breaking-democrats-hold-emergency-meeting-consider-replacing-hillary-clinton/




Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 12, 2016, 08:17:19 pm
SICK HILLARY COVERUP IS IMPLODING Dr. Ted Noel examines the facts of Hillary’s critical and debilitating medical crisis
http://www.infowars.com/hillary-clinton-has-parkinsons-disease-doctor-says/


When Hillary collapsed this weekend so did her credibility. Her inability to just be straight with America is what's truly Deplorable
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3785474/PIERS-MORGAN-Hillary-collapsed-weekend-did-credibility-inability-just-straight-America-s-truly-Deplorable.html


Is Hillary Preparing To Drop Out Of The Race? 'Chaos Could Ensue If Vacancy Emerges Near Election Day'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3785474/PIERS-MORGAN-Hillary-collapsed-weekend-did-credibility-inability-just-straight-America-s-truly-Deplorable.html


BREAKING: Democrats Close to Replacing Hillary Clinton-Emergency Meeting to be Held-Who Will Be Their Choice?
http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/09/11/breaking-democrats-hold-emergency-meeting-consider-replacing-hillary-clinton/




Or it could come down to this - Obama could be ordered to suspend the elections, stay in office for another 4 years, and subsequently might even suspend the Constitution. They said the same thing would happen if Trump got assassinated.


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 12, 2016, 10:59:58 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6xongYDk8c


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on September 14, 2016, 05:32:30 pm
Colin Powell Urged Hillary Clinton’s Team Not to Scapegoat Him for Her Private Server, Leaked Emails Reveal

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell attempted to discourage Hillary Clinton and her team from using him as a scapegoat for her private email server problems, according to newly leaked emails from Powell’s Gmail account. 
https://theintercept.com/2016/09/13/colin-powell-emails/


Techies Instructed to Delete Hillary's Emails: This Looks Like Covering Up A Lot of Shady Sh*t

During a House Oversight Committee hearing Tuesday examining the destruction and deletion of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's email archives, Republican Congressman Jim Jordan pulled up an email sent between Platte River Networks employees expressing concern they were being used as part of a cover-up. "Starting to think this whole thing is really covering up a lot of shady sh*t," an email sent by either Platte River employee Paul Combetta or Bill Thornton stated on August 15, 2015. 
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/09/13/company-employees-asked-to-delete-clintons-emails-this-is-going-to-look-like-some-shady-s-n2217313?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad=




Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 23, 2016, 08:35:24 pm
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/most-clinton-emails-to-be-released-after-election-wsj/ar-BBwytYj?OCID=ansmsnnews11
Most Clinton emails to be released after election: WSJ
9/23/16

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Most of the emails the FBI recovered during its investigation of Hillary Clinton's use of a private email system while secretary of state will not be made available until after the Nov. 8 presidential election under a timetable set by a judge on Friday, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The judge ordered the U.S. State Department to finish processing 1,050 pages of material for release by Nov. 4, just days before Americans go to the polls, the Wall Street Journal said. The paper said that material was out of what could be as much as 10,000 pages.

Under the schedule set by the judge, there will be also be pre-election releases on Oct. 7 and Oct. 21, and the State Department will process 500 pages per month after that, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The State Department is responding to dozens of lawsuits brought over Clinton's use of a private, home-based email system while she was the agency's top diplomat from 2009 to 2013.

The timetable announced on Friday was in a lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch, a conservative group that has filed multiple lawsuits to obtain government records related to Clinton's tenure as secretary of state.

"The State Department voluntarily agreed to produce to Judicial Watch any emails sent or received by Secretary Clinton in her official capacity during her tenure as Secretary of State which are contained within the material turned over by the FBI," agency spokesman John Kirby said in a statement.


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on October 04, 2016, 12:19:24 am
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ct1wSv6WEAAtX6X.jpg:large)

Hillary Clinton on Assange "Can't we just drone this guy"  -- report

https://twitter.com/wikileaks


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on October 05, 2016, 04:56:17 pm
FBI, DOJ Make Side Deal To Destroy Clinton Aides’ Laptops

Sources from the House Judiciary Committee told Fox News Monday that the immunity deals struck with Hillary Clinton’s top aides, Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, included the Justice Department agreeing to destroy their laptops after they had been turned over to federal investigators. 

http://www.westernjournalism.com/fbi-doj-make-side-deal-to-destroy-clinton-aides-laptops/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on October 06, 2016, 05:52:29 pm
Clinton Sought Pentagon, State Department Contracts for Chelsea’s Friend

Hillary Clinton sought to arrange Pentagon and State Department consulting contracts for her daughter’s friend, prompting concerns of federal ethics rules violations. 

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/clinton-sought-pentagon-state-department-contracts-chelseas-friend/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on October 10, 2016, 09:33:52 pm
Hillary In Leaked Email: Saudi Arabia And Qatar Are Funding ISIS

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton sent an email to her campaign chairman John Podesta in 2014, who was then-counselor to President Barack Obama, that said Saudi Arabia and Qatar are both giving financial and logistical support to the Islamic State and other extremist Sunni groups, according to a recent Wikileaks release.

Clinton sent the email on August 17, 2014 to Podesta. It was an eight-point plan to defeat ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Clinton’s email said that the United States should support Kurdish forces on the ground with U.S. military advisers and avoid the use of a conventional military ground operation.

“While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region,” Clinton wrote.

The former secretary of state added: “This effort will be enhanced by the stepped up commitment in the [Kurdish Regional Government]. The Qataris and Saudis will be put in a position of balancing policy between their ongoing competition to dominate the Sunni world and the consequences of serious U.S. pressure.”

The email from Clinton to Podesta contains a similar format of previous intelligence reports Clinton ally Sidney Blumenthal would send to the former secretary of state. The Daily Caller has previously reported how Clinton had previously asked aides to remove markings showing Blumenthal wrote the reports before sending them to White House officials.

The August 2014 email that pointed the finger at Saudi Arabia and Qatar does not contain any information linking it to Blumenthal in particular and is sent from one of Clinton’s personal emails. The batch of Wikileaks emails has not been independently verified by TheDC, however, Clinton at the debate and her spokesman Brian Fallon after the debate did not dispute the legitimacy of leaked speech transcripts released by Wikileaks.

TheDC reached out to the Clinton campaign and asked if they dispute the legitimacy of the email, but they have not responded. The Daily Caller also emailed Blumenthal asking if he authored the memo, and he also did not respond.

Qatar has given between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation and Saudi Arabia has donated upwards of $25 million dollars to the Foundation.

The Clinton campaign has not replied to a Daily Caller inquiry about whether the Clinton Foundation will return donations from these two nations that, according to Hillary Clinton, fund ISIS.

In 2010, Clinton’s top aide said that the up to $60 billion weapons transfer of fighter jets and helicopters to Saudi Arabia was a “top priority.” The Clinton campaign did not give comment when The Daily Caller asked if Hillary was elected would she cede military support to Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/10/hillary-in-leaked-email-saudi-arabia-and-qatar-are-funding-isis/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on October 12, 2016, 10:53:39 pm
Top 10 Clinton scandals exposed by WikiLeaks

The ongoing WikiLeaks dump of Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails has exposed the corruption and cronyism of her campaign and time in office. Everyday there are more revelations of wrongdoing, so much so, it’s hard to keep up with. So here’s the top 10 double-dealing, dishonest discoveries uncovered thus far.

1. Mrs. Clinton had cozy and improper relationship with the mainstream media.

CNN contributor and then adviser of the Democratic National Committee Donna Brazile gave the Clinton campaign advanced notice of a CNN town hall question that she thought may give Mrs. Clinton pause. Mrs. Clinton’s campaign lauded a New York Times reporter for “teeing up” stories for them, and ABC’s George Stephanopoulos for hammering home their talking points. The Boston Globe helped Mrs. Clinton’s team maximize her presence in New England during the primaries and CNBC’s John Harwood bragged to them about dogging Donald Trump during a Republican primary debate he moderated.

2. The State Department paid special attention to “Friends of Bill.”

After the massive 2010 Haiti earthquake, a senior aide to then-Secretary of State Clinton repeatedly gave special attention to those identified by the abbreviations “FOB” (Friends of Bill) or “WJC VIPs” (William Jefferson Clinton VIPs), referring to the former president. The emails show Mrs. Clinton’s State Department prioritized and benefited Mr. Clinton’s friends in the $10 billion recovery effort. The State Department also polled the popularity of Mr. Clinton in Haiti and shared the results with him.

3. Mrs. Clinton argued for “a hemispheric common market with open trade and open borders.”

Mrs. Clinton’s dream for America looks a lot like the European Union. She reportedly told investors in a paid speech to Brazilian Banco Itau in 2013: “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, sometime in the future with energy that’s as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.” Without borders, there are no countries, including the United States.

4. The Clinton campaign was in touch with Department of Justice officials regarding the release of her emails.


Brian Fallon, Mrs. Clinton’s spokesman and former Justice Department staffer, appeared to have discussions with sources inside the DOJ about ongoing open records lawsuits requesting access to her emails while serving as secretary of state. In an email from May 2015, Mr. Fallon said that “DOJ folks” had “informed” him about the upcoming status conference in one of the lawsuits.

5. The Clinton camp was tipped off to the release of the Benghazi emails.

In April 2015, Clinton campaign Deputy Communications Director Kristina Schake referred to a “tip” from a source regarding when the State Department planned to release Mrs. Clinton’s Benghazi emails. Mrs. Clinton’s lawyer Heather Samuelson followed up on the tip, writing: “Latest: Still aiming for Friday, but potential it gets delayed until early next week because still moving through interagency review process. Will check back tomorrow and keep you posted. Quick update on this — DOS says the release of the 300 will likely happen on Thurs or Friday. Will keep you posted as I hear anything further on my end. Thx.”

6. Mrs. Clinton admitted sometimes her public and private positions differ.

In a 2013 speech before the National Multi-Housing Council, Mrs. Clinton indicated her public positions may differ with her private positions, because politics is an ugly business.
“Politics is like sausage being made,” Mrs. Clinton said. “It is unsavory, and it always has been that way, but we usually end up where we need to be. But if everybody’s watching, you know, all of the backroom discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least. So, you need both a public and a private position.”

7. Mrs. Clinton’s spokesman mocked Catholics and evangelicals as “severely backwards.”

Hacked emails show Mrs. Clinton’s campaign spokeswoman Jennifer Palmieri and other Clinton allies openly talking about Catholics being “severely backwards” and charging that they don’t know “what the hell they’re talking about.” The April 2011 discussion between Ms. Palmieri and John Halpin, a senior fellow at the liberal Center for American Progress, mocks media mogul Rupert Murdoch for raising his children in the Catholic Church and said that most “powerful elements” in the conservative movement are all Catholic.

8. Mrs. Clinton admitted she has a hard time relating to the struggles of the middle class.

In a 2014 speech for Goldman Sachs and BlackRock, Mrs. Clinton admitted her riches and public persona lifestyle isolated her from the financial struggles of most of the country, saying her memories of her childhood is how she connects now to everyday Americans.

“Obviously, I’m kind of far removed because the life I’ve lived and the economic, you know, fortunes that my husband and I now enjoy,” Mrs. Clinton said of relating to the middle class.

9. Mrs. Clinton campaign used Benghazi as a distraction from the email scandal.

Mrs. Clinton’s campaign tried to make her email scandal disappear during the Benghazi probe by trying to conflate and confuse the two separate incidents. Mr. Podesta told aides in March 2015 to steer the media’s attention from the email scandal to the House Benghazi investigation, which they felt had already been painted in the media as a Republican witch hunt.

10. The Clinton team strategized on how to delay releasing emails, knowing it was against the law.

After receiving a subpoena for her emails, Clinton insider Phillipe Reines in March 2015 discussed strategies to use as an excuse not to release all of her emails. It appeared to constitute a conscious effort of the Clinton camp to frustrate and delay a congressional subpoena. Mr. Reines said of the emails: “Not flippantly, and maybe just from Nick’s [Merrill, Clinton spokesman] mouth — but rather than going around on how to release the 55k let’s just be for what’s happening and use this as an excuse. Because we can say even if State has equities, not providing them would put her in legal jeopardy OR we can say happy for them to have it, happy for them to have them as soon as State is comfortable.”

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/12/top-10-hillary-clinton-scandals-exposed-wikileaks/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on October 14, 2016, 06:22:00 pm
UPDATED: More Damning Podesta Email Leaks Emerge, MSM Ignores
After subpoena Podesta asks about withholding emails exchanged between Hillary and Obama.

UpDATE: As of Friday morning, Wikileaks released its seventh batch of Podesta emails, which can be accessed here.

**Newly added email topics will appear in bold-underscore, at the top of the bullet-point list featured below. This post will be updated regularly, so please check back. Readers are also welcome to send us emails or links for further investigation.

Conservative and independent bloggers, social media users and Trump supporters are likely doing their best to sift through and disseminate the information contained in these emails and it is easy to lose track. In order to simplify, we've compiled a brief roundup of the more damning subjects the Podesta email chain seem to broach.

The following list is not exhaustive and includes:

Clinton advisor Neera Tanden slammed Hillary to Podesta: "God. Her instincts are suboptimal." and "The sooner Hillary gets that life is not fair, the better off she will be."
Tanden also complained about Obama's campaign "white dudes running everything is terrible"
Hillary predicted "multiple aggressive terror attacks including on American & European soil"
After subpoena Podesta suggests withholding emails exchanged between Hillary Clinton and President Obama
Podesta facilitated meetings between Eric Schmidt, Exec Chairman of Google's parent company and Robby Mook and Cheryl Mills
NY Times warns Hillary in advance of stories it is about to publish
Hillary Clinton campaign tried to take down Obama in 2008 for his "Muslim" background and "****" use
Email seems to reveal ABC's Stephanopolous colluded with Clinton camp to discredit Peter Schweizer, author of Clinton Cash
Podesta says it's great to be able to feed stories to the media who "Tee Up for Us" -- cites NY Time's Maggie Haberman
Roby Mook tried to get Illinois to push forward its primary date to favor Clinton, said the Clinton's "don't forget what their friends have done for them"
Podesta owns 75,000 shares of Putin-backed company
Clinton camp planted fake sexist Trump jobs ads on Craigslist
Details about Clinton's involvement and cover-up in the Uranium One deal. During her time as Secretary of State, Clinton approved the sale of roughly 20% of our nation's uranium production to a Russian-government backed company called Uranium One, which in turn donated millions to the Clinton Foundation. Clinton did not disclose these donations, covering them up instead.
The Department of Justice colluded with the Clinton campaign on the email investigation likely in order to prepare her.
Podesta plotted a "Catholic Spring," seeking to subvert the Catholic church with progressive ideologies)
Catholics, Evangelicals, Southerners and other demographic groups were disparaged and mocked.
Clinton-attorney David Kendal admits legal team did not turn over important email thumb drive and server to State Department.
African Americans and Muslims were disparaged as "losers."
Podesta urged Hillary Clinton to make an "easy" phone call in order to ensure the support of "needy Latinos"
Multiple emails reveal mainstream media collusion with the Clinton campaign including from the Washington Post and CNN, among other outlets.
Clinton staffers discussed which of Hillary Clinton's emails to release and which not to (i.e. delete).
Donna Brazile in fact had the exact wording of a proposed CNN town hall question and fed it to the Clinton campaign prior to the event.
Hillary Campaign planned (and succeeded) to fool Bernie Sanders and his "self-righteous ideologue" supporters at the convention. Podesta and campaign staff planned to "throw [Sanders] a bone" at the convention by falsely vowing to curb the Superdelegate system. This was done to make Sanders and his "bitching" supporters "think they've won something."
Saudi Arabia and Qatar -- both big donors to the Clinton Foundation -- are funding ISIS.
Campaign feared what, exactly, was in Clinton's emails.
Preferential treatment would be given to "Friends of Bill" following the Haiti earthquake.
Hillary Clinton called Bernie Sanders supporters a "bucket of losers" in Goldman Sachs speech. She also admitted to having two faces and two sets of policies -- one she reveals to the public, the other in private.
Clinton's own campaign called her a "mediocre" and "lackluster" candidate.
Clinton campaign was concerned about Bill Clinton's sex-life as a liability to the campaign.
Campaign staff admitted that Clinton often lies and said she should not press Sanders for his medical records during the primaries, insinuating it would open a can of worms for her.
The proof is irrefutable. Mainstream media are engaged in a concerted effort to sway the presidential race and elect Hillary Clinton the next President of the United States. That's why each and every major outlet is currently attempting to divert attention away from damaging information revealed in hacked emails originating from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.

Wikileaks has released several batches -- totaling more than 10,000 to date -- of Podesta emails and has promised more to come. The Clinton campaign has neither confirmed nor denied their authenticity, though many believe that Clinton herself confirmed the emails' veracity by addressing one of the claims contained therein during the second presidential debate. 

Below are a few snapshots of various email threads from the Podesta leaks. We will add new snapshots regularly, so please check back:

(http://www.truthrevolt.org/sites/default/files/images/Obama%20hillary%20email%20take%20down%203.png)

(http://www.truthrevolt.org/sites/default/files/images/Podesta%20emails%20on%20trying%20to%20bring%20down%20obama%20.png)

(http://www.truthrevolt.org/sites/default/files/images/Podesta%20emails%20on%20media%20friends.png)

More detailed information is contained in each of these various email threads, particularly concerning media collusion. The link provided above and here to Wikileaks' John Podesta email page is easily searchable. We will update this post as more revelations emerge.

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/updated-more-damning-podesta-email-leaks-emerge-msm-ignores


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on October 15, 2016, 06:11:45 pm
Media Scramble to Claim Hillary Clinton Never Laughed About Kathy Shelton’s **** as a Child — Despite Video Evidence

GOP nominee Donald Trump attempted to rattle Hillary Clinton by seating the women she has allegedly intimidated throughout her long career in the front row during the second presidential debate. At one point, Trump called attention to one now-grown woman who was raped as a child on the side of the road whom Hillary allegedly trashed while defending her rapist, and later laughed about it on tape.
“One of them is a wonderful woman, [who] at 12 years old was raped. At twelve. Her client—she represented—got him off, laughing on two separate occasions, laughing at the girl that was raped. Kathy Shelton, that young woman, is here with us tonight,” Trump said.

Pro-Clinton media leapt to Clinton’s defense after Trump’s blistering debate attack.

“It is totally false to say that Hillary Clinton laughed about the **** of a 12-year-old,” Politico wrote. Clinton “chuckled,” the outlet asserted, which means Trump is “wrong.” The headline reads: “Trump is wrong: Hillary Clinton did not laugh about the **** of a 12-year-old,” which the widely-publicized tape of Clinton discussing the child **** case proves false on its face.

Similarly, Politifact wrote: “Trump is referring to an audio tape in which she does respond with amusement at her recollections of the oddities of the case, which involve the prosecution and the judge. At no point does she laugh at the victim.”

Both sites are engaging in “Ben Smithing,” named for Buzzfeed editor-in-chief Ben Smith formerly of Politico, where they pretend to investigate and explain a story damaging to Democrats in order to dismiss it.

On May 10, 1975, Shelton got into the truck of a local paper factory worker who said he would take her to get a soda. She was only twelve years old at the time, riding her bike around her neighborhood before she encountered the man, Alfred Thomas Taylor, and a 15-year-old male acquaintance of his. Taylor drove his truck into a ravine and raped Shelton while beating her, calling the child a “****,” and saying, “you like it, you know it” as he violated her. Shelton managed to flee to a nearby home, falling unconscious and waking up in a hospital.

Taylor was destitute and asked for a female lawyer, leading to Clinton taking the case. In court, Clinton defended Taylor enthusiastically:

One of Clinton’s first moves was to raise questions about the credibility of the 12-year-old victim.
In a July 18, 1975, affidavit, Clinton asked the court to order Shelton to undergo a psychiatric examination from a doctor selected by the Taylor’s legal team.

The evaluation was necessary, she argued, because Shelton was “emotionally unstable.”

“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing,’ wrote Clinton. ‘I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body.”

The 12-year-old girl also “exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way,” argued Clinton.

And so, Clinton had a doctor subject Shelton to a psychiatric examination. Shelton said being repeatedly questioned about the **** she endured was one of her “worst memories.”

“It got so bad that I told my mom I wasn’t going back, and whatever happened, happened. It’s sad that a 12-year-old had to go through what I had to go through, because for days I cried and cried and cried over it,” Shelton said decades later.

The crime lab that analyzed Taylor’s blood and semen-stained underwear tossed out the soiled section after testing it, and Clinton brought the remnants to a famous New York City forensic expert, who said not enough blood remained for the defense to test it again. Clinton told the prosecutor about her meeting with the forensics expert.

“I said, ‘This guy’s ready to come from New York to prevent this miscarriage of justice,'” Clinton recounted in a taped interview with a burst of laughter. “So we were gonna plea bargain.”

Shelton was a virgin when she was raped.

Taylor, whose original charge of first-degree **** carried a possible life sentence in prison, served less than a year in county jail for unlawful fondling of a minor after pleading down.

Shelton survived, but the attack left her in a coma, unable to bear children, and affected the rest of her life. She became addicted to drugs for a period of time and avoided men after the attack.

A taped interview surfaced in 2014, showing a disturbing side of Clinton as she discussed the case. As Breitbart News previously reported:

In the mid-1980s, journalist Roy Reed interviewed Hillary Clinton, and a tape of that interview has been uploaded to YouTube and is available in the Special Collections Department of the University of Arkansas libraries. 

“He took a lie detector test! I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs,” Clinton said about her client Thomas Alfred Taylor, who raped Shelton in 1975, laughing.

https://youtu.be/rQAKUKYVsDY

“I asked to be relieved of that responsibility but I was not and I had a professional duty to represent my client to the best of my ability, which I did,” Clinton said at the time.

But Shelton was in disbelief that Clinton had laughed about her rapist’s clear guilt.

“She didn’t mention that she was laughing and saying [Taylor] was guilty. I guess as a lawyer it is your responsibility to defend someone… But if she’s for women and children, why would she defend someone knowing that a 12-year-old got raped?” Shelton told the Daily Mail in August. “If she brought it up there would probably be some questions asked that she wouldn’t be able to answer. Because after laughing on that tape, she’s pretty much stuck in knowing that she lied, knowing that it happened to me. And that tape’s out there to be listened to by anybody.”

Even the Daily Beast somberly called the tape “jaw-dropping” when it came to light.

“It’s hardly unusual for a criminal trial lawyer to gossip about a courtroom triumph on behalf of a less than admirable client, often with gallows humor and over drinks after a hard day’s work,” the Beast reported in June 2014. “But it’s highly unusual for a lawyer to boast and laugh about such a circumstance in an on-the-record interview with a journalist—and pretty much jaw-dropping when the lawyer is Hillary Rodham Clinton.”

“For a former first lady, U.S. senator and secretary of state who touts her decades-long record of championing women and children, this snapshot of her legal career is—to put it mildly—way off-message,” the Beast added.

Clinton laughing about a child **** case where she knew the rapist was guilty is disturbing on a visceral level and undermines Clinton’s professed image as a warm, loving, compassionate advocate for women and children.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/14/media-scramble-to-claim-hillary-clinton-never-laughed-about-kathy-sheltons-****-as-a-child-despite-video-evidence/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on October 16, 2016, 04:07:17 am
The Hillary Clinton Campaign Needs to Explain This Email

One of the more than 10,000 emails released by WikiLeaks so far has resumed the conspiracy theory that Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia was assassinated by liberals seeking to shift the balance of the high court.

In the Feb. 9 email—sent just three days prior to when it is believed Scalia passed away—Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and Steve Elmendorf, a longtime Democratic operative with connections all over Washington, D.C., discuss the term "wet works."

"Didn't think wet works meant pool parties at The Vineyard," Podesta wrote, referencing social gatherings at Martha's Vineyard—a popular vacation spot for Washington elites. While it's not clear what brought up the term "wet works," conspiracy theorists immediately jumped on the most common connotation for the phrase: covert assassinations.

Given the timing of the email, the theory suggests Podesta and Elmendorf were somehow involved in Scalia's death—which itself included a number of unusual circumstances. Elmendorf's response to Podesta further fanned those flames.

"I am all in," he wrote. "Sounds like it will be a bad nite [sic], we all need to buckle up and double down."

There is, however, a much more reasonable possibility—but that, too, creates some very disturbing unanswered questions.

Feb. 9 was the night of the New Hampshire Primary, which was a thorough defeat for Hillary Clinton at the hands of U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). Polling had suggested it was going to be bad, but the early returns gave prelude to an epic disaster—Sanders won by more than 22 points.

That explains the "bad night" and the need to "buckle up and double down." And that also leaves us with the troubling "wet works" comment from Podesta.

Covert assassination is not the only use of the term. According to numerous "slang dictionaries," it also is a crude reference for a disgusting homosexual sex act, performed in exchange for money.

Elmendorf is openly homosexual. John Podesta has been married and has three children. So regardless of which term Clinton's campaign chairman meant, it might be a good idea to break the "radio silence" and address this email.

http://www.charismanews.com/politics/elections/60571-the-hillary-clinton-campaign-needs-to-explain-this-email


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 17, 2016, 03:21:54 pm
(https://usahitman.com/wp-content/uploads/chain-letter.png)


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on October 24, 2016, 07:46:40 pm
‘Unquestionably a violation’: Clinton sent US operations info to Podesta’s hacked email

DC NEWSBy Michael Bastasch, DCNF

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s sending of U.S. intelligence information to her campaign chair’s unsecured email address is “unquestionably” an operations security violation, according to an intelligence expert.

“It’s unquestionably an OPSEC violation,” Dr. John Schindler, a former NSA analyst and national security expert, told The Daily Caller News Foundation, regarding an email Clinton sent to Podesta that included U.S. intelligence sources.

OPSEC stands for operations security — meaning the keeping of critical military intelligence out of enemy hands. The email was published online by WikiLeaks from Clinton aide John Podesta’s hacked Gmail account

U.S. intelligence officials suspect Russia was behind the hack, and a private cyber security firm recently linked the hackers were linked Russian intelligence.

Schindler said specific information in the hacked email regarding a confidential “source in Tripoli” was “not something anybody should be putting in unclassified email.”

Clinton sent Podesta an email in August 2014 giving her assessment of what needs to be done in the Middle East. Clinton said her sources were based on “Western intelligence, US intelligence and sources” in the Middle East, and specifically referred to a source in Libya.

“A source in Tripoli stated in confidence that when the U.S. Embassy was evacuated, the presence of two U.S. Navy jet fighters over the city brought all fighting to a halt for several hours, as Islamist forces were not certain that these aircraft would not also provide close ground support for moderate government forces,” Clinton wrote to Podesta.

The email was one of thousands published online by WikiLeaks. Schindler said it’s unclear if the email contained any “secret” information or what classification of the intelligence was Clinton presented to Podesta.

“It’s tough to say if it’s secret — US military moves usually are considered such at the time it happens,” Schindler said, adding the “exact classification would depend on how they learned this.”

Clinton sent the email from a private account she began using after leaving the Department of State that’s based out of her home in Chappaqua, New York. The FBI has already investigated Clinton over her handling of classified information while serving as Secretary of State, including storing classified materials on her private email server.

FBI Director James Comey said Clinton’s handling of classified materials was “extremely careless,” but declined to recommend bringing charges against the former State Department head.

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2016/10/22/unquestionably-violation-clinton-sent-us-operations-info-podestas-hacked-email-403289


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on October 25, 2016, 04:35:43 am
EGYPT FILES SUIT AGAINST BARACK OBAMA AND HILLARY CLINTON FOR CONSPIRING WITH MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD
In two separate criminal complaints, Egyptian lawmakers have charged Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton with conspiring with the Muslim Brotherhood...

THE EGYPTIAN COMPLAINT READS THAT “BARACK OBAMA ASSISTED THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN CRIMES AGAINST EGYPT AND IT’S CITIZENS”
“Let his days be few; and let another take his office.” Psalm 109:8 (KJV)

My favorite expression about Barack Obama is “Everything is calculated.” I read comments and commentaries about how inept he is — that he does not know what he is doing. Ha! Obama knows exactly what he’s doing.

Remember when BHO went on the apology tour right after he was elected in 2008? Remember when he told world leaders that America had been involved in too many countries affairs and deserved the name “The world’s policeman?”

How in the world do you think that the so-called Arab Spring came about? Obama was a major player in this, and his Puppetmaster, George Soros, supplied the money. The plan was to destabilize the Middles East, and rid the Arabic countries of their secular governments, and replace them with the Muslim Brotherhood. That was the plan.

His diabolical plan backfired in Egypt. Not only was his great buddy, Mohamed Morsi, ousted, but he was incarcerated in 2012. He still sits in a jail cell to this day.

Egypt also jailed many members of the Muslim Brotherhood, and made it a crime to be part of this terrorist organization. Think about this: Obama has hosted the Muslim Brotherhood in the White House on several occasions. He has not hidden this from the press.

THIS IS SO SERIOUS TO THE EGYPTIAN GOVERNMENT, THAT OBAMA AND HILLARY CLINTON HAVE FORMAL CHARGES FILED AGAINST THEM IN EGYPT.
“In two separate criminal complaints, Egyptian lawmakers have charged Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton with conspiring with the Muslim Brotherhood.”

https://youtu.be/BqO0b_VcQ_Q

According to one of the criminal charges, Hillary Clinton was found to be working with ousted Muslim Brotherhood president Mohammed Morsi’s wife, Naglaa Mahmood, in attempting to overthrow the current leader of Egypt, General Abdel Fatah Al-Sisi.

But this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Watch Western Center for Journalism’s exclusive video to find out all the details about the traitor in the White House, Barack Hussein Obama, and his Muslim Brotherhood collaborator, Hillary Rodham Clinton.” [1] – source

WHAT’S SO BAD ABOUT THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD?
History of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt (1939-1954)

Links to the Nazis began during the 1930s and were close during the Second World War, involving agitation against the British, espionage and sabotage, as well as support for terrorist activities orchestrated by Haj Amin el-Hussaini in British Mandate Palestine, as a wide range of declassified documents from the British, American and Nazi German governmental archives, as well as from personal accounts and memoires from that period, confirm. Reflecting this connection the Muslim Brotherhood also disseminated Hitler’s Mein Kampf and The Protocols of the Elders of Zion widely in Arab translations, helping to deepen and extend already existing hostile views about Jews and Western societies generally.

In November 1948 police seized an automobile containing the documents and plans of what is thought to be the Brotherhood’s `secret apparatus` with names of its members. The seizure was preceded by an assortment of bombings and assassination attempts by the apparatus. Subsequently 32 of its leaders were arrested and its offices raided. The next month the Egyptian Prime Minister, Mahmud Fahmi Nokrashi, ordered the dissolution of the Brotherhood.
On December 28, 1948 Egypt’s prime minister was assassinated by Brotherhood member and veterinary student Abdel Meguid Ahmed Hassan, in what is thought to have been retaliation for the government crackdown. A month and half later Al-Banna himself was killed in Cairo by men believed to be government agents and/or supporters of the murdered premier. Al-Banna was succeeded as head of the Brotherhood by Hassan Isma’il al-Hudaybi, a former judge.

In 1952, members of the Muslim Brotherhood are accused of taking part in arson that destroyed some “750 buildings” in downtown Cairo — mainly night clubs, theatres, hotels, and restaurants frequented by British and other foreigners — “that marked the end of the liberal, progressive, cosmopolitan” Egypt.

The Brotherhood supported the military coup that overthrew the monarchy in 1952, but the junta was unwilling to share power or lift martial law and clashed with the Brotherhood. [2] – source

BARACK OBAMA AND HILLARY CLINTON – MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MEMBERS
It does not take a rocket scientist to clearly see that BHO and Hillary are Muslim Brotherhood operatives. People – we ARE the frogs in the pot of water, which is heated very slowly as we happily hop around. The water get a tiny bit hotter little by little. Then, without seeing it coming, we are boiled and destroyed.

It may be too late already

It most certainly may be too late for us. By that I mean that America has turned her back on God, and is so immersed in gross, unspeakable sin, that God’s judgment IS Barack Obama, and possibly Hillary Rodham Clinton in 2016.

Those of us who belong to God must pray for America. Even though it looks so bleak, our Father is waiting to hear from us:

“If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.” 2 Chronicles 7:14 (KJV)

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/bho-hillary-clinton-law-suit-egypt/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on October 28, 2016, 05:22:15 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHCezI-5Yzk


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on October 28, 2016, 05:25:50 pm
2006 Audio Emerges of Hillary Clinton Proposing Rigging Palestine Election
Unearthed tape: 'We should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win'

On September 5, 2006, Eli Chomsky was an editor and staff writer for the Jewish Press, and Hillary Clinton was running for a shoo-in re-election as a U.S. senator. Her trip making the rounds of editorial boards brought her to Brooklyn to meet the editorial board of the Jewish Press.

The tape was never released and has only been heard by the small handful of Jewish Press staffers in the room. According to Chomsky, his old-school audiocassette is the only existent copy and no one has heard it since 2006, until today when he played it for the Observer.

The tape is 45 minutes and contains much that is no longer relevant, such as analysis of the re-election battle that Sen. Joe Lieberman was then facing in Connecticut. But a seemingly throwaway remark about elections in areas controlled by the Palestinian Authority has taken on new relevance amid persistent accusations in the presidential campaign by Clinton’s Republican opponent Donald Trump that the current election is “rigged.”

rest: http://observer.com/2016/10/2006-audio-emerges-of-hillary-clinton-proposing-rigging-palestine-election/


In related news

CITIES PUSH FOR ILLEGALS TO VOTE...
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-10-28/some-cities-want-their-immigrants-to-vote

DEAD CAST BALLOTS IN CHICAGO...
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2016/10/27/2-investigators-chicago-voters-cast-ballots-from-beyond-the-grave/

FROM THE GRAVE IN PHILLY...
http://6abc.com/politics/action-news-investigation-voting-from-the-grave/1575596/

VOTE FLIPPING MARYLAND...
http://www.infowars.com/maryland-trump-supporter-they-switched-my-vote-to-hillary/

ELECTION FRAUD FLORIDA...
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/election/article111029767.html

FAKE REGISTRATION VIRGINIA...
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/politics/Man-Accused-With-Filing-Fake-Voter-Registration-Applications-399027631.html


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on October 28, 2016, 07:49:00 pm
.;..Computer Seized In Weiner Probe Prompts FBI to Take New Steps In Clinton Email Inquiry -Washington Post

Newly discovered emails found on a computer seized during an investigation of disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) have prompted the FBI to make new inquiries related to Hillary Clinton’s private email server, according to three people familiar with the deliberations. FBI Director James B. Comey informed congressional leaders Friday that the agency would take “appropriate investigative steps” to determine whether the newly discovered emails contain classified information and to assess their importance to the Clinton server probe.

http://www.newsforchristians.com/hdr-02.gif


..;.New Emails in Clinton Case Came From Devices Once Used by Anthony Weiner   -New York Times


A new trove of emails that appear pertinent to the now-closed investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server was discovered after the F.B.I. seized at least one electronic device shared by Anthony D. Weiner and his estranged wife, Huma Abedin, a top aide to Mrs. Clinton, federal law enforcement officials said Friday. The F.B.I. is investigating illicit text messages that Mr. Weiner, a former Democratic congressman from New York, sent to a 15-year-old girl in North Carolina. The bureau told Congress on Friday that it had uncovered new emails related to the Clinton case — one federal official said they numbered in the tens of thousands — potentially reigniting an issue that has weighed on the presidential campaign and offering a lifeline to Donald J. Trump less than two weeks before the election.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/29/us/politics/fbi-hillary-clinton-email.html?_r=0


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on October 28, 2016, 10:18:50 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-W-SYn-uhk


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on October 29, 2016, 05:42:57 pm
(https://conservativedailypost-guvbvzsunddro8yrw.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/hillary.png)

BREAKING: WIKILEAKS JUST RELEASED FULL ISIS DONOR LIST WITH NAMES

Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton are the founders of ISIS. We have proven that through emails and documents leaked from WikiLeaks, but liberal media outlets still refuse to cover it.

After all, they are still more focused on what Trump said eleven years ago than what Hillary has actually done.

Because of brave patriots like Julian Assange, we have been given more evidence that Hillary Clinton is more connected to ISIS than we originally believed.

An email was leaked between Clinton and John Podesta indicating that: “Western intelligence, US intelligence and sources in the region” to accuse Qatar and Saudi Arabia of “providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL [or ISIS] and other radical Sunni groups in the region.”

Citing the need to “use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets,” said Hillary to Podesta while arguing the current developments in the Middle East were “important to the U.S. for reasons that often differ from country to country.”

Odd that Clinton argues Saudi Arabia and Qatar are helping fund ISIS when Hillary’s largest donations come from those two countries.

In another correspondence from 2012, the Director of Foreign Policy at the Clinton Foundation, Amitabh Desai, set up a meeting with Bill Clinton for five minutes in exchange for a $1,000,000 “birthday check.”

The email adds that the small but rich nation occupying the Qatar Peninsula would “welcome [the Clinton Foundation’s] suggestions for investments in Haiti — particularly on education and health.” Desai added that while Qatar had already “allocated most of their $20 million … [they were] happy to consider projects we suggest.”

We now see two more examples of the Clinton’s acting corrupt and being intertwined with nations that fund ISIS.

For those that do not see where the dots connect, let’s simplify how this all worked for Hillary.

Hillary, as Secretary of State, would sell terrorist nations large weapons deals only after they gave her a very generous donation to her “foundation.” These weapons, provided by Hillary and her State Department, then filtered down from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Libya, and so on to create, supply, and bolster terrorist groups.

That is exactly how ISIS was created. But instead of blowing them up with an air assault, Hillary and Obama decided to leave ISIS alone. Why? Because ISIS being in the Middle East allows the Obama/Clinton machine to make millions in personal profits from these nations in a repetitive cycle of selling weapons.

They are choosing personal gain over eliminating a terrorist group. Let that sink in. Why else have they not arrested Hillary for all of these crimes? The FBI would arrest you in a heartbeat if you went to Facebook right now to praise Allah and ISIS.

It also speaks volumes as to why they are trying so hard to silence Julian Assange.

The media remains silent on all of this. This would be plastered all over the news for months if a President Trump was exposed for this.

Ignorant politicians are not the problem. The problem is that ignorant people keep voting for them every election. This is the exact reason we desperately need change in this country, and it starts with Donald Trump.

People like Julian Assange have given up their lives to expose corruption in government and allowing Hillary Clinton to win this election makes all of his sacrifices meaningless.

He has offered us a chance to revolt against our tyrannical government. Chances likes this do not occur often, and if we do not seize the opportunity, we will suffer another four years of suppression from our corrupt leaders.

Vote Trump, so that we can save America and he can pardon Julian Assange.

rest: https://conservativedailypost.com/breaking-wikileaks-just-released-full-isis-donor-list-with-names/?utm_source=Email&utm_campaign=29_October&utm_medium=Aweber


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 05, 2016, 06:54:06 am
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/04/politics/rudy-giuliani-hillary-clinton-email-fbi/index.html
11/4/16
Giuliani changes story on FBI

Washington (CNN)Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani now denies that he was told by former FBI agents that the bureau was reviewing newly discovered emails potentially related to Hillary Clinton's use of a private server before the review was publicly revealed.

Giuliani, a top Donald Trump surrogate and adviser, told CNN's Wolf Blitzer on "The Situation Room" Friday that the FBI's announcement "came as a complete surprise, except to the extent that maybe it wasn't as much of a surprise."

"I got it all from former FBI agents. Tremendous anger within the FBI about the way, number one, Jim Comey's conclusion (to not recommend criminal charges in July) and, number two, the way they believed they were being obstructed by what they regard as a pretty corrupt Obama Justice Department," Giuliani said. "Cutting off a grand jury investigation, cutting off subpoenas."

Earlier Friday, Giuliani, a former federal prosecutor, said he had "heard about" a forthcoming FBI announcement before it became public.
"This has been boiling up in the FBI. I did nothing to get it out. I had no role in it. Did I hear about it? Darn right I heard about it," Giuliani said on "Fox and Friends." He continued, "I can't even repeat the language I heard from the former FBI agents."

Giuliani insisted to Blitzer that he did not receive a tip from someone currently in the FBI.

"In my case, it's real simple: I've talked to no FBI agent, I've talked to no Justice Department official. I have no idea about who's leaking information."

The former mayor added that everyone he does talk to in the FBI is a former agent.

Blitzer reminded Giuliani that in an October 28 interview on "The Lars Larson Show," the former mayor said he was in contact with former agents "and a few active agents, who obviously don't want to identify themselves."

"Well, the information I've been getting is from former FBI agents," Giuliani told Blitzer. "If I did say that, that was wrong."

Clinton campaign press secretary Brian Fallon suggested earlier Friday that an inspector general could have grounds to look into the possible leaking of information to Giuliani.

"This sure seems like adequate grounds for an Inspector General review," he tweeted.

    This sure seems like adequate grounds for an Inspector General review.https://t.co/EEJIfrFB0H
    — Brian Fallon (@brianefallon) November 4, 2016

Soon after Fallon's tweet, Reps. Elijah Cummings and John Conyers, Jr., the ranking members of the House Oversight and Judiciary committees, called on the Inspector General of the Justice Department to "conduct an immediate investigation to determine the source of multiple unauthorized—and often inaccurate—leaks from within the FBI to benefit the presidential campaign of Donald Trump."

Speaking to Blitzer Friday, Cummings said, "Giuliani made it clear, Wolf, that he was getting information from former FBI agents. Now, Mr. Giuliani knows better. He was a former federal prosecutor. You don't use the former prosecutors to launder information coming in from the FBI. That's basically what he said. That's not right."

Cummings said the continuous leaks from this investigation are a "threat to our democracy," noting, "normally when you ask the FBI whether there this is an investigation, 99.99% of the time, they say, 'No comment.'

Blitzer asked Cummings if he had confidence in Comey.

"Yes. I do. I believe the FBI director is an honorable man. But he made a mistake here," Cummings replied.


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 05, 2016, 12:31:18 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cz1DLh7wzk


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on November 07, 2016, 05:29:38 pm
FBI: No charges for Clinton over newly discovered emails

FBI Director James Comey informed key lawmakers on Sunday that he still does not believe that Hillary Clinton should face criminal prosecution over her use of private email servers during her time as secretary of state. Comey said his conclusion came after FBI agents reviewed all of the newly discovered messages to or from Clinton found on electronic devices that belonged to her top aide’s estranged husband, disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fbis-comey-says-new-clinton-emails-did-not-change-his-position-205329410.html

2Ti 3:1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on November 16, 2016, 03:58:33 pm
Rep. Jason Chaffetz: I Will Continue to Investigate Clinton! FBI Director James Comey Likely To Be Replaced By President Trump
(Video)   


http://investmentwatchblog.com/yuuuge-rep-jason-chaffetz-i-will-continue-to-investigate-clinton-fbi-director-james-comey-likely-to-be-replaced-by-president-trump/

https://youtu.be/agTGDv9gdok


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on November 30, 2016, 03:20:32 pm
German Ministry of Environment Made 4.5Mln Euro Donations to Clinton Foundation

The donation scandal around the Clinton Foundation is attracting more and more attention. Recently, it turned out that not only GIZ donated 2.4 million euro of taxpayers' money to the American institution, but that the Federal Ministry of the Environment is also involved in the scandal and donated 4.5 million euro to the foundation.

In an interview with Sputnik Germany, Bundestag MP and member of the Left party Niema Movassat wondered why the information about such controversial financial practices of German state institutions came out so late. For a long time, established media and politicians had been keeping silent about this issue and the politician believes that there could be certain reasons behind this. "I wonder why it didn't come up earlier. Journalist Tilo Jung reported about it in his blog in May 2016 and there was no reaction at that time. And now it all came out after the election. Many questions arise given the profile of the Clinton Foundation. You can get the impression that one or another journalist did not want to talk about it too loudly during the election campaign because there was already a great sympathy for Clinton," Movassat told Sputnik Germany.

Earlier, it was reported the German Society for International Cooperation (GIZ) appeared on the list of sponsors of the Clinton Foundation on the official website of the latter and is assumed to have donated from one to five million US dollars to the American institution.

The GIZ confirmed on its website that it has donated a total of 2.4 million euro to the Clinton Foundation from 2013 to 2016. The money was supposed to finance a development project that was commissioned to the Foundation by Germany's Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. Whether they have been spent for the project, however, remains questionable. Now it turned out that the German Ministry of the Environment also donated 4.5 million euros to the foundation. "It is a great surprise that they had given money in the high phase of the election campaign — that's not ten years ago, but now. For everyone who has some political understanding it should be clear that in such a phase you can't give money to a foundation of that kind," the politician told Sputnik Germany.

Meanwhile, both institutions are struggling to explain their decisions. In particular, they say that the funds had been transferred to the Clinton Foundation for concrete projects and in no way were supposed to finance the election campaign of the presidential candidate.

The Federal Ministry of Environment replied to a request of journalist Tilo Jung in a following manner: "Dear Mr. Jung, you recently have sent a request to the BPK about the Clinton Foundation. To this end, I can tell you the following: Within the framework of the International Climate Protection Initiative (IKI), the Federal Ministry for the Environment promotes two projects with the participation of the Clinton Foundation. These are initiatives in the IKI funding area ‘Conservation, Reconstruction and Sustainable Use of Natural Carbon Sinks.'" "The first project "Support for forestry and landscape restoration in East Africa" is supported by us with around 1.5 million euros and carried out directly by the Clinton Foundation in Kenya and Ethiopia." "Together with the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), the Clinton Foundation is implementing the second IKI project "Rehabilitation of forest ecosystems at a landscape level as a cost-effective bridge for the integrated implementation of national land-based mitigation and adaptation strategies". We have funded this project with around EUR 3 million."

Movassat finds the explanation insufficient given the fact that the financing had been going on in the third quarter of 2016, when Clinton's election campaign was in full swing.

The politician had also sent a request to GIZ, asking the institution to comment on its donations. In response he received a letter, a part of which said that "GIZ did not provided funds or donations to the Clinton Foundation to finance the US campaign of Hillary Clinton" and that the foundation "has an obligation to account for the correct use of funds to the GIZ," which for its turn "is accountable" to Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation. According to the politician, the letter is very similar to the statement published on the website of the German Society for International Cooperation earlier, and doesn't contain any detailed explanations on the issue. "I think they should really explain how it could come to such financing activities. By whom and when the application had been sent, who lobbied whom. We need to carefully examine all these aspects in order to eliminate any smell of corruption and any deals," the politician said. "I assume that there may be one or another case, which is still completely unknown," he concluded.

Read more: https://sputniknews.com/politics/201611301048008101-german-ministry-clinton/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on December 11, 2016, 07:33:10 pm
Hillary pleads to dismiss lawsuit against her

Lawyers for twice-failed Oval Office aspirant Hillary Clinton have asked a federal court in Washington, D.C., to dismiss a lawsuit over her statements as secretary of state about the Benghazi terror attack that left four Americans dead.

The plaintiffs are arguing the case should to go trial because she doesn’t deserve special treatment as a member of the “political elite.”

Clinton narrowly averted a default judgment in the case earlier when a judge adopted claims that she wasn’t properly served.

Then she argued in court filings that the case should be dismissed, claiming the plaintiffs, Patricia Smith, the mother of Sean Smith, and Charles Woods, the father of Tyrone Woods, haven’t properly claimed they were injured.

The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by lawyer Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch USA after the FBI determined Clinton’s handling of classified information through the use of a nonsecure, private email server was “extremely careless.”

They allege that she told them one story about the attack, then told the media another story, and ended up calling the family members liars.

But the claims are plain, according to a new filing in the case, which contends that the plaintiffs have properly presented false light claims, correctly provided claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and “properly alleged” other damages.

“Plaintiffs respectfully request that the court rule on defendant Clinton’s motion in a politically neutral fashion, as defendant Clinton, like everyone else before the court, is not above the law,” the filing states.

“To treat her differently than others would be treated would create and perpetuate a terrible precedent, as the American people have come to believe that, in effect, there are two systems of justice; one for the political elite establishment, and one for the rest of the citizens of our nation.”

The case is based on claims by family members that when Clinton met with them at Joint Base Andrews, she told them the Benghazi attack was “a result of an Internet video criticizing the prophet Mohammad.”

She said this even though she knew the statement to be false, the claim asserts.

But she later changed her story, and “negligently, recklessly, and/or maliciously defamed plaintiffs by either directly calling them liars, or by strongly implying that they are liars, in order to protect and enhance her public image and intimidate and emotionally harm and silence them to not speak up about the Benghazi attack.”

For example, the memo documents that in a 2015 interview with ABC News, she “flat out falsely denied telling the families of Benghazi victims that the YouTube video caused the attack.”

She told her daughter immediately that the attacks were acts of terrorism, but later told others they were sparked by the obscure video.

“Look, I understand the continuing grief at the loss that parents experienced with the loss of these four brave Americans,” Clinton said. “And I did testify, as you know, for 11 hours. And I answered all of these questions. Now, I can’t – can’t help it the people think there has to be something else there. I said very clearly there had been a terrorist group, uh, that had taken responsibility on Facebook, um, between the time that, uh, I – you know, when I talked to my daughter, that was the latest information; we were, uh, giving it credibility. And then we learned the next day it wasn’t true. In fact, they retracted it. This was a fast-moving series of events in the fog of war.”

The memo states: “Clinton, in her motion, operates under the false presumption that she was acting with the scope of her employment when she used a private email server to transmit and receive classified and confidential information, and thereby fatally jeopardizing the safety of plaintiffs’ sons.”

The case contends her use of an unsecure email system allowed her messages to be hacked, and thus terrorists learned details of the American operations in Benghazi.

The memo says the solution is for the plaintiffs to be allowed to conduct discovery, and the results all be presented to a jury.

Smith and Woods were killed in the Sept. 11, 2012, jihadist attack on the American compound in Benghazi. While Clinton and other Obama administration officials were publicly blaming the deaths on a response to an obscure YouTube video, internal communications show they knew immediately that it was a terrorist attack.

Earlier in the case, Klayman explained: “Having used a secret private email server that we now know was used to communicate with Ambassador Christopher Stevens with confidential and classified government information, and which we also now know was likely hacked by hostile adversaries such as Iran, Russia, China and North Korea aligning with terrorist groups, it is clear that Hillary Clinton allegedly negligently and recklessly gave up the classified location of the plaintiffs’ sons, resulting in a deadly terrorist attack that took their lives. It is no coincidence that covert State Department/CIA operations were being run out of Benghazi.

“To add insult to deadly injury, Hillary Clinton told the plaintiffs that their sons were killed as the result of a video mocking the Islamic prophet Mohammed when she knew that they were murdered by Muslim terrorists. When the families exposed her lies, she called them liars to protect her reputation and to further her own presidential ambitions. She thus defamed the parents of fallen heroes Tyrone Woods and Sean Smith, and committed other wrongful acts, as alleged in the complaint.”

The lawsuit notes the FBI found Clinton, “at a minimum, was ‘extremely careless’ in handling confidential and classified government information and ‘there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information.'”

http://www.wnd.com/2016/12/hillary-pleads-to-dismiss-lawsuit-against-her/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on December 13, 2016, 07:31:16 pm
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/12/house-benghazi-committee-files-final-report-and-shuts-down/95336692/
12/12/16
House Benghazi committee files final report and shuts down

WASHINGTON — The special congressional investigation into the 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi is officially over now that the panel filed its final report the day before the House adjourned for the year.

The Select Committee on Benghazi initially released its findings in June but remained in place for months afterward trying to declassify supporting documents like emails and interview transcripts for public release.

The final report, not including dissenting views from committee Democrats, clocks in at more than 322,000 words. It was added to the official House record without fanfare on Dec. 7 by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., the panel’s chairman.

The panel, which spent more than $7.8 million over two and a half years, disbanded at the end of the 114th Congress, before a new Congress begins in January.

The special committee was created in May 2014 to investigate the terrorist attacks at the U.S. compound in eastern Libya where four Americans died, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens.

In June, the Benghazi Committee report was endorsed by the Republican committee members but not the Democrats. It severely criticized military, CIA and Obama administration officials for their response as the attacks unfolded and their subsequent explanations to the American people. It accused the government of incompetence at various levels, including a failure to deploy needed military assets, CIA intelligence reports that were “rife with errors,” and misguided planning even in the midst of the violence. The report did not single out wrongdoing by then-secretary of State Hillary Clinton, although some Republicans on the panel alleged that overall concern for her political future influenced and hampered some of the decision-making surrounding policy in Libya.

Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of State was revealed as part of the Benghazi investigation, but the committee did not investigate whether the setup led to improper handling of classified information. The FBI declined to pursue criminal charges regarding the email system, but it was a major issue in the 2016 presidential election.

Gowdy on Monday called the report the “final, definitive accounting” of the Benghazi attacks.

“The committee is proud to have been able to tell the story of the ingenuity and bravery displayed by our nation’s heroes in Benghazi, who banded together to save one another, when no other help was ever on the way,” Gowdy said.

Democrats contended all along that the committee was a political effort to taint Clinton, an allegation that got some traction when House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., told Fox News that because of the committee, "her numbers are dropping."

The panel’s top Democrat, Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, said Monday that the final report was a “desperate rehash.”

“Republicans voted on this partisan report five months ago, but delayed filing it and completing the committee until after the election,” Cummings said. “Republicans promised a process that was fair and bipartisan, but the American people got exactly the opposite.”


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on December 21, 2016, 08:41:46 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0RVxxZaF48


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on January 02, 2017, 07:53:22 pm
Federal Appeals Court Reinstates Clinton Email Lawsuits

A federal appeals court has ordered lawsuits by Judicial Watch and Cause of Action seeking to force the federal government to recover Hillary Clinton’s missing emails to move forward, reversing a lower court’s dismissal.

When Secretary of State John Kerry refused to take all lawful measures mandated by federal law to recover Clinton’s emails, Judicial Watch and Cause of Action brought separate lawsuits seeking to force Attorney General Loretta Lynch to launch a Justice Department investigation, a request that federal law says should have originated from Kerry or from the national archivist. A federal trial judge on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed these lawsuits, holding they were moot and no longer appropriate for judicial action.

On Dec. 27, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed, ordering the lower court to restart proceedings on the lawsuit. The panel included both liberal and conservative judges.

“The Federal Records Act governs the creation, management and disposal of federal records,” Senior Judge Stephen Williams wrote for the court, quoting a previous case. “Due to the importance of maintaining federal records (which are generally accessible to the public through the Freedom of Information Act), the act strictly limits the circumstances under which records can be removed from federal custody or destroyed.”

When a Cabinet officer becomes aware that the removal or destruction of federal records has happened or is imminent, he must notify the head of the National Archives, and then “initiate action through the Attorney General” to recover those records. Despite the Federal Records Act’s clear and unambiguous language, Kerry never did so.

D.C. Circuit precedent holds that the Federal Records Act commands Cabinet secretaries and the Archivist to pursue claims of missing or destroyed records, and does not allow any discretion on whether to do so. Another law—the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)—allows a person to sue over nonperformance of a federal agency action that federal law requires the agency to take. Judicial Watch and Cause of Action brought their suits under the authority of the APA.

rest: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/02/federal-appeals-court-reinstates-clinton-email-lawsuits/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on January 06, 2017, 06:17:00 pm
DNC Refused FBI Access to Its Servers … Instead Gave Access to a DNC Consultant Tied to Organization Promoting Russia Conflict

CNN reports:

The Democratic National Committee "rebuffed" a request from the FBI to examine its computer services after it was allegedly hacked by Russia during the 2016 election, a senior law enforcement official told CNN Thursday.
 
"The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated," a senior law enforcement official told CNN. "This left the FBI no choice but to rely upon a third party for information.
 
***
 
The FBI instead relied on the assessment from a third-party security company called CrowdStrike.
As first reported by George Eliason, CrowdStrike's Chief Technology Officer and Co-Founder Dimitri Alperovitch - who wrote the CrowdStrike reports allegedly linking Russia to the Democratic party emails published by Wikileaks - is a fellow at the Atlantic Council ... an organization associated with Ukraine, and whose main policy goal seems to stir up a confrontation with Russia.[1]

The Nation writes:

In late December, Crowdstrike released a largely debunked report claiming that the same Russian malware that was used to hack the DNC has been used by Russian intelligence to target Ukrainian artillery positions. Crowdstrike’s co-founder and chief technology officer, Dmitri Alperovitch, told PBS, “Ukraine’s artillery men were targeted by the same hackers…that targeted DNC, but this time they were targeting cellphones [belonging to the Ukrainian artillery men] to try to understand their location so that the Russian artillery forces can actually target them in the open battle.”
Dmitri Alperovitch is also a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council.
 
The connection between Alperovitch and the Atlantic Council has gone largely unremarked upon, but it is relevant given that the Atlantic Council—which is funded in part by the US State Department, NATO, the governments of Latvia and Lithuania, the Ukrainian World Congress, and the Ukrainian oligarch Victor Pinchuk—has been among the loudest voices calling for a new Cold War with Russia. As I pointed out in the pages of The Nation in November, the Atlantic Council has spent the past several years producing some of the most virulent specimens of the new Cold War propaganda.
 
It would seem then that a healthy amount of skepticism toward a government report that relied, in part, on the findings of private-sector cyber security companies like Crowdstrike might be in order.
The Atlantic Council is also funded by the U.S. military and the largest defense contractors, including:

United States Army
United States Navy
United States Air Force
United States Marines
Lockheed Martin
Raytheon
Northrop Grumman
Boeing

[1]  Here's an example of the Atlantic Council's bellicose rhetoric from July 2016:


Poland should announce that it reserves the right to deploy offensive cyber operations (and not necessarily in response just to cyber attacks).  The authorities could also suggest potential targets, which could include the Moscow metro, the St. Petersburg power network, and Russian state-run media outlets such as RT.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-06/dnc-refused-fbi-access-its-servers-%E2%80%A6-instead-gave-access-dnc-consultant-tied-organiz


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on January 12, 2017, 05:57:19 pm
DOJ Watchdog To Investigate FBI’s Handling Of Hillary Email Probe

The Justice Department — including the FBI — will be investigated by its own internal watchdog, the inspector general, for their actions during the 2016 presidential election, it was announced Thursday.

The New York Post reported

Inspector General Michael Horowitz announced that the investigation would also review FBI Director James Comey’s decision to disclose that the FBI was recommending against prosecuting Clinton for her private e-mail server and then revealing days before the election that more emails had been found on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner.

Clinton and her aides blame Comey for her narrow loss to Donald Trump.

The inspector general will also also investigate whether an FBI deputy director whose wife received financial support in her state election from a close Clinton ally should have been involved in the election and whether the Department of Justice’s assistant attorney general, who was close to Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, should have been recused from matters.

Additionally, Horowitz will looking “Allegations that Department and FBI employees improperly disclosed non-public information” and allegations that the FBI improperly released information that may have interfered in the election.

The FBI is part of the Department of Justice.

Former Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon called the move “Entirely appropriate and very necessary, but also not surprising” in an interview on MSNBC.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/01/breaking-doj-watchdog-investigate-fbis-handling-hillary-email-probe/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on January 16, 2017, 08:08:50 pm
Clinton Foundation Laying Off Staffers as It Shuts Down Clinton Global Initiative  :D

The layoffs will take place April 15 as part of a plan to offset criticism of the alleged pay-for-play schemes during Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State, according to a Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act notice the Clinton Foundation filed with the New York Department of Labor Thursday.

The layoffs were announced internally back in September leading up to the general election, Politico reported.

Employees had already started to look for or accept other positions at the time when the future of the organization was in doubt. It is not immediately clear how much of the staff will remain at the Clinton Foundation working in some other capacity.

Peter Schweizer, Breitbart News’ editor at large and author of the book Clinton Cash, predicted the foundation would implode before the organization announced its layoffs.

In Clinton Cash, Schweizer detailed how the foundation functioned as a pay-to-play system where it accepted donations from registered lobbyists, corporations, and foreign governments while Hillary Clinton used her authority as Secretary of State to grant favors to the foundation’s benefactors.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2017/01/15/clinton-foundation-laying-off-staffers-shuts-clinton-global-initiative/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on February 03, 2017, 08:03:43 pm
In Wake of Hillary's Loss, the Clinton Foundation Is Collapsing

Apparently, all good money-laundering schemes must eventually come to an end. Especially when your big donors figure out they were played for suckers all along, and your partners in crime realize that further bribery is essentially pointless:

    The Clinton Foundation is shedding two of its most politically problematic programs, while Bill Clinton is asking for supporters' advice on where to take his family's charity arm next. Being spun into separate entities are the foundation's initiatives in the country of Haiti, along with the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership, named after a billionaire backer of the couple.

    Additionally, the Clinton Global Initiative, the annual meet-and-greet in New York City between celebrities, rock stars, activists, dignitaries and Clintons, officially closed up shop in recent weeks. In an interview with the New York Times, Clinton Foundation President Donna Shalala admitted that donations dropped thanks to the political climate of last year.

    'Last year was a tough year,' she admitted, 'because people were beating on us with nonsense.'

Does that "nonsense" include a stinging defeat in the Electoral College, charges of rampant corruption, an FBI investigation, hacked emails, face-planting into a van, forgetting to campaign in Wisconsin, and general incompetence by the Smartest Woman in the World?

    Bill Clinton's letter, which was included in the foundation's annual report this week, struck a defiant tone.   The Clinton Foundation's president said one of the reasons revenue was down was because top Clinton talent, like daughter Chelsea (center) didn't have time to fund-raise.

    'In 2016, despite the political season and unprecedented attacks that were misleading or outright false, the Clinton Foundation continued its good work in the United States and around the world,' Bill Clinton wrote at one point. In another he said, 'he attacks on our efforts have not come from people and organizations who understand or care about the work we do.'

    The ex-president articulated that 'two of our most successful programs' would transition outside the Clinton Foundation umbrella. The couple's relationship with Haiti was complicated as some blamed their efforts for the island nation's sluggish recovery after the 2010 earthquake, while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state and her husband served as a U.N. envoy.

     Like the broader pay-to-play attacks on the Clinton Foundation opponents accused the Hillary Clinton's State Department with giving Clinton Foundation donors first dibs on Haitian relief projects.

Do the Clintons sense further trouble coming? Their relationship with Frank Giustra has a certain familiar redolence about it:

    Giustra has since committed more than $100 million to the work of the Clinton Foundation, becoming one of the largest individual donors to the family’s charities.

    Clinton has also gained regular transportation, borrowing Giustra’s plane 26 times for foundation business since 2005, including 13 trips in which the two men traveled together. The numbers on Clinton’s use of the plane, never previously reported, were provided by a spokeswoman for Giustra.

    The relationship has gained attention as Hillary Rodham Clinton has launched her presidential campaign amid questions about whether the Clinton Foundation has served as an avenue for wealthy interests to gain entree to a powerful family.

    Giustra, 57, a Vancouver, B.C.-based mogul whose eclectic business interests include founding Lionsgate Entertainment and investing in gold mines and an olive oil company, has come to symbolize a relatively new but substantial category of Clinton backers: foreign donors who are not legally eligible to contribute to U.S. political candidates but grew close to the Clintons through the charity.


https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/02/03/in-wake-of-hillarys-loss-the-clinton-foundation-collapse-continues/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on March 14, 2017, 08:47:51 pm
ooops

UH-OH: Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Team Did Meet With Russian Ambassador, Says Kremlin

Hillary Clinton’s team members met with the Russian ambassador during the election as well as Donald Trump’s, the Kremlin spokesman has alleged, as he set out to dismiss the “hysteria” surrounding Mr Trump’s links to Russia.

Hillary Clinton’s team members met with the Russian ambassador during the election as well as Donald Trump’s, the Kremlin spokesman has alleged, as he set out to dismiss the “hysteria” surrounding Mr Trump’s links to Russia.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Well, as it turns out, Russia is now saying that members of Hillary Clinton’s campaign team met with the Russian ambassador while the campaign was going on. So if simply meeting with Russia is a “criminal offense” then Crooked Hillary and her entire team is guilty as charged. Your move, fake news media.

The house intelligence committee will hold its first session on Russia on March 20, with the heads of the FBI, national security agency and CIA expected to appear, plus previous intelligence chiefs.

But Dmitry Peskov, the press secretary for Vladimir Putin, said on Sunday that America was “self-humiliating” in insisting that Russia hacked its election.
Russian Official: Russian Ambassador Met With Advisers To Hillary Clinton Too

https://youtu.be/I4OBQysYrOU

And he defended the actions of their ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, whose meeting with Michael Flynn, Mr Trump’s choice of national security adviser, caused Mr Flynn to lose his job. He was fired after just 24 days when it became clear that he had lied about meeting the Russian, and misled the vice president.

“This is his job,” said Mr Peskov, speaking on CNN’s Sunday morning politics show. “He was talking about bilateral relations, about what is going on in the United States, so we have a better understanding in Moscow.

“This is what happens all around the world.”
He said that members of Mrs Clinton’s team had also met with Mr Kislyak, although he did not give specifics.

“Well, if you look at some people connected with Hillary Clinton during her campaign, you would probably see that he had lots of meetings of that kind,” he said. “There are lots of specialists in politology, people working in think tanks advising Hillary or advising people working for Hillary.”

 Mrs Clinton’s team is yet to comment on the allegations. source

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/uh-oh-hillary-clintons-campaign-team-meet-russian-ambassador-says-kremlin/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on March 17, 2017, 11:21:25 pm
Brazile admits she forwarded town hall questions to Clinton camp

Former interim Democratic National Committee Chair Donna Brazile admitted Friday that she forwarded Democratic primary town hall questions to members of Hillary Clinton's campaign – something she had previously denied.

In an essay for Time published Friday, called “Russian DNC Narrative Played Out Exactly As They Hoped,” the Democratic strategist said she had in fact passed on topics, despite saying she had not when her communications with the campaign were leaked by WikiLeaks in October.

“[ I]n October, a subsequent release of emails revealed that among the many things I did in my role as a Democratic operative and D.N.C. Vice Chair prior to assuming the interim D.N.C. Chair position was to share potential town hall topics with the Clinton campaign,” she wrote.

In October, emails from Clinton campaign Chair John Podesta's account were released by WikiLeaks showing that Brazile – then a CNN contributor – had forwarded questions ahead of a March primary debate.

In one email, Brazile told Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri, “One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,” the night before a March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Michigan.

“Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint,” Brazile wrote.

The following night, a question along those lines was posed to both Clinton and her primary rival Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-Vt.

In another email, dated Mar. 12, she passed on to Palmieri a question on the death penalty set to be asked in a Mar. 13 town hall and said: “From time to time I get the questions in advance.” After Palmieri responded, Brazile wrote back: “I’ll send a few more.”

However, in an interview with Fox News on Oct. 19, Brazile denied helping Clinton during the primaries. She said she was being persecuted and questioned the credibility of the hacked files.

“As a Christian woman, I understand persecution, but I will not sit here and be persecuted,” Brazile said. “Your information is totally false.”

CNN would go on to sever ties with Brazile after the emails were leaked.

In the essay, Brazile said she will “forever regret” the decision to leak the questions to the Clinton campaign.

“My job was to make all our Democratic candidates look good, and I worked closely with both campaigns to make that happen. But sending those emails was a mistake I will forever regret,” she wrote.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/17/brazile-admits-forwarded-debate-questions-to-clinton-camp.html


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on April 20, 2017, 05:23:49 pm
CIA, FBI Admit it Wasn’t the Russians Who Leaked Docs to Wikileaks, Launch Manhunt For ‘Insider’

The CIA and FBI have pivoted from their Russian narrative as they admit that perhaps a traitor on the inside leaked docs to Wikileaks rather than the ‘Russians hacked and leaked’.

Pompeo recently stated:

“It is time to call out WikiLeaks for what it really is: A non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like Russia.”

It looks like Julian Assange was right again. He has repeatedly stated that the Russians were not being the DNC leaks nor the recent ‘Vault 7’ document drop which embarrassed the CIA by delivering punishing rounds of leaks. The CIA is finally admitting it wasn’t the Russians as they launch a manhunt for an insider who leaked the documents.

CBS reports:

CBS News has learned that a manhunt is underway for a traitor inside the Central Intelligence Agency.

The CIA and FBI are conducting a joint investigation into one of the worst security breaches in CIA history, which exposed thousands of top-secret documents that described CIA tools used to penetrate smartphones, smart televisions and computer systems.

Sources familiar with the investigation say it is looking for an insider — either a CIA employee or contractor — who had physical access to the material. The agency has not said publicly when the material was taken or how it was stolen.

Much of the material was classified and stored in a highly secure section of the intelligence agency, but sources say hundreds of people would have had access to the material. Investigators are going through those names.

Wikileaks has actually admitted that they have received leaks from insiders and NOT Russian hackers yet the media has repeatedly ignored this because it doesn’t fit their ‘Russian hacking’ narrative.

WikiLeaks has said it obtained the CIA information from former contractors who worked for U.S. intelligence. The CIA has not commented on the authenticity of the WikiLeaks disclosures or on the status of the investigation.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/cia-fbi-admit-wasnt-russians-leaked-docs-wikileaks-launch-manhunt-insider/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on April 24, 2017, 08:16:46 pm
Loretta Lynch OUTED in Front of Nation - and It All Points Back to the Hillary Investigation... | John Hawkins' Right Wing News

James Comey did have reasons for approaching Hillary’s email scandal the way he did and they all involved Loretta Lynch, it would seem. He didn’t trust her or other Obama officials at the Justice Department. He was afraid they would cover up for the Hildabeast, which they did. I believe Comey… partially. In the end, he tried to please both sides and wound up being hated all the way around. He should have just done the right thing. I also believe him when he says he distrusted the DOJ, but I think he also feared them and Hillary being elected.

The New York Times wrote this weekend on Comey’s go-it-alone strategy. That arose from events such as Lynch and Bill Clinton meeting on her airplane and then lying about what they discussed. Lynch also requested that Comey’s office not refer to Clinton’s email scandal as an ‘investigation’, but as a ‘matter’. Words have meaning and the Obama administration was a master at manipulating them for their benefit. This was an issue just as Hillary would not refer to it as a ‘criminal investigation’, but insisted it was a ‘security review’.

From The Hill:

    FBI Director James Comey distrusted former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and senior officials at the Justice Department, believing they might provide Hillary Clinton with political cover over her email server, according to a new report published Saturday by The New York Times.

    The Times described Comey’s “go-it-alone strategy” in the Clinton probe as emerging largely from his suspicions that Lynch and others at Justice might seek to subtly downplay the Clinton investigation.

    As an example, the Times reported that Lynch, during a meeting in September 2015, called on Comey to use the word “matter” instead of “investigation” when publicly discussing the case, three people who attended the meeting told the Times.

    Lynch reportedly reasoned that the word “investigation” would raise a number of other questions. Furthermore, she argued that the department should maintain its policy of not confirming investigations.

While looking into Russian involvement, our intelligence agencies came across a document that greatly concerned them. It was both a memo and an email. It was written by a Democratic operative who expressed confidence that Lynch would keep the Clinton investigation from going too far, according to several former officials familiar with the document. That alone should get Lynch charged with collusion to cover up wrong doing by Clinton. But it won’t. Wonder who that operative was and what they know.

Comey should have requested at that point for Lynch to recuse herself from the case. But he didn’t. It was a tragic mistake. Comey may be giving excuses and reasons here why he did not trust Loretta Lynch or the DOJ, but in the end he dropped the ball as well and did not carry through with his duty in my opinion. This has the feel of Comey covering his rear as more and more of this comes to light. As John Hawkins indicates in his new book, ‘101 Things All Young Adults Should Know’, if you do something, own up to it. It’s called responsibility and it’s something that James Comey seems to not quite grasp.

http://rightwingnews.com/legal/loretta-lynch-outed-front-nation-points-back-hillary-investigation/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 24, 2017, 03:38:30 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GECxKjm31Y


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 05, 2017, 03:18:27 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGGVs8N9iME&t=0s


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on July 25, 2017, 04:38:13 pm

BREAKING: Wasserman-Schultz IT Staffer Imran Awan Arrested at Airport While Trying to Flee U.S.

Joshua Caplan Jul 25th, 2017 4:06 pm 32 Comments

Chad Pergram of Fox News tweeted a breaking report on Dem Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Pakistani IT staffer Imran Awan was arrested at Dulles airport while trying to flee the United States.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported the FBI seized smashed hardrives belonging to Imran Awan.
Is justice finally being served to the DNC? In an exclusive report by the Daily Caller reveals “FBI agents seized smashed computer hard drives from the home of Florida Democrat Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s information technology (IT) administrator.“


BREAKING: Wasserman-Schultz IT Staffer Imran Awan Arrested at Airport While Trying to Flee U.S.

Joshua Caplan Jul 25th, 2017 4:06 pm 32 Comments

Chad Pergram of Fox News tweeted a breaking report on Dem Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Pakistani IT staffer Imran Awan was arrested at Dulles airport while trying to flee the United States.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported the FBI seized smashed hardrives belonging to Imran Awan.
Is justice finally being served to the DNC? In an exclusive report by the Daily Caller reveals “FBI agents seized smashed computer hard drives from the home of Florida Democrat Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s information technology (IT) administrator.“

Daily Caller reports:

    Pakistani-born Imran Awan, long-time right-hand IT aide to the former Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairwoman, has since desperately tried to get the hard drives back, the individual told The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group.

    A high-level congressional source, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the probe, confirmed that the FBI has joined what Politico previously described as a Capitol Police criminal probe into “serious, potentially illegal, violations on the House IT network” by Imran and three of his relatives, who had access to the emails and files of the more than two dozen House Democrats who employed them on a part-time basis.

    Capitol Police have also seized computer equipment tied to the Florida lawmaker.

    Awan’s younger brothers, Abid and Jamal, his wife, Hina Alvi, and Rao Abbas, Imran’s best friend, are also under investigation. There have been no arrests in the case.

    There is also evidence of financial schemes that extend beyond the Capitol Police’s purview and may expand to Pakistan, where Imran spends significant portions of the year.

The Gateway Pundit has closely reported the story of the Awan brothers from the beginning. Below is all you need to know about who they are and what they were doing in Congress.

In an interesting turn of events, it appears that the Russians may have not been behind the hacks into the American political system after all. Meet the three men who are now the center of attention for the hacks: Brothers Abid, Imran, and Jamal Awan.


BREAKING: Wasserman-Schultz IT Staffer Imran Awan Arrested at Airport While Trying to Flee U.S.

Joshua Caplan Jul 25th, 2017 4:06 pm 32 Comments

Chad Pergram of Fox News tweeted a breaking report on Dem Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Pakistani IT staffer Imran Awan was arrested at Dulles airport while trying to flee the United States.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported the FBI seized smashed hardrives belonging to Imran Awan.
Is justice finally being served to the DNC? In an exclusive report by the Daily Caller reveals “FBI agents seized smashed computer hard drives from the home of Florida Democrat Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s information technology (IT) administrator.“

Daily Caller reports:

    Pakistani-born Imran Awan, long-time right-hand IT aide to the former Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairwoman, has since desperately tried to get the hard drives back, the individual told The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group.

    A high-level congressional source, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the probe, confirmed that the FBI has joined what Politico previously described as a Capitol Police criminal probe into “serious, potentially illegal, violations on the House IT network” by Imran and three of his relatives, who had access to the emails and files of the more than two dozen House Democrats who employed them on a part-time basis.

    Capitol Police have also seized computer equipment tied to the Florida lawmaker.

    Awan’s younger brothers, Abid and Jamal, his wife, Hina Alvi, and Rao Abbas, Imran’s best friend, are also under investigation. There have been no arrests in the case.

    There is also evidence of financial schemes that extend beyond the Capitol Police’s purview and may expand to Pakistan, where Imran spends significant portions of the year.

The Gateway Pundit has closely reported the story of the Awan brothers from the beginning. Below is all you need to know about who they are and what they were doing in Congress.

In an interesting turn of events, it appears that the Russians may have not been behind the hacks into the American political system after all. Meet the three men who are now the center of attention for the hacks: Brothers Abid, Imran, and Jamal Awan.

The Daily Caller News Foundation is reporting that three brothers who managed office IT for government officials have been relieved of their duties on suspicion that they accessed specific computer networks without permission, also known as hacking.

From The Daily Caller:

    Brothers Abid, Imran, and Jamal Awan were barred from computer networks at the House of Representatives Thursday, The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group has learned.

    Three members of the intelligence panel and five members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs were among the dozens of members who employed the suspects on a shared basis. The two committees deal with many of the nation’s most sensitive issues, information and documents, including those related to the war on terrorism.

The Daily Caller goes on to state that one of the possible computer systems that may have been hacked in connection to these three brothers belongs to Florida Democrat Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Schultz served as the chairman for the DNC when the now infamous DNC hacks took place during the 2016 presidential campaign. Many Democrats and media outlets reported for months, with little evidence, that the Russians were behind the hacks in a deliberate attempt to help President Trump win the election.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/07/breaking-wasserman-schultz-staffer-imran-awan-arrested-airport-trying-flee-u-s/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 08, 2017, 04:39:03 pm
Is Hillary Clinton Pursuing a Career in Ministry? Satan's new apostle

 The mother of a nine-year-old boy who requested a President Trump-themed birthday party says she was unable to find a bakery that would agree to make a cake for the party.

The Washington Times reports that White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders shared a letter from nine-year-old Dylan at a press briefing.

“Dear President Trump,” wrote the young boy, “My name [sic] Dylan but every body calls me pickle. I’m 9 years old and you are my favrit president. I like you so much I had a birthday about you. My cake was the shap of your hat. How old are you? How big is the white hose? Ho much monny do you have? I don’t now why people don’t like you. You seme nice can we be friends? My pitcher is in here so if you see me you can say hi. You friend Dylan.”

Dylan’s mother said her son admires the president so much that he requested a Trump-themed birthday party, but since she was unable to find a bakery that would agree to make a Trump-themed cake, she had to make the cake herself.

This, of course, brings to mind the Christian bakeries and other businesses that are under fire for refusing to bake cakes or provide other services for gay weddings. Many are questioning how this bakery declining to provide a Trump-themed birthday cake for a nine-year-old is any different than a bakery declining to provide a cake for a same-sex wedding.

Michael P. Farris, CEO of Alliance Defending Freedom, the organization defending Christian baker Jack Phillips, commented on this incident:

“Similarly here, cake shops declined Pickle’s order for conscience reasons. Yet, no one on the Left is calling for legal action against the cake shops. And neither should anyone on the Right.”

Farris continued, “The fact is that these cake shops have freedom of speech. They have the right to decline to use their artistic talents to celebrate events or promote messages that violate their beliefs, even if it offends a nice little kid.”

Phillips and other Christian business owners shouldn’t be treated differently, argued Farris.

http://www.christianheadlines.com/blog/is-hillary-clinton-pursuing-a-career-in-ministry.html


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 08, 2017, 04:42:15 pm
Hillary Clinton Considers Making Her Spirituality More Public: ‘She’d Make a Great Pastor’ at the church of Baal

(http://www.freesmfhosting.com/gallery/endtimesandcurrentevents/0/1_27_04_15_9_05_42.jpeg)
http://endtimesandcurrentevents.freesmfhosting.com/index.php/topic,11089.0.html

Hillary Clinton has written a foreword for a book inspired by devotionals that pastor Bill Shillady prepared for her during the presidential campaign, and she is considering speaking out more on a topic she has long held private: religion.

"Hillary Clinton wants to preach," begins a piece in The Atlantic by Emma Green, relaying a comment from Shillady. Clinton has been discussing going into ministry, and Shillady thinks the former first lady could definitely do what he does.

"Given her depth of knowledge of the Bible and her experience of caring for people and loving people, she'd make a great pastor," Shillady said.

Newsweek‘s Kenneth Woodward also broached this topic when he revealed that Clinton talked "all the time" about becoming an ordained minister in the 1990s. She asked Woodward not to divulge her secret, however.

"It will make me seem much too pious," she said about considering ordination.

Green argues such an attitude "perfectly captures Clinton's long campaign to modulate—and sometimes obscure—expressions of her faith." But Shillady and others consider Clinton's faith central to her public service and blamed critics for obscuring her faith.

"It's been there all along," Shillady said. "The general public didn't necessarily want to accept the fact that she's a Christian because there's so many critics out there about the Clintons."

"[Clinton] doesn't wear her religion on her sleeve, she just practices it," Shillady said. "She follows the edict of what's attributed to St. Francis: ‘Preach the gospel always, and if you need to, use words.'"  :D

Shillady's book, Strong for a Moment Like This, may be the start of a more public-facing spirituality for Clinton. Shillady is publishing the book after her suggestion and said it is free from concerns about image or politics.

Shillady prepared daily devotionals for Clinton from the start of her campaign, and he also partnered with over 100 female ministers who formed the group "We Pray With Her." Shillady holds that the book finds its center in spirituality and not politics, despite its origins in the campaign.

"It's an inspirational book," he said. "I do not believe that she encouraged me to write this book in any way to change the image of her. She really found [the devotionals] so helpful to her in the midst of the contentious campaign that she felt that people would find some hope … from it."

Still, Shillady gets in "subtle shots" at President Donald Trump and intends to respond to current events. Green wrote that some of those aspects of the book are intended to vindicate Clinton's spirituality as well as her political record.

Being out of politics, however, struck Shillady as the right path for Clinton.

"I think her faith is stronger," Shillady said about Clinton after the election. "I haven't noticed anything different, except that I think she is more relaxed than I've ever seen her."

http://freebeacon.com/culture/hillary-clinton-considers-making-spirituality-more-public-great-pastor/


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 08, 2017, 04:50:02 pm
Is Hillary Clinton Pursuing a Career in Ministry? Satan's new apostle

 The mother of a nine-year-old boy who requested a President Trump-themed birthday party says she was unable to find a bakery that would agree to make a cake for the party.

The Washington Times reports that White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders shared a letter from nine-year-old Dylan at a press briefing.

“Dear President Trump,” wrote the young boy, “My name [sic] Dylan but every body calls me pickle. I’m 9 years old and you are my favrit president. I like you so much I had a birthday about you. My cake was the shap of your hat. How old are you? How big is the white hose? Ho much monny do you have? I don’t now why people don’t like you. You seme nice can we be friends? My pitcher is in here so if you see me you can say hi. You friend Dylan.”

Dylan’s mother said her son admires the president so much that he requested a Trump-themed birthday party, but since she was unable to find a bakery that would agree to make a Trump-themed cake, she had to make the cake herself.

This, of course, brings to mind the Christian bakeries and other businesses that are under fire for refusing to bake cakes or provide other services for gay weddings. Many are questioning how this bakery declining to provide a Trump-themed birthday cake for a nine-year-old is any different than a bakery declining to provide a cake for a same-sex wedding.

Michael P. Farris, CEO of Alliance Defending Freedom, the organization defending Christian baker Jack Phillips, commented on this incident:

“Similarly here, cake shops declined Pickle’s order for conscience reasons. Yet, no one on the Left is calling for legal action against the cake shops. And neither should anyone on the Right.”

Farris continued, “The fact is that these cake shops have freedom of speech. They have the right to decline to use their artistic talents to celebrate events or promote messages that violate their beliefs, even if it offends a nice little kid.”

Phillips and other Christian business owners shouldn’t be treated differently, argued Farris.

http://www.christianheadlines.com/blog/is-hillary-clinton-pursuing-a-career-in-ministry.html

The content of the article posted is the one underneath (would have made the same mistake myself). Here's the article...

Former Secretary of State and 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is reportedly considering going into the ministry and becoming a pastor.

This may come as a surprise to many since, as RelevantMagazine.com notes, Clinton is widely perceived as not being religious.

Nevertheless, she has a long history of being involved in the Methodist Church. She has reportedly been considering a career in the ministry for more than 20 years.

A recent article in The Atlantic revealed that, although Clinton may have attempted to obscure her faith ties during her political career, in this new phase of life after her tough defeat in the 2016 presidential race, faith may play a central role.

The subject of Clinton’s interest in becoming a Methodist minister was revisited as Clinton’s longtime pastor Bill Shillady is set to release a new book about the daily devotionals he sent her during her 2016 presidential bid. The book is titled Strong for a Moment Like This.

In the book, Shillady explores why Clinton is often viewed as anti-religious, but also examines what Shillady believes is her strong commitment to her Christian faith.

“The general public didn’t necessarily want to accept the fact that she’s a Christian because there’s so many critics out there about the Clintons,” said Shillady.

He also said he believes Clinton would “make a great pastor” and suggested that, although she may not become officially ordained, she may be involved in guest preaching as a lay minister.

 

Photo courtesy: Flickr.com

Publication date: August 8, 2017


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 15, 2017, 02:55:49 pm
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/no-surprise-learned-new-hillary-clinton-devotional-prayer-book-based-plagiarized-material/
No Surprise As It’s Learned New Hillary Clinton Daily Devotional Prayer Book Based On Plagiarized Material
The Rev. Bill Shillady said in a statement he was "stunned" to learn that his devotional, "Sunday is Coming" was so similar to an earlier blog post by the Rev. Matt Deuel of Mission Point Community Church in Warsaw, Indiana. Shillady said he has apologized to Deuel and will credit the Indiana pastor in future editions of the book, titled "Strong for a Moment Like This: The Daily Devotions of Hillary Rodham Clinton."

8/15/17

Hillary Clinton’s pastor has acknowledged he plagiarized part of the prayer commentary he sent her the day after she lost the presidential election, a devotional that is at the heart of a book he published Tuesday.

“Ye shall not steal, neither deal falsely, neither lie one to another.” Leviticus 19:11 (KJV)

EDITOR’S NOTE: What would be a really crazy idea for a book? A diet book from Mama Cass, or maybe a Guide To Rational Thinking by Kim Jong-Un? Wait, no, I got it. How about a “daily devotional” prayer book comprised of the prayers prayed by Hillary Clinton! And, of course, since this is Hillary’s book of “prayers”, the main one the book is based on should absolutely be “borrowed” from somebody else. Preach it, sister!

The Rev. Bill Shillady said in a statement he was “stunned” to learn that his devotional, “Sunday is Coming” was so similar to an earlier blog post by the Rev. Matt Deuel of Mission Point Community Church in Warsaw, Indiana. Shillady said he has apologized to Deuel and will credit the Indiana pastor in future editions of the book, titled “Strong for a Moment Like This: The Daily Devotions of Hillary Rodham Clinton.”

The book is a collection of some of the Scripture, devotionals and inspirational writing that Shillady, a United Methodist Church minister, emailed to Clinton, a lifelong Methodist, during the campaign.

Mary Catherine Dean, editor-in-chief of Shillady’s publisher, Abingdon Press, said in a statement, “We fully accept his explanation that he did not intentionally leave Matt Deuel’s passages unattributed.”
Hillary Clinton Preaching Sermon Entitled ‘I Don’t Feel No Ways Tired’ Selma, Alabama:

Click here to watch “pastor” HIllary Clinton preaching up a storm in Alabama.

Deuel said he noticed the similarities when CNN published the devotional last week. Deuel said in an email that he spoke with Shillady on Monday and accepted the Methodist minister’s apology.

Shillady leads the United Methodist City Society, a social service agency in New York. He officiated at Chelsea Clinton’s wedding, led a memorial service for Hillary Clinton’s mother, Dorothy Rodham, and gave the closing benediction at the Democratic National Convention. Clinton wrote the forward to his book.

Shillady said he sought inspiration for the Nov. 9 email by searching for material along the familiar Christian theme of holding onto hope and emerging from adversity.

“I searched for passages that offered perspective of this theme. I am now stunned to realize the similarity between Matt Deuel’s blog sermon and my own. Clearly, portions of my devotional that day incorporate his exact words,” Shillady said in a statement.

Shillady credited Deuel with graciously accepting the apology. “My entire approach to this book project has been to credit all of the many ministers and sources who contributed to the devotionals that were written for Hillary over the course of the campaign,” the Methodist minister said.

Clinton is scheduled to discuss the book with Shillady at a Sept. 7 event in New York. A representative for Clinton did not immediately respond to a request for comment. source


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 14, 2017, 08:46:58 pm
(http://media.sermonaudio.com/gallery/photos/CooleyJason-02.jpg)

http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=91417740492

The Spirit of Constant Conspiracy And Paranoia
9/14/2017 (THU)
Audio: http://mp3.sa-media.com/download/91417740492/91417740492.mp3


Title: Re: The Hillary Scandal's
Post by: Mark on August 20, 2018, 09:11:12 am
BREAKING: America First Media Names Public Officials at Hospital the Morning of Seth Rich Shooting

America First Media has brought forth new findings in their investigation into the 2016 homicide of DNC employee Seth Rich. An inside source with knowledge of what occurred at the hospital on the early morning of July 10, 2016 has revealed former DNC Chairperson Donna Brazile and DC Mayor Muriel Bowser arrived shortly after EMTs had delivered the injured victim for emergency treatment of two gunshot wounds to the torso.

https://af-mg.com/2018/08/19/breaking-america-first-media-names-public-officials-at-hospital-the-morning-of-seth-rich-shooting/