End Times and Current Events
March 18, 2024, 11:10:43 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: "Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me." John 5:39 (KJB)
 
  Home Help Search Gallery Staff List Login Register  

The-Kinsey-Syndrome

Shoutbox
December 31, 2022, 10:08:58 am NilsFor1611 says: blessings
August 08, 2018, 02:38:10 am suzytr says: Hello, any good churches in the Sacto, CA area, also looking in Reno NV, thanks in advance and God Bless you Smiley
January 29, 2018, 01:21:57 am Christian40 says: It will be interesting to see what happens this year Israel being 70 years as a modern nation may 14 2018
October 17, 2017, 01:25:20 am Christian40 says: It is good to type Mark is here again!  Smiley
October 16, 2017, 03:28:18 am Christian40 says: anyone else thinking that time is accelerating now? it seems im doing days in shorter time now is time being affected in some way?
September 24, 2017, 10:45:16 pm Psalm 51:17 says: The specific rule pertaining to the national anthem is found on pages A62-63 of the league rulebook. It states: “The National Anthem must be played prior to every NFL game, and all players must be on the sideline for the National Anthem. “During the National Anthem, players on the field and bench area should stand at attention, face the flag, hold helmets in their left hand, and refrain from talking. The home team should ensure that the American flag is in good condition. It should be pointed out to players and coaches that we continue to be judged by the public in this area of respect for the flag and our country. Failure to be on the field by the start of the National Anthem may result in discipline, such as fines, suspensions, and/or the forfeiture of draft choice(s) for violations of the above, including first offenses.”
September 20, 2017, 04:32:32 am Christian40 says: "The most popular Hepatitis B vaccine is nothing short of a witch’s brew including aluminum, formaldehyde, yeast, amino acids, and soy. Aluminum is a known neurotoxin that destroys cellular metabolism and function. Hundreds of studies link to the ravaging effects of aluminum. The other proteins and formaldehyde serve to activate the immune system and open up the blood-brain barrier. This is NOT a good thing."
http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-08-11-new-fda-approved-hepatitis-b-vaccine-found-to-increase-heart-attack-risk-by-700.html
September 19, 2017, 03:59:21 am Christian40 says: bbc international did a video about there street preaching they are good witnesses
September 14, 2017, 08:06:04 am Psalm 51:17 says: bro Mark Hunter on YT has some good, edifying stuff too.
September 14, 2017, 04:31:26 am Christian40 says: i have thought that i'm reaping from past sins then my life has been impacted in ways from having non believers in my ancestry.
View Shout History
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The-Kinsey-Syndrome  (Read 19906 times)
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #60 on: June 01, 2014, 02:35:45 pm »

Looked up sodomy in the 1828 Webster's yesterday - the only definition it gives is crimes against nature. Then I looked up nature in that same dictionary, and it pretty much summed up how it means God's creation.

Pt being that when you look at the WHOLE picture - yes, same-sex marriage is the most abominable of all sins - however, is alot of this other stuff going on like divorce, fornication, having children out of wedlock, abortion, stem-cell research, doctor-assisted suicide, feminism(ie-pushing women to have careers in the workforce), polygamy, and birth control part of God's creation(and purpose for his creation)? No! Absolutely NOT!

Ultimately, marvel ye not that fast-forward to our present day, same-sex marriage is getting legalized and accepted in today's society, why? B/c look at all the seeds of sodomy that were planted for many years - Wescott and Hort 1881, Susan B. Anthony's first wave of feminism(she hated abortion et al, but she also hated Christianity), NIV in the 70's which was also the same decade abortion got legalized, feminism in the 70's, etc.

And speaking of these perverted bible versions - yes, this IS a form of sodomy too that's played a big role. For example, look how these perversions watered down the role of the man in them.
Report Spam   Logged
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #61 on: June 07, 2014, 05:45:05 am »

Today’s Summer Camps Train Boys Under The Age Of 10 How
To Become Great Transsexuals


Do you have a young male child who occasionally walks around in heels and plays with a barbie doll from time to time? You need to send him to a special summer camp to have him trained to be homosexual. No… this is not a joke. Unfortunately, it’s the real deal. Over the past three years, photographer Lindsay Morris has been documenting a four-day camp for gender nonconforming boys and their parents. The camp, “You Are You” (the name has been changed to protect the privacy of the children and is also the name of Morris’ series), is for “Parents who don’t have a gender-confirming 3-year-old who wants to wear high heels and prefers to go down the pink aisle in K-Mart and not that nasty dark boys’ aisle,” Morris said with a laugh. It is also a place for both parents and children to feel protected in an environment that encourages free expression.

http://www.libertynews.com/2014/06/umm-what-special-summer-camp-actually-trains-boys-under-age-of-10-to-become-homosexual/
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #62 on: June 12, 2014, 07:38:02 am »

Shock Video Catches Planned Parenthood Teaching Teens S&M Sex: Gagging, Whipping and Asphyxiation

A shocking new video Live Action released today catches the Planned Parenthood abortion business teaching teenagers about S&M-based sexual relationships and concepts such as gagging, whipping and asphyxiation.

In a series of undercover audits, Live Action investigators documented Planned Parenthood counselors and nurses advising our investigators, who the Planned Parenthood staffers thought were minors, on how to practice torture sex.

In the videos, Planned Parenthood counselors encourage undercover investigators posting as 15 and 16-year-old teens, to engage in the sadomasochistic practices, telling the underage teens  “if it’s consensual, it’s OK… it’s totally OK.”

“What we’re about to release shows a systemic, institutional problem in America’s largest abortion corporation,” Lila Rose, Live Action’s president, stated. “It’s not a matter of ‘don’t judge,’ but rather explicit endorsement of violent and harmful sexual practices to boys and girls as young as fifteen years old.”

plannedparenthoodexposeThe group complains: “Planned Parenthood consistently fights any law requiring parental consent or involvement for minors seeking sexual and reproductive health care, including abortions.  PP’s website encourages teens to circumvent their parents and the law.”

“Taxpayers, and especially parents, need to know where their money is going,” Rose said.  “This funding is not optional – it’s a compulsory, government-enforced extraction going toward extremely questionable programs and dangerous advice for our nation’s teens.”

Rose expects Live Action’s upcoming investigative releases to serve as “a wake-up call for America’s parents.”  “This is not a partisan issue.  Whether people are liberal or conservative, or even whether they’re pro-life or pro-choice, I think we’re going to see a lot of common ground in the outrage over what we’re about to show people.”

The following is the trailer video previewing the series of expose’ videos that are forthcoming:



Live Action continues:

    Planned Parenthood of Hudson Peconic sponsored a training seminar, designed for educators of teenagers, titled “50 Shades of Safe.”  The seminar offered workshops/classes on “how a BDSM relationship is successfully navigated between sexual partners” and on the “elements of a healthy BDSM relationship.”

    The official Planned Parenthood website lists BD (bondage and discipline) and SM (sadomasochism) under its Sex & Sexuality – “Understanding Sexual Activity — at a Glance” page without any warnings or safety objections: “Here are plannedparenthood73some examples of less common sexual behaviors: SM (sadomasochism) — the use of domination and/or pain for sexual arousal.  BD (bondage and discipline) — sexual role play that includes elements of SM.”

    Planned Parenthood receives over $500 million a year from taxpayers, in the name of so-called sex education and health. Furthermore, under ObamaCare, Planned Parenthood has announced that it will receive undisclosed funds through the $75-million-a-year PREP (Personal Responsibility and Education Program), with 15 affiliates already having received grants.

    Planned Parenthood’s stance on what kind of sexual activity is good or not: “Just because a sexual behavior isn’t common or some people disapprove of it or the reasons people enjoy it, doesn’t mean there is anything wrong with it. Many people enjoy less common kinds of sex, but they are often less likely to discuss it with others. One way to think about uncommon kinds of sex is this: if no one is hurt by the kind of sex someone might enjoy, than [sic] it is probably okay.”

    Planned Parenthood equates unrestricted sexual activity with “freedom, equality and dignity” according to their “Declaration of Sexual Rights.” Abortions and hormone drugs are listed as entitlements that contribute to “the freedom, equality and dignity of all people” – including teens and children.

    Planned Parenthood covers up the sexual abuse of young girls by offering them clandestine sexual and reproductive health care, including abortions, and coaching these young ladies on how to keep the activity secret from their parents.

http://www.lifenews.com/2014/06/10/shock-video-catches-planned-parenthood-teaching-teens-sm-sex-gagging-whipping-and-asphyxiation/
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #63 on: June 12, 2014, 07:32:08 pm »

Wow...and I thought this garbage only goes on in one of those forbidden cable channels! Shocked
Report Spam   Logged
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #64 on: October 18, 2014, 07:57:17 am »

Pedophilia Deserves Civil Rights, Says New York Times’ Op-Ed

The nation’s tough anti-pedophilia laws are unfair to pedophiles, according to an op-ed published by The New York Times’ editors.

“One can live with pedophilia and not act on it,” says Margo Kaplan, an entrepreneurial assistant law professor at Rutgers University, and a former lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union.

Tragically, the roughly 1 percent of “people who are sexually attracted to children] must hide their disorder from everyone they know — or risk losing educational and job opportunities, and face the prospect of harassment and even violence,” she wrote.

Kaplan is trying to make a legal career in the regulation of expanding sexual diversity, instead of routine and lower-status practice areas, such as torts, probate, crime or copyrights. She’s focused on “legal limitations on intimate decisions, particularly the use of criminal law in areas of health and sexuality,” according to her web page.

Kaplan says criminal law should be changed so that pedophiles are only stigmatized or denied jobs if law school graduates agree that they pose a “direct threat” to children.

That could be a bonanza for law school graduates, because they’d be paid to argue over whether the hiring of a particular **** for a particular job is a direct threat to particular children. “The direct-threat analysis rejects the idea that [prospective] employers can rely on generalizations; they must assess the specific case and rely on evidence, not presuppositions,” Kaplan writes.

But this shift would also be a loss for the 99 percent of non-**** American citizens and voters, because it would eliminate their longstanding civil right to simply and cheaply exclude pedophiles from mainstream society or from jobs near children.

That right would be handed over to the hourly-paid law school graduates, including judges, defense lawyers, arbitrators and prosecutors, if Kaplan’s career plan becomes law.

The readers’ comments about the article were generally negative.

“Once you give pedophiles legal protection as handicapped individuals, it will become too difficult to keep them from jobs in which they might come into contact with children,” said the top-ranked comment on Kaplan’s article.

“No one who has dealt with these laws in real life would suppose that such evidence is easy to establish or that it provides sufficient protection to employers, who have to consider both the vagaries of the legal system and the costs of legal action,” said commenter Josh Hill.

“I’m beginning to wonder if there is a quiet but persistent movement to normalize adult sexual contact with children,” said an anonymous commenter, Hypatia. “Trying to turn the basest of predators into victims… is repugnant to anyone with even the slightest exposure to the damage done to the victims of this toxicity.”

“When you start to say it is not a crime, when you start to sympathize with people because they can’t control perverse desires, you give them an excuse to justify their behavior,” said commenter DougalE.

But “they need to be shamed and need to be made to fear prison time… zero tolerance, tough love, and long prison terms serve to protect children and when you begin to remove, compromise or weaken those attitudes it will only serve to endanger more children,” he wrote.

Unsurprisingly, Kaplan is eager to advance what she regards as the noble new task of wiping out Americans’ ability and civil right to protect their kids from pedophiles. “The fact that pedophilia is so despised is precisely why our responses to it, in criminal justice and mental health, have been so inconsistent and counterproductive,” she wrote.

“Acknowledging that pedophiles have a mental disorder, and removing the obstacles to their coming forward and seeking help, is not only the right thing to do, but it would also advance efforts to protect children from harm,” she insisted, without providing evidence.

In the 1970s, the Catholic Church accepted the advice of many experts in the new mental-health industry, and concluded that **** priests could be successfully treated with private therapy. The theory was not proven correct, and it helped protect many priests as they sexually abused thousands of boys.

That was a disaster for many children and for the church, but it yielded a bonanza of lawsuits, media stories and therapy sessions for professional lawyers, reporters and psychologists.

Kaplan’s new plan could also be good for many New York Times’ readers, who include a greater-than-average number of post-grad lawyers, law-school professors, social workers, regulators, psychologists, judges, expert witnesses and therapists. Many would gain more money and social status if they — not ordinary Americans — can monopolize the inevitable disagreements between pedophiles, their lawyers, employers, victims, parents, and community members.

Kaplan is ready for that burden.

“Arguing for the rights of scorned and misunderstood groups is never popular, particularly when they are associated with real harm,” said Kaplan, whose career likely has been boosted by The New Times Times’ decision to publish and showcase her career plan.

http://dailycaller.com/2014/10/06/pedophilia-deserves-civil-rights-says-new-york-times-op-ed/
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #65 on: October 18, 2014, 07:58:04 am »

Gene of the week: paedophilia

Add paedophilia to the growing list of genetically-determined attractions, preferences and predispositions. In a New York Times op-ed, a law professor from Rutgers University contends that paedophilia is not a matter of choice. Margo Kaplan writes that:

    “Recent research, while often limited to sex offenders — because of the stigma of pedophilia — suggests that the disorder may have neurological origins. Pedophilia could result from a failure in the brain to identify which environmental stimuli should provoke a sexual response. MRIs of sex offenders with pedophilia show fewer of the neural pathways known as white matter in their brains. Men with pedophilia are three times more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous, a finding that strongly suggests a neurological cause. Some findings also suggest that disturbances in neurodevelopment in utero or early childhood increase the risk of pedophilia.”

Ms Kaplan admits that paedophiles do not have to succumb to their urges, so they are still responsible for their actions. However, they do have an unrecognised disability. She is campaigning to amend US legislation so that they will not be discriminated against in employment, education and medical care.

    “The Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibit discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals with mental disabilities, in areas such as employment, education and medical care. Congress, however, explicitly excluded pedophilia from protection under these two crucial laws.”

“It’s time to revisit these categorical exclusions,” she concludes.

http://www.bioedge.org/index.php/bioethics/bioethics_article/11170
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #66 on: October 18, 2014, 08:00:34 am »

That has to be the sickest way to make a buck. To even consider allowing pedo's around kids so she can make money. She is the worst kind of person. But that is what demon possessed liberals are..
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #67 on: October 18, 2014, 10:32:44 pm »

That has to be the sickest way to make a buck. To even consider allowing pedo's around kids so she can make money. She is the worst kind of person. But that is what demon possessed liberals are..

Hate to say it - but the seeds for this were planted many years ago when this country started showing tolerance toward co-habitation outside of marriage. Way back in the 80's when I was a kid - they started pushing this idea with buzzphrases like "The shoe needs to fit first...". Uhm...it only takes like a couple of seconds to try on a shoe at a shoestore. Roll Eyes

Pt being that fornication has really runned rampant, and it's come to a point where this has became completely acceptable(and even encouraged) in today's society. When one abomination breeds, MORE will follow. When one group wants their "rights", MORE "groups" will demand their's.
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #68 on: November 15, 2014, 07:37:02 pm »

http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2014/11/15/7225319/jimmy-graham-fans-superdome-new-orleans-saints
11/15/14
Jimmy Graham got tired of being groped by fans



New Orleans Saints tight end Jimmy Graham is one of the most prolific players in the game. When scoring a touchdown at home last week against the San Francisco 49ers, Graham shared his enthusiasm by vaulting into the crowd, Lambeau Leap-style. Unfortunately, those days have apparently come to a quick end, after Graham was groped by a fan, per Mike Triplett of ESPN.

Graham was famous for dunking the ball over the crossbar after touchdowns, but that move was outlawed by the NFL before this season. Leaving him with a bevy of other options including the good-old-fashioned-but-chronically-underrated spike, Graham decided to become one with the fans until a man by the name of Scott McGowan, dressed in the guise of a joker, took things a bit too far.

This goes out as a lesson to all fans everywhere. You can like your team, you can love the players, but you can't go grabbing their backside because of that love.

"I just wanted to go and thank all the fans for being there," Graham said. "But people were trying to thank me a little too much."

Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #69 on: December 03, 2014, 06:54:01 pm »

http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/the_ambiguous_legacy_of_the_pill
12/3/14
The ambiguous legacy of The Pill
Contraceptives didn’t solve all of women’s problems. In fact, they created whole series of new ones.


I am in the process of writing a book which argues that the Sexual Revolution has been a rich person’s hobby horse from the beginning. The rich and powerful like the idea of separating sex from child-bearing. While this idea is sometimes wrapped up in a disguise of helping woman and the poor, the fact remains that the rich and powerful pioneered and implemented these ideas, quite often at the expense of women and the poor.

So I wondered, when I picked up a book, The Birth of the Pill: How Four Crusaders Reinvented Sex and Launched a Revolution, celebrating four key people behind the development of the Pill, whether I would have to revise my thesis.

I am sorry to say that not a single line in this book contradicts my thesis. Oddly enough, however, the author believes he has written an account that more or less celebrates these four people, Margaret Sanger, Dr Gregory Pincus, Dr John Rock and Katherine McCormack, as social heroes. He has not falsified or white-washed the story in any way that I can see. The evidence is right in front of him. But he does not see it.

The two women, Sanger and McCormack, were both eugenicists. Without Mrs McCormack’s fortune supporting the research: no Pill. Without Mrs Sanger’s ideological drive for her own peculiar combination of free love and eugenics, no Pill. Without Dr Pincus’ combination of bravado and brilliance, no Pill. Without Dr Rock’s respectability and frankly, his Catholicism, to allay public fears about the decline in morality that it might cause: no Pill.

That Mr. Eig does not see the elitism that made The Pill possible, is a tribute to the power of the regime in which we all now live.

People frequently misunderstand the full impact of the ideological regime which The Pill made plausible. People will sometimes say, “If you don’t approve of contraception, you don’t have to use it.” Or, “if you don’t approve of abortion, don’t get one.”

The misunderstanding behind these statements is to confuse an individual’s choice of behavior within a regime, with the choice of regime itself. We are all living in the Sexual Revolutionary Regime, whether we like it or not, whether we approve of it or not, whether we decline to participate in its main tenets or not. We all live in a society that is trying to say that sex is intrinsically a sterile activity, with all that this implies.

Part of living within a regime, is that one takes it for granted. These are the background assumptions, the parameters of our lives. Certain things make sense within the regime that would be unimaginable under an alternative regime. 

The cardinal tenet of the Contraceptive Regime is that The Pill safely sterilizes the sexual act. As a result of this belief, we accept the idea that we can have sex with anyone we want, without regard for potential consequences. We think we can have sex with a person who would be a disaster to parent with. And when the inevitable pregnancy actually occurs, we act surprised every time. Women are then faced with the choice of becoming a single mother, having an abortion or placing the baby for adoption. None of these choices is particularly good for the child, nor in the end, for the woman.

We accept as normal, adults leaving one sex partner for another, and leaving children behind in the process. It is unbelievably painful for the individuals involved, but as a society, we don’t much care. Each individual family is left to believe that their painful situation is somehow their own fault. “If I had used my contraception correctly, I wouldn’t have gotten pregnant.”  “If you had been more mature and less sexually possessive, I could have had my affair without all this turmoil and trouble.”


Non-marital childbearing, “multiple-partner fertility,” abortion, divorce, are all part of the price of The Pill. But a celebration of the Sexual Revolution and The Pill cannot afford to take too much notice of these connections.

We can think of our perceptions of The Pill as being like one of those drawings that is either a goblet or a pair of faces, depending on your perspective. If you let your gaze shift ever so slightly, you can see the other image.

Poor Mr Eig’s gaze is so fixed upon the goblet that does not see the human faces. He does not see the significance of much of what he is saying. He tells us about Hugh Hefner’s enthusiasm for The Pill, without quite recognizing that this is the man who mainstreamed the commercialization of women’s sexual availability.

He tells us about the shoddy testing of the Pill which was conducted largely on Puerto Rican women, and on women in a mental asylum. When Dr Pincus applied for FDA approval, the drug had been tested on only 130 women. Instead of describing the number of women tested, he computed the number of menstrual cycles during which no pregnancy occurred. Eig recognizes that this was a sleight of hand, but hey, it was all in a good cause. Dr Pincus reported, “In the 1,279 cycles during which the regime of treatment was meticulously followed, there was not a single pregnancy.” This procedure had the virtue of dodging the number of women who dropped out and why, as well as the number of pregnancies that did occur, due to the women not taking their pills “meticulously.”

The reason there were so few subjects is that women kept dropping out of the trials. They did not like the side effects. All Eig can see is that women “desperately” wanted reliable contraception. But he does not see the significance of the fact that the women themselves turned their backs on it.

This pattern continues to this day. Women in developing countries frequently stop using contraception, much to the consternation of the population controllers from developed countries and international agencies who keep coming in to “help” them.

Thinking entirely within the Contraceptive Regime, all he can see is that the world is overpopulated, and something has to be done about it. But today, underpopulation is a bigger problem than overpopulation. Japan, which lionized Margaret Sanger for her work on family planning, was one of the “over-crowded” countries on the eve of the Pill. Japan is now one of the most rapidly aging, shrinking populations in the world, tied with Germany for the second oldest population in the world, with an average age of 46.1.

Moreover, coercive population control is a reality that hormonal contraceptives have made possible. China’s infamous One Child Policy is a crime against humanity, by any reasonable definition of that term.  The United Nations has been aggressively promoting a government contraceptive policy in the Philippines, a Roman Catholic country in which birth control is legally available. But only about 50 percent of the population uses contraception. And the birth rate? Is it some unimaginably high, out of control, breeding-like-bunnies number? The Total Fertility Rate in the Philippines is 3.06 babies per woman over the course of her whole lifetime. Yet, to get this population “under control” the United Nations, with the complicity of the United States government, has interfered in the legislative process of a sovereign democratic country.

These results are perhaps not what Margaret Sanger and Dr John Rock and Dr Gregory Pincus and Katherine McCormack expected. But as we look back on it, I do believe we have an obligation not to whitewash these obvious consequences of the Contraceptive Regime.

I appreciate the fact that Jonathan Eig has told the story of The Pill honestly. Now, I hope he will allow his gaze to shift, ever so slightly, so that he can see the information he has collected in a new light. The Pill didn’t solve all of women’s problems. It created whole new series of problems. And the problems it was supposed to solve could have been solved some other way.

This “Revolution” is nothing to celebrate.
Report Spam   Logged
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #70 on: December 07, 2014, 09:01:33 am »

Abortion industry giving wink, nod to **** men, says pro-lifer

The abortion industry is still protecting pedophiles in spite of undercover investigations making the practice public.

Years ago Life Dynamics did an undercover investigation revealing children being aborted and their molesters not reported, and Live Action did an investigation several years later revealing the continuing practice.

Life Dynamics founder Mark Crutcher cites a case in point in Florida in which a 33-year-old man impregnated a 12-year-old girl. The abortionist was Michael Benjamin.

Crutcher says of the abortionist: "Michael Benjamin gives her, as it turned out in the medical board hearings, between six and eight minutes of counseling and then aborts this child - aborts her child - and releases her back to the ****."

Jones is currently serving a 15-year prison sentence for the crime.

The medical board gave Benjamin a slap on the wrist for not reporting it and ordered him supervised by another doctor, which turned out to be an abortionist he was already working with.

Statistics show 60 to 80 percent of minor girls impregnated were molested by men.

Crutcher says the abortion lobby is "basically thumbing their noses at the states' mandatory reporting laws," which means not reporting these adult men as required by law.

Crutcher claims that Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation are operating a "nationwide **** protection racket" and says Benjamin is a classic example of it.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/pro-life/2014/12/02/abortion-industry-giving-wink-nod-to-****-men-says-pro-lifer#.VIRrYcmOzf0
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #71 on: January 04, 2015, 06:27:50 am »

Prince Andrew may have been secretly filmed with underage girl he is alleged to have abused

Papers filed against his pervert pal Jeffrey Epstein say he recorded VIP orgies he threw at his luxury homes using cameras hidden in the walls

Prince Andrew’s tycoon pal may have taken compromising photos of him with the underage girl he is alleged to have abused.

Details buried in original court papers filed against pervert Jeffrey Epstein, 61, reveal that he recorded the sordid orgies he threw for VIPs at his luxury homes using cameras hidden in the walls of guest bedrooms.

The woman known as Jane Doe 3 – said to be 30-year-old Virginia Roberts – claims she was held as a sex slave and forced to sleep with the Duke of York in London, New York and the US Virgin Islands.

She says she was 17 at the time – under the age of consent in Florida.

One of the sexual encounters with the Prince, 54, is alleged to have taken place at an **** ­involving other underage girls on Epstein’s private island.

The financier, who was jailed for 18 months in 2008 after pleading guilty to solicitation for prostitution, kept a sickening stash of images on a computer seized at his Palm Beach mansion in 2006.

Prince Andrew was a frequent guest at the house.

Lawyers representing Roberts, originally referred to as Jane Doe 102, mentioned the hidden cameras in a 27-page filing at the Palm Beach Federal Courthouse in Florida.

The six-year-old papers, seen by the Sunday People, state: “Some of the photographs in the defendant’s possession were taken with hidden cameras set up in [Epstein’s] home in Palm Beach.

“On the Day of his arrest, police found two hidden cameras and photographs of ­underage girls on a computer in the defendant’s home.

“[He] may have taken lewd ­photographs of Jane Doe 102 with his hidden cameras and transported [them] to his other residences and elsewhere.”

There is no suggestion that Prince Andrew knew Roberts was being held as a sex slave by the tycoon and she claims she first met the royal when the financier took her to Europe and North Africa in 2001.

During a stop in London they called on his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of crooked media mogul Robert Maxwell.

Roberts claims in the latest court documents, filed on December 30, that she first slept with the prince at Maxwell’s home.

Court papers also allege that Maxwell presented **** pictures of her she had taken herself to Epstein as a birthday present.

They add that Roberts’ claims that she was forced to tell Epstein all about her sexual encounters so he could use the information to “blackmail” the royal.

She further claims she was sex-trafficked to “many other powerful men, including numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well known Prime Minister, and other world leaders”.

Prosecutors believe Epstein, who enjoyed watching other people have sex, had cameras fitted at his other residences across the world.

Prince Andrew – who was photographed with Roberts during a party in New York – was holed up in a luxury ski chalet in Switzerland on Saturday.

Buckingham Palace repeated his strongly-worded denial of the allegations.

Prince Andrew holidayed with Epstein in Thailand in 2001 and was snapped surrounded by **** women on a yacht.

A handyman who spent 11 years working for the tycoon claimed Prince Andrew often had massages when he was a guest at his Palm Beach mansion.

Juan Alessi said the Prince enjoyed daily massages from young women and often emerged “smiling” after rub-downs.

He said the massages were carried out in a private part of the mansion only Epstein and selected guests could access.

Alessi also told how he witnessed parties at the ­waterfront mansion at which the Prince was present while young girls frolicked in the ****.

Despite his friend’s 2008 conviction for child sex offences, Prince Andrew continued to see him and the pair were pictured together in Central Park, New York.

The ensuing furore led to him quitting his role as Britain’s trade envoy.

Epstein served 13 months before he was released.

Jane Doe’s claims against the Prince come after she joined three women in a lawsuit against prosecutors, claiming they broke the law by failing to consult them before signing a plea deal for the tycoon.

It is understood that without the agreement he would have faced up to 15 years in jail.

The ongoing lawsuit was filed by Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell and names the US Government as the defendant.

The lawyers say Epstein’s treatment was “contrary to the Government’s normal approach in prosecuting federal sex offences”.

The US State Attorney’s office in Florida still has the vile haul of images from Epstein’s Palm Beach home, which were captured on devices hidden in walls inside guest bedrooms.

A spokesman said: “These matters are subject to ongoing litigation. We have no comment.”

Ghislaine Maxwell branded claims against her as “untrue”.

Her spokesman said: “The allegations... against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue. The original allegations are not new and have been fully responded to and shown to be untrue.

“Each time the story is retold it changes with new salacious details about public figures and world leaders.

“[The woman’s] claims are obvious lies and should be treated as such. Ghislaine Maxwell’s original response to the lies remains the same. [She] strongly denies allegations of an unsavoury nature... and reserves her right to seek redress.”

Buckingham Palace has denied “any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors” by Prince Andrew.

Prince holes up in luxury ski resort

Prince Andrew was holed up in a luxury Swiss ski chalet tonight as the sex abuse claim hit the headlines worldwide.

He did not leave the holiday home in the posh village of ­Verbier, where he is on a family holiday with ex-wife Fergie and their daughters Beatrice and Eugenie.

On every other day of the New Year break he left either to ski on Verbier’s famous slopes or dine at the resort’s restaurants.

Some reports suggested Andrew may be preparing to fly back to the UK today.

Eugenie, 24, and her friend Cressida Bonas, 25, were seen at the chalet on Saturday afternoon.

Eugenie’s sister Beatrice, 26, was in Verbier earlier last week but by yesterday had left for a break in the Caribbean.

Singer Pixie Lott, 23, is also in the resort and celebrated New Year at the exclusive Farinet hotel.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrew-been-secretly-filmed-4915421
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #72 on: January 17, 2015, 09:15:42 pm »

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/01/17/woman-plans-to-marry-her-father-after-two-years-dating/
1/17/15
Woman plans to marry her father after two years of dating

A teenager has revealed in an interview that she plans to marry her father and have children after dating for two years.

The unnamed 18-year-old revealed in an interview with New York Magazine her romantic relationship of almost two years with her biological father after being estranged from him for 12 years.

In the interview, the girl also said the two also plan on having children.

The teenager said her father reached out to her on Facebook when she was in high school and soon after, she went to stay with him for a week.

After the week together, the 18-year-old said they had sex and then started dating.

"Everyone on my mom’s side of the family sees us as father and daughter," she told the magazine. "Those who know that he’s my dad, and that we are engaged, include my father’s parents (they can see we are happy together and they can’t wait for us to have babies — they treat us just like any other couple), the woman we live with, and my best friend."

After the wedding, the woman says they plan to move to New Jersey where adult incest is legal.
Report Spam   Logged
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #73 on: January 28, 2015, 11:51:34 am »

Recruitment? Middle-school students hear from homosexual high schoolers

A Boston-area middle school was caught quietly trying to introduce students to a homosexual club without telling parents.

Lynnfield Middle School (pictured below) tried to sneak the Gay-Straight Alliance assembly past parents until MassResistance, a pro-family organization, learned about the plan. The event was held late last year.

Lynnfield Middle School (Boston)Brian Camenker of MassResistance says this is not unusual and claims schools try to do this all the time.

"They routinely try to avoid telling parents," he says, "and if do, they they're very dishonest about what it really is," hiding behind terms such as "tolerance."

On its website, MassResistance reported that it learned of the assembly from a "frantic mother" who heard about it but was not informed by the school itself.

Once Mass Resistance confronted the school about the secret assembly, Camenker says school officials quickly sent out an email to parents.

Camenker, Brian (MassResistance)"Had we not called, they would not have done it," he claims.

The MassResistance website also has the email sent to parents. It informed parents on December 14 of a "brief informational assembly" planned for December 16 in which seventh and eighth graders would hear homosexual and lesbian high schoolers "share their positive experiences" as members of the GSA.

"They would have gotten a heavy dose of this stuff without parents knowing about it," Camenker argues.

He says Mass Resistance has filed an update to a law in the Massachusetts Legislature requiring parental notification of school events to include homosexual-related events and activities.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/education/2015/01/27/recruitment-middle-school-students-hear-from-homosexual-high-schoolers#.VMkhsi5rWk4
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #74 on: February 03, 2015, 07:23:00 pm »

https://www.yahoo.com/health/the-puzzling-link-between-hiv-diagnoses-and-109987894272.html
2/3/15
The Puzzling Link Between HIV Diagnoses And Craigslist

A new study has linked a rise in HIV diagnoses with the emergence of Craigslist personal ads throughout the US. The research, conducted between 1999 and 2008, found that HIV cases rose in a city when Craigslist was introduced.

“Online platforms offer access to a larger social group than is generally available through offline contacts, making the internet an emerging venue for seeking casual sex partners. The ease of seeking sex partners through classified ad sites may promote risky behaviors that increase transmission of STDs,” study authors Jason Chan and Anindya Ghose write.

The idea behind the HIV study arose when Chan and Ghose were researching Craigslist as a means to sell used goods. They noticed a large number of ads for one-night-stands, both in major cities — not so surprising, they thought —and smaller cities, where casual hookups aren’t quite as common. Chan and Ghose eventually focused their research on 33 states, and found that when Craigslist came to town, HIV rates rose.

"Craigslist’s entry into a market is related to a 16 percent increase in HIV cases," Chan tells Yahoo Health. "This maps out to an average of 6,200 cases of HIV infection in the US each year, which amounts to $62 million in annual treatment costs. We further found that the increase in HIV trends is linked with the personal ad section, not the escort section."

Now, as casual hookup apps like Grindr and Tinder begin to replace online ads, experts worry that HIV rates might continue to rise. “With apps like Tinder and Grindr being used more and more, the likely consequence is that we will see a even greater spread of the disease,” Chan tells Yahoo Health. “However, this is only a speculation because human behavior is dynamic and can be subjected to changes over time. With the release of this study result and the increase in awareness raised about the risks involved in hooking up online strangers, individuals who use these apps might take more precautions or eliminate their current risky behaviors.”
Report Spam   Logged
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #75 on: February 11, 2015, 02:37:01 pm »

Pa. Middle School Students Given ‘Fifty Shades Of Grey’ Puzzles

Parents in a Pennsylvania school district are turning 50 shades of red over word search puzzles given to their middle school students.

The students were given puzzles based on the erotic novel and movie “Fifty Shades of Grey.” The puzzles contained terms including “spanking,” ”submissive,” ”leather cuffs” and “bondage.”

Officials in the Monessen School District say they can’t say who passed out the puzzles or how many students received one because they just learned about it Monday.

The issue became public when parents complained at Tuesday night’s school board meeting.

Superintendent Leanne Spazak said the incident was under investigation.

Parent James Carter says he tried to question the school’s principal and dean of students about the puzzle his son received, but they refused when he insisted on recording their conversation.

http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2015/02/11/pa-middle-school-students-given-fifty-shades-of-grey-puzzles/
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #76 on: February 11, 2015, 03:37:40 pm »

I don't know too much about this movie - but what I HAVE heard and read is that it's one very, VERY sick movie.

15-20 years ago, there would have been a bigger backlash against it than the Titanic disaster.(and would have been slapped with an NC-17 rating, and ultimately banned in some states) Now? It's as if it's part of our pop-culture. Very sad, but the bible prophecizes all of this would happen.

Come quickly Lord Jesus!

Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #77 on: February 13, 2015, 05:25:35 pm »

Frustrated movie critics want MORE sex fornication in Fifty Shades of Grey as flaccid flick fails to get them hot under the collar
2/12/15

Critics said tame feature film, out on February 13, was 'run of the mill'
One pointed out that lead Jamie Dornan mostly keeps his pants on
BDSM props deployed on Dakota Johnson were also termed 'vanilla'
It was often remarked that EL James novels were far more explicit



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2948669/Frustrated-movie-critics-clamor-sex-flaccid-Fifty-Shades-Grey-fails-hot-collar.html#ixzz3Rg7CFwr4

From what I've read - if it came out 15-20 years ago, it would have gotten an NC-17 rating(instead the R rating it has now) - these "film critics" are part of the MSM puppet establishment. Be ye not deceived!
Report Spam   Logged
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #78 on: March 16, 2015, 11:23:28 am »

**** belongs in the classroom, says Danish professor

Sexologist says discussion with teenagers about the industry would make them more critical consumers




A leading sexologist in Denmark has called for ****ography to be shown in the classroom, claiming that starting a debate about the industry could help teenagers become “conscientious and critical consumers” who are able to tell the difference between ****ography and the reality of sexual relationships.

Prof Christian Graugaard of Aalborg University caused a furore in Denmark when he suggested on public television that ****ography should be shown in schools. This was preferable, he told the Danish public broadcaster DR, to sex education classes that were “boring and technical, where you roll a condom onto a cucumber”.

Graugaard’s proposal is not simply following in the long tradition of sexually permissive Scandinavia. It is, he insists, a sensible way of teaching teenagers that ****ography is nothing like real sex.

“My proposal is to critically discuss ****ography with 8th and 9th graders [age 15 – the legal age of consent in Denmark – and 16 respectively] as part of a sensible didactic strategy, carried out by trained teachers,” he told the Guardian.

“We know from research that a vast majority of teenagers have seen **** at an early age – so it’s not a question of introducing youngsters to ****,” he added. According to one Nordic study, 99% of boys and 86% of girls in Scandinavia have already seen ****ographic films by the time they’re 16. What Graugaard wants is to make sure teens “possess the necessary skills to view **** constructively”.

“We should strengthen their ability to distinguish between the media’s depictions of the body and sex and the everyday life of an average teenager. They should become conscientious and critical consumers.”

Sex education has been mandatory in Denmark since 1970 and ****ography is already included in the curriculum in several Danish schools – but not all. “Schools interpret the national guidelines very differently,” says Graugaard. “So it’s important that education meets certain quality standards all over the country, that teachers are well trained and that up-to-date methods are constantly developed. Right now, Denmark is a developing country with regard to the methodology of sex education, and this should be changed.”
Advertisement

Denmark was the first country in the world to lift the ban on ****ography in 1967. “**** may actually offer a variety of both entertaining and educational properties,” Graugaard said. “**** can even be feminist and in some cases it can be part of a democratisation of sex and [it can] promote diversity. But it can also be excluding – of body types, gender and sexuality. We want our kids to have exciting and gratifying sex lives, so an open-minded, constructive dialogue is the best way to make sure that they are able to make meaningful decisions for themselves.”

He added: “It’s not our job to scare off teenagers, rather we should encourage them to explore the joys of sexuality in a safe way and on their own terms – instead of turning our backs on them.”

A similar scheme was suggested in the UK in 2014 when sexual health charity Brook, the PSHE Association and the Sex Education Forum issued new guidelines for sex education in schools including discussion about the dangers of “sexting” and X-rated films.


http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2015/mar/16/****ography-belongs-classroom-professor-denmark

http://tinyurl.com/lwbde9z
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #79 on: March 25, 2015, 07:45:01 pm »

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/read-fifty-shades-grey-boyfriend-172340327.html
I read 'Fifty Shades of Grey' with my boyfriend and it changed our relationship
3/25/15

(Jessica Orwig)Me and Dave last Christmas.Let me start by explaining how this happened: My boyfriend, let's call him "Dave," and I are in a long-distance relationship. Therefore, we have to come up with activities that we can do together without actually being together.
Last month, he suggested we read a book. After discussing possible genres, then arguing over what constitutes a "good" mystery novel, I only half-jokingly suggested "50 Shades of Grey." After all, it was just in time for Valentine's Day and I had been seeing the seductive trailers for the film "50 Shades of Grey," based on the 2011 novel. I was admittedly more than a little curious.

To my surprise, Dave agreed, after a few seconds of hesitation. And here we are, more than 500 pages of mediocre plot and cringe-inducing **** later, and I must say that our relationship is better for it. Here's why:

Experts will tell you how important communication is for a healthy relationship, and while E.L. James's novel isn't the best piece of literature around, it's a classic example of a relationship gone sour because of poor communication.

As we read the book, Dave and I could objectively discuss where the main characters went wrong, who was to blame, and ultimately what they could have done to avoid the miserable situations they find themselves in by the end.

Over the course of our five-year relationship, Dave and I have had our fair share of arguments. Many of them spawned from miscommunication by one or both of us. And if you and your partner have ever fought because of some kind of miscommunication, then you know how difficult it is to see any side but your own.

Reading "50 Shades of Grey" gave Dave and me the unique chance to see each other's perspective on how couples should communicate.

More importantly, we were detached from the characters, thanks to their bizarre qualities and poor character development. This detachment meant that if we disagreed how one character acted or miscommunicated we could calmly discuss our opinions without getting into a heated dispute where someone's pride was left beaten on the floor.

During one memorable conversation we even managed to resolve a major misunderstanding we had early in our relationship.

For example, about two-thirds into the story, the two main characters, Anastasia Steele and Christian Grey, have an in-depth discussion on Steele's feelings about their relationship, which at that point has escalated from just sex to semi-serious. The discussion, however, is conducted through a series of back-and-forth emails.

Dave strongly felt a conversation like that should take place in person and did not understand why the author had it happen any other way. While I agree a topic that important should be discussed in person, the emails were a perfect example of Steele's inability to express herself when she's with Grey.

As it turns out, I sent a few angry emails to Dave during our first year together because I, too, used to struggle with communicating my emotions. (I eventually stopped when I learned those emails ruined his entire day.)

As we discussed the example in the book, I mentioned my angry emails as a way to defend both the author's choice and Steele's actions. To my surprise, Dave had thought that I was sending those emails to be a killjoy. To his surprise, I'd sent those emails to communicate.

Needless to say, I was reminded of the importance of clear communication in a relationship and it's all thanks to a very unexpected source. Thanks, E.L. James.
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #80 on: March 25, 2015, 07:47:23 pm »

^^

1Corinthians 7:1  Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.
1Co 7:2  Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
1Co 7:3  Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.
1Co 7:4  The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.
1Co 7:5  Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
1Co 7:6  But I speak this by permission, and not of commandment.
Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #81 on: March 29, 2015, 04:44:01 pm »

He discusses the evil spirits that influenced Ted Bundy(among other things) - this is a must listen!



Report Spam   Logged
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #82 on: March 30, 2015, 02:14:59 pm »

Report Spam   Logged
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #83 on: April 09, 2015, 05:37:46 am »

Obama calls for end to 'gay conversion therapies'

US President Barack Obama has condemned psychiatric therapies designed to "repair" gay, lesbian and transgender youth. Mr Obama's statement was in response to an online petition calling for a ban on conversion therapies. It gained over 120,000 signatures in three months. The petition was inspired by Leelah Alcorn, a 17-year-old transgender youth who committed suicide in December.   

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-32227353
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #84 on: April 20, 2015, 07:35:35 pm »

'Gay Marriage' Rooted in Sexologist's Fraudulent Research

The very notion of "gay marriage" is an artificial construct. It's the aberrant byproduct of the sexual revolution, which itself was largely instigated by bug doctor turned "sexologist," Alfred Kinsey.

Though married to a woman who took part in his many filmed "scientific" orgies, Kinsey was a promiscuous homosexual and sadomasochist. He managed to completely upend and twist the world's perception of human sexuality in the 1950s and '60s with his world-famous "Kinsey Reports."

While his "research" has been universally discredited and exposed as fraudulent, ideologically motivated and even criminal, it remains, nonetheless, the primary source behind today's "sexual orientation science."

For this reason, and many others, the novel notion of "gay marriage" sits atop a house of cards.

On April 28, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on whether to attempt, once and for all, the deconstruction and redefinition of the institution of marriage. The court will then hand down a decision by the end of June. In anticipation of this landmark case, civil rights law firm Liberty Counsel has submitted to the Supreme Court a friend of the court brief that reveals the criminally fraudulent foundation upon which the "marriage equality" Tower of Babel has been raised.

Among other things, the brief features the findings of Dr. Judith Reisman, the foremost expert on Kinsey's pseudo-scientific cultural activism. Reisman has served as scientific consultant to four U.S. Department of Justice administrations, the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). She is a visiting professor of law at Liberty University School of Law and works hand-in-hand with Liberty Counsel.

As the brief reveals, most people are completely unaware that during his tenure at Indiana University, Kinsey facilitated, with stopwatches and ledgers, the systematic sexual abuse of hundreds, if not thousands, of children and infants—all in the name of science. Kinsey's research also determined that **** doesn't really hurt women.

Kinsey claimed that, like himself, over 30 percent of men are homosexual (today's legitimate research has established this figure to actually fall somewhere between 1-3 percent). There can be no doubt that, if he were alive today, Alfred Kinsey would be one of the loudest voices clamoring for the redefinition of marriage.

"For the past 67 years, scholars, lawyers and judges have undertaken fundamental societal transformation by embracing Alfred Kinsey's statistically and scientifically fraudulent 'data' derived from serial child rapists, sex offenders, prisoners, prostitutes, pedophiles and pederasts," notes the brief. "Now these same change agents, still covering up the fraudulent nature of the Kinsey 'data,' want this Court to utilize it to demolish the cornerstone of society, natural marriage."

"Changing millennia of history must always be approached with trepidation," the brief continues. "In this case, the change must be rejected outright not only because it is seeking to redefine something which cannot be redefined, but also because the proposed change is grounded in fraudulent 'research' based on skewed demographics and the sexual abuse of hundreds of infants and children."

The brief pleads with the Supreme Court not to "erase millennia of human history and dismantle the granite cornerstone of society in favor of an experimental construct that is barely a decade old." Instead, Liberty Counsel asserts, "This case presents the Court with the opportunity to affirm and preserve the unique, comprehensive union of a man and a woman, the foundational social institution upon which society was built and the future of the nation depends."

In the past, the Supreme Court has upheld marriage as a foundational social institution that is necessarily defined as the union of one man and one woman:

    Marriage is "fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race." Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942).
    "An institution in the maintenance of which in its purity the public is deeply interested, for it is the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be neither civilization nor progress." Maynard v. Hill, 125 U. S. 190 (1888).

"Older than the Constitution and the laws of any nation, marriage is not a creation of any government, but it is an obvious relationship between one man and one woman. Marriage is a natural bond that society or religion can only 'solemnize,'" said Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel.

It is a tragic commentary on America's moral freefall that the highest court in the land would consider, even for an instant, perverting the cornerstone institution of marriage to reflect the psychotic image and anti-social activism of a man who, himself, was a criminal pervert.

Liberty Counsel is calling Christians to unite in fasting and prayer for three days before the Supreme Court hears the case—on April 23, 24 and 25.

At this point, prayer alone may save marriage and keep, at bay, the wrath of a just and Holy God.

http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/clarion-call/49271-gay-marriage-rooted-in-sexologist-s-fraudulent-research
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #85 on: April 21, 2015, 09:04:13 am »

 NOTR - Obama & The Kinsey Agenda - 4.13.15
Monday, April 13, 2015 at 6:34PM

Today's Show: OBAMA & THE KINSEY AGENDA

Chris discusses the recent declaration from the White House that encourages a nation wide ban on "gay conversion therapy" -- where parents compel their underage children to seek counsel to help them overcome homosexual feelings.  While several states have already made it illegal for parents to seek help for their children, the Obama Administration is now encouraging that the rest of the country follow along.  But how is this developing idea related to the influence of Alfred Kinsey, the man credited with the progressive sexual revolution that has overwhelmed our country?

http://www.noiseofthunder.com/storage/NOTR_OBAMA.KINSEY_04.14.15.mp3
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #86 on: April 21, 2015, 10:56:54 am »

Lesbian teacher: How I convince kids to accept gay ‘marriage’, starting at 4-years-old

A primary grade lesbian teacher from an Ontario public school revealed in a workshop at a homosexual activist conference for teachers earlier this month how she uses her classroom to convince children as young as four to accept homosexual relationships.

“And I started in Kindergarten. What a great place to start. It was where I was teaching. So, I was the most comfortable there,” Pam Strong said at the conference, attended by LifeSiteNews.

The conference, hosted by the homosexual activist organization Jer’s Vision, now called the Canadian Centre for Gender and Sexual Diversity, focused on the implementation of Bill 13 in Ontario classrooms. Bill 13, called by critics the ‘homosexual bill of rights,’ passed in June 2012 and gave students the right to form pro-gay clubs in their school, including Catholic ones, using the name Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA).

Strong, who is in an open relationship with another woman and who has been a teacher for about five years, focused her workshop on what she called the “power of conversation” for promoting LGBTQ issues in an elementary classroom. She began her talk by relating how she reacted the first time one of her students called another student ‘gay’ as a putdown.

“With [the principal’s] encouragement, we decided that I would go from class to class and talk about what ‘gay’ means, what does ‘LGBTQ’ mean, what do ‘I’ mean,” she told about 40 attendees, all educators, at her workshop.

Strong related how she began with the junior kindergarten class.

“And I read a [pro-gay child’s] book [King and King], and I started to realize that conversations can be very difficult, and they can have the most power when they are the most difficult.”

“But difficult conversations are a part of what we do as teachers, right? And when these conversations are properly supported by teachers within the safety of the classroom, they provide a rich environment for our students as they unpack these complex social issues and they reflect on their own preconceptions, rights, of gender, sexuality, love, all these different things,” she said.

Strong related that as she was reading “King and King” in the junior kindergarten class as a springboard to discuss her sexuality with the kids, she got to the part where the two princes become ‘married’ when one of the boys suddenly shouted out: “They can’t do that! They can’t get married. They’re two boys.”

Recounted Strong: “And I said, ‘Oh, yeah, yeah, they can. It’s right here on page 12.”
Image
Some of the pro-gay children's books Strong uses with her students. Pete Baklinski / LifeSiteNews

To which the boy replied, according to Strong: “Oh, yeah, I know Mrs. Strong, but that’s just a story. That’s not real life.”

“And I said: ‘It happens in real life too. I am married to a woman. I am gay. And I am in love with my wife.”

Strong said the young children “just all kind of went silent.” She then told them: “That may seem different to you, how many of you have heard of that before?”

“Not one hand went up,” she related. “And so I said: ‘That may seem different to you, but we’re not that different. Would you like to know about what I do with my family?”

“Yeah, tell us,” she recounted the children enthusiastically saying.

“I said, you know, we take our kids to the park. I swing them on swings,” she related, telling conference attendees that she could share things she did with her own children that “mostly likely all of their families did with them.”

Then she told the children: “We laugh together. We go grocery shopping together. I read to them. I tickle them, sometimes until they scream and laugh and when they cry, I hug them until they stop.”

Strong said that at that point, the boy who had used the word ‘gay’ looked and her and said: “Well, you’re a family.”

“And I said, yeah, we are,” she related. “And off I go to the next classroom.”

Strong said that she went from “class to class to class and continued with these conversations, and they were very powerful.”

‘It’s normal in my classroom’

Strong related an incident that happened last fall involving a new boy who had recently entered her grade 5 classroom. The new boy had not yet been made aware of Strong’s sexual preference for other women.

“All my class is very used to who I am. My family picture is very proudly in my room now. On Mondays they quite often will say, ‘What did you do with your wife?’ It’s normal in my classroom.”

Strong said that a conversation between herself and the students came up one day where it was mentioned that she was a lesbian. The new boy put his hands over his mouth and said, according to Strong: “Oh, my God, I think I’m going to puke.”

“As I took the abuse — personally, as an individual – of those words, I also saw half of my class look at me with incredible concern. One student who was right in front of me already had tears in her eyes. And I noticed several other students who were looking at him. They were just very, very upset with this kid,” she related.

Strong said the boy instantly became aware that “something he had said had just created this unbelievable tension in the room.” She related how she addressed the boy, telling him: “I think that what you might not be aware of is that I am gay, and I am married to a woman, and my family has two moms.’”
Image
The chart Strong uses to show her students that same-sex partnerships are the same as male-female families. Pete Baklinski / LifeSiteNews

“His eyes just started darting around, and he was incredibly uncomfortable,” she related.

“I looked at the other kids and I said: ‘Ok guys, what I want to ask you is: Am I upset with him?’ And the one little girl in my class put up her hand — that doesn’t usually get into these conversations very much in my classroom — and she said, ‘Mrs Strong, I know you’re not upset with him, because he hasn’t had the benefit of our conversations.”

“And I looked at my little friend, my ‘new’ friend, and I said: ‘But, we’re going to have one now,’” she related.

Strong said that she then directed her class to the board and asked them to write everything she had told them related to LGBTQ.

“And my class all of a sudden popped up. ‘LGBTQ’ was on the board, ‘lesbian,’ and all the different words coming out there. And I sat back and said, ‘Let’s review.’ So, the last year and a half of ‘inclusive’ education came alive in my classroom.”

Strong told her workshop attendees that her “new little friend” is now a devoted champion of diversity. She boasted how he was the one in her class to count down the days to the pro-homosexual Day of Pink that took place earlier this month. When Strong took a photo of all the children wearing pink shirts in her classroom, she said the boy requested to be in the front.

“For me, that is the power of conversations. That’s the power of sharing our stories,” she said.

LGBTQ classroom ‘conversation starters’

Strong called it “key” to develop a “positive classroom culture” — and she mentioned it often takes months — before getting into what she called “difficult conversations” with students about convincing students of the normality of her sexual preference for women.

She mentioned how she spends time “building a common vocabulary” in her classroom of words like “stereotype, prejudice, discrimination” so her students will be able to more readily conform to her pro-LGBTQ message.

“Sometimes with these big ideas there are also very big words that are very hard to understand. I find that whether it’s kindergarten, right up to grade six, visuals help a lot,” she said.

Click "like" if you want to defend true marriage.

The lesbian teacher has amassed a collection of “conversation starters” that she says helps get her started when presenting to her students the LGBTQ message. She said pro-gay children’s books are one of her favorites.

“I use current events, news articles, advertisement are great for gender, especially with Kindergarten kids, pink and girl toys and all the rest of it. Commercials are great, I use one right now, the Honey Maid commercial.” The 2014 “Dad & Papa" commercial depicts two male same-sex partners engaging with their children in normal family activities such as making s’mores, eating dinner around the table, and walking in the park.

Strong says she watches the commercial with her students up to three times, asking them to make a list of all the similarities between the gay-partnership and their own families.

“Of course they think it’s going to be so different, [that] this family is going to be so different,” she said.

Strong said the kids notice dozens of similarities, but usually only one difference, namely that the commercial has “two dads.” Other than this, she said the students “could not find one thing in that commercial that was different than their own families.” In this way she convinces the kids that a gay-partnership is identical to a family made up of a male and female. Strong called it a “fantastic lesson for kids of all ages.”

“There was nothing left for me to teach at the end of it. It was a huge learning for some kids,” she said.

‘Recruiting children? You bet we are’

Though homosexual activists claim their efforts in the schools are a way of combatting bullying, a number of homosexual activists have highlighted that the movement’s goal is in fact to “indoctrinate” children into accepting the normalcy of the homosexual lifestyle.

“I am here to tell you: All that time I said I wasn't indoctrinating anyone with my beliefs about gay and lesbian and bi and trans and queer people? That was a lie,” wrote Canadian gay activist Sason Bear Bergman, a woman who identifies as a transgender man, in a March 2015 piece titled “I Have Come to Indoctrinate Your Children Into My LGBTQ Agenda (And I'm Not a Bit Sorry).” Bergman holds nothing back, stating she wants to make children “like us” even if that “goes against the way you have interpreted the teachings of your religion.”

In 2011 U.S. gay activist Daniel Villarreal penned a column for Queerty.com stating that the time had come for the homosexual lobby to admit to “indoctrinating” schoolchildren to accept homosexuality.

“Why would we push anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal?”

“We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality. In fact, our very future depends on it. Recruiting children? You bet we are,” he added.

Homosexual activist Michael Swift wrote in 1987 in the Gay Community News that school children would become explicit targets for homosexual indoctrination. “We shall seduce them in your schools…They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us,” he wrote at the time.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lesbian-teacher-how-i-convince-kids-to-accept-gay-marriage-starting-at-4-ye
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #87 on: April 21, 2015, 11:26:54 am »

Quote
Homosexual activist Michael Swift wrote in 1987 in the Gay Community News that school children would become explicit targets for homosexual indoctrination. “We shall seduce them in your schools…They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us,” he wrote at the time.

That is disgusting... Angry

Vladimir Lenin: “Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.”

Adolph Hitler: “Give me a child when he’s 7 and he’s mine forever.”



just saying
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Mark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21783



View Profile
« Reply #88 on: April 22, 2015, 08:44:43 am »

District Apologizes After Transgender Book Read to Children Without Parental Notice

Officials with a school district in Maine are apologizing after a book about transgendered child was read to elementary school students without advance notice to parents.

An estimated 20 out of 22 classes in kindergarten through third grade  at Horace Mitchell Primary School in Kittery Point were recently read the book “I Am Jazz,” written by and about Jazz Jennings, a 14-year-old transgender activist. The book was part of a lesson to children about tolerance and acceptance.

“I have a girl brain but a boy body,” it reads. “This is called transgender. I was born this way!”

But according to reports, the book left some students with a lot of questions and they came home asking their parents if they might be transgender. Some parents consequently contacted the school out of concern that they were never notified that the material would be read to their children.

“My right as a parent to allow or not allow this discussion with my child was taken from me,” one unidentified parent of a first-grader told conservative reporter Sean Hannity. “It is very upsetting to me that I didn’t have an option at all.”

She said that her son asked her if he might really be “a girl in love with a girl.”

“I was taken aback by [what was read to them],” the parent stated. “Being seven, once you put something in their mind they don’t forget so easily.”

The day after her words were published, Superintendent Allyn Hutton sent out a letter to parents about the lesson with an apology that prior notice had not been given about the reading.

“The Kittery School District embraces diversity and is committed to creating an atmosphere of respect and tolerance for all people, regardless of their race, religion, political belief system or sexual orientation,” she wrote. “… With this in mind, guidance staff of the Horace Mitchell School recently read aloud the book, ‘I Am Jazz,’ a book about a transgender student.”

“We have a practice of if a topic is considered sensitive, parents should be informed. In this situation, that didn’t happen,” she continued. “The whole culture at Mitchell School is about teaching tolerance and respect. The people presenting the lesson thought [‘I Am Jazz’] was one more piece of teaching that lesson. In retrospect, we understand that toleration is tolerating people of all opinions.”

However, the school’s guidance blog asserts that it is not inappropriate to teach elementary school students about gender identity issues.

“Some may think primary school students are too young to worry about addressing issues surrounding gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and questioning (LGBTQ) students. Not so, experts say,” it reads. “It’s never too early to begin teaching children about respecting differences. When our students and their parents have questions related to LGBTQ issues, our goal is to foster healthy dialog, critical thinking and inclusiveness.”

http://christiannews.net/2015/04/22/district-apologizes-after-transgender-book-read-to-children-without-parental-notice/
Report Spam   Logged

What can you do for Jesus?  Learn what 1 person can accomplish.

The Man from George Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjMvPhLrn8
Psalm 51:17
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28357


View Profile
« Reply #89 on: April 28, 2015, 09:36:53 am »

This is NOT an endorsement of Paul Washer - but he does make good points.

Report Spam   Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
Free SMF Hosting - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy