OK, had a few moments to think about what she said - I only listened to parts 1 and 3, however, both listens were a good 90 or so minutes(pretty long). Here's a couple of things that I had gripes about what she said...
1) She did a good job exposing secret societies, however, she focused a tad bit too much on the Rosacruxions(sp), and really never said anything about the Vatican/RCC. The only time she mentioned the RCC is when she thought how the whole Hegelian Dialectic was played out by having the "Protestants" and "Catholics" on opposite sides, with the Protestants in particular being infiltrated by Rosacruxion agents.
Sure, this may be the case, however, again, the Vatican/RCC played a huge role persecuting Christians during the Dark Ages, and obviously they've continued to do so albeit in a different way. For someone like her who is KJV-only and has done alot of research into this stuff, you would think she should have at least some decent knowledge of the evils of the Vatican, especially during those times of the Protestant Reformation and King James. And she should also know very well that Freemasonry is a branch of the Jesuits/Vatican.
2) She pretty much agreed with David Bayes on the British Monarchy/America being the heads of the NWO, which was the exact same thing she tried to expose Bayes and the Rosacruxions of sending out disinfo over. Yeah, pretty much after she went through how Bayes used disinfo to make everyone believe the British Monarchy is the entity bringing out the NWO into Israel in the end times, she herself admitted toward the end of part 3 that the Antichrist will likely arise out of this same British Monarchy.
The thing to this British Monarchy angle came from the deception that Great Britain is the Headquarters of all secret societies in the world(according to her that is, is disinfo spread out, which is why I was surprised when she herself ended up actually agreeing with Bayes's position).
And to boot, she said the AC at the beginning of the 7 year trib will be a FAKE one, while the REAL one will show up at the midway point. Obviously, this is error on her part b/c Daniel 9:27 makes it crystal clear that the AC will make his appearance at the signing of the treaty in Israel, only for him to break it at the midway point.
Overall, despite these 2 gripes, I thought it was a decent interview, but really not worth it to listen to it entirely(each part is a good 90 minutes long, which is longer than the average Christian interview I listen to). Listening to part 1 itself should be enough(when she talks about the early history of King James et al).
If someone can answer my questions in the above post, I would be happy.
