End Times and Current Events
November 28, 2021, 12:07:47 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome To End Times and Current Events.
 
  Home Help Search Gallery Staff List Login Register  

The Bizarro World of Liberalism

Shoutbox
August 08, 2018, 02:38:10 am suzytr says: Hello, any good churches in the Sacto, CA area, also looking in Reno NV, thanks in advance and God Bless you Smiley
January 29, 2018, 01:21:57 am Christian40 says: It will be interesting to see what happens this year Israel being 70 years as a modern nation may 14 2018
October 17, 2017, 01:25:20 am Christian40 says: It is good to type Mark is here again!  Smiley
October 16, 2017, 03:28:18 am Christian40 says: anyone else thinking that time is accelerating now? it seems im doing days in shorter time now is time being affected in some way?
September 24, 2017, 10:45:16 pm Psalm 51:17 says: The specific rule pertaining to the national anthem is found on pages A62-63 of the league rulebook. It states: “The National Anthem must be played prior to every NFL game, and all players must be on the sideline for the National Anthem. “During the National Anthem, players on the field and bench area should stand at attention, face the flag, hold helmets in their left hand, and refrain from talking. The home team should ensure that the American flag is in good condition. It should be pointed out to players and coaches that we continue to be judged by the public in this area of respect for the flag and our country. Failure to be on the field by the start of the National Anthem may result in discipline, such as fines, suspensions, and/or the forfeiture of draft choice(s) for violations of the above, including first offenses.”
September 20, 2017, 04:32:32 am Christian40 says: "The most popular Hepatitis B vaccine is nothing short of a witch’s brew including aluminum, formaldehyde, yeast, amino acids, and soy. Aluminum is a known neurotoxin that destroys cellular metabolism and function. Hundreds of studies link to the ravaging effects of aluminum. The other proteins and formaldehyde serve to activate the immune system and open up the blood-brain barrier. This is NOT a good thing."
http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-08-11-new-fda-approved-hepatitis-b-vaccine-found-to-increase-heart-attack-risk-by-700.html
September 19, 2017, 03:59:21 am Christian40 says: bbc international did a video about there street preaching they are good witnesses
September 14, 2017, 08:06:04 am Psalm 51:17 says: bro Mark Hunter on YT has some good, edifying stuff too.
September 14, 2017, 04:31:26 am Christian40 says: i have thought that i'm reaping from past sins then my life has been impacted in ways from having non believers in my ancestry.
September 11, 2017, 06:59:33 am Psalm 51:17 says: The law of reaping and sowing. It's amazing how God's mercy and longsuffering has hovered over America so long. (ie, the infrastructure is very bad here b/c for many years, they were grossly underspent on. 1st Tim 6:10, the god of materialism has its roots firmly in the West) And remember once upon a time ago when shacking up b/w straight couples drew shock awe?

Exodus 20:5  Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
View Shout History
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The Bizarro World of Liberalism  (Read 15484 times)
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #60 on: September 02, 2014, 06:19:25 am »

Politically Correct Liberals finally get a real wake up call to the world around them.

A CNN Host Let a Muslim Cleric Speak Freely. What He Said about Journalism, Terrorism and Sharia Law in America Left the Host Speechless

British Muslim activist Anjam Choudary appeared on CNN’s “Reliable Sources” Sunday morning, and while host Brian Stelter seemed as if he was working hard to give the cleric a fair shake, the veteran journalist couldn’t help but get exasperated as Choudary steadfastly defended his radical Islamic ideology — and joked about 9/11.

Besides saying that he thought he won his epic shouting match with Fox News’ Sean Hannity earlier in the week, Choudary refused to condemn the recent beheading of American journalist James Foley by the Islamic State.

Middle Eastern Muslims don’t see any difference between Western military members and civilians “because the general populace of America have re-voted for people like [President Barack] Obama and [former President George W.] Bush, who continue their policy of tyranny in the area,” Choudary claimed.

Journalists are “the propaganda machine of the Obama administration” in the eyes of Middle Eastern Muslims, Choudary added.

“That’s a crazy thing to say given that the only reason you know about the abuses of Abu Ghraib is because of American journalists,” Stelter interjected. “The only reason why you know about the abuses at Guantanamo Bay are because of American journalists.”

Choudary was outspoken about his beliefs: “I believe that Sharia is the best way of life, and one day it will come to America.”

Choudary argued that no true Muslim interprets the Quran differently from he, and said that so-called “moderate” Muslims are probably paid by Western governments to speak out against “radical” Islam.

“Give me a break, now you’re just making up stuff,” Stelter exclaimed in response.

Later, Stelter confronted Choudary about what the cleric had done during the show’s sound check.

Instead of counting to 10, as guests typically do during a sound check, Choudary rattled off terrorism dates, including 7/7 (the date of the 2005 London bombings) and 9/11.

Choudary didn’t apologize.

“If you had a sense of humor, maybe you would have laughed,” he told Stelter. “It’s not a big deal.”

Stelter seemed disbelieving as he ended the segment saying, “I have nothing more to say.”



http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/08/31/a-cnn-host-let-a-muslim-cleric-speak-freely-what-he-said-about-journalism-terrorism-and-sharia-law-in-america-left-the-host-speechless/

I would really love to see all the lying journalists that keep saying Islam is a religion of peace go over and tell that to the real Muslims...
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #61 on: September 14, 2014, 10:31:00 am »

Building Legacy, Obama Reshapes Appellate Bench

Democrats have reversed the partisan imbalance on the federal appeals courts that long favored conservatives, a little-noticed shift with far-reaching consequences for the law and President Obama’s legacy.

For the first time in more than a decade, judges appointed by Democratic presidents considerably outnumber judges appointed by Republican presidents. The Democrats’ advantage has only grown since late last year when they stripped Republicans of their ability to filibuster the president’s nominees.

Democratic appointees who hear cases full time now hold a majority of seats on nine of the 13 United States Courts of Appeals. When Mr. Obama took office, only one of those courts had more full-time judges nominated by a Democrat.

The shift, one of the most significant but unheralded accomplishments of the Obama era, is likely to have ramifications for how the courts decide the legality of some of the president’s most controversial actions on health care, immigration and clean air. Since today’s Congress has been a graveyard for legislative accomplishment, these judicial confirmations are likely to be among its most enduring acts.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/14/us/politics/building-legacy-obama-reshapes-appellate-bench.html?src=twr&_r=0
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #62 on: September 14, 2014, 08:26:28 pm »

Quote
The shift, one of the most significant but unheralded accomplishments of the Obama era, is likely to have ramifications for how the courts decide the legality of some of the president’s most controversial actions on health care, immigration and clean air. Since today’s Congress has been a graveyard for legislative accomplishment, these judicial confirmations are likely to be among its most enduring acts.

And the sodomy and abortion issues as well.

Reagan/Bushes justices have been just as liberal - but either way, these Appellate courts have gone from liberal to super liberal now(as this Hegelian Dialectic game seems to be coming to a close now). And don't be surprised if the midterm elections produce big Dem gains(not that it matters one way or another, but again, this Hegelian Dialectic game is coming to a close now, it seems).
Report Spam   Logged
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #63 on: October 15, 2014, 08:27:44 pm »

The only reason this is news is that it is a truthful statement as to how LIBERALS/DEMOCRATS actually see and use the Black population. The Libs at YAHOO are doing the liberal tradition of CHARACTER ASSASSINATION instead of trying to counter the truth, you see this every time in creation/eviloution debates.  This is 100% true and has been since the 1920's. Want proof? Go here and research it. http://blackgenocide.org/home.html

Fox News host makes extremely racist comment about the Democratic party

Fox news contributor and guest host Stacey Dash says that the Democratic party has a "plantation mentality."

With the 2014 midterm elections less than two weeks away, the news media is pushing hard to appeal to their viewing base in an attempt to get out the vote. On Fox News Tuesday night, one comment might have gone too far.

Despite the crisis with ISIS and the fear of a potential Ebola outbreak on the minds of the American people, the economy is still a major issue. Though the economy has made improvements since the financial crisis of 2008, too many people are still struggling to keep their heads above water. One area where Republicans and Democrats don't see eye to eye is on the social safety net. When it comes to social service programs like welfare, food stamps and unemployment befits, Democrats have supported strengthening these programs, while Republicans have pushed to eliminate them or put them in the hands of the private sector.

On the October 14 edition of "Hannity" on Fox News, the discussion of Democrats and social welfare programs dominated the conversation. Host Sean Hannity spoke with Fox News contributor and often fill in host, Stacey Dash. Asked if voting for Barack Obama and the Democrats have helped the minority community, Dash answered with a quick "no, not at all." "It still keeps them stuck. They are getting money for free. They feel worthless. They are uneducated," Dash said of minority neighborhoods. "I mean, as long as you are that way, they (Democrats) can keep you under their control," Dash noted.

Hannity attempted to clarify Dash's remarks and asked her if she felt like the Democratic party created a sense of dependency. Dash responded that Democrats have a "plantation mentality" and think that if they keep giving services and money to low income voters, they won't want to think for themselves.

Stacey Dash, the actress and star of the hit film "Clueless," has been employed by Fox News for less than six months, but this isn't the first time that she has made controversial remarks. Earlier this week, Dash suggested that each city in America set up Ebola "quarantine" centers to hold patients who could be at risk for virus.

http://www.examiner.com/article/fox-news-host-makes-extremely-racist-comment-about-the-democratic-party
« Last Edit: October 15, 2014, 08:29:18 pm by Mark » Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #64 on: October 27, 2014, 03:31:50 pm »

Anti-Gun State Senator Arrested In Ferguson Protest Carrying 9mm
Police say she smelled of intoxicants, was carrying extra rounds


Missouri State Senator Jamilah Nasheed was arrested last week during a protest held in front of the Ferguson Police Department. Police claim she smelled of “intoxicants,” but Nasheed refused the breathalyzer. Perhaps the most interesting detail was that the state senator, who has sponsored several anti-gun bills, was found carrying a loaded 9mm and extra rounds.

News 4 reports:

    Missouri State Senator Jamilah Nasheed had a gun in her possession at the time she was arrested Monday night outside the Ferguson Police Department, according to Ferguson Police Chief Tom Jackson.

    Nasheed declined comment about the having the weapon, but did tell News 4 she has a concealed carry permit. A Ferguson police officer said Nasheed was carrying a fully-loaded 9mm handgun and additional rounds of ammunition.

    Sources also told News 4 Ferguson police requested St. Ann to administer a breathalyzer test at the time of her arrest because she "smelled strongly of intoxicants," but, despite originally agreeing to the test, later refused to do so. Nasheed said Tuesday she was not intoxicated at the time.

    An arrest report, obtained by News 4 Wednesday, states "observation of Nasheed noted that she appeared to be intoxicated while parts of her speech was incoherent and slurred."  The arresting officer went on to say "several officers...smelled the odor of alcohol emitting from her breath and person of Nasheed."

Nasheed, along with other protestors, was charged with "Failure to Obey Lawful Order of Police and Manner of Walking."

"Sometimes you have to break the law," said Nasheed. "Civil disobedience is breaking the law." The arrest, she explained, was supposed to be a symbolic act showing “we can protest peacefully and must protest peacefully” and a means of declaring that they “want justice for Michael Brown."

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/anti-gun-state-senator-arrested-ferguson-protest-carrying-9mm

Just Guess What Ferguson Police Found on Missouri Democrat Who Has Sponsored Several ‘Anti-Gun’ Bills…

Missouri state Senator Jamilah Nasheed, a Democrat who has sponsored several “anti-gun” bills in her state, was arrested Monday night during a protest outside of the Ferguson Police Department. However, it’s what police officers found on her that is raising eyebrows.

Nasheed was carrying a loaded 9mm handgun and extra rounds of ammunition, according to Ferguson Police Chief Tom Jackson. She also refused to take a breathalyzer test after officers determined she “smelled strongly of intoxicants,” sources told KMOV-TV.

Nasheed claimed on Tuesday that she was not intoxicated at the time of her arrest and emphasized that she is a legal concealed carry permit holder.

Police arrested and charged the state senator with failure to obey lawful order of police and manner of walking in the roadway after she and other protesters refused to get out of the street.

On Tuesday morning, Nasheed said it was a “symbolic arrest” to send a “message to the protesters that we can protest peacefully and that we must protest peacefully and that we want justice for Michael Brown.”

The National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action has dubbed several pieces of legislation sponsored by Nasheed “anti-gun,” including an amendment that would require gun owners to report a firearm stolen within 72 hours.

Nasheed also reportedly pushed for a bill that would have required any “parent or guardian of a child who attends a public, private, or charter school shall notify, in writing, the superintendent of the school district, or the governing body of a private school or charter school, that such parent or guardian owns a firearm within thirty calendar days” of enrollment.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/10/21/just-guess-what-ferguson-police-found-on-missouri-democrat-who-has-sponsored-several-anti-gun-bills/
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #65 on: November 05, 2014, 08:54:34 am »

This is how LIBERALS view the black race in Amerika...


Michelle To Black Voters: Vote Democrat Then 'Eat Some Fried Chicken'
"I give everyone full permission to eat some fried chicken after they vote…"


In an interview with Roland Martin for NewsOne: For Black America, Michelle Obama told black voters that that if they went out and voted Democrat, she gave them “full permission” to go “eat some fried chicken.”

Martin began the interview by calling Michelle the "Campaigner-in-Chief," adding that he thinks she's better on the campaign trail than her husband. Michelle discussed the importance of electing the right "team" for her husband to work with to accomplish his agenda—though she also stressed that this election "isn't about Barack" but "about you."

After she wrapped up most of her talking points, Martin asked her if Democrats successfully got "souls to the polls," could they celebrate with some “soul food.”

    Michelle: Absolutely. I give everyone full permission to eat some fried chicken after they vote. Only after, if you haven’t voted… You make a good point. Because I am, I do talk about health. But I think that a good victory for Democrats on Tuesday, you know, should be rewarded with some fried chicken.

The fried chicken comments begin at around the 7:15 mark. 

video: http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/michelle-black-voters-vote-democrat-then-eat-some-fried-chicken
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #66 on: November 05, 2014, 09:00:20 am »

Michelle is also a transgender.
Report Spam   Logged
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #67 on: November 15, 2014, 08:56:07 am »

CNN Warns Viewers They're About to Hear National Anthem?



Friday The Daily Caller noted a bizarre viewer warning issued by CNN Thursday prior to a “heartwarming, patriotic and downright tearjerker story” that includes a video of children singing the National Anthem and waving American flags. Prior to shooting the video, the screen went black and the following warning appeared:

“Please be advised you are about to hear an excerpt of the national anthem.”

TheDC reports:

    The video story is entitled “Sailor mom surprises daughter at school.” It first appeared on CNN on Thursday — on loan from an Indianapolis Fox affiliate. […]

    The video itself includes kids singing and waving American flags. There are old, proud veterans. There are hand over hearts. At the end, there are well-deserved tears. You’ll probably blubber right along with mother and daughter — though CNN provides no crying warning.



http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/cnn-warns-viewers-theyre-about-hear-national-anthem
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #68 on: December 08, 2014, 08:22:22 am »

Liberalism at its finest...  Cheesy This one was too much

Lesbian Jewish Rabbi Stands Up FOR Sharia Law


If there is one group of people that would be put at the top of the list of Sharia law advocates for punishment, it would almost certainly be lesbian Jewish Rabbis like Robin Nafshi. Yet, in what can only be described as a case of Stockholm Syndrome on steroids, Nafshi is standing up for Sharia law. In so doing, she’s fighting for her own extermination.

In an op-ed that appeared in the Concord Monitor, Nafshi writes:

    As the leader of a religious community with a wide range of political views, I am always cautious when speaking out on partisan issues. But sometimes, I must. Now is that time.

    On Sept. 20, the delegates of the New Hampshire Republican Party adopted a Platform of Republican Principles. It contains 83 bulleted goals. Number 83 reads as follows:

    “Take any and all actions possible to protect against the implementation of any part of Sharia law in New Hampshire, including legislation outlawing Sharia law.”

    Sharia means “the way” in Arabic, and Sharia law guides all aspects of Muslim life, including daily routines, familial and religious obligations, and financial dealings. It is derived primarily from the Quran and the Sunna – the sayings, practices and teachings of the Prophet Mohammed.

    Sharia law for Muslims is quite similar to Halakhah for Jews. Halakhah means “the way” in Hebrew and it guides all aspect of Jewish life, including daily routines, familial and religious obligations, and financial dealings. It is derived primarily from the Hebrew Bible and the Talmud – the sayings, practices, and teachings of the early Jewish Rabbis.

    Why has the Republican Party singled out Sharia law? Why doesn’t it seek to protect against the implementation in New Hampshire of any part of Halakhah, or for that matter, Roman Catholic Canon Law?

    Because the New Hampshire Republican Party and other states that have sought similar bans are playing off of what they believe to be a growing fear in this country. We live in a difficult time, historically. Extremist Muslims – a very small percentage of the overall Muslim population – have hijacked a peaceful religion and perverted it into something narrowly construed and intolerant of the West, Jews, Israel, democracy, women’s education and more.

    The politicians who endorse anti-Sharia laws are exploiting Americans’ legitimate fears of ISIS, al Qaida, Hamas and other extremist groups in order to ostracize and discriminate against the American Muslim community.

As the stealth jihadists no doubt laugh their heads off (pun intended) at the level of sheer ignorance displayed by Nafshi, she fails to understand that not only is she advocating for her own destruction but in so doing, she’s facilitating it. In fact, those whom she chides for being opposed to Sharia law are further down on the list of candidates to be subjected to that law.

To use a fattened calf metaphor, in such a case the farmer has to provide the feed, the facilities, the care and ultimately slaughter said calf, which is an unwilling participant.

In the case of Nafshi, as the figurative calf, she’s doing all that for the farmer while also fighting off predators that would kill her, not to protect herself but to save herself for the farmer.

http://shoebat.com/2014/12/07/lesbian-jewish-rabbi-stands-sharia-law/
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #69 on: December 15, 2014, 06:09:56 am »

Liberalism at its finest...  Cheesy This one was too much

Lesbian Jewish Rabbi Stands Up FOR Sharia Law


If there is one group of people that would be put at the top of the list of Sharia law advocates for punishment, it would almost certainly be lesbian Jewish Rabbis like Robin Nafshi. Yet, in what can only be described as a case of Stockholm Syndrome on steroids, Nafshi is standing up for Sharia law. In so doing, she’s fighting for her own extermination.

In an op-ed that appeared in the Concord Monitor, Nafshi writes:

    As the leader of a religious community with a wide range of political views, I am always cautious when speaking out on partisan issues. But sometimes, I must. Now is that time.

    On Sept. 20, the delegates of the New Hampshire Republican Party adopted a Platform of Republican Principles. It contains 83 bulleted goals. Number 83 reads as follows:

    “Take any and all actions possible to protect against the implementation of any part of Sharia law in New Hampshire, including legislation outlawing Sharia law.”

    Sharia means “the way” in Arabic, and Sharia law guides all aspects of Muslim life, including daily routines, familial and religious obligations, and financial dealings. It is derived primarily from the Quran and the Sunna – the sayings, practices and teachings of the Prophet Mohammed.

    Sharia law for Muslims is quite similar to Halakhah for Jews. Halakhah means “the way” in Hebrew and it guides all aspect of Jewish life, including daily routines, familial and religious obligations, and financial dealings. It is derived primarily from the Hebrew Bible and the Talmud – the sayings, practices, and teachings of the early Jewish Rabbis.

    Why has the Republican Party singled out Sharia law? Why doesn’t it seek to protect against the implementation in New Hampshire of any part of Halakhah, or for that matter, Roman Catholic Canon Law?

    Because the New Hampshire Republican Party and other states that have sought similar bans are playing off of what they believe to be a growing fear in this country. We live in a difficult time, historically. Extremist Muslims – a very small percentage of the overall Muslim population – have hijacked a peaceful religion and perverted it into something narrowly construed and intolerant of the West, Jews, Israel, democracy, women’s education and more.

    The politicians who endorse anti-Sharia laws are exploiting Americans’ legitimate fears of ISIS, al Qaida, Hamas and other extremist groups in order to ostracize and discriminate against the American Muslim community.

As the stealth jihadists no doubt laugh their heads off (pun intended) at the level of sheer ignorance displayed by Nafshi, she fails to understand that not only is she advocating for her own destruction but in so doing, she’s facilitating it. In fact, those whom she chides for being opposed to Sharia law are further down on the list of candidates to be subjected to that law.

To use a fattened calf metaphor, in such a case the farmer has to provide the feed, the facilities, the care and ultimately slaughter said calf, which is an unwilling participant.

In the case of Nafshi, as the figurative calf, she’s doing all that for the farmer while also fighting off predators that would kill her, not to protect herself but to save herself for the farmer.

http://shoebat.com/2014/12/07/lesbian-jewish-rabbi-stands-sharia-law/

Hey lady, i thought this was good for all of you rabbi sodomites?   Cheesy

Cairo bathhouse raid spreads fear in Egyptian gay community


Egypt’s government has aggressively cracked down on Islamist and liberal opponents over the past year. Now officials are increasingly targeting another group: gay people. Police raided a public bathhouse in Cairo this month and arrested at least two dozen men, parading them half-naked in front of television cameras before hauling them off to prison.   

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/cairo-bathhouse-raid-spreads-fear-in-egyptian-gay-community/2014/12/13/2b332d96-7fc8-11e4-b936-f3afab0155a7_story.html
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #70 on: December 15, 2014, 06:12:01 pm »

Dumb Australians want to be murdered by muslims

Sydney Newspaper Urges 'Empathy,' Forgiveness For Hostage-Taker

 In an article published Monday, the Sydney Morning Herald called the hostage situation at the Lundt Café a test of “what sort of nation we want to be.” This latest attack on innocent civilians—conducted by what by all reports appears to be a violent radical with a criminal record including "extremist activity" and charges of **** and accessory to murder—the Sydney Morning Herald argues, requires Australians to "first and foremost" empathize with and forgive the criminal.

    First and foremost, we have faced yet another test of our empathy. Like the Bali bombings and myriad natural disasters, our thoughts are with the innocent victims: those inside the cafe who were caught up in a tragic situation for no other reason than they were going about their daily lives. Our thoughts are with their loved ones, too, for the hard times ahead.

    Perhaps we face an even more difficult test of our empathy as well. How should we feel for the perpetrator so far witnessed and his family? While we do not know his story or his motivation, we know he was once someone just like those people whose lives he has now treated with such disdain. He must have loved ones, too. Forgiving him will be very difficult, and it will take time. Without forgiveness, though, we have to live with destructive hate.

The man the Herald asks Australians to empathize with has a long, sordid rap sheet. The Daily Mail provides the following bio on the self-described “sheik” Man Haron Monis:

    Monis is a 49-year-old man living in southwest Sydney, but is originally from Iran and a self-proclaimed sheik, and also sent hate mail to the families of Australian dead soldiers between 2007 and 2009, according to The Daily Telegraph.

    The siege in the Lindt cafe in Martin Place on Monday follows an unsuccessful attempt to have these charges overturned in the High Court on Friday, The Age reported.

    Monis received 300 community service hours and a two-year good behaviour bond for the correspondence, which he claims were his version of sympathy cards, sent with the help from his girlfriend Amirah Droudis.

    Arriving as a refugee in Australia in 1996, the hostage-taker was charged as an accessory to the murder of his ex-wife - who was allegedly stabbed and set on fire on a flight of stairs in her western Sydney apartment block in November 2013.

    The man's current partner was charged with murder but they both received bail as the case was deemed too weak.

    He was also arrested in April this year for the sexual assault of a 27-year-old woman in 2002 after luring her to his clinic following claims he was as an expert in astrology, meditation and black magic, The Daily Telegraph also reported.

    Monis was slapped with an additional 40 charges in October after more victims to come forward after the alleged incidents that occurred from his spiritual healing clinic in Station Street in Wentworthville - western Sydney.

An "anti-Islamophic" hashtag movement,#IllRideWithYou has sprung up in response to "racist" sentiments reportedly expressed by Australians against Muslims on public transport, gaining global traction and official endorsement by Australia's Race Discrimination Commissioner Tim Soutphommasane.


http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/sydney-newspaper-urges-empathy-forgiveness-hostage-taker
« Last Edit: December 15, 2014, 06:21:48 pm by Mark » Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #71 on: January 14, 2015, 12:19:33 pm »

Dems Were Asked to Support the Deportation of Illegal Immigrants Convicted of Violence and Sexual Abuse. Here’s How They Voted.

Dozens of House Democrats on Wednesday voted against a legislative proposal aimed at ensuring that illegal immigrants convicted of domestic violence, sexual abuse or child abuse are a priority for deportation.

The vote suggests that immigration-related issues trump other traditional Democratic priorities, such as efforts to protect people from sex or violence-related crimes, especially against women.

Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) proposed the language as an amendment to the Department of Homeland Security spending bill. He argued it was needed because Obama’s executive action on immigration created different priorities for deportation that need to be adjusted.

For example, illegal immigrants suspected of terrorism or espionage or other felonies are top priorities for deportation. But illegal immigrants who are convicted of three or more misdemeanors, or one “significant” misdemeanor such as sexual abuse or domestic violence, are on a second tier priority for deportation.

On Wednesday, House Republicans put forward the DeSantis amendment to prioritize the deportation of illegal immigrants convicted of domestic violence, sexual abuse or child abuse. But they were met by significant Democratic opposition, including from House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who is widely seen as a champion of women’s issues.

Pelosi explained that she opposed the amendment because it was opposed by the National Catholic Conference of Bishops. That group said generally that it opposed all efforts to stop the Obama administration from implementing its immigration plan, and that it could somehow create obstacles to the reporting of domestic violence among immigrants.

“While presented as a measure that helps domestic violence victims, we fear that it actually would discourage many such victims from reporting abuse,” the group wrote, in a letter Pelosi read on the House floor.

Rep. Donna Edwards (D-Md.) also explained that in many domestic violence cases involving illegal immigrants, police arrest both the abuser and the victim, and both can end up pleading to a misdemeanor just to speed up the process. “This happens all the time, all around the country,” she argued.

As a result, she said the GOP language could end up hurting victims as well as abusers.

Those arguments were met with disbelief from Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.), who sponsored the amendment. DeSantis said he was “perplexed” why anyone would vote against the amendment.

“Why would we have any tolerance for child molesters?” Desalts said. “If you’re not in our country legally, and you get convicted of an offense like that, you should be gone. We shouldn’t even be discussing this.”

“I think the people who are going to vote ‘no’ on this are basically saying, ‘we don’t want a zero-tolerance policy against child molesters and sexual offenders,’ ” he added.

In the end, the House approved the DeSantis amendment 278-149 vote. Thirty-five Democrats voted with Republicans on this measure, and one Republican voted against it.

But that left 148 Democrats voting against it.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/01/14/dems-were-asked-to-support-the-deportation-of-illegal-immigrants-convicted-of-violence-and-sexual-abuse-heres-how-they-voted/
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #72 on: February 13, 2015, 12:09:08 pm »

Shirley MacLaine: Jews Died in Holocaust Due to Sins in Past Lives

Actress and Democratic Party supporter Shirley MacLaine is under fire for suggesting that the six million Jews slaughtered by the Nazis were paying for their past sins.
 
According to the Daily Mail the Oscar-winner writes in her new memoir:
 
    "What if most Holocaust victims were balancing their karma from ages before, when they were Roman soldiers putting Christians to death, the Crusaders who murdered millions in the name of Christianity, soldiers with Hannibal, or those who stormed across the Near East with Alexander? The energy of killing is endless and will be experienced by the killer and the killee."

MacLaine is a longtime supporter of the Democratic Party and left-wing activist.
 
An ardent abortion activist, she lobbied at the 1972 Democratic Convention for abortion rights in the party platform.
 
She is the Godmother of liberal icon Rep. Dennis Kucinich.
 
In 2013, she received the Kennedy Center award from President Barack Obama.
 
She has suggested an alien may have been responsible for Ronald Reagan's presidency.
 
And now, apparently, she thinks the Jews had it coming. 


http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/shirley-maclaine-jews-died-holocaust-due-sins-past-lives
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #73 on: February 13, 2015, 12:23:27 pm »

CNN’s Cuomo: ‘Our Rights Do Not Come from God’

In a contentious 25-minute interview with Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore on Thursday, CNN “New Day” co-host Chris Cuomo discussed Moore’s refusal to adhere to a federal judge’s ruling on same-sex marriages.

Cuomo and Moore disagreed on whether or not the federal court decision was binding to the point that it required the state of Alabama to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. But they also continued the argument to the point of where certain rights originate, to which Cuomo argued they came from man and law, and not from God.

Exchange as follow:

    MOORE: I believe that’s a matter of law because our rights contained in the Bill of Rights do not come from the Constitution, they come from God. It’s clearly stated –

    CUOMO: Our laws do not come from God, your honor, and you know that. They come from man.

    MOORE: Let me ask you one question. Let me ask you one question, Chris. Is the Declaration of Independence law?

    CUOMO: You would call it organic law as a basis for future laws off of it?

    MOORE: I would call it the organic law because the United States code calls it organic law. It is organic law because the law of this country calls it the organic law of the country means where our rights come from. And if they come from there, men can’t take it away.

    CUOMO: Our rights do not come from God. That’s your faith. That’s my faith, but not our country. Our laws come from the collective agreement and compromise.

    MOORE: It’s not a matter of faith, sir. It’s a matter of organic law, which states, ‘We hold these truths to be held equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.’ And the only role of government is stated in the next sentence is to secure those rights for us. The government starts taking those rights away from us, then it’s not securing and it is defiling the whole purpose of government.

Watch the entire interview:

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/02/12/cnns-cuomo-our-rights-do-not-come-from-god/

Just your basic liberal, cant think for themselves are are just hypocrites...

CNN’s Chris Cuomo Gives an Unbelievable Answer on Whether He’d Enforce Dred Scott

I don’t know that I have ever seen this level of unforced error from anyone on television ever. In an interview with Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore over a federal district court’s order on gay marriage, CNN’s Chris Cuomo first asserted that a majority of people support gay marriage, as opposed to a plurality. I’m pretty sure he was just talking about Alabama, which makes it even worse.

Further, Chris Cuomo did not understand the nuances of the case. The probate courts in Alabama issue marriage license. The federal district court enjoined the Alabama Attorney General, who plays no role in issuing marriage licenses. And Chief Justice Moore, for all his faults, was right to point out that the federal court’s order did not apply to probate judges. Chris Cuomo did not understand, or did not want to understand that.

But the most damning part of the interview came with Chief Justice Moore asked Chris Cuomo if Cuomo would have adhered to Dred Scott, which treated black people as inferior to white people, or Plessy v. Ferguson, which established separate but equal as the law of the land.

Cuomo tried to get out of answering the question, but Chief Justice Moore demanded Cuomo answer it. It is safe to say, Cuomo would have enforced both Dred Scott and Plessy based on his answer, which was “You follow the law of the land. You follow the law of the land. That’s what our nation is based on.”

See for yourself and note that earlier in the interview Cuomo said our rights come from people, refuting the Declaration of Independence.

vid: http://www.redstate.com/2015/02/12/cnns-chris-cuomo-gives-an-unbelievable-answer-on-whether-hed-enforce-dred-scott/
« Last Edit: February 13, 2015, 12:27:32 pm by Mark » Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #74 on: February 13, 2015, 01:05:11 pm »

Shirley MacLaine: Jews Died in Holocaust Due to Sins in Past Lives

Actress and Democratic Party supporter Shirley MacLaine is under fire for suggesting that the six million Jews slaughtered by the Nazis were paying for their past sins.
 
According to the Daily Mail the Oscar-winner writes in her new memoir:
 
    "What if most Holocaust victims were balancing their karma from ages before, when they were Roman soldiers putting Christians to death, the Crusaders who murdered millions in the name of Christianity, soldiers with Hannibal, or those who stormed across the Near East with Alexander? The energy of killing is endless and will be experienced by the killer and the killee."

MacLaine is a longtime supporter of the Democratic Party and left-wing activist.
 
An ardent abortion activist, she lobbied at the 1972 Democratic Convention for abortion rights in the party platform.
 
She is the Godmother of liberal icon Rep. Dennis Kucinich.
 
In 2013, she received the Kennedy Center award from President Barack Obama.
 
She has suggested an alien may have been responsible for Ronald Reagan's presidency.
 
And now, apparently, she thinks the Jews had it coming. 


http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/shirley-maclaine-jews-died-holocaust-due-sins-past-lives

She's a hard-core New Ager - all New Agers(and the New Age Movement) that I've read about just HATE the Jews.

Neale Donald Walsch is another example(who wrote about his hatred for the Jews) - Rick Warren gives out his writings to his youth groups and flock.
Report Spam   Logged
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #75 on: February 24, 2015, 07:02:09 am »

Report: VA Secretary Robert McDonald apologizes for misstating military record

Wow!! Imagine that, another Obama Lib who lies about who he is...

Robert McDonald, the secretary of veterans affairs, misrepresented his military record in a recent TV appearance, falsely stating that he was in an elite special operations division.

McDonald, a West Point grad who served with the 82nd Airborne Division during the late 1970s, has issued an apology for the misstatement, reported the Huffington Post’s David Wood.

There was no suggestion in Wood’s story of any pattern of misstatements by McDonald. The comment in question came while McDonald was being filmed by a CBS News crew as he toured Los Angeles during a count of homeless veterans, one of whom told McDonald he had served in special ops. McDonald replied: “Special forces? What years? I was in special forces.” The segment aired Jan. 30.

In a statement reported by the AP, McDonald said:  “While I was in Los Angeles, engaging a homeless individual to determine his veteran status, I asked the man where he had served in the military. He responded that he had served in special forces. I incorrectly stated that I had been in special forces. That was inaccurate and I apologize to anyone that was offended by my misstatement.”

“We take him at his word and expect that this will not impact the important work he’s doing to promote the health and well-being of our nation’s veterans,” said a statement from the White House, according to the AP.

The special forces claim, which came in the middle of the controversy over NBC news anchor Brian Williams’s honesty, was noticed by some retired military officers.

McDonald told Wood: “I have no excuse. I was not in special forces.”

Special operations forces include the Green Berets, Army Rangers, Delta Force and Navy SEALs. “Special operators are a close-knit community deeply hostile to outsiders who try to claim the coveted mantle of special operations,” wrote Wood, who won a Pulitzer Prize in 2012 for his reporting on the “physical and emotional challenges facing American soldiers severely wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan during a decade of war.”

Wood reported that McDonald, the former chief executive of Procter and **** brought in to shape up the embattled department, completed Army Ranger training but “never served in a Ranger battalion or any other special operations unit.”

Wood quoted retired Army Col. Gary Bloomberg, a former special forces commander, calling McDonald’s claim “a boneheaded statement.” But he said he and other former special ops officers did not consider it as egregious as some other misrepresentations.

“No one got really crazy about the whole thing, compared to some of what we’ve seen,” he told the Huffington Post. “It’s a lot different from guys running around faking their special forces credentials. … I can see [other former special forces soldiers] going, ‘Hey, check out this boneheaded remark,’ but I don’t see the gravitas that I would with a guy wearing medals he didn’t earn.’”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/02/24/report-va-secretary-robert-mcdonald-apologizes-for-misstating-military-record/

Bet he said he was a NAVY SEAL and a CIA Sniper just to pick up girls 30 years younger than him..
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #76 on: February 25, 2015, 10:16:42 am »

Writer Argues Abortion is a Good Thing Because It Prevents Infanticide

In a new article on Lancaster Online, writer Liliane Stern argues that abortion is good for society because it prevents infanticide.

She writes, “In the United States, the infanticide rate during the first hour of life dropped from 1.41 per 100,000 from 1963 to 1972 to 0.44 per 100,000 for 1974 to 1983; the rates during the first month of life also declined, whereas those for older infants rose during this time.”

Then Stern cites a study by economists with the National Bureau of Economic Research, which claims that abortion was the most important factor in the decline of neonatal mortality during the period from 1964 to 1977.

She continues, “Screening for psychiatric disorders or risk factors, and providing treatment or assistance to those at risk, may help prevent infanticide. However, in the developed world, significant proportions of neonaticides that are detected occur in young women who deny their pregnancy and avoid outside contacts so they may have limited contact with health care services. In some areas, baby hatches — safe places for a mother to anonymously leave an infant — are offered, in part to reduce the rate of infanticide. In other places, safe-haven laws allow mothers to anonymously give infants to designated officials. Typically such babies are put up for adoption or cared for in orphanages. Unfortunately, many mothers fear being identified.”

CLICK LIKE IF YOU’RE PRO-LIFE!

 

She concludes with this question: “Is it not better to make safe, legal, first-trimester abortions easily available than to have unwanted infants and children tortured, abused and killed, as happens much too often in the U.S.?”

Unfortunately, the twisted ideology that is revealed in Stern’s question is surfacing more and more because we live in a world that believes if a person is destined to suffer, they should die. Many say, “We would not want to bring a child into the world only to see her suffer, terminating would be a kind, even humane act.”

babyshoes2

However, if Stern’s logic were applied millions of people wouldn’t be here today simply because they would face suffering. Why? Because in reality, Stern is saying that children who are being abused; children born with disabilities; and many children in our foster care system shouldn’t have been born.

Currently, in the United States there are over five million children being abused annually; and eight million children are born each year with some type of birth defect. I don’t know about you, but I don’t believe suffering should justify the genocide of millions of people; rather, it should motivate pro-lifers to push for social change.

Additionally, studies show that the acceptance of abortion has lead to infanticide.

As LifeNews previously reported, in the Journal of Medical Ethics, ethicists argue that parents should have the right to kill their newborn infants because infants are not people. The authors prefer the term ‘after-birth abortion’ as opposed to ‘infanticide’ because the term after-birth abortion emphasizes ‘that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable to that of a fetus . . . rather than to that of a child.’

Here’s an important question we should ask ourselves: if an unborn child’s right to life can be denied based on criteria like the existence of suffering or simply the wishes of the mother, then what’s to stop similar criteria from nullifying the right to life for the elderly, the disabled, or even the very young?

http://www.lifenews.com/2015/02/25/writer-argues-abortion-is-a-good-thing-because-it-prevents-infanticide/
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #77 on: March 31, 2015, 11:58:34 am »

Apple Bashes Indiana – But Promotes Business in Countries That Execute Gays

Apple CEO Tim Cook attacked Indiana this weekend for passing a religious freedom bill.
Cook said, “There’s something very dangerous happening in states across the country.”



Cook may believe Indiana’s new law is very dangerous towards gays…
But it’s not as dangerous as the several countries Apple does business with where they execute gays.



Four of the ten countries where they kill gays are on this Apple list:
– Uganda
– Nigeria
– Qatar
– Saudi Arabia

If Tim Cook really wanted to help gays, he might want to focus on the Apple customers who execute them.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/03/apple-bashes-indiana-but-gladly-does-business-with-countries-that-execute-gays/
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #78 on: April 18, 2015, 06:30:04 am »

UC Santa Cruz Apologizes For Serving Mexican Food

After offering Mexican food during its “Intergalactic” night, Stevenson College at the University of California, Santa Cruz found that some students took offense, calling the action racist because of a perceived link between intergalactic aliens and Mexican illegal immigrants.

Pundit Press, which first reported the incident, reports that the College apologized for its “Mexican food buffet,” as Dr. Carolyn Golz, a College Administrative Officer for Cowell & Stevenson Colleges, stated in a letter to students, “We would never want to make a connection between individuals of Latino heritage or undocumented students and ‘aliens’ and I am so sorry that our College Night appeared to do exactly that.”

In 2013-2014, the undergraduate student population at the University of Santa Cruz was 28% Latino; 11% of graduate students were Latino.

Golz added that the incident “demonstrated a cultural insensitivity on the part of the program planners and, though it was an unintentional mistake, I recognize that this incident caused harm within our community and negatively impacted students.” She insisted that that she “will require cultural competence training for Programs staff, in addition to implementing mechanisms for future program planning that will ensure college programs are culturally sensitive and inclusive.” Golz pointed out that she is “an ally for students of color and, in particular, undocumented students … (and) committed to ensuring that student life staff receive the training necessary to make sure that this type of incident does not happen again at Stevenson.”

Golz asserted, “I am working closing (sic) with Donnae Smith, Coordinator for Diversity and Inclusion for Colleges, Housing and Educational Services (CHES) to continue to increase the cultural intelligence (CQ) of our staff,” and concluded by urging students to report “hate” to http://reporthate.ucsc.edu/.


http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/uc-santa-cruz-apologizes-serving-mexican-food
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #79 on: April 19, 2015, 09:58:18 am »

DeGrasse Tyson to Journalists: Don't Question Scientists or Climate Change
Would signal "the beginning of the end of an informed democracy."


This from a guy that lies all the time

In an interview with ThinkProgress.org, star scientist Neil deGrasse Tyson said there's no more reason to question climate change than there is to question if the world is flat. He even encouraged journalists not to offer another side to the story because there is no debate when it comes to "emergent scientific truths."

Tyson also stated that when politicians begin denying climate change, it signals "the beginning of the end of an informed democracy."

"If you want to lean in a political way because that’s your politics, you should do that based on an objective truth rather than cherry-picking science before you even land at an objective truth," Tyson stated. "You can’t just cherry-pick data and choose what is true about the world and what isn’t."

He added that basing decisions on these scientific truths "will play a fundamental role in what kind of society we create for ourselves."

When asked what responsibility the media has in all of this, Tyson responded:

    There’s this journalistic ethos saying if I get one opinion then I need to get another opinion that countervails that. So if I say the world is round, are you obligated to say the world is flat, lest someone think you are being biased in your reporting? Well, that’s absurd. You wouldn’t do that, you’re educated. You know that there are certain points of view that have no foundation at all in objective truth.

    So the question arises then at what point should a journalist give equal time to equal points of view that are opposite or in denial of emergent scientific truths. If you allocated column inches in proportion to the scientific consensus of experiments, there would be one sentence talking about people who deny climate change and the rest of the ten columns talking about research that supports it. But that’s not what we see in the public.

    I think journalists are abandoning what would be their sensibility of following the emergent truths and in some cases painting a debate as though there’s a scientific debate when in fact there isn’t one — and that makes for headlines and more clicks.

In fact, Tyson declared that he doesn't even bother participating in debates -- "ever." He reasoned:

    [B ]ecause that implies that we each have opinions and “oh let’s see who can give the best argument for this audience so they can believe my opinion instead of yours.” But if you’re more charismatic than I am or have better word use, or are more articulate, then you’ll win the debate, and that means you’ll be right and I’ll be wrong. This is not how it works.

Tyson is currently promoting his new show StarTalk which begins in April on the National Geographic Channel and hopes to break new ground in becoming the "first late-night science talk show," according to the interview. Guests will include fellow scientist Bill Nye, Richard Dawkins, George Takei, and Ariana Huffington -- undoubtedly, as Think Progress notes, "the science will go down easy."

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/degrasse-tyson-journalists-dont-question-scientists-or-climate-change
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #80 on: April 25, 2015, 08:53:52 am »

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/240053-bruce-jenner-comes-out-as-a-transgender-conservative-republican
April 24, 2015, 11:43 pm
Bruce Jenner comes out as a transgender conservative Republican

In an interview with ABC's Diane Sawyer which aired Friday night, former track and field Olympian Bruce Jenner acknowledged for the first time that he was a transgender American.

"Yes, for all intents and purposes, I'm a woman," Jenner told Sawyer on ABC News’ "20/20."

The more shocking revelation for many, however, was Jenner's ADMISSION that in addition to identifying as a woman, he also identified as a conservative Republican.

"Are you a Republican?" a stunned Sawyer asked the former patriarch of the Jenner-Kardashian household. "Yeah," Jenner reticently responded. "Is that a bad thing?"

"Neither political party has a monopoly on understanding," Jenner told Sawyer, who advised him to ask Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker John Boehner for help championing the cause of transgender people.

"I would do that, in a heartbeat," Jenner retorted. "Yeah, why not?"

At least one Republican group didn't wait for Jenner to reach out to them before welcoming him with open arms: The LOG Cabin Republicans.

Log Cabin Republicans National Executive Director Gregory T. Angelo released this statement following tonight's interview:

As the nation’s only organization representing LGBT conservatives and straight allies, Log Cabin Republicans CONGRATULATES Bruce Jenner in the tremendous courage he demonstrated tonight, being true to himself both in terms of his personal identity as well as his political identity. There is a home for you in Log Cabin Republicans — as there is for all lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, and transgender conservatives and straight allies.
Report Spam   Logged
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #81 on: July 10, 2015, 09:00:57 am »

Democrat Lois Capps Launches Pro-LGBT Bill To Ban The Words “Husband” And “Wife” As Hate Speech

In light of the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry and that states have an obligation to perform same-sex marriages, Rep. Lois Capps (CA-24) introduced a bill to ensure that the United States Code reflects the equality of all marriages.

    EDITOR”S NOTE: No, sadly, this is not satire. All the information in this article was taken directly and in total from the official site of Congresswoman Lois Capps from California. But what it shows is the level of Godless insanity that America is approaching as we flirt with our own destruction. Capp’s bill is proof-positive of what we have been saying all along. The LGBT is not after “marriage equality”, they are after the destruction of heterosexual marriage altogether.

The Amend the Code for Marriage Equality Act of 2015 would strike the use of gendered terms such as “husband” and “wife” from the federal code and replace them with more gender-neutral terms, such as “spouse” or “married couple.”

“The Amend the Code for Marriage Equality Act recognizes that the words in our laws have meaning and can continue to reflect prejudice and discrimination even when rendered null by our highest courts,” Capps said. “Our values as a country are reflected in our laws. I authored this bill because it is imperative that our federal code reflect the equality of all marriages.”

The proposed legislation would not only ensure that the code reflects marriage equality, but it could also make several positive changes to the U.S. Code by removing areas of gender discrimination written into federal law. For instance, it is currently illegal to threaten the President’s wife – but not the President’s husband. Capps’ bill would update the code to make it illegal to threaten the President’s spouse. The bill would correct a number of these types of discrepancies in the code.

The bill currently has 23 original cosponsors. source

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=34036
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #82 on: July 25, 2015, 11:26:26 am »

Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #83 on: August 01, 2015, 01:13:03 pm »

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ceo-raised-minimum-wage-70-212850113.html
A CEO raised his company's minimum wage to $70,000 a year, and some employees quit because of it
7/31/15

When Dan Price, founder and CEO of the Seattle-based credit-card-payment processing firm Gravity Payments, announced he was raising the company's minimum salary to $70,000 a year, he was met with overwhelming enthusiasm.

"Everyone start[ed] screaming and cheering and just going crazy," Price told Business Insider shortly after he broke the news in April.

One employee told him the raise would allow him to fly his mom out from Puerto Rico to visit him in Seattle. Another said the raise would make it possible for him to raise a family with his wife. Overnight, Price became something of a folk hero — a small-business owner taking income inequality into his own hands.

But in the weeks since then, it's become clear that not everyone is equally pleased. Among the critics? Some of Price's own employees.

The New York Times reports that two of Gravity Payments' "most valued" members have left the company, "spurred in part by their view that it was unfair to double the pay of some new hires while the longest-serving staff members got small or no raises."

Maisey McMaster — once a big supporter of the plan — is one of the employees that quit. McMaster, 26, joined the company five years ago, eventually working her way up to financial manager. She put in long hours that "left little time for her husband and extended family," The Times says, but she loved the "special culture" of the place.

But while she was initially on board, helping to calculate whether the company could afford to raise salaries so drastically (the plan is a minimum of $70,000 over the course of three years), McMaster later began to have doubts.

"He gave raises to people who have the least skills and are the least equipped to do the job, and the ones who were taking on the most didn’t get much of a bump," she told The Times. A fairer plan, she told the paper, would give newer employees smaller increases, along with the chance to earn a more substantial raise with more experience.

Gravity's web developer, Grant Moran, 29, had similar concerns. While his own salary saw a bump — to $50,000, up from $41,000, in the first stage of the raise — he worried the new policy didn't reward work ethic. "Now the people who were just clocking in and out were making the same as me," he tells The Times. "It shackles high performers to less motivated team members."

He also didn't like that his salary was now so public, thanks to the media attention, and he worried that if he got used to the salary boost, he might never leave to pursue his ultimate goal of moving to a digital company. Like McMaster, Moran opted to leave.

But according to the Times, even employees who are "exhilarated by the raises" have new concerns, worrying that maybe their performances don't merit the money. (Arguably, this is evidence the increase is actually a good idea, potentially motivating people to achieve more.)

For his part, Price — who's also under fire from other local business owners and his brother, who says Price owes him money — stands by his plan, but doesn't begrudge his critics. "There’s no perfect way to do this and no way to handle complex workplace issues that doesn’t have any downsides or trade-offs," he tells the Times. "I came up with the best solution I could." And certainly, many of his employees agree.
Report Spam   Logged
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #84 on: August 03, 2015, 02:31:16 pm »


Video: Hillary Supporters Call For Repealing Bill of Rights
"You can't have the rules of yesteryear now"




Asked by Mark Dice whether they would advocate Hillary’s ‘primary campaign promise’ to “help with the new world order,” virtually all were in agreement.

“Do you think it’s time we get behind her and support the repeal,” Dice asked one woman, who responded, “I think it is, I think we need change like they’ve been promising us for so many years, I think it’s time to get behind Hillary Clinton and support her.”

Referring to the bill of rights, the woman added, “You can’t have the rules of yesteryear now, so much has changed….we live in a different world now,” before again emphasizing that she supported Hillary’s plan to repeal the freedoms outlined by the founding fathers.

Another woman concurred that it was a “good time to look at” repealing the bill of rights, another young lady agreed that it was necessary to “move America forward.”

Yet another individual remarked that the bill of rights was, “somewhat outdated,” while another two women blithely supported abolishing the founding document to “help America progress.”

An African-American man who said he “agreed with a lot of Hillary’s policies” said he wouldn’t repeal the entire bill of rights, just part of it, namely the ones that “are related to injustices to the blacks.”

Suffice to say, the man couldn’t actually name any of the bill of rights or why they were unjust towards black people. After he implied that the bill of rights itself was racist, the man acknowledged, “this is just coming from a guess.”

Dice’s video once again illustrates not just how profoundly dumb many Americans are when it comes to any political issue, but how ignorant they are of their own country’s history and the hard fought freedoms they now enjoy, as well as how easy it is to attain consent from the general public for the most outrageous things just by using trendy buzzwords.

http://www.infowars.com/video-hillary-supporters-call-for-repealing-bill-of-rights/
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #85 on: August 25, 2015, 09:09:51 pm »

 Shocked WOW, just wow

Liberal Lunacy: People Who Steal from Wal-Mart Should not be Arrested

You never know what is going to come out of the mouth of a liberal college administrator. Just when you think you've heard it all, some left-wing nut says something even stranger. The latest example comes in the form of a panel discussion in which one participant said that "police should stop prosecuting individuals who shoplift from Wal-Mart and Target."

As reported by MRCtv.org, Everett D. Mitchell, the Director of Community Relations at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, was participating in a discussion titled "Best Policing Practices" when he came up with the profound "logic" that people who steal should not be arrested.



    Everett Mitchell: "I just don’t think they should be prosecuting cases for people who steal from Wal-Mart. I don’t think that. I don’t think that Target, and all them other places – the big boxes that have insurance – they should be using the people that steal from there as justification to start engaging in aggressive police behavior."

To add to the anti-police ideas being pushed at this university, professors Sara L. McKinnon and Karma R. Chavez wrote a letter to the editor in which they call on the police force to stop patrolling certain areas of the city.

    We write this as a white lesbian woman and a light-skinned queer Chicana in solidarity with the Young Gifted and Black Coalition. ... We urge Koval to sincerely consider the demand for no police interaction. It is not an unreasonable request because for many of us in this city, it is already the reality. We also call on other nonblack people in Madison to think about the privilege of living without an occupying force in your neighborhood.

What is going on here? Have these people lost all touch with reality? I'm sure there are plenty of police officers who would rather not patrol certain areas, but that's what they do. They put their lives on the line so that others can be safe... and so others, like these so-called "educators" can point fingers and criticize.

http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/2015/08/25/liberal-lunacy-people-who-steal-from-wal-mart-should-not-be-arrested/?subscriber=1
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #86 on: October 15, 2015, 06:17:31 am »

Reporter Asks DNC Chair Schultz If Her Children Were Human Beings As Fetuses
"They're human beings today."


While Bernie Sanders was sucking up to Queen Hillary at Tuesday night's charade of a debate, MRC TV asked DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz a very up-close and personal question on abortion: whether or not she thought her children were actually human beings while in the womb.

Schultz refused to give a simple "yes" or "no" answer, opting instead to fall back onto Democratic talking points. Based on her answers, it begs the question as to why MRC TV didn't just point-blank ask if she would've aborted her own children if she had been given the opportunity – her answers certainly don't suggest otherwise.  Transcript below:

MRC TV: You have three children, correct?

Wasserman Schultz: I do.

MRC TV: How old are they?

Wasserman Schultz: I have twin 16-year-olds and a 12-year-old.

MRC TV: In your opinion, were they human beings before they were born?

Wasserman Schultz: You know, I believe that every woman has the right to make their own reproductive choices.

MRC TV: But what did you believe about your children?

Wasserman Schultz: That I had the right to make my own reproductive choices, which I was glad to have and which I was proud to have.

MRC TV: So were they human beings? Just yes or no.

Wasserman Schultz: They’re human beings today, and I’m glad I had the opportunity to make my own reproductive choices, as – a right that every woman has and should maintain.

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/reporter-asks-dnc-chair-schultz-if-her-children-were-human-beings-fetuses
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21729



View Profile
« Reply #87 on: October 15, 2015, 01:46:45 pm »

The DNC is ran by a bunch of femon@zi,  baby-blood thirsty witches.

ALL THE WOULD-BE PRESIDENT'S WOMEN

The Democratic National Committee's party hierarchy has more women than men in elected positions, and females hold the party's top executive roles.
The organization's chair, three of its five vice chairs, several top communicators and both the CEO and COO are all women:

Chairwoman Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Vice chair Donna Brazile
Vice chair Maria Elena Durazo
Vice chair Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard
Secretary Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake
Chief Executive Officer Amy Dacey
Chief Operating Officer Lindsey Reynolds
National Press Secretary Holly Shulman
Deputy National Press Secretary Miryam Lipper
Research Director Lauren Dillon
Deputy Research Director Lauren Smith
Convention Committee CEO Rev. Leah Daughtry


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3273404/Democratic-National-Committeewoman-says-party-clearing-path-Hillary-women-charge-want-way.html#ixzz3ofDd6iCx
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #88 on: October 15, 2015, 01:54:26 pm »

The DNC is ran by a bunch of femon@zi,  baby-blood thirsty witches.

ALL THE WOULD-BE PRESIDENT'S WOMEN

The Democratic National Committee's party hierarchy has more women than men in elected positions, and females hold the party's top executive roles.
The organization's chair, three of its five vice chairs, several top communicators and both the CEO and COO are all women:

Chairwoman Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Vice chair Donna Brazile
Vice chair Maria Elena Durazo
Vice chair Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard
Secretary Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake
Chief Executive Officer Amy Dacey
Chief Operating Officer Lindsey Reynolds
National Press Secretary Holly Shulman
Deputy National Press Secretary Miryam Lipper
Research Director Lauren Dillon
Deputy Research Director Lauren Smith
Convention Committee CEO Rev. Leah Daughtry


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3273404/Democratic-National-Committeewoman-says-party-clearing-path-Hillary-women-charge-want-way.html#ixzz3ofDd6iCx


It was an article you posted yesterday - like 60% of people that get college degrees nowdays are females.

They are taking over the GOP too, slowly but surely - I read in January that the Republican lead Congress couldn't get an anti-abortion bill through, b/c 22 GOP Congresswomen lead a revolt.

And not to mention too sadly, Nancy Pelosi is acts more of a man than John Boehner does.
Report Spam   Logged
RickStudy
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 80


View Profile
« Reply #89 on: October 22, 2015, 08:23:26 pm »

It makes little difference. Demommunist or Republicanazi, both parties are two sides of the same coin who have been assigned different tasks to accomplish by the puppeteer. Christian support of the neocon right is a mystery to me.
Report Spam   Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
Free SMF Hosting - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy