End Times and Current Events

General Category => War On Family => Topic started by: Mark on August 31, 2013, 11:14:15 am

Title: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on August 31, 2013, 11:14:15 am

The Kinsey Syndrome is must-viewing for anyone who cares about our rapidly declining culture. The film is central to the curriculum for "Sexual Behavior and the Law" -- a class I teach at Liberty University School of Law. As the documentary so masterfully illustrates, there is a pre-Kinsey and a post-Kinsey America. Unfortunately, we live in the latter. All our major elitist institutions: the courts; the media; academia; the entertainment industry and others -- have relied upon Kinsey's wholly discredited research to move America away from adherence to the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic, and toward a secular-humanist, morally relative worldview. The Kinsey Syndrome has helped to expose Alfred Kinsey and his life's work as pure fraud." Matt Barber, Associate Dean and Adjunct Law Professor, Liberty University School of Law
"The Bible tells us to expose the fruitless works of darkness. The documentary, The Kinsey Syndrome does just that in painstaking detail. Each chapter of this video documentary addresses a different aspect of the work of the pseudo-scientist Alfred Kinsey whose fraudulent data laid the cancerous foundation for sex education, perversion, pedophilia, pornography, and the corruption of our culture."

Dr. Ted Baehr, MOVIEGUIDE review
The work of Kinsey is currently being promoted by the homosexual community the fact is he believed that children were sexual beings and experimented by sexually abusing them. He went as far as raping babies and yet Hollywood glamorised his work in a film with Liam Neeson. The American government now officially call children sexual beings there are calls to rename pedeophiles "minor attracted" and to give them treatment programmes instead of jail. A recent doctor who was an advisor to the British Government was sacked when he released a report linking pedeophilia with homosexuality. An advisor to the Scottish government who was the head of the LGBT was jailed for raping a baby this caused the government great embarrassment..This is just the beginning it will soon be a hate crime to even suggest there is a link and it will be you facing jail while pedeophiles walk free to stalk children. Yet we sit silent as our children are being fed a sexual agenda by state schools and the media. Research the anti-defamation league they are the authors of all hate crime legislation they openly admit their hatred of Christianity and their wish to destroy the family unit. It is time to look at the facts stand up and speak the truth. Adults can do what they want in their private life it is none of our business but when they start trying to pollute innocent children's thinking then we must act. I am not saying only homosexuals are pedeophiles that would be a nonsense as there are examples of heterosexual pedeophiles. Only highlighting the facts that a link exists. True Christians should love their enemies and bless those who curse them and have compassion on the lost.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on August 31, 2013, 11:14:28 am
Obama: Sex Ed for Kindergartners ‘Is the Right Thing to Do’

The Chicago Public Schools this year are mandating that the district’s kindergarten classes include sex education, fulfilling a proposal President Barack Obama supported in 2003 when he served in the Illinois state senate and later defended when he ran for president in the 2008 election cycle.

At a Planned Parenthood convention at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Washington, D.C., on July 17, 2007, a teenage girl who said she worked as a sex-education “peer educator” in the D.C. public schools asked then-U.S. Sen. Obama what he would do to encourage the teaching of “medically accurate, age-appropriate, and responsible sex education.”

- See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-sex-ed-kindergartners-right-thing-do#sthash.tk5OQNvH.dpuf

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 31, 2013, 11:28:47 am
Saw Pinto's film a couple of years ago - very eyepopping, to say the least!

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on September 04, 2013, 07:03:47 am
Sex education for kindergarteners has only one agenda

The Chicago Public Schools are this year mandating that kindergartners receive sex education lessons. Opponents say it's a way of exposing them to the homosexual lifestyle.

The CEO of the Chicago Public Schools is emphasizing that this curriculum will be age appropriate. But Laurie Higgins of the Illinois Family Institute says that is misleading.

“What all the talk about is that from the perspective of those on the left, there is virtually nothing that is considered inappropriate,” she points out. “But they believe that it’s appropriate to talk to kindergarteners about diverse family structures. And what that means is talking about families that are led by homosexuals.”

She says that sex education lessons for young students just beginning school are out of place.

“Five-year-olds are not sexual beings, except in the world of progressives,” she says. “They’re not thinking about sex, they’re not having sexual feelings. And so this is completely unnecessary, and parents are capable of handling this.”

She says parents of Chicago-area public school students should opt their children out of any lessons involving homosexuality or gender confusion.

- See more at: http://www.onenewsnow.com/education/2013/09/04/sex-education-for-kindergarteners-has-only-one-agenda#sthash.TvSPwAth.dpuf

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on September 04, 2013, 07:37:27 am
This is just a straight up product of Kinsey, i bet it will come out soon that this "judge" is a pedo also

It Seems the Former Teacher Who Received Just 30 Days in Prison for Raping Suicidal Teen Won’t Get Off That Easy

A Montana judge under fire for his comments about a 14-year-old victim in a schoolhouse **** case has ordered a new sentencing hearing for the former teacher who received just 30 days in prison for the crime.
In setting the hearing for Friday afternoon, District Judge G. Todd Baugh said Tuesday that state law appears to require a two-year mandatory minimum prison term for Stacey Rambold, 54, of Billings.
Rambold last week was sentenced to 15 years with all but 31 days suspended and a one-day credit given for time-served. He began serving his monthlong term last week at the state prison in Deer Lodge.
“In the Court’s opinion, imposing a sentence which suspends more than the mandatory minimum would be an illegal sentence,” Baugh wrote.

But in a strange twist, Yellowstone County Attorney Scott Twito said Baugh may lack authority to impose a longer sentence at this point. That’s because state law says an illegal sentence must be handled through the appeal process.
The judge has faced widespread condemnation from women’s rights activists, elected officials and others for the light sentence and for saying Rambold’s 14-year-old victim, Cherise Moralez, was “older than her chronological age” and asserting that she had some control over her months-long relationship with Rambold.
The judge later apologized for his comments, although activists who have called for him to resign said an apology is not enough.
Moralez killed herself before Rambold’s case came to trial. That left prosecutors without their main witness and led them to strike a deal with Rambold that allowed him to avoid prison until he violated the terms of his court-ordered release.

Court records show the sentence Baugh handed down was in line with what Rambold had requested.
Prosecutors, who had sought 20 years prison with 10 years suspended, already were considering an appeal, citing the two-year minimum requirement.
Twito said he planned to be in Baugh’s courtroom Friday but was unsure how the hearing might play out given that state law says illegal sentences must be addressed through an appeal.
“I’ve done this a long time and I’m in an area I have not been in before,” said Twito, now in his 16th year as a prosecutor.
If his reading of the law stands up, that could give the defendant the advantage in Friday’s hearing.
Twito said members of his office, along with Rambold’s defense attorney, Jay Lansing, met informally with Baugh last week to discuss the case.
Baugh said in Tuesday’s order that the defendant’s presentencing memorandum claimed the minimum mandatory for sexual intercourse without consent was 30 days, and the state did not object until after the sentence was handed down.
Lansing could not be immediately reached for comment Tuesday.
Twito said his office will continue to pursue a possible appeal if the sentence remains unchanged. A final decision would be made in conjunction with the appellate division of the Montana attorney general’s office.
Hundreds of protesters rallied outside the Yellowstone County Court House last week to call for Baugh’s resignation. News of Friday’s hearing in the case did little to sway those critics.

“The judge cannot take back the words he said when he blamed the victim. As far as we’re concerned, Judge Baugh has lost the trust of this community,” said Eran Thompson with Not in Our Town, a Billings group that promotes diversity and works against hate crimes.
The 71-year-old judge was first elected to the bench in 1984 and has been re-elected every six years since without an opponent. He’s up for re-election in 2014.
Baugh said in response to the criticism that Rambold’s sentence was based on the defendant’s violation of an earlier deal he made with prosecutors, rather than the original crime. He also claimed that his remarks about Moralez were “irrelevant” and did not factor into his sentence.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 04, 2013, 10:26:57 am
Yeah, the sodomy agenda didn't exactly happen overnight(meaning it didn't exactly come about during the Clinton/Obama years, like the "religious right" wants to make you to believe) - it started a LONG time ago with the "sexual revolution"(among other things).

IOW, how can anyone expose gay marriage, but en yet the lost world has no problems with fornication and cohabitations(heterosexuals outside of marriage, that is)? Yeah, get the beam out of your own eye first!

Sex education for kindergarteners has only one agenda

The Chicago Public Schools are this year mandating that kindergartners receive sex education lessons. Opponents say it's a way of exposing them to the homosexual lifestyle.

The CEO of the Chicago Public Schools is emphasizing that this curriculum will be age appropriate. But Laurie Higgins of the Illinois Family Institute says that is misleading.

“What all the talk about is that from the perspective of those on the left, there is virtually nothing that is considered inappropriate,” she points out. “But they believe that it’s appropriate to talk to kindergarteners about diverse family structures. And what that means is talking about families that are led by homosexuals.”

She says that sex education lessons for young students just beginning school are out of place.

“Five-year-olds are not sexual beings, except in the world of progressives,” she says. “They’re not thinking about sex, they’re not having sexual feelings. And so this is completely unnecessary, and parents are capable of handling this.”

She says parents of Chicago-area public school students should opt their children out of any lessons involving homosexuality or gender confusion.

- See more at: http://www.onenewsnow.com/education/2013/09/04/sex-education-for-kindergarteners-has-only-one-agenda#sthash.TvSPwAth.dpuf

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on September 07, 2013, 11:39:51 am
‘We Like Them Young:’ Video of University Students’ Chant About Sex With Minors Incites Outrage

 A online video capturing Canadian university students happily chanting about male classmates engaging in sexual activity with minors has incited outrage from viewers worldwide.

The chant, which has reportedly been used for the past five years at Saint Mary’s University (SMU) in Halifax, Nova Scotia, recently surfaced on YouTube and other outlets, where it has produced both shock and anger.

“SMU boys, we like them young,” the chant begins as the students then proceed to turn the word “young” into an acronym. “Y is for your sister. O is for oh-so-tight. U is for underage. N is for no consent. G is for grab that [expletive].”

Officials at the school state that the incident occurred on Labor Day at an event called “Turf Burn,” which serves as a welcome for freshman during frosh week.

“We were horrified. We couldn’t believe that this was happening on our campus,” Steve Proctor, communications manager for SMU, told Global News Canada. “It was wholly unacceptable.”

He stated that he immediately set up a meeting with the student group that organized the event to express concern. Proctor, who said that he was initially angered by the footage, told reporters that he believes the students didn’t realize what they were saying.

“I don’t believe that there was anyone in the group that understood what they were doing,” he stated. “[T]here were people who were crying when they realized exactly what they had done. … There was no malice involved. They just got caught up in a thing.”
Connect with Christian News

However, student Jeannie Denyes disagrees that her classmates were unaware of the meaning of the chant. She said that she considered leaving the university after learning of the incident.

“I cried for three hours last night after I saw this. I am a **** survivor. I have been affected by sexual violence against underaged minors,” she told CBC News. “As a Saint Mary’s student, I don’t feel this is entertainment. I don’t feel this is something they didn’t know better than to say.”

Proctor said that officials asked students how the matter could be rectified, and they suggested that all 80 student leaders be mandated to enroll in sensitivity training classes and also attend an upcoming sexual assault conference at St. Francis Xavier University. At this time, no other disciplinary action will be taken, but university President Colin Dodds said in a statement this week that he is taking “measures to ensure it does not happen in the future.”

“I accept that I and the university administration have a role to oversee and guide student leaders,” he said. “We failed in that responsibility.”

Viewers throughout the nation have likewise expressed outrage.

“I’m surprised that this chant has been used for years and it’s taken ’til now for the university and students to realize it’s inappropriate,” commented one viewer with the screen name Dolphindoll. ”I would tend to think the only reason that it has been deemed wrong now is because a video was made and released, causing it to be seen publicly. Otherwise, the practice of using it would have likely gone on for many more years.”

“I don’t know what’s more awful: the guys cheering it or the girls beside them laughing,” added another named Chrissie. “Definitely not cool. Get some integrity. You are in university; act like it.”



Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 07, 2013, 12:02:10 pm
We Like Them Young:’ Video of University Students’ Chant About Sex With Minors Incites Outrage

 A online video capturing Canadian university students happily chanting about male classmates engaging in sexual activity with minors has incited outrage from viewers worldwide.

The chant, which has reportedly been used for the past five years at Saint Mary’s University (SMU) in Halifax, Nova Scotia, recently surfaced on YouTube and other outlets, where it has produced both shock and anger.

From a Catholic University they're doing so? No surprise here, I guess. I wonder if Life Site News is going to make a big fuss over this! ::)

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on September 20, 2013, 10:33:51 am
Atheist Richard Dawkins Stirs Outrage: ‘Light Pedophilia’ Didn’t Cause Me ‘Lasting Damage’

A prominent atheist has stirred international outage following his comments regarding children who are victims of ‘light pedophilia.’
Richard Dawkins, known for his book The God Delusion, was recently featured in an interview in The Times, during which he spoke of his own sexual abuse as a child, which he said had no long-lasting affect upon his life.
“One day – I must have been about 11 – there was a master in the gallery with me. He pulled me onto his knee and put his hand inside my shorts. He did no more than have a little feel, but it was extremely disagreeable … as well as embarrassing,” he told the publication. “As soon as I could wriggle off his lap, I ran to tell my friends, many of whom had had the same experience with him. I don’t think he did any of us any lasting damage, but some years later he killed himself.”
However, when Dawkins shared his thoughts about degrees of pedophilia, the changing times and not treating all types of inappropriate touching alike, readers expressed shock and disappointment.

“I am very conscious that you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours,”"Just as we don’t look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism, I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild pedophilia, and can’t find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today.”
“[T]he most notorious cases of pedophilia involve **** and even murder, and because we attach the label ‘pedophilia’ to the same things when they’re just mild touching up, we must beware of lumping all pedophiles into the same bracket,” Dawkins opined.
On Tuesday, Dawkins took to Twitter in an attempt to clarify his remarks

“‘Mild touching up’ is bad,” he wrote. “Raping [an] 8-year-old wife to death is worse. Worse? That’s putting it mildly. Quantitative judgment vs. black/white.”
“Is anyone seriously denying that raping an 8-year-old to death is worse than putting a hand inside a child’s clothes?” he wrote again later. “Are you that absolute?”
On Thursday, Dawkins also penned an article explaining his words.
“To excuse pedophiliac assaults in general, or to make light of the horrific experiences of others, was a thousand miles from my intention,” he wrote. “I cannot know for certain that my companions’ experiences with the same teacher were are brief as mine, and theirs may have been recurrent where mine was not.”

“If I am wrong about any particular individual; if any of my companions really was traumatized by the abuse long after it happened; if, perhaps it happened many times and amounted to more than the single disagreeable but brief fondling that I endured, I apologize,” Dawkins said.
However, a number of child protection groups remain outraged at Dawkins’ comments. Peter Watt of the National Society of the Prevention of Cruelty to Children said that the atheist’s remarks slighted others who have suffered from the memories of their abuse.
“Mr. Dawkins seems to think that because a crime was committed a long time ago we should judge it in a different way,” he told Religion News Service. “But we know that the victims of sexual abuse suffer the same effects whether it was 50 years ago or yesterday.”


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 20, 2013, 12:45:03 pm
It seems like what these God-hating reprobates have in common is pedophilia. Former Freemasons that converted to Christians have said how when they were masons, they had these sexual thoughts over young boys.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on September 28, 2013, 06:54:59 am
Chinese Police Rescue 92 Kidnapped Children

China's state media say police have rescued 92 children and two women who were kidnapped to be sold by a human trafficking gang.


China's state media say police have rescued 92 children and two women who were kidnapped to be sold by a human trafficking gang.
Xinhua said Friday authorities have arrested 301 suspects in connection with the case.
Officials say police from eleven provinces were involved in the operation to break up the massive trafficking network that stole and bought children in Yunnan and Sichuan provinces to be sold in other regions.
Child abduction is a major problem in China. A strict one-child policy and a traditional preference for boys have contributed to a rise in the trafficking of children and women in recent years.
The U.S. State Department downgraded China this year to rank among the world's worst human traffickers. The 2013 Trafficking in Persons Report found that although Beijing has created better awareness of the danger of human trafficking, authorities are still not making significant efforts to tackle the problem.
Estimates put the number of children lost every year in China to trafficking at 200,000. Only 0.1 percent of trafficked children are found and returned to their families.
Four years ago, the Chinese Ministry of Public Security launched a nationwide anti-trafficking campaign and started creating a nationwide DNA database to help with investigations.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on October 11, 2013, 08:45:47 am
Parents warned about **** in schools
Teachers may introduce profiles from 'LGBT History' month campaign

President Obama already has declared June to be homosexual “Pride” month, but “gay” activists now are designating October “LGBT History Month.”
The move has prompted a pro-family organization in California to issue a warning to parents across the United States about the possibility their children would be confronted with explicit pornography in their public schools this month.

Teachers, they explain, could introduce material that promotes homosexuality.
The homosexual-rights group Equality Forum, which is promoting LGBT History Month, is profiling various homosexuals and lesbians for each day of the month, including some whose work can accurately be described as triple-X rated.
Many schools plan to incorporate LGBT History Month into lessons.
“It is deeply disturbing that the organizers of LGBT History Month think our kids should be celebrating homoerotic authors and **** producers,” stated Brad Dacus, president of Pacific Justice Institute. “This should be a serious wake-up call for anyone who still thinks gay history in schools is a good idea.”
PJI has warned parents to take immediate action to prevent their children from being blindsided this month by “explicit and highly objectionable material.”
“A patchwork” of schools, districts and individual teachers nationwide are expected to promote LGBT History Month to students, PJI said.
On Oct. 18, Equality Forum will feature “Tom of Finland,” who has a foundation promoting his explicit sex images, “erotic art galleries” and “artist and museum links” that include explicit **** images.
Also featured, on the 10th, will be “Patrick Califia,” born a woman and now described as a “bisexual transman.”
The writer of a sex column, Califia also is known for erotic fiction.
Then there’s the role model of the late Axel Axgil, a Danish advocate for homosexuals who was convicted on pornography charges for selling pictures of **** men.
And there’s Simon Nkoli, who promoted homosexuality in South Africa and at one point was jailed on claims he killed a man by throwing a rock during a protest. The charges eventually were dropped.
“Many parents will no doubt be alarmed when they see some of the characters being highlighted this year,” PJI’s statement said.
The group is urging parents to ask their children’s teachers whether there will be any reference to LGBT History Month.
“If so, parents should confront the teacher, principal and school board members with the reality of the individuals being presented as role models this year,” PJI said.
“Besides the X-rated inclusions, this year’s list continues a trend from previous years of including a drag queen, current television personalities, foreign political figures, and activists. The list also appears to be more targeted this year at ethnic and religious groups that have traditionally opposed homosexual behavior, highlighting several black and Asian LGBT figures, as well as a former Mormon,” the group said.
“This is exactly why we fought California’s gay history mandate a couple of years ago,” noted PJI Staff Attorney Matthew McReynolds. “We knew this was not about real history; it was about pushing a political agenda and sexualizing kids at increasingly young ages. It is completely irresponsible for the organizers of this event to promote individuals whose work is utterly inappropriate for minors.”
The institute said school districts from California to Florida have adopted LGBT History Month. Two years ago in New Jersey, it created controversy for Republican Gov. Chris Christie when he suggested a teacher should be fired for posting objections to it on her personal Facebook page.
California’s latest sex indoctrination law requires schools to allow students to choose which gender they prefer.
Karen England of Capitol Resource Institute said her group is working on a newly launched initiative to overturn the law that will need the signatures of some 500,000 voters.
The goal is to veto the “extremist” language adopted by majority Democrats in the state legislature and signed by Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown that opens public school locker rooms to students of either sex.
Apparently, students will only need to tell school officials which gender they feel like. England affirmed that the law has no provision for certifying that someone is gender-disoriented or gender-confused before being given the rights provided in the new law.
See what’s going on at PrivacyforallStudents.com.
England said parents in other states also should be concerned.
“We’re not like Las Vegas. What happens in California spreads to other states,” she said.
The law, AB 1266, adopted during this year’s legislative session, provides that students be given access to gender-segregated facilities according to their “gender identity.” It’s the latest in a long list of sex indoctrination laws adopted in California, including one that requires a day of recognition for Harvey Milk, the homosexual politician who also was an advocate of infamous cult leader Jim Jones.
English told WND the law is a direct assault on parental rights, because it allows schools to treat their children as members of either gender, lets them send them to locker rooms or restrooms that may be in conflict with their physical gender and keep all such information away from parents.
“This is as far as [lawmakers have] ever gone. This is the most extreme. Parents and teachers are absolutely outraged,” she said.
“Not one lawmaker campaigned on allowing boys in the girls locker room and restrooms,” she said. “Nor is there one who, I think, will, or will be able to stand and explain why they think this is a good idea.”
England discussed the issue with talk-radio host Mike Huckabee recently:

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/parents-warned-about-****-in-schools/#UOcGzK1W0PS20lzJ.99

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 11, 2013, 11:31:02 am
FYI, I've been studying about what mysticism is recently - when this word is used in Churchianity/pagan religion circles, they usually talk about their pagan ritual practices(ie-using yoga methods, walking labyrinths, etc in order to "get close to God").

However, the Webster's 1828 Dictionary has this to say...

MYS'TICISM, n. Obscurity of doctrine.

1. The doctrine of the Mystics, who profess a pure, sublime and perfect devotion, wholly disinterested, and maintain that they hold immediate intercourse with the divine Spirit.


Obscurity also means darkness - pt being that when you look at the agendas being pushed on our youth in these public schools, they are doing just that, deceiving them in darkness. For example, when I was growing up in the 80's, and then college in the 90's, a lot of these liberal indoctrinations like self-pride, feminism and environmentalism infiltrated curriculums. And when young kids are being taught it over and over and over again, they are going to buy into it.

2Cor_4:4  In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

Pt being that it seems like whatever is not of sound doctrine, is NOT of our Lord Jesus Christ.

1Tim 4:12  Let no man despise thy youth; but be thou an example of the believers, in word, in conversation, in charity, in spirit, in faith, in purity.
1Ti 4:13  Till I come, give attendance to reading, to exhortation, to doctrine.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on October 12, 2013, 06:22:20 am
If You Learned Your Kid Was in a School Play Containing Bestiality and Incest, How Would You React?

Let’s say your house is humming along in first weeks of a brand-new high school year, and one day you find out your kid’s in an acting class that’s putting on a play with some questionable content.
Like man-in-love-with-a-goat questionable. Like bestiality questionable.
Incest, too. And perhaps unsurprisingly, other sexually explicit content and a fair dose of swear words.
All acted out and starring teenagers.
That’s the news many parents received when it came to light that drama teacher Andrew Cupo of Cactus Shadows High School in Scottsdale, Ariz., introduced students in an advanced acting class to an absurdist play called “The Goat, or Who Is Sylvia?” by Edward Albee.

In the Tony Award-winning play — which students performed in class rather than in public — a middle-aged man with a wife and teenage son admits he’s in love with a goat named Sylvia with whom he’s had sex, the Arizona Republic reports, adding that the play also explores themes of tolerance, morality, and revenge.
So the Cave Creek Unified School District governing board entertained two hours of public comment about the matter, and the Republic reports that while three parents and one student spoke against the play Tuesday night, about three dozen students and parents spoke in favor of it, some adding that those opposed added fuel to the fire by not speaking to Cupo or the school principal first.
“My daughter was not negatively impacted by the play but she was negatively impacted by being asked in the office if she acted out this play and things she never would have thought of,” said one parent, Sharon Smith.

Jacob Emnett is in Cupo’s class and said he was called to the office and “confronted” by parents calling the play into question: “…We were asked what we thought of Mr. Cupo teaching bestiality. Ironic that they spoke to us of bestiality without the consent of our parents — the same act they condemn Mr. Cupo for. Where a few words or an e-mail would suffice, those who stand against him sought to tear him down.”
Elissa Ericson, head of the fine arts department at Cactus Shadows, tells the Republic that Cupo warned students several times about the explicit content in “The Goat” and offered several opportunities to opt out and study an alternate script. In addition, Ericson notes, parents sign a syllabus at the start of the semester which includes a statement that “students may be exposed to stories or characters that express views and beliefs that differ from their own or those of their parents.”
That wasn’t good enough for parent Guy McAtee, who told the governing board members he assumed they vetted curriculum content.
“Having signed an acknowledgement of the course curriculum is in no way authorization for material of this nature to be approved,” McAtee said, who then made a blistering point.
“I’m sure that since it’s appropriate material, that the language I’m about to use will be approved by the school board,” he said before launching into a passage that included several vulgar sexual expressions.
“That’s offensive to me,” he noted to the board, adding that such content is inappropriate for high school classes.
To that end nine parents filed a report with the Scottsdale Police Department in regard to the issue, reports KNXV-TV in Phoenix, and as district policy dictates, Cupo was placed on paid administrative leave.
Which doesn’t sit well with many of his students, who planned a peaceful protest Friday at Cactus Shadows during which they’ll don his signature bow tie as well as their own homemade T-shirts emblazoned with the Twitter hashtag #freecupo.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on October 12, 2013, 09:48:13 am
Left's new crusade: Adult-kid sex
Exclusive: Matt Barber exposes 'progressive' effort to roll-back laws against pedophilia

So much for the left’s “consenting adults” rhetoric on sex. Forever the consummate conservationists, our self-described “progressive” friends at the ACLU, MSNBC and elsewhere have been ramping-up efforts to downsize from “consenting adults” to merely “consenting” – a far less cumbersome qualifier in the noble struggle for unrestrained sexual license.
Tolerating “intergenerational romance” for “minor-attracted” adults is all the rage these days.
Ever hear of Kaitlyn Hunt? Over the past year or so this poor, misunderstood lesbian woman’s “anti-gay persecution” has become a cause célčbre among “gay rights” activists and other left-wing purveyors of perversion.
Despite mass rallies and online petitions signed by hundreds-of-thousands of the uber-”tolerant,” the clearly “homophobic” Florida criminal justice system has, nonetheless, convicted Ms. Hunt of multiple felonies for sexually assaulting – repeatedly – a 14-year-old girl.
Oh, sure, her minor victim allegedly “consented” to what the “Free Kate” crowd has portrayed as a harmless tryst – but, of course, by law children below the age of consent cannot consent to sex with adults. Period.
Still, the “progressive” establishment evidently felt that, for whatever reason, this was their hill to die on – this was the case that might help them realize the historical “gay rights” goal of rolling-back most, if not all, age of consent laws – statutes designed to protect children from adult sexual predators like, well, Kate.
Veteran journalist Robert Stacy McCain has covered the Hunt case extensively. In a recent piece for the American Spectator headlined “Kaitlyn Hunt is guilty and, yes, there is a movement to ‘normalize pedophilia,’” McCain writes: “Kaitlyn Hunt is a criminal. We can state that as a Neutral Objective Fact, now that the 19-year-old former cheerleader has pleaded ‘no contest’ to multiple felonies related to her sexual affair with a minor. What remains is the question of what her plea in a Florida courtroom Thursday means for what Rush Limbaugh has called the movement to ‘normalize pedophilia.”‘
Here’s the answer: There is no question. There is categorically a movement to normalize pedophilia. I’ve witnessed it firsthand and, despite “progressive” protestations to the contrary, the “**** rights” movement is inexorably linked to the so-called “gay rights” movement.
Two years ago I – along with the venerable child advocate Dr. Judith Reisman – attended a Maryland conference hosted by the **** group B4U-ACT. Around 50 individuals were in attendance, including a number of admitted pedophiles (or “minor-attracted persons,” as they euphemistically prefer).
Also present were a few self-described “gay activists” and several supportive mental-health professionals. World renowned “sexologist” Dr. Fred Berlin of Johns Hopkins University gave the keynote address, opening with: “I want to completely support the goal of B4U-ACT.”
Here are some highlights from the conference:
 •Pedophiles are “unfairly stigmatized and demonized” by society.
 •“We are not required to interfere with or inhibit our child’s sexuality.”
 •“Children are not inherently unable to consent” to sex with an adult.
 •An adult’s desire to have sex with children is “normative.”
 •“These things are not black and white; there are various shades of gray.”
 •A consensus belief by both speakers and pedophiles in attendance was that, because it vilifies MAPs, pedophilia should be removed as a mental disorder from the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or DSM, in the same manner homosexuality was removed in 1973.
 •Dr. Fred Berlin acknowledged that it was political activism, similar to the incremental strategy witnessed at the conference, rather than a scientific calculus that successfully led to the declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder: The reason “homosexuality was taken out of DSM is that people didn’t want the government in the bedroom,” he said.
 •The DSM ignores that pedophiles “have feelings of love and romance for children” in the same way adults love one another.
 •The DSM should “focus on the needs” of the ****, and should have “a minimal focus on social control,” rather than obsessing about the “need to protect children.”
 •Self-described “gay activist” and speaker Jacob Breslow said that children can properly be “the object of our attraction.” He further objectified children, suggesting that pedophiles needn’t gain consent from a child to have sex with “it” any more than we need consent from a shoe to wear it. He then used graphic, slang language to favorably describe the act of climaxing (ejaculating) “on or with” a child. No one in attendance objected to this explicit depiction of child sexual assault. There was even laughter.
You may think that such abject evil simply represents the fringe of today’s sexual “progressivism.” It doesn’t. It represents the honest.
Consider, for instance, that during Obama’s first term, the official website for the Department of Health and Human Services linked to “parenting tips” that referenced children as “sexual beings” and suggested that they should experiment with homosexuality and ****.
You may also recall that Mr. Obama appointed Kevin Jennings, founder of the “Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network,” or GLSEN, to the post of “safe schools czar.” The position is now defunct, ostensibly due to national outrage over Jennings’ appointment.
In keeping with the thinly veiled goals of B4U-ACT, GLSEN seems to be “running interference” for pedophiles, having tacitly advocated adult-child sex through its “recommended reading list” for kids.
This of no surprise when you consider that one of Jennings’ ideological heroes was Harry Hay, the “founding father” of homosexual activism. “One of the people that’s always inspired me is Harry Hay,” he has said glowingly.
Was Harry Hay fringe? No, not among “gay” activists. He’s an icon. Again, he was just honest. In 1983, while addressing the **** North American Man/Boy Love Association, or NAM/BLA, Hay said the following:

“It seems to me that in the gay community the people who should be running interference for NAM/BLA are the parents and friends of gays. Because if the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what 13-, 14-, and 15-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world. And they would be welcoming this, and welcoming the opportunity for young gay kids to have the kind of experience that they would need.”
If he were alive today, Harry Hay would likely have led the movement to “free Kate.”
And by “free Kate,” he would have meant – and they actually mean – “free us.”
And by “free us,” of course, what they really mean is “free children.”

Read more at http://mobile.wnd.com/2013/10/lefts-new-crusade-adult-kid-sex/#wyB77jpq6Kif3svf.99

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 12, 2013, 02:58:21 pm
If You Learned Your Kid Was in a School Play Containing Bestiality and Incest, How Would You React?

Let’s say your house is humming along in first weeks of a brand-new high school year, and one day you find out your kid’s in an acting class that’s putting on a play with some questionable content.
Like man-in-love-with-a-goat questionable. Like bestiality questionable.
Incest, too. And perhaps unsurprisingly, other sexually explicit content and a fair dose of swear words.
All acted out and starring teenagers.
That’s the news many parents received when it came to light that drama teacher Andrew Cupo of Cactus Shadows High School in Scottsdale, Ariz., introduced students in an advanced acting class to an absurdist play called “The Goat, or Who Is Sylvia?” by Edward Albee.

In the Tony Award-winning play — which students performed in class rather than in public — a middle-aged man with a wife and teenage son admits he’s in love with a goat named Sylvia with whom he’s had sex, the Arizona Republic reports, adding that the play also explores themes of tolerance, morality, and revenge.
So the Cave Creek Unified School District governing board entertained two hours of public comment about the matter, and the Republic reports that while three parents and one student spoke against the play Tuesday night, about three dozen students and parents spoke in favor of it, some adding that those opposed added fuel to the fire by not speaking to Cupo or the school principal first.

I saw recently how the MPAA(Motion Picture Association of America) has toned down their rules over which films get a PG-13 compared to an R rating. There are a lot of movies in recent years getting a PG-13 rating that would have gotten an R rating in the 80's and 90's.

Pt being that as modern-times have gone on, what was either not tolerated or just merely tolerated back then is now accepted. And we're seeing a lot of this infiltrated to our youth in institutions now.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on October 22, 2013, 07:33:01 am
Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement

By Steve Baldwin
September 29, 2013

Lately, the gay movement seems to be making large gains in its war on America's Judeo-Christian culture. Gay characters have become the norm on sitcoms; it has become fashionable to attack the Boy Scouts; homosexual propaganda inundates many of our public schools; nearly all the mainstream religious denominations have "revised" their understanding of Biblical teaching concerning homosexuality; and the gay "rights" legislative agenda is succeeding beyond the advocates' wildest imaginations.

And yet the destructive impact homosexuality has upon Western Civilization is rarely discussed by columnists, reporters, religious leaders, politicians or by anyone else for that matter. Even some conservative publications choose to ignore the issue and instead have published articles arguing for greater tolerance of the gay lifestyle.

Indeed, on the homosexual issue, conservatives seem divided between a "live and let live" attitude and one that concludes that the homosexual agenda will have to be curtailed if the Judeo-Christian culture is to survive. However, overwhelming evidence supports the belief that homosexuality is a sexual deviancy often accompanied by disorders that have dire consequences for our culture. A vast amount of data demonstrating the deviant nature of the gay lifestyle is ignored by the media as well as the leadership of the psychological, psychiatric, and medical professions.

It is difficult to convey the dark side of the homosexual culture without appearing harsh. However, it is time to acknowledge that homosexual behavior threatens the foundation of Western civilization ─ the nuclear family. An unmistakable manifestation of the attack on the family unit is the homosexual community's efforts to target children both for their own sexual pleasure and to enlarge the homosexual movement. The homosexual community and its allies in the media scoff at this argument. They insist it is merely a tactic to demonize the homosexual movement. After all, they argue, heterosexual molestation is a far more serious problem.

Unfortunately, the truth is stranger than fiction. Research confirms that homosexuals molest children at a rate vastly higher than heterosexuals, and the mainstream homosexual culture commonly promotes sex with children.[1] Homosexual leaders repeatedly argue for the freedom to engage in consensual sex with children, and blind surveys reveal a shockingly high number of homosexuals admit to sexual contact with minors.[2] Indeed, the homosexual community is driving the worldwide campaign to lower the legal age of consent.

This trend comes at the expense of our children's safety. The incident in Los Angeles involving group homes operated by the Gay and Lesbian Adolescent Social Services (GLASS) exemplifies this danger. GLASS receives taxpayer monies to take in troubled youth referred to them by the social service departments of various southern counties in California.[3]

GLASS's own website should have been warning enough. GLASS believes that some children are born gay (a view not backed by any science) and announced that they target "youth who are confused about their sexual identities."[4] The website links to a myriad of gay sites targeting the youth, including one promoting a book that promotes sex with children.[5] GLASS's founder and former executive director, Teresa DeCrescenzo, edited a book that helps youth discover their homosexuality.[6]

It came as no surprise that the California Department of Social Services found "on numerous occasions beginning at least as early as 1994, adults affiliated with GLASS, including staff members, members of the GLASS board of directors and volunteers, sexually abused or molested children who were placed with GLASS."[7] The Department of Social Services found that DeCrescenzo, aware of the allegations of molestation, determined staff conduct not to be inappropriate.[8] Apparently, DeCrescenzo believes molestation is part of the "coming out" process that she glorifies in her writings.

One would think that a molestation factory disguised as a group home would be a good reason for the State of California to shut down the whole GLASS group home operation. Remarkably, the state of California, allowing GLASS to continue operation, removed a few individuals and placed GLASS on probation.[9] Even though additional molestation incidents occurred at GLASS facilities in 1999, they remain in operation until this day.

A Los Angeles Times investigation found that, in some cases, "it appears authorities never fully investigated those reports."[10] Indeed, not one person has been charged with child molestation or endangerment by state Attorney General Bill Lockyer, an avid promoter of the gay agenda.[11] After all, that would be hateful. If such a group home were operated by heterosexuals, the facilities would be shut down, any existing licenses revoked, and numerous criminal charges filed.

 Homosexuals are targeting not just youth group homes, but all groups that work with youth. When a California family sued the Scouts in 1993 for exposing their son to a Scout leader who molested him, the Scouts were ordered to turn over 25,000 pages of documents to the plaintiff. This unprecedented glimpse into the world of Scout ****s revealed that thousands of boys had been molested by Scout leaders and other volunteers between 1971 and 1991 resulting in the expulsion of over 1,800 Scout volunteers for **** activity.[12] The documents show that some Scout leaders molested over forty boys before getting caught and that many, once caught, simply moved to a different Scout troop and continued abusing boys.

Gay activists have spun the Scout molestation epidemic as a heterosexual problem. Examination of many of the higher profile cases, however, reveals that Scout molesters are attracted exclusively to boys and many lead mainstream gay lifestyles. John Hemstreet is a typical example. Hemstreet is a convicted child molester, former Boy Scout leader, and currently the President of the Toledo, Ohio chapter of Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG). PFLAG is one of the groups leading the nationwide attack on the Boy Scouts of America.[13]

Incredibly, the pro-**** group, North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), which calls itself a homosexual group, wrote a letter to the national Scout office urging "the Boy Scouts of America to cease its discrimination against openly gay or lesbian persons in the appointment of its scout masters and scouters and in its membership. This will permit scouts to be exposed to a variety of life styles and will permit more of those individuals who genuinely wish to serve boys to do so."[14]

Using twisted logic, pro-gay academics argue in various social science journals that the molestation of boys is not a gay lifestyle issue and that such men are not really homosexuals. It is simply amazing that gay propagandists and sexology "experts" are successfully bamboozling the public and the media into believing that a man's exclusive focus on young males should not be defined as homosexuality. But if an exclusive attraction of a male to other males of any age is not homosexuality, what is?

On one hand, homosexuals publicly claim that the molestation of boys is not part of the homosexual lifestyle. On the other, they are quietly establishing the legal parameters exempting the molestation of boys from prosecution on anti-discrimination grounds. For example, in Nevada a forty-two year-old man was arrested for molesting a sixteen year-old boy but was not charged by the district attorney. The reason given was that to do so would "discriminate against a class of people."[15] The deputy district attorney added that to charge the man "would be singling out homosexuals." [16] For years, conservatives have argued that so called anti-discrimination laws would eventually lead to granting legal protections for various homosexual deviancies. It appears that time is coming sooner than expected.

Research on the homosexual lifestyle confirms it is almost exclusively a youth oriented culture.[17] Very few gays exhibit a preference for older men. Some admit to a focus on teenage boys, some on prepubescent boys, and many cross over between categories. All are subsets of the homosexual deviancy. Moreover, most ****s consider themselves to be gay. In a 1988 study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior, 86% of ****s described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.[18] Child prostitution expert Dr. Jennifer James reports that the number of boy prostitutes who identify themselves as homosexuals has risen from 10% to 60% in the last fifteen years.[19]

Most of the public is by now aware of NAMBLA, a group that openly promotes sex with minor boys and claims that boy-lovers respond to the needs of the boys they love. NAMBLA is currently the target of a class action lawsuit by parents of children molested and, in one case, murdered by individuals associated with NAMBLA.[20] Publicly, the mainstream gay organizations distance themselves from NAMBLA. Clearly, this is merely a public relations ploy as the gay leadership realizes its agenda would suffer greatly if the public knew the truth.

The reality is that NAMBLA not only describes itself as part of the gay rights coalition, but its literature states that one of its goals is "cooperating with the lesbian, gay, and other movements for sexual liberation."[21] NAMBLA even "provide[s ] financial and other assistance to GLB [Gay, lesbian, bi-sexual] youth organizations . . . ."[22] Indeed, some NAMBLA chapters meet at mainstream gay centers such as Philadelphia's Gay and Lesbian Community Center. NAMBLA's meetings and conferences always feature mainstream gay leaders and speakers. For example, Don Kilhefner, of the Los Angeles Gay Community Service Center, gave a speech to Los Angeles NAMBLA members on the subject of "The Significance of Man/Boy Love in the Gay Community."

The most comprehensive gay networking website, the Queer Resource Directory (www.qrd.org), links every gay group in the country including NAMBLA and other homosexual groups that focus on youth. NAMBLA marches in gay pride parades with the consent of the gay leadership. Many of the homosexual movement's most prominent leaders endorse NAMBLA and its goals. Gay authors and leaders such as Allen Ginsberg, Gayle Rubin, Larry Kramer (founder of ACT-UP), Pat Califia, Jane Rule, Michael Kearns, and Michel Foucault have all written in favor of either NAMBLA or man-boy relationships.[23] Harry Hay, whom many consider the founder of the American homosexual movement, invited NAMBLA members to march with him in the 1993 "March on Washington" gay rights parade. He also marched in the 1986 Los Angeles gay parade wearing a shirt emblazoned with the words "NAMBLA walks with me."[24]

Leading mainstream homosexual newspapers and magazines such as the Advocate, Edge, Metroline, The Guide, and The San Francisco Sentinel have not only published pro-NAMBLA articles and columns but also many have editorialized in favor of NAMBLA and sex with children. The editor of The Guide, Ed Hougen, stated in an interview with Lambda Report, "I believe they [NAMBLA] are generally interested in the right of young people to be sexual . . . . I am glad there is a group like NAMBLA that is willing to be courageous." The San Francisco Sentinel was more blunt: "NAMBLA's position on sex is not unreasonable, just unpopular. [W]hen a 14 year old gay boy approaches a man for sex, it's because he wants sex with a man."[25]

There is also the matter of NAMBLA's membership status in the International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA), recognized at one time by the United Nations as the official Non-Government Organization (NGO) representing the gay community worldwide. When NAMBLA's ILGA membership became public, a whirlwind of international controversy erupted. Some gay leaders viewed this attention as harmful to the gay movement's image and goals and urged the expulsion of NAMBLA for purely political purposes.

However, the media failed to report that ILGA itself had hosted workshops on pedophilia and passed resolutions in 1985, 1988, and 1990 to abolish age of consent laws claiming that "same sex age of consent laws often operate to oppress and not to protect" and supported "the right of every individual, regardless of age, to explore and develop her or his sexuality."[26]

Eventually, reacting to congressional legislation threatening the reduction of $119 million in financial support, the United Nations kicked out ILGA in 1995 for refusing to sever ties with a half dozen member groups that advocated or promoted pedophilia. Revealingly, even though ILGA did expel NAMBLA (many say it was for show), it could not muster enough support among its membership to expel other more powerful and discreet pro-**** organizations from Germany and other countries. It is extremely revealing that the majority of members of the world's leading homosexual coalition, the ILGA, decided they would rather be excluded from UN deliberations than vote out groups that advocate sex with children.[27]

Aside from support for NAMBLA by the mainstream gay community, there is a wealth of evidence that homosexuals are the prime force behind the escalating child molestation epidemic. Indeed, over the last fifteen years the homosexual community and its academic allies have published a large quantity of articles that claim sex with children is not harmful to children but, as stated in one homosexual journal, "constitute an aspect of gay and lesbian life."[28] Such articles have appeared in pro-homosexual academic journals such as The Journal of Homosexuality, The Journal of Sex Research, Archives of Sexual Behavior, and The International Journal of Medicine and Law. The editorial board of the leading **** academic journal, Paidika, is dominated by prominent homosexual scholars such as San Francisco State University professor John DeCecco, who happens to edit the Journal of Homosexuality.

Indeed, the Journal of Homosexuality is the premier academic journal of the mainstream homosexual world and yet it published a special double issue entitled, Male Intergenerational Intimacy, containing dozens of articles portraying sex between men and minor boys as loving relationships. One article states that parents should view the **** who loves their son "not as a rival or competitor, not as a theft of their property, but as a partner in the boy's upbringing, someone to be welcomed into their home."[29]

Similarly, mainstream gay publications make no effort to hide their pro-pedophilia views. For example, BLK, a leading black homosexual publication, defended pedophilia with an article entitled, "Must Men Who Love Boys Be Guilty of Sexual Misconduct?"[30] San Francisco's leading homosexual newspaper, The Sentinel, bluntly editorialized, "The love between man and boys is at the foundation of homosexuality."[31]

In 1995, the homosexual magazine Guide stated:

We can be proud that the gay movement has been home to the few voices who have had the courage to say out loud that children are naturally sexual, that they deserve the right to sexual expression with whoever they choose . . . [w]e must listen to our prophets. Instead of fearing being labeled ****s, we must proudly proclaim that sex is good, including children's sexuality . . . . We must do it for the children's sake .[32]

Without equivocating, the Guide is saying that gays must molest children for their own sake.

While the mainstream media has apparently refused to engage in any kind of investigative expose of the gay movement, it is not difficult to find support for child sex among key homosexual leaders in their publications and literature. For example, the founder of the infamous homosexual group, ACT-UP, Larry Kramer, wrote in his book, Report from the Holocaust: The Making of an AIDS Activist, "In those instances where children do have sex with their homosexual elders, be they teachers or anyone else, I submit that often, very often, the child desires the activity, and perhaps even solicits it."

In a letter to the editor of a gay newspaper, Andy Humm, a key leader of one of America's largest gay youth groups, Advocates for Youth, said, "No one should be denied basic civil rights because of his or her orientation, whether the person be homosexual, heterosexual, transsexual, transvestite, ****, sadist, masochist, asexual, whatever one can imagine . . . . They are in themselves natural variations."[33]

A 1995 content analysis by Dr. Judith Reisman of the Institute for Media Education, focusing on advertisements in the nation's most influential homosexual newspaper, The Advocate, reveals that 63% of the personal ads sought or offered prostitution.[34] Many of them openly solicit boys.[35] The Advocate also advertises a "Penetrable Boy Doll . . . available in 3 provocative positions."[36] Reisman found that the number of erotic boy images per issue of The Advocate averaged fourteen.[37] Some homosexual publications, such as the southern Californian newspaper Update, are brazen enough to advertise for donations for the legal costs of homosexuals arrested for child molestation.

Indeed, NAMBLA and other pro-**** literature can be found wherever homosexuals congregate (homosexual bookstores, bathhouses, festivals, gay bars, etc.). When Americans for Truth About Homosexuality leader Peter LaBarbera asked the manager of one of Boston's leading gay bookstores, Glad Day Bookshop, to quit selling **** literature he replied, "Our policy is to sell everything that's available to the [gay] community."[38]

The owner of a prominent Philadelphia gay book store, Giovanni's Room, pulled NAMBLA's literature off its shelves only due to boycott threats but commented, "I think it's a strange day for gay culture when we start banning something because it makes us uncomfortable . . . especially when that thing is a foundation of gay literature. If we pulled all the books that had adult-youth sexual themes, we wouldn't have many novels, memoirs, or biographies left."[39]

The most popular gay fiction books on the market today are rich with idyllic accounts of intergenerational relationships according to writer Philip Guichard in a Village Voice article. Doubleday published a book in 1998, The Gay Canon: Great Books Every Gay Man Should Read, which recommends numerous works that portray sex with boys in a positive manner. The Border bookstore chain sells a book, A History of Gay Literature: The Male Tradition, which includes a chapter devoted to the history of pro-**** literature as an indisputable part of homosexual literary history.

The Gay Men's Press publishes a bestsellers list on which appear such books as Dares to Speak: History and Contemporary Perspectives on Boy-Love, Some Boys, and For a Lost Soldier. All these books can only be described as pro-****. The authoritative Encyclopedia of Homosexuality claims to acknowledge, "the fact that until very recently man/boy love relationships were accepted as a part, and indeed were a major part, of male homosexuality."[40] The leading dictionary of the homosexual culture, The Queens' Vernacular, lists 254 of its 12,000 words as having to do with sex with boys.

One of the nation's largest publishers of homosexual literature and books, Alyson Publications, also publishes pro-**** books such as Gay Sex: A Manual for Men Who Love Men. This book contains detailed instructions for homosexuals on how to avoid discovery and arrest when having sex with boys: "Avoid situations where a number of men are having sex with the same boy, or group of boys, over a period of time."[41] Unknown to most people, Alyson Publications is also probably America's largest provider of pro-gay literature and reading material to public schools. Unfortunately, this market is growing at a tremendous pace. The infamous Heather has Two Mommies, currently being used in many public school systems to educate children about homosexuality, is an Alyson Publications book.

Even the alleged birthplace of the modern day homosexual movement, the Stonewall Bar in New York City, was notorious as a place where older homosexuals arranged to meet young boys for sex.

"Mainstream" homosexual conferences commonly feature speeches about intergenerational sex as it is now called. For example, at one of the nation's largest homosexual gatherings, the annual National Gay Lesbian Task Force convention, featured a workshop at its 2001 confab entitled, Your Eyes Say Yes But the Law Says No, which included a speech by an S&M activist about laws affecting intergenerational sex. The convention also featured another workshop entitled Drag 101: How to Turn Kids in Make-up into Kings and Queens.

Pick up any gay newspaper or gay travel publication and one finds ads for sex tours to Burma, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and other countries infamous for boy prostitution. Published exposés on such tours by former homosexuals reveal that thousands of American gay men are patronizing boy prostitutes around the world. The most popular travel guide for homosexuals, Spartacus Gay Guides, is replete with information about where to find boys for sex and, as a friendly warning, lists penalties in various countries for sodomy with boys if caught.

The government of Sri Lanka announced that more than 10,000 boy prostitutes work its beaches as a result of the high demand created by affluent Western homosexuals. But the dirty little secret of the American homosexual community is the thousands of boy prostitutes who service them within our borders. A book exposing the boy prostitution world, For Money or Love, Boy Prostitution in America, reveals that boys are selling themselves not only in the cities of New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Philadelphia, Chicago, Baltimore, and New Orleans, but also in smaller towns across the country. In street jargon, the boys are known as "chickens" and their customers are known as "chickenhawks."[42]

Homosexual Internet sites are no different. A quick search using the words "gay" and "boys" easily locates thousands of homosexual sites that promote sex with young boys and/or contain child ****ography. Indeed, it is the mainstream homosexual groups who filed suit to block Virginia Legislation, passed in 2001, restricting Internet use that proves harmful to children (such as chat rooms commonly used by ****s to find victims).[43] Similarly, a ****'s conviction in Iowa for showing ****ographic videos to five minor boys sparked widespread protests from homosexual activists when the conviction was upheld on appeal by the Iowa Supreme Court.[44]

The Holy Grail of the **** movement is the lowering or elimination of all age of consent laws. The main warriors in this political and legal battle are "mainstream" homosexual groups. Robert Knight and Frank York of the Family Research Council have thoroughly documented this in a report. "As far back as 1972, the National Coalition of Gay Organizations adopted a 'gay rights platform' that included a demand to 'repeal all laws governing the age of sexual consent.'"[45]

It is homosexual activists within the United Nations who are lobbying to give sexual rights to underage children. In England, the campaign is being led by Outrage. and Stonewall, both homosexual organizations. The Dutch homosexual group, Association for the Integration of Homosexuality, has succeeded in lowering the age of legal sex to twelve in Holland. Assisting them was another homosexual group, the COC, which stated:

The liberation of pedophilia must be viewed as a gay issue . . . [and that] ages of consent should therefore be abolished . . . by acknowledging the affinity between homosexuality and pedophilia, the COC has quite possible made it easier for homosexual adults to become more sensitive to the erotic desires of younger members of their sex, thereby broadening gay identity.[46]

In Canada, the effort is led by homosexual activist and NAMBLA defender Gerald Hannon. In America, aside from NAMBLA, the effort is supported by most of the major homosexual organizations such as the National Gay Task Force. Indeed, the annual homosexual "March on Washington" invariably releases a "statement of demands" which includes abolishing age of consent laws. Homosexuals in Hawaii have already successfully lowered the age of consent there to fourteen. To be frank, it is difficult to find an advocate of lowering the age of consent laws in the United States or elsewhere who is not a homosexual activist.

What then does the academic literature say about the relationship between homosexuality and child molestation? Quite a bit, actually. Scientific studies confirm a strong pedophilic predisposition among homosexuals.

Family Research Institute founder and psychologist Paul Cameron, reviewing more than nineteen different academic reports and peer reviewed studies in a 1985 Psychological Reports article, found that homosexuals account for between 25% and 40% of all child molestation. Sex researchers Freund, Heasman, Racansky, and Glancy, for example, in an 1984 Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy article, put the number at 36%. Erickson, Walbek, Sely, in a 1988 Archives of Sexual Behavior article, places it at 86% when the children being molested are male.[47]

However, it should be noted that homosexuals account for only 2% of the population which statistically means that a child molester is ten to twenty times more likely to be homosexual than heterosexual. In other words, heterosexual molestations proportionally are a fraction compared to homosexual molestations. More recent studies confirm this statistic. In 2000, the Archives of Sexual Behavior published an article by seven sex researchers concluding that "around 25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys. Thus the rate of homosexual attraction is 6-20 times higher among ****s."[48]

Sexual violence expert and professor of psychiatry Eugene Abel, in a 1987 study published by the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, concluded that homosexuals sexually molest young boys with an incidence that is five times greater than the molestation of girls.[49]

In a 1992 study published in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, sex researchers K. Freud and R. I. Watson found that homosexual males are three times more likely than straight men to engage in pedophilia and that the average **** victimizes between 20 and 150 boys before being arrested.[50]

Other data has come to the forefront confirming that sex with young boys is a way of life for many homosexuals. In 1993, the United States Army, Office of Judge Advocate, issued a study that analyzed 102 court martial convictions having to do with soldiers involved in homosexual acts over a four-year period. The study found that in 47% of the cases, homosexual men victimized a youth.[51]

A content analysis of molestation stories by the Family Research Institute involving five major newspapers found around 40% involved homosexuals, but this number is low due to the fact that many reporters will not report if a child molester is homosexual even if he knows that to be the case.

A study by sex researchers Alan Bell and Martin Weinberg found that 25% of white gay men have had sex with boys sixteen years and younger.[52] The Family Research Institute conducted a similar study and found that "11 times more gays than exclusively heterosexual men reported sex with a man while they were under the age of 13."[53] A study by homosexual activists and researchers Jay and Young revealed that 73% of homosexuals surveyed had sex with boys sixteen to nineteen years of age or younger.[54]

In a study on male **** published by the American Journal of Psychiatry, it was found that 6% of **** victims reported to a Philadelphia **** crisis center were boys under sixteen years old.[55] And women are not raping them.

This type of behavior, however, is considered normal in psychiatric circles due to the influence of homosexual psychiatrists within the American Psychiatry Association. It is the homosexual caucus within that body that pushed to rewrite the diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. The new definition defines sex with children as a psychological disorder only if it causes "clinically significant distress" for the molester. Under that definition, most molesters are perfectly normal people.

The American Psychological Association appears to have similar sympathies when it published a sloppy and error-filled article in its Psychological Bulletin in July 1998, arguing that there is no research documenting that sexual child abuse is harmful to children and that "a willing encounter with positive reactions would be labeled simply adult-child sex" instead of using terms such as child abuse and victim. There was no outcry from the homosexual community. Indeed, they either remained silent or publicly defended the article. One of the nation's most prominent homosexual journalists, Andrew Sullivan, attacked critics of the study in the New York Times. In the National Journal, gay journalist Jonathan Rauch strongly defended the study and argued that child molestation should be called "adult-adolescent sex."[56]

The epidemic in male child molestation occurring simultaneously with the rise of an aggressive homosexual subculture is not coincidental. Due to the AIDS virus, molestation is often a death sentence. Further, the Journal of the American Medical Association reported that 50% of male AIDS victims reported having sex with an adult male by the age of 16, and 20% had sex with an adult male by the age of 10.[57]

The Center of Disease Control (CDC) recently reported that as of the year 2000, there are now 31,293 AIDS cases in the 13-24-age category.[58] The HIV/AIDs Surveillance Reports maintained by the CDC demonstrate that for the last few years around half of the age group 13-24 HIV victims were infected with the disease as a result of sex with adult men.[59] However, one must bear in mind that due to the incubation period of the HIV/AIDS disease, many of these boys and young men were infected as long as ten years previous to the reporting of their cases. This translates into roughly 15,000 boys that have been infected by adult men since the CDC started to compile this information. This is an epidemic no one seems to want to talk about.

Indeed, the response instead has been an escalating effort by the homosexual community to compromise every major youth group possible and to inundate our public schools with pro-homosexual curricula, counseling, and social activities. The YMCA, Girl Scouts, and the Big Brothers, despite also being plagued by molestation incidents, have all capitulated to homosexual pressure campaigns. Indeed, Girl Scout leaders writing in the 1997 book, On My Honor: Lesbians Reflect on their Scouting Experience, reveal that the Girl Scouts are inundated with lesbians─a third of its professional staff is lesbian─and they have even initiated a lesbian mentoring program. The Boy Scouts now stand alone among America's major youth groups in resisting the homosexual agenda - and that explains why they are under such ferocious legal, legislative, and cultural attack.

Moreover, the liberal media omits any mention of a person's homosexuality in covering molestation stories. This is reinforced by pressure from homosexual groups. The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLADD) disseminated a "media guide" to reporters nationwide in which they urge:

A criminal's . . . sexual orientation is not always obvious (or relevant) based simply on the circumstances of a crime . . . . [A]s a rule avoid labeling an activity or emotion as "homosexual" unless you would call the same activity "heterosexual" or "straight" if engaged in by someone of another sexual orientation.

The homosexual community knows that the capture of all major youth groups is absolutely necessary to the expansion of its movement. They know what most social scientists and sex researchers know but refuse to talk about : homosexually-molested children are likely to become homosexual. After all, one of the most common characteristics of homosexual molesters is the fact that they were molested themselves during boyhood. An article published by the American Medical Association reported that, "Abused adolescents, particularly those victimized by males, were up to 7 times more likely to self-identity as gay or bisexual than peers who had not been abused."[60]

It is high time that America's elected officials, health authorities, education leaders, and law enforcement officials act to not only tell the harsh truth─the homosexual community has targeted America's youth─but act now to counter this horrible trend. Failure to do so will have disastrous consequences for both our culture and for the health of our children.

rest: http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=18076#.UmPuDlN0eCk

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on October 26, 2013, 07:00:33 am
Toddlers Shown Cartoon Pics of Adults Watching P0rn

Children as young as 4 are being shown cartoon pictures of adults watching pornography during sex education classes, a BBC News feature has revealed.

Sex education consultant Lynnette Smith runs sessions for primary schools, in which children give a thumbs up or down to different cartoon scenarios, such as grabbing a woman’s breasts or pulling at a boy’s underwear.

The students are also asked when is acceptable to “have a little rummage in your underwear”, and the answer given is “somewhere private like the bathroom.”

But one teaching union has warned that such sessions may not be suitable for all primary schools because “Innocence is precious.”

Smith runs the same presentation for children between the ages of 4 and 11.

A BBC reporter sat in on one of Smith's sessions for 7- to 9-year-olds at a primary school in North Lincolnshire.

Children were heard giving “cries of disgust” and laughing during the half-hour presentation, which also involved the students naming body parts from a picture of a naked girl.

Parents at the school were said to be horrified when first informed that the presentation would take place.

One mother said: “I thought, ‘No they’re only 7.’ ”

During the session, other scenarios given the “thumbs down” included looking under toilet doors when someone is inside and showing your bottom to a camera.

Russell Hobby, the general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers cautioned that: “You don’t want to start too young.”

He said conversations about online dangers in primary schools should be “general warnings that they may see things they don’t like online and advice on what to do about it when they do.”

But Lynette Smith has defended her program, saying: “My bottom line is to ask, ‘From what age are they vulnerable?’ ”

Sex and relationships education is not compulsory in primary schools, despite pressure from various campaign groups.

David Cameron said in September this year that children can be warned about the dangers of online pornography without an overhaul of sex education.


Title: Pedophilia Now Classified as Sexual Orientation
Post by: Mark on October 30, 2013, 12:27:53 pm
Pedophilia Now Classified as Sexual Orientation

The American Psychological Association (APA) has changed the classification of pedophilia from a disorder to a sexual orientation or preference in its latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V).

Neon Tommy is reporting that the APA is drawing “a very distinct line between pedophilia and pedophilic disorder.”

For instance, pedophilia is defined in the new edition as referring “to a sexual orientation or profession of sexual preference devoid of consummation, whereas pedophilic disorder is defined as a compulsion and is used in reference to individuals who act on their sexuality,” the report states.

This is not a total surprise as the classification of pedophilia in the DSM has been steadily evolving over the years. The previous edition categorized pedophilia as a disorder only if the fantasies or urges involve children under the age of 13, if they last at least six months, if the individual has acted upon them, or if they cause distress such as legal problems.

Paul Christiano, a registered sex offender and spokesperson for B4U-ACT, a pedophila advocacy group that offers support for “minor-attracted persons”, wants to see the system changed because of its one-size-fits-all approach that treats a man who committed 20 consecutive rapes and a 19-year-old boy who had sex with his 17-year-old girlfriend the same way.

There is some basis for wanting a change, writes Hannah Maluyao for Neon Tommy, but the grounds for this change are “murky” with B4U-ACT.

For example, when questioned about the most responsible way in which a **** should manage his sexual desires, Christiano said they encourage their members to keep their preferences as a purely mental exercise that is never acted upon.

“B4U-ACT does not condone illegal activity,” Christiano insisted.

“Yet how can we be assured that such behavior remains entirely in the mind and not carried out in the bedroom?” Maluyao asks. “Answer: we can’t.”

Christiano has also advocated for the “sexual autonomy” of children, saying in his senior thesis as a graduate student, that they “should not be left in the dark about their own sexuality.” More education in sexuality would help them to better understand boundaries.

“However, there is an underlying suggestion that with sexual knowledge comes sexual consent,” Mulayao writes. “If children were permitted to be more sexually autonomous, would they then be able to fully consent to a sexual relationship or more importantly, a sexual relationship with an adult?”

Caitlin Myers, a doctorate student in Sociology at the University of Southern California told Mulayao that while open discussion of sexuality would be good, children still cannot give consent.

“In theory,” Myers says, “pedophilia as a practiced sexual orientation walks a thin line. There is no possibility of pedophilia becoming an accepted sexual orientation in current culture.”

Dr. Gregory Popcak of the Pastoral Solutions Institute, and organization dedicated to helping Catholics find faith-filled solutions to marriage, family, and personal problems, does not believe people should be too concerned about these changes to the DSM. The changes made were more editorial than clinical.

“From what I can tell, the DSM V criteria for Pedophilic Disorder shouldn’t bother anyone,” he writes for Patheos.  “I’m, personally, not sure what to make of those who refer to the idea of a pedophilic orientation.  If it is just to distinguish between ideation and actions, I think that’s fine.  In fact, that would be exactly how the Catholic Church thinks of it.  One can have a predisposition to a sin or even a strong temptation to a sin without committing a sin. There is a big difference between thinking about robbing a bank and actually robbing it. Neither is good, but only the latter is actually sinful.”

However, he goes on to warn that “if calling it an orientation is somehow used  or co-opted by some social advocacy group to justify pedophilia as ‘just another normal expression of sexual desires’  then that would be seriously problematic.  That said, I don’t really think that’s what’s happening–at this time, anyway.”


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on October 31, 2013, 08:22:41 am
Sexual Predator Honored With U.S. Postage Stamp

by Matt Barber on October 29, 2013     

Benjamin Franklin famously quipped, “In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.”
Franklin evidently failed to envisage today’s postmodern left. For the conservative, there exists at least one other certainty, and it is this: The degree to which “progressives” attack you corresponds precisely to the degree with which you challenge any among their assorted, distorted and sordid sacred cows.
What would you call a 33-year-old man who both had and axiomatically acted upon a deviant sexual appetite for underage, drug-addicted, runaway boys? (No, not Jerry Sandusky.)
What would you call a man of whom, as regards sexual preference, his own friend and biographer confessed, “Harvey always had a penchant for young waifs with substance abuse problems”?
In a recent interview, I called this man “demonstrably, categorically an evil man based on his [statutory] **** of teenage boys.”
But you can call him Harvey Milk.
Harvey Milk’s only claim to fame is that he was the first openly homosexual candidate to be elected to public office (San Francisco city commissioner). His chief cause was to do away with the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic. In 1978 Milk was murdered over a non-related political dispute by fellow Democrat Dan White.
And a “progressive” martyr was born.
Merriam Webster defines “pederast” as “one who practices anal intercourse especially with a boy.” It defines “statutory ****” as “the crime of having sex with someone who is younger than an age that is specified by law.”
Harvey Milk was both a pederast and, by extension, a statutory rapist. After I publicly addressed this objective reality in the above-mentioned interview, the liberal blogosphere reacted in, shall we say, an informatively defensive manner.
A Huffington Post headline screamed: “Harvey Milk Was An ‘Evil Man’ Who Raped Teenage Boys, Unworthy of Postage Stamp: Matt Barber.”
The always-amusing Right Wing Watch blog breathlessly posted my comments with the header: “Barber: ‘Harvey Milk Was Demonstrably, Categorically an Evil Man.’”
And so on.
Here’s what’s especially telling about their reaction. Not one of the dozen-or-more publications that reported on my comments even challenged their veracity. Not one attempted to refute or deny that Harvey Milk was, in fact, a pederast and a sexual predator.
That’s because they can’t.
One of Milk’s victims was a 16-year-old runaway from Maryland named Jack Galen McKinley. As previously mentioned, Milk had a soft spot in his, um, heart for teenage runaways. Motivated by an apparent quid pro quo of prurience, Milk plucked McKinley from the street.
Randy Shilts was a San Francisco Chronicle reporter and close friend to Harvey Milk. Though Shilts died of AIDS in 1994, he remains, even today, one of the most beloved journalists in the “LGBT” community.
Shilts was also Harvey Milk’s biographer. In his glowing book “The Mayor of Castro Street,” he wrote of Milk’s “relationship” with the McKinley boy: ” … Sixteen-year-old McKinley was looking for some kind of father figure. … At 33, Milk was launching a new life, though he could hardly have imagined the unlikely direction toward which his new lover would pull him.”
In a sane world, of course, the only direction his “new lover” should have pulled him was toward San Quentin. But, alas, today’s America – a burgeoning relativist land of make-believe – is anything but sane.
Randy Thomasson, child advocate and founder of SaveCalifornia.com, is one of the nation’s foremost experts on Harvey Milk. Of the Shilts biography, Thomasson notes, “Explaining Milk’s many flings and affairs with teenagers and young men, Randy Shilts writes how Milk told one ‘lover’ why it was OK for him to also have multiple relationships simultaneously: ‘As homosexuals, we can’t depend on the heterosexual model. … We grow up with the heterosexual model, but we don’t have to follow it. We should be developing our own lifestyle. There’s no reason why you can’t love more than one person at a time.’”
Whereas McKinley, a disturbed runaway boy, desperately sought a “father figure” to provide empathy, compassion, wisdom and direction, he instead found Harvey Milk: a promiscuous sexual predator who found, in McKinley, an opportunity to satisfy a perverse lust for underage flesh.
Years later McKinley committed suicide.
Another teen who crossed paths with Harvey Milk was Christian convert and former homosexual Gerard Dols. In a 2008 radio interview with Concerned Women for America, Dols shared of how – as a physically disabled teen – the “very nice” Harvey Milk had encouraged him in 1977 to run away from his Minnesota home and come to San Francisco.
According to Dols, Milk told him, “Don’t tell your parents,” and later sent him a letter with instructions. Thankfully, the letter was intercepted by Dols’ parents who then filed a complaint with the Minnesota attorney general’s office.
The incident was evidently swept under the rug.
So what does a man like Harvey Milk get for his apparent crimes? While most sexual predators get time in prison and a dishonorable mention on the registry of sex offenders, Harvey Milk got his own California state holiday (“Harvey Milk Day”) and, more recently, his own commemorative postage stamp, awarded by the Obama administration’s USPS.
God bless America?
As troubling as the postage stamp may be, to me – the father of a soon-to-be-teenage boy – the specter of having a “Harvey Milk Day” forced upon millions of California children, parents and educators is even more troubling. Especially in light of Milk’s own sordid history with minors.
Even so, and quite obviously, not everyone agrees. Some have said that my reality-based assessment of Harvey Milk is “uncivil.” Our historical revisionist friends on the left tend to get a bit snooty when you publicly deconstruct one of their meticulously fabricated mythical martyrs.
I find that odd.
To me, even the mere notion of elevating, to hero status, a man who statutorily raped teenage boys, is what’s uncivil.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on November 04, 2013, 06:29:19 am
American Psychiatric Association Reclassifies Pedophilia, Backtracks

The American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) decision to once again reclassify pedophilia has led to further concerns that the professional organization is attempting to legitimize the disorder, paving the way for its defense and the recommendation of removal of age-of-consent laws.
In a press release Friday, Liberty Counsel, a nonprofit organization that promotes the causes of religious liberty, the sanctity of human life, and the family observed that in its newly published Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), APA “changed the classification of pedophilia from a ‘disorder’ to a ‘sexual orientation,’ but, following the public outcry, APA released a statement that it was a mistake.”

APA, Liberty Counsel noted, now states “sexual orientation” is an error and should read instead, “sexual interest.”

On Thursday, APA released a statement regarding what it referred to as a “text error” in DSM-5:

In the case of pedophilic disorder, the diagnostic criteria essentially remained the same as in DSM-IV-TR. Only the disorder name was changed from “pedophilia” to “pedophilic disorder” to maintain consistency with the chapter’s other disorder listings.

“Sexual orientation” is not a term used in the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder and its use in the DSM-5 text discussion is an error and should read “sexual interest.” In fact, APA considers pedophilic disorder a “paraphilia,” not a “sexual orientation.” This error will be corrected in the electronic version of DSM-5 and the next printing of the manual.

APA stands firmly behind efforts to criminally prosecute those who sexually abuse and exploit children and adolescents. We also support continued efforts to develop treatments for those with pedophilic disorder with the goal of preventing future acts of abuse.

Liberty Counsel cited APA’s statement upon the release of the original DSM-5 and the fact that the new publication “marked the end of more than a decade’s journey in revising the criteria for the diagnosis and classification of mental disorders.” APA said that the revision was done with collaboration from “professionals from the mental health and medical communities, patients and their families, and members of the public.”

“Clearly, if reclassifying pedophilia was merely an ‘error,’ it would have been caught in the ‘decade’s journey,’” said Mat Staver, Founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel. “Whether it is classified a ‘sexual orientation’ or a ‘sexual interest,’ any effort to legitimize pedophilia will provide pederasts with all the arguments they need to remove age of consent laws, and children will suffer.”

In its statement, Liberty Counsel noted the changes APA made to the diagnostic category of pedophilia over the years:
•In DSM-III, APA said that one who acted upon one’s sexual attraction to children was a ****.
 •In DSM-IV, APA changed its criteria, stating that pedophilia was only a disorder if it “caused clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational or other important areas of functioning.” 
•The Rind study was published, finding that man-boy “consensual” relationships were not necessarily harmful.
 •Subsequent to the public outcry related to the Rind study, APA said moral values trumped the scientific study.
 •In the original printing of DSM-5, “pedophilia” was changed to a “sexual orientation,” but another public outcry led APA to admit an “error” that will be corrected in “the next printing of the manual.”
“The DSM-5 has been under consideration for ten years. It is hard to accept that its publication was a mistake or an error. It is more likely that the public outcry prompted the APA’s recent press statement,” said Liberty Counsel.

Staver said, “The APA has lost credibility with this recent blunder over the classification for pedophilia. The APA has become co-opted by a political agenda.”

“The implications of reclassifying natural law, whether it be for same-sex marriage or adult-children relationships, are far-reaching,” he concluded.

Interestingly, APA has also been severely criticized by Allen Frances, M.D., the psychiatrist who supervised the publication of DSM-IV. Though Frances may have himself contributed to the classification “controversies,” his primary criticism of DSM-5 has been that it creates even more mental health disorder categories, and, consequently, an environment in which an increased number of human behaviors are open to the potential of being declared deviant.

“It is a sure sign of excess that 25% of us reportedly qualify for a mental disorder and that 20% are on psychiatric medication,” Frances wrote in June. “Unless checked, DSM-5 will open the floodgates and may turn current diagnostic inflation into future hyperinflation.”

Frances’ concern with some diagnostic categories such as those in the arena of sexual deviance is that, put simply, they are “pseudo-diagnoses” and not true “mental disorders.”

“There is no infallible definition guiding what should, and what should not, be included in the official manual of mental disorders,” Frances wrote in 2010 in Psychiatric Times. APA’s provision of increasing numbers of these “pseudo-diagnoses” in the area of sexual deviance, he stated, “has already contributed significantly to a grave misuse of psychiatry by the legal system in the handling of sexually violent predators – a misuse much opposed by the APA in a task force report and amicus brief to the Supreme Court.”

Frances argued that such diagnostic constructs “also medicalize undesirable sexual behavior and thereby provide a psychiatric excuse helpful to those who are attempting to evade personal responsibility.”


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 04, 2013, 11:45:44 am
Can't help thinking that maybe this whole Psychiatry industry mirrors practices in the RCC - it's really no different for someone to sit privately in a room 1-1 with these psychiatrists from someone going into one of those "confessional" booths to confess their sins to some priest. Only difference being the psychiatrist can see their patients. And it's not like secrets from either side will stay secret.

Guess it's no surprise that the Psychiatry industry has reclassified pedofilia, given that the RCC has quietly embraced it.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on November 04, 2013, 12:20:53 pm
Psychiatry is way more in line with theosophy and the new-age than with the RCC

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Kilika on November 04, 2013, 02:53:28 pm
Psychiatry is way more in line with theosophy and the new-age than with the RCC

Agreed. I think it's more of a case where the RCC has adopted some of the ideology of psychiatry.

Title: ObamaCare’s marriage penalty: Cohabitating couples will pay less for healthcare
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 11, 2013, 06:53:48 pm
ObamaCare’s marriage penalty: Cohabitating couples will pay less for healthcare than married couples

WASHINGTON, D.C., November 11, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Would you pay $10,000 a year to stay married to your spouse? Some American couples are being faced with exactly that decision as they consider their health insurance options under ObamaCare.

One of the most controversial provisions of ObamaCare is that it requires all Americans to purchase health insurance, whether they want it or not, or face hefty fines. To facilitate enrollment, the government has set up health care “exchanges” in all 50 states and Washington, D.C., where people can compare and purchase insurance plans. The government has promised subsidies to help those who cannot afford the higher premiums, but the way the subsidies are calculated mean they could pay up to $10,000 more per year.

The marriage penalty is a result of the way the government calculates poverty. While the poverty line for a single person’s income is $11,490 per year or less, a married couple is considered above the poverty line if their combined income exceeds $15,510. People are eligible for subsidies under ObamaCare if they make up to four times more than the federal poverty limit – $45,960 for a single person, or $62,040 for a married couple. But unmarried couples living together will have their incomes assessed separately – meaning that as long as each of them makes less than the individual cutoff, they can remain eligible for subsidies while bringing in a joint income of up to $91,920.

In 2010, the Heritage Foundation warned of this hidden marriage penalty in a report criticizing the ObamaCare bill for its “profound anti-marriage bias.” They also pointed out that focusing on the yearly penalty misses the bigger picture: the penalty is assessed over and over again throughout the couple’s life, meaning the real cost of marriage is much, much higher.

According to the group’s calculations, a married couple who remained married throughout their lives might pay more than $200,000 in penalties under ObamaCare.

“Most people feel that marriage is a healthful institution that society should encourage and strengthen,” wrote Robert Rector, the report’s author. “Inexplicably, [ObamaCare] takes the opposite approach. At nearly all age and income levels, the bill profoundly discriminates against married couples, providing far less support to a husband and wife than to a cohabiting couple with the same income.”

Rector said that ObamaCare’s passage means that “married couples across America will be taxed to provide discriminatory benefits to couples who cohabit, divorce, or never marry.”

Leanna Baumer, a senior legislative assistant for the Family Research Council, told LifeSiteNews.com that ObamaCare’s marriage penalty is a giant step in the wrong direction, one that could negate years of hard-won tax reforms aimed at encouraging marital stability.

“Not only do these penalties discourage couples from marrying, they ignore the bipartisan work that has occurred in the past decade to decrease marriage penalties in the tax code,” Baumer told LifeSiteNews.

“Providing further disincentives for marriage means that we make family instability more likely for some couples,” Baumer told LifeSiteNews.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich told CNN it’s possible the GOP overlooked the marriage penalty during the debate over ObamaCare, buried as it was in over 11,000 pages of regulations.  "It's both an anti-marriage and pro-divorce provision,” Gingrich said.  “I don't think anybody even knew it was in there."

**Well speak for yourself, Newt! After all, it was YOU(and the Heritage Foundation) who initially pushed this Individual Mandate idea in Obamacare over 20 years ago! ::)

The threat is more than theoretical. Nona Willis Aronowitz and Aaron Cassara of New York City are one such couple. Married for four years, they told NYC’s local CBS affiliate that while they are still very much in love, they are considering divorcing, at least on paper, because staying married will cost them thousands of extra dollars per year.

“After ObamaCare has rolled out, we realized that we would save thousands of dollars if we got divorced,” Aronowitz told CBS. She explained that the two of them combined make just over $62,000 a year, which is the cutoff for health care subsidies for a married household with no children. But if they divorce, even if they still live together, their incomes will be assessed separately, making them both eligible for federal aid

Baumer told LifeSiteNews that discouraging, or breaking up, happy marriages harms more than just couples.

“That result ultimately harms children, who have the best educational, financial, and social outcomes when they grow up in homes headed by their married mom and dad

Title: Re: ObamaCare’s marriage penalty: Cohabitating couples will pay less for healthcare
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 11, 2013, 06:57:21 pm
Psalms 2:1  Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?
Psa 2:2  The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying,
Psa 2:3  Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
Psa 2:4  He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.
Psa 2:5  Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure.

Title: Why Divorce Attorneys Will Love Obamacare
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 13, 2013, 02:51:31 pm
Why Divorce Attorneys Will Love Obamacare

Someone in the White House thinks marriage is a bad idea.

Earlier this year, TFT showed that a high-earning couple, each with incomes of $400,000, would save about $27,000 annually if they divorced and filed their taxes separately.  Now we learn that the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare, is dangling a similar fate in front of middle income earners.

A typical 40-year old couple with two kids could save $7,230 a year by divorcing if one partner earns, say, $70,000 and the other $23,000. Sixty year-olds earning $62,041 each a year would save $11,028 annually if they broke up.

This analysis below, written by Tom Blumer, a blogger at PJ Media, points out the unintended consequence of what Obamacare will do to marriages and families. He used this calculator from the Kaiser Family Foundation to run the numbers.

In January 2010, two months before Obamacare’s passage, Robert Rector at the Heritage Foundation gave the impact a name: the “wedding tax.” To illustrate, let’s start with the 60-year-old married couple with no children.


If they have identical earnings totaling $65,000, which will usually net down to $50,000 or less in adjusted gross income after all income and payroll taxes, their Obamacare exchange Silver Plan premium next year with the same earnings will be $16,382, or about one-third of what used to be their take-home pay.What can this couple do? Well, they could decide to earn a few thousand dollars less, which will negate the five-figure premium hit. Encouraging ordinarily willing workers to put in less effort isn’t good in any economy, but especially not this one. But if either spouse’s earnings are unpredictable or hard to precisely track, they could still “mess up” and get socked with a premium they can’t afford.The “easiest” solution would be to avoid the “wedding tax” entirely by getting divorced while still living together. Here’s what would happen if they make that choice:


Instead of facing an exorbitant premium increase once their combined earnings hits $62,041 if they were to stay married, each cohabiting adult can earn up to $45,960 before Obamacare’s “tax credit”-free premiums kick in. Their annual after-tax savings at age 60 if they shack up and keep their individual earnings between $31,021 and $45,960 will range from $7,650 to over $11,000. The annual savings will slightly increase every year until Medicare kicks in at age 65. That kind of money can buy a lot of gifts for the grandkids.But the grandkids will also face the prospect of seeing their moms and dads divorce because of Obamacare.

Let’s look at the situation of a 40-year-old couple with two children. The spouses’ annual earnings are $70,000 and $23,000, respectively:


The couple’s annual unsubsidized premium while married is $11,547 (“tax credits” disappear at $92,401 for married couples with two children). But if they divorce and shack up while giving custody of both children to the lower-earning spouse, their combined annual premiums, at $4,317, will be more than $7,200 lower. That’s over $600 a month. As was the case in the previous example, the savings from divorce will gradually increase every year. Those parents will be torn between doing what Western civilization has considered morally right for millennia and their children’s financial well-being.(There may be contrary examples, but Blumer was unable to find a single instance where staying married led to a lower net health care premium compared to divorcing and living together.) Clearly, many couples who are considering marriage, especially after several years of seeing formerly married couples regress to cohabiting, will look at Obamacare’s “wedding tax” and say, “Never mind.” The effect on society will be incalculable, and certainly not for the good. - See more at: http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2013/10/02/Why-Divorce-Attorneys-Will-Love-Obamacare#sthash.AjZ3WK2X.dpuf

Title: Re: Why Divorce Attorneys Will Love Obamacare
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 13, 2013, 02:53:55 pm
Luke 11:52  Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.

FYI, the NIV replaces the KJB fornication word with "sexual immorality". Pt being that how are all of these non-KJB pastors and Churchianity leaders going to respond to their pews over this issue in Obamacare when confronted with THIS passage?

1Corinthians 6:13  Meats for the belly, and the belly for meats: but God shall destroy both it and them. Now the body is not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body.
1Co 6:14  And God hath both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power.
1Co 6:15  Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid.
1Co 6:16  What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh.
1Co 6:17  But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit.
1Co 6:18  Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

1 Corinthians 6:13 You say, “Food for the stomach and the stomach for food, and God will destroy them both.” The body, however, is not meant for sexual immorality but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body.
1 Cor 6:14 By his power God raised the Lord from the dead, and he will raise us also.
1 Cor 6:15 Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ himself? Shall I then take the members of Christ and unite them with a prostitute? Never!
1 Cor 6:16 Do you not know that he who unites himself with a prostitute is one with her in body? For it is said, “The two will become one flesh.”
1 Cor 6:17 But whoever is united with the Lord is one with him in spirit.
1 Cor 6:18 Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a person commits are outside the body, but whoever sins sexually, sins against their own body.

Title: ObamaCare Penalty May Contribute To Decline Of Marriage
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 14, 2013, 05:25:25 pm
ObamaCare Penalty May Contribute To Decline Of Marriage

Marriage is on the decline, and some of that may be attributed to past and upcoming financial penalties from the federal government.

First marriages are occurring later in life — when they occur at all. In the past half-century cohabitation — living together prior to marriage or as a substitute for marriage — has increased 1,500%, according to a recent New York Times article.

Surveys show that about half of all women of childbearing age have lived with a romantic partner prior to marriage — a proportion that approaches nearly three-quarters of women in their 20s. The Pew Research Center found that nearly two-thirds of cohabitating partners view living together as a step toward marriage.

In the future, however, couples may skip the wedding bells altogether.

Social conservatives may lament this as a case of waning morality.Yet the reasons are partially economic: There are financial penalties in the tax code that kick in when couples get married.

There are additional penalties about to take effect under ObamaCare that further discourage couples from "tying the knot."

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) establishes health insurance exchanges where qualifying individuals can purchase subsidized, individual health insurance, starting in October 2013. However, the exchange subsidies are more generous to cohabitating partners than to married couples.

The ObamaCare marriage penalty creates perverse incentives that further discourage cohabitating couples from marriage — especially moderate-income couples.

The reason is health care subsidies to purchase coverage in the health insurance exchange are based on the federal poverty level, and the FPL does not rise proportionally with the number of individuals in the family.

For example, the poverty level is $11,490 for an individual, but increases to $15,510 for a married couple — only $4,020 more.

Because this poverty designation does not increase equally for each member of the family, two unmarried individuals living together qualify for larger federal subsidies than they would if they were married.

Consider two young college students living together, each earning 200% of the FPL (about $22,980 annually).

If that same couple were to marry, their combined household income of $45,960 would rise as a percent of the poverty level from 200% (individually) to 296% for a family of two.

As a result, their premiums in the health insurance exchange would be capped at a higher percentage of their income, providing a smaller total subsidy.

Instead of capping their premiums at no more than 6.3% of income as two individuals earning 200% of FPL, their premiums would be capped at 9.4% of income for a married family of two earning 296% of poverty. For example:

• Individually they would each qualify for a subsidy of about $1,087, or $2,174 per household.

• If that same couple were to marry, their combined subsidy would fall to $753.

• Thus, their marriage penalty is $1,421 annually.

Moreover, were this couple to have a child together, the Washington-based Tax Policy Center estimates this couple would suffer an additional penalty of $2,672 per year in higher taxes as a result of their decision to get married (although their ObamaCare exchange penalty would fall by $456).

It is a reasonable bet that $3,637 (the combined marriage penalty) is a large enough annual penalty to make many young couples living together hesitate about marriage.

The ObamaCare exchange marriage penalty is especially pronounced for moderate-income couples with combined incomes that fall between $30,000 and $55,000 annually.

National statistics already show that low- to moderate-income couples who cohabitate are about twice as likely to forgo marriage as couples with a bachelor's degree. A similar proportion of all these couples ultimately break up and dissolve their union.

However, cohabitating leads to marriage far more often among more highly educated couples. That may be because the tax penalties take a bigger bite out of lower-income couples' budgets, discouraging a trip down the aisle.

Research confirms that children benefit from the stability that marriage provides a family.

Yet, couples who cohabitate are more likely to raise children without the security of marriage. Government surveys find that about one in five women who begin cohabitating for the first time become pregnant within the first year. (For some demographics, this rises to 40%.)

The structure of the health care exchange subsidies will have perverse incentives on family formation. As a result of these and pre-existing marriage tax penalties, many moderate-income couples will decide marriage is a luxury they cannot afford.

• Herrick is a senior fellow with the National Center for Policy Analysis.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on November 20, 2013, 06:22:29 am
New Push To Force Sex-Ed On Christian Schools

An activist group in Scotland that promotes secularism is arguing that all schools – including church-sponsored classes – must subject children to a secularist’s view of sex education. “We believe that Relationships, Sexual Health and Parenthood Education should be mandatory across all state schools, with set curricular content modeled on the successful Dutch model,” said Caroline Lynch, head of the Scottish Secular Society, in a statement about the developing dispute over what will be included in sex education for Scottish schools. The Scottish government recently released a draft of its plans for sex education, which includes allowances for parents and students to opt out because of their faith. But the Scottish Secular Society blasted the allowance.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Kilika on November 20, 2013, 12:34:59 pm
Christian sex education class is really short, being summed up in just a verse or two...

"Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh." Genesis 2:24 (KJB)

"Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but wh0remongers and adulterers God will judge." Hebrews 13:4 (KJB)

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 20, 2013, 01:15:35 pm
Christian sex education class is really short, being summed up in just a verse or two...

"Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh." Genesis 2:24 (KJB)

"Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but wh0remongers and adulterers God will judge." Hebrews 13:4 (KJB)

And this...

1Cor_6:18  Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on December 28, 2013, 10:29:38 am
You Knew it was Coming: “Experts” Say Pedophilia is a Sexual Orientation – Hard-wired at Birth

First, let me say that I don’t want to hear anything from the homosexuals, their supporters, supporters of polygamy or any other perversion of God ordained sexuality. We told you this was coming and it has arrived. Researchers with Canada’s Centre for Addiction and Mental Health have concluded, after a decade of research, that pedophilia is a deep-rooted, unchangeable predisposition.
The Toranto Star reports: http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2013/12/22/is_pedophilia_a_sexual_orientation.html
Pedophilia has been widely viewed as a psychological disorder triggered by early childhood trauma.

 Now, many experts see it as a biologically rooted condition that does not change — like a sexual orientation — thanks largely to a decade of research by Dr. James Cantor at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health.

 Cantor’s team has found that pedophiles share a number of physical characteristics, including differences in brain wiring. It’s now thought that about 1 to 5 per cent of men are pedophiles, meaning they are primarily attracted to children.

 These findings have been widely accepted among scientists, but have had little impact on social attitudes or law. However, we are left with the alarming question: if some men are born pedophiles, what should society do with them?

Well, what do you suppose those who have kept their pedophilia under control to some extent, at least keeping it only in their thoughts? They are doing the same thing the homosexuals are doing: calling for societal acceptance, and a cry for special rights will soon be accompanying this demand.
Let me say that I realize all of us face different temptations. Some are weaker in areas that others are not. For those that fight against their temptations, whether homosexuality, pedophilia, fornication, pornography, adultery or a myriad of other sins, let me say “thank you.” Thank you for not justifying your lusts and thank you for seeking to keep them under control. The Bible commands us to repent of these lusts, as well as any action based on them, and Jesus Christ is a Savior of sinners from sin.
However, to accept that this is biological in nature is to miss the aspect of sin. After all, even these that are claiming this is from birth cannot prove it. As my friend Shea Bernard wrote, concerning homosexuality, “Dr. Francis S. Collins, head of the Human Genome Project, along with his team of over 150 of the top geneticists in the world, who sequenced and decoded the human genome, three years ahead of schedule, have emphatically said, ad nauseam, that there is NO gay gene.” To that I would add that there was no discovery of a “pedophilia” gene either. It may come as a surprise, but there are no “thieve” genes, “murderer” genes, or “liar” genes. This is a spiritual issue and deals with the mind.
However, Cantor wants us to believe it is biological. Cantor says of pedophilia:  ”It’s either purely biological or a mix of biological and experiential.”
Cantor and his former colleague, Michael Seto, are careful to differentiate between pedophiles and sex offenders. The first, obviously has to do with the mental part and the second is the criminal action part.
So, how are they seeking to help those in the first category? A website, of course. Enter Virtuous Pedophiles. It’s a website for pedophiles who have never molested children, but do have an attraction for them.
One individual that was pointed to in the article in the Star was a man by the name of Ethan Edwards, who at the age of 50 found he could no longer suppress his desires and simply look at young girls in a protective manner. Edwards is the co-founder of Virtuous Pedophiles.
“I realized that young girls certainly took my breath away, more than grown-ups are usually charmed by kids,” Edwards said.
Edwards claims that his site desires to prevent child abuse, by reducing the stigma against non-offending pedophiles. “We do not choose to be attracted to children, and we cannot make that attraction go away. But we can resist the temptation to abuse children sexually, and many of us present no danger to children whatsoever. Yet we are despised for having a sexual attraction that we did not choose, cannot change, and successfully resist.”
While I’m happy to hear that Edwards and others acknowledge their problem, see it as a problem and seek to keep it from being a problem for young children, it is those like Cantor and Seto that seek to justify the mental state and actions by claiming people are just “born this way” that concern me even more. This is the same argument being used by the militant homosexuals to advance their agenda in this country.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/12/knew-coming-experts-say-pedophilia-sexual-orientation-hard-wired-birth/#4sWH2bXPLrWUoOkU.99

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on December 28, 2013, 10:35:52 am
Apple Approves Gay Dating App For Children Ages 12

Apple has approved a gay social networking app that claims to be safe for children as young as 12, and aims to lead adults, teens and tweens to places that are "clean, social and fun." In the iTunes store, Distinc.tt is described as "an LGBT app that you can bring home to Mom!" But although it's supposedly safe for children as young as 12, it specifically states that it was created for "gay dating and chat" for LGBT or "curious adults" who are 18 and older. The app reportedly works by using "real-time collective knowledge to connect trendsetting crowds and travelers to the places and people that best reflect their distinct interests."


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on December 28, 2013, 11:34:26 am
Cantor’s team has found that ****s share a number of physical characteristics, including differences in brain wiring. It’s now thought that about 1 to 5 per cent of men are ****s, meaning they are primarily attracted to children.

Here we go again - the whole "chemical imbalance in the brain" propaganda they're pushing. What's next? Is Big Pharma going to come up with some "wonder drug" for this?

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Kilika on December 29, 2013, 01:08:05 am
However, Cantor wants us to believe it is biological. Cantor says of pedophilia:  ”It’s either purely biological or a mix of biological and experiential.”

It IS biological and you are born with it. It's a lust of the flesh, just like homosexuality. If you walk in the Spirit, you won't fulfill the lusts of the flesh. Most people are repulsed by some lusts, such as pedophilia or homosexuality, but it's no different that any other fleshly desire. Sin is sin if you are unsaved and under the law, doesn't matter what lusts of the flesh you prefer.

"But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof." Romans 13:14 (KJB)

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on January 03, 2014, 11:33:32 am
(Friday Church News Notes, January 3, 2014, www.wayoflife.org fbns@wayoflife.org, 866-295-4143)

- In a continuing onslaught of end-time apostasy and rebellion toward God's holy laws, as prophesied in Psalm 2, courts in Canada and Italy have come out in support of prostitution and pedophilia. In Canada, the Supreme Court struck down the nation's anti-prostitution laws. The unanimous decision found that the laws "violated the guarantee to life, liberty and security of the person" ("Canada's Anti-Prostitution Laws," Huffington Post, Dec. 20, 2013).

In a news conference, a Vancouver "sex worker" responded to the decision, saying, "I'm shocked and pleased that our sex laws will [no longer] cause us harm." Meanwhile, in Italy the nation's highest court overturned the conviction of a 60-year-old man for having sex with an 11-year-old girl. The man is a social services worker whose dalliance was with a girl "from a poor family who had known and trusted" him. In 2011, he was convicted to five years in prison, but he will now have a new trial after the Italian Supreme Court determined that the conviction did not take into account "the consensus, the existence of an amorous relationship, the absence of physical force, the girl's feelings of love" ("Court Overturns **** Conviction," 7 News, Australia, Dec. 31, 2013).

This type of ruling was predictable in light of the growing acceptance of homosexuality as natural and acceptable. If a sexual relationship between two men or two women can be legitimized because "the relationship is consensual" and outside parties cannot regulate "love," then who is to say that it is wrong for a man to "love" a child? Jesus is coming, but in His great mercy He is still giving the people of the nations an opportunity to repent and be saved. "The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance" (2 Peter 3:9).

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on January 08, 2014, 06:02:05 am
Here is a perfect example of the Kinsey Syndrome in a college teacher

Monogamy is unnatural

Posted on January 7, 2014by The Matt Walsh Blog

Monogamous marriages are unnatural. On this, I agree with the emailer below.
Now, behold these enlightening thoughts that I found in my inbox this morning:
Greetings Mr. Walsh,
I am a college professor, author, and researcher. It was obvious to me before you ever stated it that you are a man of little education and limited intelligence. Still, I commend your newfound fame and congratulate you on the enormous amounts of money you must be making.

[Five more sentences of insults and pretentious self-aggrandizement]
…You have become a hot topic in some of my classes and this very much worries me. It wasn’t until your name came up for a fifth time that I decided to investigate you. Your prose are rife with fallacies and Neanderthalic musings, so I could easily disembowel and discredit any part of it. But I’d like to concentrate on what seems to be your most common themes: heterocentricism and monogamism. Whether you’re writing about marriage, “stay at home moms,” abstinence, or any other “issue of the family,” you seem to think that there is only *one* way and only *one* sort of family.
The truth that either escapes you or frightens you too much to acknowledge is that the “monogamous heterosexual relationship” is a largely unattainable (and undesirable) myth. Sexual unions between humans are not meant to be permanent. As we evolve, so does our understanding of these truths. Monogamy is not simply unrealistic; it is unnatural. You do not find it often in the animal kingdom, and where you do it is generally born of an evolutionary necessity. The necessity of monogamy among humankind has evaporated. This is particularly true of men, who are simply not biologically fitted for the “one woman” life.
You could use your platform for good but instead you use it to make those in open and poly relationships feel subhuman. Beyond the latent racism and sexism in your writings, it is your constant reinforcement of archaic relationship models that really does the profoundest of damage. Before you jump to any conclusions allow me to tell you this: I am married. I’ve been married for 15 years and my wife and I both sleep with other people. We are honest about this, which makes our open relationship more healthy than “monogamous” relationships built on lies.
Judge my choices if you like, but when you inevitably cheat on your wife, and then continue to sermonize about the sacredness of monogamous unions, I will return the favor.
I don’t expect you to use this email as you seem to only respond to imbeciles and easy targets.

And here is what I wrote back to him:
Good Day Professor,
It will be a challenge to type this response to you, sir, while I tremble in the blinding light of your godlike intellect. Do you begin all of your lectures by reciting your resume and viciously cutting down your audience? If so, I can only hope that you don’t teach a communications class. But if you do, then I can tell you that I receive at least 20 emails a day from people who must be your students. They’ve taken your strategy to heart. You should be proud.
In any case, I will attempt to make a rebuttal, but I will first offer the disclaimer that I am not nearly smart enough to use phrases like “archaic relationship models” and “your prose are rife with Neanderthalic musings.” I also lack the power to magically create liberal buzzwords like “monogamism” out of thin air. No, my dear Professor, I am a humble man and I can only write in plain language, using words that, you know, exist.
Now, with my idiocy and your cerebral supremacy well established, let us commence with the discussion.
Monogamy is “unnatural,” says the Professor. And he says this as a married man — or “married” man, I suppose. A married person who doesn’t believe in monogamy seems an awful lot like a Satanist in a church choir, or an existential nihilist performing lifesaving heart surgery. There’s a bit of a philosophical conflict of interest at work, wouldn’t you agree? In fact, I wouldn’t even bother to address such absurdity if it wasn’t becoming so widespread. What you people — you socially “progressive” academics — have realized is that you can not launch a salient attack against the ideals behind marriage, or abstinence for that matter, so instead you’ve decided to make the bizarre case that these things are somehow mythological. The more you say it, the more people believe it, and the more they believe it the more true it becomes. It’s a clever trick. You’ve succeeded, at least partially, in shouting at a reality until it disappears.
But there is SOME truth in what you say.
Monogamy is not natural. You’re right about that.
It’s supernatural.
It’s above our nature. It might not be realistic. Space flight isn’t realistic, either. If I wanted to be natural, I could live in a hole like a rodent, eat insects, and scamper from one mate to the next, until, after a life of nothingness, I die alone in the cold darkness, decomposing into the dirt without anyone ever noticing. That would be natural. It’s probably pretty realistic, too. So it is fortunate that I am a human being and I am given the chance to transcend the existence of a rat or a lizard. I have the opportunity to experience supernatural things like love, and sacrifice, and commitment.
You say that men are especially ill-suited for monogamy. We are not “biologically fitted” for it. What does that mean, Professor? Do you go about your day and, before deciding on any particular course of action, ask yourself if it is something you are “biologically fitted” to do? I would say we are biologically fitted to be rational beings. And, as rational beings, we are capable of attaining higher things. Monogamy and loyalty are higher things. But are they more difficult for men? I can’t fathom why that should be the case.
I have found a woman who will be with me until I die, even while my hair falls out and my skin shrivels and wrinkles, even when I stumble, even when I fail, even through the doldrums of daily existence, through bills and dirty diapers, through all things — joyous or miserable, pleasing or painful — through every day until death comes. Why should it be hard for me to simply refrain from tossing such a gift into the garbage?
It’s hard for men to be monogamous? What a cowardly, pitiful statement. Also, how incredibly obtuse. It ought to be easy for us. Especially for us.
If you won 600 million dollars in the lottery, would you go out the next day and break into cars to steal the change from the cup holders? That’s what sleeping around is like when you’ve already found a woman who will pledge her life and her entire being to you for the remainder of her existence.
You tell me that you are in an “open marriage.” I will probably be lambasted for “judging” you for it, but, sorry Professor, an “open marriage” makes about as much sense as a plane without wings or a boat that doesn’t float. Marriages, by definition, are supposed to be closed. Actually, I’m getting rather tired of people like you trying to hijack the institution, strip it of its beauty and purpose, and convert it into some shallow little thing that suits your vices.
If you aren’t strong enough to stay committed to one person, that’s your business. Walk down that path of loneliness and confusion, but you can’t drag the entire institution of marriage along with you. Personally, I like circles but I hate squares. Can I subvert the laws of geometry and suddenly decide that all squares shall henceforth be circles? No, because geometry is geometry, despite my strange square-hating quirks. Similarly, marriage is marriage, no matter how many college professors insist otherwise.
All that said, I must agree with one of your assertions: I only respond to imbeciles.
Thanks for writing.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on January 08, 2014, 11:43:01 am
2Peter 1:2  Grace and peace be multiplied unto you through the knowledge of God, and of Jesus our Lord,
2Pe 1:3  According as his divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him that hath called us to glory and virtue:
2Pe 1:4  Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on January 13, 2014, 06:49:53 am
Sexting Now Common Among Very Young Middle Schoolers

More than one in five middle-school aged children with behavioral or emotional problems has recently engaged in sexting, according to a new study. What's more, researchers found those who reported sexting in the past six months were four to seven times more likely to also engage in other sexual behaviors, compared to adolescents who said they didn't sext. "We know early adolescents are using mobile phones and all forms of technology more and more and we know that early adolescence is a time when people become engaged in sexual activity," Christopher Houck said. "So how those two connect is an important area of study." Houck is the study's lead author and a staff psychologist at Rhode Island Hospital's Bradley Hasbro Children's Research Center in Providence. "Sexting" refers to sending **** or seminude images or sexually explicit messages over an electronic device, such as a mobile phone

rest: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/sexting-common-linked-sex-among-high-risk-youth-123824395.html

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on January 13, 2014, 12:52:26 pm
Pedophilia, Italy ... & us?

The conviction of a 60-year-old man for having sex with a pre-teen girl was overturned by Italy's highest court last fall according to a report by Agence France-Presse. Social worker Pietro Lamberti was sent to prison for five years for his relationship with an 11-year-old girl.

The original conviction in 2011 was upheld by an appellate court but now has been overturned by the Italian Supreme Court, which ruled the original court had failed to consider the consensual nature of the relationship, according to AFP. The court ordered a retrial.

The high court said consideration should have been given to the "existence of an amorous relationship, the absence of physical force, the girl's feelings of love," AFP reported. Russia Today reported that one Supreme Court justice said the sexagenarian and the pre-teen "shared a genuine emotional bond that could justify the carnal union between the two."

It seems the Italian Supreme Court has joined a growing number who are more than willing to acquiesce to the prevailing winds of perversity in regard to adult depravity and child sexuality.

Two respected publications have subtly promoted the idea in the past year that adults having sex with pre-teen children perhaps should not be viewed as taboo.

The British national newspaper The Guardian published an article titled "Pedophilia: bringing dark desires to the light" in January 2013. While it was a news-type report, a preponderance of the quotes were sympathetic to the idea of pedophilia.

Consider the following from The Guardian report:

"But there is growing conviction, notably in Canada, that pedophilia should probably be classified as a distinct sexual orientation, like heterosexuality or homosexuality. Two eminent researchers testified to that effect to a Canadian parliamentary commission last year, and the Harvard Mental Letter of July 2010 stated baldly that pedophilia 'is a sexual orientation' and therefore 'unlikely to change.'

"A Dutch study published in 1987 found that a sample of boys in pedophilic relationships felt positively about them. And a major if still controversial 1998-2000 meta-study suggests -- as Michael Bailey of Northwestern University, Chicago, says -- that such relationships, entered into voluntarily, are 'nearly uncorrelated with undesirable outcomes.'"

The Atlantic, in its August issue, ran two articles wholly sympathetic to pedophilia.

In the article "I, ****" Canandian journalist David Goldberg recounted his arrest in 2012 for possessing child pornography. A question-and-answer piece titled "What Can Be Done About Pedophilia" featured James Cantor, associate professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto who is regarded as an international expert on pedophilia.

Commenting in the aftermath of his arrest, Goldberg wrote, "The main query that I am convinced will always be without an answer is why I am a ****. It is the equivalent of trying to determine why someone is heterosexual or gay. We don't choose our sexual orientations. If we could, believe me no one would choose mine.

"The most important thing I've discovered in the 15 months since my arrest isn't the why," Goldberg wrote, "but rather what can be done to change the preconceptions and misconceptions that society has when it comes to pedophiles."

In the Q&A, Cantor makes clear he believes pedophilia is a matter of birth and not of choice. "No one chooses to be sexually attracted to children, although people do choose whether they act on their sexual attractions," Cantor said.

"The best current evidence suggests that pedophilia results from atypical wiring in the brain," Cantor said. He went on to repeatedly indicate that he believes pedophilia is innate.

It should be noted that neither Goldberg nor Cantor in any way suggested adults having sex with children should be advocated. However, it seems the Italian justices have taken their arguments to their logical conclusion.

If a person is born a **** and it is illegal to have sex with minor children, how does he or she find sexual expression? As long as pedophilia is against the law, the **** will be a frustrated outcast.

If pedophilia is indeed innate, then age of consent laws become the issue of debate. Does a pre-teen have the capacity to make a rational decision to have sex with an adult? The Italian Supreme Court has said yes. Hence, the age of consent laws in Italy will now have to be reconsidered.

What does this all mean for America? Already in the United States adults are allowing children to decide what sex they should be, judging from a handful of cases of children as young as 5 and 6 being allowed to pursue a transgendered existence.

If you believe a child as young as 5 has the capacity to rationally decide that he or she was born the wrong sex, then your logic would have to dictate they have the same ability to decide whether to have sex with an adult.

In the same way homosexual and transgendered activists have fought successfully to have laws changed so they can pursue their lifestyles, expect **** activists to follow suit.

The reality is children, especially pre-teens, do not have the cognitive ability to even know what is best for them. They certainly do not have the ability to rationally decide about having sex with an adult, much less that they are transgender.

Society should do everything in its power to protect children from those who would rob them of their innocence, particularly from perverts whose only desire is to satisfy their depraved desires, a concept it seems the Italian Supreme Court is unable to grasp.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 18, 2014, 12:23:55 am
Now Kinsey's deceptions have hit churches at full speed...

Christian Dating Culture (Part 1): Majority of Christian Singles Reject Idea of Waiting Until Marriage to Have Sex

Survey Reveals That 61% of Christian Singles Are Willing to Have Casual Sex


A majority of single Christians are rejecting biblical doctrine by choosing to have sex before they are married. Sixty-one percent of self-identified Christian singles who answered a recent ChristianMingle survey said they are willing to have casual sex without being in love, while only 11 percent said they are waiting to have sex until they are married.

In an interview with The Christian Post, two Christian Millennials share their diverse stories on faith, sex and marriage, and explain why many singles are battling against the "purity culture" of their youth.

When Heather Lindsey moved to New York City in 2004 at the age of 22, the Michigan native both attended church regularly and considered herself a Christian.

While Lindsey grew up in the church, she said it rarely emphasized reading the Bible or one's relationship with God. As an adolescent, her mother's only sex-ed advice was to use birth control when she became sexually active. But while in college, Lindsey "gave her heart to Christ." There, for the first time, she became convicted that premarital sex is wrong.

But despite this realization, after Lindsey moved to New York, she did not abide by this new sexual ethic. Instead, she entered and exited relationships frequently, often sleeping with the men she was dating.

"Even though I knew it was wrong, I continued to have sex outside of marriage," Lindsey told The Christian Post. "Why? Because when you're single you don't want to be lonely."

"I was the girl that broke up with one boyfriend and had another one on speed-dial—that afternoon I'd already be going out with somebody else. I kept a boyfriend because I liked the attention," she continued.

For Lindsey, her behavior was not simply a result of her conforming to the sexual values of her non-Christian peers. Instead, she had friends from church with similar sexual ethics and even dated and became sexually involved with a man who was serving at the same church that she was.

"We all went to the church. We were hypocrites. We said we loved the Lord but we ignored the scriptures that said that fornication is a sin," said Lindsey.

Lindsey eventually cut off all people that had been a part of that lifestyle. Several years ago she got married and moved to Atlanta, where, now 31, she is the founder and CEO of Pinky Promise, an organization that encourages single and married women to "rise above cultural pressures and to "stay determined to live for Christ regardless of their circumstances."

Only 11 percent of Christians are waiting until marriage before having sex

While Christians may see Lindsey's premarital sexual behavior as typical for that outside their faith, a new Christian Mingle study suggests that it is increasingly commonplace for Christians to sleep together outside of a marital context.

In a survey of 716 Christians released in January, only 11 percent said they save sex exclusively for marriage. Instead, 60 percent said they would be willing to have sex without any strings attached, while 23 percent said they would have to be "in love." Five percent said they would wait to get engaged.

This data supports a 2011 Relevant Magazine poll that revealed that 80 percent of "young, unmarried Christians have had sex" and that "two-thirds have been sexually active in the last year."

While the findings of a 2012 National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) and Grey Matter Research poll did not show outcomes as high as the two previous polls, according to its research, 44 percent of unmarried evangelicals between ages 18-29 said that they had sex, including 25 percent who said they had had sex in the last three months.

Battling against the "purity culture"

Emily Maynard, 28, a writer from Portland, Ore., has witnessed many of her friends rejecting abstinence, in what she interprets as them pushing back against the "purity culture," or the conservative sexual and dating norms with which they were raised.

"It's a family, church and social system that favors the idea of courtship. There were phrases like 'Don't date unless you're ready to get married' or at the age where you can support yourself on your own. Or 'Guard your heart, particularly as a woman.' I was told that even crushes were giving away a piece of myself," Maynard told CP.

Maynard said that as her and her peers grew up, many of them became "jaded" with their childhood values and consequently chose to make decisions contrary to those espoused by the purity culture.

"We were raised with the idea that says, 'Wait for God to bring you the one.' And 'Don't wait around, don't sleep around, and you'll kind-of get this reward,'" said Maynard.

"I think a lot of people who are dating in the Christian world, say late 20s, early 30s, they did 'the right thing.' They followed the system. They waited until they got married to have sex and their marriage fell apart by the time they were 25. I think there are a lot of people entering the dating world who are jaded with what a lot of churches and purity culture promises you," she added.

**Yes, the modern-day "church" system's BIG problem is that they turned a blind eye to no-fault divorce! This is why sodomy has been getting legalized at a faster rate now!

While the backlash might be true for some subsets of evangelicals, according to the NAE poll, most Christians attributed their sexual activity to culture, followed by lacking a strong biblical foundation and "living in the moment."

**This has been the rotten fruit of the whole "culture wars" since 1980, lead by the "religious right" - they pretty much threw out the bible.

The Church is following secular culture opposed to leading by example

Lisa Anderson, who is the director of Boundless, Focus on the Family's singles and young adults ministries, said that she was not surprised at Christians' high tolerance for premarital sex.

"Generally, if you look at the dating landscape in the church today, it looks very similar to that of the world. There's not a lot of distinction in the way people date [or] in the attitude toward dating and marriage," Anderson told CP.

**No surprise - as pretty much New Age theology, CCM, and Freemasons have infiltrated these Babel church buildings for a long time, and now their really rotten fruit is showing.

While "sex may be the determining factor" for some Christians "we're even seeing that line blurred," said Anderson.

"And in every other respect, we're generally seeing the same kind of attitudes and practices," said Anderson, listing "dating ad nauseum, dating indefinitely, dating someone without any specific game plan, and dating recreationally without a view toward marriage," as examples of ways that the Church has adopted the patterns of the larger secular culture.

"For the Christian culture it's extremely frustrating, because they are trying to go after something lasting, but they're using the same formula to get something that's just not going to get them there," said Anderson.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on February 25, 2014, 04:59:32 am
Sex And The Public Schools

You are going to have a hard time believing some of the stuff that you are about to read.  Children in America are being sexualized at younger and younger ages these days, and our public schools play a major role in that.  As you will see below, even kindergarten students are getting naked and trying to have sex with each other in our schools.  So where in the world are these kids learning to do this?  Well, it certainly does not help that there is more sex on television and in our movies than ever before.  And it certainly does not help that some of the biggest pop stars on the planet such as Miley Cyrus and Katy Perry are blatantly using sex to sell records to their young fans.  But we can’t place all of the blame on entertainment.  Without a doubt, our schools are playing a major role in sexualizing our children, and most parents have very little understanding about what is actually happening.

As I mentioned above, kindergarten students are actually getting naked and are trying to have “sex” with one another.  That sounds absolutely crazy, but it is true.  In fact, a case that made national headlines recently happened in New Jersey…

    Kelly Mascio, 43, is facing termination in connection with the incident late last year at Mullica Township Elementary School in southern New Jersey. Mascio, who has taught for more than 15 years, is suspended with pay while a disciplinary process continues.

    As detailed in a Mullica Township Police Department report, two of Macsio’s students–both five-years-old–went into an in-classroom bathroom and removed their clothes. When Mascio, pictured at right, subsequently discovered the children–a boy and a girl–they told her they were “having sex,” cops noted.

This is a sign of a very, very sick society.

So where did those poor little children get such a twisted idea?

It could have potentially come from a lot of places, but it certainly does not help that some public school systems are actually teaching kindergarten students about sex.  For example, in Chicago public schools kindergarten teachers are now required to set aside 30 minutes a month for sex education.

Does that trouble you?

It should.

When our kids get a little older, there seems to be very little that is off-limits in their sex education classes.  One father in Kansas recently discovered this the hard way…

    Mark Ellis says his daughter goes to Hocker Grove Middle School in the Shawnee Mission School District. She was so shocked by what she recently saw on a poster at school, that she took a picture of it home and showed her parents.

    Her dad initially assumed it was a student prank, until he called the school and found  it was part of the curriculum.

    “Why would you put it in front of 13-year-old students?” he asked.

    He thought the poster, which lists things like “oral sex” and “grinding,” might’ve been a prank until he contacted the school principal. He was told it was a teaching material.

You can see a photo of the complete poster right here.  If you live in Kansas, your tax money is going to teach middle school students about “touching each other’s genitals”.

No wonder our country is so messed up.  Just consider the following stats…

-According to a study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately two-thirds of all Americans in the 15 to 24-year-old age bracket have engaged in oral sex.

-Today, the United States has the highest teen pregnancy rate on the entire planet.

-According to the latest figures released by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, there are 20 million new sexually-transmitted infections in the United States every single year, and Americans in the 15 to 24-year-old age range account for approximately 50 percent of those new sexually-transmitted infections.

-At this point, one out of every four teen girls in the U.S. has at least one sexually transmitted disease.

These things did not happen by accident.  They are the consequences of raising our children in such a sexually-charged environment.

If parents only knew what was really going on out there, many more of them would be pulling their children out of the public schools.  For instance, in a previous article I shared a quote from one of my readers that actually attended one of the “best” public schools in the city of Detroit…

    The school was a new seven story building just a couple of years old. The bathrooms would often lack toilet paper & soap beyond the second floor (the main floor), the bathroom sinks would often not work. The water fountains on north side of the building on from the third floor & up did not work. The elevators would constantly break down. I even got stuck on the elevator before. I almost tripped down a half a flight of stairs because the elastic seal (it was the metal bar at the front of a treader of I don’t know the name of it.) the stairs was not properly installed.

    Students would often have sex on the stairs & throughout the school. Parents actually called the school many times & reported kids having sex on the stairs because all of them had glass windows 270 degrees.

And according to an ABC News investigation, this kind of thing is going on all over the country…

    Students told us that some kids are having sex in school bathrooms and hallways — even in classrooms.

    At a middle school outside Baltimore, Md., a couple of 12-year-olds had oral sex in their science class. Their classmates watched, but the teacher didn’t see them. (The teacher was suspended and later resigned.)

    And the kids say it happens at home too, and we parents almost never know.

Do you know what is going on at the schools where you live?

Unless someone comes forward, you may never know the twisted things that are happening.

And what is happening in our middle schools and our high schools is just the beginning.  In fact, some young students recently received a shocking preview of what they should expect once they get to college…

    Hundreds of elementary and middle school students who recently toured UC Berkeley got an early lesson in sex education when they witnessed a guy in a giant **** costume walking around handing out condoms, as well as a variety of condom-inspired games, an undergrad at the university told The College Fix on Wednesday.

    The schoolchildren were on campus last week at the same time that the public university hosted National Condom Week observances that, in addition to the giant ****, included an assortment of sex-themed activities such as a ****-anus condom toss, a vulva and anus “pin the tail,” and a condom water-balloon game.

We live in a society where anything goes.

If you can believe it, Facebook now has a whopping 58 different “gender classifications” to choose from.

Instead of teaching our children to make the right choices, we just encourage them to “try to be safe”.

What we need is more parents that are willing to step up and take charge like this mother…

    When a Milwaukee mother found out her 12-year-old daughter was talking to a young man and planning a fight on Facebook, she took swift action to ensure the girl learned a lesson.

    Lorraine Walls not only banned her daughter, Luticia, from social media, she also posted a video of her getting chewed out by her mother for breaking the rules on the 12-year-old’s Facebook page — just to make sure all her friends could see it.

If you trust the moral education of your children to the schools, you never know what you are going to get.  In fact, some of the worst sexual predators out there are actually working as teachers.  The following is an example from California that is one of the worst that I have heard about…

    Mark Berndt, 61, was arrested at his home in the Los Angeles suburb of Torrance on Monday, accused of abusing nearly two dozen boys and girls, ages six to 10, between 2008 and 2011, officials with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department said.

    Authorities began investigating Berndt over a year ago, after more than 40 photos depicting children in classrooms with their eyes blindfolded and mouths covered with tape were turned over to police, Sheriff’s Department officials said.

Sometimes predators like that get sent away to prison for good.

But other times they win in court and they get their jobs back.  Just check out this sick example…

    Here’s what Wisconsin’s legal system and its teachers unions have just taught the nation: If you’re a teacher and you get fired for looking at **** at work, you’ll get your job back.

    Such is the case of Andrew Harris, former seventh-grade science teacher at Glacier Creek Middle School in the Middleton-Cross Plains Area School District.

    The district’s school board Monday voted in a special closed session to comply with an arbitrator’s 60-page order that demands Harris be reinstated. He was fired in 2010 after receiving and viewing multiple pornographic and sexually inappropriate images and videos, according to a complaint.

Someone that is “teaching” your children right now may be a sexual predator or a **** addict.  According to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, there are 747,408 registered sex offenders in the United States.  And that number represents just the ones that have been caught and convicted.

We live in a sick, twisted, decaying society that is falling even farther downhill with each passing day.

So watch your children very carefully.  It is all too easy for them to become victims.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 25, 2014, 10:39:23 am
And what is happening in our middle schools and our high schools is just the beginning.  In fact, some young students recently received a shocking preview of what they should expect once they get to college…

And don't be surprised if it starts creeping into these Babel church buildings in the near future, seriously - look at all of the immoral junk they've been bringing into their walls in recent years(ie-CCM and New Age/Emergent theology).

Yeah, what is going on in these schools is something I would NEVER have imagined in my lifetime.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on March 24, 2014, 04:13:06 am
Court Rules Teachers CAN Have Sex In School Rooms As Long As Kids Don’t Catch Them

As long as the kids are away, teachers can play, a panel of judges said Thursday, ruling that educators shouldn’t be fired for having sex with one another — even in their classrooms. The Manhattan appellate judges said foreign-language teachers Alini Brito, 34, and Cindy Mauro, 38, were treated too harshly when they were dismissed for engaging in a **** classroom tryst inside Brooklyn’s James Madison HS in 2009. “The penalty of termination is shockingly disproportionate,” said the ruling, which noted that “engagement in what appeared to be consensual sexual conduct with an adult colleague is not in and of itself criminal or otherwise improper.”


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on March 24, 2014, 09:12:54 am
Never would I have imagined the rotten seeds of Alfred Kinsey's "research" would reap THIS bad.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on April 25, 2014, 10:49:21 am
Personally, I get tired of people telling me - "It was GOD who put them in these positions, so He brought them down for their sin". In the first place - these agendas were NOT ordained of God!(but on the contrary the god of this world, satan)

Youth For Christ Life Director Pleads Guilty To Sexual Exploitation Of A Minor

Updated April 24, 2014 12:22 PM | Filed under: Crime

(FORT WAYNE) - Nathan Hasty set up phony Facebook pages to solicit **** photos from children, including kids in his own youth group, according to a federal investigation.

A judge accepted Hasty's guilty plea on one charge of sexual exploitation of a minor on Wednesday and sentenced him to 15 years.

He had been a campus life director for Youth for Christ for about nine years, according to court documents.

In an affidavit detailing the investigation which dates back to 2012, an FBI agent who investigated the case said Hasty used Facebook under three different fake identities in order to start sexual conversations with several minors and eventually solicit naked photos of them.

Facebook contacted law enforcement about the fake accounts in January to February 2012.

The affidavit states that he had two accounts under which he pretended to be a sixteen-year-old girl. He used these accounts to message dozens of boys, most between the ages of 12 and 14, in order to flirt with these boys and start sexual conversations. He then asked for pictures of the boys, including naked pictures. Documents state he also asked the boys for webcams sessions, claiming he didn't have a camera and could only watch.

Hasty posed as a nineteen year old boy in his third Facebook account and contacted girls and boys. According to documents, he used this account to engage in similar behavior and ask similar questions.

The FBI affidavit states that a Facebook report linked these accounts by IP addresses and browser cookies, which means Hasty used the same computer (or other devices) to access these accounts and his other personal accounts.

Hasty was confronted by law enforcement at his home on Sept. 21, 2012. He admitted to the FBI agent and the Task Force Officer that he had posed as a girl using a fake Facebook account to speak with boys in his youth group. He said he might have said some things "he shouldn't have said" and that the conversation may have become "sexual."

Hasty was suspended from Youth for Christ as soon as the organization learned of the FBI's investigation. His employment was terminated on Sept. 24, 2012.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on April 30, 2014, 06:14:00 am
The Left's Push for Adult-Child Sex

Shocking allegations by former child actor Michael Egan against openly gay X-Men director and producer Bryan Singer have stunned Hollywood into relative silence. I say “relative silence” because unless he’s a Catholic priest, the relativist left’s false narrative is that a gay man is always the victim and never the victimizer.

Nonetheless, this latest episode has once again shined the spotlight on the long-established link between the homosexual lifestyle/movement and pedophilia—a link that, despite “progressive” denials to the contrary, is hiding in plain sight.

Egan has filed suit against Singer and several other high-profile Hollywood figures for homosexually assaulting him and other boys repeatedly at several “‘infamous' coke and twink pool parties” back when Egan was 15 and Singer was 32. (In the LGBT vernacular, twinks, also called chicken, are highly-sought-after underage boys used for sex by adult gay men.)

Egan’s claims eerily mirror those of former child actor Corey Feldman, who similarly alleged last year that such homosexual abuse is rampant, even systemic, in Hollywood.

But are these allegations really that shocking? Regrettably, the overwhelming weight of the evidence indicates that the abuse runs rampant well beyond just Hollywood.

To be sure, not all homosexuals are pedophiles. Yet a grossly disproportionate number of them are. I don’t write this to be insensitive, hateful, intolerant or homophobic.

It’s just the facts, ma’am.

Consider, for instance, a study published in the left-leaning Archives of Sexual Behavior of over 200 convicted pedophiles and pederasts. It found that “86 percent of offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.” This demonstrates, as notes Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council, that “homosexual or bisexual men are approximately 10 times more likely to molest children than heterosexual men.”

This makes perfect sense when coupled with another 2001 study in the same peer-reviewed publication. It found that nearly half of all gay-identified men who participated in research were molested by a homosexual **** as boys: “46 percent of homosexual men and 22 percent of homosexual women reported having been molested by a person of the same gender. This contrasts to only 7 percent of heterosexual men and 1 percent of heterosexual women reporting having been molested by a person of the same gender.”

The connection between homosexual abuse and gay identity is undeniable. Although clearly not all gay-identified men and women abuse children or were abused as children, the verifiable reality is that an alarmingly high percentage of them do and were. As with most forms of abuse, the cycle is both circular and vicious. Born that way? Not so much. Made that way? Sadly, it appears so.

But of equal concern is the fact that many of the most prominent LGBT activists across the globe have either overtly endorsed or given their implicit approval of what the left euphemistically calls “intergenerational intimacy” (read: child ****).

Take marriage equality activist Peter Tatchell, for instance. The GLAAD-affiliated blog Good As You glowingly describes Tatchell as a “noted British rights activist.” He’s “one of the most widely respected leaders of the international LGBT movement,” one of the blog’s commenters gushes.

Here’s what “widely respected” and “noted rights activist” Tatchell thinks of child ****. He wrote the following in The Guardian, one of the U.K.’s premier newspapers:

“The positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not confined to non-Western cultures. Several of my friends—gay and straight, male and female—had sex with adults from the ages of 9 to 13. None feel they were abused. … It is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted, abusive and harmful.”

Or remember Kevin Jennings, President Obama’s “safe school czar” and founder of the sexual extremist group GLSEN?

The Washington Times wrote of Jennings in 2009:

“A teacher was told by a 15-year-old high school sophomore that he was having homosexual sex with an ‘older man.’ At the very least, statutory **** occurred. Fox News reported that the teacher violated a state law requiring that he report the abuse. That former teacher, Kevin Jennings, is President Obama’s ‘safe school czar.’ …

“In this one case in which Mr. Jennings had a real chance to protect a young boy from a sexual predator, he not only failed to do what the law required but actually encouraged the relationship.”

Jennings later lied about the encounter until audio surfaced of him bragging on it. “I looked at [the boy],” he quipped, “and said, ‘You know, I hope you knew to use a condom.’”

Still, this pattern of homosexual abuse and facilitation of such abuse by the LGBT movement is nothing new.

Take Jennings’ hero Harry Hay. Hay is considered the founding father of the modern gay rights movement. Among other things, he has been honored as an icon for LGBT History Month by the entire homosexual activist community.

Not surprisingly, Hay was a child **** enthusiast and avid supporter of the **** North American Man/Boy Love Association, or NAM/BLA. In 1983, while keynoting a NAM/BLA event, Hay said the following:

“It seems to me that in the gay community the people who should be running interference for NAM/BLA are the parents and friends of gays. Because if the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what 13-, 14-, and 15-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world.”

Or take LGBT martyr Harvey Milk, a sexual predator known to have statutorily raped, repeatedly, a drug-addicted teenage runaway boy. Milk’s punishment? The Obama administration just awarded him an honorary USPS postage stamp.

Am I the only one who sees the pattern here? Has the goddess of tolerance really driven the world completely blind with madness?

If consistency holds and these allegations against Bryan Singer prove true (the evidence suggests they well may), I’ll wager he ends up with his own star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame and the next keynote at the annual HRC gala.

I’ll also wager that, either way, we’ll soon begin seeing more intergenerational sex aficionados “coming out of the closet.”

Welcome to the bottom of the slippery slope.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on April 30, 2014, 11:02:20 am
This makes perfect sense when coupled with another 2001 study in the same peer-reviewed publication. It found that nearly half of all gay-identified men who participated in research were molested by a homosexual **** as boys: “46 percent of homosexual men and 22 percent of homosexual women reported having been molested by a person of the same gender. This contrasts to only 7 percent of heterosexual men and 1 percent of heterosexual women reporting having been molested by a person of the same gender.”

Ted Haggard was also molested as a young boy(if you remember - he was the former head of the heretical National Association of Evangelicals, who was also a staunch anti-sodomy marriage activist, until his own sodomy activities got caught in 2006). Make no mistake - this was all by design - "expose" him just MERE WEEKS before the 2006 midterm elections, shipwreck Churchianity's faith even more, anger the lost world even more at Christians...and this was yet one more step to get Obama into office.

Also - it seems like a number of child actors from the 1980's are sodomites(read reports recently over how they got into sodomy marriages) - I think we see why...they were sodomized and molested when they were young in Hollywood.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on May 05, 2014, 12:11:39 pm
New Hampshire father opposes required reading of ‘pornographic’ novel in 9th grade English

William Baer has encountered some eyebrow-raising policies and practices during his children’s years in public schools, but he still wasn’t prepared for what he discovered last Wednesday night.

Jodi Picoult bookThat was the night Baer learned that his 14-year-old daughter had been assigned to read a novel that contains a passage so sexually explicit that he described it as “pornographic.”

The novel, “Nineteen Minutes,” by Jodi Picoult is a controversial book that tells the story of a fictional school shooting and the people it affects. Though the book has been part of the curriculum in New Hampshire’s Gilford High School since 2007, when it was assigned last Monday, school officials gave no notice to parents of freshmen English students that the book was being read, or of the novel’s sexually explicit content.

Baer tells EAGnews he became aware of the book’s objectionable material purely by chance. A family friend was visiting last Wednesday and talking to Baer’s 14-year-old daughter about how things were going in school. When she mentioned that she’d just been assigned the novel, the friend picked up the book and casually opened it to page 313 which contains a very graphic description of a sexual encounter between two adolescents. The friend was aghast as he read the passage, and asked Baer if he was aware of the book’s content.

“I was shocked when I read the passage, and not much shocks me anymore,” Baer says. “My wife was stunned by the increasingly graphic nature of the sexual content of the scene and the imagery it evoked.”

Here’s an excerpt from the explicit passage:

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on May 16, 2014, 07:42:49 am
Conference unveils strategies to use students to promote gay agenda in public schools

 A pro-marriage group is reporting that Gay, Straight & Lesbian Education Network (GSLEN) Massachusetts has revealed a behind-the-scenes look at the homosexual agenda's strategy about how to further promote its agenda in the state's public schools.

An April 5 GSLEN conference highlighted that one of the keys to affecting young people is having students participate in pro-gay activism, such as taking part in a local "Day of Silence" or campus LGBT groups. Conversely, these same encouraging students are encouraged to target and intimidate those who disagree with homosexual relationships.

"The students are seen as the vanguard within the schools," MassResistance reports.

One seminar was entitled "Starting a Middle School GSA [Gay Students Association]: A Sustainable, Grassroots Approach" consisted of "practical advice and encouragement for students, staff, parents and community members who would like to establish a sustainable GSA in their local middle school."

Other seminars targeted the theater and sports environments.

Transgender issues were also given attention. GSLEN said the seminar "When a Teacher Makes a Gender Transition" will “share the successful experience of a faculty member's gender transition at Milton Academy, K-12, as well as communications strategies, documents and lessons learned."

On its website, GSLEN says it consists of "student-led clubs, usually at the high school or middle school level, that work to address anti-LGBT name-calling, bullying and harassment in their schools and promote respect for ALL students."

However, Mass Resistance's report indicates that promotion of the homosexual agenda, not bullying prevention and universal respect, are the real goals of the organization.

More than 300 people attended the GSLEN conference, where 21 seminars took place. Two-thirds of the attendees were students.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on May 27, 2014, 06:35:11 am
School Shows Children Same-Sex Marriage Propaganda Video

Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) sent Janesville School District in Wisconsin a letter Wednesday applauding its apology for showing students a one-sided video that promotes same-sex marriage and attacks religious views to the contrary.

"Schoolchildren should receive an education that is free from ideological or political bias and that does not disparage any of their beliefs," says ADF senior legal counsel Jeremy Tedesco. "Student indoctrination is inappropriate, especially on an issue as important as marriage. Students and parents deserve better. The district recognized its mistake and deserves to be commended."

In April, students at Craig High School were shown a video that promotes same-sex marriage and condemns supporters of marriage between one man and one woman. The video shows students saying it is "insane" and "outrageous" that "only" 14 states (at the time the video was created) allow same-sex marriage. The video also shows students responding to Christian objections to same-sex marriage. Responses included, "Cry me a river, build me a bridge and get over it," "You guys are basic and nobody likes you" and "No one cares what you think."

The letter explains that Janesville School District "rightly determined that showing the video contravened its Academic Freedom and Controversial Issues in the Classroom policies" and that the video's "disparagement of religious beliefs opposing same-sex marriage likely violated the Establishment Clause."

The letter also notes that the "Board of Education recognizes students' 'right to receive competent instruction in an atmosphere free from bias and prejudice.'" Moreover, the school's policy "affirms that 'although teachers have the right to express their own viewpoints and opinions, they do not have the right to indoctrinate students.'"

"Schools are wise to take an unbiased and objective approach when teaching about controversial social issues," adds ADF litigation counsel Jonathan Scruggs. "We commend the district for recognizing that the one-sided, anti-religious same-sex marriage video shown in class violated its policies and undermined parental authority. We hope more school districts follow their lead."


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on May 28, 2014, 07:36:22 am
Boys aged 5 suspects in child rapes as new figures reveal shocking extent of sex crimes by children

THE shocking extent of sex crimes committed by children against other children has been revealed in new figures.

Over a two-year period police in the UK investigated over 235 reports of sex crimes by children under ten, according to the The Mail on Sunday .

In one case two boys aged five were accused of a series of rapes on other children in the Thames Valley.

The paper also reported the case of a six-year-old girl investigated over alleged sexual offences. The youngest suspect was just four.

The appalling statistics were blamed by a leading UK children’s charity on easy access of online ****.

Jon Brown from the National Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) told the paper: “Exposure to extreme, sometimes sexually violent and degrading material is now only a few clicks away.

“This can warp youngster’s views of what is normal and acceptable sexual behaviour, how they treat others and how they expect to be treated.”

It is unclear whether any of the suspects were prosecuted but it is unlikely since children aged nine and under are considered below the age of criminal responsibility in the UK.

The latest figures follow a recent report from the US where a girl was reportedly raped by an 8-year-old boy in a school bathroom while the boy’s sister held her down. The alleged victim said she was in the bathroom when the two siblings cornered her at Edgemere Elementary School in Oklahoma City.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 28, 2014, 11:26:30 am
Never in my lifetime would I have imagined this!

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on May 28, 2014, 12:26:07 pm
Never in my lifetime would I have imagined this!

OH YA? What about this then?

Gen 19:4 But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter:

im thinking this included ALL of the males in the city. old and YOUNG. These cities were completely corrupt. The Lord couldnt find 10 good people in the whole city. That includes the kids.

Gen 18:32 And he said, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak yet but this once: Peradventure ten shall be found there. And he said, I will not destroy it for ten's sake.

So this doesn't surprise me at all.

Luk 17:28 Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot

2Ti 3:1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2Ti 3:4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 28, 2014, 12:40:23 pm
OH YA? What about this then?

Gen 19:4 But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter:

im thinking this included ALL of the males in the city. old and YOUNG. These cities were completely corrupt. The Lord couldnt find 10 good people in the whole city. That includes the kids.

Gen 18:32 And he said, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak yet but this once: Peradventure ten shall be found there. And he said, I will not destroy it for ten's sake.

So this doesn't surprise me at all.

Luk 17:28 Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot

2Ti 3:1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2Ti 3:4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;

Good points.

But nonetheless - it's in my lifetime(that is), being the first time I'm witnessing THIS level of perversion. But scripture is correct - it happened in Lot's time too.(old AND young) Either way, my head is spinning!

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 28, 2014, 12:50:44 pm
Another thing - look how NO concerns, outrage, etc happened when the MSM showed clips over and over and over again of that sodomite NFL player (Michael Sam) kissing his boyfriend on national tv.

I mentioned this on another thread - but pt being that they're targeting the non-sodomites as well. Ultimately, if the NFL(and NBA, MLB, and NHL for that matter too) came out right away(like last year) with "star" players opening up about their sodomy, then the entire fan base would be outraged, and their ratings, merchandise revenue, etc would go down the tubes. However, they're conditioning these masses little by little - first they started "discussing" it over 20 years ago, then last year they started putting out "rumors" how players were going to "come out", then they've focused their attention on someone(Sam) who'll likely not make his team...each time the masses were open to these "discussions"...when all is said and done, when "star" players like quarterbacks or wide receivers "come out", they'll likely be welcomed.

And when this happens - what will happen when Christians warn about what's going on with truth and love? These fan bases will likely react with alot of anger and resentment - been around these people when I was lost - pretty much they don't care who's on their teams just as long as they win. Personally, I watch the NFL games every week(during the season), but honestly - now that the sodomy agenda is going in full force here, may have to seriously reconsider even watching 2 seconds of these games.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on May 29, 2014, 05:22:44 am
Gay agenda creeping into all curriculum

At their annual conference in Boston, LGBT teachers and homosexual activists revealed their continuing plans to push the gay agenda even further into schools.

It was GLSEN's 2014 Annual Conference where attendees introduced and discussed strategies for furthering homosexuality and transgender issues in the minds of students, according to Brian Camenker of MassResistance.

Camenker, Brian (MassResistance)“They want kids to feel comfortable around homosexuality and those issues, feel comfortable coming out, feel comfortable taking on those behaviors, feeling comfortable with everything about it,” he says.

He says the conference directly organizes and trains teachers to integrate the gay agenda throughout curriculum.

“You wouldn’t think you could integrate homosexuality into much, but they do by saying something like “a woman does this and her wife does this,” he explains. “They will bring in homosexual themed books. One of their favorites is to claim that historical figures - Eleanor Roosevelt, for example - were actually homosexual.”

Camenker says many parents are unaware of what is taking place, or many are afraid to say anything for fear of reprisals.

- See more at: http://www.onenewsnow.com/education/2014/05/29/gay-agenda-creeping-into-all-curriculum#.U4cKUiihFyI

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 29, 2014, 08:32:18 am
Looks like the sodomy agenda is in its last throes in terms of forming a big militant.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on June 01, 2014, 01:54:50 pm
Homosexual Sex, Divorce, Extramarital Sex Reach New Highs of ‘Moral Acceptability’

 Americans are showing more tolerance for a range of behaviors, with sex between unmarried adults, medical research on stem cells from human embryos, and doctor-assisted suicide all showing record highs and increases in “moral acceptability” from last year.

The Gallup poll’s annual “moral acceptability” scale has been conducted since 2001 and charts shifting cultural attitudes on a number of hot-button social issues. In the 2014 list released Friday (May 30), Gallup researchers said 12 of the 19 categories reflected “levels of moral acceptance that are as high or higher than in the past.”

“Americans largely agree about the morality of several issues,” Gallup researchers said. “Most say birth control is acceptable but that extramarital affairs are wrong. However, other issues show clear, substantial divides. These differences are largely explained by party identification, but previous research has shown that age also plays a factor.”

Three issues — sex between an unmarried man and woman, medical research on embryonic stem cells and doctor-assisted suicide — showed a slight increase in acceptability from 2013. Most of the other issues were mostly unchanged.

Gallup grouped the 19 issues into five categories, including:

Highly acceptable: birth control (90 percent)

Largely acceptable: divorce (69 percent); sex between an unmarried man and woman (66 percent); embryonic stem cell research (65 percent); gambling (62 percent); the death penalty (61 percent); buying and wearing clothing made of animal fur (58 percent); having a baby outside of marriage (58 percent); gay or lesbian relations (58 percent); medical testing on animals (57 percent)

Contentious: Doctor-assisted suicide (52 percent); abortion (42 percent)

Largely unacceptable: Cloning animals (34 percent); pornography (33 percent); sex between teenagers (30 percent)

Highly unacceptable: Suicide (19 percent); polygamy (14 percent); cloning humans (13 percent); married men and women having an affair (7 percent)

Against a backdrop of sweeping legal victories in favor of same-sex marriage, the 58 percent of Americans who rated homosexual relations as morally acceptable was mostly unchanged from last year’s rating of 59 percent. Last year’s figure, however, represented a 19-point shift since 2001, the largest change for any issue on Gallup’s list, which it started at that time.

Other notable shifts over time include having a baby out of wedlock (up 13 points from 2002); sex between unmarried adults (up 13 points since 2001), and divorce (up 10 points from 2001).

The 2014 figures were based on 1,028 phone interviews with U.S. adults in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on June 01, 2014, 02:35:45 pm
Looked up sodomy in the 1828 Webster's yesterday - the only definition it gives is crimes against nature. Then I looked up nature in that same dictionary, and it pretty much summed up how it means God's creation.

Pt being that when you look at the WHOLE picture - yes, same-sex marriage is the most abominable of all sins - however, is alot of this other stuff going on like divorce, fornication, having children out of wedlock, abortion, stem-cell research, doctor-assisted suicide, feminism(ie-pushing women to have careers in the workforce), polygamy, and birth control part of God's creation(and purpose for his creation)? No! Absolutely NOT!

Ultimately, marvel ye not that fast-forward to our present day, same-sex marriage is getting legalized and accepted in today's society, why? B/c look at all the seeds of sodomy that were planted for many years - Wescott and Hort 1881, Susan B. Anthony's first wave of feminism(she hated abortion et al, but she also hated Christianity), NIV in the 70's which was also the same decade abortion got legalized, feminism in the 70's, etc.

And speaking of these perverted bible versions - yes, this IS a form of sodomy too that's played a big role. For example, look how these perversions watered down the role of the man in them.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on June 07, 2014, 05:45:05 am
Today’s Summer Camps Train Boys Under The Age Of 10 How
To Become Great Transsexuals

Do you have a young male child who occasionally walks around in heels and plays with a barbie doll from time to time? You need to send him to a special summer camp to have him trained to be homosexual. No… this is not a joke. Unfortunately, it’s the real deal. Over the past three years, photographer Lindsay Morris has been documenting a four-day camp for gender nonconforming boys and their parents. The camp, “You Are You” (the name has been changed to protect the privacy of the children and is also the name of Morris’ series), is for “Parents who don’t have a gender-confirming 3-year-old who wants to wear high heels and prefers to go down the pink aisle in K-Mart and not that nasty dark boys’ aisle,” Morris said with a laugh. It is also a place for both parents and children to feel protected in an environment that encourages free expression.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on June 12, 2014, 07:38:02 am
Shock Video Catches Planned Parenthood Teaching Teens S&M Sex: Gagging, Whipping and Asphyxiation

A shocking new video Live Action released today catches the Planned Parenthood abortion business teaching teenagers about S&M-based sexual relationships and concepts such as gagging, whipping and asphyxiation.

In a series of undercover audits, Live Action investigators documented Planned Parenthood counselors and nurses advising our investigators, who the Planned Parenthood staffers thought were minors, on how to practice torture sex.

In the videos, Planned Parenthood counselors encourage undercover investigators posting as 15 and 16-year-old teens, to engage in the sadomasochistic practices, telling the underage teens  “if it’s consensual, it’s OK… it’s totally OK.”

“What we’re about to release shows a systemic, institutional problem in America’s largest abortion corporation,” Lila Rose, Live Action’s president, stated. “It’s not a matter of ‘don’t judge,’ but rather explicit endorsement of violent and harmful sexual practices to boys and girls as young as fifteen years old.”

plannedparenthoodexposeThe group complains: “Planned Parenthood consistently fights any law requiring parental consent or involvement for minors seeking sexual and reproductive health care, including abortions.  PP’s website encourages teens to circumvent their parents and the law.”

“Taxpayers, and especially parents, need to know where their money is going,” Rose said.  “This funding is not optional – it’s a compulsory, government-enforced extraction going toward extremely questionable programs and dangerous advice for our nation’s teens.”

Rose expects Live Action’s upcoming investigative releases to serve as “a wake-up call for America’s parents.”  “This is not a partisan issue.  Whether people are liberal or conservative, or even whether they’re pro-life or pro-choice, I think we’re going to see a lot of common ground in the outrage over what we’re about to show people.”

The following is the trailer video previewing the series of expose’ videos that are forthcoming:


Live Action continues:

    Planned Parenthood of Hudson Peconic sponsored a training seminar, designed for educators of teenagers, titled “50 Shades of Safe.”  The seminar offered workshops/classes on “how a BDSM relationship is successfully navigated between sexual partners” and on the “elements of a healthy BDSM relationship.”

    The official Planned Parenthood website lists BD (bondage and discipline) and SM (sadomasochism) under its Sex & Sexuality – “Understanding Sexual Activity — at a Glance” page without any warnings or safety objections: “Here are plannedparenthood73some examples of less common sexual behaviors: SM (sadomasochism) — the use of domination and/or pain for sexual arousal.  BD (bondage and discipline) — sexual role play that includes elements of SM.”

    Planned Parenthood receives over $500 million a year from taxpayers, in the name of so-called sex education and health. Furthermore, under ObamaCare, Planned Parenthood has announced that it will receive undisclosed funds through the $75-million-a-year PREP (Personal Responsibility and Education Program), with 15 affiliates already having received grants.

    Planned Parenthood’s stance on what kind of sexual activity is good or not: “Just because a sexual behavior isn’t common or some people disapprove of it or the reasons people enjoy it, doesn’t mean there is anything wrong with it. Many people enjoy less common kinds of sex, but they are often less likely to discuss it with others. One way to think about uncommon kinds of sex is this: if no one is hurt by the kind of sex someone might enjoy, than [sic] it is probably okay.”

    Planned Parenthood equates unrestricted sexual activity with “freedom, equality and dignity” according to their “Declaration of Sexual Rights.” Abortions and hormone drugs are listed as entitlements that contribute to “the freedom, equality and dignity of all people” – including teens and children.

    Planned Parenthood covers up the sexual abuse of young girls by offering them clandestine sexual and reproductive health care, including abortions, and coaching these young ladies on how to keep the activity secret from their parents.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on June 12, 2014, 07:32:08 pm
Wow...and I thought this garbage only goes on in one of those forbidden cable channels! :o

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on October 18, 2014, 07:57:17 am
Pedophilia Deserves Civil Rights, Says New York Times’ Op-Ed

The nation’s tough anti-pedophilia laws are unfair to pedophiles, according to an op-ed published by The New York Times’ editors.

“One can live with pedophilia and not act on it,” says Margo Kaplan, an entrepreneurial assistant law professor at Rutgers University, and a former lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union.

Tragically, the roughly 1 percent of “people who are sexually attracted to children] must hide their disorder from everyone they know — or risk losing educational and job opportunities, and face the prospect of harassment and even violence,” she wrote.

Kaplan is trying to make a legal career in the regulation of expanding sexual diversity, instead of routine and lower-status practice areas, such as torts, probate, crime or copyrights. She’s focused on “legal limitations on intimate decisions, particularly the use of criminal law in areas of health and sexuality,” according to her web page.

Kaplan says criminal law should be changed so that pedophiles are only stigmatized or denied jobs if law school graduates agree that they pose a “direct threat” to children.

That could be a bonanza for law school graduates, because they’d be paid to argue over whether the hiring of a particular **** for a particular job is a direct threat to particular children. “The direct-threat analysis rejects the idea that [prospective] employers can rely on generalizations; they must assess the specific case and rely on evidence, not presuppositions,” Kaplan writes.

But this shift would also be a loss for the 99 percent of non-**** American citizens and voters, because it would eliminate their longstanding civil right to simply and cheaply exclude pedophiles from mainstream society or from jobs near children.

That right would be handed over to the hourly-paid law school graduates, including judges, defense lawyers, arbitrators and prosecutors, if Kaplan’s career plan becomes law.

The readers’ comments about the article were generally negative.

“Once you give pedophiles legal protection as handicapped individuals, it will become too difficult to keep them from jobs in which they might come into contact with children,” said the top-ranked comment on Kaplan’s article.

“No one who has dealt with these laws in real life would suppose that such evidence is easy to establish or that it provides sufficient protection to employers, who have to consider both the vagaries of the legal system and the costs of legal action,” said commenter Josh Hill.

“I’m beginning to wonder if there is a quiet but persistent movement to normalize adult sexual contact with children,” said an anonymous commenter, Hypatia. “Trying to turn the basest of predators into victims… is repugnant to anyone with even the slightest exposure to the damage done to the victims of this toxicity.”

“When you start to say it is not a crime, when you start to sympathize with people because they can’t control perverse desires, you give them an excuse to justify their behavior,” said commenter DougalE.

But “they need to be shamed and need to be made to fear prison time… zero tolerance, tough love, and long prison terms serve to protect children and when you begin to remove, compromise or weaken those attitudes it will only serve to endanger more children,” he wrote.

Unsurprisingly, Kaplan is eager to advance what she regards as the noble new task of wiping out Americans’ ability and civil right to protect their kids from pedophiles. “The fact that pedophilia is so despised is precisely why our responses to it, in criminal justice and mental health, have been so inconsistent and counterproductive,” she wrote.

“Acknowledging that pedophiles have a mental disorder, and removing the obstacles to their coming forward and seeking help, is not only the right thing to do, but it would also advance efforts to protect children from harm,” she insisted, without providing evidence.

In the 1970s, the Catholic Church accepted the advice of many experts in the new mental-health industry, and concluded that **** priests could be successfully treated with private therapy. The theory was not proven correct, and it helped protect many priests as they sexually abused thousands of boys.

That was a disaster for many children and for the church, but it yielded a bonanza of lawsuits, media stories and therapy sessions for professional lawyers, reporters and psychologists.

Kaplan’s new plan could also be good for many New York Times’ readers, who include a greater-than-average number of post-grad lawyers, law-school professors, social workers, regulators, psychologists, judges, expert witnesses and therapists. Many would gain more money and social status if they — not ordinary Americans — can monopolize the inevitable disagreements between pedophiles, their lawyers, employers, victims, parents, and community members.

Kaplan is ready for that burden.

“Arguing for the rights of scorned and misunderstood groups is never popular, particularly when they are associated with real harm,” said Kaplan, whose career likely has been boosted by The New Times Times’ decision to publish and showcase her career plan.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on October 18, 2014, 07:58:04 am
Gene of the week: paedophilia

Add paedophilia to the growing list of genetically-determined attractions, preferences and predispositions. In a New York Times op-ed, a law professor from Rutgers University contends that paedophilia is not a matter of choice. Margo Kaplan writes that:

    “Recent research, while often limited to sex offenders — because of the stigma of pedophilia — suggests that the disorder may have neurological origins. Pedophilia could result from a failure in the brain to identify which environmental stimuli should provoke a sexual response. MRIs of sex offenders with pedophilia show fewer of the neural pathways known as white matter in their brains. Men with pedophilia are three times more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous, a finding that strongly suggests a neurological cause. Some findings also suggest that disturbances in neurodevelopment in utero or early childhood increase the risk of pedophilia.”

Ms Kaplan admits that paedophiles do not have to succumb to their urges, so they are still responsible for their actions. However, they do have an unrecognised disability. She is campaigning to amend US legislation so that they will not be discriminated against in employment, education and medical care.

    “The Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibit discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals with mental disabilities, in areas such as employment, education and medical care. Congress, however, explicitly excluded pedophilia from protection under these two crucial laws.”

“It’s time to revisit these categorical exclusions,” she concludes.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on October 18, 2014, 08:00:34 am
That has to be the sickest way to make a buck. To even consider allowing pedo's around kids so she can make money. She is the worst kind of person. But that is what demon possessed liberals are..

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 18, 2014, 10:32:44 pm
That has to be the sickest way to make a buck. To even consider allowing pedo's around kids so she can make money. She is the worst kind of person. But that is what demon possessed liberals are..

Hate to say it - but the seeds for this were planted many years ago when this country started showing tolerance toward co-habitation outside of marriage. Way back in the 80's when I was a kid - they started pushing this idea with buzzphrases like "The shoe needs to fit first...". Uhm...it only takes like a couple of seconds to try on a shoe at a shoestore. ::)

Pt being that fornication has really runned rampant, and it's come to a point where this has became completely acceptable(and even encouraged) in today's society. When one abomination breeds, MORE will follow. When one group wants their "rights", MORE "groups" will demand their's.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 15, 2014, 07:37:02 pm
Jimmy Graham got tired of being groped by fans


New Orleans Saints tight end Jimmy Graham is one of the most prolific players in the game. When scoring a touchdown at home last week against the San Francisco 49ers, Graham shared his enthusiasm by vaulting into the crowd, Lambeau Leap-style. Unfortunately, those days have apparently come to a quick end, after Graham was groped by a fan, per Mike Triplett of ESPN.

Graham was famous for dunking the ball over the crossbar after touchdowns, but that move was outlawed by the NFL before this season. Leaving him with a bevy of other options including the good-old-fashioned-but-chronically-underrated spike, Graham decided to become one with the fans until a man by the name of Scott McGowan, dressed in the guise of a joker, took things a bit too far.

This goes out as a lesson to all fans everywhere. You can like your team, you can love the players, but you can't go grabbing their backside because of that love.

"I just wanted to go and thank all the fans for being there," Graham said. "But people were trying to thank me a little too much."

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on December 03, 2014, 06:54:01 pm
The ambiguous legacy of The Pill
Contraceptives didn’t solve all of women’s problems. In fact, they created whole series of new ones.

I am in the process of writing a book which argues that the Sexual Revolution has been a rich person’s hobby horse from the beginning. The rich and powerful like the idea of separating sex from child-bearing. While this idea is sometimes wrapped up in a disguise of helping woman and the poor, the fact remains that the rich and powerful pioneered and implemented these ideas, quite often at the expense of women and the poor.

So I wondered, when I picked up a book, The Birth of the Pill: How Four Crusaders Reinvented Sex and Launched a Revolution, celebrating four key people behind the development of the Pill, whether I would have to revise my thesis.

I am sorry to say that not a single line in this book contradicts my thesis. Oddly enough, however, the author believes he has written an account that more or less celebrates these four people, Margaret Sanger, Dr Gregory Pincus, Dr John Rock and Katherine McCormack, as social heroes. He has not falsified or white-washed the story in any way that I can see. The evidence is right in front of him. But he does not see it.

The two women, Sanger and McCormack, were both eugenicists. Without Mrs McCormack’s fortune supporting the research: no Pill. Without Mrs Sanger’s ideological drive for her own peculiar combination of free love and eugenics, no Pill. Without Dr Pincus’ combination of bravado and brilliance, no Pill. Without Dr Rock’s respectability and frankly, his Catholicism, to allay public fears about the decline in morality that it might cause: no Pill.

That Mr. Eig does not see the elitism that made The Pill possible, is a tribute to the power of the regime in which we all now live.

People frequently misunderstand the full impact of the ideological regime which The Pill made plausible. People will sometimes say, “If you don’t approve of contraception, you don’t have to use it.” Or, “if you don’t approve of abortion, don’t get one.”

The misunderstanding behind these statements is to confuse an individual’s choice of behavior within a regime, with the choice of regime itself. We are all living in the Sexual Revolutionary Regime, whether we like it or not, whether we approve of it or not, whether we decline to participate in its main tenets or not. We all live in a society that is trying to say that sex is intrinsically a sterile activity, with all that this implies.

Part of living within a regime, is that one takes it for granted. These are the background assumptions, the parameters of our lives. Certain things make sense within the regime that would be unimaginable under an alternative regime. 

The cardinal tenet of the Contraceptive Regime is that The Pill safely sterilizes the sexual act. As a result of this belief, we accept the idea that we can have sex with anyone we want, without regard for potential consequences. We think we can have sex with a person who would be a disaster to parent with. And when the inevitable pregnancy actually occurs, we act surprised every time. Women are then faced with the choice of becoming a single mother, having an abortion or placing the baby for adoption. None of these choices is particularly good for the child, nor in the end, for the woman.

We accept as normal, adults leaving one sex partner for another, and leaving children behind in the process. It is unbelievably painful for the individuals involved, but as a society, we don’t much care. Each individual family is left to believe that their painful situation is somehow their own fault. “If I had used my contraception correctly, I wouldn’t have gotten pregnant.”  “If you had been more mature and less sexually possessive, I could have had my affair without all this turmoil and trouble.”

Non-marital childbearing, “multiple-partner fertility,” abortion, divorce, are all part of the price of The Pill. But a celebration of the Sexual Revolution and The Pill cannot afford to take too much notice of these connections.

We can think of our perceptions of The Pill as being like one of those drawings that is either a goblet or a pair of faces, depending on your perspective. If you let your gaze shift ever so slightly, you can see the other image.

Poor Mr Eig’s gaze is so fixed upon the goblet that does not see the human faces. He does not see the significance of much of what he is saying. He tells us about Hugh Hefner’s enthusiasm for The Pill, without quite recognizing that this is the man who mainstreamed the commercialization of women’s sexual availability.

He tells us about the shoddy testing of the Pill which was conducted largely on Puerto Rican women, and on women in a mental asylum. When Dr Pincus applied for FDA approval, the drug had been tested on only 130 women. Instead of describing the number of women tested, he computed the number of menstrual cycles during which no pregnancy occurred. Eig recognizes that this was a sleight of hand, but hey, it was all in a good cause. Dr Pincus reported, “In the 1,279 cycles during which the regime of treatment was meticulously followed, there was not a single pregnancy.” This procedure had the virtue of dodging the number of women who dropped out and why, as well as the number of pregnancies that did occur, due to the women not taking their pills “meticulously.”

The reason there were so few subjects is that women kept dropping out of the trials. They did not like the side effects. All Eig can see is that women “desperately” wanted reliable contraception. But he does not see the significance of the fact that the women themselves turned their backs on it.

This pattern continues to this day. Women in developing countries frequently stop using contraception, much to the consternation of the population controllers from developed countries and international agencies who keep coming in to “help” them.

Thinking entirely within the Contraceptive Regime, all he can see is that the world is overpopulated, and something has to be done about it. But today, underpopulation is a bigger problem than overpopulation. Japan, which lionized Margaret Sanger for her work on family planning, was one of the “over-crowded” countries on the eve of the Pill. Japan is now one of the most rapidly aging, shrinking populations in the world, tied with Germany for the second oldest population in the world, with an average age of 46.1.

Moreover, coercive population control is a reality that hormonal contraceptives have made possible. China’s infamous One Child Policy is a crime against humanity, by any reasonable definition of that term.  The United Nations has been aggressively promoting a government contraceptive policy in the Philippines, a Roman Catholic country in which birth control is legally available. But only about 50 percent of the population uses contraception. And the birth rate? Is it some unimaginably high, out of control, breeding-like-bunnies number? The Total Fertility Rate in the Philippines is 3.06 babies per woman over the course of her whole lifetime. Yet, to get this population “under control” the United Nations, with the complicity of the United States government, has interfered in the legislative process of a sovereign democratic country.

These results are perhaps not what Margaret Sanger and Dr John Rock and Dr Gregory Pincus and Katherine McCormack expected. But as we look back on it, I do believe we have an obligation not to whitewash these obvious consequences of the Contraceptive Regime.

I appreciate the fact that Jonathan Eig has told the story of The Pill honestly. Now, I hope he will allow his gaze to shift, ever so slightly, so that he can see the information he has collected in a new light. The Pill didn’t solve all of women’s problems. It created whole new series of problems. And the problems it was supposed to solve could have been solved some other way.

This “Revolution” is nothing to celebrate.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on December 07, 2014, 09:01:33 am
Abortion industry giving wink, nod to **** men, says pro-lifer

The abortion industry is still protecting pedophiles in spite of undercover investigations making the practice public.

Years ago Life Dynamics did an undercover investigation revealing children being aborted and their molesters not reported, and Live Action did an investigation several years later revealing the continuing practice.

Life Dynamics founder Mark Crutcher cites a case in point in Florida in which a 33-year-old man impregnated a 12-year-old girl. The abortionist was Michael Benjamin.

Crutcher says of the abortionist: "Michael Benjamin gives her, as it turned out in the medical board hearings, between six and eight minutes of counseling and then aborts this child - aborts her child - and releases her back to the ****."

Jones is currently serving a 15-year prison sentence for the crime.

The medical board gave Benjamin a slap on the wrist for not reporting it and ordered him supervised by another doctor, which turned out to be an abortionist he was already working with.

Statistics show 60 to 80 percent of minor girls impregnated were molested by men.

Crutcher says the abortion lobby is "basically thumbing their noses at the states' mandatory reporting laws," which means not reporting these adult men as required by law.

Crutcher claims that Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation are operating a "nationwide **** protection racket" and says Benjamin is a classic example of it.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on January 04, 2015, 06:27:50 am
Prince Andrew may have been secretly filmed with underage girl he is alleged to have abused

Papers filed against his pervert pal Jeffrey Epstein say he recorded VIP orgies he threw at his luxury homes using cameras hidden in the walls

Prince Andrew’s tycoon pal may have taken compromising photos of him with the underage girl he is alleged to have abused.

Details buried in original court papers filed against pervert Jeffrey Epstein, 61, reveal that he recorded the sordid orgies he threw for VIPs at his luxury homes using cameras hidden in the walls of guest bedrooms.

The woman known as Jane Doe 3 – said to be 30-year-old Virginia Roberts – claims she was held as a sex slave and forced to sleep with the Duke of York in London, New York and the US Virgin Islands.

She says she was 17 at the time – under the age of consent in Florida.

One of the sexual encounters with the Prince, 54, is alleged to have taken place at an **** ­involving other underage girls on Epstein’s private island.

The financier, who was jailed for 18 months in 2008 after pleading guilty to solicitation for prostitution, kept a sickening stash of images on a computer seized at his Palm Beach mansion in 2006.

Prince Andrew was a frequent guest at the house.

Lawyers representing Roberts, originally referred to as Jane Doe 102, mentioned the hidden cameras in a 27-page filing at the Palm Beach Federal Courthouse in Florida.

The six-year-old papers, seen by the Sunday People, state: “Some of the photographs in the defendant’s possession were taken with hidden cameras set up in [Epstein’s] home in Palm Beach.

“On the Day of his arrest, police found two hidden cameras and photographs of ­underage girls on a computer in the defendant’s home.

“[He] may have taken lewd ­photographs of Jane Doe 102 with his hidden cameras and transported [them] to his other residences and elsewhere.”

There is no suggestion that Prince Andrew knew Roberts was being held as a sex slave by the tycoon and she claims she first met the royal when the financier took her to Europe and North Africa in 2001.

During a stop in London they called on his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of crooked media mogul Robert Maxwell.

Roberts claims in the latest court documents, filed on December 30, that she first slept with the prince at Maxwell’s home.

Court papers also allege that Maxwell presented **** pictures of her she had taken herself to Epstein as a birthday present.

They add that Roberts’ claims that she was forced to tell Epstein all about her sexual encounters so he could use the information to “blackmail” the royal.

She further claims she was sex-trafficked to “many other powerful men, including numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well known Prime Minister, and other world leaders”.

Prosecutors believe Epstein, who enjoyed watching other people have sex, had cameras fitted at his other residences across the world.

Prince Andrew – who was photographed with Roberts during a party in New York – was holed up in a luxury ski chalet in Switzerland on Saturday.

Buckingham Palace repeated his strongly-worded denial of the allegations.

Prince Andrew holidayed with Epstein in Thailand in 2001 and was snapped surrounded by **** women on a yacht.

A handyman who spent 11 years working for the tycoon claimed Prince Andrew often had massages when he was a guest at his Palm Beach mansion.

Juan Alessi said the Prince enjoyed daily massages from young women and often emerged “smiling” after rub-downs.

He said the massages were carried out in a private part of the mansion only Epstein and selected guests could access.

Alessi also told how he witnessed parties at the ­waterfront mansion at which the Prince was present while young girls frolicked in the ****.

Despite his friend’s 2008 conviction for child sex offences, Prince Andrew continued to see him and the pair were pictured together in Central Park, New York.

The ensuing furore led to him quitting his role as Britain’s trade envoy.

Epstein served 13 months before he was released.

Jane Doe’s claims against the Prince come after she joined three women in a lawsuit against prosecutors, claiming they broke the law by failing to consult them before signing a plea deal for the tycoon.

It is understood that without the agreement he would have faced up to 15 years in jail.

The ongoing lawsuit was filed by Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell and names the US Government as the defendant.

The lawyers say Epstein’s treatment was “contrary to the Government’s normal approach in prosecuting federal sex offences”.

The US State Attorney’s office in Florida still has the vile haul of images from Epstein’s Palm Beach home, which were captured on devices hidden in walls inside guest bedrooms.

A spokesman said: “These matters are subject to ongoing litigation. We have no comment.”

Ghislaine Maxwell branded claims against her as “untrue”.

Her spokesman said: “The allegations... against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue. The original allegations are not new and have been fully responded to and shown to be untrue.

“Each time the story is retold it changes with new salacious details about public figures and world leaders.

“[The woman’s] claims are obvious lies and should be treated as such. Ghislaine Maxwell’s original response to the lies remains the same. [She] strongly denies allegations of an unsavoury nature... and reserves her right to seek redress.”

Buckingham Palace has denied “any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors” by Prince Andrew.

Prince holes up in luxury ski resort

Prince Andrew was holed up in a luxury Swiss ski chalet tonight as the sex abuse claim hit the headlines worldwide.

He did not leave the holiday home in the posh village of ­Verbier, where he is on a family holiday with ex-wife Fergie and their daughters Beatrice and Eugenie.

On every other day of the New Year break he left either to ski on Verbier’s famous slopes or dine at the resort’s restaurants.

Some reports suggested Andrew may be preparing to fly back to the UK today.

Eugenie, 24, and her friend Cressida Bonas, 25, were seen at the chalet on Saturday afternoon.

Eugenie’s sister Beatrice, 26, was in Verbier earlier last week but by yesterday had left for a break in the Caribbean.

Singer Pixie Lott, 23, is also in the resort and celebrated New Year at the exclusive Farinet hotel.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on January 17, 2015, 09:15:42 pm
Woman plans to marry her father after two years of dating

A teenager has revealed in an interview that she plans to marry her father and have children after dating for two years.

The unnamed 18-year-old revealed in an interview with New York Magazine her romantic relationship of almost two years with her biological father after being estranged from him for 12 years.

In the interview, the girl also said the two also plan on having children.

The teenager said her father reached out to her on Facebook when she was in high school and soon after, she went to stay with him for a week.

After the week together, the 18-year-old said they had sex and then started dating.

"Everyone on my mom’s side of the family sees us as father and daughter," she told the magazine. "Those who know that he’s my dad, and that we are engaged, include my father’s parents (they can see we are happy together and they can’t wait for us to have babies — they treat us just like any other couple), the woman we live with, and my best friend."

After the wedding, the woman says they plan to move to New Jersey where adult incest is legal.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on January 28, 2015, 11:51:34 am
Recruitment? Middle-school students hear from homosexual high schoolers

A Boston-area middle school was caught quietly trying to introduce students to a homosexual club without telling parents.

Lynnfield Middle School (pictured below) tried to sneak the Gay-Straight Alliance assembly past parents until MassResistance, a pro-family organization, learned about the plan. The event was held late last year.

Lynnfield Middle School (Boston)Brian Camenker of MassResistance says this is not unusual and claims schools try to do this all the time.

"They routinely try to avoid telling parents," he says, "and if do, they they're very dishonest about what it really is," hiding behind terms such as "tolerance."

On its website, MassResistance reported that it learned of the assembly from a "frantic mother" who heard about it but was not informed by the school itself.

Once Mass Resistance confronted the school about the secret assembly, Camenker says school officials quickly sent out an email to parents.

Camenker, Brian (MassResistance)"Had we not called, they would not have done it," he claims.

The MassResistance website also has the email sent to parents. It informed parents on December 14 of a "brief informational assembly" planned for December 16 in which seventh and eighth graders would hear homosexual and lesbian high schoolers "share their positive experiences" as members of the GSA.

"They would have gotten a heavy dose of this stuff without parents knowing about it," Camenker argues.

He says Mass Resistance has filed an update to a law in the Massachusetts Legislature requiring parental notification of school events to include homosexual-related events and activities.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 03, 2015, 07:23:00 pm
The Puzzling Link Between HIV Diagnoses And Craigslist

A new study has linked a rise in HIV diagnoses with the emergence of Craigslist personal ads throughout the US. The research, conducted between 1999 and 2008, found that HIV cases rose in a city when Craigslist was introduced.

“Online platforms offer access to a larger social group than is generally available through offline contacts, making the internet an emerging venue for seeking casual sex partners. The ease of seeking sex partners through classified ad sites may promote risky behaviors that increase transmission of STDs,” study authors Jason Chan and Anindya Ghose write.

The idea behind the HIV study arose when Chan and Ghose were researching Craigslist as a means to sell used goods. They noticed a large number of ads for one-night-stands, both in major cities — not so surprising, they thought —and smaller cities, where casual hookups aren’t quite as common. Chan and Ghose eventually focused their research on 33 states, and found that when Craigslist came to town, HIV rates rose.

"Craigslist’s entry into a market is related to a 16 percent increase in HIV cases," Chan tells Yahoo Health. "This maps out to an average of 6,200 cases of HIV infection in the US each year, which amounts to $62 million in annual treatment costs. We further found that the increase in HIV trends is linked with the personal ad section, not the escort section."

Now, as casual hookup apps like Grindr and Tinder begin to replace online ads, experts worry that HIV rates might continue to rise. “With apps like Tinder and Grindr being used more and more, the likely consequence is that we will see a even greater spread of the disease,” Chan tells Yahoo Health. “However, this is only a speculation because human behavior is dynamic and can be subjected to changes over time. With the release of this study result and the increase in awareness raised about the risks involved in hooking up online strangers, individuals who use these apps might take more precautions or eliminate their current risky behaviors.”

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on February 11, 2015, 02:37:01 pm
Pa. Middle School Students Given ‘Fifty Shades Of Grey’ Puzzles

Parents in a Pennsylvania school district are turning 50 shades of red over word search puzzles given to their middle school students.

The students were given puzzles based on the erotic novel and movie “Fifty Shades of Grey.” The puzzles contained terms including “spanking,” ”submissive,” ”leather cuffs” and “bondage.”

Officials in the Monessen School District say they can’t say who passed out the puzzles or how many students received one because they just learned about it Monday.

The issue became public when parents complained at Tuesday night’s school board meeting.

Superintendent Leanne Spazak said the incident was under investigation.

Parent James Carter says he tried to question the school’s principal and dean of students about the puzzle his son received, but they refused when he insisted on recording their conversation.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 11, 2015, 03:37:40 pm
I don't know too much about this movie - but what I HAVE heard and read is that it's one very, VERY sick movie.

15-20 years ago, there would have been a bigger backlash against it than the Titanic disaster.(and would have been slapped with an NC-17 rating, and ultimately banned in some states) Now? It's as if it's part of our pop-culture. Very sad, but the bible prophecizes all of this would happen.

Come quickly Lord Jesus!

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 13, 2015, 05:25:35 pm
Frustrated movie critics want MORE sex fornication in Fifty Shades of Grey as flaccid flick fails to get them hot under the collar

Critics said tame feature film, out on February 13, was 'run of the mill'
One pointed out that lead Jamie Dornan mostly keeps his pants on
BDSM props deployed on Dakota Johnson were also termed 'vanilla'
It was often remarked that EL James novels were far more explicit

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2948669/Frustrated-movie-critics-clamor-sex-flaccid-Fifty-Shades-Grey-fails-hot-collar.html#ixzz3Rg7CFwr4

From what I've read - if it came out 15-20 years ago, it would have gotten an NC-17 rating(instead the R rating it has now) - these "film critics" are part of the MSM puppet establishment. Be ye not deceived!

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on March 16, 2015, 11:23:28 am
**** belongs in the classroom, says Danish professor

Sexologist says discussion with teenagers about the industry would make them more critical consumers

A leading sexologist in Denmark has called for ****ography to be shown in the classroom, claiming that starting a debate about the industry could help teenagers become “conscientious and critical consumers” who are able to tell the difference between ****ography and the reality of sexual relationships.

Prof Christian Graugaard of Aalborg University caused a furore in Denmark when he suggested on public television that ****ography should be shown in schools. This was preferable, he told the Danish public broadcaster DR, to sex education classes that were “boring and technical, where you roll a condom onto a cucumber”.

Graugaard’s proposal is not simply following in the long tradition of sexually permissive Scandinavia. It is, he insists, a sensible way of teaching teenagers that ****ography is nothing like real sex.

“My proposal is to critically discuss ****ography with 8th and 9th graders [age 15 – the legal age of consent in Denmark – and 16 respectively] as part of a sensible didactic strategy, carried out by trained teachers,” he told the Guardian.

“We know from research that a vast majority of teenagers have seen **** at an early age – so it’s not a question of introducing youngsters to ****,” he added. According to one Nordic study, 99% of boys and 86% of girls in Scandinavia have already seen ****ographic films by the time they’re 16. What Graugaard wants is to make sure teens “possess the necessary skills to view **** constructively”.

“We should strengthen their ability to distinguish between the media’s depictions of the body and sex and the everyday life of an average teenager. They should become conscientious and critical consumers.”

Sex education has been mandatory in Denmark since 1970 and ****ography is already included in the curriculum in several Danish schools – but not all. “Schools interpret the national guidelines very differently,” says Graugaard. “So it’s important that education meets certain quality standards all over the country, that teachers are well trained and that up-to-date methods are constantly developed. Right now, Denmark is a developing country with regard to the methodology of sex education, and this should be changed.”

Denmark was the first country in the world to lift the ban on ****ography in 1967. “**** may actually offer a variety of both entertaining and educational properties,” Graugaard said. “**** can even be feminist and in some cases it can be part of a democratisation of sex and [it can] promote diversity. But it can also be excluding – of body types, gender and sexuality. We want our kids to have exciting and gratifying sex lives, so an open-minded, constructive dialogue is the best way to make sure that they are able to make meaningful decisions for themselves.”

He added: “It’s not our job to scare off teenagers, rather we should encourage them to explore the joys of sexuality in a safe way and on their own terms – instead of turning our backs on them.”

A similar scheme was suggested in the UK in 2014 when sexual health charity Brook, the PSHE Association and the Sex Education Forum issued new guidelines for sex education in schools including discussion about the dangers of “sexting” and X-rated films.



Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on March 25, 2015, 07:45:01 pm
I read 'Fifty Shades of Grey' with my boyfriend and it changed our relationship

(Jessica Orwig)Me and Dave last Christmas.Let me start by explaining how this happened: My boyfriend, let's call him "Dave," and I are in a long-distance relationship. Therefore, we have to come up with activities that we can do together without actually being together.
Last month, he suggested we read a book. After discussing possible genres, then arguing over what constitutes a "good" mystery novel, I only half-jokingly suggested "50 Shades of Grey." After all, it was just in time for Valentine's Day and I had been seeing the seductive trailers for the film "50 Shades of Grey," based on the 2011 novel. I was admittedly more than a little curious.

To my surprise, Dave agreed, after a few seconds of hesitation. And here we are, more than 500 pages of mediocre plot and cringe-inducing **** later, and I must say that our relationship is better for it. Here's why:

Experts will tell you how important communication is for a healthy relationship, and while E.L. James's novel isn't the best piece of literature around, it's a classic example of a relationship gone sour because of poor communication.

As we read the book, Dave and I could objectively discuss where the main characters went wrong, who was to blame, and ultimately what they could have done to avoid the miserable situations they find themselves in by the end.

Over the course of our five-year relationship, Dave and I have had our fair share of arguments. Many of them spawned from miscommunication by one or both of us. And if you and your partner have ever fought because of some kind of miscommunication, then you know how difficult it is to see any side but your own.

Reading "50 Shades of Grey" gave Dave and me the unique chance to see each other's perspective on how couples should communicate.

More importantly, we were detached from the characters, thanks to their bizarre qualities and poor character development. This detachment meant that if we disagreed how one character acted or miscommunicated we could calmly discuss our opinions without getting into a heated dispute where someone's pride was left beaten on the floor.

During one memorable conversation we even managed to resolve a major misunderstanding we had early in our relationship.

For example, about two-thirds into the story, the two main characters, Anastasia Steele and Christian Grey, have an in-depth discussion on Steele's feelings about their relationship, which at that point has escalated from just sex to semi-serious. The discussion, however, is conducted through a series of back-and-forth emails.

Dave strongly felt a conversation like that should take place in person and did not understand why the author had it happen any other way. While I agree a topic that important should be discussed in person, the emails were a perfect example of Steele's inability to express herself when she's with Grey.

As it turns out, I sent a few angry emails to Dave during our first year together because I, too, used to struggle with communicating my emotions. (I eventually stopped when I learned those emails ruined his entire day.)

As we discussed the example in the book, I mentioned my angry emails as a way to defend both the author's choice and Steele's actions. To my surprise, Dave had thought that I was sending those emails to be a killjoy. To his surprise, I'd sent those emails to communicate.

Needless to say, I was reminded of the importance of clear communication in a relationship and it's all thanks to a very unexpected source. Thanks, E.L. James.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on March 25, 2015, 07:47:23 pm

1Corinthians 7:1  Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.
1Co 7:2  Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
1Co 7:3  Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.
1Co 7:4  The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.
1Co 7:5  Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
1Co 7:6  But I speak this by permission, and not of commandment.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on March 29, 2015, 04:44:01 pm
He discusses the evil spirits that influenced Ted Bundy(among other things) - this is a must listen!



Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on March 30, 2015, 02:14:59 pm

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on April 09, 2015, 05:37:46 am
Obama calls for end to 'gay conversion therapies'

US President Barack Obama has condemned psychiatric therapies designed to "repair" gay, lesbian and transgender youth. Mr Obama's statement was in response to an online petition calling for a ban on conversion therapies. It gained over 120,000 signatures in three months. The petition was inspired by Leelah Alcorn, a 17-year-old transgender youth who committed suicide in December.   


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on April 20, 2015, 07:35:35 pm
'Gay Marriage' Rooted in Sexologist's Fraudulent Research

The very notion of "gay marriage" is an artificial construct. It's the aberrant byproduct of the sexual revolution, which itself was largely instigated by bug doctor turned "sexologist," Alfred Kinsey.

Though married to a woman who took part in his many filmed "scientific" orgies, Kinsey was a promiscuous homosexual and sadomasochist. He managed to completely upend and twist the world's perception of human sexuality in the 1950s and '60s with his world-famous "Kinsey Reports."

While his "research" has been universally discredited and exposed as fraudulent, ideologically motivated and even criminal, it remains, nonetheless, the primary source behind today's "sexual orientation science."

For this reason, and many others, the novel notion of "gay marriage" sits atop a house of cards.

On April 28, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on whether to attempt, once and for all, the deconstruction and redefinition of the institution of marriage. The court will then hand down a decision by the end of June. In anticipation of this landmark case, civil rights law firm Liberty Counsel has submitted to the Supreme Court a friend of the court brief that reveals the criminally fraudulent foundation upon which the "marriage equality" Tower of Babel has been raised.

Among other things, the brief features the findings of Dr. Judith Reisman, the foremost expert on Kinsey's pseudo-scientific cultural activism. Reisman has served as scientific consultant to four U.S. Department of Justice administrations, the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). She is a visiting professor of law at Liberty University School of Law and works hand-in-hand with Liberty Counsel.

As the brief reveals, most people are completely unaware that during his tenure at Indiana University, Kinsey facilitated, with stopwatches and ledgers, the systematic sexual abuse of hundreds, if not thousands, of children and infants—all in the name of science. Kinsey's research also determined that **** doesn't really hurt women.

Kinsey claimed that, like himself, over 30 percent of men are homosexual (today's legitimate research has established this figure to actually fall somewhere between 1-3 percent). There can be no doubt that, if he were alive today, Alfred Kinsey would be one of the loudest voices clamoring for the redefinition of marriage.

"For the past 67 years, scholars, lawyers and judges have undertaken fundamental societal transformation by embracing Alfred Kinsey's statistically and scientifically fraudulent 'data' derived from serial child rapists, sex offenders, prisoners, prostitutes, pedophiles and pederasts," notes the brief. "Now these same change agents, still covering up the fraudulent nature of the Kinsey 'data,' want this Court to utilize it to demolish the cornerstone of society, natural marriage."

"Changing millennia of history must always be approached with trepidation," the brief continues. "In this case, the change must be rejected outright not only because it is seeking to redefine something which cannot be redefined, but also because the proposed change is grounded in fraudulent 'research' based on skewed demographics and the sexual abuse of hundreds of infants and children."

The brief pleads with the Supreme Court not to "erase millennia of human history and dismantle the granite cornerstone of society in favor of an experimental construct that is barely a decade old." Instead, Liberty Counsel asserts, "This case presents the Court with the opportunity to affirm and preserve the unique, comprehensive union of a man and a woman, the foundational social institution upon which society was built and the future of the nation depends."

In the past, the Supreme Court has upheld marriage as a foundational social institution that is necessarily defined as the union of one man and one woman:

    Marriage is "fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race." Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942).
    "An institution in the maintenance of which in its purity the public is deeply interested, for it is the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be neither civilization nor progress." Maynard v. Hill, 125 U. S. 190 (1888).

"Older than the Constitution and the laws of any nation, marriage is not a creation of any government, but it is an obvious relationship between one man and one woman. Marriage is a natural bond that society or religion can only 'solemnize,'" said Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel.

It is a tragic commentary on America's moral freefall that the highest court in the land would consider, even for an instant, perverting the cornerstone institution of marriage to reflect the psychotic image and anti-social activism of a man who, himself, was a criminal pervert.

Liberty Counsel is calling Christians to unite in fasting and prayer for three days before the Supreme Court hears the case—on April 23, 24 and 25.

At this point, prayer alone may save marriage and keep, at bay, the wrath of a just and Holy God.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on April 21, 2015, 09:04:13 am
 NOTR - Obama & The Kinsey Agenda - 4.13.15
Monday, April 13, 2015 at 6:34PM


Chris discusses the recent declaration from the White House that encourages a nation wide ban on "gay conversion therapy" -- where parents compel their underage children to seek counsel to help them overcome homosexual feelings.  While several states have already made it illegal for parents to seek help for their children, the Obama Administration is now encouraging that the rest of the country follow along.  But how is this developing idea related to the influence of Alfred Kinsey, the man credited with the progressive sexual revolution that has overwhelmed our country?


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on April 21, 2015, 10:56:54 am
Lesbian teacher: How I convince kids to accept gay ‘marriage’, starting at 4-years-old

A primary grade lesbian teacher from an Ontario public school revealed in a workshop at a homosexual activist conference for teachers earlier this month how she uses her classroom to convince children as young as four to accept homosexual relationships.

“And I started in Kindergarten. What a great place to start. It was where I was teaching. So, I was the most comfortable there,” Pam Strong said at the conference, attended by LifeSiteNews.

The conference, hosted by the homosexual activist organization Jer’s Vision, now called the Canadian Centre for Gender and Sexual Diversity, focused on the implementation of Bill 13 in Ontario classrooms. Bill 13, called by critics the ‘homosexual bill of rights,’ passed in June 2012 and gave students the right to form pro-gay clubs in their school, including Catholic ones, using the name Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA).

Strong, who is in an open relationship with another woman and who has been a teacher for about five years, focused her workshop on what she called the “power of conversation” for promoting LGBTQ issues in an elementary classroom. She began her talk by relating how she reacted the first time one of her students called another student ‘gay’ as a putdown.

“With [the principal’s] encouragement, we decided that I would go from class to class and talk about what ‘gay’ means, what does ‘LGBTQ’ mean, what do ‘I’ mean,” she told about 40 attendees, all educators, at her workshop.

Strong related how she began with the junior kindergarten class.

“And I read a [pro-gay child’s] book [King and King], and I started to realize that conversations can be very difficult, and they can have the most power when they are the most difficult.”

“But difficult conversations are a part of what we do as teachers, right? And when these conversations are properly supported by teachers within the safety of the classroom, they provide a rich environment for our students as they unpack these complex social issues and they reflect on their own preconceptions, rights, of gender, sexuality, love, all these different things,” she said.

Strong related that as she was reading “King and King” in the junior kindergarten class as a springboard to discuss her sexuality with the kids, she got to the part where the two princes become ‘married’ when one of the boys suddenly shouted out: “They can’t do that! They can’t get married. They’re two boys.”

Recounted Strong: “And I said, ‘Oh, yeah, yeah, they can. It’s right here on page 12.”
Some of the pro-gay children's books Strong uses with her students. Pete Baklinski / LifeSiteNews

To which the boy replied, according to Strong: “Oh, yeah, I know Mrs. Strong, but that’s just a story. That’s not real life.”

“And I said: ‘It happens in real life too. I am married to a woman. I am gay. And I am in love with my wife.”

Strong said the young children “just all kind of went silent.” She then told them: “That may seem different to you, how many of you have heard of that before?”

“Not one hand went up,” she related. “And so I said: ‘That may seem different to you, but we’re not that different. Would you like to know about what I do with my family?”

“Yeah, tell us,” she recounted the children enthusiastically saying.

“I said, you know, we take our kids to the park. I swing them on swings,” she related, telling conference attendees that she could share things she did with her own children that “mostly likely all of their families did with them.”

Then she told the children: “We laugh together. We go grocery shopping together. I read to them. I tickle them, sometimes until they scream and laugh and when they cry, I hug them until they stop.”

Strong said that at that point, the boy who had used the word ‘gay’ looked and her and said: “Well, you’re a family.”

“And I said, yeah, we are,” she related. “And off I go to the next classroom.”

Strong said that she went from “class to class to class and continued with these conversations, and they were very powerful.”

‘It’s normal in my classroom’

Strong related an incident that happened last fall involving a new boy who had recently entered her grade 5 classroom. The new boy had not yet been made aware of Strong’s sexual preference for other women.

“All my class is very used to who I am. My family picture is very proudly in my room now. On Mondays they quite often will say, ‘What did you do with your wife?’ It’s normal in my classroom.”

Strong said that a conversation between herself and the students came up one day where it was mentioned that she was a lesbian. The new boy put his hands over his mouth and said, according to Strong: “Oh, my God, I think I’m going to puke.”

“As I took the abuse — personally, as an individual – of those words, I also saw half of my class look at me with incredible concern. One student who was right in front of me already had tears in her eyes. And I noticed several other students who were looking at him. They were just very, very upset with this kid,” she related.

Strong said the boy instantly became aware that “something he had said had just created this unbelievable tension in the room.” She related how she addressed the boy, telling him: “I think that what you might not be aware of is that I am gay, and I am married to a woman, and my family has two moms.’”
The chart Strong uses to show her students that same-sex partnerships are the same as male-female families. Pete Baklinski / LifeSiteNews

“His eyes just started darting around, and he was incredibly uncomfortable,” she related.

“I looked at the other kids and I said: ‘Ok guys, what I want to ask you is: Am I upset with him?’ And the one little girl in my class put up her hand — that doesn’t usually get into these conversations very much in my classroom — and she said, ‘Mrs Strong, I know you’re not upset with him, because he hasn’t had the benefit of our conversations.”

“And I looked at my little friend, my ‘new’ friend, and I said: ‘But, we’re going to have one now,’” she related.

Strong said that she then directed her class to the board and asked them to write everything she had told them related to LGBTQ.

“And my class all of a sudden popped up. ‘LGBTQ’ was on the board, ‘lesbian,’ and all the different words coming out there. And I sat back and said, ‘Let’s review.’ So, the last year and a half of ‘inclusive’ education came alive in my classroom.”

Strong told her workshop attendees that her “new little friend” is now a devoted champion of diversity. She boasted how he was the one in her class to count down the days to the pro-homosexual Day of Pink that took place earlier this month. When Strong took a photo of all the children wearing pink shirts in her classroom, she said the boy requested to be in the front.

“For me, that is the power of conversations. That’s the power of sharing our stories,” she said.

LGBTQ classroom ‘conversation starters’

Strong called it “key” to develop a “positive classroom culture” — and she mentioned it often takes months — before getting into what she called “difficult conversations” with students about convincing students of the normality of her sexual preference for women.

She mentioned how she spends time “building a common vocabulary” in her classroom of words like “stereotype, prejudice, discrimination” so her students will be able to more readily conform to her pro-LGBTQ message.

“Sometimes with these big ideas there are also very big words that are very hard to understand. I find that whether it’s kindergarten, right up to grade six, visuals help a lot,” she said.

Click "like" if you want to defend true marriage.

The lesbian teacher has amassed a collection of “conversation starters” that she says helps get her started when presenting to her students the LGBTQ message. She said pro-gay children’s books are one of her favorites.

“I use current events, news articles, advertisement are great for gender, especially with Kindergarten kids, pink and girl toys and all the rest of it. Commercials are great, I use one right now, the Honey Maid commercial.” The 2014 “Dad & Papa" commercial depicts two male same-sex partners engaging with their children in normal family activities such as making s’mores, eating dinner around the table, and walking in the park.

Strong says she watches the commercial with her students up to three times, asking them to make a list of all the similarities between the gay-partnership and their own families.

“Of course they think it’s going to be so different, [that] this family is going to be so different,” she said.

Strong said the kids notice dozens of similarities, but usually only one difference, namely that the commercial has “two dads.” Other than this, she said the students “could not find one thing in that commercial that was different than their own families.” In this way she convinces the kids that a gay-partnership is identical to a family made up of a male and female. Strong called it a “fantastic lesson for kids of all ages.”

“There was nothing left for me to teach at the end of it. It was a huge learning for some kids,” she said.

‘Recruiting children? You bet we are’

Though homosexual activists claim their efforts in the schools are a way of combatting bullying, a number of homosexual activists have highlighted that the movement’s goal is in fact to “indoctrinate” children into accepting the normalcy of the homosexual lifestyle.

“I am here to tell you: All that time I said I wasn't indoctrinating anyone with my beliefs about gay and lesbian and bi and trans and queer people? That was a lie,” wrote Canadian gay activist Sason Bear Bergman, a woman who identifies as a transgender man, in a March 2015 piece titled “I Have Come to Indoctrinate Your Children Into My LGBTQ Agenda (And I'm Not a Bit Sorry).” Bergman holds nothing back, stating she wants to make children “like us” even if that “goes against the way you have interpreted the teachings of your religion.”

In 2011 U.S. gay activist Daniel Villarreal penned a column for Queerty.com stating that the time had come for the homosexual lobby to admit to “indoctrinating” schoolchildren to accept homosexuality.

“Why would we push anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal?”

“We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality. In fact, our very future depends on it. Recruiting children? You bet we are,” he added.

Homosexual activist Michael Swift wrote in 1987 in the Gay Community News that school children would become explicit targets for homosexual indoctrination. “We shall seduce them in your schools…They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us,” he wrote at the time.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on April 21, 2015, 11:26:54 am
Homosexual activist Michael Swift wrote in 1987 in the Gay Community News that school children would become explicit targets for homosexual indoctrination. “We shall seduce them in your schools…They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us,” he wrote at the time.

That is disgusting... >:(

Vladimir Lenin: “Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.”

Adolph Hitler: “Give me a child when he’s 7 and he’s mine forever.”

just saying

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on April 22, 2015, 08:44:43 am
District Apologizes After Transgender Book Read to Children Without Parental Notice

Officials with a school district in Maine are apologizing after a book about transgendered child was read to elementary school students without advance notice to parents.

An estimated 20 out of 22 classes in kindergarten through third grade  at Horace Mitchell Primary School in Kittery Point were recently read the book “I Am Jazz,” written by and about Jazz Jennings, a 14-year-old transgender activist. The book was part of a lesson to children about tolerance and acceptance.

“I have a girl brain but a boy body,” it reads. “This is called transgender. I was born this way!”

But according to reports, the book left some students with a lot of questions and they came home asking their parents if they might be transgender. Some parents consequently contacted the school out of concern that they were never notified that the material would be read to their children.

“My right as a parent to allow or not allow this discussion with my child was taken from me,” one unidentified parent of a first-grader told conservative reporter Sean Hannity. “It is very upsetting to me that I didn’t have an option at all.”

She said that her son asked her if he might really be “a girl in love with a girl.”

“I was taken aback by [what was read to them],” the parent stated. “Being seven, once you put something in their mind they don’t forget so easily.”

The day after her words were published, Superintendent Allyn Hutton sent out a letter to parents about the lesson with an apology that prior notice had not been given about the reading.

“The Kittery School District embraces diversity and is committed to creating an atmosphere of respect and tolerance for all people, regardless of their race, religion, political belief system or sexual orientation,” she wrote. “… With this in mind, guidance staff of the Horace Mitchell School recently read aloud the book, ‘I Am Jazz,’ a book about a transgender student.”

“We have a practice of if a topic is considered sensitive, parents should be informed. In this situation, that didn’t happen,” she continued. “The whole culture at Mitchell School is about teaching tolerance and respect. The people presenting the lesson thought [‘I Am Jazz’] was one more piece of teaching that lesson. In retrospect, we understand that toleration is tolerating people of all opinions.”

However, the school’s guidance blog asserts that it is not inappropriate to teach elementary school students about gender identity issues.

“Some may think primary school students are too young to worry about addressing issues surrounding gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and questioning (LGBTQ) students. Not so, experts say,” it reads. “It’s never too early to begin teaching children about respecting differences. When our students and their parents have questions related to LGBTQ issues, our goal is to foster healthy dialog, critical thinking and inclusiveness.”


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on April 28, 2015, 09:36:53 am
This is NOT an endorsement of Paul Washer - but he does make good points.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 11, 2015, 12:03:41 pm
I thought this was very convicting...


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 30, 2015, 02:56:46 pm
This original Material was developed by Carrie Dukes age 10.  She wanted to share her heart about a sensitive and important topic.  She references a video series by Dr. S. M. Davis, specifically the video "Seed of Disintegration Planted by the Boyfriend Girlfriend Game."  God bless all who seek to please Him.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on June 03, 2015, 12:17:59 pm
Parents Livid Over ‘Democratic’ School’s Shock Field Trip — but the Director Says It Was ‘Beautiful’

Roughly one dozen students in Minneapolis, Minnesota, some as young as 11 years old, were taken on a private school-sponsored field trip to an adult novelty store last week, leaving some parents furious.

The director of the private Gaia Democratic School in Minneapolis, Starri Hedges, took the middle- and high school-aged kids to “Smitten Kitten” as part of a sex education lesson.

Parent Lynn Floyd called the field trip a “major breach of trust,” adding that parents were not even notified ahead of the trip. Both of her daughters, aged 11 and 13, attended the off-campus trip.

“You just can’t erase those images,” the mother said.

However, Hedges called the sex-ed field trip “beautiful” in a statement on Monday, according to the Star Tribune.

“What I saw happening on our trip, I thought it was beautiful because kids could talk to these sex educators without any shame, without any fear,” she said.

Students were reportedly shielded from content deemed “pornographic” while at Smitten Kitten, but sex toys and other adult products were reportedly visible to the kids.

Some students even bought condoms, according to the report. The store also sells books and DVDs and hosts workshops.

Minneapolis Business License Manager Grant Wilson told the Star Tribune that the school displayed “poor judgement” and his office would be looking into whether the store broke any laws pertaining to explicit material and minors.

Here are some details about the city code:

    According to Minneapolis city code, those younger than 18 should not be exposed to “sexually provocative written, photographic, printed, sound, or published materials deemed harmful to minors.”

Hedges also said it was the “first time we have taken that kind of field trip and it will probably be our last,” which she explained makes her feel bad “because the kids had so much fun.”

Hedges appeared in a video posted on YouTube in which she explains the mission of Gaia Democratic School:



wo wo wo woo wooo! You send your kids to the private Gaia Democratic School, and you have the nerve to be Livid over this? Seriously i wonder what else they are learning in a place named that

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on June 08, 2015, 06:28:24 pm

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on June 17, 2015, 08:11:14 am
Video of Young Boy Dancing Sexually in Streets as ‘Gay’ Pride Attendees Cheer Raising Concerns

A video recently posted to YouTube that shows a young boy dancing in a sexual manner during a “gay” pride event while onlookers cheered him on is raising concerns from viewers nationwide.

The video was posted on Thursday by an online publication called “Ovenworthy,” and was entitled “This Is the Future You Chose.” It shows a young child believed to be no older than 12 years old grinding and twerking to the song “Sissy That Walk” by drag queen RuPaul at the Sao Paolo Pride Festival in Brazil. The boy, shirtless and wearing very short jean shorts, is surrounded by event attendees who cheer on his moves.

The video was restricted to viewing for those 18 and up because of its sexualized content.

Gay Star News, in reporting about the concerns that followed the posting of the video, said that the boy was simply “having a great time” and called those who opposed the scenario “homophobes.”

Some readers agreed.

“I bet homophobes rather see a young boy carrying a gun. Homophobes should mind their own sex-life! Do we question their bed-activities?” one wrote.

“In the 90’s there was a popular booty-shaking dance Lambada, not much different from twerking—all the kids were dancing! This kid is just having fun, and yes, in Brazil sexuality is a lot more part of the culture then any westerner can understand,” another stated.

But others, including some of Gay Star News’ readers, took issue with the footage.

“I’m not a homophobe, but I find videos of prepubescent children dancing provocatively completely disgusting. I also find Gay Star news method of defense equally disgusting,” one wrote.

“As a transgender woman I find this disgusting. Why would you get a prepubescent child to do acts like this? People already think we’re pedophiles,” a second stated.

“That kid didn’t just learn that from anywhere. He has obviously been exposed to inappropriate behavior and it is up to his guardians to look after him properly. The kid might not see it as sexual, but that is not the point, and if you think this type of behavior and little boys in tight short shorts is ok then you have a serious problem…” a third opined.

Christian commentator Matt Barber of Barbwire.com also expressed concern over the video, stating that it is indicative of the continuing moral degradation of society.

“[T]his is extremely disgusting and troubling. It is, however, where we are headed as a nation,” he wrote. “The sexual anarchist agenda steamrolls ahead and children are in the cross-hairs. The organized ‘LGBT’ lobby has long lusted for the abolition of all age of consent laws. While not all ‘gays’ are child abusers, pederasty has been a central aspect of the homosexual lifestyle since the days of the Greek bathhouse.”

“This is further proof that the homosexual movement is not about equality, but about the normalization of sexual perversion,” Barbwire guest blogger Caiden Cowger also wrote. “It also reveals that it is just a matter of time before pedophilia will be promoted under the ‘LGBT’ banner in the U.S. In many countries it already is.”


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on June 26, 2015, 01:56:54 pm


He cites data collected by his organization that found a whopping seven in 10 pregnancies among unmarried women in their 20s are unplanned.

“Unplanned pregnancy is not just a teen issue,” women’s health expert Jennifer Wider, M.D., tells Yahoo Health.

There are several reasons for the rise among 20-somethings.

One is that, with more access to contraception, women are having more sex. Since contraception isn’t foolproof, there is an increased chance that a woman will become unintentionally pregnant when she’s more sexually active.

Another is that women in their 20s may be cohabitating with a partner, which Wider says also increases the risk of an unplanned pregnancy.

Albert says a disconnect between cause and effect among 20-somethings is to blame as well. “When you ask most young women, ‘Do you want to get pregnant right now?’ They say ‘no, absolutely not,’” he says. “But when you ask ‘How likely is it that you’re going to have unprotected sex in the next three months?’ many of the same women freely admit that they’re going to have unprotected sex.

Even more shocking, Albert points out that many 20-somethings are resorting to what he calls “magical thinking” when it comes to their odds of getting pregnant. His organization found that four in 10 young adults believe that it doesn’t matter whether they use birth control or not—when it’s their time to get pregnant, it will happen.

Despite the status quo, Albert remains “optimistic” that the high rates of unplanned pregnancies in the U.S. will decline, largely due to a growing number of women using IUDs, implants, and other long-term birth control methods.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on June 26, 2015, 02:59:42 pm
Hidden camera: 'Gays' admit they're not 'born that way'

Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 06/25/2015 @ 8:22 pm In Front Page,Politics,U.S. | No Comments

A documentary video that seeks to influence the Supreme Court justices as they rule on marriage features an undercover investigation that challenges the belief that “gays” are “born that way” and, therefore, should be granted special rights.

Equipped with a hidden camera, journalist Ryan Sorba went to a “gay” bar where he recorded candid answers to his questions. He found many men who identify as “gay” were molested as a youth.

He contends his findings have implications for the high court as it decides whether or not the traditional definition of marriage discriminates against people who identify as “gay.”

Many of the “gays” he interviewed, he says, not only were molested in their youth but went on to become molesters themselves.

In the opening of his documentary, Sorba says, “I interviewed individuals at an average gay bar on an average night and I discovered that I was literally surrounded by child molesters and victims of molestation.”

Sorba makes it clear he is not saying that everyone who identifies as “gay” is a child molester, but “many people who do identify as gay were molested, and many of the children and teens will go on to teach others kids their own age or younger what they learned from the molester.”

Sorba says he made the video “as an informative piece for the justices.”

Many Americans do not adequately understand the issue of homosexuality, he says.

He begins by asking of “gays”: “Do you believe being gay is strictly genetic?”

He says what he found was shocking.

“I learned that many attribute their own sexual orientation to molestation.”

He says that after finding out how many claim they are “gay” because they were molested, he decided to change his script in an attempt “to figure out who was doing the molesting.”

He learned that old men aren’t the only culprits.

“Woefully, I learned that after being molested by an older man, many children and teens will teach their friends what they learned from the molester,” Sorba says.

He warns that the content of his video is explicit but insists it is “necessary.”

“Parents be on guard,” he says. “If you know and child or teenager who has developed same-sex attraction, let this footage be a warning to you. It is a red flag that the child has been molested, by an adult, a teenager or another child.”

He ends his opening with a plea to the Supreme Court.

“If you do not already know and understand what I am about to show you, then I would urge you to practice judicial restraint and uphold the will of more than 50 million American voters and millenia of human experience,” he says.

vid: http://www.wnd.com/2015/06/hidden-camera-gays-admit-theyre-not-born-that-way/
“America needs more time to fully understand this issue, its causes and its consequences.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome - How does one become gay?
Post by: tennis shoe on June 26, 2015, 04:05:35 pm
Hidden camera: 'Gays' admit they're not 'born that way'

It's high time to address this.

Both gay men and women make a sport out of “turning” young heterosexuals. They particularly seek out traumatized, vulnerable targets.

If they can manipulate a young person's body into responding sexually, (often by force and coercion) then they will say that the response is because the target is gay. The molestation is then kept hidden through deep shame, which is reinforced through repeated encounters. If the young person believes this lie, then there are other, very powerful spiritual influences that come into play. These spirits seek to spread their influence. And so the cycle continues.

It all begins with believing a lie coming from something very wicked.

There is absolutely no love in any of this. It's all about power and control.

Some gay people will talk about this privately. Publicly, the authorities give them excuses to allow such behavior such as paid-for junk science documentation and political praise.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on July 03, 2015, 04:35:52 am
Schools Implant IUDs in Girls as Young as 6th Grade Without Their Parents Knowing

Earlier this month, LifeNews.com reported on a high school in Seattle, Washington that is now implanting intrauterine devices (IUD), as well as other forms of birth control and doing so without parental knowledge or permission.

The IUD is known as a long acting reversible contraception, and may even act as an abortifacient. So, a young teen in Seattle can’t get a coke at her high school, but she can have a device implanted into her uterus, which can unknowingly kill her unborn child immediately after conception. Or, if she uses another method, she can increase her chances of health risks for herself, especially if using a new method.

The high school, Chief Sealth International, a public school, began offering the devices in 2010, made possible by a Medicaid program known as Take Charge and a non-profit, Neighborcare. Students can receive the device or other method free of cost and without their parent’s insurance. And while it’s lauded that the contraception is confidential, how can it be beneficial for a parent-child relationship when the parents don’t even know the devices or medication their daughter is using?

As it turns out, Chief Sealth isn’t the only school in Seattle doing this. As CNS News reports, more schools are fitting young girls — as young as 6th grade — with the devices and doing so without their parents knowing.

    Middle and high school students can’t get a Coca-Cola or a candy bar at 13 Seattle public schools, but they can get a taxpayer-funded intrauterine device (IUD) implanted without their parents’ consent.

    Click here to sign up for daily pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

    School-based health clinics in at least 13 Seattle-area public high schools and middle schools offer long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), including IUDs and hormonal implants, to students in sixth-grade and above at no cost, according to Washington State officials.

    LARCs are associated with serious side effects, such as uterine perforation and infection. IUDs, specifically, can also act as abortifacients by preventing the implantation of a fertilized egg.

    The state and federally funded contraceptive services are made possible by Take Charge, a Washington State Medicaid program which provides free birth control to adults who are uninsured, lack contraceptive coverage, have an income at or below 260 percent of the Federal Poverty Level — or, in this case, to teens who don’t want their parents to know they’re on birth control.

    In an email exchange with the Washington State Health Care Authority and CNSNews.com, a Take Charge spokesperson acknowledged that underage students are eligible for a “full array of covered family planning services” at school-based clinics if their parents meet the program’s requirements.

    Take Charge added that “a student who does not want their parents to know they are seeking reproductive health services is allowed to apply for Take Charge using their own income, and if they are insured under their parents’ plan, the insurance would not be billed.”

    When asked if a sixth grader could get an IUD implanted without parental consent, Take Charge told CNSNews.com: “We encourage all Take Charge providers to offer long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in their clinics. A young person does not need parental consent to obtain a LARC or any other contraceptive method…If the young person is not choosing abstinence, she would be able to select a LARC and have it inserted without parental consent.”

Parents, if you have children in these schools, you need to investigate and complain immediately. And all parents ought to take a look at the health policies of their young daughters’ schools to find out if a similar program is in place where you live.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 03, 2015, 11:54:25 am

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 04, 2015, 08:57:03 am

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 04, 2015, 06:56:34 pm

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 05, 2015, 07:12:57 pm

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 26, 2015, 05:15:12 pm
Audio Inside Link: http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=926151642403
STBC Special Report-Monsters are Real: The Mainstreaming of Pedophilia in Our Society

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 28, 2015, 09:16:46 pm

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 06, 2015, 02:05:42 pm
Eighth graders asked to write about booze, herpes and one-night stands

A New Jersey school district is facing scrutiny for  a provocative eighth grade homework assignment that reads more like a chapter from “Fifty Shades of Gray.”

The boys and girls at Myron L. Powell Elementary School in Cedarville were instructed to write a “reactive response” to a given situation.

They wanted to know what the students would do if they went to a party, got drunk, had sex with a stranger and then contracted herpes.

Back when I was in school, language arts was more about dangling participles, not sexually transmitted diseases.

I was first alerted to the story by WPG, my radio affiliate in Atlantic City, N.J.

The homework assignment was for a language arts class. Back when I was in school language arts was more about dangling participles, not sexually transmitted diseases.

Amy Loper told me she was shocked when she discovered her son’s homework assignment. And I mean she was shocked!

“It’s insane,” she said. “There is no reason whatsoever to discuss that kind of stuff with a kid. It’s not sex education class. It’s language arts.”

Mrs. Loper made several telephone calls to the school and demanded some answers. It turns out – the assignment is part of the district’s (wait for it) core curriculum.

The homework is part of a book the students were given titled, “The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Teens.”

Let’s hope underage drinking, partying and unprotected sex are not among the habits.

Here’s the verbatim assignment:

“You had a really rotten day, but lucky for you your best friend is having an awesome party later. You go to the party and start drinking. You have a little too much to drink and start talking to this girl/guy you’ve never seen before. You head upstairs to better acquainted despite several friends telling you that you don’t even know this person. You end up having sex with this person. The next day you really can’t remember everything that happened and rely on your best friend to fill you in. A week later you find out that you contracted herpes from your one night stand and that this is a disease you will have all your life and never known when an outbreak will occur.”

Mrs. Loper called her son’s teacher to get an explanation. When she failed to get a satisfactory answer from the teacher, she contacted the superintendent.

“The superintendent told me that we could opt out of the sex education class,” she said. “But that’s not the point.”

And that’s because the material was not taught in sex ed. It was taught in language arts.

“It’s not the school’s job to make these points to the kids,” she said.

Mrs. Loper said she was blown away with the soft-core content of the assignment.

“Society is in such a downward spiral and everyone is willing to go along on the ride instead of trying to bring up their kids and actually parent,” she said.

I reached out to the school but no one returned my calls.

Anybody miss the days of “Old Yeller”?

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 13, 2015, 10:47:09 am

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 19, 2015, 12:54:07 pm
Ex-Subway pitchman Fogle gets more than 15 years in prison

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — The latest on the sentencing of former Subway spokesman Jared Fogle for sex crimes (all times local):

1 p.m.

A judge has sentenced former Subway pitchman Jared Fogle to 15 years and eight months in prison for trading in child pornography and having sex with underage prostitutes.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt sentenced Fogle on Thursday after he pleaded guilty to one count each of travelling to engage in illicit sexual conduct with a minor and distribution and receipt of child pornography.

Fogle agreed to the plea deal in August after authorities raided his suburban Indianapolis home in July.

Prosecutors sought a 12˝-year sentence, while Fogle's attorneys sought five years.

The 38-year-old Fogle admitted paying for sex with girls as young as 16 and receiving child pornography produced by his charitable foundation's former director.

He also agreed pay his 14 victims $100,000 each in restitution.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on November 28, 2015, 01:01:09 pm

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on December 01, 2015, 02:08:26 am
Mattel Casts Gay-Friendly Little Boy In New Moschino Barbie Doll Commercial
Mattel is not selling you a doll, they are selling your children the LGBT agenda, that's what this commercial exists to do.

The new Moschino Barbie is a huge hit and its commercial is breaking boundaries by featuring a young boy

“For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:” Romans 1:26 (KJV)

The queering of American society has now descended to the level of mentally conditioning children to accept everything from blurred gender lines to no gender lines. Mattel, makers of the iconic Barbie Doll, have cast a lisping, preening, homosexual-in-training little boy in their latest commercial. And just in time to start your Christmas shopping!

“Moschino Barbie is so fierce!” the boy screams as he and two female friends laud the doll, done up in designer Jeremy Scott’s sleek glamour. Barbie’s cellphone goes off and the little boy says, “It’s for you, Moschino Barbie,” before winking at the camera. Watch the ad below, and see for yourself:


You will notice that, in the commercial, Mattel was not content with merely casting a boy in a girl’s Barbie doll commercial. No, they cast a little boy in a girl’s Barbie doll commercial and made him lisp and preen like a homosexual fashion queen. Mattel is not selling you a doll, they are selling your children the LGBT agenda, that’s what this commercial exists to do.
Little boys all across America will see this commercial, and then copy it’s mannerisms. That’s what kids do with television.

If this world lasts for another 20 years, the next generation is going to be a freak show of transexual, asexual, multi-sexual lost and confused human beings that will have more in common with Sodom and Gomorrah than they will with the America you and I were raised in.

Every world empire that has ever existed in the annals of world history came to their crashing end when, as a nation, they embraced a culture of open sodomy. The Greeks, the Romans, all of them came to a bitter end. America will fare no better.

As the commercial says, “Moschino Barbie is fierce”, but not nearly as fierce as the spirit of wickedness and depravity that’s behind her.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on December 18, 2015, 03:31:54 pm
STD infections rise to record levels among U.S. citizens thanks to the liberal 'sexual revolution' and hook-up apps

Saturday, November 28, 2015 by: L.J. Devon, Staff Writer

(NaturalNews) A single, misguided ideology, embedded in one's heart and mind, can set their life on a course toward emotional discord, empty pursuits of temporary satisfaction, brokenness and utter shame. People are writing the code of their life with their thoughts and emotions, drawing near to their heart's desires. A mindset where "everything goes" where there is no moral standard in intimate relationships, can set a person on a destructive course of hollow relationships, broken promises, mistrust and even greater incidence of sexually transmitted disease.

What kind of sail do you set for yourself in your relationships? What are your views on self-control, family, patience, love, marriage and commitment? Your beliefs have a profound effect on the situations and outcomes you will experience. Many people sell themselves short, ditching the soulfully fulfilling aspects of intimate love for a quick hook-up that promises immediate satisfaction.

Feelings may come and go, beckoning a sexual interaction, but how important might it be to lead our hearts with integrity instead of following whatever fleeting feelings we may have? The attractions we have with others don't have to propel us to our animalistic instincts. We are beings of self-control. These attractions can endow us with the opportunity of friendship, teaching us wonderful life lessons as we go along. In the end, our intimacy and sexual energy can be saved for the love that is promising, committed. Love is patient. It's not a temporary sensation, nor some kind of sexual satisfaction reaped in the moment. Love endures. It is not filled with envy and lust. Love is long lasting.

The sacred parts of love get left behind in today's liberal culture, where "everything goes," where instant gratification trumps soulfully-fulfilling intimacy.

It's easy to observe: that the free love "sexual revolution" ideology of liberal culture destroys what love really stands for, making for abrupt, aimless relationships that fuel distrust and perpetual heartbreak, while welcoming greater incidence of sexually transmitted diseases.

STD rates climbing in America

The Centers for Disease Control reports that cases of chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis are at an all time high, with reported cases rising for all STDs in 2014. There are now 1.4 million reported cases of chlamydia in the US, which is equivalent to 456 cases for every 100,000 people.

The CDC stats list gonorrhea cases up 5 percent from 2013, a total of 350,062 reported cases in the US. For contagious forms of syphilis, the rate has jumped dramatically, up 15 percent from the previous year – now totaling over 20,000 cases. The government has reported that increases in rates of syphilis primarily occur in men's homosexual and bisexual communities.

Most gonorrhea and chlamydia infections were reported by 15- to 24-year-olds, an ongoing trend that shows how uneducated young people are in the realm of love, sex and relationships.

The CDC's Dr. Jonathan Mermin commented, "America's worsening STD epidemic is a clear call for better diagnosis, treatment, and prevention."

Prevention of STDs: Now, that's an important topic to consider. True prevention of STDs would mean teaching young people about the commitment of loving relationships and setting new principles in intimacy. This is where the liberal mindset of "everyone's going to do it; everyone should get free condoms" misleads many young people in both heart and mind.

This deception can be replaced by teaching a healthier perspective on what building long-lasting, committed relationships really means, how self-control demonstrates real character, and why it is important for sexual energy to be regarded as sacred for a more holy, fulfilling and lifelong union.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on January 21, 2016, 05:12:23 pm
New BJS study finds high rates of campus sexual assault

The Bureau of Justice Statistics released a new study Wednesday that offers some insight on the prevalence of sexual assaults on college campuses.

During the 2014 to 2015 school year alone, the study found that 10.3 percent of female undergraduates had been the victim of a sexual assault, which they defined as **** or sexual violence. The BJS surveyed 23,000 students from nine different universities for the comprehensive report — 15,000 female and 8,000 male.

The findings also showed that across the nine schools, rates of sexual assault were “significantly higher among nonheterosexual than heterosexual female students.”

In a statement provided to Yahoo News, Scott Berkowitz, president and founder of the ****, Abuse and Incest National Network or RAINN, called the findings “alarming,” and pointed out the “huge variation in rates of sexual violence” between schools.

“The rate at the worst school was nearly five times higher than at the best,” Berkowitz noted. “This demonstrates that **** isn’t a normal part of the college experience, but rather a horror that can be prevented with strong action from campus leadership and by holding more perpetrators accountable.”

Berkowitz also said the study’s results “show the importance of Congress passing the Campus Accountability and Safety Act, which will ensure that every campus implements a consistent annual survey.”

The mandatory sex assault survey is just one aspect of the legislation, which aims to improve the process for investigating sexual assaults on campus. Nearly two years after it was first introduced by a bipartisan coalition of senators including Democrats Claire McCaskill and Kirsten Gillibrand and Republicans Mark Warner and Marco Rubio, the bill known as CASA is still pending in Congress.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on February 01, 2016, 05:12:08 pm

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on February 01, 2016, 05:40:47 pm
Catholic Seminarian Arrested for Seeking Sexual Relations With Infants, Toddlers

A former priest-in-training has been arrested for allegedly seeking to have sexual relations with infants and toddlers in Mexico following an undercover investigation.

Joel Wright, 23, of Columbus, Ohio was arrested on Saturday and is expected to be arraigned in federal court today. He has been charged with traveling with the intent to engage in a sexual act with a minor and attempting to engage in illicit sexual conduct in a foreign country.

According to a complaint from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of California, Wright was the subject of an undercover investigation that began in November. Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) had received a tip from a person in Mexico relating to an advertisement on Craigslist surrounding the adoption of infants.

Wright had initially stated that he was seeking to meet a woman to marry and adopt a child, but the conversation shifted to his desire to engage in sexual conduct with children.

An undercover agent posing as a Mexican tour guide conversed with Wright via email after the tip was reported, and was allegedly told by Wright that he wanted to adopt a child under three years old and have sexual relations with the toddler or infant, but requested that the information not be disclosed.

When asked if he had engaged in such conduct before, he replied, “I have not gone all the way before, but I have made it very close in the past, so I do have experience.” Other discussions between the two were too graphic to be posted.

Wright soon booked a flight to San Diego where he planned to meet with the friend of a tour guide, which was to take him into Mexico to meet female infants at a Tijuana hotel. He had asked that he be referred to as “Francis” and not his real name. When Wright’s plane landed at San Diego’s Lindberg Field, he was arrested by HSI agents.

“This investigation opens a window into a secret world were sexual predators prey on young children around the globe,” said Dave Shaw, special agent in charge for HSI San Diego, said in a statement. “Pedophiles who mistakenly believe they can escape justice by committing child sex crimes outside the U.S. should be on notice that HSI will seek to vindicate the rights of those victims regardless where they live.”

“Fortunately, in this instance, our perseverance and diligence prevented the sexual exploitation of yet another innocent victim,” he stated.

Wright was a student at at Pontifical College Josephinum in Columbus, Ohio, which he began attending last fall after undergoing a series of psychological tests and interviews, as well as a background check. According to the Associated Press, he lost his status at the Catholic seminary for leaving campus without first obtaining authorization.

“We’re shocked and saddened by the heinous nature of the allegations,” said John Allen, vice president for advancement at Pontifical College Josephinum.

According to the institution’s website, the school “was established more than 125 years ago to help prepare men for the priesthood.”

HSI says that it has arrested more than 12,000 people for sexually related crimes involving minors since its inception in 2003.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on March 16, 2016, 04:04:42 am
Ex-Subway pitchman Fogle gets more than 15 years in prison

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — The latest on the sentencing of former Subway spokesman Jared Fogle for sex crimes (all times local):

1 p.m.

A judge has sentenced former Subway pitchman Jared Fogle to 15 years and eight months in prison for trading in child pornography and having sex with underage prostitutes.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt sentenced Fogle on Thursday after he pleaded guilty to one count each of travelling to engage in illicit sexual conduct with a minor and distribution and receipt of child pornography.

Fogle agreed to the plea deal in August after authorities raided his suburban Indianapolis home in July.

Prosecutors sought a 12˝-year sentence, while Fogle's attorneys sought five years.

The 38-year-old Fogle admitted paying for sex with girls as young as 16 and receiving child pornography produced by his charitable foundation's former director.

He also agreed pay his 14 victims $100,000 each in restitution.

Jared Fogle Beaten and Bloodied in Prison Yard Ambush

Jared Fogle got a surprise beatdown in federal prison from an inmate who has major issues with child molesters ... TMZ has learned.

According to docs, Fogle got jumped in the rec yard at Englewood prison in Colorado back on January 29, and it was not much of a fight. An inmate named Steven Nigg pushed Fogle down and then unloaded a barrage of punches to his face.

Nigg, who's in for a weapons charge, left Fogle with a bloody nose, swollen face and scratches on his neck. 60-year-old Nigg was also injured -- a small cut on his left hand from delivering the whuppin'. Prison officials put Nigg in solitary as punishment. 

We spoke to Nigg's family and they're not surprised. We're told Steven's pissed because so many child sex predators are housed in the low security facility, and Fogle was just the last straw.

Jared's attorney had no comment.

We don't wanna say karma, but ... oops.

Read more: http://www.tmz.com/#ixzz433TRR6Dl

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on March 20, 2016, 01:21:54 pm

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: FervorForFaith on March 26, 2016, 10:27:19 pm
Just watched a very interesting video on "Comprehensive Sexual Education." It goes into what they teach, where it's taught, etc. Very interesting. They blur out the graphic images, which is nice, but unfortunately for children they get to see the images in their entirety. It even goes a little bit into the origins of this kind of "education" with Kinsey and his "research."

https://vimeo.com/152728936 (https://vimeo.com/152728936)

At the end it gets a little ecumenical with trying to show how you can help fight CSE, but otherwise a very good short film.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on April 01, 2016, 08:16:44 pm
Satanic book, Bible sex tracts provided in Colorado schools

DENVER (AP) — It sounds like an April Fool's joke, but it's not.
Atheists provided pamphlets on topics like sex in the Bible, problems with the Ten Commandments and a Satanic activity book to middle and high school students in a rural Colorado district Friday, the result of a fight between Delta County schools and critics over whether it should continue to let everyone from Little League organizers to the Gideons distribute literature in schools.
The Freedom from Religion Foundation is behind the literature. The Madison, Wisconsin-based group got involved after a mother sought help in December from the Western Colorado Atheists and Freethinkers, which contacted the foundation.

The woman was upset about Bibles made available in schools on tables designated for pamphlet and book giveaways, and there were also complaints that students who didn't take them were bullied, said Anne Landman, founder of Western Colorado Atheists and Freethinkers.

The Freedom from Religion Foundation successfully sued over a similar distribution policy in Orlando, Florida schools. In an effort to also change policy in the Delta County district, the foundation asked for permission to offer the pamphlets, which it calls "non-tracts", as well as the activity book on the same tables. Despite the name of the activity book, the Satanic theme is limited to symbols in drawings. The book, which includes word jumbles and other games, teaches kindness and "the basic morals that we all agree on", foundation co-president Annie Laurie Gaylor said.

In a letter to district superintendent Caryn Gibson, foundation lawyer Andrew Seidel said the group would rather the district just change its policy and stop all groups from distributing literature in schools.

District spokesman Kurt Clay said the policy is not aimed at helping religious proselytizing but allowing the easy distribution of information about outside groups like Little League and the Boy Scouts in small towns where there are no recreation centers and most extracurricular activities are run by volunteers. He said officials are considering changing the policy but that will take some time.

"We're trying to get the proper material out to kids," he said.

Clay said the school district did not want to risk a costly lawsuit but also decided that students would not be hurt by the giveaway and might also learn about different views on religion.

He said allowing the material to be made available on April 1 was just a coincidence. It follows a string of standardized testing days and is the last day before spring break.

Clay said only enough material for about a tenth of students was provided. By midday, some materials were completely gone while tables in other schools still had some remaining, he said.

Landman said allowing Bibles into schools is just one way the district has made it difficult for its non-Christian minority. Her group also complained about a Bible study with a teacher who offered free doughnuts to students who showed up for the gathering before school. The Daily Sentinel reported that the district recently discontinued the group but the gathering has been revived by students instead.

For now, she said that literature distribution is shining a "white hot spotlight" on the district.

"It's gotten people thinking," she said.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on April 20, 2016, 10:26:02 pm
School Asks 4-Year-Olds to Pick their Gender
"Not all children and young people identify with the gender they were assigned at birth."

A  city council in England sent out a letter to parents asking them to support their child's choice of "gender identity" before starting school. Some of the children who will be choosing their gender identity are as young as 4 years old.

    It wrote to parents urging them to support their child’s choice of “gender identity” in a letter confirming primary school places this week.

    And it asked them to leave the gender section of a form blank if their child had “another gender identity” altogether. The letter was sent to thousands of parents preparing to send kids to new schools later this year.

Brighton and Hove City Council wrote: “We recognise that not all children and young people identify with the gender they were assigned at birth or may identify as a gender other than male or female, however the current systems (set nationally) only record gender as male or female.

“Please support your child to choose the gender they most identify with. Or if they have another gender identity please leave this blank and discuss with your child’s school.”

 Tory MP Andrew Bridgen said the letter was “utterly ridiculous.” He added, “Schools should be teaching kids to read and write, not prompting them to consider gender swaps.”

The school sent out the letter just months after it sent students a gender survey with 25 options to select from. Some of the possibilities were “genderqueer,” “tri-gender,” and “gender fluid.”

Emma Daniel, head of Brighton’s equalities committee addressed the concerns of outraged parents by saying, “We will review this to see whether we can make it clearer that we consider discussions around gender identity to be an option for parents rather than an obligation.”


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on April 25, 2016, 09:23:35 pm


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on May 18, 2016, 01:57:49 pm
Salon Pushes **** Sympathy...Again
"I'm a ****, not a monster" same thing moron

Leftists over at Salon have skipped bestiality as their next conquest of sexual liberation and have moved straight on to pedophilia instead.

It all began in September last year with the article "I'm a ****, but not a monster," which featured self-identified **** Todd Nickerson of the website "Virtuous Pedophiles" classify his sexual disorder as a "sexual identity" that needs to be met with some kind of compassion. Though neither Nickerson nor Salon advocates that pedophiles should be allowed to act on their urges, they do feel they should be allowed to be open about their identities without facing repercussions or be ostracized, as if people would be wrong to shield their children from ever being in their presence.

In a new video released Tuesday, Salon featured Nickerson talking openly about the nature of his sexual disorder, which he classifies as an orientation, and how he manages to resist the urge to molest children.

According to Nickerson, at age 18, he babysat a five-year old girl and fell in love with her, and since he never wanted to act on his urges, he chose to privately "relieve" himself instead. Thankfully, he has never molested a child his whole life and doesn't wish to. Instead, Nickerson wants to foster a new attitude in society that allows pedophiles to openly identify as such so they won't be forced underground.

So, essentially, as is always true of the left, Nickerson and Salon have begun to argue that if someone molests a child, then it's society's fault for not accepting him. They want us to own pedophilia, rather than kick it to the shadows. Nickerson even says society has "persecuted" men such as himself. 

To make one thing clear, if someone has sexual fantasies about children and resists the urge to act, then that person needs to get help until those desires are eliminated or seriously diminished, and we should encourage that as long as they do. Many people who experience pedophilia were themselves victims of sexual abuse, and it is perfectly appropriate to hope for the healing of such a person.

Salon has moved way beyond that, however, by demanding we accept such a person as they are so long as they never molest a child. They want us to see that as part of who they are and not a grotesque disorder. There is no owning pedophilia, the same way there is no owning STD's as feminists do. Pedophiles have thoughts that need to go away, not merely be kept at bay.

In the comment boxes on Salon, some leftists have even gone so far as to suggest that pedophiles like Nickerson should be allowed to engage in simulated child pornography so they can stimulate themselves, theoretically preventing them from molesting actual children. The same "own it" mentality goes into the left's solution for every social ill: the war on drugs has failed, so let everyone have drugs; transgenders have a high rate of suicide, so let's celebrate transgenderism; get an STD or have an abortion, take pride in it; aroused by kids, indulge in simulated child ****.

The goal posts just keep moving. 


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on May 24, 2016, 01:03:11 am
Obama’s gender ‘identity’ rules go beyond bathrooms, showers

President Obama’s edict requiring all public schools to open girls’ bathrooms, showers and other facilities to males who self-identify as female will lead to sexual chaos and confusion among children, critics predict.

Few media outlets are reporting the extent of the policy as described in the president’s new “guidelines” but once people find out there is likely to be backlash, says the author of a book critical of the theories of the late sexologist Alfred Kinsey and the Kinsey Institute, which have largely been adopted by public school sex-ed classes taught since the 1970s.

Dr. Judith Reisman, author of “Sexual Sabotage,” says the transgender agenda being pushed by the Obama administration is all coming down from the Kinsey Institute and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, or UNESCO.

As early as 2009, UNESCO was promoting Kinsey-supported teachings on child sexual development, offering a curriculum that encouraged parents to be supportive and open-minded to gender identity and sexual orientation. The curriculum discouraged parents from enforcing traditional gender identities, stating: “Confusion about these issues and fear of homosexuality (homophobia) has caused many parents and other adults to limit how girls and boys express themselves.”

Who is ‘transgender?’

Under Obama’s new rules, a male student does not have to be undergoing hormone treatment or surgeries to be considered “transgender.” Any boy can qualify by merely walking into the principal’s office at his school and declaring himself a girl.

What’s more, a student’s gender “identity” is considered “fluid,” so he could consider himself a boy one day and a girl the next. The burden is on the school to adapt and accommodate.

The fact that the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division signed the new guidelines along with the U.S. Department of Education sends a message to schools. Comply or be sued. The guidelines are riddled with words like “must” and “obligations” to fulfill federal Title IX requirements.

Title IX is a federal law passed by Congress and signed into law in 1972 by President Richard Nixon. It was meant to prevent discrimination against girls in any educational programs offered by schools that receive federal funding. But the law is now being rewritten by Obama to include a new class of protected individuals whose gender is “fluid” and changeable by the day or even the hour.

So far, eight states have vowed to ignore Obama’s guidelines. The governors of Texas, North Carolina, Mississippi, Kentucky, Arkansas, Alabama and Louisiana have urged schools to reject the order on the basis that it endangers pupils.

But the language is clear that the term “transgender” is defined as fluid and subject to change at any given moment.

The guidelines state:

    “The Departments interpret Title IX to require that when a student or the student’s parent or guardian, as appropriate, notifies the school administration that the student will assert a gender identity that differs from previous representations or records, the school will begin treating the student consistent with the student’s gender identity. Under Title IX, there is no medical diagnosis or treatment requirement that students must meet as a prerequisite to being treated consistent with their gender identity.”

This means that if a boy “identifies” as a girl, he must be treated as though he were a girl in all instances, even if he has no legal documents to prove he is a girl.

WND sent phone and email messages to the U.S. Department of Education Monday seeking clarification on whether a boy could walk into school in the morning and tell his principal he is a girl, then change back to a boy at lunch hour and become a girl during afternoon gym class. Media specialist David Thomas did not immediately respond to the question.

But the letter from the two federal agencies goes to great lengths to answer that question with the following statement:

    “Because transgender students often are unable to obtain identification documents that reflect their gender identity (e.g., due to restrictions imposed by state or local law in their place of birth or residence), requiring students to produce such identification documents in order to treat them consistent with their gender identity may violate Title IX when doing so has the practical effect of limiting or denying students equal access to an educational program or activity. A school’s Title IX obligation to ensure nondiscrimination on the basis of sex requires schools to provide transgender students equal access to educational programs and activities even in circumstances in which other students, parents, or community members raise objections or concerns.

    “As is consistently recognized in civil rights cases, the desire to accommodate others’ discomfort cannot justify a policy that singles out and disadvantages a particular class of students.”

‘They aim to wipe out all morality’

Reisman, a professor of law at Liberty University and author of the book “Sexual Sabotage,” said there is no end to the chaos the left has in store for American youth. She predicted more than 17 years ago that boys and girls would be taught to question their gender identity in U.S. public schools.

In her 1998 book, “Crimes and Consequences,” she wrote that schools were teaching children that they may be homosexual and they are just as likely to be bisexual. She said teachers and students nationwide were beginning to organize “Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgendered youth groups in schools nationwide.”

Many critics of her book said she was overreacting. Now she stands vindicated.

“They aim to wipe out all morality – whatever legal mechanisms that have protected the weak from the strong for thousands of years, to allow hypersexualizing all, expecting still normal folks to ‘get over it,'” Reisman told WND. “It will be all ages for sex and include no limitations. There are to be no boundaries or regulations with regard to sexual identity or behavior. Indoctrination of all, at least by kindergarten, that one’s sexuality is a fluid, changing construct.

“Young minds will be exploited, fearful, confused, leading to the inability to think critically, becoming beholden to the elite class (state) for knowledge and provision,” she added.

Right now the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) for 2014 identify “SCHOOL—ELEMENTARY/SECONDARY” as the third-most sexually dangerous/injurious environment for children.

She said Obama’s new “guidelines” for complying with Title IX will extend to college roommates, meaning a freshmen student entering university could get assigned to a dorm room with a transgender student of the same biological sex and would not be notified in advance of the situation.

Overnight sleeping arrangements for field trips and out-of-town sporting events will also be impacted.

“The administration is directing that for all intents and purposes, individuals are to be treated as the sex with which they identify regardless of biology, regardless of science, regardless of birth sex,” Reisman said. “If a man says he identifies as a woman he is to be treated as a women for housing, showers, bathrooms, sports participation.”

WND also asked the Department of Education spokesman if a boy would be able to participate on the girls shot-put team if he felt that he identified as a girl. No response was immediately given.

“If a boy identifies as a girl, he is to be permitted to room with girls on sports and extracurricular outings,” Reisman added. “This is an absolute end to equal rights for women.”

The Arcadia Unified School District case in California involved a middle-school girl who self-identified as a boy and was not allowed to room in a cabin with other boys during an overnight field trip. The school district required the girl/boy to spend the night in a separate cabin with her/his father. After a complaint was filed on the child’s behalf by the National Center for Lesbian Rights, the civil rights divisions of the U.S. Departments of Justice and Education agreed in 2013 this policy was discriminatory and a violation Title IX requirements. The school district was forced to rewrite its policy.

Where will this all end?

“It is hard to see an ending other than complete anarchy in terms of trying to educate children and young adults,” Reisman said.

And it’s already happening.

The NIBRS statistics reported that sex offenders 10 and under numbered 1,992 nationwide in 2014, while in the 11-15 age bracket there were 8,534 offenders and their victims 10 and under numbered 18,446 and 21,768, respectively. Children raping children.

“What we’re seeing is effective school sex education to train up child molesters,” Reisman said.

What’s next on left’s sexual agenda?

Next on the agenda of the far left is legalizing pedophilia, she predicts.

“In other words, to legalize sex between adults and children. This is already going on in the media, particularly in Salon.com, that has posted a couple of articles about pedophiles not being ‘monsters.’ There has been a longstanding effort on the part of pedophiles to normalize their deviancy – even renaming themselves ‘minor-attracted persons,'” Reisman said.

“They have been lobbying the American Psychological Association to change definitions,” she said. This effort has been spearheaded by Dr. Fred Berlin of Johns Hopkins University Medical School.

See Fox News interview with Judith Reisman on this topic below:

It was also reported Monday that Obama is threatening hospitals with the loss of federal funding if they refuse to provide sex-change operations. The new rule to the Affordable Care Act showed up last week on the Department of Health and Human Services website.

The final rule states that, under Title IX, any hospital receiving funding from HHS must “treat individuals consistent with their gender identity.” The rule provides no religious exemption.

Outrages against sanity’
Pastor, author, radio host Carl Gallups

Pastor, author, radio host Carl Gallups

“The outrages against sanity and sanctity will continue unchecked until rational, lucid, morally convicted people of power step forward and say, “Stop the insanity – now!” Until that moment comes, unabated evil will insist on overwhelming its victims,” says Carl Gallups, a radio host, author and Baptist minister in Florida.

“In the meantime, how will Obama and his federal sycophants reconcile the fact that a bevy of legal, scientific and medical professionals call the ludicrous and radical transgender ‘agenda’ a mental illness and a moral outrage?” said Gallups, author of “Be Thou Prepared” and “Final Warning,” both of which deal with matters of end-times biblical perspectives and the challenges faced by Christians.

Others such as Dr. Robert P. George, the McCormick professor of jurisprudence at Princeton University, have publicly questioned the science behind the transgender movement. George insists that the notion that a woman can be trapped inside a man’s body is ludicrous and superstitious, with no basis in medical fact.

The American College of Pediatricians also issued a recent statement that it “urges educators and legislators to reject all policies that condition children to accept as normal a life of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex. Facts – not ideology – determine reality. A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking. When an otherwise healthy biological boy believes he is a girl, or an otherwise healthy biological girl believes she is a boy, an objective psychological problem exists that lies in the mind not the body, and it should be treated as such.”

Gallups says suicide is also a major problem among transgenders.

“I am deeply concerned with the facts of a recent UCLA survey which indicated that a full 41 percent of trans or gender non-conforming people surveyed have attempted suicide,” he said.

“These statistics line up with Dr. Paul McHugh, former psychiatrist in chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital, and his piece in the Wall Street Journal stating that, ‘This intensely felt sense of being transgendered constitutes a mental disorder.’ After studying the effects of transgender surgery for over 10 years, Dr. McHugh says the results showed that the transgender ‘suicide mortality rose almost 20-fold above the comparable nontransgender population.’

“So, how can the federal government, and a morally bankrupt and runaway administration, legislate upon the entire population and its children what legal, scientific and medical professionals are calling a mental disorder?” Gallups says. “The answer is that they cannot legally do so – not without severe consequences.”


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 24, 2016, 01:21:00 am
They've been pushing this even further back - that rock music guy who died recently (Prince) was very popular during my time as a young boy in the 80's. And there were other rock music people who played the roles of transgenders as well (ie, Boy George).

As you can see, the wars on our minds by spiritual wickedness in high places are SLOW AND GRADUAL conditioning.

Pretty much, Obama all but put the final nail in the coffin.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on May 24, 2016, 02:29:25 am

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on May 24, 2016, 09:32:54 am
They're already pushing this in the mainstream already?? No, I can't say I'm surprised - but nonetheless looks like, and sadly, they're doing so without shots being fired.

Sodomite marriage - dragged out for YEARS very bloodily

The transgender bathroom wars - a few wars, but significantly fewer shots being fired

Looks like the worse perversions will get pushed through without many knowing them, sadly.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on June 01, 2016, 02:42:23 pm
Video: https://www.yahoo.com/news/police-teacher-pregnant-13-old-153440544.html
Police: Teacher pregnant with 13-year-old student's child

Arrest warrant issued for Texas middle school teacher Alexandria Vera

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 03, 2016, 10:03:09 pm
Plano Senior High athlete accused of sexually assaulting children he knew through mom's day care

A Plano Senior High School baseball player is accused of sexually assaulting two children he knew through a home day care run by his mother, police say.

Zachary Holifield, 17,  was arrested June 20 and remains in the Collin County Jail on $600,000 bail.

Jail records show he is charged with two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child and one count of indecency with a child by sexual contact.

David Tilley, a Plano police spokesman, said the charges relate to two children Holifield knew through the day care his mother operated out of her home.

Holifield, a rising senior at Plano Senior High, verbally committed to Oklahoma State University's baseball program in April, the recruiting website FieldLevel reported.

In a story by the Plano Star Courier last month, the teen was described as a top pitcher for the Wildcats.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 20, 2016, 08:21:02 am
Garry Marshall, ‘Pretty Woman’ Director and Creator of ‘Happy Days,’ Dies at 81

Garry Marshall, who created some of the 1970s’ most iconic sitcoms including “Happy Days,” “The Odd Couple,” “Laverne and Shirley” and “Mork and Mindy” and went on to direct hit movies including “Pretty Woman” and “The Princess Diaries,” died Tuesday. He was 81. The news was first reported by Access Hollywood.

Marshall’s first bigscreen blockbuster was 1990’s “Pretty Woman,” starring Julia Roberts as a highly idealized **** and Richard Gere as her client-cum-Prince Charming. The romantic comedy grossed $463 million worldwide. Roberts was Oscar nominated for best actress, the film was nominated for a Golden Globe for best comedy/musical — and Marshall scored a Cesar nomination as “Pretty Woman” drew a mention in the French awards’ foreign-film category.

In 1970 Marshall had a substantial hit when he developed and exec produced an adaptation of Neil Simon’s play “The Odd Couple” for ABC. The show drew several Emmy nominations for outstanding comedy series and wins for stars Jack Klugman and Tony Randall over the course of its five-season run. (In 2015 Marshall served as a consultant on a CBS remake of the series that starred Matthew Perry and Thomas Lennon.)

Marshall penned the 1971 pilot for “Happy Days,” which was recycled in 1972 as a segment of ABC’s comedy anthology series “Love, American Style” called “Love and the Happy Days.” George Lucas asked to view the pilot before deciding to cast Ron Howard, who starred in it, in “American Graffiti,” released in 1973.

“Happy Days” debuted as a series on the network in 1974, riding high on the wave of 1950s nostalgia generated in part by the success of “American Graffiti.”

During its peak, “Happy Days” was the No. 1 show on television during the 1976-77 season, No. 2 in 1977-78 and No. 4 the following year, and Henry Winkler’s the Fonz became a cultural touchstone, with his leather jacket eventually landing in the Smithsonian. Years later Marshall acknowledged being the one behind the idea, for a 1977 episode, of putting Fonzie on water skis — an idea so outlandish that it spawned the phrase “jumped the shark,” said in reference to a show that is clearly past its prime.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 26, 2016, 10:56:33 am

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 29, 2016, 05:33:46 pm
46-year-old pastor gets 10-year-old girl pregnant, police say

Raymond Vincent appears in front of Broward County judge

By Andrea Torres - Digital Reporter/Producer , Derek Shore - Reporter

Posted: 10:09 PM, July 01, 2016

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. - When a 10-year-old girl ended up in the hospital with stomach pain, doctors learned she was pregnant.

Fort Lauderdale police detectives from the special victims unit met the girl at Broward Health Medical Center earlier this year.

The man accused of getting the pregnant, police said, was Raymond Vincent, a youth pastor who used to live in Fort Lauderdale.

U.S. marshals tracked Vincent, 46, to Haiti. They flew him from Port-au-Prince and turned him over to the Fort Lauderdale Police Department. A Broward County judge denied his bond in court Saturday morning.

Vincent had been accused of molesting a child in 2011. Police said he offered a girl food to lure her into his apartment. The girl said he molested her several times.

On Friday, Vincent faced one count of sexual battery on a child and one count of lewd and lascivious conduct. But authorities believe he could have abused other children during his time as a youth pastor in South Florida.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 11, 2016, 06:35:42 am
Disgraced Former US Rep. Mark Foley Spotted at Trump Rally

Former U.S. Rep. Mark Foley, who resigned from Congress in 2006 in disgrace after sending sexually explicit messages to teenage congressional pages, attended a rally for Donald Trump in Fort Lauderdale, Florida on Wednesday.

Foley, who could be seen in the background in videos and photos of the event, raised his hand when Trump asked if the people featured in the seats directly behind the stage knew him.

"[H]ow many of you people know me?" Trump asked, adding, "A lot of you people know me. When you get those seats, you sort of know the campaign."

A longtime Republican presidential campaign advance staffer described the seating area behind the candidate to ABC News as a "tapestry" -- a backdrop of people often chosen by the campaign to reflect wide-ranging support for the candidate.

Foley's appearance comes as Trump continues to bash Hillary Clinton after Seddique Mateen -- the father of Orlando shooter Omar Mateen -- attended her rally in Kissimmee, Florida on Monday.

The Clinton campaign said that they had no prior knowledge of Sedique Mateen's presence at the rally, calling it an "open-door event for the public," and later added the Clinton "disavows his support."

[T]he people behind me, they’re all on television," Trump told the crowd at BB&T Center. "They're gonna be famous. And by the way, speaking of that, wasn’t it terrible when the father of the animal that killed the wonderful people in Orlando was sitting with a big smile on his face right behind Hillary Clinton?"

Following the Trump gathering, Foley confirmed to MSNBC his support of Trump's presidential bid, and said that the two have a longstanding relationship. "[H]e’s been a friend of mine for 30 years and one of my biggest contributors," Foley said.

According to campaign contribution records compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, Trump gave at least $9,500 to Foley's political campaigns over a period of 10 years.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 12, 2016, 03:30:29 pm
Judge to woman in **** case: 'Why couldn't you just keep your knees together?'

CNN)A judge in Canada is facing removal from the bench for his conduct when he asked a woman in a **** case why she couldn't "just keep [her] knees together."

Federal Court Judge Robin Camp is in the midst of a week-long judicial council hearing, which will determine whether he ought to be booted from his position.

The case in question took place in 2014 when Camp was a provincial court judge. (He became a Federal Judge last year.)

The 19-year-old woman said she was raped over a bathroom sink during a house party.

According to records of the trial, Camp asked her why she didn't "skew her pelvis" or push her bottom into the sink to avoid penetration. He openly wondered, "Why couldn't you just keep your knees together?"

On the subject of sex in general, and sex with young women in particular, he said, "Young wom[e]n want to have sex, particularly if they're drunk."
In a different part of the trial, he said "Some sex and pain sometimes go together...that's not necessarily a bad thing."

Camp, 64, ultimately acquitted the man charged with the crime, and then told him:

"I want you to tell your friends, your male friends, that they have to be far more gentle with women. They have to be far more patient. And they have to be very careful. To protect themselves, they have to be very careful."

The verdict was overturned on appeal. A new trial is scheduled for November.

'Minimal' knowledge of Canadian law
These and other moments from the trial led the Canadian Judicial Council to open its investigation.

Camp, the council said, "engaged in stereotypical or biased thinking in relation to a sexual assault complainant."

Testifying at the hearing Friday, Camp offered this defense for his comments: "a non-existent" knowledge of Canadian criminal law.

The South African-born judge said he didn't receive training on sex assault cases. In his legal career, he focused mostly on contract and bankruptcy cases, he said.

"My colleagues knew my knowledge of Canadian law was very minimal. It was non-existent," he said at the hearing Friday. "Please remember I wasn't in this country through the 1960s, '70s and '80s."

He also apologized to the woman for his comments, calling them "rude and insulting."

The scrutiny he's already faced
It hasn't taken a full two years for people to notice Camp's off-color comments. According to a Notice of Response from the judicial council, Camp has undergone sensitivity training and has apologized publicly several times.

"[Camp] has undergone counseling and training with [a] Superior Court Justice...with a psychologist... and with an expert on the law of sexual assault...with a view to interrogating his beliefs and improving his understanding of the law, the social context of sexual violence and the psychological impact of sexual assault," the notice reads.

After the hearing Monday, the panel will send its recommendation about Camp's future to the full Canadian Judicial Council.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 11, 2016, 05:04:17 pm
Ben Carson on Donald Trump tapes: 'I've heard people talking like that'

(CNN)Ben Carson said Tuesday "of course" he's heard similar language from other people along the lines of the recently surfaced lewd and sexually aggressive comments from Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump.

"I've heard people talking like that. Of course. Are you kidding me?" the former Republican presidential candidate told CNN's Brianna Keilar. "As I was growing up, people were always trying to talk about their sexual conquests and trying to make themselves appear like Casanova."

Carson, who supports Trump, said that at the time they were recorded -- nearly 11 years ago -- the Republican presidential candidate was a "billionaire playboy," adding that he had personally heard people speaking in a similar manner about women in the past.

When Keilar said she had never heard such lewd comments made, Carson said: "Maybe that's the problem."

"Whether they've heard it or not, the issue is the train that's going off the cliff. We can come back after we save the country, after we save the country from going off the cliff," he said.

Carson said that conversation surrounding the leaked audio -- and accompanying media coverage -- were detracting voters from more pressing concerns, such as college debt and rising taxes.

Trump campaign co-chair: Trump made lewd comments before recent faith journey
With under a month remaining until Election Day, Carson said Trump must concentrate on leavening key issues and platforms, instead of responding to statements he made more than a decade ago.

"It's probably not what I would be concentrating on right now," Carson said. "The place where Donald Trump is going to win is on the issues. Why not concentrate on what two out of three Americans are concerned about? That's the direction of the country. That's one he can win easily."

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 14, 2016, 12:50:03 pm
Trump Jr.: Women Who 'Can't Handle' Harassment Should Teach Kindergarten

In a 2013 radio interview on the "The Opie and Anthony Show" surfaced by Buzzfeed News on Thursday, Donald Trump Jr. complains about women making charges of sexual harassment in the workplace, suggesting that women who have a trouble with men making certain comments should go teach kindergarten.

The comments came as Trump Jr. and the hosts were discussing whether women should be allowed at male-only golf courses.

“If you have a guys’ place you have a guys’ place," Trump Jr. said.

One of the hosts then lamented that women "complain" about "harassment."

"That’s why we hate having them around. They stop us from doing what we want to do," the host said.

Trump Jr. said that "in the club house, guys just want to be guys" and converse freely "even if you’re just talking s**t and it’s not really true."

One of the hosts then said that it's mostly "just bulls**tting around" and then suddenly human resources is intervening.

Trump Jr. then said, "I’m of that mindset — and I’ll get into trouble, I’m sure — I’ve been on this show enough, I’m sure I’ll get myself in trouble one of these days — but like, if you can’t handle some of the basic stuff that’s become a problem in the workforce today, like you don’t belong in the workforce. Like, you should go maybe teach kindergarten. I think it’s a respectable position."

"You can’t be negotiating billion-dollar deals if you can’t handle, like, you know...” Trump Jr. continued. “But listen — there’s a place where you have to draw the line — but today the stuff you get in trouble for…”

Listen to the clip at Buzzfeed News.

This article was written by Caitlin MacNeal from Talking Points Memo and was legally licensed through the NewsCred publisher network.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 25, 2016, 12:48:27 pm

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on November 16, 2016, 11:26:56 pm
Gendersaurus Rex: Government Targets Preschoolers With Lessons on 'Sexuality, Queerness and Difference'

Scottish kids are being encouraged to explore "queerness" and question whether they are a boy or a girl, in a project paid for by taxpayers.

"Gendersaurus Rex" is an "artistic research project" exploring how "gender, feminism, sexuality, queerness and difference" can be incorporated into live performance for children.

It was commissioned by Imaginate, a performing arts group that is subsidized by the Scottish government and the European Union.

According to its website, Imaginate "works in partnership with schools, local authorities and Education Scotland to support pupils, teachers and other educators' creative development."

The project is being led by controversial performance artist Eilidh MacAskill, who believes that "patriarchy" and "heteronormativity" are "destroying children's lives." She works with children between the ages of 2 and 5.

In an article explaining Gendersaurus Rex, she states: "It's about making work that can speak directly to the gender-variant child, the queer child, the homosexual child, the cis-gendered child who might feel constrained by the expectations inherent in being a girl or a boy.

"It's about using the power of art as a place to question, subvert, hide from, muddy, invert and take refuge from the oppression of everyday life."

MacAskill argues that "the norm is patriarchal, sexist, white and body-conformist" and calls for "some diversity," complaining that there is a lack of "non-heteronormative lives in our children's theater."

She asks: "What do we mean by queer? How do we talk about queerness outside of sexuality? How do we talk about sexuality and children in the same breath without being accused of summoning the specter of pedophilia?"

On hearing about the project, one parent told the Daily Express: "The very idea that someone can access my child to put these ideas into their heads is frankly horrifying.

"I absolutely object to this, and the fact that the public is funding it is sickening."

The Scottish government denies that it is funding the project. However, the Imaginate website states that the Scottish government is one of its major funders.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on November 22, 2016, 05:48:41 pm
Latest on scientist who mainstreamed pedophilia

Alfred Kinsey is known in the United States as the researcher who released the influential books on human sexual behavior in the 1940s and 1950s, regarded as catalysts for the sexual revolution.

The National Institutes of Health notes his studies as a college teacher on the gull wasp failed to earn him a desired promotion, so he jumped on a new academic pursuit of marriage and the family, titillating students with “the mechanics of intercourse” and teaching them that “nearly all so-called sexual perversions fall within the range of biological normality.”

Ultimately, he claimed that children, even infants, are sexual from birth and that the answer to what’s appropriate for human sexuality is just about anything. Even the left-leaning New York Times admitted author James Jones revealed Kinsey “had affairs with men, encouraged open marriages among his staff, stimulated himself with urethral insertion and ropes, and filmed sex in his attic.”

The truth about the man who has been called the “father of the sexual revolution” actually goes beyond that.

Judith Reisman, Ph.D., who long has researched Kinsey and his work, has announced that one of her books about Kinsey, “Stolen Honor Stolen Innocence,” is being published later this month in the French language.

It is being published by a pro-family organization in France that called out Kinsey’s work as “a weapon of mass destruction against the family.”

Her book, “Sexual Sabotage,” was published in Croatian in 2014, and another French group is planning to release that work in French in 2017.

Reisman is a scientific adviser to the California Protective Parents Association, former president of the Institute for Media Education and has consulted for four U.S. Department of Justice administrations. She also has worked with the U.S. Department of Education as well as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and has seen her work translated into many languages.

Her conclusion is that Kinsey almost assuredly violated children sexually and based his writings on the testimony of criminals who sexually assaulted children.

How else, she wonders, would anyone come up with the data in his infamous Table 34?

There, Kinsey claimed that an 11-month-old child experienced 10 orgasms in one hour, another 11-month-old had 14 in 38 minutes, a 2-year-old child had 11 in 65 minutes, a 4-year-old had 26 in 24 hours. A 10-year-old had 14 in the same time, and a 12-year-old had three in three minutes. Because someone wasn’t sure of those results, the experiment was repeated on the 12-year-old, who then reportedly experienced nine in two hours.

According to David Kupelian, author of “The Marketing of Evil,” Reisman found Table 34 “purports to be a scientific record of ‘multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males.'”

Wrote Kupelian: “Reisman wondered: How did Kinsey and his associates obtain this ‘research’ that infants as young as five months of age enjoyed sex? Child sexual abuse is a felony – how could such research be conducted legally? Why had nobody raised this issue before?”

Reisman herself explained: “Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad, to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for his alleged data on normal ‘child sexuality.’ Many of the crimes against children (oral and anal sodomy, genital intercourse and manual abuse) committed for Kinsey’s research are quantified in his own graphs and charts.”

In a commentary, Reisman and Mary McAlister wrote that the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University still is protecting Kinsey’s legacy, acting as a purveyor of his research, with the latest developments including reports the university was caught paying $200 for parts of aborted infants.

“This is the legacy of Alfred Kinsey,” they wrote. “While Kinsey’s work is lauded and quoted by the elites of American law and academia, other nations are beginning to understand Kinsey’s malevolent impact on the world’s people.”

Her work to expose Kinsey’s disturbing activities has included “Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences,” “Sexual Revolution” and “Stolen Honor, Stolen Innocence.”

And it’s making an impact. After she provided information in a trial, Croatia’s high court stunned sex-education experts by rejecting curriculum based on the work of Kinsey.

She had pointed out that Kinsey’s two books, known as the “Kinsey Reports,” were “based on a nonrepresentative group of Americans – including hundreds of sex offenders, prostitutes, prison inmates and exhibitionists.”

Reisman documents how some of Kinsey’s conclusions were based on data from serial pedophiles.

“Prisoners, prostitutes, homosexuals ‘1,400 sex offenders,’ ‘feeble minded’ and other such World War II ‘stay-at-home’ persons, rounded out the men who were to represent the average American.”

Explained Reisman: “Planned Parenthood (Margaret Sanger was a colleague) and legal power elitists joined arms to, as the French organization said, destroy the family, to merchandize and objectify women and children as products.

“That merchandizing is now coming full circle as unborn babies are divided and sold to the highest bidder at illustrious universities. This moral abyss has devolved naturally into live babies increasingly being sexual victimized by peers and pedophiles.”

She called on Congress to begin an investigation of Indiana University and its Kinsey Institute, and, if it is appropriate, to begin prosecutions.

“There still are victims, well over 80 years [old], willing to testify to their Kinsey-monitored child rapes, with cinema, to investigators. Such ‘scientific’ child sex abuse that reshaped law and public policy, should be at least as important as the sex abuse by Catholic clergy,” she wrote.

“The children of Table 34, and the millions of victims of the mantra, ‘children are sexual from birth’ finally deserve justice! We must at last know the truth of why and how we came to be a culture of adulterated adults, merchandisable children and exchangeable individuals. ”

Reisman has lectured at Princeton, Notre Dame, Georgetown, Pepperdine, Johns Hopkins, the FBI, the U.S. Air Force Academy, the University of Jerusalem, the University of Haifa and Tel Aviv University. She has been cited by the London Times, Time, Newsweek, the New York Times and the Washington Post. She has appeared on “Entertainment Tonight,” “Larry King Live,” “Donahue,” the “Today” show and “Crossfire.”

She’s been listed in “The World’s Who’s Who of Women.”


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on December 06, 2016, 04:46:52 pm
Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime

Here is the left again trying to make something evil good.

THINK back to your first childhood crush. Maybe it was a classmate or a friend next door. Most likely, through school and into adulthood, your affections continued to focus on others in your approximate age group. But imagine if they did not.

By some estimates, 1 percent of the male population continues, long after puberty, to find themselves attracted to prepubescent children. These people are living with pedophilia, a sexual attraction to prepubescents that often constitutes a mental illness. Unfortunately, our laws are failing them and, consequently, ignoring opportunities to prevent child abuse.

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders defines pedophilia as an intense and recurrent sexual interest in prepubescent children, and a disorder if it causes a person “marked distress or interpersonal difficulty” or if the person acts on his interests. Yet our laws ignore pedophilia until after the commission of a sexual offense, emphasizing punishment, not prevention.

Part of this failure stems from the misconception that pedophilia is the same as child molestation. One can live with pedophilia and not act on it. Sites like Virtuous Pedophiles provide support for pedophiles who do not molest children and believe that sex with children is wrong. It is not that these individuals are “inactive” or “nonpracticing” pedophiles, but rather that pedophilia is a status and not an act. In fact, research shows, about half of all child molesters are not sexually attracted to their victims.

A second misconception is that pedophilia is a choice. Recent research, while often limited to sex offenders — because of the stigma of pedophilia — suggests that the disorder may have neurological origins. Pedophilia could result from a failure in the brain to identify which environmental stimuli should provoke a sexual response. M.R.I.s of sex offenders with pedophilia show fewer of the neural pathways known as white matter in their brains. Men with pedophilia are three times more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous, a finding that strongly suggests a neurological cause. Some findings also suggest that disturbances in neurodevelopment in utero or early childhood increase the risk of pedophilia. Studies have also shown that men with pedophilia have, on average, lower scores on tests of visual-spatial ability and verbal memory.

The Virtuous Pedophiles website is full of testimonials of people who vow never to touch a child and yet live in terror. They must hide their disorder from everyone they know — or risk losing educational and job opportunities, and face the prospect of harassment and even violence. Many feel isolated; some contemplate suicide. The psychologist Jesse Bering, author of “Perv: The Sexual Deviant in All of Us,” writes that people with pedophilia “aren’t living their lives in the closet; they’re eternally hunkered down in a panic room.”

While treatment cannot eliminate a ****’s sexual interests, a combination of cognitive-behavioral therapy and medication can help him to manage urges and avoid committing crimes.

But the reason we don’t know enough about effective treatment is because research has usually been limited to those who have committed crimes.

Our current law is inconsistent and irrational. For example, federal law and 20 states allow courts to issue a civil order committing a sex offender, particularly one with a diagnosis of pedophilia, to a mental health facility immediately after the completion of his sentence — under standards that are much more lax than for ordinary “civil commitment” for people with mental illness. And yet, when it comes to public policies that might help people with pedophilia to come forward and seek treatment before they offend, the law omits pedophilia from protection.

The Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibit discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals with mental disabilities, in areas such as employment, education and medical care. Congress, however, explicitly excluded pedophilia from protection under these two crucial laws.

It’s time to revisit these categorical exclusions. Without legal protection, a **** cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support. He could lose his job, and future job prospects, if he is seen at a group-therapy session, asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist, or requests a limit in his interaction with children. Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime.

There’s no question that the extension of civil rights protections to people with pedophilia must be weighed against the health and safety needs of others, especially kids. It stands to reason that a **** should not be hired as a grade-school teacher. But both the A.D.A. and the Rehabilitation Act contain exemptions for people who are “not otherwise qualified” for a job or who pose “a direct threat to the health and safety of others” that can’t be eliminated by a reasonable accommodation. (This is why employers don’t have to hire blind bus drivers or mentally unstable security guards.)

The direct-threat analysis rejects the idea that employers can rely on generalizations; they must assess the specific case and rely on evidence, not presuppositions. Those who worry that employers would be compelled to hire dangerous pedophiles should look to H.I.V. case law, where for years courts were highly conservative, erring on the side of finding a direct threat, even into the late 1990s, when medical authorities were in agreement that people with H.I.V. could work safely in, for example, food services.

Removing the pedophilia exclusion would not undermine criminal justice or its role in responding to child abuse. It would not make it easier, for example, for someone accused of child molestation to plead not guilty by reason of insanity.

A **** should be held responsible for his conduct — but not for the underlying attraction. Arguing for the rights of scorned and misunderstood groups is never popular, particularly when they are associated with real harm. But the fact that pedophilia is so despised is precisely why our responses to it, in criminal justice and mental health, have been so inconsistent and counterproductive. Acknowledging that pedophiles have a mental disorder, and removing the obstacles to their coming forward and seeking help, is not only the right thing to do, but it would also advance efforts to protect children from harm.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on December 12, 2016, 02:17:28 am

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on March 20, 2017, 03:29:19 pm

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on April 28, 2017, 03:45:07 pm

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on June 14, 2017, 03:16:40 pm
Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg favors decriminalizing pedophilia and child sex trafficking

Posted by Dr. Eowyn

The legal definition of “age of consent” is:

Age of consent refers to the legally defined age at which a person is no longer required to obtain parental consent to get married. It also refers to the age at which a person is held to have the capacity to voluntarily agree to sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse with a person under the age of consent may lead to criminal charges of statutory **** or sexual assault . . . .

Statutory **** is sex between an adult and a minor below the age of consent. Every state has a statutory **** law in some form. The age of consent varies from state to state, but is generally from 16 – 18 years of age. . . . Consent of the victim and belief that the victim is of the age of consent are usually considered immaterial.

A **** is an adult with “sexual fondness for and activity” with children, i.e., minors below the age of consent. Pedophilia is legally defined as sexual child abuse, i.e., any sexual activity with a minor below the age of consent, which includes fondling a child’s genitals, intercourse, incest, ****, sodomy, exhibitionism, and commercial exploitation of children through prostitution or the production of pornographic materials.

Since the age of consent in the United States which varies from state to state is from 16 to 18, lowering the age of consent to 12 would legalize pedophilia of children age 12 and above.

That is exactly what Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a Clinton appointee and daughter of Russian Jewish immigrants, recommends in a co-authored book that led to sweeping changes made by the federal government in the name of sex equality.


In 1977 when Ginsburg was General Counsel of the ACLU, she co-authored (with Brenda Feigen-Fasteau) Sex Bias in the U.S. Code: A Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which was published by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in April 1977, for which Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau were paid with federal funds under Contract No. CR3AK010.
READ MORE White Professor Awarded $4.9M After Being Fired From Black College To Make It 'Blacker'

The source of the information and quotes from Sex Bias in the U.S. Code you’ll read below is Executive Director of Eagle Forum Susan Hirschmann’s Testimony Re. Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the Senate Judiciary Committee, July 23, 1993.

The 230-page Sex Bias in the U.S. Code identifies hundreds of federal laws alleged to discriminate against women and recommends an avalanche of government and social changes, including:

Military draft and combat duty for women.
Legalization of prostitution.
Sex integration of prisons, reformatories, schools and colleges and their activities (including sports), all-girls and all-boys organizations, and fraternities and sororities.
Changing the names of the Boy Scouts, Girls Scouts and Big Brothers of America to reflect sex integration.
Elimination of the traditional family concept of husband as breadwinner and wife as homemaker.
Comprehensive government child-care.
Adoption of sex-neutral language, e.g., “artificial” instead of “manmade”; “person, human” instead of “man, woman”; and plural nouns “they” and “them” instead of “singular third person pronouns”. At the same time, however, Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau hypocritically insist that the U.S. Department of Labor retains its “Women’s Bureau”.

Ginsburg wrote on p. 102 of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code:

Eliminate the phrase ‘carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife, who has not attained the age of 16 years’ and substitute a federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense . . . . A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, . . . [and] the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old.

Ginsburg (and her co-author) also recommends that the Mann Act be repealed. The Mann Act is a federal law passed in 1910 which makes it a felony to engage in interstate or foreign commerce transport of “any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose”.

From Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, pp. 98-99:

The Mann Act . . . poses the invasion of privacy issue in an acute form. The Mann Act also is offensive because of the image of women it perpetuates . . . . It was meant to protect from ‘the villainous interstate and international traffic in women and girls,’ ‘those women and girls who, if given a fair chance, would, in all human probability, have been good wives and mothers and useful citizens. . . .’

In other words, if Ruth Bader Ginsburg has her way, sexual abuse of children 12-years or older would not be a crime, nor would child sex trafficking.

Ginsburg will be 84 next month. May President Trump be given the opportunity to nominate her replacement on the Supreme Court.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on June 15, 2017, 11:08:49 am

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on June 27, 2017, 04:43:33 pm
British PM Theresa May **** Ring Cover-up Exposed Prime Minister's ties to serial killer and pedophilia network revealed By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle on 11th June 2017 @ 10.53am theresa may s connections to an elite **** ring have been covered up © press Theresa May's connections to an Elite **** ring have been covered up. British Prime Minister Theresa May's connections to a serial killer and an Elite **** ring have been revealed after a sloppy cover-up has backfired. The PM has caused a lot of controversies in relation to pedophilia during her career, most notably, as her time as Home Secretary, she pushed for a change in legislation that would give more leniency to sex offenders. She backed a claim that pedophiles should be allowed to adopt children because it was "unfair" to stop them and a "breach of their human rights". One of the arguments for the change in the law was that although **** crimes were on the rise, the number of pedophiles that also murder children was "still quite low". Now, it appears, that May, or her people, have been covering up her family history, by removing any mention of her father from the internet. Rather than have the desired effect of whitewashing her unsavory connections, it's had the reverse effect and drawn attention to what has been hidden. All links relating to Theresa May's father, Hubert Brasier, have been deleted, including a Wikipedia page about his life. Of course, it's still possible to view archived versions of these web pages, and this has not only aroused suspicion but also prompted an investigation into what exactly has been covered up.

Read more at: http://www.neonnettle.com/features/975-british-pm-theresa-may-****-ring-cover-up-exposed
© Neon Nettle

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 03, 2017, 10:19:38 am
‘Until a reboot do us part’: Japanese guys are marrying VR brides (VIDEO)
Published time: 1 Jul, 2017 13:44
Edited time: 2 Jul, 2017 12:37

The ‘couple’ exchange vows and gaze into each other's eyes via VR headset before engaging in a remarkably awkward first kiss as husband and wife in front of their equally 'real' wedding guests.

The concept stems from the anime video game 'Niitzuma Lovely x Cation' in which players can develop and foster relationships with virtual girlfriends.

For players in particularly committed relationships with their anime paramours, the game’s creators developed a way for the couples to be joined together in virtual matrimony.

No update as of yet on how the couple spent their first night as husband and wife. On a separate note, VR sex suits are now a thing.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 05, 2017, 03:01:46 pm
Sex robots could provide therapy and treat loneliness in care homes
Published time: 5 Jul, 2017 14:57

Elderly people living in care homes could soon be enjoying the company of specifically designed sex robots, according to a leading organization in the field.

The freakishly realistic robots could be widely available within the next decade, used not just by fetishists but as a tool for sexual therapy and communication.

The Foundation for Responsible Robotics (FRR) said although there are downsides to their use, the arrival of the sex machine is unstoppable.

“I can tell you that robots are certainly coming,” said Noel Sharkey, emeritus professor of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence at the University of Sheffield, and co-founder of the FRR.

“The concern is that this is going on [and] nobody is talking about it. People snigger about them, but they are actually shipping quite a lot and we are going to see them a lot more.”

Professor Sharkey, who was speaking on Wednesday at the launch of a new consultation report, said it is time for the government to step in and start regulating sex bots.

“They are being proposed for the elderly in care homes, which I think is controversial. If you have severe Alzheimer’s you can’t really tell the difference,” said the researcher.

“We need to think about as a society what we want to do about it.”


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 07, 2017, 01:21:37 pm
New Report Considers The Problems That Could Arise From Sex Robots

A new report from the Foundation for Responsible Robotics considers the problems that could arise from sex robots, including social isolation, love, prostitution, and pedophilia.

“Would people have sex with a robot?,” “What kind of relationship could we have with a sex robot?,” “Will robot sex workers and bordellos be acceptable?,” “Will sex robots change societal perceptions of gender?,” “Could intimacy with robots lead to greater social isolation?,” “Could robots help with sexual healing and therapy?,” and “Would sex robots help to reduce sex crimes?” are all questions included in the 44-page report.

“In 2017 most liberal societies accept or tolerate sex in many different forms and varieties. Sex toys and **** aids have been used for centuries and can be easily purchased in stores in many countries. Now companies are developing robots for sexual gratification,” explain the foundation in their report. “But a robot designed for sex may have different impacts when compared with other sex aids. Those currently being developed are essentially pornographic representations of the human body – mostly female.”

Such representations combined with human anthropomorphism may lead many to perceive robots as a new ontological category that exists in a fantasy between the living and the inanimate. This is reinforced by robot manufacturers with an eye to the future. They understand the market importance of adding intimacy, companionship, and conversation to sexual gratification.

The aim of this consultation report is to present an objective summary of the issues and various opinions about what could be our most intimate association with technological artefacts. We do not contemplate or speculate about far future robots with personhood – that could have all manner of imagined properties. We focus instead on significant issues that we may have to deal with in the foreseeable future over the next 5 to 10 years.

On the topic of robot sex workers, the report claims, “While we have no direct evidence about the acceptability of sex robot bordellos, one poll suggests quite strongly that they would be acceptable,” before adding, “The additional repertoire offered by robots could well increase demand. Although we found no evidence for the notion that sex robots would stop sex trafficking, we found some evidence to the contrary.”

For the potential issue of social isolation, the foundation admits, “We have no direct evidence to answer this question and it would be considered unethical to set up controlled experiments.”

However, they also explained that the cited scholars in the report “are pretty much in agreement that sex with robots could or will lead to social isolation.”

“The reasons given varied,” they elaborated. “Spending time in a robot relationship could create an inability to form human friendships; robot don’t meet the species specific needs of humans; sex robots could desensitize humans to intimacy and empathy, which can only be developed through experiencing human interaction and mutual consenting relationships; real sexual relationships could become overwhelming because relations with robots are easier.”

On the issue of using robots for “sexual healing,” the foundation claims that “it is possible” the machines could “potentially help some people” with anxiety and other sexual issues, while the topic of using robots to stop sex crimes proved controversial.

Some of the cites sources claimed pedophiles and others with sexual disorders or aggressive desires could be stopped from enacting their fantasies in real life by using robots. However, others claimed it could encourage them further.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 11, 2017, 01:47:58 pm
You’ll Be Sickened To Know How US Taxpayers Are Funding A Child **** Epidemic At The United Nations
On February 28, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres confirmed that UN peacekeepers and civilian staff faced 145 allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse impacting on 311 victims in 2016 alone. There are nearly 40 cases so far in 2017. Many of the victims, by the UN’s own admission, are children. As one 11-year-old child put it, “I didn’t have breasts yet, but he still raped me.” It is the one indefensible act. Child ****.


The United Nations, heavily subsidized by U.S. taxpayers’ dollars, has faced a widespread child sexual abuse problem for years and reacted with little more than silence.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Have you ever wondered why, after a disaster like a hurricane or a tsunami in a third-world or developing country, that so many “charitable organizations” like the UN and the Clinton Foundation rush to go there? It’s to help the victims, right? Wrong. It’s so they can go there and exploit them while they are helpless, with a special focus on the children. NTEB has spoken to numerous child sex trafficking prevention groups in Haiti who have told us that the main customers of child sex trafficking establishments are United States congressmen and senators. The United Nations “peacekeepers” are raping children around the world, and they are protected by the UN so they will never face trial. This is what YOUR tax dollars are funding. Just thought you’d like to know.

On February 28, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres confirmed that UN peacekeepers and civilian staff faced 145 allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse impacting on 311 victims in 2016 alone. There are nearly 40 cases so far in 2017. Many of the victims, by the UN’s own admission, are children.

As one 11-year-old child put it, “I didn’t have breasts yet, but he still raped me.” It is the one indefensible act. Child ****.

Even the UN recognises that these numbers, while huge, are likely to be the tip of the iceberg and represent only the crimes that have been reported, involving mainly just one part of the UN: Peacekeeping.
CAR: ‘Our children were raped by peacekeepers’

These numbers are a small proportion of the sex and child **** crimes committed by UN staff and peacekeepers over at least the last two decades.

Neither the sex scandals of the UN in the Bosnian War dramatized in the 2010 film Whistleblower nor the long-running “Food for Sex” scandals of the early 2000s. are covered in these figures. What is worse, decision makers have known this for years but have failed to crack down.

A Save the Children report over a decade ago found abuse at all age levels “from 8 to 18,” though the victims older than twelve were identified as being “regularly involved in ‘selling sex.’” The Save report went on to say that, among the children interviewed, “all of the respondents clearly stated that they felt that the scale of the problem affected over half of the girls in their locations.”

The outbreak of such heinous activity at the UN highlights just how vulnerable the victims are. Faced with legal safeguards in the United States and Western countries, evil men have found that it is easy to gain access to children in developing countries. People in power know this, so much so that since 1999 authorities have warned that problem of paedophiles in the aid world is on a level with sex tourism.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on July 16, 2017, 03:00:51 pm
Teen Vogue’s ‘Tutorial’ on Anal Sex Omits Serious Risks

Teen Vogue recently continued its agenda-driven mission with a new “tutorial” for its young readers on how to have anal sex.

The publication featured an article by “sex educator” Gigi Engle titled “Anal Sex: What You Need to Know,” and, apparently, Engle, who touts on her Facebook account that she is a “writer, sex expert, and speaker,” and Teen Vogue do not think young girls considering anal sex “need to know” the serious dangers and risks associated with the activity:


Ironically, Engle begins her “tutorial” with the statement, “When it comes to your body, it’s important that you have the facts. Being in the dark is not doing your sexual health or self-understanding any favors.”

“This is anal 101, for teens, beginners, and all inquisitive folk,” she nevertheless plunges ahead, defending anal sex as “a perfectly natural way to engage in sexual activity.”

Though Engle asserts, “Enthusiastic consent is necessary for both parties to enjoy” anal sex, the reality is that many of Teen Vogue’s readers are under the age of consent.

And while she does provide the perfunctory warning to her teen students that condoms will help to protect against sexually transmitted infections, Engle spends much more time teaching them which lube to use and how to insert sex toys into their butts to “warm [themselves] up” for “larger objects.”

Engle acknowledges to her young students who might be grossed out at the thought of coming into contact with someone else’s “poop” that, yes, “you will come in contact with some fecal matter,” but she then wags her finger at any teen who has a problem with that.

“You are entering a butthole,” she writes. “It is where poop comes out. Expecting to do anal play and see zero poop isn’t particularly realistic. It’s NOT a big deal. Everyone poops. Everyone has a butt.”

The fact is, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states, “Anal sex is the riskiest sexual behavior for getting and transmitting HIV for men and women.”

The CDC continues:

    Being a receptive partner during anal sex is the highest-risk sexual activity for getting HIV. The bottom’s risk of getting HIV is very high because the lining of the rectum is thin and may allow HIV to enter the body during anal sex.

    The insertive partner is also at risk for getting HIV during anal sex. HIV may enter the top partner’s body through the opening at the tip of the **** (or urethra) or through small cuts, scratches, or open sores on the ****.

The agency also warns against the dangers of contracting other sexually transmitted diseases, such as chlamydia and gonorrhea, through anal sex, in addition to hepatitis A, B, and C, parasites and intestinal amoebas, and bacterial infections through contact with feces.

Engle’s piece set off a firestorm:

One outraged “activist mommy” received more than one million views to her video posted on Facebook that urged Teen Vogue to be pulled from supermarkets and convenience stores.

The U.K.’s Independent takes a feminist view of the controversial piece, arguing that, in defining her anal sex partners as “prostate owners” and “non-prostate owners,” Engle is actually forcing women to still be defined by their relationship to men.

The Independent observes that missing from Engle’s “non-prostate owner” anatomy picture presented in her article is a critical part of female sexual anatomy: the clitoris:

    What is this teaching the audience of a magazine aimed at teenage girls? It tells them their identity is not “woman”, but rather “non-man”. It tells them that should they consent to anal sex, their body is just a hole for the man to penetrate, and the part of their body that is most sensitive and reliable for the female orgasm is so irrelevant that it doesn’t even warrant a label. It tells them that consenting to anal sex is not about their pleasure, but about their partner’s.

“Teen Vogue’s target audience is not non-prostate owners seeking to provide sexual satisfaction to men through their anus,” the Independent also states. “Teen Vogue’s target audience is teenage girls, most under the legal age of consent, who are deserving of adult women to teach them to value themselves for who they are, not by what they are in relation to men.”

The publication – which at one time was focused on fashions, makeup tips, and celebrities – now is a mouthpiece for the radical feminist and LGBT movements and the abortion industry, as well as an activist arm of the anti-Trump agenda.

“I think the readers that we reach would all consider themselves activists, too,” said Teen Vogue editor Elaine Welteroth in an interview with the Guardian in February.

Digital director Phillip Picardi runs the bulk of Teen Vogue’s political content, which, according to the Guardian, “has come to play a key role in repositioning the title as a passionate and informed, if unexpected, voice for the resistance.”

Picardi defended the anal sex piece on Twitter:

    But until queer sex, love, and families are included in education, we're doing a dangerous and potentially lethal disservice…

    — Phillip Picardi (@pfpicardi) July 14, 2017

    to a growing population. Gen Z will be our queerest and most fearless generation yet.

    — Phillip Picardi (@pfpicardi) July 14, 2017

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 14, 2017, 02:04:54 pm

Primary school **** epidemic sees children as young as five being expelled, NSPCC warns

Thousands of pupils have been either permanently or temporarily excluded over the past four years for sexual misdemeanors

9 August 2017 • 12:01am

An epidemic of pornography is sweeping through Britain's schools with children as young as five being expelled for sexual misconduct.

Thousands of pupils have been either permanently or temporarily excluded over the past four years for sexual misdemeanours including watching pornography or sharing indecent images, according to figures obtained by the Press Association.

The figures, from local councils, do not include those where children were victims of staff or adult volunteers.

Data released by the Department for Education (DfE) showed more than 800 primary school children have been excluded for "sexual misconduct" since 2013. The number for senior school students, over the same period of time, was 8,000.

Charities warned that schools should prevent "harmful sexual behaviour" among children by teaching them about consent.

An NSPCC spokesman said: "Preventing harmful sexual behaviour through proper, up-to-date sex and relationships education is immeasurably better than excluding children after the harm has been done.

"By giving children the right information … we can teach them how to treat others and how to know when something is not right."

The spokesman said that the school curriculum should be updated to teach children about the dangers of sexting and online ****.

"Social media, sexting, online **** and dating apps did not exist when sex education was introduced on the curriculum a generation ago," they said.

"It must be dragged into the 21st century, it must be consistent, and it must be offered in every school."

Schools said children could be censured under the term "sexual misconduct" for a range of issues, including sexual abuse, assault, bullying, graffiti, harassment, and lewd behaviour.

Other examples included holding, distributing or requesting indecent images, accessing internet pornography, and sexual misconduct on social media.

Sarah Green, co-director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, said the figures were "alarming".

"These figures show that girls and boys are being failed by those who should protect them," she said.

Javed Khan, chief executive at the children's charity Barnardo's said that often children who sexually harm others have experienced some form of sexual abuse and trauma.

"They need specialist support to help them recover and understand why their behaviour is harmful," he said.

A DfE spokesman said: "Sexual assault of any kind is an offence. Schools should be safe places and we issue safeguarding guidance to protect pupil welfare."

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on August 30, 2017, 11:02:10 am
Breaking: Look Who Was Just Indicted In Arizona!!!

According to reports, an Arizona woman has been indicted for filming child sex acts.

Breaking911 reported: PHOENIX – A State Grand Jury indicted Keri Ann Harwood on five counts of Sexual Exploitation of a Minor, two counts of Molestation of a Child, and three counts of Sexual Conduct with a Minor.

The indictment alleges that Harwood took videos of herself sexually exploiting two children between May 01, 2017 and August 13, 2017. These videos were emailed to an individual in another state.

AZ Central reported: Authorities say a neighbor who plays Pokemon Go with Harwood found the sexually explicit videos in Harwood’s Gmail after noticing several PayPal transactions and reported her to the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.

The neighbor was able to access Harwood’s email account because she gave him her Pokemon Go login information and asked him to catch Pokemon for her, court records said.

Deputies said Harwood was sending videos of her bathing and touching the children, ages 6 and 3 years old, to a man they believe lives in Texas. When confronted by authorities, records show, she claimed that she needed the money and didn’t want to disappoint the man, with whom she had been sexting for some time.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on September 18, 2017, 10:01:32 pm
Child-Adult Sex 'Not That Bad?' What's Happening to America's Morals
Lorie Johnson
4-6 minutes

Two studies suggesting children who have sex with adults suffer little to no emotional damage are being met with shocking silence. Compare that to twenty years ago, when nearly the same research received resounding condemnation from both the legislative and scientific communities.

Psychologist Bruce Rind released two published studies within the last year.  One examined the long-term impact of underage boys having sex with much older, adult men.  The second on underage girls having sex with much older, adult women.  Overall, Rind concludes that such experiences are neither necessarily abusive nor traumatic, and tend not to cause lifelong emotional pain and dysfunction. 

Instead, Rind indicates sexual encounters between minors as young as age thirteen and much older adults of the same sex can be a positive, enjoyable experience for the young person, who can grow up to be, "just as healthy, happy, sexually well adjusted, and successful in educational and career achievement."

In 1998, Rind published similar studies and conclusions, which received strong backlash. Now, nearly twenty years later, the same basic information is being met with deafening silence.   

Back then, the American Psychological Association condemned Rind's claims.  Furthermore, a 1999 Resolution passed by both houses of Congress rejects Rind's published conclusions "that indicate that sexual relationships between adults and ``willing'' children are less harmful than believed and might be positive for ``willing'' children," adding Congress opposes "attempts to normalize adult-child sex or to lower the age of consent."  The resolution stated, "Children are a precious gift and responsibility given to parents by God," and, "Elected officials have a duty to inform and counter actions they consider damaging to children, parents, families, and society."

Mark Regnerus, associate professor of sociology at the University of Texas at Austin and the author of Cheap Sex: The Transformation of Men, Marriage and Monogamy told CBN News today's lawmakers' indifference to child-adult sex is disturbing.

"Many are afraid of sounding "negative" about sex today, and being pilloried on social media for it," he explained, "The law still treats such acts as statutory ****, but the share of cases that are actually being brought to justice is very small." 

Regnerus continued, "We focus on the educator-student interactions, and pretty much little of nothing else. Teachers who transgress here seem to be the only cases of interest anymore. I'm not making claims about what just punishments ought to be. I'm sounding an alarm that there is published, peer-reviewed (so-called) "evidence" now that minor-adult sex is not very problematic. And I very much think that is not the case."

Regnerus said Rind's research can be discredited for a number of reasons. The data is old, dating as far back as the 1930's.  It's a small sample, looking at a total of a mere 47 cases of child-adult sexual relationships, approximately.

Regmerus says it's highly erroneous for Rind to conclude that just because the child victims report their sexual encounter with a much older adult was "wanted" and he or she "liked it," doesn't mean the interaction wasn't psychologically harmful. 

Likewise, adults, who as children, had sexual encounters with much older adults who self-report they are happy and healthy, might not accurately assess their own emotional well-being and might not recognize the impact those acts had on their psyche. 

"The failure to recognize that consent and pleasure do not prevent harm and pain downstream, and unequal power is utterly unavoidable here," Regmerus said, "Adults have a moral responsibility to consider minors as sexually off-limits, and act in consonance with that. Rind seems to think we should answer moral questions scientifically. I think that is unwise."


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 28, 2017, 06:12:20 pm
Hugh Hefner was born and raised in Chicago, Illinois.

Hefner describes his religious upbringing as in a “conservative, Midwestern, Methodist” family.1 And in talking about it, Hefner paints a picture of guilt-ridden Puritanism, an environment and lifestyle he rejected and that caused him to become the “pamphleteer”2 of the sexual revolution.3

His current views of religion are:

a) it’s ridiculous.

b) no one should claim to know the answers to these cosmic questions.

It all amounts to a somewhat antagonistic agnosticism. He has said:

    It’s perfectly clear to me that religion is a myth. It’s something we have invented to explain the inexplicable…
What does it all mean — if it has any meaning at all? But how can it all exist if it doesn’t have some kind of meaning? I think anyone who suggests that they have the answer is motivated by the need to invent answers, because we have no such answers.4

So we can’t know the answer to tough, cosmological questions. Fair enough. But what about religion’s utility as instilling morals into society (for fear of damnation in the afterlife, of course)? He says:

    An afterlife would be a really good deal. Yeah, I would vote in favor of that. But in the meantime, I urge one and all to live this life as if there is no reward in the afterlife and to do it in a moral way that leaves this world a little better place than you found it

Politics and Pornography

Unsurprisingly, Hefner’s politics have historically been oriented toward First Amendment rights and positioned against conservatism. His business has, for its entire existence, been pitted against “traditional” values of morality, decency and purity–and he’s become quite the warrior.

So important is freedom of expression to Hefner that he has established two awards that he gives out to deserving recipients. One is the Hugh M. Hefner First Amendment award, given to 100 embattled defenders of First Amendment rights every year. The second is the Freedom of Expression Award, given to one person every year who is “dedicated to defending, advocating, or supporting the First Amendment through their personal or professional pursuits.”6

In the realm of party politics, Hefner is a longtime Democrat–a very longtime Democrat. He said:

    I was a Democrat in a Republican household before I could even vote

Hefner has given over $130,000 to political candidates and organizations–and not a single Republican.8

And he’s quite liberal. Hefner feels that his media empire has been a liberating force for women, that what some feminists might consider sexual exploitation, he considers a chance to strut their stuff and fly in the face of Puritanical bondage.9 He said:

    We fought for birth control rights and the change in birth control laws, the change in abortion laws, we fought cases to give women the right to choose…10

Most recently, Hefner has thrown his considerable clout behind the gay marriage movement, making an official statement on the subject. An excerpt:

    Today, in every instance of sexual rights falling under attack, you’ll find legislation forced into place by people who practice discrimination disguised as religious freedom. Their goal is to dehumanize everyone’s sexuality and reduce us to using sex for the sole purpose of perpetuating our species. To that end, they will criminalize your entire sex life.11

Keep on truckin’ Hef. You and your scantily-clad bunnies are as American as apple pie and baseball.

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on September 30, 2017, 11:09:29 am

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Psalm 51:17 on October 09, 2017, 09:34:07 pm

Breaking: California is now a sanctuary state for another type of crime


/pol/ News Infinity @polNewsInfinity

California is now wanting to move people off the sex-offender list if they possessed child pornography.

California isn’t safe for children.
3:00 PM - Oct 9, 2017

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on February 04, 2018, 08:19:12 pm
New Planned Parenthood President Worked at Kinsey Institute, Named for Man Who Sexually Abused Children

The Planned Parenthood abortion business has hired a new president and CEO. No this is not the replacement for Cecile Richards in the national headquarters, but this is a replacement for the CEO of Planned Parenthood’s affiliate in the Midwest.

The abortion company hired Brandon Hill to head up its affiliate that covers the states of Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma and Arkansas.

He’ll is the former executive director of a center for Research into sexual issues. But his ties with the Kinsey Institute at the University of Indiana or raised a number of pro-life eyebrows. The Kinsey Institute has a sordid history and its namesake is known for its connections to pedophilia and sexual abuse.

Here’s more:

    The regional office of Planned Parenthood has selected a new president and CEO.

    Brandon Hill, formerly executive director of the Center for Interdisciplinary Inquiry and Innovation in Sexual and Reproductive Health at the University of Chicago, assumed the role on Thursday.

    Hill says he’s eager to move from reproductive research to advocacy.

    “I think we’re in a particularly critical time in this political landscape to where I couldn’t just stay in my lab,” Hill says.

    Hill is also a research fellow at the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction at Indiana University, and he has a history of work as a clinic counselor for Planned Parenthood. He holds a Ph.D. in gender studies from Indiana University.

Dr. Alfred Kinsey authored the “Kinsey Reports” in 1948 and 1953. These reports were the basis for a sexual revolution that promoted and sanctioned pedophelia. Kinsey’s research was disproportionally based on surveys of prison inmates, sex offenders, and prostitutes.

The pro-life group Concerned Women for America once issued a report titled A Nation Deceived that further chronicled Kinsey. It said: “To obtain data about the sexual behavior of children, Dr. Kinsey worked with trained pedophiles who sexually abused hundreds of children (as young as two months) to prove to the world that infants, toddlers, and juveniles could enjoy sex pre-puberty with the help of an adult. Their sexual torture was recorded as pleasure.”

“Instead of being lionized, Kinsey’s proper place is with Nazi doctor Josef Mengele or your average Hollywood horror flick mad scientist,” Robert Knight of Concerned Women of America’s Culture & Family Institute said.

Knight calls Kinsey the godfather of the “campaign to strike down abortion laws,” adding, “he was a sexual revolutionary masquerading as an objective scientist.”

Meanwhile Focus on the Family and other groups blame Kinsey for ushering in an era of sex education that has led to promiscuity and abortion on demand.

Pro-Life attorney Matt Barber has previously written about Kinsey.

    Even today, most are completely unaware that during his tenure at Indiana University, Kinsey facilitated, with stopwatches and ledgers, the systematic sexual abuse of hundreds, if not thousands, of children and infants – all in the name of science.

    Among other things, Kinsey asserted that children are “sexual from birth.” He further concluded, based upon experiments he directed and documented in his infamous Table 34, that adult-child sex is harmless, even beneficial, and described child “orgasm” as “culminating in extreme trembling, collapse, loss of color, and sometimes fainting. …” Many children suffered “excruciating pain,” he observed, “and [would] scream if movement [was] continued.” Some “[would] fight away from the [adult] partner and may make violent attempts to avoid climax, although they derive[d] definite pleasure from the situation.”

    Yeah. Sounds like it.

    It’s little wonder that Dr. Reisman identifies Kinsey as a “sexual psychopath.” These children were as young as 2 months old.

Planned Parenthood kills children in abortions so it’s not too surprising that Hill is a research fellow at the Kinsey Institute, named for a man who sexually abused them.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on March 06, 2018, 06:30:43 pm
Facebook Survey: 'Should We Allow Men to Ask Children for Sexual Photos'

Facebook has apologized for a recent user survey which asked if pedophiles should be allowed to request sexual images from children on the social media platform.

The Guardian reports that Facebook has apologized for a recent user survey which asked users to outline how they believed the company should deal with pedophiles grooming children on the platform. One question stated, “There are a wide range of topics and behaviors that appear on Facebook.” It continued, “In thinking about an ideal world where you could set Facebook’s policies, how would you handle the following: a private message in which an adult man asks a 14-year-old girl for sexual pictures.”

Users could select options such as. “This content should be allowed on Facebook, and I would not mind seeing it,” or “This content should be allowed on Facebook, but I don’t want to see it,” or “This content should not be allowed on Facebook, and no one should be to see it” and finally, “I have no preference on this topic.”

Another question asked whether an adult man should be allowed to ask for sexual pictures of an underage child on Facebook, the options ranged from “Facebook users decide the rules by voting and tell Facebook” and “Facebook decides the rules on its own.”

REST: http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/03/05/facebook-survey-should-we-allow-men-to-ask-children-for-sexual-photos/

Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on April 30, 2018, 06:05:32 pm
K-12 Students to Participate in 'Day of Silence' in Support of LGBT Rights

 Friday, April 27th has been designated as a Day of Silence (DOS). On this day, students who are gay, trans, and bisexual and their supporters will go through the entire school day without speaking in order to draw attention to the LGBT cause.

The Day of Silence website describes the event this way:

“GLSEN’s Day of Silence, this year on Friday, April 27, is a student-led national event where folks take a vow of silence to highlight the silencing and erasure of LGBTQ people at school.

To start, K-12 students and educators should register their participation.”

Some students will even go so far as to put tape over their mouths to prove their point.

Charisma News writer Janet Boynes, who used to be a lesbian herself before coming to the Lord, questions the wisdom of exposing children as young as kindergarten and preschool ages to the LGBT agenda.

“Our society has made a dangerous move in going from tolerance to celebration of LGBT—especially when kids are celebrating harmful sexual behaviors that can have life-threatening consequences,” writes Boynes.

Some Christian families are choosing to keep their children home from school on the Day of Silence, while others are using this as an occasion to talk to their children about this issue.

“Whether you keep your children home or allow them to go to school on the Day of Silence, be sure to let your voice be heard,” says Boynes.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on May 20, 2018, 05:51:00 pm
There is no ‘biological sex’

In an apparent competition among American public school boards to see which sex-education program can be made the most graphic and politically correct, there’s likely a new leader.

In a stunning development, the Fairfax County School Board in Northern Virginia is considering teaching children there is no such thing as “biological sex” and also that “clergy” are not to be trusted if students have questions.

Within just the past few weeks, WND has reported on the Albemarle district in Virginia, which was warned its explicit sex videos to classes of 14-year-old girls likely were felony violations of state and federal laws.

And the Sunnyside Unified School District in Tucson, Arizona, was warned that its proposed sex-ed program is both “illegal” and “obscene.”

Now, according to the Family Research Council, comes the Fairfax board.

“Already, each public school student must suffer through 80 hours of sex ed. That’s not a typo: 8-0,” the report said. “They call it ‘Family Life Education’ but everybody knows that’s a joke. You won’t find lessons on building happy marriages and healthy families here. No, instead you’ll find hour after hour of instruction on your evolving ‘sexual identity,’ on the proper handling of contraceptive drugs and devices, and on how to give consent for sex.”

But the report by Cathy Ruse said the move to something less “repressive” was being considered.

She noted among the ideas being reviewed was to teach children “they weren’t actually born male or female. Advisers scrubbed ‘biological sex’ from all lessons and in its place put the politically charged ‘gender-fluid’ propaganda term ‘sex assigned at birth.’ As one adviser explained: ‘Biological sex is meaningless!'”

Further, the board’s plan is to teach seventh and eighth grade students “to embrace transgender identity, but don’t tell them about the risks.”

“Advisers voted against telling children about any of the health risks and side effects from ‘gender transitioning.'”

The board also wants to stop teaching students “abstinence is the only 100 percent effective method” to prevent sexually transmitted diseases.

But they are to be taught “how to use every imaginable contraceptive drug, device, and cream.”

They want to make lessons on dating and family mandatory, meaning students would not be able to opt out, mostly likely.

And they want to remove an “offensive” word.

“The sex ed advisers have finally identified a word that was too offensive for students to hear. They voted to strip the word ‘clergy’ from the list of trusted adults that students might consult with sexual identity concerns.”

FRC said the district in Falls Church, Virginia, is taking comments on the plan until June 8.

“Fairfax kids deserve better. And the Fairfax School Board members need to find another line of work,” the FRC report said.

The warning to Sunnyside schools in Arizona came from Liberty Counsel, which said the Planned Parenthood-linked “Rights, Respect, Responsibility” program for children references necrophilia, promotes abortion and homosexuality, and “imposes radical, unscientific, political ideas about gender and sexuality on impressionable children.”

The legal team, representing parents in the district, is advising the school board, led by president Buck Crouch, against the “comprehensive sex education” indoctrination being promoted by “Advocates for Youth.” The program uses abortion-industry-promoted “standards” based “upon the sex data of Alfred Kinsey, which included timed-with-a-stopwatch ‘orgasms’ for infants as young as two months old.”

“The Sunnyside Unified School District is hereby on notice of the many legal violations contained in the 3Rs curriculum. The board should reject the 3Rs curriculum in its entirety, and adopt true abstinence-based curricula which provides accurate information, and respects student and parent rights, consistent with Arizona state standards. There are many such,” the Liberty Counsel letter said.

“However, if the district nonetheless illegally adopts the curriculum in violation of the current applicable, binding Arizona statutes set forth above, Liberty Counsel is prepared to take additional action to prevent irreparable harm to the rights of our numerous local constituents.”

The Liberty Counsel letter warned: “Displaying and advertising material that is obscene or harmful to minors is illegal under Ariz. Rev. Stat. [Paragraph] 13-3506. ‘It is unlawful for any person, with knowledge of the character of the item involved, to recklessly furnish, present, provide, make available, give, lend, show, advertise or distribute to minors any item that is harmful to minors.’ Yet 3Rs does exactly that, in 12th grade, instructing the teacher to present, show, and advertise and discuss pornographic magazines such as Playboy, Playgirl, and Penthouse.”

In fact, its lesson involving Playboy and Penthouse “is a Class 6 felony.”

Liberty Counsel told the Albemarle district its programming, also from Planned Parenthood, is “gutter trash.”

“This is not education. This is raping children. The school district has caused irreversible harm to children and parents. The school must never allow this to happen again,” the legal team said.

The curriculum was forced on students during a presentation from a group called Sexual Assault Resource Agency, which, Liberty Counsel explained, was allowed to present “pornographic videos and curriculum” to students.

Liberty Counsel now represents the parents of the mostly 14-year-old girls at West Albemarle County High school who were in “Family Life Education” classes on April 13. The classes were led by Lexie Huston, an employee of Planned Parenthood-linked SARA, the legal team said.

In a letter to the district and its officials, Liberty Counsel pointed out the presentation violated Virginia law protecting minors, including a ban on abusing children, encouraging them to engage in sex acts or perform sex acts.

Earlier this year, WND reported on a new campaign to rally parents against laws in 43 states that effectively protect **** in some education settings.

“Before today’s kindergarteners graduate from high school, around 4.5 million students in America will experience sexual abuse at the hands of a school employee,” campaign organizers said.

“Liberty Counsel discovered that the laws in 43 states have exemptions from obscenity laws that permit sexually explicit materials in schools that can facilitate this kind of misbehavior. These laws protect school employees who provide students with pornographic materials from criminal prosecution under the guise that the materials are ‘educational,'” the group said.

Liberty Counsel has drawn up a template to be used for states to fix their laws.

“It is ridiculous to claim that legally harmful, pornographic material magically becomes innocent because the person providing it changed jobs,” said Mat Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel. “It is time to hold our teachers and coaches to the same legal standards as all other adults. From Hollywood to hometown America, children deserve to be protected from harmful materials, grooming and ****.”


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on May 24, 2018, 02:39:03 am
The Movie "Show Dogs" Contains Scenes That "Groom Children for Sexual Abuse"

The PG movie Show Dogs contains scenes of “unwanted genital touching” on a talking dog who is told to “go to a zen place”.

Show Dogs is a family comedy about the unlikely pairing of a human detective (voiced by Will Arnett) and his partner Max (voiced by Ludacris), a talking dog who goes undercover at a dog show to solve a case.

As if this premise wasn’t horrible enough, the movie contains bizarre scenes where the dog protagonist has to allow a stranger to grope his genitals in order to complete his mission. According to the National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE) these scenes send “a troubling message that grooms children for sexual abuse”.

Blogger Terina Maldonado describes the problematic scenes:

    “As part of any dog show, contestants are judged on their abilities and physical attributes. One part, in particular, is the inspection of the dog’s private parts. Because Max is new to the competition, he also is new to the inspection of a dog’s private parts.

    Since the inspection of the private parts will happen in the finals, Frank touches Max’s private parts to get him use to it. Of course, Max doesn’t like it and snaps at Frank for him to stop. Max is then told by the former champion, who has been through the process before, that he needs to go to his ‘zen place’ while it happens so he can get through it. More attempts are made by Frank to touch Max’s private parts, but Max is still having trouble letting it happen and keeps snapping at him.

    The day of the finals come and if Max doesn’t let his private parts be touched, he may lose the competition and any hope of finding the kidnapped panda. It all rests on his ability to let someone touch his private parts. The judge’s hands slowly reach behind Max and he goes to his ‘zen place,’ He’s flying through the sky, dancing with his partner, there are fireworks and flowers-everything is great-all while someone is touching his private parts.”

The “zen place” scene – where Max dances in the sky while he’s being groped – alludes to dissociation. Some of the most sadistic practices known to man (notably Monarch Programming) involve subjecting children to trauma in order to cause dissociation, rendering them extremely vulnerable and suggestible. These scenes appear to normalize this horrific process used by child abusers.

Dawn Hawkins, the executive director of the NCOSE stated that her organization objects to “multiple scenes where a dog character must have its private parts inspected, in the course of which the dog is uncomfortable and wants to stop but is told to go to a ‘zen place’.”

The NCOSE statement also adds:

    “The dog is rewarded with advancing to the final round of the dog show after passing this barrier. Disturbingly, these are similar tactics child abusers use when grooming children: telling them to pretend they are somewhere else and that they will get a reward for withstanding their discomfort.

    Children’s movies must be held to a higher standard, and must teach children bodily autonomy, the ability to say ‘no’ and safety – not confusing messages endorsing unwanted genital touching.”

The NCOSE asked the production company Global Road Entertainment to edit out the problematic scenes. In a statement to CNN, the company defended the movie:

    “The dog show judging in this film is depicted completely accurately as done at shows around the world, and was performed by professional and highly respected dog show judges. Global Road Entertainment and the film-makers are saddened and apologize to any parent who feels the scene sends a message other than a comedic moment in the film, with no hidden or ulterior meaning, but respect their right to react to any piece of content.”

Although it is technically correct that dogs have their genitals inspected in actual dog shows, Show Dogs was never meant to be a fully accurate documentary about the world of dog shows. It is a children’s movie featuring a talking dog who feels human emotions. The viewers are meant to identify with the protagonist and this protagonist apparently needs to be groped in order to resolve the story.

Max Botkin, one of the chief writers of the movie, denied writing any of these scenes, claiming that the movie was “heavily rewritten by 13 other writers”, 12 of whom are uncredited. He added that he “didn’t get to see the film until it was in its final stage of completion and had zero say in creative choices”.

In a statement Botkin wrote:

    “I absolutely condemn any suggestion or act of non-consensual touching in any form, as well as disassociation as a coping mechanism for abuse of any kind. I understand and EMPATHIZE with the parents’ and groups’ concerns regarding the message the movie may impart.”

Some critics brushed over the controversy, believing that the movie was meant to entertain children who love potty jokes.

    “Max’s transformation necessitates getting his rear end waxed and learning to stay completely still when his private parts are inspected.

    Along with a blast of canine flatulence, those bits are aimed squarely at preschool viewers who still think bathroom and crotch jokes are the apex of hilarity”.
    – Variety, Film Review: ‘Show Dogs’

These scenes could indeed be interpreted as nothing more than innocent potty jokes. However, there is one unavoidable fact that we must consider: Hollywood is infested with child predators who actively seek out vulnerable children in order to groom them for systematic abuse. The documentary An Open Secret explains this disgusting process in great detail (watch it here). Knowing this fact, it is difficult not to be troubled by this Hollywood movie turning a known grooming process into a joke.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on June 07, 2018, 12:35:39 am
It spreads: Libraries push cross-dressing on young kids

Some libraries today have moved far beyond their historic purpose of being a resource for books, music, movies, maps and reference materials.

Now they’re pushing cross-dressing for children with their “Drag Story Hours.”

The state aim is to allow drag queens “to broadcast and share who we are with the world.”

Last year, the Michelle Obama Neighborhood Library in Long Beach, California, a public facility, presented to children in its young readers program a huge array of diversity and “inclusion” programs, including a visit by a drag queen named Xochi Mochi.

Mochi’s visit took place during the “Drag Queen Story Hour,” a collaboration between the Long Beach Public Library, the LGBTQ Center of Long Beach, the Genders and Sexualities Alliance Network and the LGBTQ nonprofit Imperial Court of Long Beach, according to the Long Beach Public Library’s calendar.

Now, Jon Miltimore at the Intellectual Takeout reports the St. Paul Public Library in Minnesota will host “Drag Story Hours.”

It will be open to children and adults.

Chad Kampe, who organizes “queer-friendly events” in Minnesota, explained: “Drag pushes people to break boundaries and explore creativity. At a very young age, we are taught to embrace our differences. Drag not only provides an opportunity to embrace who we are, it allows for us to broadcast and share who we are with the world.”

The library says it will livestream its three scheduled events, this month and next. The events will feature story-reading, songs and two activists who will “strut their stuff for an over-the-top story hour.”

Library officials explained, according to Takeout, that it’s part of an initiative that was launched last year to oppose President Trump.

The program, “We Belong Together,” targets Trump’s restrictions on people entering the United States from known terror-fomenting regions.

“A look at the ‘We Belong Together’ website shows a heavy emphasis on drag culture … a fact that reinforced some Minnesota parents’ concerns that local governments are attempting to indoctrinate children,” Miltimore reported.

He quoted one mother saying, “A very sad day has arrived when we are handing our children over with their innocence and their pure minds and filling them with such confusion.”


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on June 07, 2018, 04:38:19 am
Candidate for Congress wants to legalize incest

A Northern Virginia candidate running for Congress has some shocking, and dangerous views about children and women.

Nathan Larson, an accountant who lives in Fauquier County, thinks it's okay for adults to have sex with children. He is running as an Independent for Virginia's 10 Congressional District.

And he wants to make it legal.

Normally, WUSA9 doesn't give people with abhorrent beliefs a platform to share those ideas. But in this case, since Nathan Larson is running for Congress, we would like people to know why he's running for Congress.

He says he wants to "restore liberty" and legalize incest for "personal freedom."

He said he thinks "the state should not interfere with people's decisions. Like if people were to say, well, the genetic quality might not be as good if people inbreed, they could say the same thing about a lot of people who have bad genetics who should be passing on. These days there's a lot of genetics tests. We can tell what kind of things people have."

What about the children's rights? Children cannot consent to sex with an adult.

Larson said: "Well, like with girls, I just believe that it should be for fathers to make those decisions. I believe in the patriarchal order."

Larson has a daughter from his previous marriage, but lost custody of her. He said he never had sex with his daughter but wants to. He said she lives in Colorado.

He says he doesn't find anything wrong with that. "It's not for me to intrude on another family and tell them what they should do."

Larson could not understand how incest, or raping children, could be harmful to them.

"The law doesn't treat them as having the full rights as adults," he said.

Larson also said that wives should not be allowed to accuse their husbands of ****.

The Virginia Board of Elections says Larson is not officially a candidate, because candidates running as independents cannot be listed until June 12 which is Primary Day. But, Larson says he gathered the required 1,000 signatures and filed the paperwork.

Even though he lives in Catlett of Fauquier County, he's not filing his own Congressional District, but Congressional District 10, which is currently held by Republican Barbara Comstock.

Larson ran for a state delegate seat in Prince William County last year after he spent 16 months in prison for threatening to kill President Obama.

In response to this story, Lauren Book, a victim of childhood sexual abuse, and the Founder and CEO of Lauren's Kids sent this statement:

Virginia congressional candidate Nathan Larson’s repugnant platform glorifies ****, pedophilia and anti-Semitism.

This week, the Huffington Post published an article about Nathan Larson, a Virginia accountant running for Congress who shockingly “admits he’s a ****.”

This abomination of a human being advocates for sexually assaulting infants and children, raping women (including your spouse), and identifies Adolph Hitler as a hero. Larson is a sick, depraved individual who spreads his hate through now defunct websites. He is a maestro at creating safe havens for other dangerous deviants who openly compare notes on sex acts with children and how-to pieces on the entitlement for ****.

Larson is a predator who should be locked up — not elected to high office. The overt and cavalier boasting of violence should sound an alarm that he is a threat to humanity. Every 98 seconds, someone in the United States will become a victim of sexual assault. Child sexual abuse is a trauma experienced by an estimated 42 million people in America, and the number grows daily. Sexual violence shatters lives and leaves victims to heal through life-long emotional, physical, and financial consequences. To have a congressional candidate actively and openly support and practice these assaults is an insult to the kinds of values America stands for.

As a society, as Americans, and as human beings, we must do more to push back the darkness and horror that robs millions of their quality of life. That begins with condemning Nathan Larson.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on June 11, 2018, 07:13:09 pm
Netflix to launch LGBT cartoon about drag queen superheroes who ‘save the world’ from ‘evil’

Netflix has released a brief preview for a cross-dressing themed superhero cartoon. It will debut later this year on the popular streaming platform.

“During the day, they work in a department store and deal with their uptight bitchy boss,” reads the official synopsis for “Super Drags,” the upcoming show. “By night, they tighten up their corsets and transform into the baddest SUPER DRAGS in town, ready to combat shade and rescue the world's glitter from the evil villains. Get ready, because the SUPER DRAGS are going deeper than you think.”

The 38-second trailer (content advisory for suggestive imagery) offers few details, but depicts the stylized lead characters suiting up, with the camera focusing on their chests and behinds. The only dialogue is a decidedly-male “huh?” coming from a character in a green dress, blonde wig, and heavy eyeliner and lipstick.

The five-episode series is the brainchild of Anderson Mahanski, Fernando Mendonça, and Paulo Lescaut of Brazilian animation studio Combo Studios, the Brazilian website CosmoNerd reports.

“We are thrilled that our first Brazilian animation will present our audiences with the daring, scandalous and fabulous world of Super Drags!” Netflix director of original international content Chris Sanagustin said according to Animation Magazine. “Netflix is fortunate to invest in great animation talent from Brazil, bringing the vibrant trait of Combo and the acidic mood of our producers to the beautiful and the canvases from every corner.”

“Thanks to Netflix we can take the Brazilian animation and mainly the LGBTQ representativeness to the 190 countries that have access to the service,” the show’s executive producer Marcelo Pereira added.

In a similar yet more extreme vein, a cartoon called “Drag Tots,” about baby drag queens and featuring the voice of drag icon RuPaul, is in the works for RuPaul’s LGBT streaming service WOW Presents Plus.

There’s no word yet on an age rating or target audience for “Super Drags.” Netflix features a number of adult cartoons such as “Big Mouth,” which has come under fire for featuring graphic depictions of pubescent characters exploring their sexual curiosity.

But while “Big Mouth” and others carry a TV-MA rating, and Netflix’s parental controls allow parents to limit the content their kids can access by rating, the company also promotes vulgar sexual messages via “Bill Nye Saves the World,” which it suggests is acceptable for children as young as middle school via its TV-14 rating.

Regardless of such concerns, pro-LGBT advocates are embracing the cartoon.

“Our bodies are ready” for “Super Drags,” Pride.com’s Taylor Henderson writes. “I am SHAKING,” PopSugar’s Ryan Roschke declares. The trailer “does not give much away,” Nick Duffy of PinkNews says, “but we are hyped.”

The show “looks to combine everything we love in this world,” SyFy channel blogger Courtney Enlow writes. “This is truly a perfect gift to kick off Pride month.”


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on June 12, 2018, 06:22:37 pm
Library System Hosting 'Over-the-Top' Story Hour With Men, Women 'Strutting Their Stuff' in Drag

A library system in Minnesota is raising concern as it recently announced that it will be hosting three “over-the-top” drag story hours in June and July, billing the event as being geared toward families and suitable for babies, toddlers, preschoolers and teens.

“Come meet some fabulous drag queens and kings at the library! They will read stories, sing songs, and strut their stuff for an over-the-top story hour. All ages welcome,” a press release from the Saint Paul Public Library system reads.

The events coincide with homosexual and transgender pride month, and is being held in conjunction with the organization Flip Phone, which features a number of risque photos on its social media pages. The story hours are stated to feature two drag performers each, which include women dressed as men, also known as “drag kings,” at some events.

“Drag pushes people to break boundaries and explore creativity,” remarked Flip Phone Founder Chad Kampe. “At a very young age, we are taught to embrace our differences. Drag not only provides an opportunity to embrace who we are, it allows for us to broadcast and share who we are with the world.”

The first event was held on Monday evening at the Rondo Community Library and featured drag performers Utica and Sasha Cassadine, who read stories, sang songs, and danced with the children in attendance. One of the stories read was “Julian Is a Mermaid,” a book about a boy who wants to dress up like a mermaid after seeing three women do so.

The children also gathered around one of the men dressed in drag for a group photo.

The story hour is additionally scheduled to be held on June 16 at the Riverview location and on July 11 at the George Latimer Central Library. The Saint Paul library system has further created a page on its website that includes recommended books, movies and online resources as a “primer to drag culture,” such as the movie “Kinky Boots,” “RuPaul’s Drag Race” and the book “Does This Book Make My Butt Look Big?”

It also features recommended homosexual and transgender themed books that the library finds suitable for children ages 0-6, such as “Daddy, Papa and Me,” “I Am Jazz,” “My Two Moms,” and “Worm Loves Worm.”

Some local residents and others have expressed concern about the story hour, writing messages of opposition on the system’s social media pages.

“I would sue your library if I ever walked in with my children and they seen such disgusting things. This is shameful. This is sick!” one commenter wrote.

“I want my tax dollars back,” another stated.

Flip Phone had stated that the library was being “mega-trolled,” but most remarks of opposition are no longer viewable. It is unclear as to whether or not they were deleted by library staff.

“This agenda is just coming on so strong,” one mother told the outlet Intellectual Takeout. “A very sad day has arrived when we are handing our children over with their innocence and their pure minds and filling them with such confusion.”

American statesman Daniel Webster once warned, “If the power of the gospel is not felt throughout the length and breadth of the land, anarchy and misrule, degradation and misery, corruption and darkness will reign without mitigation or end.”


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on July 10, 2018, 06:41:09 pm
Pedophiles Are Now Calling Themselves 'Minor Attracted Persons' And Want Inclusion In LGBTQ Movement

Pedophiles are rebranding themselves as ‘MAPs’ or ‘Minor Attracted Persons’ in an effort to gain acceptance and be included into the LGBT community

For years now, we’ve been telling you that eventually the ever-growing alphabet soup that is the LGBTQ Movement would, at some point, have to add a ‘P’ to their acronym. The letter ‘P’ of course standing for ****. Why is this inevitable? Because of their motto, ‘all love is love‘. The word of God says otherwise.

“For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections…” Romans 1:26 (KJV)

FROM THE DAILY CALLER: Pedophiles are rebranding themselves as ‘MAPs’ or ‘Minor Attracted Persons‘ in an effort to gain acceptance and be included into the LGBTQ community. According to Urban Dictionary, the blanket term MAP includes infantophilia (infants), pedophiles (prepubescent children), hebephiles (pubescent children), and ephebophiles (post-pubescent children). Some MAPs also refer to themselves as NOMAPs or “Non-Offending Minor Attracted Persons”. These pedophiles seek to be a part of the LGBTQ+ community, even going so far as to make a “Pride” flag for Gay Pride Month. The “MAP/NOMAP community” tries to pull at people’s heartstrings by claiming that pedophiles are misunderstood marginalized people, and that as long as their attraction to children is not acted upon —  or in some cases when they get permission from the child — that they should not be villainized. Sites such as “The Prevention Project” claim to be aimed at helping children, posting quotes like the one below, reminiscent of testimonials of struggling gay youth, under headlines like “everyone needs support”. READ MORE

We live in a time where, if you read and believe your Bible, it is by turns both frightening and comforting. Frightening because prophecy related to the rising wickedness of the end times is coming true before our eyes, and comforting because the Bible is true and trustworthy.
If you see this flag flying anywhere online, you are looking at a ****

When I was a child, men who wanted to dress up as women were treated rightfully as someone who had either an extreme fetish or mental illness. It was not presented as something that was anything remotely close to normal. The character of Klinger from the 1970’s M*A*S*H television show kept trying to be discharged from the army on a Section 8, which is a discharge related to mental illness. How did he angle that? By dressing up in women’s clothing.

Flash forward to 2018 where the United States Military is paying for transsexuals to have ‘gender switching’ surgery, courtesy of the American taxpayer. For those of you not paying attention to the world around you, that is an unprecedented paradigm shift. What was deemed a mental illness just one generation ago has somehow become a ‘protected right’. In Canada right now, with the passage of Bill C-16, jail time awaits for anyone who intentionally calls a trans person by the wrong pronoun.
It’s not an accident or coincidence that the Catholic Church is in the process of bringing the LGBTQ in

The modern-day history of the Catholic Church is one of institutionalized pedophila, and spending millions to keep it quiet. So is it any wonder that they are in the process of welcoming the LGBTQ, and soon the P, into the Catholic Church? All part of the end times plan.

FROM THE US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE: Effective immediately, transgender Service members may serve openly, and they can no longer be discharged or otherwise separated from the military solely for being transgender individuals. READ MORE

“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” Isaiah 5:20 (KJV)

The Bible says that in the time of Jacob’s trouble, global wickedness will rise to a level previously unimaginable, as Antichrist implements his dark rule. The Pretribulation Rapture will remove the Church before that takes place, but in the meantime we are seeing the ever-quickening pace of the shift towards calling evil good and good evil. The term ‘minor attracted persons’ sounds so much better than what it really is, ****, doesn’t it? And that’s the whole point.

If the Pretribulation Rapture doesn’t happen soon, and barring serious illness or accident, you will live to see the day where pedophiles become a protected class of people with their own special pronoun. And if you dare call them by the wrong name or dare to say what they are doing is wrong, you will be the one who will be punished. I believe with all my heart that if Hillary had won the election instead of Trump, pedophiles would already be included in the LGBTQ.

Don’t think it can happen, you say? We will never fall that far, you say? Open your eyes, we are already there. Open your King James Bible and see for yourself. You’ve been warned.

“He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.” Revelation 22:20 (KJV)


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on July 13, 2018, 07:07:43 pm
Pedophilia Included As ‘Sexual Orientation’ On New LGBT Pride Flag

Pedophiles are attempting to rebrand themselves as “MAPs” or “Minor Attracted Persons” in an effort to normalize pedophilia and gain acceptance in mainstream America by being included as part of the expanding LGBT+ community umbrella.



PSA TO MINORS: IF YOU SEE THIS “””PRIDE””” FLAG ANYWHERE BE WARNED this flag is for MAPs, which stands for minor attracted person(s) THIS IS A FLAG FOR PEDOPHILES


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on August 14, 2018, 06:01:07 pm
This TEDx Talk Attempts to Normalize Pedophilia

A TEDx talk held in May argued that “pedophilia is an unchangeable orientation” in a bizarre attempt to rationalize and normalize this abomination.

On May 5th 2018, a TEDx event entitled “Future of Societys” was held at the University of Würzburg in Germany and featured a lecture by medical student Mirjam Heine on the subject of “Why our perception of pedophilia has to change”.

Heine began her talk with the story of Jonas, a 19-year-old Munich law student who is sexually attracted to girls aged 6 to 12 years old. She goes on to describe pedophilia as an “unchangeable orientation” (the American Psychiatric Association classifies it as a disorder).

Here’s a description of the event on the TEDx website:

    Mirjam Heine

    Medical Student

    One to two percent of the main male population is considered as pedophiles. This means worldwide more than 57 million people. Therefore, pedophilia is not an irrelevant phenomenon we can ignore. It is unrelated to class status and educational level. The medical student Mirjam Heine explains how an appropriate approach to the unchangeable sexual orientation pedophilia might look like. She is mainly guided by the works of Prof Dr. Dr. Beier, the head of the institute for sexology and sexual medicine at the University Hospital Berlin and the prevention network “Kein Täter Werden” (meaning “don’t offend”). Hence, she also believes that no one is responsible for their sexual orientation, for their feelings, but that everyone is responsible for acting upon this sexual orientation. She also inquires how all of us can gain if we distinguish clearly between our feelings and our actions. Since pedophiles can’t change their sexual desires, they must learn to control them to not act upon them.

This is the header image of the TED website:
Are these ideas truly worth spreading? Here’s the video.

The talk contained lots of bizarre attempts at rationalization and mental gymnastics.

    “Let me very clear here. Abusing children is wrong without any doubt. But a **** who doesn’t abuse children has done nothing wrong.”

What about those who download gigabytes of pictures and videos of children being subjected to horrific abuse? Those who encourage these gigantic networks of media sharing and those who produce them?

Then, she equates “child love” to a sexual orientation and compares it to heterosexuality.

    “I want to quickly summarize where we are at the moment. According to current research, pedophilia is an unchangeable sexual orientation, just like for example heterosexuality. No one chooses to be a ****. No one can cease being one. The difference between pedophilia and other sexual orientations is that living out this sexual orientation will end in a disaster.”

A big part of Heine’s argumentation is that we, as a society must to stop judging pedophiles because it prevents them from getting help. She then adds that:

    “For example, they can’t tell their friends that they can’t go the beach because children will be there as well.”

How messed up is this sentence? If we follow her own logic, heterosexuals can’t go to the beach either because there might people of the opposite sex as well.

Heine then goes on depicting pedophiles as victims that should be “treated with respect”. She concludes that, in order to prevent child abuse, we must accept pedophiles as they are and encourage them to get help.

Needless to say, this presentation caused a great deal of backlash and controversy, which lead to the TED organization to release a statement dissociating itself from the event.

    An independently organized TEDx event recently posted, and subsequently removed, a talk from the TEDx YouTube channel that the event organizer titled: “Why our perception of pedophilia has to change.”

    In the TEDx talk, a speaker described pedophilia as a condition some people are born with, and suggested that if we recognize it as such, we can do more to prevent those people from acting on their instincts.

    TEDx events are organized independently from the main annual TED conference, with some 3,500 events held every year in more than 100 countries. Our nonprofit TED organization does not control TEDx events’ content.

    This talk and its removal was recently brought to our attention. After reviewing the talk, we believe it cites research in ways that are open to serious misinterpretation. This led some viewers to interpret the talk as an argument in favor of an illegal and harmful practice.

    Furthermore, after contacting the organizer to understand why it had been taken down, we learned that the speaker herself requested it be removed from the internet because she had serious concerns about her own safety in its wake.

    Our policy is and always has been to remove speakers’ talks when they request we do so. That is why we support this TEDx organizer’s decision to respect this speaker’s wishes and keep the talk offline.

    We will continue to take down any illegal copies of the talk posted on the Internet.

However, it is not the first time a TEDx event sends out this message of “tolerance”. On April 18th 2018, the event TEDxSittardGeleen hosted in the Netherlands (with theme “Misbehaving Beautifully”) featured psychologist and criminologist Madeleiene van der Bruggen who asked society to be “be mature about pedophilia”.

The description of the video (which is still online) states:

    0.5 up to 3% of our male population has some pedophilic interest. That means that everybody probably knows a person with pedophilic interests. According to Madeleine van der Bruggen, most people don’t act out on it, because they know that it’s illegal. And although they never act out on it, they will also never ever be able to talk about it to anyone. But sometimes they do. Without justifying this, it seems a logical thing to happen. Madeleine argues that this is a public and mental health issue. A shared responsibility for all of us. Let’s acknowledge this problem exists and stop with hate and throwing rocks at offenders’ houses. That is not going to solve this problem! Let’s be a mature society and agree that only when we are open about this topic, people will find the strength to come forward, so we as a society can help.

Under the guise of “protecting children”, the speaker calls, once again, for the acceptance of pedophiles. Once again, the speaker compares the number of potential pedophiles to a large city and adds that it could be your “neighbor, colleague, or even your husband”. She then explains how difficult it must be for these people to never find the love they long for. And, to make it clear, that “love” they long for is towards children who are not physically and psychologically developed to be in “complete” relationships.

There is an agenda creeping through media and it is about normalizing pedophilia. We are witnessing the first steps. The first lines being are crossed as vocabulary changes from “horrific abomination” to “sexual orientation” and from “sex offender” to “your neighbor”. First, they will claim that we should accept them in order to “help” them. Then they will require “rights”. Who knows where that could lead.

Yes, these people should not act out on their desires and they should actively seek help – no matter how radical it is. However, don’t ask for regular people to accept those who lust over their children. I mean, seriously? To be sexually attracted to the purity and innocence of children reflects a sick and twisted state of mind. It is not “normal”. It is the opposite of normal. It is an abomination and an embodiment of pure evil … and that is why those in power are slowly yet steadily pushing for its “acceptance”.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on March 08, 2019, 04:07:01 am
Pedophiles Demand to be Part of LGBT Community, Call for ‘Normalization’

Pedophiles are now attempting to ‘rebrand’ themselves as ‘MAP’ (Minor-Attracted Persons) in a strange effort to be accepted into the LGBT community by ‘normalizing’ pedophilia.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on May 06, 2019, 04:30:59 am
Pedophilia Being Taught As “Sexual Orientation” in California Schools - Stillness in the Storm

Government school officials in California think it is “really important” to teach children about pedophilia and pederasty in the classroom because it is a “sexual orientation.”

That is according to a top official for California’s Brea Olinda School District, who admitted to parents that it was being done — and that it would continue, despite the outrage. The implications are mind-blowing.

The stunning admission came after a parent-information meeting last month for the Brea Olinda Unified School District (BOUSD).

Stephanie Yates, founder of Informed Parents of California, asked school officials why they were “teaching pedophilia in school to 9th graders.”

But instead of a denial that such an atrocity was taking place, a top school official confirmed it was happening and acted like there was nothing wrong with it.

“This is done because we are talking about historical perspectives of how gender relations and different types of sexual orientations have existed in history,” said BOUSD Assistant Superintendent of Curricula Kerrie Torres in a matter-of-fact way, sounding almost oblivious to how the bombshell might sound to normal people.

 Horrified, the mother turned activist expressed shock at Torres’ admission. “So sex between a man and a boy is a sexual orientation?” she asked.

Torres did not deny it. “It’s something that occurred in history, and so this is really important for us to include,” the assistant superintendent said, implying that yes, sexual relations between a man and a boy — properly considered **** under the laws of every state — is a “sexual orientation.”

Of course, if simply having “occurred in history” means something merits inclusion in school curricula, then one might ask why the birth, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ or the full text of the Mayflower Compact are never mentioned in government schools.

Obviously, there is more to the story than simply having to teach children about such perversions merely because they “occurred.”

Indeed, the comments may be one of the most shocking admissions from an education official in recent memory. And the implications go even beyond simply normalizing one of the most disgusting and abominable crimes that can be perpetrated.

Consider: With “sexual orientation” increasingly becoming a legally protected category across almost half of the states already — with Congress working on it too — the implications of defining pedophilia and pederasty as such are hard to overstate.

For instance, in California, “discrimination” based on “sexual orientation” is prohibited. If pedophiles simply have a different “sexual orientation,” does that mean schools are required to hire them?

Establishment propaganda outlets disguised as news organizations such as Salon and Slate have also been working to normalize and redefine pedophilia and pederasty as a “sexual orientation.”

LGBT movement hero Harvey Milk, who is celebrated in California’s fake “history” textbooks as a great figure, was known for raping minor boys, at least one of whom later committed suicide. There seems to be a trend here in California.

There was a time when exposing children to far more mild obscenities was a crime. Now it is considered “education.”

Informed Parents of California has waged a noble battle to expose the perversion and evil that is being forced on the state’s children. However, that is not enough.

Parents who love their children must protect them from this evil now — and that means getting them out!


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on July 30, 2019, 07:24:36 am
Amazon openly sells pedophilia products while banning books that try to help people overcome unwanted same-sex attraction

At the same time that Amazon continues to sell child sex dolls to **** perverts, the Jeff Bezos retail empire is reportedly pulling all “conversion therapy” books from its website because they’re apparently “offensive” to leftists.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on September 12, 2019, 06:32:54 am
BBC Video Tells Children: There Are More Than 100 ‘Gender Identities’

A BBC resource for children ages nine to twelve claims there are over 100 “gender identities” – something that is “really exciting.”


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome
Post by: Mark on September 18, 2019, 12:24:50 pm
California College Normalizes Pedophilia as a “Sexual Orientation”

A college in California is teaching students that pedophilia could merely be considered to be an alternative “sexual orientation.”

“An actual topic we discussed in class today at a State University after watching an 8 minute Vice News video showcasing self identified pedophiles. This is going to be mainstreamed,” tweeted Alex Mazzara.

The photo shows a presentation slide entitled ‘Pedophilia as a Sexual Orientation’.

    An actual topic we discussed in class today at a State University after watching an 8 minute Vice News video showcasing self identified pedophiles. This is going to be mainstreamed. pic.twitter.com/y4WJATXz08

    — Alex (@alexjmazzara) September 13, 2019

It suggests that embracing pedophilia as an alternative sexual orientation could be part of the “acceptance of diverse sexual identities.”

The name of the college was not provided.

The VICE video showcasing pedophiles may well have been their platforming of Todd Nickerson, a self confessed ****.

VICE’s article about Nickerson sympathetically portrayed him, an individual who openly admits wanting to molest children, as a victim of right-wing “vigilantes”.

Conservatives have been warning for years that the ultimate endgame of every fetish, gender identity and sexuality being not merely tolerated but endorsed would eventually be the mainstreaming of pedophilia.

We are now not far away from that very eventuality.


Title: Re: The-Kinsey-Syndrome: Sexual Addiction WITHIN the Church
Post by: tennis shoe on September 12, 2020, 07:44:23 pm
65-72% men in church are addicts
50-58% pastors are addicts
25-30% women in church are addicts

90 days to stop behavior
2-5 years to rewire the brain

"Not about sex, it's about self-medicating" with money, sex, and power.
"Only Jesus Christ can deal with shame."
Time to "reclaim what hell stole from you".

Dr. Ted Roberts - Key Insights on Sex Addiction within the Church