Wiki says:
Tesla claimed to have worked on plans for a directed-energy weapon from the early 1900s until his death.[11][12] In 1937, at a luncheon in his honor concerning the death ray, Tesla stated, "But it is not an experiment... I have built, demonstrated and used it. Only a little time will pass before I can give it to the world."[2]
In 1937, Tesla wrote a treatise, "The Art of Projecting Concentrated Non-dispersive Energy through the Natural Media", concerning charged particle beam weapons.[13] Tesla published the document in an attempt to expound on the technical description of a "superweapon that would put an end to all war." This treatise is currently in the Nikola Tesla Museum archive in Belgrade. It describes an open-ended vacuum tube with a gas jet seal that allows particles to exit, a method of charging particles to millions of volts, and a method of creating and directing non-dispersive particle streams (through electrostatic repulsion).[13] Tesla tried to interest the US War Department,[14] England, the Soviet Union, and Yugoslavia in the device.[15]
During the period in which the negotiations were being carried on, Tesla claimed that efforts had been made to steal the invention. His room had been entered and his papers had been scrutinized, but the thieves, or spies, left empty-handed. He said that there was no danger that his invention could be stolen for he had at no time committed any part of it to paper. The blueprint for the teleforce weapon was all in his mind.[16]
'Death Ray' For Planes
The New York Times
September 22, 1940
Nikola Tesla, one of the truly great inventors who celebrated his eighty-fourth birthday on July, 10 tells the writer that he stands ready to divulge to the United States government the secret of his "teleforce," of which he said," airplane motors would be melted at a distance of 250 miles, so that an invisible 'Chinese Wall of Defense' would be built around the country against any enemy attack by an enemy air force, no matter how large.
This "teleforce" is based on an entirely new principle of physics, that "no one has ever dreamed about," different from the principles embodied in the in his inventions relating to the transmission of electrical power from a distance, for which he has received a number of basic patents. This new type of force Mr. Tesla said, would operate through a beam one- hundred-millionth of a square centimeter in diameter, and could be generated from special plant that would cost no more then $2,000,000 and would take only about three months to construct.
A dozen such plants, located at strategic points along the coast, according to Mr. Tesla, would be enough to defend the country against all aerial attack. The beam would melt any engine, whether diesel or gasoline driven, and would also ignite the explosives aboard any bomber. No possible defense against it could be devised, he asserts, as the beam would be all-penetrating.
More:
http://rense.com/general10/deathray.htmLooks like the deathray was a particle beam weapon that needed a medium as the “bullet”. In this case, it was tungsten pellets run through a rail-gun type accelerator.
Molecular disruption is different. It’s already in every microwave oven. Raytheon produced the Active Denial System for crowd control using this principle.
Still, all of these fall under the general category of directed energy weaponry.
That particular article attributes HAARP as causing entire islands to vanish off the map. It’s unclear as to what medium would be used, where it would come from, and how HAARP would concentrate and direct these particles. It also mixes teleforce, or particle beams, with plasma-based weaponry and microwave weaponry.
This statement from the article…
Recently, bizarre auroras and disturbances to landmasses have called attention to the possibility that elements of HAARP technology have been weaponized to adopt Tesla’s annihilating death ray that works with the propagation of focused radio frequencies to disrupt the bonds that keep molecules together using nonlinear effects of intense radiated power.
…seems to differ from what Tesla was saying about his own invention.