End Times and Current Events
October 04, 2024, 01:41:10 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome To End Times and Current Events.
 
  Home Help Search Gallery Staff List Login Register  

The-Kinsey-Syndrome

Shoutbox
March 27, 2024, 12:55:24 pm Mark says: Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked  When Hamas spokesman Abu Ubaida began a speech marking the 100th day of the war in Gaza, one confounding yet eye-opening proclamation escaped the headlines. Listing the motives for the Palestinian militant group's Oct. 7 massacre in Israel, he accused Jews of "bringing red cows" to the Holy Land.
December 31, 2022, 10:08:58 am NilsFor1611 says: blessings
August 08, 2018, 02:38:10 am suzytr says: Hello, any good churches in the Sacto, CA area, also looking in Reno NV, thanks in advance and God Bless you Smiley
January 29, 2018, 01:21:57 am Christian40 says: It will be interesting to see what happens this year Israel being 70 years as a modern nation may 14 2018
October 17, 2017, 01:25:20 am Christian40 says: It is good to type Mark is here again!  Smiley
October 16, 2017, 03:28:18 am Christian40 says: anyone else thinking that time is accelerating now? it seems im doing days in shorter time now is time being affected in some way?
September 24, 2017, 10:45:16 pm Psalm 51:17 says: The specific rule pertaining to the national anthem is found on pages A62-63 of the league rulebook. It states: “The National Anthem must be played prior to every NFL game, and all players must be on the sideline for the National Anthem. “During the National Anthem, players on the field and bench area should stand at attention, face the flag, hold helmets in their left hand, and refrain from talking. The home team should ensure that the American flag is in good condition. It should be pointed out to players and coaches that we continue to be judged by the public in this area of respect for the flag and our country. Failure to be on the field by the start of the National Anthem may result in discipline, such as fines, suspensions, and/or the forfeiture of draft choice(s) for violations of the above, including first offenses.”
September 20, 2017, 04:32:32 am Christian40 says: "The most popular Hepatitis B vaccine is nothing short of a witch’s brew including aluminum, formaldehyde, yeast, amino acids, and soy. Aluminum is a known neurotoxin that destroys cellular metabolism and function. Hundreds of studies link to the ravaging effects of aluminum. The other proteins and formaldehyde serve to activate the immune system and open up the blood-brain barrier. This is NOT a good thing."
http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-08-11-new-fda-approved-hepatitis-b-vaccine-found-to-increase-heart-attack-risk-by-700.html
September 19, 2017, 03:59:21 am Christian40 says: bbc international did a video about there street preaching they are good witnesses
September 14, 2017, 08:06:04 am Psalm 51:17 says: bro Mark Hunter on YT has some good, edifying stuff too.
View Shout History
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The-Kinsey-Syndrome  (Read 24008 times)
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21826



View Profile
« Reply #120 on: May 18, 2016, 01:57:49 pm »

Salon Pushes **** Sympathy...Again
"I'm a ****, not a monster" same thing moron

Leftists over at Salon have skipped bestiality as their next conquest of sexual liberation and have moved straight on to pedophilia instead.

It all began in September last year with the article "I'm a ****, but not a monster," which featured self-identified **** Todd Nickerson of the website "Virtuous Pedophiles" classify his sexual disorder as a "sexual identity" that needs to be met with some kind of compassion. Though neither Nickerson nor Salon advocates that pedophiles should be allowed to act on their urges, they do feel they should be allowed to be open about their identities without facing repercussions or be ostracized, as if people would be wrong to shield their children from ever being in their presence.

In a new video released Tuesday, Salon featured Nickerson talking openly about the nature of his sexual disorder, which he classifies as an orientation, and how he manages to resist the urge to molest children.

According to Nickerson, at age 18, he babysat a five-year old girl and fell in love with her, and since he never wanted to act on his urges, he chose to privately "relieve" himself instead. Thankfully, he has never molested a child his whole life and doesn't wish to. Instead, Nickerson wants to foster a new attitude in society that allows pedophiles to openly identify as such so they won't be forced underground.

So, essentially, as is always true of the left, Nickerson and Salon have begun to argue that if someone molests a child, then it's society's fault for not accepting him. They want us to own pedophilia, rather than kick it to the shadows. Nickerson even says society has "persecuted" men such as himself. 

To make one thing clear, if someone has sexual fantasies about children and resists the urge to act, then that person needs to get help until those desires are eliminated or seriously diminished, and we should encourage that as long as they do. Many people who experience pedophilia were themselves victims of sexual abuse, and it is perfectly appropriate to hope for the healing of such a person.

Salon has moved way beyond that, however, by demanding we accept such a person as they are so long as they never molest a child. They want us to see that as part of who they are and not a grotesque disorder. There is no owning pedophilia, the same way there is no owning STD's as feminists do. Pedophiles have thoughts that need to go away, not merely be kept at bay.

In the comment boxes on Salon, some leftists have even gone so far as to suggest that pedophiles like Nickerson should be allowed to engage in simulated child pornography so they can stimulate themselves, theoretically preventing them from molesting actual children. The same "own it" mentality goes into the left's solution for every social ill: the war on drugs has failed, so let everyone have drugs; transgenders have a high rate of suicide, so let's celebrate transgenderism; get an STD or have an abortion, take pride in it; aroused by kids, indulge in simulated child ****.

The goal posts just keep moving. 

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/salon-pushes-****-sympathyagain
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21826



View Profile
« Reply #121 on: May 24, 2016, 01:03:11 am »

Obama’s gender ‘identity’ rules go beyond bathrooms, showers

President Obama’s edict requiring all public schools to open girls’ bathrooms, showers and other facilities to males who self-identify as female will lead to sexual chaos and confusion among children, critics predict.

Few media outlets are reporting the extent of the policy as described in the president’s new “guidelines” but once people find out there is likely to be backlash, says the author of a book critical of the theories of the late sexologist Alfred Kinsey and the Kinsey Institute, which have largely been adopted by public school sex-ed classes taught since the 1970s.

Dr. Judith Reisman, author of “Sexual Sabotage,” says the transgender agenda being pushed by the Obama administration is all coming down from the Kinsey Institute and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, or UNESCO.

As early as 2009, UNESCO was promoting Kinsey-supported teachings on child sexual development, offering a curriculum that encouraged parents to be supportive and open-minded to gender identity and sexual orientation. The curriculum discouraged parents from enforcing traditional gender identities, stating: “Confusion about these issues and fear of homosexuality (homophobia) has caused many parents and other adults to limit how girls and boys express themselves.”

Who is ‘transgender?’

Under Obama’s new rules, a male student does not have to be undergoing hormone treatment or surgeries to be considered “transgender.” Any boy can qualify by merely walking into the principal’s office at his school and declaring himself a girl.

What’s more, a student’s gender “identity” is considered “fluid,” so he could consider himself a boy one day and a girl the next. The burden is on the school to adapt and accommodate.

The fact that the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division signed the new guidelines along with the U.S. Department of Education sends a message to schools. Comply or be sued. The guidelines are riddled with words like “must” and “obligations” to fulfill federal Title IX requirements.

Title IX is a federal law passed by Congress and signed into law in 1972 by President Richard Nixon. It was meant to prevent discrimination against girls in any educational programs offered by schools that receive federal funding. But the law is now being rewritten by Obama to include a new class of protected individuals whose gender is “fluid” and changeable by the day or even the hour.

So far, eight states have vowed to ignore Obama’s guidelines. The governors of Texas, North Carolina, Mississippi, Kentucky, Arkansas, Alabama and Louisiana have urged schools to reject the order on the basis that it endangers pupils.

But the language is clear that the term “transgender” is defined as fluid and subject to change at any given moment.

The guidelines state:

    “The Departments interpret Title IX to require that when a student or the student’s parent or guardian, as appropriate, notifies the school administration that the student will assert a gender identity that differs from previous representations or records, the school will begin treating the student consistent with the student’s gender identity. Under Title IX, there is no medical diagnosis or treatment requirement that students must meet as a prerequisite to being treated consistent with their gender identity.”

This means that if a boy “identifies” as a girl, he must be treated as though he were a girl in all instances, even if he has no legal documents to prove he is a girl.

WND sent phone and email messages to the U.S. Department of Education Monday seeking clarification on whether a boy could walk into school in the morning and tell his principal he is a girl, then change back to a boy at lunch hour and become a girl during afternoon gym class. Media specialist David Thomas did not immediately respond to the question.

But the letter from the two federal agencies goes to great lengths to answer that question with the following statement:

    “Because transgender students often are unable to obtain identification documents that reflect their gender identity (e.g., due to restrictions imposed by state or local law in their place of birth or residence), requiring students to produce such identification documents in order to treat them consistent with their gender identity may violate Title IX when doing so has the practical effect of limiting or denying students equal access to an educational program or activity. A school’s Title IX obligation to ensure nondiscrimination on the basis of sex requires schools to provide transgender students equal access to educational programs and activities even in circumstances in which other students, parents, or community members raise objections or concerns.

    “As is consistently recognized in civil rights cases, the desire to accommodate others’ discomfort cannot justify a policy that singles out and disadvantages a particular class of students.”

‘They aim to wipe out all morality’

Reisman, a professor of law at Liberty University and author of the book “Sexual Sabotage,” said there is no end to the chaos the left has in store for American youth. She predicted more than 17 years ago that boys and girls would be taught to question their gender identity in U.S. public schools.

In her 1998 book, “Crimes and Consequences,” she wrote that schools were teaching children that they may be homosexual and they are just as likely to be bisexual. She said teachers and students nationwide were beginning to organize “Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgendered youth groups in schools nationwide.”

Many critics of her book said she was overreacting. Now she stands vindicated.

“They aim to wipe out all morality – whatever legal mechanisms that have protected the weak from the strong for thousands of years, to allow hypersexualizing all, expecting still normal folks to ‘get over it,'” Reisman told WND. “It will be all ages for sex and include no limitations. There are to be no boundaries or regulations with regard to sexual identity or behavior. Indoctrination of all, at least by kindergarten, that one’s sexuality is a fluid, changing construct.

“Young minds will be exploited, fearful, confused, leading to the inability to think critically, becoming beholden to the elite class (state) for knowledge and provision,” she added.

Right now the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) for 2014 identify “SCHOOL—ELEMENTARY/SECONDARY” as the third-most sexually dangerous/injurious environment for children.

She said Obama’s new “guidelines” for complying with Title IX will extend to college roommates, meaning a freshmen student entering university could get assigned to a dorm room with a transgender student of the same biological sex and would not be notified in advance of the situation.

Overnight sleeping arrangements for field trips and out-of-town sporting events will also be impacted.

“The administration is directing that for all intents and purposes, individuals are to be treated as the sex with which they identify regardless of biology, regardless of science, regardless of birth sex,” Reisman said. “If a man says he identifies as a woman he is to be treated as a women for housing, showers, bathrooms, sports participation.”

WND also asked the Department of Education spokesman if a boy would be able to participate on the girls shot-put team if he felt that he identified as a girl. No response was immediately given.

“If a boy identifies as a girl, he is to be permitted to room with girls on sports and extracurricular outings,” Reisman added. “This is an absolute end to equal rights for women.”

The Arcadia Unified School District case in California involved a middle-school girl who self-identified as a boy and was not allowed to room in a cabin with other boys during an overnight field trip. The school district required the girl/boy to spend the night in a separate cabin with her/his father. After a complaint was filed on the child’s behalf by the National Center for Lesbian Rights, the civil rights divisions of the U.S. Departments of Justice and Education agreed in 2013 this policy was discriminatory and a violation Title IX requirements. The school district was forced to rewrite its policy.

Where will this all end?

“It is hard to see an ending other than complete anarchy in terms of trying to educate children and young adults,” Reisman said.

And it’s already happening.

The NIBRS statistics reported that sex offenders 10 and under numbered 1,992 nationwide in 2014, while in the 11-15 age bracket there were 8,534 offenders and their victims 10 and under numbered 18,446 and 21,768, respectively. Children raping children.

“What we’re seeing is effective school sex education to train up child molesters,” Reisman said.

What’s next on left’s sexual agenda?

Next on the agenda of the far left is legalizing pedophilia, she predicts.

“In other words, to legalize sex between adults and children. This is already going on in the media, particularly in Salon.com, that has posted a couple of articles about pedophiles not being ‘monsters.’ There has been a longstanding effort on the part of pedophiles to normalize their deviancy – even renaming themselves ‘minor-attracted persons,'” Reisman said.

“They have been lobbying the American Psychological Association to change definitions,” she said. This effort has been spearheaded by Dr. Fred Berlin of Johns Hopkins University Medical School.

See Fox News interview with Judith Reisman on this topic below:

It was also reported Monday that Obama is threatening hospitals with the loss of federal funding if they refuse to provide sex-change operations. The new rule to the Affordable Care Act showed up last week on the Department of Health and Human Services website.

The final rule states that, under Title IX, any hospital receiving funding from HHS must “treat individuals consistent with their gender identity.” The rule provides no religious exemption.

Outrages against sanity’
Pastor, author, radio host Carl Gallups

Pastor, author, radio host Carl Gallups

“The outrages against sanity and sanctity will continue unchecked until rational, lucid, morally convicted people of power step forward and say, “Stop the insanity – now!” Until that moment comes, unabated evil will insist on overwhelming its victims,” says Carl Gallups, a radio host, author and Baptist minister in Florida.

“In the meantime, how will Obama and his federal sycophants reconcile the fact that a bevy of legal, scientific and medical professionals call the ludicrous and radical transgender ‘agenda’ a mental illness and a moral outrage?” said Gallups, author of “Be Thou Prepared” and “Final Warning,” both of which deal with matters of end-times biblical perspectives and the challenges faced by Christians.

Others such as Dr. Robert P. George, the McCormick professor of jurisprudence at Princeton University, have publicly questioned the science behind the transgender movement. George insists that the notion that a woman can be trapped inside a man’s body is ludicrous and superstitious, with no basis in medical fact.

The American College of Pediatricians also issued a recent statement that it “urges educators and legislators to reject all policies that condition children to accept as normal a life of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex. Facts – not ideology – determine reality. A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking. When an otherwise healthy biological boy believes he is a girl, or an otherwise healthy biological girl believes she is a boy, an objective psychological problem exists that lies in the mind not the body, and it should be treated as such.”

Gallups says suicide is also a major problem among transgenders.

“I am deeply concerned with the facts of a recent UCLA survey which indicated that a full 41 percent of trans or gender non-conforming people surveyed have attempted suicide,” he said.

“These statistics line up with Dr. Paul McHugh, former psychiatrist in chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital, and his piece in the Wall Street Journal stating that, ‘This intensely felt sense of being transgendered constitutes a mental disorder.’ After studying the effects of transgender surgery for over 10 years, Dr. McHugh says the results showed that the transgender ‘suicide mortality rose almost 20-fold above the comparable nontransgender population.’

“So, how can the federal government, and a morally bankrupt and runaway administration, legislate upon the entire population and its children what legal, scientific and medical professionals are calling a mental disorder?” Gallups says. “The answer is that they cannot legally do so – not without severe consequences.”

http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/obamas-gender-identity-rules-go-beyond-bathrooms-showers/
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #122 on: May 24, 2016, 01:21:00 am »

They've been pushing this even further back - that rock music guy who died recently (Prince) was very popular during my time as a young boy in the 80's. And there were other rock music people who played the roles of transgenders as well (ie, Boy George).

As you can see, the wars on our minds by spiritual wickedness in high places are SLOW AND GRADUAL conditioning.

Pretty much, Obama all but put the final nail in the coffin.
Report Spam   Logged
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21826



View Profile
« Reply #123 on: May 24, 2016, 02:29:25 am »

Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #124 on: May 24, 2016, 09:32:54 am »

They're already pushing this in the mainstream already?? No, I can't say I'm surprised - but nonetheless looks like, and sadly, they're doing so without shots being fired.

Sodomite marriage - dragged out for YEARS very bloodily

The transgender bathroom wars - a few wars, but significantly fewer shots being fired

Looks like the worse perversions will get pushed through without many knowing them, sadly.
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #125 on: June 01, 2016, 02:42:23 pm »

Video: https://www.yahoo.com/news/police-teacher-pregnant-13-old-153440544.html
6/1/16
Police: Teacher pregnant with 13-year-old student's child

Arrest warrant issued for Texas middle school teacher Alexandria Vera
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #126 on: July 03, 2016, 10:03:09 pm »

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/headlines/20160703-plano-senior-high-baseball-player-accused-of-sexual-assault-indecency-with-a-child.ece?hootPostID=cfebbe665c03ed01709c0120872edbb0
7/3/16
Plano Senior High athlete accused of sexually assaulting children he knew through mom's day care

A Plano Senior High School baseball player is accused of sexually assaulting two children he knew through a home day care run by his mother, police say.

Zachary Holifield, 17,  was arrested June 20 and remains in the Collin County Jail on $600,000 bail.

Jail records show he is charged with two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child and one count of indecency with a child by sexual contact.

David Tilley, a Plano police spokesman, said the charges relate to two children Holifield knew through the day care his mother operated out of her home.

Holifield, a rising senior at Plano Senior High, verbally committed to Oklahoma State University's baseball program in April, the recruiting website FieldLevel reported.

In a story by the Plano Star Courier last month, the teen was described as a top pitcher for the Wildcats.

more
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #127 on: July 20, 2016, 08:21:02 am »

http://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/news/garry-marshall-%e2%80%98pretty-woman%e2%80%99-director-and-creator-of-%e2%80%98happy-days%e2%80%99-dies-at-81/ar-BBuxnFp?ocid=spartandhp
Garry Marshall, ‘Pretty Woman’ Director and Creator of ‘Happy Days,’ Dies at 81
7/19/16

Garry Marshall, who created some of the 1970s’ most iconic sitcoms including “Happy Days,” “The Odd Couple,” “Laverne and Shirley” and “Mork and Mindy” and went on to direct hit movies including “Pretty Woman” and “The Princess Diaries,” died Tuesday. He was 81. The news was first reported by Access Hollywood.

Marshall’s first bigscreen blockbuster was 1990’s “Pretty Woman,” starring Julia Roberts as a highly idealized **** and Richard Gere as her client-cum-Prince Charming. The romantic comedy grossed $463 million worldwide. Roberts was Oscar nominated for best actress, the film was nominated for a Golden Globe for best comedy/musical — and Marshall scored a Cesar nomination as “Pretty Woman” drew a mention in the French awards’ foreign-film category.

In 1970 Marshall had a substantial hit when he developed and exec produced an adaptation of Neil Simon’s play “The Odd Couple” for ABC. The show drew several Emmy nominations for outstanding comedy series and wins for stars Jack Klugman and Tony Randall over the course of its five-season run. (In 2015 Marshall served as a consultant on a CBS remake of the series that starred Matthew Perry and Thomas Lennon.)

Marshall penned the 1971 pilot for “Happy Days,” which was recycled in 1972 as a segment of ABC’s comedy anthology series “Love, American Style” called “Love and the Happy Days.” George Lucas asked to view the pilot before deciding to cast Ron Howard, who starred in it, in “American Graffiti,” released in 1973.

“Happy Days” debuted as a series on the network in 1974, riding high on the wave of 1950s nostalgia generated in part by the success of “American Graffiti.”

During its peak, “Happy Days” was the No. 1 show on television during the 1976-77 season, No. 2 in 1977-78 and No. 4 the following year, and Henry Winkler’s the Fonz became a cultural touchstone, with his leather jacket eventually landing in the Smithsonian. Years later Marshall acknowledged being the one behind the idea, for a 1977 episode, of putting Fonzie on water skis — an idea so outlandish that it spawned the phrase “jumped the shark,” said in reference to a show that is clearly past its prime.

more
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #128 on: July 26, 2016, 10:56:33 am »

Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #129 on: July 29, 2016, 05:33:46 pm »

http://www.local10.com/news/crime/46-year-old-pastor-gets-10-year-old-girl-pregnant-police-say
46-year-old pastor gets 10-year-old girl pregnant, police say

Raymond Vincent appears in front of Broward County judge

By Andrea Torres - Digital Reporter/Producer , Derek Shore - Reporter

Posted: 10:09 PM, July 01, 2016

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. - When a 10-year-old girl ended up in the hospital with stomach pain, doctors learned she was pregnant.

Fort Lauderdale police detectives from the special victims unit met the girl at Broward Health Medical Center earlier this year.

The man accused of getting the pregnant, police said, was Raymond Vincent, a youth pastor who used to live in Fort Lauderdale.

U.S. marshals tracked Vincent, 46, to Haiti. They flew him from Port-au-Prince and turned him over to the Fort Lauderdale Police Department. A Broward County judge denied his bond in court Saturday morning.

Vincent had been accused of molesting a child in 2011. Police said he offered a girl food to lure her into his apartment. The girl said he molested her several times.

On Friday, Vincent faced one count of sexual battery on a child and one count of lewd and lascivious conduct. But authorities believe he could have abused other children during his time as a youth pastor in South Florida.
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #130 on: August 11, 2016, 06:35:42 am »

Disgraced Former US Rep. Mark Foley Spotted at Trump Rally
https://gma.yahoo.com/disgraced-former-us-rep-mark-foley-spotted-trump-074023929--abc-news-topstories.html
8/11/16

Former U.S. Rep. Mark Foley, who resigned from Congress in 2006 in disgrace after sending sexually explicit messages to teenage congressional pages, attended a rally for Donald Trump in Fort Lauderdale, Florida on Wednesday.

Foley, who could be seen in the background in videos and photos of the event, raised his hand when Trump asked if the people featured in the seats directly behind the stage knew him.

"[H]ow many of you people know me?" Trump asked, adding, "A lot of you people know me. When you get those seats, you sort of know the campaign."

A longtime Republican presidential campaign advance staffer described the seating area behind the candidate to ABC News as a "tapestry" -- a backdrop of people often chosen by the campaign to reflect wide-ranging support for the candidate.

Foley's appearance comes as Trump continues to bash Hillary Clinton after Seddique Mateen -- the father of Orlando shooter Omar Mateen -- attended her rally in Kissimmee, Florida on Monday.

The Clinton campaign said that they had no prior knowledge of Sedique Mateen's presence at the rally, calling it an "open-door event for the public," and later added the Clinton "disavows his support."

[T]he people behind me, they’re all on television," Trump told the crowd at BB&T Center. "They're gonna be famous. And by the way, speaking of that, wasn’t it terrible when the father of the animal that killed the wonderful people in Orlando was sitting with a big smile on his face right behind Hillary Clinton?"

Following the Trump gathering, Foley confirmed to MSNBC his support of Trump's presidential bid, and said that the two have a longstanding relationship. "[H]e’s been a friend of mine for 30 years and one of my biggest contributors," Foley said.

According to campaign contribution records compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, Trump gave at least $9,500 to Foley's political campaigns over a period of 10 years.
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #131 on: September 12, 2016, 03:30:29 pm »

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/12/world/robin-camp-****-comments-trnd/index.html
Judge to woman in **** case: 'Why couldn't you just keep your knees together?'
9/12/16

CNN)A judge in Canada is facing removal from the bench for his conduct when he asked a woman in a **** case why she couldn't "just keep [her] knees together."

Federal Court Judge Robin Camp is in the midst of a week-long judicial council hearing, which will determine whether he ought to be booted from his position.

The case in question took place in 2014 when Camp was a provincial court judge. (He became a Federal Judge last year.)

The 19-year-old woman said she was raped over a bathroom sink during a house party.

According to records of the trial, Camp asked her why she didn't "skew her pelvis" or push her bottom into the sink to avoid penetration. He openly wondered, "Why couldn't you just keep your knees together?"

On the subject of sex in general, and sex with young women in particular, he said, "Young wom[e]n want to have sex, particularly if they're drunk."
In a different part of the trial, he said "Some sex and pain sometimes go together...that's not necessarily a bad thing."

Camp, 64, ultimately acquitted the man charged with the crime, and then told him:

"I want you to tell your friends, your male friends, that they have to be far more gentle with women. They have to be far more patient. And they have to be very careful. To protect themselves, they have to be very careful."

The verdict was overturned on appeal. A new trial is scheduled for November.

'Minimal' knowledge of Canadian law
These and other moments from the trial led the Canadian Judicial Council to open its investigation.

Camp, the council said, "engaged in stereotypical or biased thinking in relation to a sexual assault complainant."

Testifying at the hearing Friday, Camp offered this defense for his comments: "a non-existent" knowledge of Canadian criminal law.

The South African-born judge said he didn't receive training on sex assault cases. In his legal career, he focused mostly on contract and bankruptcy cases, he said.

"My colleagues knew my knowledge of Canadian law was very minimal. It was non-existent," he said at the hearing Friday. "Please remember I wasn't in this country through the 1960s, '70s and '80s."

He also apologized to the woman for his comments, calling them "rude and insulting."

The scrutiny he's already faced
It hasn't taken a full two years for people to notice Camp's off-color comments. According to a Notice of Response from the judicial council, Camp has undergone sensitivity training and has apologized publicly several times.

"[Camp] has undergone counseling and training with [a] Superior Court Justice...with a psychologist... and with an expert on the law of sexual assault...with a view to interrogating his beliefs and improving his understanding of the law, the social context of sexual violence and the psychological impact of sexual assault," the notice reads.

After the hearing Monday, the panel will send its recommendation about Camp's future to the full Canadian Judicial Council.
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #132 on: October 11, 2016, 05:04:17 pm »

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/11/politics/ben-carson-donald-trump-tapes/index.html
10/11/16
Ben Carson on Donald Trump tapes: 'I've heard people talking like that'

(CNN)Ben Carson said Tuesday "of course" he's heard similar language from other people along the lines of the recently surfaced lewd and sexually aggressive comments from Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump.

"I've heard people talking like that. Of course. Are you kidding me?" the former Republican presidential candidate told CNN's Brianna Keilar. "As I was growing up, people were always trying to talk about their sexual conquests and trying to make themselves appear like Casanova."

Carson, who supports Trump, said that at the time they were recorded -- nearly 11 years ago -- the Republican presidential candidate was a "billionaire playboy," adding that he had personally heard people speaking in a similar manner about women in the past.

When Keilar said she had never heard such lewd comments made, Carson said: "Maybe that's the problem."

"Whether they've heard it or not, the issue is the train that's going off the cliff. We can come back after we save the country, after we save the country from going off the cliff," he said.

Carson said that conversation surrounding the leaked audio -- and accompanying media coverage -- were detracting voters from more pressing concerns, such as college debt and rising taxes.

Trump campaign co-chair: Trump made lewd comments before recent faith journey
With under a month remaining until Election Day, Carson said Trump must concentrate on leavening key issues and platforms, instead of responding to statements he made more than a decade ago.

"It's probably not what I would be concentrating on right now," Carson said. "The place where Donald Trump is going to win is on the issues. Why not concentrate on what two out of three Americans are concerned about? That's the direction of the country. That's one he can win easily."
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #133 on: October 14, 2016, 12:50:03 pm »

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-jr-women-who-cant-handle-harassment-should-teach-kindergarten/ar-AAiX2jo?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
10/14/16
Trump Jr.: Women Who 'Can't Handle' Harassment Should Teach Kindergarten

In a 2013 radio interview on the "The Opie and Anthony Show" surfaced by Buzzfeed News on Thursday, Donald Trump Jr. complains about women making charges of sexual harassment in the workplace, suggesting that women who have a trouble with men making certain comments should go teach kindergarten.

The comments came as Trump Jr. and the hosts were discussing whether women should be allowed at male-only golf courses.

“If you have a guys’ place you have a guys’ place," Trump Jr. said.

One of the hosts then lamented that women "complain" about "harassment."

"That’s why we hate having them around. They stop us from doing what we want to do," the host said.

Trump Jr. said that "in the club house, guys just want to be guys" and converse freely "even if you’re just talking s**t and it’s not really true."

One of the hosts then said that it's mostly "just bulls**tting around" and then suddenly human resources is intervening.

Trump Jr. then said, "I’m of that mindset — and I’ll get into trouble, I’m sure — I’ve been on this show enough, I’m sure I’ll get myself in trouble one of these days — but like, if you can’t handle some of the basic stuff that’s become a problem in the workforce today, like you don’t belong in the workforce. Like, you should go maybe teach kindergarten. I think it’s a respectable position."

"You can’t be negotiating billion-dollar deals if you can’t handle, like, you know...” Trump Jr. continued. “But listen — there’s a place where you have to draw the line — but today the stuff you get in trouble for…”

Listen to the clip at Buzzfeed News.

This article was written by Caitlin MacNeal from Talking Points Memo and was legally licensed through the NewsCred publisher network.
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #134 on: October 25, 2016, 12:48:27 pm »

Report Spam   Logged
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21826



View Profile
« Reply #135 on: November 16, 2016, 11:26:56 pm »

Gendersaurus Rex: Government Targets Preschoolers With Lessons on 'Sexuality, Queerness and Difference'

Scottish kids are being encouraged to explore "queerness" and question whether they are a boy or a girl, in a project paid for by taxpayers.

"Gendersaurus Rex" is an "artistic research project" exploring how "gender, feminism, sexuality, queerness and difference" can be incorporated into live performance for children.

It was commissioned by Imaginate, a performing arts group that is subsidized by the Scottish government and the European Union.

According to its website, Imaginate "works in partnership with schools, local authorities and Education Scotland to support pupils, teachers and other educators' creative development."

The project is being led by controversial performance artist Eilidh MacAskill, who believes that "patriarchy" and "heteronormativity" are "destroying children's lives." She works with children between the ages of 2 and 5.

In an article explaining Gendersaurus Rex, she states: "It's about making work that can speak directly to the gender-variant child, the queer child, the homosexual child, the cis-gendered child who might feel constrained by the expectations inherent in being a girl or a boy.

"It's about using the power of art as a place to question, subvert, hide from, muddy, invert and take refuge from the oppression of everyday life."

MacAskill argues that "the norm is patriarchal, sexist, white and body-conformist" and calls for "some diversity," complaining that there is a lack of "non-heteronormative lives in our children's theater."

She asks: "What do we mean by queer? How do we talk about queerness outside of sexuality? How do we talk about sexuality and children in the same breath without being accused of summoning the specter of pedophilia?"

On hearing about the project, one parent told the Daily Express: "The very idea that someone can access my child to put these ideas into their heads is frankly horrifying.

"I absolutely object to this, and the fact that the public is funding it is sickening."

The Scottish government denies that it is funding the project. However, the Imaginate website states that the Scottish government is one of its major funders.

http://www.charismanews.com/world/61320-gendersaurus-rex-government-targets-preschoolers-with-lessons-on-sexuality-queerness-and-difference
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21826



View Profile
« Reply #136 on: November 22, 2016, 05:48:41 pm »

Latest on scientist who mainstreamed pedophilia

Alfred Kinsey is known in the United States as the researcher who released the influential books on human sexual behavior in the 1940s and 1950s, regarded as catalysts for the sexual revolution.

The National Institutes of Health notes his studies as a college teacher on the gull wasp failed to earn him a desired promotion, so he jumped on a new academic pursuit of marriage and the family, titillating students with “the mechanics of intercourse” and teaching them that “nearly all so-called sexual perversions fall within the range of biological normality.”

Ultimately, he claimed that children, even infants, are sexual from birth and that the answer to what’s appropriate for human sexuality is just about anything. Even the left-leaning New York Times admitted author James Jones revealed Kinsey “had affairs with men, encouraged open marriages among his staff, stimulated himself with urethral insertion and ropes, and filmed sex in his attic.”

The truth about the man who has been called the “father of the sexual revolution” actually goes beyond that.

Judith Reisman, Ph.D., who long has researched Kinsey and his work, has announced that one of her books about Kinsey, “Stolen Honor Stolen Innocence,” is being published later this month in the French language.

It is being published by a pro-family organization in France that called out Kinsey’s work as “a weapon of mass destruction against the family.”

Her book, “Sexual Sabotage,” was published in Croatian in 2014, and another French group is planning to release that work in French in 2017.

Reisman is a scientific adviser to the California Protective Parents Association, former president of the Institute for Media Education and has consulted for four U.S. Department of Justice administrations. She also has worked with the U.S. Department of Education as well as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and has seen her work translated into many languages.

Her conclusion is that Kinsey almost assuredly violated children sexually and based his writings on the testimony of criminals who sexually assaulted children.

How else, she wonders, would anyone come up with the data in his infamous Table 34?

There, Kinsey claimed that an 11-month-old child experienced 10 orgasms in one hour, another 11-month-old had 14 in 38 minutes, a 2-year-old child had 11 in 65 minutes, a 4-year-old had 26 in 24 hours. A 10-year-old had 14 in the same time, and a 12-year-old had three in three minutes. Because someone wasn’t sure of those results, the experiment was repeated on the 12-year-old, who then reportedly experienced nine in two hours.

According to David Kupelian, author of “The Marketing of Evil,” Reisman found Table 34 “purports to be a scientific record of ‘multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males.'”

Wrote Kupelian: “Reisman wondered: How did Kinsey and his associates obtain this ‘research’ that infants as young as five months of age enjoyed sex? Child sexual abuse is a felony – how could such research be conducted legally? Why had nobody raised this issue before?”

Reisman herself explained: “Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad, to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for his alleged data on normal ‘child sexuality.’ Many of the crimes against children (oral and anal sodomy, genital intercourse and manual abuse) committed for Kinsey’s research are quantified in his own graphs and charts.”

In a commentary, Reisman and Mary McAlister wrote that the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University still is protecting Kinsey’s legacy, acting as a purveyor of his research, with the latest developments including reports the university was caught paying $200 for parts of aborted infants.

“This is the legacy of Alfred Kinsey,” they wrote. “While Kinsey’s work is lauded and quoted by the elites of American law and academia, other nations are beginning to understand Kinsey’s malevolent impact on the world’s people.”

Her work to expose Kinsey’s disturbing activities has included “Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences,” “Sexual Revolution” and “Stolen Honor, Stolen Innocence.”

And it’s making an impact. After she provided information in a trial, Croatia’s high court stunned sex-education experts by rejecting curriculum based on the work of Kinsey.

She had pointed out that Kinsey’s two books, known as the “Kinsey Reports,” were “based on a nonrepresentative group of Americans – including hundreds of sex offenders, prostitutes, prison inmates and exhibitionists.”

Reisman documents how some of Kinsey’s conclusions were based on data from serial pedophiles.

“Prisoners, prostitutes, homosexuals ‘1,400 sex offenders,’ ‘feeble minded’ and other such World War II ‘stay-at-home’ persons, rounded out the men who were to represent the average American.”

Explained Reisman: “Planned Parenthood (Margaret Sanger was a colleague) and legal power elitists joined arms to, as the French organization said, destroy the family, to merchandize and objectify women and children as products.

“That merchandizing is now coming full circle as unborn babies are divided and sold to the highest bidder at illustrious universities. This moral abyss has devolved naturally into live babies increasingly being sexual victimized by peers and pedophiles.”

She called on Congress to begin an investigation of Indiana University and its Kinsey Institute, and, if it is appropriate, to begin prosecutions.

“There still are victims, well over 80 years [old], willing to testify to their Kinsey-monitored child rapes, with cinema, to investigators. Such ‘scientific’ child sex abuse that reshaped law and public policy, should be at least as important as the sex abuse by Catholic clergy,” she wrote.

“The children of Table 34, and the millions of victims of the mantra, ‘children are sexual from birth’ finally deserve justice! We must at last know the truth of why and how we came to be a culture of adulterated adults, merchandisable children and exchangeable individuals. ”

Reisman has lectured at Princeton, Notre Dame, Georgetown, Pepperdine, Johns Hopkins, the FBI, the U.S. Air Force Academy, the University of Jerusalem, the University of Haifa and Tel Aviv University. She has been cited by the London Times, Time, Newsweek, the New York Times and the Washington Post. She has appeared on “Entertainment Tonight,” “Larry King Live,” “Donahue,” the “Today” show and “Crossfire.”

She’s been listed in “The World’s Who’s Who of Women.”

http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/latest-on-scientist-who-mainstreamed-pedophilia/
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21826



View Profile
« Reply #137 on: December 06, 2016, 04:46:52 pm »

Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime

Here is the left again trying to make something evil good.

THINK back to your first childhood crush. Maybe it was a classmate or a friend next door. Most likely, through school and into adulthood, your affections continued to focus on others in your approximate age group. But imagine if they did not.

By some estimates, 1 percent of the male population continues, long after puberty, to find themselves attracted to prepubescent children. These people are living with pedophilia, a sexual attraction to prepubescents that often constitutes a mental illness. Unfortunately, our laws are failing them and, consequently, ignoring opportunities to prevent child abuse.

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders defines pedophilia as an intense and recurrent sexual interest in prepubescent children, and a disorder if it causes a person “marked distress or interpersonal difficulty” or if the person acts on his interests. Yet our laws ignore pedophilia until after the commission of a sexual offense, emphasizing punishment, not prevention.

Part of this failure stems from the misconception that pedophilia is the same as child molestation. One can live with pedophilia and not act on it. Sites like Virtuous Pedophiles provide support for pedophiles who do not molest children and believe that sex with children is wrong. It is not that these individuals are “inactive” or “nonpracticing” pedophiles, but rather that pedophilia is a status and not an act. In fact, research shows, about half of all child molesters are not sexually attracted to their victims.

A second misconception is that pedophilia is a choice. Recent research, while often limited to sex offenders — because of the stigma of pedophilia — suggests that the disorder may have neurological origins. Pedophilia could result from a failure in the brain to identify which environmental stimuli should provoke a sexual response. M.R.I.s of sex offenders with pedophilia show fewer of the neural pathways known as white matter in their brains. Men with pedophilia are three times more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous, a finding that strongly suggests a neurological cause. Some findings also suggest that disturbances in neurodevelopment in utero or early childhood increase the risk of pedophilia. Studies have also shown that men with pedophilia have, on average, lower scores on tests of visual-spatial ability and verbal memory.

The Virtuous Pedophiles website is full of testimonials of people who vow never to touch a child and yet live in terror. They must hide their disorder from everyone they know — or risk losing educational and job opportunities, and face the prospect of harassment and even violence. Many feel isolated; some contemplate suicide. The psychologist Jesse Bering, author of “Perv: The Sexual Deviant in All of Us,” writes that people with pedophilia “aren’t living their lives in the closet; they’re eternally hunkered down in a panic room.”

While treatment cannot eliminate a ****’s sexual interests, a combination of cognitive-behavioral therapy and medication can help him to manage urges and avoid committing crimes.

But the reason we don’t know enough about effective treatment is because research has usually been limited to those who have committed crimes.

Our current law is inconsistent and irrational. For example, federal law and 20 states allow courts to issue a civil order committing a sex offender, particularly one with a diagnosis of pedophilia, to a mental health facility immediately after the completion of his sentence — under standards that are much more lax than for ordinary “civil commitment” for people with mental illness. And yet, when it comes to public policies that might help people with pedophilia to come forward and seek treatment before they offend, the law omits pedophilia from protection.

The Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibit discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals with mental disabilities, in areas such as employment, education and medical care. Congress, however, explicitly excluded pedophilia from protection under these two crucial laws.

It’s time to revisit these categorical exclusions. Without legal protection, a **** cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support. He could lose his job, and future job prospects, if he is seen at a group-therapy session, asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist, or requests a limit in his interaction with children. Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime.

There’s no question that the extension of civil rights protections to people with pedophilia must be weighed against the health and safety needs of others, especially kids. It stands to reason that a **** should not be hired as a grade-school teacher. But both the A.D.A. and the Rehabilitation Act contain exemptions for people who are “not otherwise qualified” for a job or who pose “a direct threat to the health and safety of others” that can’t be eliminated by a reasonable accommodation. (This is why employers don’t have to hire blind bus drivers or mentally unstable security guards.)

The direct-threat analysis rejects the idea that employers can rely on generalizations; they must assess the specific case and rely on evidence, not presuppositions. Those who worry that employers would be compelled to hire dangerous pedophiles should look to H.I.V. case law, where for years courts were highly conservative, erring on the side of finding a direct threat, even into the late 1990s, when medical authorities were in agreement that people with H.I.V. could work safely in, for example, food services.

Removing the pedophilia exclusion would not undermine criminal justice or its role in responding to child abuse. It would not make it easier, for example, for someone accused of child molestation to plead not guilty by reason of insanity.

A **** should be held responsible for his conduct — but not for the underlying attraction. Arguing for the rights of scorned and misunderstood groups is never popular, particularly when they are associated with real harm. But the fact that pedophilia is so despised is precisely why our responses to it, in criminal justice and mental health, have been so inconsistent and counterproductive. Acknowledging that pedophiles have a mental disorder, and removing the obstacles to their coming forward and seeking help, is not only the right thing to do, but it would also advance efforts to protect children from harm.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opinion/pedophilia-a-disorder-not-a-crime.html?_r=2
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #138 on: December 12, 2016, 02:17:28 am »

Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #139 on: March 20, 2017, 03:29:19 pm »

Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #140 on: April 28, 2017, 03:45:07 pm »

Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #141 on: June 14, 2017, 03:16:40 pm »

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2017/02/09/supreme-court-justice-ginsburg-favors-decriminalizing-pedophilia-and-child-sex-trafficking/
2/9/17
Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg favors decriminalizing pedophilia and child sex trafficking

Posted by Dr. Eowyn

The legal definition of “age of consent” is:

Age of consent refers to the legally defined age at which a person is no longer required to obtain parental consent to get married. It also refers to the age at which a person is held to have the capacity to voluntarily agree to sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse with a person under the age of consent may lead to criminal charges of statutory **** or sexual assault . . . .

Statutory **** is sex between an adult and a minor below the age of consent. Every state has a statutory **** law in some form. The age of consent varies from state to state, but is generally from 16 – 18 years of age. . . . Consent of the victim and belief that the victim is of the age of consent are usually considered immaterial.

A **** is an adult with “sexual fondness for and activity” with children, i.e., minors below the age of consent. Pedophilia is legally defined as sexual child abuse, i.e., any sexual activity with a minor below the age of consent, which includes fondling a child’s genitals, intercourse, incest, ****, sodomy, exhibitionism, and commercial exploitation of children through prostitution or the production of pornographic materials.

Since the age of consent in the United States which varies from state to state is from 16 to 18, lowering the age of consent to 12 would legalize pedophilia of children age 12 and above.

That is exactly what Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a Clinton appointee and daughter of Russian Jewish immigrants, recommends in a co-authored book that led to sweeping changes made by the federal government in the name of sex equality.

ruth-bader-ginsburg

In 1977 when Ginsburg was General Counsel of the ACLU, she co-authored (with Brenda Feigen-Fasteau) Sex Bias in the U.S. Code: A Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which was published by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in April 1977, for which Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau were paid with federal funds under Contract No. CR3AK010.
READ MORE White Professor Awarded $4.9M After Being Fired From Black College To Make It 'Blacker'

The source of the information and quotes from Sex Bias in the U.S. Code you’ll read below is Executive Director of Eagle Forum Susan Hirschmann’s Testimony Re. Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the Senate Judiciary Committee, July 23, 1993.

The 230-page Sex Bias in the U.S. Code identifies hundreds of federal laws alleged to discriminate against women and recommends an avalanche of government and social changes, including:

Military draft and combat duty for women.
Legalization of prostitution.
Sex integration of prisons, reformatories, schools and colleges and their activities (including sports), all-girls and all-boys organizations, and fraternities and sororities.
Changing the names of the Boy Scouts, Girls Scouts and Big Brothers of America to reflect sex integration.
Elimination of the traditional family concept of husband as breadwinner and wife as homemaker.
Comprehensive government child-care.
Adoption of sex-neutral language, e.g., “artificial” instead of “manmade”; “person, human” instead of “man, woman”; and plural nouns “they” and “them” instead of “singular third person pronouns”. At the same time, however, Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau hypocritically insist that the U.S. Department of Labor retains its “Women’s Bureau”.

Ginsburg wrote on p. 102 of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code:

Eliminate the phrase ‘carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife, who has not attained the age of 16 years’ and substitute a federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense . . . . A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, . . . [and] the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old.

Ginsburg (and her co-author) also recommends that the Mann Act be repealed. The Mann Act is a federal law passed in 1910 which makes it a felony to engage in interstate or foreign commerce transport of “any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose”.

From Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, pp. 98-99:

The Mann Act . . . poses the invasion of privacy issue in an acute form. The Mann Act also is offensive because of the image of women it perpetuates . . . . It was meant to protect from ‘the villainous interstate and international traffic in women and girls,’ ‘those women and girls who, if given a fair chance, would, in all human probability, have been good wives and mothers and useful citizens. . . .’

In other words, if Ruth Bader Ginsburg has her way, sexual abuse of children 12-years or older would not be a crime, nor would child sex trafficking.

Ginsburg will be 84 next month. May President Trump be given the opportunity to nominate her replacement on the Supreme Court.
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #142 on: June 15, 2017, 11:08:49 am »

Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #143 on: June 27, 2017, 04:43:33 pm »

http://www.neonnettle.com/features/975-british-pm-theresa-may-****-ring-cover-up-exposed
British PM Theresa May **** Ring Cover-up Exposed Prime Minister's ties to serial killer and pedophilia network revealed By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle on 11th June 2017 @ 10.53am theresa may s connections to an elite **** ring have been covered up © press Theresa May's connections to an Elite **** ring have been covered up. British Prime Minister Theresa May's connections to a serial killer and an Elite **** ring have been revealed after a sloppy cover-up has backfired. The PM has caused a lot of controversies in relation to pedophilia during her career, most notably, as her time as Home Secretary, she pushed for a change in legislation that would give more leniency to sex offenders. She backed a claim that pedophiles should be allowed to adopt children because it was "unfair" to stop them and a "breach of their human rights". One of the arguments for the change in the law was that although **** crimes were on the rise, the number of pedophiles that also murder children was "still quite low". Now, it appears, that May, or her people, have been covering up her family history, by removing any mention of her father from the internet. Rather than have the desired effect of whitewashing her unsavory connections, it's had the reverse effect and drawn attention to what has been hidden. All links relating to Theresa May's father, Hubert Brasier, have been deleted, including a Wikipedia page about his life. Of course, it's still possible to view archived versions of these web pages, and this has not only aroused suspicion but also prompted an investigation into what exactly has been covered up.

Read more at: http://www.neonnettle.com/features/975-british-pm-theresa-may-****-ring-cover-up-exposed
© Neon Nettle

Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #144 on: July 03, 2017, 10:19:38 am »

https://www.rt.com/viral/394916-virtual-reality-brides-japan/
‘Until a reboot do us part’: Japanese guys are marrying VR brides (VIDEO)
Published time: 1 Jul, 2017 13:44
Edited time: 2 Jul, 2017 12:37

The ‘couple’ exchange vows and gaze into each other's eyes via VR headset before engaging in a remarkably awkward first kiss as husband and wife in front of their equally 'real' wedding guests.

The concept stems from the anime video game 'Niitzuma Lovely x Cation' in which players can develop and foster relationships with virtual girlfriends.

For players in particularly committed relationships with their anime paramours, the game’s creators developed a way for the couples to be joined together in virtual matrimony.

No update as of yet on how the couple spent their first night as husband and wife. On a separate note, VR sex suits are now a thing.
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #145 on: July 05, 2017, 03:01:46 pm »

https://www.rt.com/uk/395372-sex-robots-lonely-elderly/
Sex robots could provide therapy and treat loneliness in care homes
Published time: 5 Jul, 2017 14:57

Elderly people living in care homes could soon be enjoying the company of specifically designed sex robots, according to a leading organization in the field.

The freakishly realistic robots could be widely available within the next decade, used not just by fetishists but as a tool for sexual therapy and communication.

The Foundation for Responsible Robotics (FRR) said although there are downsides to their use, the arrival of the sex machine is unstoppable.

“I can tell you that robots are certainly coming,” said Noel Sharkey, emeritus professor of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence at the University of Sheffield, and co-founder of the FRR.

“The concern is that this is going on [and] nobody is talking about it. People snigger about them, but they are actually shipping quite a lot and we are going to see them a lot more.”

Professor Sharkey, who was speaking on Wednesday at the launch of a new consultation report, said it is time for the government to step in and start regulating sex bots.

“They are being proposed for the elderly in care homes, which I think is controversial. If you have severe Alzheimer’s you can’t really tell the difference,” said the researcher.

“We need to think about as a society what we want to do about it.”

more
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #146 on: July 07, 2017, 01:21:37 pm »

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/07/06/new-report-considers-problems-arise-sex-robots/
7/6/17
New Report Considers The Problems That Could Arise From Sex Robots

A new report from the Foundation for Responsible Robotics considers the problems that could arise from sex robots, including social isolation, love, prostitution, and pedophilia.

“Would people have sex with a robot?,” “What kind of relationship could we have with a sex robot?,” “Will robot sex workers and bordellos be acceptable?,” “Will sex robots change societal perceptions of gender?,” “Could intimacy with robots lead to greater social isolation?,” “Could robots help with sexual healing and therapy?,” and “Would sex robots help to reduce sex crimes?” are all questions included in the 44-page report.

“In 2017 most liberal societies accept or tolerate sex in many different forms and varieties. Sex toys and **** aids have been used for centuries and can be easily purchased in stores in many countries. Now companies are developing robots for sexual gratification,” explain the foundation in their report. “But a robot designed for sex may have different impacts when compared with other sex aids. Those currently being developed are essentially pornographic representations of the human body – mostly female.”

Such representations combined with human anthropomorphism may lead many to perceive robots as a new ontological category that exists in a fantasy between the living and the inanimate. This is reinforced by robot manufacturers with an eye to the future. They understand the market importance of adding intimacy, companionship, and conversation to sexual gratification.

The aim of this consultation report is to present an objective summary of the issues and various opinions about what could be our most intimate association with technological artefacts. We do not contemplate or speculate about far future robots with personhood – that could have all manner of imagined properties. We focus instead on significant issues that we may have to deal with in the foreseeable future over the next 5 to 10 years.

On the topic of robot sex workers, the report claims, “While we have no direct evidence about the acceptability of sex robot bordellos, one poll suggests quite strongly that they would be acceptable,” before adding, “The additional repertoire offered by robots could well increase demand. Although we found no evidence for the notion that sex robots would stop sex trafficking, we found some evidence to the contrary.”

For the potential issue of social isolation, the foundation admits, “We have no direct evidence to answer this question and it would be considered unethical to set up controlled experiments.”

However, they also explained that the cited scholars in the report “are pretty much in agreement that sex with robots could or will lead to social isolation.”

“The reasons given varied,” they elaborated. “Spending time in a robot relationship could create an inability to form human friendships; robot don’t meet the species specific needs of humans; sex robots could desensitize humans to intimacy and empathy, which can only be developed through experiencing human interaction and mutual consenting relationships; real sexual relationships could become overwhelming because relations with robots are easier.”


On the issue of using robots for “sexual healing,” the foundation claims that “it is possible” the machines could “potentially help some people” with anxiety and other sexual issues, while the topic of using robots to stop sex crimes proved controversial.

Some of the cites sources claimed pedophiles and others with sexual disorders or aggressive desires could be stopped from enacting their fantasies in real life by using robots. However, others claimed it could encourage them further.
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #147 on: July 11, 2017, 01:47:58 pm »

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/youll-sickened-know-us-taxpayers-funding-child-****-epidemic-united-nations/
You’ll Be Sickened To Know How US Taxpayers Are Funding A Child **** Epidemic At The United Nations
On February 28, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres confirmed that UN peacekeepers and civilian staff faced 145 allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse impacting on 311 victims in 2016 alone. There are nearly 40 cases so far in 2017. Many of the victims, by the UN’s own admission, are children. As one 11-year-old child put it, “I didn’t have breasts yet, but he still raped me.” It is the one indefensible act. Child ****.

7/11/17

The United Nations, heavily subsidized by U.S. taxpayers’ dollars, has faced a widespread child sexual abuse problem for years and reacted with little more than silence.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Have you ever wondered why, after a disaster like a hurricane or a tsunami in a third-world or developing country, that so many “charitable organizations” like the UN and the Clinton Foundation rush to go there? It’s to help the victims, right? Wrong. It’s so they can go there and exploit them while they are helpless, with a special focus on the children. NTEB has spoken to numerous child sex trafficking prevention groups in Haiti who have told us that the main customers of child sex trafficking establishments are United States congressmen and senators. The United Nations “peacekeepers” are raping children around the world, and they are protected by the UN so they will never face trial. This is what YOUR tax dollars are funding. Just thought you’d like to know.

On February 28, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres confirmed that UN peacekeepers and civilian staff faced 145 allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse impacting on 311 victims in 2016 alone. There are nearly 40 cases so far in 2017. Many of the victims, by the UN’s own admission, are children.

As one 11-year-old child put it, “I didn’t have breasts yet, but he still raped me.” It is the one indefensible act. Child ****.

Even the UN recognises that these numbers, while huge, are likely to be the tip of the iceberg and represent only the crimes that have been reported, involving mainly just one part of the UN: Peacekeeping.
CAR: ‘Our children were raped by peacekeepers’

These numbers are a small proportion of the sex and child **** crimes committed by UN staff and peacekeepers over at least the last two decades.

Neither the sex scandals of the UN in the Bosnian War dramatized in the 2010 film Whistleblower nor the long-running “Food for Sex” scandals of the early 2000s. are covered in these figures. What is worse, decision makers have known this for years but have failed to crack down.

A Save the Children report over a decade ago found abuse at all age levels “from 8 to 18,” though the victims older than twelve were identified as being “regularly involved in ‘selling sex.’” The Save report went on to say that, among the children interviewed, “all of the respondents clearly stated that they felt that the scale of the problem affected over half of the girls in their locations.”

The outbreak of such heinous activity at the UN highlights just how vulnerable the victims are. Faced with legal safeguards in the United States and Western countries, evil men have found that it is easy to gain access to children in developing countries. People in power know this, so much so that since 1999 authorities have warned that problem of paedophiles in the aid world is on a level with sex tourism.
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #148 on: July 16, 2017, 03:00:51 pm »

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/07/15/teen-vogues-tutorial-anal-sex-omits-serious-risks/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+breitbart+%28Breitbart+News%29
Teen Vogue’s ‘Tutorial’ on Anal Sex Omits Serious Risks
7/15/17

Teen Vogue recently continued its agenda-driven mission with a new “tutorial” for its young readers on how to have anal sex.

The publication featured an article by “sex educator” Gigi Engle titled “Anal Sex: What You Need to Know,” and, apparently, Engle, who touts on her Facebook account that she is a “writer, sex expert, and speaker,” and Teen Vogue do not think young girls considering anal sex “need to know” the serious dangers and risks associated with the activity:

 

Ironically, Engle begins her “tutorial” with the statement, “When it comes to your body, it’s important that you have the facts. Being in the dark is not doing your sexual health or self-understanding any favors.”

“This is anal 101, for teens, beginners, and all inquisitive folk,” she nevertheless plunges ahead, defending anal sex as “a perfectly natural way to engage in sexual activity.”

Though Engle asserts, “Enthusiastic consent is necessary for both parties to enjoy” anal sex, the reality is that many of Teen Vogue’s readers are under the age of consent.

And while she does provide the perfunctory warning to her teen students that condoms will help to protect against sexually transmitted infections, Engle spends much more time teaching them which lube to use and how to insert sex toys into their butts to “warm [themselves] up” for “larger objects.”

Engle acknowledges to her young students who might be grossed out at the thought of coming into contact with someone else’s “poop” that, yes, “you will come in contact with some fecal matter,” but she then wags her finger at any teen who has a problem with that.

“You are entering a butthole,” she writes. “It is where poop comes out. Expecting to do anal play and see zero poop isn’t particularly realistic. It’s NOT a big deal. Everyone poops. Everyone has a butt.”

The fact is, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states, “Anal sex is the riskiest sexual behavior for getting and transmitting HIV for men and women.”

The CDC continues:

    Being a receptive partner during anal sex is the highest-risk sexual activity for getting HIV. The bottom’s risk of getting HIV is very high because the lining of the rectum is thin and may allow HIV to enter the body during anal sex.

    The insertive partner is also at risk for getting HIV during anal sex. HIV may enter the top partner’s body through the opening at the tip of the **** (or urethra) or through small cuts, scratches, or open sores on the ****.

The agency also warns against the dangers of contracting other sexually transmitted diseases, such as chlamydia and gonorrhea, through anal sex, in addition to hepatitis A, B, and C, parasites and intestinal amoebas, and bacterial infections through contact with feces.

Engle’s piece set off a firestorm:

One outraged “activist mommy” received more than one million views to her video posted on Facebook that urged Teen Vogue to be pulled from supermarkets and convenience stores.

The U.K.’s Independent takes a feminist view of the controversial piece, arguing that, in defining her anal sex partners as “prostate owners” and “non-prostate owners,” Engle is actually forcing women to still be defined by their relationship to men.

The Independent observes that missing from Engle’s “non-prostate owner” anatomy picture presented in her article is a critical part of female sexual anatomy: the clitoris:

    What is this teaching the audience of a magazine aimed at teenage girls? It tells them their identity is not “woman”, but rather “non-man”. It tells them that should they consent to anal sex, their body is just a hole for the man to penetrate, and the part of their body that is most sensitive and reliable for the female orgasm is so irrelevant that it doesn’t even warrant a label. It tells them that consenting to anal sex is not about their pleasure, but about their partner’s.

“Teen Vogue’s target audience is not non-prostate owners seeking to provide sexual satisfaction to men through their anus,” the Independent also states. “Teen Vogue’s target audience is teenage girls, most under the legal age of consent, who are deserving of adult women to teach them to value themselves for who they are, not by what they are in relation to men.”

The publication – which at one time was focused on fashions, makeup tips, and celebrities – now is a mouthpiece for the radical feminist and LGBT movements and the abortion industry, as well as an activist arm of the anti-Trump agenda.

“I think the readers that we reach would all consider themselves activists, too,” said Teen Vogue editor Elaine Welteroth in an interview with the Guardian in February.

Digital director Phillip Picardi runs the bulk of Teen Vogue’s political content, which, according to the Guardian, “has come to play a key role in repositioning the title as a passionate and informed, if unexpected, voice for the resistance.”

Picardi defended the anal sex piece on Twitter:

    But until queer sex, love, and families are included in education, we're doing a dangerous and potentially lethal disservice…

    — Phillip Picardi (@pfpicardi) July 14, 2017

    to a growing population. Gen Z will be our queerest and most fearless generation yet.

    — Phillip Picardi (@pfpicardi) July 14, 2017
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #149 on: August 14, 2017, 02:04:54 pm »

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2017/08/08/primary-school-****-epidemic-sees-children-young-five-expelled/
8/8/17

Primary school **** epidemic sees children as young as five being expelled, NSPCC warns

Thousands of pupils have been either permanently or temporarily excluded over the past four years for sexual misdemeanors

9 August 2017 • 12:01am

An epidemic of pornography is sweeping through Britain's schools with children as young as five being expelled for sexual misconduct.

Thousands of pupils have been either permanently or temporarily excluded over the past four years for sexual misdemeanours including watching pornography or sharing indecent images, according to figures obtained by the Press Association.

The figures, from local councils, do not include those where children were victims of staff or adult volunteers.

Data released by the Department for Education (DfE) showed more than 800 primary school children have been excluded for "sexual misconduct" since 2013. The number for senior school students, over the same period of time, was 8,000.

Charities warned that schools should prevent "harmful sexual behaviour" among children by teaching them about consent.

An NSPCC spokesman said: "Preventing harmful sexual behaviour through proper, up-to-date sex and relationships education is immeasurably better than excluding children after the harm has been done.

"By giving children the right information … we can teach them how to treat others and how to know when something is not right."

The spokesman said that the school curriculum should be updated to teach children about the dangers of sexting and online ****.

"Social media, sexting, online **** and dating apps did not exist when sex education was introduced on the curriculum a generation ago," they said.

"It must be dragged into the 21st century, it must be consistent, and it must be offered in every school."

Schools said children could be censured under the term "sexual misconduct" for a range of issues, including sexual abuse, assault, bullying, graffiti, harassment, and lewd behaviour.

Other examples included holding, distributing or requesting indecent images, accessing internet pornography, and sexual misconduct on social media.

Sarah Green, co-director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, said the figures were "alarming".

"These figures show that girls and boys are being failed by those who should protect them," she said.

Javed Khan, chief executive at the children's charity Barnardo's said that often children who sexually harm others have experienced some form of sexual abuse and trauma.

"They need specialist support to help them recover and understand why their behaviour is harmful," he said.

A DfE spokesman said: "Sexual assault of any kind is an offence. Schools should be safe places and we issue safeguarding guidance to protect pupil welfare."
Report Spam   Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
Free SMF Hosting - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy