End Times and Current Events
February 05, 2023, 05:20:05 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome To End Times and Current Events.
  Home Help Search Gallery Staff List Login Register  
December 31, 2022, 10:08:58 am NilsFor1611 says: blessings
August 08, 2018, 02:38:10 am suzytr says: Hello, any good churches in the Sacto, CA area, also looking in Reno NV, thanks in advance and God Bless you Smiley
January 29, 2018, 01:21:57 am Christian40 says: It will be interesting to see what happens this year Israel being 70 years as a modern nation may 14 2018
October 17, 2017, 01:25:20 am Christian40 says: It is good to type Mark is here again!  Smiley
October 16, 2017, 03:28:18 am Christian40 says: anyone else thinking that time is accelerating now? it seems im doing days in shorter time now is time being affected in some way?
September 24, 2017, 10:45:16 pm Psalm 51:17 says: The specific rule pertaining to the national anthem is found on pages A62-63 of the league rulebook. It states: “The National Anthem must be played prior to every NFL game, and all players must be on the sideline for the National Anthem. “During the National Anthem, players on the field and bench area should stand at attention, face the flag, hold helmets in their left hand, and refrain from talking. The home team should ensure that the American flag is in good condition. It should be pointed out to players and coaches that we continue to be judged by the public in this area of respect for the flag and our country. Failure to be on the field by the start of the National Anthem may result in discipline, such as fines, suspensions, and/or the forfeiture of draft choice(s) for violations of the above, including first offenses.”
September 20, 2017, 04:32:32 am Christian40 says: "The most popular Hepatitis B vaccine is nothing short of a witch’s brew including aluminum, formaldehyde, yeast, amino acids, and soy. Aluminum is a known neurotoxin that destroys cellular metabolism and function. Hundreds of studies link to the ravaging effects of aluminum. The other proteins and formaldehyde serve to activate the immune system and open up the blood-brain barrier. This is NOT a good thing."
September 19, 2017, 03:59:21 am Christian40 says: bbc international did a video about there street preaching they are good witnesses
September 14, 2017, 08:06:04 am Psalm 51:17 says: bro Mark Hunter on YT has some good, edifying stuff too.
September 14, 2017, 04:31:26 am Christian40 says: i have thought that i'm reaping from past sins then my life has been impacted in ways from having non believers in my ancestry.
View Shout History
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 12
1  General Category / Member's videos / Re: Documentary: Black Hebrew Israelites Debunked on: September 03, 2017, 02:15:55 pm
Just wanted to say that I did see this documentary a while back and it was excellent. A very thorough debunking of this ridiculous claim. I highly recommend it if you haven't seen it already.
2  General Category / Member's videos / Re: Conspirianity on: September 03, 2017, 02:13:06 pm
1) A lot of Rivera's claims are unsubstantiated. For example, he claims that Rome invented Islam. Reading the history and development of Islam brings this claim into question. If I recall, he also claimed the Jesuits were behind the Inquisitions, which is impossible seeing as how the Jesuits did not exist in the Middle Ages when the Inquisitions started.

Whether Rivera was at one point a Catholic priest isn't so much the question. It's whether or not he's actually telling the truth. I find it very hard to believe someone when their evidence is either oral tradition or conveniently "lost to history." I call it the "Doc Marquis syndrome", because he tends to use "I learned it from the Illuminati" as some kind of proof of his claims. Again, the gospel and God's word must be taken by faith (and even those aren't without circumstantial evidence), but a person's claims about history or fact do not have to be taken by faith.

2) When did I say that was fake? The Inquisitions happened. That is a historical fact. Just because I don't believe Rome is the origin of all evil in the world doesn't mean I don't think they're responsible for some pretty atrocious things. They are. They're just not responsible for all of the atrocious things in history.

3) The only reason you have a King James Bible is the Protestant Reformation. The only reason you can meet openly without fear of persecution here in the West is the Protestant Reformation. This contrived attack on the Protestant Reformation by King James Bible belivers is very strange. Without the Protestant Reformation, the King James Bible wouldn't even exist, and that's a fact. Here's some more facts: King James of England was a Protestant. Oliver Cromwell was a Protestant. Jonathan Edwards was a Protestant. A lot of great Christian preachers and theologians were Protestant. They baptized infants, yes, but a lot of born again believers have done things wrong in the past. Also, and this is a MAJOR point that you didn't bring up: you glossed over some important quotes in the pages you linked to about the practice of infant baptism:

"Presbyterian, Congregational and many Reformed Christians see infant baptism as the New Testament form of circumcision in the Jewish covenant (Joshua 24:15). Circumcision did not create faith in the 8-day-old Jewish boy. It merely marked him as a member of God's covenant people Israel. Likewise, baptism doesn’t create faith; it is a sign of membership in the visible covenant community."

And what about the Methodists? What do they believe about infant baptism?

"Methodists contend that infant baptism has spiritual value for the infant. John Wesley, the founder of Methodism, held that baptism is a means of grace, but it was symbolic. Methodists view baptism in water as symbolic and believe that it does not regenerate the baptised nor cleanse them from sin."

Contrast that with the teaching of Rome, which states:

Born with a fallen human nature and tainted by original sin, children also have need of the new birth in Baptism to be freed from the power of darkness and brought into the realm of the freedom of the children of God, to which all men are called . . . The Church and the parents would deny a child the priceless grace of becoming a child of God were they not to confer Baptism shortly after birth"

All of that came courtesy of the links you posted.

Roman Catholics believe in "baptismal regeneration" or "baptism as a means of saving grace". Reformed Christians and Methodists, however, do not. It is merely symbolic. Now do I agree with infant baptism? No, I don't. I believe wholeheartedly in believer baptism because it's the only type we can get directly from scripture. But does that make them lost? They don't believe it regenerates you. It's no different than believing in post-tribulationism. It doesn't make you lost, it makes you wrong. It doesn't change the core message of salvation by grace through faith alone.

4) Those passages don't prove the Vatican is Babylon the Great. I can make a pretty airtight case solely from the Bible that the city of Jerusalem in the ToJT will be Babylon the Great. However, I think the point of divergence for us is that we have two different views on what that means. Whereas many Christians see Babylon the Great as the origin of all evil in the world, I see Babylon the Great as an adulteress joining herself with the Beast (Antichrist) and causing the world to do the same.

5) Honestly, as someone who believes the King James Bible is accurately translated from the correct original language manuscripts, a lot of the contention comes from our side, and believe me, I used to be VERY contentious about it. A lot of KJV believers won't even fellowship with believers who use new verisons, even if they line up doctrinally. They can be stalwart independent Baptists who hold identical doctrinal views, but if they read the NKJV, they're heretics who must be shunned.

How many good preachers get raked over the coals because they aren't "pure" enough on the Bible version issue? I know of some pastors/preachers who use both the KJV and the NKJV that are strong in the faith and are used of the Lord, but they are shunned for not being "pure" enough by men's standards. I know of pastors/preachers who are KJV-only but do not hold to the silly notion of advanced revelation that are shunned for not being "pure" enough by men's standards.

The truth is that most people who read new versions aren't like James White. He's a fanatic who I believe has an irrational hatred for the KJV. A lot of believers that I've encountered who read a new version have no desire to keep you from reading the KJV. Again, not saying they shouldn't read the KJV, I'm just saying that the vast majority of new version readers I've met are not anti-KJV. And a lot of the time they line up doctrinally with believers like us. Should they read the KJV? Yes, I believe they should. Are they lost because they don't? No, I don't think so. The gospel pertains to the person and work of Jesus Christ.

Who are the real church splitters, if we're being honest about it? It's the Ruckmanite crowd moreso than the new version readers. And it's those who push Conspirianity moreso than those who don't. That's generally what I've observed. Having been on both sides of the conspiracy theory argument, I know this to be true. I was very contentious and split over minor things, and now I've seen it from the other side, someone getting contentious and splitting with me over minor things.

6) What exactly do you find egregious about my videos? What is the doctrinal heresy being promoted here that I'll have to answer for?

It's funny, conspiratorial Christians can get away with practically anything: teach false doctrines, spread false history, self-aggrandize their "ministry" and falsely accuse one another all in the name of "exposing darkness" and nobody says anything about it. Yet someone who makes a video going against that grain, trying to get history right and providing tangible proof of what they're saying without accusing anyone of being a "Jesuit coadjutor" or an "agent of the Vatican" gets raked over the coals and admonished to "be careful what you post..."

Let me say again: I am NOT a pastor or an online ministry. I'm a guy who posts videos on YouTube in his spare time. Sometimes they pertain strictly to scripture, other times they don't. The scripture videos I take very seriously. I planned to do a video series about the doctrines of grace at some point. And I take that seriously. I tend to have a little more fun with my Conspirianity videos. I use more humor, more sarcasm, etc. but I try not to go overboard.

My whole goal with those videos is to lift the veil and get to the heart of the matter. These conspiracies are purported to be factual, but are they? Or do they fit more under confirmation bias? I explore these themes, and yes, sometimes I do name names. Only people who put themselves out there, though. You'll never see me bring up private people I know personally and give their personal info out on my YouTube channel to shame them. I'm not trying to throw everyone under the bus and I'm NOT calling their salvation into question, but yes I do sometimes highlight different YouTube channels as examples of what I'm talking about. At the same time, I think I'm far gentler than many other brothers and sisters out there, who blindly accuse when they don't have all of the facts.

You already falsely implied me to be a loner on the fringes who neglects his family and wastes his time putzing around on the internet looking for people to "expose" as heretics. I can name a few people who fit that bill much better than me, but for the sake of not beating a dead horse, I won't.

Needless to say I don't do that. This video actually took me months to do because I didn't spend a whole lot of time working on it. I have a wife and kids. I have a family. I have a job. I have a local fellowship I'm a part of. I have commitments and obligations and honestly, when people come at me like this, it burns me out.

7) Regarding the last link you posted, here's an interesting snippet:

Steinacher believes the Vatican's help was based on a hoped-for revival of European Christianity and dread of the Soviet Union. But through the Vatican Refugee Commission, war criminals were knowingly provided with false identities.

So the main reason this happened was because they feared the Soviet Union. This is actually a logical explanation, as the Soviet Union was even more anti-Catholic than the Nazis were. They didn't feign support, and Rome actually did receive support from other fascist regimes (such as the Francoist government in Spain).

However, as I documented in my video, the Nazis were a totally different animal. Hitler's ultimate goal was not spreading Catholicism, it was spreading Nazism. He needed to wipe away all Christian and Catholic influence in order to pave the way for his Nazi utopia. They were not like Franco's Spain or even Mussolini's Italy; both of which had better relations with Rome and with each other than with Germany. Have you ever heard the expression, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend?" I think that's what was going on. The Vatican would rather deal with a neutered Nazi than with a communist.

I'll close with this, since this is kind of what started the back-and-forth: I love David Daniels in the Lord. I love This Was Your Life and appreciate the work that Chick Publications does in spreading the gospel. I have no ill will toward them at all. But it would be a lie to say they don't push a false view of history in order to prop up their conspiracy-laced worldview, particularly in their tract Mama's Girls. This isn't an indictment on their salvation, their evangelistic outreach or on them as people. This is an indictment on their conspiracy theories.

If I came off harsh or rude here, I apologize, that isn't my intention. I just get frustrated sometimes and I start venting and thinking out loud. Maybe I'll just walk away from YouTube. Maybe I should. People there are becoming so hostile now anyway. They're splitting up into little cliques and insulating themselves from correction and any opposing viewpoints. It's aggravating.
3  General Category / Member's videos / Re: Conspirianity on: August 30, 2017, 09:33:59 pm
Might as well make 1-2 more comments here.

David Daniels of Chick Publications doesn't push "Conspirianity" - he and Chick have some of the best works on exposing the Roman Catholic Church, and their agenda pushing the New Age Bible versions, which ultimately led to America's (and the West's) demise since the 20th century. That's NOT "Conspirianity", it's CONSPIRACY FACT!

Yes, unfortunately, he does. And this is someone who genuinely likes David Daniels as a person.

Chick Publications' claims come primarily from testimonies and theories that can't be substantiated and have actually been proven either partially or fully untrue. Rivera, John Todd, Sister Charlotte, Hislop... the list goes on and on.

Believe me, the Roman Catholic church does NOT teach scriptural salvation. They are cursed by God because they teach a false gospel. But to say they are the origin of all evil in the world is patently false and pretty absurd, to be honest. The Romish church has only existed since about the 500s or so. Yet they are routinely given blame for atrocities and heathen cultures that predate them.

The Vatican bans Catholics from joining freemasonic lodges (which would kind of be counter-productive if they actually invented them) and were actually persecuted by the Nazis, contrary to popular belief. This is all substantiated by factual information readily available in books and online.

Here's the thing: I'm NOT an online ministry. I DON'T do "research" (which amounts to putzing around on sites and blogs that agree with you trying to make "connections") I'm NOT a pastor. I don't claim to be one. I'm just a guy on YouTube. If you want spiritual nourishment, go to a local fellowship. Take it from me, you'll be SO much better off because of it.

Believing in the resurrection of the Lord Jesus on the third day is something that must be taken by faith. Believing that the Jesuits run the world is NOT.

Here's the link to the new video by the way:
4  General Category / Catholicism / Re: Peter the Roman conspiracy on: March 06, 2017, 09:04:23 pm
Pope says carry and read bible as if it were a mobile phone

Pope Francis on Sunday called on people to carry and read the bible with as much dedication as they do their mobile phones.

Speaking to pilgrims in a rain-soaked St. Peter's Square, the 80-year-old pope asked: "What would happen if we treated the bible like we do our mobile phones?"

He continued: "If we turned around to retrieve it when we forgot it? If we carried it with us always, even a small pocket version? If we read God's messages in the bible like we read messages on the mobile phone?"

Francis called the comparison "paradoxical" and said it was meant to be a source of reflection, adding that bible reading would help people resist daily temptations.

The pope poses regularly for "selfies" with pilgrims who flock to his weekly audiences wielding smartphones, while his English- and Spanish-language Twitter handles have more than 23 million followers.

Francis last year called the internet, social media and text messages "a gift of God" if used wisely.

"It is not technology which determines whether or not communication is authentic, but rather the human heart and our capacity to use wisely the means at our disposal," he said.

But in 2015 Francis told a young girl he was embarrassed to admit that he did not know how to use computers and was an overall "disaster" with technology. He has also said smartphones should be banned from the family dinner table and children should not have computers in their rooms.

The pope spoke during his last public appearance this week. He and top members of the Roman Curia, or its central bureaucracy, will begin their annual Lenten retreat later on Sunday that will run through Friday.


I actually think it's a good message. It doesn't make Francis saved or right about everything or anything else, but I think that's a good message considering the world we live in today.
5  General Category / Member's videos / Re: Conspirianity on: March 03, 2017, 08:50:37 pm
Another video up in this series. This one I just kind of threw together. I didn't expect to make it, but it came to me after reading an article recently.

6  General Category / Member's videos / Re: Conspirianity on: February 05, 2017, 08:36:28 pm
It's been a while, but I've uploaded a new video to this playlist. I hope to upload more in the weeks and months to come.

Thank you all and God bless you!

7  General Category / Member's videos / Re: Documentary: Black Hebrew Israelites Debunked on: January 07, 2017, 12:42:38 pm
This looks really good. I'll have to watch it later. This is a doctrine that I've been feeling a pull towards debunking myself. I love how African Americans are conveniently listed as the tribe of Judah (the royal tribe). I wonder who came up with this theory? Roll Eyes
8  General Category / Member's videos / Re: Conspirianity on: November 28, 2016, 02:32:22 am
At the 1:33 mark - who is that guy in the middle? I know the guy on the left (John Todd), and the woman on the right (a former RCC nun turned charismatic Pentacostal).

I may be tipping my hand here, but the three people in that image are John Todd, Alexander Hislop and Charlotte Wells/Keckler. Next to nothing of what they claim can be substantiated by any hard evidence. And this is coming from someone who listened to Sister Charlotte's testimony verging on tears several years ago.

I'm in the same boat when it comes to dispensationalism. I reject the idea that the General Epistles are for Jews in another dispensation. They were written to the church.

As far as doctrines that are ignored by ministries today, I would generally agree with you on those. I would also add in the doctrine of grace.

Like I said earlier, I plan to make a bunch of videos in this series. I never would have thought I'd be making videos arguing against some of the things I once believed.
9  General Category / Member's videos / Conspirianity on: November 27, 2016, 10:44:23 pm
Hi everyone,

This is a new series of videos I'm releasing that I hope will be helpful. So far, two videos on the playlist are brand new, while the rest are previous videos I've made. I plan to make a bunch of new videos tackling a host of topics under this umbrella. It's something that I've felt for a little while now, but am just now vocalizing. To be truthful (and I don't mean to be cliche), I know these videos are not going to be very popular. I've felt firsthand what debunking a commonly held belief can do to someone. They lash out and it can get ugly. I expect most of the support I have to dwindle rapidly. However, as someone who believes in the Truth, Jesus Christ, I feel obligated to bring this out to His body. I sincerely hope people will take some time to consider what I say and look it up with unbiased sources.

God bless all of you,


10  General Category / Audio Section, Scott Johnson, Bryan Denlinger, others... / Re: Bible Believers Fellowship: BD on: November 20, 2016, 08:09:19 pm
Yes, ecumenical was coined right out of the Roman Catholic Church.

These 2 sources are straight from the RCC.

Don't get me wrong, I believe the Creation account is CRUCIAL to the gospel - but by and large, a lot of these Creation Science ministries are leavened very badly, some being runned by false converts. A lot of this is due to them focusing largely on Creation Science, and pretty much ignoring preaching the whole council of God.

Here's the thing though: the word ecumenical was first used in 1587, and it is derived from two Greek words that predate the RCC. It couldn't have been coined by the RCC. The Protestants actually used the word to describe a movement before the Roman Catholics did, in 1910. The first link you provided also says that.


I think what we need to realize is that people can be wrong about things. Getting saved doesn't mean you're doctrinally perfect anymore than it means you're morally perfect. I know a lot of people who baptize infants that I believe are actually born again and a lot of people who don't that I don't. Ecumenical, in it's truest definition, means "representing a number of different Christian churches". Again, creation science crosses denominational lines.
11  General Category / Audio Section, Scott Johnson, Bryan Denlinger, others... / Re: Bible Believers Fellowship: BD on: November 20, 2016, 12:00:10 pm
I'll admit, the whole thing of him being in prison, getting transferred many times, tortured, etc - but somehow he got interviews in b/w with people like Alex Jones, and other "truth" movement heretics? Seriously - the NWO prison authorities had near complete control over him, but somehow he was able to get an interview with ALEX JONES?

People in prison have visitation rights. And what evidence do we have that he was tortured at all?

Just something didn't smell right about all this - and I remember hearing a sermon from Joey Wampler last year, and he talked about how he saw an evolutionist WIN a debate against Hovind, b/c Hovind failed to explain some very important things.

Things can slip your mind. David Daniels recently misread a date from a photograph on camera.

What I find a little shocking is that Bryan and Katherine would be up in arms about him taking a vow of poverty when they claim the spiritual heritage of the Waldensians, who did the exact same thing...

And his big tie-up on the word "ecumenical" is a little confusing as well. It's the Conspirianity "buzzword culture" at work. Ecumenical simply means "representing a number of different Christian churches". Conspiracy minded Christians have taken the word and made it a buzzword for "one world religion". Creation teaching crosses denominational lines. Now Kent Hovind has his own procession of problems (he's just as conspiratorial as anyone, he unlawfully divorced his wife, Steven Anderson, etc.) but this particular accusation from Bryan is completely ridiculous.
12  General Category / Off Topic Stuff / Re: Funny 2016 Election stuff or not so funny on: November 09, 2016, 08:27:32 pm
OK, Trump was going to win anyways, but odd that Hillary "conceded" BEFORE Trump hit 270.

Now wait a minute, brother. Just yesterday everyone was saying we had all of this proof that it was being rigged for Hillary. Now all of a sudden it was rigged for Trump? Huh
13  General Category / Member's videos / Re: Advanced Revelation on: October 14, 2016, 08:56:49 pm
Nice presentation - yeah, I've heard some of these "Advanced Revelation" teachers, one of them being Doug Stauffer.

To be honest, they've also brought a lot of confusion in terms of teaching the pre-trib rapture doctrine. Don't get me wrong, it is the correct doctrine - but they will just get too cute in terms of looking all over scripture just to find anything that preaches a pre-trib rapture (ie, looking for a needle in a haystack), as if their own faith in it is pretty shaky.

Thank you Smiley

That was a problem I had, too. I went looking through the scriptures for any little thing to bolster my doctrine. It's really not how we should read the Bible.
14  General Category / Off Topic Stuff / Re: Funny 2016 Election stuff or not so funny on: October 11, 2016, 10:04:22 pm
Here's the complete quote...

Yes, it's more or less the same thing.

But Beck said his public stance against Trump did not equate to unfettered support for the Democratic presidential nominee.

Just because you don't vote Trump doesn't mean you vote for Hillary. Glenn Beck certainly doesn't like Hillary, and has said many times he won't vote for Hillary ever. To spin his disdain for Trump into support for Hillary is flat out dishonest, and CNN should be ashamed of themselves.

If I say, "Don't vote for Trump", that doesn't mean "Vote for Hillary". There are two other national candidates and a slew of regional/state candidates from which to choose. Or you can skip the top of the ballot entirely. I personally am placing my vote for Richard Duncan here in Ohio, because at least he meets my minimum threshold for being a decent candidate. I'm staunchly Never Hillary and Trump isn't conservative or even a decent human being.

Trump is a lost cause and is toxifying conservatism and is personally attempting to bring every Republican House and Senate candidate down with him. You want to see carnage in this country? Give Hillary and the leftists control of Congress on top of the presidency.
15  General Category / Off Topic Stuff / Re: Funny 2016 Election stuff or not so funny on: October 11, 2016, 11:25:41 am
Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton is a 'moral, ethical choice' for Republicans

Washington (CNN)Conservative political commentator and media personality Glenn Beck said the election of Hillary Clinton as president by refusing to support Donald Trump is "a moral, ethical choice" for Republicans.

The outspoken opponent of the GOP's presidential nominee wrote on Facebook over the weekend that every voter had to decide for themselves what constitutes "a bridge too far," after the release of footage last week in which Trump can be heard making lewd and sexually aggressive comments about women.

"It is not acceptable to ask a moral, dignified man to cast his vote to help elect an immoral man who is absent decency or dignity," Beck wrote on Facebook in reference to Trump. "If the consequence of standing against Trump and for principles is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton, so be it. At least it is a moral, ethical choice."

Beck, who founded media venture TheBlaze after rising to prominence as host of his eponymous radio and TV show, campaigned for Texas Sen. Ted Cruz during the Republican primaries, and has consistently criticized Trump throughout the primary campaign and even after Cruz endorsed him.
He joined a growing chorus of conservative leaders over the weekend who are appealing to Trump to withdraw his candidacy for president, adding that a vote for the businessman was "validating his immorality, lewdness, and depravity."

But Beck said his public stance against Trump did not equate to unfettered support for the Democratic presidential nominee.

"If she is elected, the world does not end," Beck said of Clinton. "Once elected, Hillary can be fought. Her tactics are blatant and juvenile, and battling her by means of political and procedural maneuvering or through the media, through public marches and online articles, all of that will be moral, worthy of man of principal."

He added: "Trump stepping down does not guarantee a Clinton win, but it does guarantee that the Republican party still stands for something, still allows its members to maintain (their) own self-respect and that it still has a future."

Beck's comments come as the GOP continues to grapple with Trump's latest controversy. House Speaker Paul Ryan announced Monday that he would no longer campaign for or defend his standard-bearer.

Wow... way to take that completely out of context, CNN. Read what Glenn Beck said. He didn't say "vote for Hillary, she's a moral choice." He said if opposing Trump means Hillary ends up president, so be it. At least you still have your principles. Not voting for either is the moral choice, even if Hillary ends up president. CNN totally spun that to boost Hillary. It's really dishonest.
16  General Category / Off Topic Stuff / Re: Funny 2016 Election stuff or not so funny on: October 10, 2016, 08:04:48 pm
Emails: Democrats Were TERRIFIED Trump Wouldn’t Get Nomination

Donald Trump is a dream come true for the Hillary Clinton campaign. According to documents uncovered in the latest Wikileaks dump, Clinton campaign operatives were absolutely terrified that Trump would not win the Republican presidential nomination.

17  General Category / Member's videos / Advanced Revelation on: October 09, 2016, 06:43:53 pm

In this video, we take a critical look at the doctrine of advanced revelation, as taught by Peter Ruckman.
18  General Category / Off Topic Stuff / Re: Funny 2016 Election stuff or not so funny on: September 21, 2016, 09:57:06 pm
Cruz: “If Something Happens To Hillary, I Agree To Run As A Democrat Against Trump”

Cruz: “If Something Happens To Hillary, I Agree To Run As A Democrat Against Trump”

Ted Cruz has left a meeting with Mike Pence without saying whether he will endorse or even vote for Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump.
The Texas Republican senator and onetime rival of Trump’s has refused to endorse the billionaire. Cruz met privately with Pence in Washington and attended a lunch with the Indiana governor and a number of other Republican senators.

Cruz says he had a “good and productive conversation” and a “very good meeting.” He calls Pence a “good man, a friend” and a “strong conservative.”

However, according to a source who attended the meeting, Cruz refused to endorse Trump and, instead, threw a bombshell that left most of the Republican attendees speechless: Ted Cruz plans to run against Donald Trump after all.

Truth be told, he didn’t vow to do it, he merely suggested the possibility. And according to the source, the only way that would ever be possible is if it turns out the rumors are true and Hillary Clinton is prevented form running against Trump on account of her deteriorating health.

Are you sure that isn't a satirical article? Switching parties makes very little sense (especially considering the DNC would never stand for it), and the Ted Cruz monologue sounds like someone literally wrote it.

I don't buy it, personally.
19  General Category / Member's videos / The Mandela Effect on: September 10, 2016, 08:29:50 pm

The Mandela Effect is a theory that has become wildly popular here on the internet, and even among Christians. Where does this theory come from? How plausible is it?

Just a forewarning, I kind of come off a little harsh in this one...
20  General Category / Member's videos / Science in the Bible: Leprosy on: August 07, 2016, 10:34:14 am

Leprosy was a devastating disease in the ancient world. The Israelites were given specific instructions by God in the Torah to keep this disease from spreading.

Hope you guys enjoy this one. Just a short little look into an eye-opening portion of scripture. God bless!
21  General Category / Off Topic Stuff / Re: Funny 2016 Election stuff or not so funny on: July 24, 2016, 08:34:18 pm
nope, they really tried to deny him the nomination.

Come on, man... They probably tried to when he didn't have the delegates yet, but once he reached the threshold, it was over. They couldn't do squat. All of the "their gonna deny him the nomination!" stuff post-Indiana primary was just speculation and hype. If the whole system is rigged from beginning to end and they didn't want Trump in as nominee, he wouldn't have won the delegates necessary. So either it's not rigged and the GOP got stuck with Trump, or he's the guy they wanted all along. I tend to believe the former. If anyone should be mad about being denied their party's nomination, it's crazy Bernie (because it actually happened).

22  General Category / Off Topic Stuff / Re: Funny 2016 Election stuff or not so funny on: July 22, 2016, 01:27:48 am
So all of the "they're gonna deny Trump the nomination!" stuff was just wild speculation and hype, I assume? Cheesy

Tell me you'd endorse a man who publicly insulted your wife and insinuated that your father assassinated JFK. Just saying.

You want to talk about a sore loser? Our own governor didn't even bother to make an appearance at the convention...
23  General Category / Police State/NWO / Re: BILDERBERG LEAK: SECRETIVE GROUP TO DISCUSS INTERNET ID, GLOBAL TAX on: June 09, 2016, 06:14:07 am
If they're so secretive, why do we know so much about them?
24  General Category / Member's videos / Satan The Imitator on: May 31, 2016, 08:49:38 pm

A common assertion is that the devil avoids all things that would seem to glorify God. Is that true?

It's been a little while, but I've got a new video up. Just a lot of things kind of got away from me recently. Hopefully, Lord willing, I'll be back in the word more and able to help the body of Christ in any way I can.

Thanks for your support and God bless you all.
25  General Category / Hollywood / 'Glee' Actor Mark Salling Indicted on Child P0rn Charges on: May 27, 2016, 06:26:08 pm
 "Glee" star Mark Salling was indicted by a federal grand jury Friday on child p0rnography possession charges, federal prosecutors said.

Salling, 33, was charged with receiving child p0rnography and possessing child p0rnography, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California. Salling played the role of Noah "Puck" Puckerman on the hit FOX television series "Glee."

 Salling was arrested by Los Angeles police in December, but had not been charged federally. The federal indictment alleges that Salling downloaded or possessed a still image and videos depicting young girls.

"Those who download and possess child porn0graphy create a market that causes more children to be harmed," U.S. Attorney Eileen M. Decker said in a statement. "Young victims are harmed every time an image is generated, every time it is distributed, and every time it is viewed."

The LAPD referred the matter to federal authorities after allegedly finding "thousands" of images of child p0rnography on a laptop, a hard drive and a flash drive taken from Salling's home, prosecutors said. He is free on $20,000 bail.

A request for comment from Salling's attorney, Alan Eisner, was not immediately returned.

Salling through his attorney agreed to surrender June 3 and is expected to be arraigned then, the U.S. Attorney's Office said. Each of the two charges carries up to 20 years in prison.

26  General Category / War On Family / Re: The Falling Away, sodomite version on: May 21, 2016, 07:39:07 pm
What on earth is the matter with people?

Huffington Post comes out with honestly some of the stupidest things I've ever heard, and the Lord Jesus Christ being the first "transgender man" ranks as probably the stupidest ever.
27  General Category / Audio Section, Scott Johnson, Bryan Denlinger, others... / Re: Bible Believers Fellowship: BD on: May 18, 2016, 09:14:54 pm
Someone PLEASE post a comment on or send Bryan a pm about his most recent video about James White. He's completely wrong about that evangelicalcatholic.com website that he used with the 'recommended books' page.

Here's what it says on that page: "I have included several categories: Doctrine and Official Teaching, Catholic and Christian Apologetics, Conversion Stories, Creation/Evolution, and some Protestant/Evangelical/Orthodox books that respond to Catholic teaching."

It's not an endorsement by a Catholic. He's listing the books in his personal library. Remember, he's an apologist. An apologist attempts to answer criticism and attacks against their belief.

Let's look at some other books that are on his 'recommended books' page:

-Whatever Happened to Heaven? by Dave Hunt (Harvest House, 1988)
-Global Peace and the Rise of Antichrist by Dave Hunt (Harvest House, 1990)
-The Cult Explosion by Dave Hunt (Harvest House, 1980)
-New Age Bible Versions by Gail Riplinger (1993)
-A Woman Rides the Beast: The Roman Catholic Church and the Last Days by Dave Hunt (Harvest House, 1994)
-The Two Babylons or the Papal Worship by Alexander Hislop (Loizeaux Brothers, 1959, orig 1916)

Is a Roman Catholic endorsing those books? I think you know the answer. He's a Roman Catholic apologist, he uses them to argue against the points in the book. It's a classic example of studying your enemy.

This is a case where Bryan saw what he wanted to see. He made a big deal about James White's refutation of Gail Riplinger (to "explain" why Gail's book is on the list), but there are no such explanations for Dave Hunt's multiple books and Hislop's book being on the list. And Bryan never showed that those books were on the list, either. He conveniently never showed them on screen. Again, Bryan's seeing what he wants to see. I hope he's responsive to correction from someone else.
28  General Category / Off Topic Stuff / Re: Funny 2016 Election stuff or not so funny on: May 18, 2016, 06:09:40 am
If you left personal attacks out of it and kept it on-topic, conservatives will always beat liberals in a debate about issues. Always.

Why doesn't Trump do that? Probably because he doesn't really know the issues that well and he's not a conservative. Wink
29  General Category / General News / Federal Judge Sides With House Republicans, Deals Major Blow to ObamaCare on: May 12, 2016, 05:36:01 pm

A federal judge ruled in favor of House Republicans on Thursday in a lawsuit brought against the legality of certain spending under ObamaCare.

Republicans took issue with an "unconstitutional" $175 million program that authorized payments to insurers over a decade to reduce co-payments for lower-income people.

On "The Real Story," Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the GOP's argument was that Congress never appropriated that money and even denied an Obama administration request for it, but the administration spent the money anyway.

"This is another example of President Barack Obama doing something as the executive which the Constitution says only the Congress can do: spend the people's money," Judge Napolitano said.

Asked Thursday about this legal development, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said this isn’t Republicans’ first attempt to oppose ObamaCare in the courts.

He said this this particular effort is unprecedented, however, because this lawsuit represents the first time in the nation's history that Congress has sued the executive branch over a disagreement about how to interpret a statute.

Judge Napolitano disagreed, saying Earnest is "dead wrong."

"This is not a dispute about the interpretation of a statute," Judge Napolitano explained. "This is a dispute about the interpretation of the Constitution, whether or not the president can violate the Constitution, which says only the Congress can spend the people's money."
30  General Category / Off Topic Stuff / Re: Funny 2016 Election stuff or not so funny on: May 04, 2016, 08:51:23 pm
Out Of Time And Near The Breaking Point, Ted Cruz Resorts To Personal Attacks On Trump

That's too rich... NowTheEndBegins is reporting on the last, desperate attempts by Cruz, saying he "resorted to personal attacks", but never mentioned all of the stuff that Trump has done to everyone else from the beginning: the continued "Lyin' Ted" stuff, the Zodiac Killer nonsense, the Cruz/Oswald stuff, basically saying Ted Cruz's wife is ugly, etc. (all of which would qualify as "personal attacks"); calling Ben Carson a pathological child molester, calling Carly Fiorina ugly, calling Marco Rubio "little" and "lightweight", calling Rand Paul a "spoiled brat without a properly functioning brain", etc.

But NowTheEndBegins isn't biased or anything like that...  Roll Eyes They're just like Breitbart and Drudge Report: sold out to Donald Trump.

How he's the nominee I have no idea, and why conservative sites like Breitbart and Christian sites like NowTheEndBegins support him I have no idea: he's neither conservative nor Christian. I honestly think it has a lot to do with the whole "Infowars Alex Jones" stuff.

Honest question to all of you: Now that Ted Cruz has dropped out of the race, were Utah, Colorado, or any state that Ted Cruz won still rigged? Or was that an overreaction? If they can supposedly rig entire elections, why is Trump the GOP nominee? I thought they hated him? Couldn't they have just faked the election results to hand the nomination to Jeb from the beginning? Also, why was it only rigged when Cruz won, but not when Trump won?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 12
Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
Free SMF Hosting - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy